Chuck Baldwin Praises Bollyn Book on the War On Terror
July 19, 2018
Updated with "What If Everything We’ve Been Told Is A Lie?" by Chuck Baldwin
If you don’t read any other book this year, read Christopher Bollyn’s The War On Terror. - Chuck Baldwin
Pastor Chuck Baldwin on The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East :
"I am VERY excited about a new book written by Christopher Bollyn entitled The War On Terror. I have read and reread it; and I believe this is one of the most important books written in recent memory. The book connects the dots between the 9/11 attacks and America’s perpetual “War on Terror.” This book needs to be read by every single American. If it was read and taken to heart by enough people, this book could literally change the course of history and save our republic. The full title of the book is The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East. - Chuck Baldwin, "Trump’s SCOTUS Pick: More Of The Same" 12 July 2018
What If Everything We’ve Been Told Is A Lie?
by Chuck Baldwin, 19 July 2018
What if everything we’ve been told about 9/11 is a lie? What if it wasn’t 19 Muslim terrorist hijackers that flew those planes into the Twin Towers and Pentagon? What if the Muslims had nothing whatsoever to do with the attacks on 9/11? What if everything we’ve been told about the reasons we invaded two sovereign nations (Afghanistan and Iraq) is a lie? What if the 17-year-old, never-ending “War on Terror” in the Middle East is a lie? What if our young soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines who have given their lives in America’s “War on Terror” died for a lie? What if G.W. Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump have been nothing but controlled toadies for an international global conspiracy that hatched the attacks of 9/11 as nothing more than a means to institute a perpetual “War on Terror” for purposes that have nothing to do with America’s national security? Would the American people want to know? Would the truth even matter to them?
The sad reality is that the vast majority of Americans who would read the above paragraph would totally dismiss every question I raised as being unrealistic and impossible—or even nutty. Why is that? Have they studied and researched the questions? No. Have they given any serious thought to the questions? No. They have simply swallowed the government/mainstream media version of these events hook, line and sinker.
It is totally amazing to me that the same people who say they don’t believe the mainstream media (MSM) and government (Deep State) versions of current events—which is why they voted for and love Donald Trump—have absolutely no reservations about accepting the official story that the 9/11 attacks were the work of jihadist Muslims and that America’s “War on Terror” is completely legitimate. These “always Trumpers” are dead set in their minds that America is at war with Islam; that Trump’s bombings of Syria were because President Assad is an evil, maniacal monster who gassed his own people; and that Trump’s expansion of the war in Afghanistan is totally in the interests of America’s national security.
BUT WHAT IF ALL OF IT IS A BIG, FAT LIE?
What if the Muslims had NOTHING to do with 9/11?
What if Bashar al-Assad did NOT gas his own people?
What if America’s “War on Terror” is a completely false, manufactured, made-up deception?
What if America’s military forces are mostly fighting for foreign agendas and NOT for America’s national security or even our national interests?
What if America’s war in Afghanistan is a fraud?
What if the entire “War on Terror” is a fraud?
The Trump robots have bought into America’s “War on Terror” as much as Obama’s robots and Bush’s robots did. Bush was elected twice, largely on the basis of America’s “War on Terror.” Obama campaigned against the “War on Terror” and then expanded it during his two terms in office. Trump campaigned against the “War on Terror” and then immediately expanded it beyond what Obama had done. In fact, Trump is on a pace to expand the “War on Terror” beyond the combined military aggressions of both Bush and Obama.
But who cares? Who even notices?
America is engaged in a global “War on Terror.” Just ask G.W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX News, The Washington Post, the New York Times and the vast majority of America’s pastors and preachers. They all tell us the same thing seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. Liberals scream against Trump, and conservatives scream against Maxine Waters; but both sides come together to support America’s never-ending “War on Terror.”
But what if it’s ALL a lie? What if Obama and Trump, the right and the left, the MSM and the conservative media are all reading from the same script? What if they are all (wittingly or unwittingly) in cahoots in perpetuating the biggest scam in world history? And why is almost everyone afraid to even broach the question?
Left or right, liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican, secular or Christian, no one dares to question the official story about the 9/11 attacks or the “War on Terror.” And those who do question it are themselves attacked unmercifully by the right and the left, conservatives and liberals, Christians and secularists, Sean Hannity and Chris Matthews. Why is that? Why is it that FOX News and CNN, Donald Trump and Barack Obama, Chuck Schumer and Ted Cruz equally promote the same cockamamie story about 9/11 and the “War on Terror?”
Why? Why? Why?
Tell me again how Donald Trump is so different from Barack Obama. Tell me again how Ted Cruz is so different from Chuck Schumer. They all continue to perpetuate the lies about 9/11. They all continue to escalate America’s never-ending “War on Terror.” They are all puppets of a global conspiracy to advance the agenda of war profiteers and nation builders. The left-right, conservative-liberal, Trump-Obama paradigm is one big giant SCAM. At the end of the day, the “War on Terror” goes on, bombs keep falling on people in the Middle East who had absolutely NOTHING to do with 9/11 and the money keeps flowing into the coffers of the international bankers and war merchants.
All of the above is why I am enthusiastically promoting Christopher Bollyn’s new blockbuster book The War on Terror.
Of course, Bollyn is one of the world’s foremost researchers and investigators into the attacks on 9/11. He has written extensively on the subject. But unlike most other 9/11 investigators, Bollyn continued to trace the tracks of the attacks on 9/11. And those tracks led him to discover that the 9/11 attacks were NOT “the event” but that they were merely the trigger for “the event.” “What was the event?” you ask. America’s perpetual “War on Terror.”
As a result, Mr. Bollyn published his findings that the attacks on 9/11 were NOT perpetrated by Muslim extremists but by a very elaborate and well financed international conspiracy that had been in the planning for several decades. Bollyn’s research names names, places and dates and exposes the truth behind not just 9/11 (many have done that) but behind America’s “War on Terror” that resulted from the attacks on 9/11.
IT’S TIME FOR THE TRUTH TO COME OUT!
And Christopher Bollyn’s investigative research brings out the truth like nothing I’ve read to date. His research connects the dots and destroys the myths.
Mr. Bollyn’s research is published in a book entitled: The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East. I mean it when I say that if enough people read this book, it could change the course of history and save our republic.
This is written on the book’s back cover:
The government and media have misled us about 9/11 in order to compel public opinion to support the War on Terror.
Why have we gone along with it? Do we accept endless war as normal? Are we numb to the suffering caused by our military interventions?
No. We have simply been propagandized into submission. We have been deceived into thinking that the War on Terror is a good thing, a valiant struggle against terrorists who intend to attack us as we were on 9/11.
Behind the War on Terror is a strategic plan crafted decades in advance to redraw the map of the Middle East. 9/11 was a false-flag operation blamed on Muslims in order to start the military operations for that strategic plan. Recognizing the origin of the plan is crucial to understanding the deception that has changed our world.
Folks, 9/11 was a deception. The “War on Terror” is a deception. The phony left-right paradigm is a deception. FOX News is as much a deception as CNN. The “always Trump” group is as much a deception as the “never Trump” group. America has been in the throes of a great deception since September 11, 2001. And this deception is being perpetrated by Republicans and Democrats and conservatives and liberals alike.
I do not know Christopher Bollyn. I’ve never met him. But I thank God he had the intellectual honesty and moral courage to write this book. I urge readers to get this explosive new book. If you don’t read any other book this year, read Mr. Bollyn’s investigative masterpiece The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East.
Again, I am enthusiastically recommending this book to my readers, and I make no apologies for doing so. The truth contained in this research MUST get out, and I am determined to do all I can to help make that possible.
I am confident that after you read this book, you will want to buy copies for your friends and relatives. The book is under 200 pages long and is not difficult reading. However, the facts and details Bollyn covers are profound and powerful. I have read the book three times so far and I’m not finished.
Frankly, Bollyn’s book made so many things make sense for me. His book dovetails and tracks with much of my research on other topics. Truly, his book helped me get a much fuller understanding of the “big picture.”
What if everything we’ve been told about 9/11 and the “War on Terror” is a lie?
The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East is available for a $20 donation by PayPal to email@example.com
The complete set of all three books: the two Solving 9-11 books, "The Deception that Changed the World" and "The Original Articles," and The War On Terror: The Plot To Rule The Middle East, is available for a $50 donation by PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org
Please include your mailing address and contact phone number with your payment. Thank you!
Grasping the facts of Israel's murderous attack on the USS Liberty is essential to understanding Israeli involvement in 9/11. Two-thirds of Liberty's crew were casualties from the Israeli attack on June 8, 1967. Adding insult to injury, the surviving crewmen were threatened with prosecution by Navy admiral Isaac Kidd if they were ever to reveal what happened when Israel killed their crewmates in cold blood. Both the Israeli attack on the Liberty and 9/11 will be featured subjects at the San Antonio event on September 8. Image of Israeli assault on the USS Liberty by David Dees
As part of a day-long symposium, I will give a presentation on Israeli involvement in 9-11 and the fraudulent War on Terror in San Antonio, Texas, on September 8 as part of the first "Great Topics Fest". This first Great Topics event is entitled "The Ship That Won't Sink" and will feature two speakers on the Israeli assault on the USS Liberty. Phil Tourney, a survivor of the attack, and Dave Gahary, a US naval submarine veteran, are the authors of Erasing The Liberty, and will recount the events of June 8, 1967.
The Israeli attack on the USS Liberty was a false-flag operation that was meant to sink the U.S. ship with all lives lost; the blame would have then fallen on the Egyptians. Like the Lavon Affair before it and several similar operations after, the attack on the USS Liberty is another case of Israeli treachery against the United States designed to trick us into war against Israel's enemies. The terror atrocity of September 11, 2001, is the latest and most outrageous of these false-flag attacks and was carried out to bring the U.S. into the Global War on Terror, America's longest and most expensive foreign war.
Tickets to attend the event in person are $27.59 - Maximum Seating Available: 100 Click on the link below for tickets or to buy all live-streams of this event for a single charge of $10.For tickets and event details:mixnstream.com/ship-wont-sink.html
To obtain live-stream tickets: click the link above for tickets, then go to the bottom of that page and click on any active video link in the playlist to the right of large video screen and then click on the main video screen. The Player and Playlist on the ticket page looks like this:
"The Ship that Won't Sink" Saturday, 8 September 2018 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Hotel Contessa on The Riverwalk 306 W Market St, San Antonio, Texas 78205
Get the Complete Set of Books for $50
July 11, 2018
SAVE MORE than 30% off Amazon's price!
Get Bollyn's complete work on 9-11: the Solving 9-11 set of two books and the War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East, for a donation of $50 (Canadian & European orders add $15 shipping) PayPal to: email@example.com or click on: www.bollyn.com/donate
THE ANALYSIS OF THE 9-11 CRIME AND THE CULPRITS Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World contains my analysis of the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11, identifies the chief suspects, and explains why it was carried out.
THE MOTHER LODE OF INFORMATION Solving 9-11: The Original Articles
contains my original research articles in chronological order from September 2001 thru May 2012.
THE PURPOSE OF THE CRIME The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East
explains the relationship between 9-11 and the fraudulent War on Terror - the longest and most expensive war in U.S. history.
The Zionist Myths We Live Under
July 11, 2018
Definition of myth 1 a : a usually traditional story of ostensibly historical events that serves to unfold part of the world view of a people or explain a practice, belief, or natural phenomenon Source: Merriam-Webster Dictionary www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/myth
Alfred and Monika Schaefer are siblings from a German-Canadian family who grew up in Alberta, Canada. They are both currently on trial in Munich, Germany. Monika has been jailed since January 3, 2018 - held without trial - charged with Volksverhetzung, or "incitement to hatred."
Monika supposedly committed this crime when she made a video in which she describes asking her Mother questions about what she knew and saw about alleged German atrocities during World War II. Monika's essential crime is that she challenges the holocaust myth, which makes her guilty of heresy in occupied-Germany.
Let's be clear about this, the Holocaust myth or narrative, which is taught to young students in Europe, is a very real "incitement to hatred" -- hatred for the German people. This myth, which is considered sacred and cannot be challenged, is supported by the power of the German state, which is still an occupied nation operating under the laws of the occupiers - 73 years after the war. There is still no peace treaty legally ending the war, which leaves Germany in a kind of legal limbo that keeps the occupying power in control.
Like the 9/11 myth, the Holocaust myth is the Zionist narrative that has been imposed on the world in order to gain support for the Zionist agenda. The Holocaust myth is designed to get global sympathy and support for the Zionist state of Israel. The 9/11 myth is designed to get global military support to wage war against Israel's enemies. Both have been very successful - for Israel. Israel, however, is the only one who benefits from these myths. The rest of us, burdened by these myths, pay a very high price.
How long must we be burdened under these Zionist myths? When will it end?
Philip Zelikow, the Zionist Jewish author of the 9/11 myth (i.e. 9/11 Commission Report) said this about "public myths" in contemporary political history:
This idea of “public presumption” is akin to William McNeill’s notion of “public myth” but without the negative implication sometimes invoked by the word “myth.” Such presumptions are beliefs, (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community. - Philip Zelikow, "Thinking About Political History," October 15, 1998
When Zelikow says these "public myths" are beliefs shared in common within the relevant political community, he means the controlled media and politicians who duly promote and support these myths - without question. This is exactly what we have seen with the 9/11 myth in the U.S. Congress for the past 17 years. Not a single politician has dared to challenge the obvious lies of the 9/11 myth. Not one congressman calls for an end of, or even a debate about, the utterly fraudulent War on Terror, which is now the longest foreign war in U.S. history - and the most expensive!
The "relevant political community," (i.e. the Zionist-controlled media and politicians) says nothing about the abundant evidence that proves that the official 9/11 myth is nothing but a pack of lies. You could throw one hundred solid scientific proofs showing that the 9/11 myth is false but the edifice of lies would still be standing within the media's "reality" and the halls of Congress because the power behind the myth is the power behind our government. The Zionist myths will therefore persist as long as the Zionists control these fundamental elements of our nation - the media and the government.
This means that we will be burdened under these myths, the holocaust, 9/11, the Kennedy murders and their magic bullets, etc., until the Zionist power is uprooted and removed from all positions of influence in our political systems, in Germany, the United States, and elsewhere.
The Zionist myths are essential for them to control our nations. Proving that the myths are not true is not enough. The controlled media and government are obviously completely deaf to our pleas for truth and justice, and will remain so until the Zionist power is removed.
Memo to President Trump
July 9, 2018
Robert D. Steele asked me to submit a memo to President Trump, that he would get to the president about Zionist/Israeli involvement in 9/11. The following is my memo:
To: President Donald Trump From: Christopher Bollyn, Author of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World Date: July 6, 2018 Subject: U.S. Middle East Policy
"We have spent $7 trillion – trillion with a T – $7 trillion in the Middle East. You know what we have for it? Nothing! Nothing." - President Donald Trump, April 28, 2018 Graphic: Washington Post
Dear Mr. President,
As you have said very clearly, the United States is bogged down in a costly quagmire in the Middle East, engaged in covert military operations in countries where there is no real U.S. interest. We have gained nothing from 17 years of war in which untold thousands have been killed or maimed and entire nations have been devastated. Our Middle East policy is disastrous and must be changed. If we don't change our policy we can only expect more of the same – thousands more dead, millions more refugees, trillions more wasted.
Why are Americans being sent to wars where there is no U.S. national interest? Whose interest is being served by these military interventions? The American people have been led to believe that the War on Terror is a good thing, while our military operations leave utterly destroyed cities and infrastructure in their wake. U.S. military intervention has contributed to a humanitarian crisis across the region and beyond. The wars have created millions of refugees who have become a burden to other countries. If the War on Terror is a good thing, why has it caused so much suffering and chaos?
In order to correct our policy we need to understand who got us into this mess in the first place. The 9/11 terror atrocity and War on Terror plots were both conceived by Israeli military intelligence in the 1970s under the leadership of Menachem Begin, the self-proclaimed "Father of Terrorism" and founder of the Likud party who became prime minister in 1977. The War on Terror doctrine was rolled out in a "propaganda offensive" in July 1979 at a Netanyahu Institute conference in Jerusalem. The Israeli trick was to get the U.S. military to neutralize and fragment its enemies, most notably Iraq and Syria, under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Since 1979, this devious plan has been openly promoted by Benjamin Netanyahu. 9/11 was a false-flag operation designed to kick-start the long-planned War on Terror. On 9/11, War on Terror proponent Netanyahu told the New York Times that the terror atrocity was "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations.
The Israelis have a long history of using false-flag terrorism against the United States:
·1954 July – The Lavon Affair: Israeli agents place bombs in U.S. and British libraries and institutions in Egypt in a false-flag operation meant to be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood.
·1967 June – Israeli aircraft and ships attack the defenseless USS Liberty, killing 34 and wounding 171, with the intention of sinking the ship – with no survivors – and the blame being assigned to Egypt.
·1983 October – A truck bomb kills 241 Marines in their barracks in Beirut. Former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky says Mossad knew the details of the truck, the time, and location of the bombing, but only gave a general warning to the Americans. A nebulous "Islamic Jihad" group is blamed; Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger says U.S. has no knowledge about who really did the bombing.
·1986 February – Mossad plants a radio relay device in an apartment in Tripoli, Libya, to send fake messages that appear to be coming from the Libyan government; U.S. intelligence is successfully tricked and President Reagan orders bombing of Libya based on Mossad's fake messages.
1978 – Israeli agent Arnon Milchan's first film features a Boeing 747 crashing into the PanAm building.
1979 July – Netanyahu Institute hosts conference on terrorism calling for U.S. military intervention in Middle East.
1979 – Isser Harel, founding chief of Israeli intelligence, predicts 9/11 attacks in New York City.
1982 February – Israeli Likud strategist Oded Yinon publishes plan (in Hebrew) calling for the “dissolution of Syria and Iraq" and Balkanization of all Arab states.
1983 – Israel creates foe for War on Terror: Under Ehud Barak, Israeli military intelligence (AMAN) begins arming and training Gulbuddin Hekmatyar's anti-Western Hezb-i-Islami terrorists in Pakistan, including Osama bin Laden.
1987 – Two of Isser Harel’s senior Mossad agents, Avraham Shalom Bendor and Zvi Malkin, obtain security contract for World Trade Center; Port Authority cancels contract when their criminal history is discovered.
1990 – Rejected by Port Authority due to criminal conviction in Israel, Mossad's Shalom Bendor goes to work for Jules Kroll.
1993 February – Zionists manage prosecution of WTC bombing: Israeli-American Michael Chertoff, U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, plays key role in prosecution. Zionist Judge Michael Mukasey presides over case against "Blind Sheikh." FBI informant Emad Salem is paid one million dollars for his testimony. Media leads public to believe that Muslims want to destroy the Twin Towers.
1993 – After first WTC bombing Kroll Associates gets security contract for the Port Authority and the WTC.
1994 – After losing Saudi and Pakistani support, the Israeli-trained "remainder of Hezb-i-Islami merges into al-Qaeda and the Taliban."
1998 December – Philip Zelikow’s Catastrophic Terrorism Study Group publishes report "Imagining Transforming Event" in Foreign Affairs (CFR). Co-authors Ashton Carter and John Deutch work for Global Technology Partners, an exclusive affiliate of Rothschild N.A.
2000 September – A Neo-Con group, Project for the New American Century (PNAC) suggests that "a catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor" may be necessary to facilitate "the process of transformation" they call for in U.S. military policy.
2001 – Israeli Mossad company ICTS controls security screening at U.S. airports on 9/11. Directors include Yair Shamir, son of notorious Israeli terrorist and assassination chief Yitzhak Shamir.
2001 – Israeli intelligence creates false histories for alleged hijackers. Israeli spies posing as "art students" live near hijacker patsies. Duplicate documents are used to create false histories, standard procedure for Mossad false-flag operations.
2001 – Ronald Lauder manages Gov. Pataki’s privatization scheme which includes WTC property. Lauder funds Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy at Mossad center (IDC) where Israeli Major General Daniel Rothschild heads Institute for Policy and Strategy.
2001 July 24 – Larry Silverstein gets lease for World Trade Center. Silverstein obtains lease thru fellow Zionist agent Lew Eisenberg, chairman of the Port Authority. Silverstein and Eisenberg are both members of UJA board, major Zionist fundraising organization. Since 1996, Silverstein maintains very close contact with Netanyahu; every Sunday afternoon Netanyahu calls Silverstein.
2001 September 11 – Ehud Olmert, Israel’s deputy prime minister, is on an unreported visit in New York City. Why is it kept secret? While all civilian planes are grounded, at 4:11 p.m. on 9/11 an El Al Boeing 747 takes off from JFK bound for Tel Aviv. The flight is authorized by the direct intervention of the U.S. Department of Defense.
9/11 – Alex Brown, a firm with ties to Israeli military intelligence and Yair Shamir’s company Scitex bought many of the suspicious "put" options. "Buzzy" Krongard, executive director of the CIA, headed AB until 1998. His wife works for Rothschild Asset Management.
9/11 – Israeli government receives the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to be in the area of the WTC or Pentagon on 9/11. Odigo, an Israeli messaging company, is used to send warning several hours before attacks. Four Israelis die at WTC.
9/11 – Five Israelis working for Urban Moving Systems are arrested on 9/11 after being seen photographing and celebrating the attack on the WTC. The fake moving company is later found to be a front for the Mossad. Two of the Israelis are known Mossad agents.
9/11 – Israeli military chief Ehud Barak interprets 9/11 on BBC World and Sky News networks in London, blaming Osama bin Laden and calling for U.S. to "launch an operational, concrete, war against terror." Barak is Netanyahu's commander in the Sayeret Matkal, a covert commando force of Israeli military intelligence. Other Israeli commandos (e.g. Daniel Lewin) are involved in 9/11.
9/11 – Netanyahu praises 9/11 atrocity to New York Times: “It's very good… it will generate immediate sympathy.” In 2008, he says in Israel: "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq."
9/11 – An Israeli son of the Mossad controls 9-11 investigation. Attorney General John Ashcroft puts Israeli dual-national Michael Chertoff in charge of FBI investigation. “For day-to-day decisions, Chertoff has the last word.” Destruction of crucial evidence begins immediately. FBI oversees confiscation of evidence and non-investigation.
9/11 – Two Zionist-owned junkyards manage hasty destruction of evidence. To allow larger ships bound for Asia to load at Hugo Neu the Claremont Channel has been dredged prior to 9/11. Hugo Neu creates a global trading division in 1999, headed by two veteran ferrous metal traders from Marc Rich and Glencore AG in Switzerland. Steel evidence is shipped to Asia although scrap iron price is at the lowest level in 50 years.
Post 9/11 – Zionist with conflict of interest presides over 9/11 lawsuit: Judge Alvin Hellerstein manages 9-11 tort litigation, while his son is lawyer in Israel with firm that represents ICTS, key defendant in 9/11 litigation. Hellerstein dismisses ICTS and every 9/11 case is settled out of court.
Post 9/11 – Zionists manage compensation funds: Kenneth Feinberg and Sheila Birnbaum oversee compensation settlements for 9/11 families. Not a single case goes to trial. No 9/11 discovery occurs in court.
2003 March – Zionists control 9/11 myth: Appointed director of 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow frames the agenda and decides what evidence the commission sees. A specialist in "public myths," Zelikow comes to commission with complete outline of report – before staff even begins working.
Until 2011 – Israelis construct 9/11 memorial and legacy: WTC memorial is designed by Israeli Michael Arad, son of Moshe Arad, former Israeli ambassador to the United States.
Until today – Controlled media ignores crucial 9/11 questions and evidence. Media pushes false narrative about 9/11 and the War on Terror while ignoring evidence that disproves the official myth.
Respectfully submitted by Christopher Bollyn, author of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, Solving 9-11: The Original Articles, and The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East.
False-flag Warnings in Ukraine and Syria
June 11, 2018
False-flag Warning in Ukraine
The following is a warning of a false-flag event being planned in the Ukraine conflict at the time the World Cup begins in Russia. Given the current anti-Russian attitude prevailing in the Western capitals and media this warning deserves to be posted. A leaked plan for a false-flag operation can prevent an atrocity. Here is the text from the posting from Southfront.org:
Pro-Kiev forces are preparing a false flag attack against a delegation of the EU Political and Security Committee in Eastern Ukraine, the State Security Ministry of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) said in a statement on June 11 citing obtained intelligence data.
The EU delegation is set to visit areas near the contact line between Ukrainian and DPR forces in the region of Donbass in the period from June 13 to June 15.
According to the statement, Ukrainian forces are planning to shoot down a helicopter with the delegation using an Igla man-portable infrared homing surface-to-air missile. This missile already was taken from a weapon depot of the 2nd Assault Battalion of the 95th Air Assault Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. This battalion is deployed in the settlement of Verhnetoreckoe.
Thus, the Ukrainian side is going to accuse forces of the DPR and the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR) of carrying out an attack of the helicopter with the EU delegation.
The US-backed Free Syrian Army and the US Special Operations Forces are preparing a “chemical weapons” provocation in the Syrian province of Deir Ezzor, Major General Igor Konashenkov said on June 11.
According to Konashenkov, the US-led forces are going to stage a “chemical attack” in the village of Haql al-Jafara to accuse the Syrian government of conducting it. Balloons with chlorine gas are allegedly already delivered to the area.
“According to the information confirmed through three independent channels in Syria, the command of the so-called ‘Free Syrian Army’ aided by the forces of the US special ops units are preparing a serious provocation involving chemical warfare agents in the Deir ez-Zor province,” Konashenkov said.
“After being published in western media a staged video is set to initiate a missile strike on Syria’s state facilities by the US-led coalition and justify an offensive operation by militants against Syrian governmental forces on the eastern bank of the Euphrates River,” he added.
Konashenkov added the Russian Defense Ministry warns that the use of such provocations for destabilization of the situation in Syria is unacceptable.
The Peculiar Similarities between 9-11 and the Assassination of RFK
June 5, 2018
Sen. Robert F. Kennedy at the Ambassador Hotel shortly before he was ushered into the pantry where he was shot.
The Zionist-controlled media pretends that the truth about the murder of Robert F. Kennedy is "out of our reach." Why would they maintain this absurd position?
"The truth appears to be out of our reach." - Tony Dokoupil, "Who Killed RFK?" CBS News, May 28, 2018
“In the three years since 9-11, we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.” - "The Public Knowledge of 9-11", New York Times, September 11, 2004
The murder of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy (RFK), the leading presidential candidate when he was shot in Los Angeles on June 5, 1968, profoundly changed American history. The RFK murder case, in which a Palestinian immigrant was blamed, has several similarities with the assassination of the senator's brother, President John F. Kennedy in 1963, and the terrorist attacks of 9-11 three decades later. If we examine the peculiar characteristics these crimes have in common, what will it reveal about the culprits? If we find a high degree of commonality linking these political atrocities is it possible to deduce something about the nature of the criminal network behind them? Are we dealing with different criminal networks, or one? Is it domestic or foreign?
These three crimes are similar in several ways. On the general level each crime was in effect a coup that radically changed American political history through violence. The murder of John F. Kennedy abruptly ended a progressive and popular presidency; the assassination of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy prevented JFK's reform-minded crime-fighting brother from becoming president; and the terror attacks of 9-11 ushered in a radical policy coup and a new era focused on waging the fraudulent War on Terror, an Israeli stratagem to rule the Middle East.
Another shared characteristic is that these crimes were all false-flag deceptions in which a fall guy was scapegoated to conceal a more elaborate crime. Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Bishara Sirhan, and Osama bin Laden are the "lone gunmen" blamed for the crimes in the official narratives. In spite of ample evidence clearly disproving the official stories, to this day the mainstream media promotes the false narratives.
In all three cases official investigations were set up to support the false narrative. The agencies involved in the investigations participated in the confiscation and destruction of evidence that challenged their story. Likewise, in each case the controlled media failed to conduct its own investigation and ignored irrefutable evidence that disproves the official story. The media cover-ups have gone on for decades in spite of well-documented evidence, such as the autopsy report of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy which clearly proves he was killed by a second shooter behind him. How is it that decades go by without the truth coming out in the media; without the evidence being discussed? Who has the power to exercise such control over the media?
The autopsy of Robert Kennedy clearly shows that the fatal shot was fired from directly behind the senator, while Sirhan Sirhan was several feet in front of him.
This means the false narratives are being protected to allow the secret cabal behind these crimes to avoid being exposed and prosecuted. This has been going on for more than fifty years, which means the criminal terrorist network responsible for all three atrocities remains in power and is able to carry out similar crimes whenever it wants – and it does. The cabal behind the murders of the Kennedys and 9-11 is still in power at the highest levels of our government and media. This is why it is extremely important that the criminal network responsible for these heinous crimes be identified.
"SIRHAN DID NOT KILL MY FATHER."
The fact that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has spoken out and is calling for an investigation into the assassination of his father fifty years ago is commendable. His doubts about who really murdered his father were published in a Washington Post article on May 26, entitled "Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son RFK Jr. doesn’t believe it was Sirhan Sirhan."
“There were too many bullets,” Kennedy Jr. said. “You can’t fire 13 shots out of an eight-shot gun.” Furthermore, as the article reported, "Kennedy was shot at point-blank range from behind, including a fatal shot behind his ear. But Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian immigrant, was standing in front of him. Was there a second gunman? The debate rages to this day."
It should be clear that we are not really talking about a raging debate, but rather a media and government cover-up of well-documented facts. Los Angeles Coroner Thomas Noguchi conducted the official autopsy on the body of Robert Kennedy on the morning of June 6, 1968, and found that the shot that killed RFK “had entered through the mastoid bone, an inch behind the right ear and had traveled upward to sever the branches of the superior cerebral artery.”
Noguchi wrote about the murder in a book entitled Coroner (1983), in which he said, "Until more is precisely known...the existence of a second gunman remains a possibility. Thus, I have never said that Sirhan Sirhan killed Robert Kennedy."
Paul Schrade, a member of the Kennedy entourage, has been trying since 1974 to persuade authorities to reinvestigate the case and identify the second gunman. Robert Kennedy, Jr. has joined forces with Schrade in calling for a new investigation. "The fact that Robert Kennedy Jr. would say, 'Sirhan did not kill my father,'" Schrade told the Boston Globe, "I think that's very effective."
“Yes, he did shoot me. Yes, he shot four other people and aimed at Kennedy,” Schrade said about Sirhan. “The important thing is he did not shoot Robert Kennedy. Why didn’t they go after the second gunman? They knew about him right away. They didn’t want to know who it was. They wanted a quickie.”
In a statement to the author of “Who Killed Bobby? The Unsolved Murder of Robert F. Kennedy,” before Sirhan's parole hearing in 2016, Schrade said:
The LAPD and LA DA knew two hours after the fatal shooting of Robert Kennedy that he was shot by a second gunman and they had conclusive evidence that Sirhan Bishara Sirhan could not and did not do it. The official record shows that [the prosecution at Sirhan’s trial] never had one witness – and had no physical nor ballistic evidence – to prove Sirhan shot Robert Kennedy.
Evidence locked up for 20 years shows that the LAPD destroyed physical evidence and hid ballistic evidence exonerating Sirhan, and covered up conclusive evidence that a second gunman fatally wounded Robert Kennedy.
In calling for a new investigation into the murder of his father, Robert Kennedy, Jr. is like the relatives of the 9-11 victims who want a proper forensic investigation of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The fact that none of these cases were properly investigated from the beginning is the first shared characteristic; in all three cases there was flagrant tampering and outright destruction of evidence. Who is being protected by the failure to investigate the evidence from these crimes? Who has the power to control and corrupt such investigations?
Another peculiar similarity is that the Ambassador Hotel, where RFK was killed, and the World Trade Center were both owned by Zionist Jews who had very high-level connections to the state of Israel. In both cases the ownership of the building also appears to have played a key role in the crime. In the case of World Trade Center, having control of the property allowed the terrorists to prepare the buildings for the explosive demolitions that occurred on 9-11. Larry Silverstein, former national director of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), a major funding operation for Israel, obtained control of the Twin Towers about five weeks before 9-11. For years prior to 9-11, Silverstein had regular weekly phone calls with Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the godfather of the War on Terror, which began as a result of the false-flag terror attacks. What were Netanyahu and Silverstein talking about every Sunday afternoon?
The Ambassador Hotel was owned by J. Myer Schine who was connected to the Jewish Mob and the Henry Crown family.
The Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles was owned by Junius Myer Schine, father-in-law of Lester Crown, son of Henry Crown (born Krinsky), the largest shareholder of General Dynamics, a leading defense contractor. Henry Crown was a high-level Zionist agent who sent an aircraft manufacturing plant to Israel in the early 1950s in violation of U.S. law. The factory he sent to Israel illegally became the original Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) plant. The Crown family is also connected to both Kennedy assassinations and the 9-11 cover-up. (See: "JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time")
Under Myer Schine's ownership the Ambassador Hotel hosted the gambling operations of Mickey Cohen, the West Coast lieutenant of Jewish mob boss Meyer Lansky. U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy had been involved in the prosecution of Cohen in which he was convicted for tax evasion and sent to Alcatraz in 1961. Who arranged for Kennedy to use the Ambassador Hotel?
The Ambassador Hotel had been Mickey Cohen's base of operations in the late 1940's when he became friends with the Jewish terrorist leader Menachem Begin who was hiding out in Los Angeles after a terrorist bombing in Palestine.
The Jewish gangster Mickey Cohen is not only connected to the Ambassador Hotel and the Santa Anita Racetrack, where Sirhan worked and gambled on the horses. Most notably, Cohen is also closely connected to Menachem Begin, former head of the terrorist gang, the Irgun, who was in position to take advantage of his relationship with Cohen to infiltrate his criminal network, which would include being able to set up Sirhan the Palestinian to be the Manchurian Candidate fall guy in the assassination of Bobby Kennedy. How neat.
The fact that the hotel was owned by Myer Schine, whose family was closely connected to Israeli intelligence, could explain how Sirhan, an armed stranger, was allowed to loiter in the hotel pantry for thirty minutes while Bobby Kennedy was speaking to a crowd in the adjacent room. Why would Sirhan linger in the pantry if his goal was simply to kill Kennedy? Why wouldn't he pass through the corridor and approach the candidate on the podium from behind? Why wait in the pantry when there was no plan for Kennedy to come that way? Who was choreographing the movements of Sirhan – and Kennedy?
Who was the hidden hand guiding Robert Kennedy into the pantry where Sirhan was waiting?
As the author of "I Was There When Robert F. Kennedy Died" wrote:
Later, after events began to wind down, I remembered the strange incident where Frank Mankiewicz was insistent that Bobby leave through the kitchen, rather than the ballroom. I discreetly asked others who had campaigned with him for a long time if it made any sense that Bobby would leave through the kitchen rather than through his crowd of supporters and they all said RFK preferred to walk through a crowd after a speech. Neither at the time—nor for many years afterward—did I mention the incident that I witnessed, nor did I see any published accounts anywhere explaining why Bobby went through the kitchen.
Frank Mankiewicz, who had previously served as a West Coast director for the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, worked with the Kennedy campaign. Why did Mankiewicz insist that Kennedy go through the pantry, where Sirhan was waiting with a loaded gun? What kind of hotel security would allow an armed stranger to loiter in the kitchen for a half-hour with a presidential candidate speaking in the next room?
The fact that the Ambassador Hotel and the World Trade Center were owned and controlled by individuals with high-level connections to Israel is very significant. This makes it possible to consider that Israeli agents could have taken advantage of these connections to carry out both false-flag operations. This would explain the use of an apparently mind-controlled Palestinian as the fall guy and the universal reluctance of the mainstream media to look beyond the official story. This would also explain the position of Zionist-controlled media outlets such as CBS News (controlled by Leslie Moonves, the great-nephew of David Ben Gurion, Israel's founding father) and the New York Times that we will never know what happened. They want us to think that the truth is "out of our reach" because if the truth were known it would mean the end of the Zionist project.
The new U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu
President Donald Trump with Benjamin Netanyahu
If you ask most of the governments and most of the leaders in the Middle East what is the principle barrier to peace, what is the greatest threat to security, they would say three things: Iran, Iran and Iran. - Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, May 21, 2018
We are witnessing today a new phenomenon: the capricious assertiveness of the American administration. Looking at the latest decisions of President Trump some could even think, ‘With friends like that, who needs enemies?’ - Donald Tusk, President of the European Council, May 16, 2018
One week after President Donald Trump withdrew from the multi-lateral nuclear deal with Iran, the President of the European Council Donald Tusk described the U.S. administration as "capricious".
Capricious is defined as "changing according to no discernible rules; unpredictable." However, when it comes to how the Trump administration deals with Iran there is nothing unpredictable about it. In dealing with Iran, Donald Trump is simply acting according to the well-known dictates and demands coming from Israel's right-wing leader, Benjamin Netanyahu.
THE WAR AGENDA MEMO OF 2001
Ten years ago, General Wesley Clark revealed the Zionist Neo-Con plan to "take out" Iran and six other Middle Eastern nations that was contained in a Pentagon memo that circulated at the highest level of the Defense Department shortly after 9/11: "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran," Clark said.
Now, having taken on the first six nations, it seems that Trump has decided to ignore the pleas of the Europeans and to put the screws to Iran to satisfy Netanyahu. The European Union, however, is one of Iran's largest trading partners and is unwilling to trash the nuclear deal that allows European companies to trade with the large and wealthy nation.
On May 21, Trump's new Secretary of State Mike Pompeo threatened Iran with the "strongest sanctions in history" if it did not comply with 12 demands he listed in a speech given at the Heritage Foundation, "After the Deal: The New Iran Strategy."
Pompeo said the United States would only lift its sanctions on Iran if Tehran submitted to the new demands, which seems highly unlikely given the extreme nature of the demands.
REGIME CHANGE BY FINANCIAL PRESSURE
"We will apply unprecedented financial pressure on the Iranian regime," Pompeo said.
"This sting of sanctions will be painful if the regime does not change its course from the unacceptable and unproductive path it has chosen to one that rejoins the league of nations. These will indeed end up being the strongest sanctions in history when we are complete. The regime has been fighting all over the Middle East for years. After our sanctions come in force, it will be battling to keep its economy alive. Iran will be forced to make a choice: either fight to keep its economy off life support at home or keep squandering precious wealth on fights abroad. It will not have the resources to do both," Pompeo said.
Donald Trump recently complained that the U.S. had wasted $7 trillion in 17 years of waging war in the Middle East and gotten nothing for it. Yesterday, his new Secretary of State focused his criticism on Iran for wasting its wealth. Pompeo said the U.S. will "advocate tirelessly for the Iranian people. The regime must improve how it treats its citizens. It must protect the human rights of every Iranian. It must cease wasting Iran’s wealth abroad."
On May 10, the Washington Free Beacon reported: "The Trump administration is examining a new plan to help Iranians fighting the hardline regime in Iran following America's exit from the landmark nuclear deal and re-imposition of harsh economic sanctions that could topple a regime already beset by protests and a crashing economy."
A "three-page white paper being circulated among National Security Council officials in the White House," which the Free Beacon has a copy of, "offers a strategy by which the Trump administration can actively work to assist an already aggravated Iranian public topple the hardline ruling regime through a democratization strategy that focuses on driving a deeper wedge between the Iranian people and the ruling regime."
So the "New Iran Strategy" sounds a lot like the old Syria strategy, which the U.S. has applied with disastrous results since 2012. In 2012, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote an email entitled "New Iran and Syria 2.doc":
The best way to help Israel deal with Iran's growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad… Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel's security, it would also ease Israel's understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.
During previous periods of sanctions and embargoes against Iran it was, in fact, Israelis and their agents like Marc Rich who profited by secretly trading with Iran. After the Iranian Revolution in 1979, Marc Rich bought oil from Iran despite the American embargo. Due to his special relationship with Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran became Rich's most important supplier of crude oil for more than 15 years, selling Iranian oil to Israel through a secret pipeline.
There is clearly no U.S. or European interest in waging economic war against a nation of 80 million people with a new regime of extremely oppressive sanctions. This policy is meant to foment civil strife in Iran with the intent of overthrowing the government. Trump's "New Iran Strategy" is certainly not being implemented for the benefit of the Iranian people, but solely to advance Israel's strategic plan to dominate the Middle East.
"After the Deal: A New Iran Strategy," Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, the Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC, May 21, 2018
"White House Examining Plan to Help Iranian People Oppose Regime," FreeBecon.com, Adam Kredo, May 10, 2018
"New Iran and Syria 2.doc," Hillary Clinton email, 2012
Their Nakba is Our Nakba
May 15, 2018
Nakba 1948 - Palestinian at Jaramana Refugee Camp, Damascus, Syria
Today - Palestinians at Yarmouk Refugee Camp, Damascus, Syria
The Many Faces of Zionism - Our Common Enemy
Today, May 15, is Nakba Day - Nakba being Arabic for "catastrophe" or "disaster”. On Nakba Day Palestinians commemorate their displacement, dispossession, and dispersal by armed Zionist forces in 1948.
Using massacres and terrorism, Zionist militias ethnically cleansed hundreds of Palestinian villages and towns during the war (1947-1949), which erupted after the United Nations partitioned Palestine in November 1947 giving more than half of the country to Zionist invaders from Europe. Around 80 percent of the Palestinian population, an estimated 700,000 people, were expelled from their homes on land that became Israel.
The "ethnic cleansing" and dispossession of Palestinians was carried out by Zionist forces of Russian and Polish Jews that had invaded Palestine and conquered much of the country in 1948.
Zionism is also the hidden hand driving the current devastation of Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, and Libya, among other nations -- including our own. The false-flag terrorism of 9/11 and the War on Terror are two sides of an utterly fraudulent Zionist construct designed to impoverish the United States and facilitate the conquest of the Middle East and displacement of millions of people.
More than one million of these refugees have been settled in Germany, a nation that is itself an occupied nation. More than seven decades after the war in which it was conquered by Zionist-led forces, Germany has neither a peace treaty nor a constitution while its people remain quietly burdened under draconian laws and proclamations of the occupying power.
Grasping that Zionism, a racial doctrine of Jewish supremacism, is the common factor behind much of the chaos and chronic injustice that afflicts the world today is essential to understanding and solving the most serious political problems of our time.
In a world in which Zionism is allowed to prevail we are all Palestinians.
The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East explains the real strategy behind the War on Terror - a covert Zionist plan to redraw the map of the Middle East. Available for a $20 donation via PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org or www.bollyn.com/donate/
Israel was Not Attacked - Illegal Israeli Forces on Syrian Territory were Targeted
May 10, 2018
Israel was NOT attacked; Israeli Occupation Forces on Syrian Territory were Targeted
The Missile Attack on Israeli Forces in the Golan is Completely Legal
Israeli Attacks on Syria are neither Legal nor Moral - They are Illegal Aggression against Syria
The United States considers the Golan Heights to be Syrian territory held under Israeli occupation subject to negotiation and Israeli withdrawal. The United States considers the application of Israeli law to the Golan Heights to be a violation of international law, both the Fourth Geneva Convention's prohibition on the acquisition of territory by force and United Nations Security Council Resolution 242.
With misleading headlines like this: "White House condemns Iran rocket attacks against Israel," some clarification is needed about the missiles that were reportedly fired at Israeli military targets in the Golan Heights on May 10, 2018.
Attacks against Israel? What are they talking about? The Golan Heights, with its oil and water resources, is occupied Syrian territory. It is also a very important reason why Israel wants to overthrow the government of Syria. If the Syrian government were to be overthrown, and the country divided into ethnic enclaves like Yugoslavia, there would be no legal challenge to Israel's occupation and annexation of the Golan Heights. This is the essence of Israel's plan (Yinon Plan of 1982) - to break up Syria and get away with their illegal land-grab.
Israel was certainly NOT attacked last night! The missiles allegedly fired from Syria targeted and/or landed on Israeli military targets in the occupied Golan Heights, where Israel is an illegal occupying power - on Syrian territory. The alleged missiles never even left Syrian territory, except for one that apparently landed in Lebanon. Armed resistance to Israel's occupation of the Golan Heights is both legal and moral.
As Dr. Martin Cohen wrote in the Guardian in 2002: "There is no right of self-defence for an occupying force. Clearly, actions taken by the Palestinian [or Syrian] people, in land internationally recognised as illegally occupied by Israel, are legitimate acts of resistance, subject only to the rules of war."
The White House has condemned Iran's "provocative rocket attacks from Syria against Israeli citizens" and expressed strong support for "Israel's right to act in self-defense."
But Israel has no "right" to be occupying the Golan Heights. The Syrian government, on the other hand, and forces allied with it, have both the legal and moral right to attack Israeli forces on occupied Syrian territory.
Israel took the Golan Heights from Syria in 1967 and annexed the occupied territory in 1981. The United States and the international community, however, have never recognized Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights. The United States considers the Golan Heights to be Syrian territory held under Israeli occupation subject to negotiation and Israeli withdrawal. The United States considers the application of Israeli law to the Golan Heights to be a violation of international law, both the Fourth Geneva Convention's prohibition on the acquisition of territory by force and United Nations Security Council Resolution 242.
Support Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time. Donate by PayPal to: email@example.com or by clicking here: www.bollyn.com/donate
My Only Question about the 9/11 Narrative: Is it True – or False?
May 3, 2018
False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil. - Socrates
A detainee in Guantanamo Bay called Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), who is supposedly "the mastermind" of the terror attacks of 9/11, is now after many years back in the news. There have been recent reports that he may have suffered brain damage during interrogation sessions at a CIA black-site in Poland, where the detainee was held after being arrested in Pakistan in March 2003. So, fifteen years after he was abused during interrogation, the military is only now trying to determine if his brain has been damaged?
The detainee said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11
In an April 30, 2018, article entitled "Lawyers: Scan suggests alleged 9/11 plotter suffered head injury in CIA custody," Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald (McClatchy) writes from Guantanamo, Cuba, that brain scans conducted on the man said to be Khalid Sheik Mohammed, accused of orchestrating the 9/11 attacks, show damage consistent with abuse he might have suffered in CIA custody.
"You've heard endlessly about waterboarding," former Vice President Dick Cheney said at a speech in 2009 at the American Enterprise Institute. "It happened to three terrorists. One of them was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11, who has also boasted about his beheading of Daniel Pearl."
"I WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE 9/11 OPERATION, FROM A to Z."
In 2007, the detainee said to be KSM supposedly confessed to being the mastermind of 9/11:
I was the Operational Director for Sheikh Usama Bin Laden for the organizing, planning, follow-up, and execution of the 9/11 Operation… I was the Military Operational Commander for all foreign operations around the world…
I was Emir (i.e., commander) of Beit Al Shuhada (i.e., the Martyrs' House) in the state of Kandahar, Afghanistan, which housed the 9/11 hijackers. There I was responsible for their training and readiness for the execution of the 9/11 Operation. Also, I hereby admit and affirm without duress that I was a responsible participant, principal planner, trainer, financier (via the Military Council Treasury), executor, and/or a personal participant in the following;
I was responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center Operation.
This is supposedly a confession read by a third person on behalf of a detainee who obviously does not speak English very well and who does not even identify himself in the process. He is simply called Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, although he is neither identified nor sworn in during the hearing. A further contradiction is that KSM was reported to have been killed in Pakistan in September 2002. The real KSM also graduated from college in North Carolina with an engineering degree, which suggests that he would have better English skills than the unidentified detainee said to be "the mastermind" of 9/11.
Photographs of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
"I NEVER SAW THAT FACE BEFORE."
The evidence suggests that the person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is actually someone else, perhaps an Ahmed Qudus (also Qadus) who was arrested in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, in March 2003. Faced with so many contradictions in the reports about KSM, in March 2007 I called the engineering faculty of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University where KSM earned his degree in mechanical engineering in the 1980s.
The detainee called KSM (left) and Ahmed Qadus (right) both in March 2003 when KSM was reported to have been arrested at the Qadus home in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The Qadus family told the Guardian that only Ahmed was arrested and taken away from their home. Is the detainee called KSM really Qadus?
David E. Klett, a retired professor of thermodynamics, had the real KSM in several of his classes. Asked about the photos of the person said to be the terror mastermind KSM, Klett said, "I did not recognize that person. I never saw that face before."
There are many questions about this detainee called Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and how he has been handled. Is he really KSM? Is he really the mastermind of 9/11? If so, why has he not been put on trial after 15 years in U.S. custody? Why is he kept incommunicado in Cuba?
IS IT TRUE OR FALSE?
Above and beyond these questions, however, is one we need to ask about this detainee and his supposed role in 9/11: Is it true, or is it false? Either the detainee said to be KSM is in fact the mastermind of 9/11, or he is not. This needs to be determined and proven.
If it is true, why has he not been put on trial after 15 years? If he is indeed the mastermind of 9/11, why has he not been properly interrogated to find out how the terror attacks were planned and carried out? Why is he being held in a kind of legal limbo at a military base in Cuba? Don't we deserve to know more about the person who is supposedly behind the crimes of 9/11?
The person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11, is like a linchpin in the whole sordid saga of 9/11. Either he is who they say he is, or he is not. Likewise, by extension, either the official 9/11 saga is true – or it is false.
This is much more than an academic exercise. This is nothing less than the most important historical and political question of our time. If the official narrative about 9/11 is true, why has the government failed to prove or prosecute their case after more than 16 years? Why has there been no criminal investigation? Why was crucial evidence from the World Trade Center destroyed starting on the first day?
If, on the other hand, the official story is false, it means we have been deceived from the very beginning and have been tricked into fighting numerous wars across the Middle East under the pretext of waging the Global War on Terror. According to President Trump, these wars have cost the U.S. some $7 trillion in 17 years.
THE ROLE OF AL QAEDA
Someone at the FBI, or elsewhere in government, needed to make sure that al Qaeda members were left in place – either to perpetrate the attacks or to take the blame for them afterwards. - Michael Ruppert, Crossing the Rubicon, 2004
Rather than getting a blue-ribbon investigation of 9/11, we were given a prepared narrative blaming a nebulous group called al Qaeda, supposedly headed by a wealthy Saudi named Osama bin Laden. Before the dust had even settled in New York City the blame was being assigned to bin Laden on BBC World and Sky television by Ehud Barak, the former prime minister of Israel. Barak, conveniently in London, blamed bin Laden and said it was time for the U.S. to begin an "operational war against terrorism." While the al Qaeda connection to 9/11 has never been proven, it has been the focus of the official narrative from the beginning.
How was this done? Over a period of years prior to 9/11 a whole host of terrorist bombings were blamed on al Qaeda. The detainee called KSM supposedly confessed to 29 of them, going back to the first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. The 19 alleged hijackers were like actors on a stage, positioned and prepared to take the blame for the 9/11 crimes. If you are willing to accept that Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda carried out 9/11, without seeing any evidence to prove the allegations, you can probably be misled with more unproven details connecting this suspect with this person or event. It then becomes a matter of missing the forest for the trees. This is the purpose of all the noise, discussion, and leaks about who knew what when about the 19 hijackers and their plot.
The alleged Arab hijackers were monitored by cells of Israeli "art student" spies.
If, however, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is not the real mastermind of 9/11 the question remains: who is behind the positioning and preparation of the narrative about the 19 alleged hijackers? Who was the hidden hand preparing the Arabs to take the blame for the crime? Was this the real reason the Israeli "art students" lived near the alleged hijackers?
Putting the blame on the targeted foe is the whole purpose of false-flag terrorism, but the deception only succeeds with an audience who is willing to accept an unproven allegation as true. The false narrative fails as soon as one looks for proof and finds there is none. This is exactly what we find with the official narrative of 9/11: volumes of allegations, but no solid evidence.
So, we must ask: Is it true, or is it false?
Support Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time. Donate by PayPal to: firstname.lastname@example.org or by clicking here: www.bollyn.com/donate
The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East helps the reader make sense of the War on Terror by explaining the covert strategy that is being implemented under the pretext of fighting terrorism. This most essential book is available for a $20 donation by PayPal to email@example.com or by clicking on bollyn.com/donate/
The war in Syria is in the spotlight once again after yet another alleged chemical gas attack. The 7-year-old war seems to be at a turning point with President Trump saying on one hand that he wants to get U.S. troops out of the country "very soon" while threatening that a "big price" will be paid by the government of Syria, which stands accused of having used chemical weapons in Douma, a suburb of Damascus, during the night of April 7-8.
The Israeli government is pushing hard for the U.S. to attack the government of Syria and reportedly fired missiles at a Syrian airbase near Homs overnight.
Although there are hundreds of articles about the latest chemical atrocity and what Trump will or won't do as a response, there is no discussion in the media about why U.S. forces are involved in Syria in the first place. What is the U.S. strategy behind our military engagement in Syria? Why is this not discussed in the media?
The reason why U.S. strategy in Syria is not talked about is because the American people are not supposed to know what we are doing in Syria - or why. If the strategy were legal and justified it would be discussed, but it is neither legal nor just so it is not. We are simply told that we are fighting ISIS in Syria, which is supposedly authorized by the War on Terror authorization (AUMF, Sept. 14, 2001). But if we are really just fighting the ISIS terrorist group, why have we not joined forces with the government of Syria and the Russians to fight ISIS and been done with it a long time ago?
Now that ISIS is defeated, why are we still in Syria and threatening to wage war against the Assad government, which was elected in 2014? Why are we occupying the eastern third of Syria? Why do we have a base in Syria on the Jordanian border? None of this is legal or justifiable under international law, so why are we doing it?
None of this makes any sense unless we grasp that the real reason U.S. forces are in Syria is to support the Israeli strategy (i.e. Yinon Plan, 1982) to destroy the Syrian military and break the country into ethnic enclaves as was done to Yugoslavia in the 1990s and has been done to Iraq since 2003.
In the Western media the conflict is made ridiculously simple: we are told that Russia and Syria are bad actors, and because they are bad they do bad things. Therefore we are asked to believe without evidence that they are behind all the suffering and atrocities we hear about in Syria.
But Syria is fighting a war to defend the nation from gangs of foreign-funded and trained terrorists. Russia has been asked by the government of Syria to help in this effort to defend the nation in accordance with international law. Why are they portrayed as bad actors if they are fighting the good fight to defend Syria?
The U.S. on the other hand is working with those foreign-funded and trained terrorists to illegally overthrow the government of Syria and break the nation into pieces. There is nothing good about that. Why are we doing it?
It's very simple: As Secretary of State Clinton wrote in an email in 2012: The best way to "help Israel" is to use force to overthrow the Assad government in Damascus. President Obama authorized $1 billion per year to the CIA to assist in the effort to overthrow the Assad government in order to "help Israel."
So, we are really waging war in Syria and taking the world to the brink of war with Russia in order to help Israel? How utterly reckless can a nation be?
Making sense of the fraudulent War on Terror is the subject of my latest book, The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East. It is a small and easily-read book that explains how we have been tricked into the War on Terror, which was launched in the aftermath of 9-11 and has become America's longest and most expensive war. Under the pretext of fighting terrorism we are waging illegal wars to advance an Israeli agenda to dominate the Middle East.
To obtain a copy of The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East, send $20 by PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org or by clicking on bollyn.com/donate/
Emmanuel Macron: The Rothschild Agent Who Convinced Trump to Stay in Syria
April 16, 2018
Baron David de Rothschild with his employee, Emmanuel Macron and his wife. Macron only appeared on the French political scene last year and suddenly became president of France in a race against Marine LePen. Baron David de Rothschild is also the chairman of the Governing Board of the World Jewish Congress.
Emmanuel Macron, the highly-paid Rothschild investment banker who became president of France less than a year ago, told French media on Sunday that "we convinced" President Donald Trump to stay in Syria.
Who is "we"?
Given the fact that Macron is a highly-paid Rothschild agent who became president of France, the question needs to be asked: Who is "we"?
"Ten days ago, President Trump was saying the United States of America had a duty to disengage from Syria… I assure you, we have convinced him that it is necessary to stay for the long term," Macron said in a televised interview.
This admission by Macron indicates to me that the Rothschilds are the hidden hand behind the whole media drama about the alleged nerve gas attacks in Salisbury and Syria. This would explain the way the media has been in lock step with the anti-Russian and anti-Syrian narratives, neither of which are supported with any evidence.
Rothschild partners on the Golan Heights oil project include Dick Cheney and Rupert Murdoch, the Rothschild-funded owner of News Corp. The Rothschilds invest in media in order to control public opinion. The recent Salisbury-Syria nerve gas drama is a perfect example of how their media investment works for them.
Why would the Rothschilds be involved in such dastardly intrigue? Firstly, because they are the leading Zionist family in Britain and France and the Zionist war effort in Syria is in desperate need of their help since the Syrian army is winning the war. Secondly, because they are invested in the oil fields on the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, which legally belong to Syria. If Syria becomes fragmented as per the Israeli plan to dominate the region (i.e. Yinon Plan, 1982) there will be no legal challenger to Israel's annexation of the Golan Heights.
British prime minister Theresa May views the Balfour Declaration with the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu and Jacob Rothschild at his house. The Balfour Declaration, which is the birth certificate for the Zionist state, was actually a letter written to Lord Rothschild in 1917. The letter stated Britain's support for a Zionist state in Palestine, which was in effect one party (UK) giving to a second party (Rothschild Zionists) the land of a third party (i.e. Palestine, Palestinians).
Why would France, or America for that matter, want to wage war illegally against the government of Syria in the first place? Macron's frank admission suggests that we are not really talking about French national interests at all -- but about the interests of the Zionist international, which is headed by the Rothschilds.
The Rothschilds own the mainstream media outlets that promote the false pro-war narrative against Syria. They also happen to own the oil of the occupied Golan Heights.
Sky News Censors Discussion of Douma Gas Attack
April 13, 2018
This is a one-minute video about television censorship of the Douma story. It is blocked on Facebook, as are all Southfront postings.
March 30, 2018 - Hundreds of Palestinian protesters were shot by Israeli snipers who were sent to Gaza with orders to use live fire.
Eighteen of those shot were killed in what was a planned "bloodbath".
The Israeli military under Benjamin Netanyahu planned and prepared for a "Land Day" massacre of Palestinians on March 30, which was also Good Friday. It needs to be understood that the Israeli massacre of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip was intentional.
The clearest evidence that the massacre was intentional is the murder of the Palestinian farmer Omar Wahid Samur in the early morning on Friday, several hours before the protests began. Omar was murdered by a tank shell while he was picking parsley in the pre-dawn hours in a field one kilometer from the border.
As reported by CBS News on Friday:
"The Palestinian killed Friday was identified as 27-year-old Amr Samour. The Palestinian Health Ministry said he was struck by an Israeli tank shell in the southeastern corner of Gaza.
Yasser Samour, a relative and fellow farmer, said Amr Samour was harvesting parsley before dawn, in hopes of selling it fresh in the market later in the day.
"I was working on the next field," Samour said. "We heard shelling landing on the field where Amr works. We ran there and found him hit directly with a shell. We were more than a kilometer (.6 miles) away from the border."
Omar Wahid Samur kisses his father on his wedding day...
and being grieved over in the morgue on Land Day 2018.
Omar Wahid Samur was murdered by the Israeli military to provoke Palestinian fury. There is no other possible explanation.
Israel had positioned more than 100 snipers to fire on the protesters from the sand berms they have raised near the border fence. These snipers fired on the protesters with live ammunition, killing 18 and wounding more than 700.
Two days before the massacre, Newsweek.com posted a brief article warning that Israel's deployment of snipers "could cause a bloodbath in Gaza."
Human rights advocates have expressed concern that the upcoming rallies could devolve into a bloodbath. “It looks like the Israeli army is preparing a massive firing squad to unleash on Palestinian civilian protesters and have been given orders to use live fire,” Yousef Munayyer, executive director of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, a Washington, D.C.-based coalitionof organizations that oppose Israel's policies toward Palestinians, told Newsweek.
Source: "Trump's Jerusalem Embassy Could Cause a Bloodbath in Gaza as Israeli Military Deploys Sharpshooters," Newsweek.com, March 28, 2018
The Israeli Foreign Ministry said the protest was a "deliberate attempt to provoke a confrontation with Israel" and that "responsibility for any clashes lies solely with Hamas and other participating Palestinian organisations".
The fact that Gazans live in a complete state of siege, imposed by the Israeli army, and that the Israeli army killed Omar Wahid Samur (and others) hours before the protests began, exposes the lie of the Israeli government.
Although the Zionist-controlled U.S. government will seek to block it, there must be an independent and unbiased investigation of this massacre.
HOLLYWOOD, March 4 - Demonstrating for 9/11 truth at the Oscars, the biggest annual media event in the City of Deception.
Speaking with a Japanese film crew.
The simple sign message I carried outside the Oscars. Photos by Mike Chickey
From Hollywood, I went on to San Diego where Adam Green made several excellent videos, like the one-hour interview seen below.
Adam Green interviews me about the dual deception of 9/11 and the War on Terror. Where are we now, 16 years later, and what do we need to do to end the national nightmare that 9/11 has imposed on us? URL Link - www.youtube.com/watch
Adam Green's previous interview with me has been seen by nearly 350,000 viewers, making it my most popular video interview. URL Link - www.youtube.com/watch
Support Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time. Donate by PayPal to: email@example.com or by clicking here: www.bollyn.com/donate
Hacking U.S. Energy Grid: Is Israel setting Russia up?
March 16, 2018
Are we being deceived about the Russian threat?
Is Israeli Military Intelligence setting Russia up?
Why I have been expecting false-flag hacking for the past decade.
Amit Yoran is an Israeli hacker who made a business out of hacking public utilities like Burlington Electric. Before 9/11, he served as a Network Security Manager at the Department of Defense and [was] responsible for maintaining operations of the Pentagon's network. Dr. Yoran also served as an officer in the United States Air Force [as the Director of Vulnerability Programs for Dept. of Defense's Computer Emergency Response Team]. He designed security architecture for the Pentagon and Office of the Secretary of Defense networks' backbones.
The largest unit in the Israeli army is Unit 8200, which specializes in hacking.
The badge of Unit 8200.
The title of an article in the New York Times caught my attention:
"Cyberattacks Put Russian Fingers on the Switch at Power Plants, U.S. Says."
The article begins: "The Trump administration accused Russia on Thursday of engineering a series of cyber-attacks that targeted American and European nuclear power plants and water and electric systems, and could have sabotaged or shut power plants off at will. United States officials and private security firms saw the attacks as a signal by Moscow that it could disrupt the West’s critical facilities in the event of a conflict."
I see these accusations as more baseless allegations from the anti-Russia campaign that is being waged daily by our controlled media and government. This is a very dangerous and reckless propaganda campaign that needs to be understood for what it is.
There is, for example, no solid evidence to support any of the accusations that the Russian government is behind this hacking. This is most likely a false-flag hacking operation by another party that is trying to frame the Russian government.
This seems to be the most likely explanation given the flurry of anti-Russian allegations swirling about London and Washington.
Who is the most likely suspect behind the hacking and allegations of Russian hacking of U.S. energy and utility networks? Unit 8200 of the Israeli military would have to be at the top of the list of suspects behind any false-flag hacking operation. Unit 8200 is the largest unit of the Israeli army and its specialty is hacking into computer networks.
Israelis like Amit Yoran have made a career out of hacking into energy and utility networks, as I explained in Chapter VII of Solving 9/11, "The Architecture of Terror." The following extracts explain who Amit Yoran is and how his company Riptech hacked into energy company networks around the world.
WHO IS AMIT YORAN?
Business Week says the following about "Dr. Yoran":
Dr. [Amit] Yoran is a Co-Founder of Guardium, Inc. and also served as the Chief Executive Officer and President. He was the President and Chief Executive Officer at Riptech Inc., which Dr. Yoran co-founded in 1998.
He was appointed by George W. Bush as the administration's Cyber Chief, responsible for coordinating the nation's activities in cyber security. Prior to this, Dr. Yoran served as a Vice President for worldwide-managed security services at Symantec Corp. and was primarily responsible for managing security infrastructure in 40 countries.
Before working in the private sector, he served as a Network Security Manager at the Department of Defense and [was] responsible for maintaining operations of the Pentagon's network. Dr. Yoran also served as an officer in the United States Air Force [as the Director of Vulnerability Programs for Dept. of Defense's Computer Emergency Response Team]. He designed security architecture for the Pentagon and Office of the Secretary of Defense networks' backbones.
AMIT YORAN'S "ETHICAL HACKERS"
"Mr. [Amit] Yoran is chief executive of Riptech, a U.S. company that employs 'ethical hackers' to test vulnerability of networks, including those of utility companies," the Irish Times reported on October 5, 2001. "He [Yoran] says his teams have had success in disrupting utilities' power networks, in Europe particularly," according to the article, which was aptly titled, "Welcome to the Art of Electronic Warfare." The Yorans' company hacked into the computer networks of dozens of energy companies, the Los Angeles Times reported on August 20, 2001:
Riptech Inc., a security company in Alexandria, Va., has tested security for dozens of energy-industry clients. In every case, the firm penetrated Internet-connected corporate networks and often hopped from those networks into supposedly sealed grid-control systems, according to Riptech's president, Amit Yoran…
Riptech "was founded by Elad and Amit Yoran, two Israeli West Point graduates who claim years of security experience, and Tim Belcher, a Desert Storm veteran who serves as the company's chief technology officer," the Washington Times reported on December 11, 2000. "Amit Yoran reportedly helped design the Pentagon's computer security architecture," the Times reported.
Riptech was funded by companies associated with Israeli military intelligence through Amit's brother Elad.
I will give a presentation on "Making Sense of 9/11 and the War on Terror" at the Face of Truth conference in Orlando on Saturday, March 3. My lecture is scheduled to begin at 4 p.m. The focus of my presentation will be on the need to grow the 9/11 truth movement. We need to be able to convince our fellow citizens to embrace 9/11 truth with simple and irrefutable facts about 9/11 and the War on Terror.
Was Israel Involved in Weapons Smuggling on M/S Estonia?
Was Israel Involved in Weapons Smuggling on M/S Estonia?
Unknown Middle Eastern Nation behind Smuggling of Advanced Russian Weaponry on Passenger Ferry
by Christopher Bollyn 11 February 2005
The evidence indicates that the passenger ferry M/S Estonia had been used to smuggle people, drugs, and high-tech weaponry from the former Soviet arsenal.
One thousand civilians are estimated to have died when the ferry named Estonia sank in the early hours of September 28, 1994. These people were apparently used as human shields in a high-level smuggling operation that went wrong.
Shocking new revelations indicate that clandestine shipments of Russian weapons technology, transported on a civilian passenger ferry under Sweden's watchful eye, were actually destined for an unknown nation in the Middle East.
Since the car and passenger ferry Estonia sank on September 28, 1994, there have been persistent rumors that a Middle Eastern nation was somehow involved in the catastrophe. A recent revelation from a Swedish customs chief that an earlier shipment of contraband military technology carried on Estonia had been secretly flown to an unknown destination in the Middle East - via Egypt - suggests that there is substance to these allegations.
There have been persistent rumors of Israeli involvement. A former East German intelligence agent, who claims to have worked with Mossad, told the author in 2000 that Israel had been involved in the Estonia catastrophe, but did not provide details.
The odd presence of two young men, Hicham Ben Hamou, 29, and Mohamed Ben Tounsi, 21, listed as Moroccans on the passenger list raises some questions. While these two men are listed among the 852 who perished in the disaster, their names are not included on the list of victims whose families received compensation from the insurance company.
Why did no Moroccan relatives of Ben Hamou and Ben Tounsi come forward to claim compensation? One explanation might be that these men were not Moroccans at all, but agents of an intelligence service, and there are no legitimate Moroccan relatives to make a claim.
On November 30, 2004, a program on Swedish state-supported television (SVT 1) reported that there had been a secret arrangement between Owe Wiktorin, Sweden's highest military commander at the time, and Ulf Larsson, then general director of customs, to clear specific shipments of military technology from Estonia, without inspection, on arrival in Stockholm.
The program, based on the confession of Lennart Henriksson, former chief of customs for Stockholm's harbor, reported that at least two previous shipments of Soviet weapons technology had been transported on the passenger ferry on September 14 and 20, 1994.
This covert weapons smuggling agreement was authorized at the highest level of the Swedish government, according to Henriksson. This was confirmed in an official investigation of the arrangement conducted by a specially appointed judge, Johan Hirschfeldt. Hirschfeldt's report, released January 21, stated that this arrangement was known at the highest levels of Sweden's government and defense department.
The secret transport of Soviet weapons and technology on Estonia, however, turned the civilian passenger ferry, with its passengers, into a military target. This must have crossed the minds of the Swedish authorities involved in the smuggling scheme.
The prime minister of Sweden at the time was Carl Bildt, from the conservative party, although his term ended two days after the catastrophe. Immediately after the sinking, Bildt promised the Swedish nation that the wreck would be salvaged and the victims' bodies recovered. His broken promises and documented involvement in an illegal weapons smuggling operation notwithstanding, Bildt went on to become a darling of the internationalist elite, adopted by the U.S.-based RAND Corp. and made a special envoy of the U.N. in the Balkans, where he began serving in 1995.
While the wreck lies in international waters, Sweden has actively prevented an independent investigation into what caused the disaster. The Swedish state has passed an extraterritorial law to prevent its citizens from diving to the wreck.
Sven Anér, veteran Swedish journalist and author, has provided AFP with information about the Middle Eastern connection with the weapons smuggling on Estonia. This material was censored from the SVT 1 exposé and has not been reported in the mainstream press.
Anér, born in 1921, worked with the daily Dagens Nyheter from 1948-62, including two years as Moscow correspondent, and with Swedish Radio-TV from 1963-71.
Lars Borgnäs, who produced the SVT 1 program, censored the most important information, Anér said. This was the fact that the secret military cargo on September 20 was not for the Swedish military but was en route via Egypt to an unknown destination. This raises the obvious question: Why would Sweden enable, facilitate, and cover-up another nation's crime?
Borgnäs told Anér he had omitted mentioning that the cargo was destined for a third country, via Egypt, out of "consideration for the parties involved."
Ingrid Sandqvist, customs chief at Arlanda confirmed to Anér that she had received orders to clear the cargo for forwarding via Egypt, although she did not "recall" having inspected it. Furthermore, Sandqvist said she did not know the origin of the cargo. Anér said he has the impression that Sandqvist had not been allowed to check the cargo, something she is supposed to do.
Lars Göran Farm, then marine engineer with Nordström and Thulin, Swedish co-owners of Estonia, confirmed to Anér that the ship owner had ordered a special escort from Vägverket, the Swedish highway authority, for a sensitive cargo on September 28, 1994. The Vägverket personnel, ready to escort the cargo from the harbor to Arlanda airport, left the harbor empty-handed after learning that Estonia had sunk.
The information that the previous shipment of military technology had been forwarded to a third country via Egypt suggests that the contraband cargo was not destined for the United States, Anér said. Given the circumstances, the custom chief's report suggests that its final destination may have been Israel.
Israel and the U.S. have worked together on numerous military projects, such as the Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL), a high-energy laser weapon system designed to shoot down missiles. The THEL was developed by a team of U.S. and Israeli contractors working with TRW, later acquired by Northrop Grumman, for the U.S. Space & Missile Defense Command and the Israeli military.
Daniel Saul Goldin, NASA Administrator from 1992-2001, had been general manager of the TRW Space and Technology Group in Redondo Beach, Calif. prior to coming to NASA. Goldin bragged about how he cut key personnel at NASA and ordered the hiring of sub-contractors, especially "women-owned" and "minority-owned" firms.
This policy, however, resulted in breaches in security and massive information loss through foreign sub-contractors working at NASA. The massive thieving by Chinese sub-contractors of sensitive NASA information, recently reported by the computer programmer Clint Curtis to a congressional panel, is the direct result of Goldin's hiring policy.
Much of the research science that goes into the development of laser weapons like THEL is conducted at Russian research institutes in Moscow and Nizhny Novgorod.
Israel has extensive, although not always friendly, relations with Russia. This is due to the fact that the Zionist state was founded primarily by immigrants from Russia and the former republics of the Soviet Union. A large influx of immigrants from the Soviet Union in the 1980s and 90s brought many well-educated scientists from Russian research centers to Israel.
Israel has close ties with former republics, such as Estonia. Shortly after regaining its independence in 1991, the tiny Baltic republic made a very odd purchase of used artillery pieces from Israel - for $50 million. Because many of the weapons didn't even function, the government of Estonia later sued to recover some of the money.
As reported in my article in the August 5, 2002 issue of American Free Press, divers hired by the Swedish government to survey the sunken vessel spent hours searching cabins on Deck 6 of Estonia for a black attaché case carried by a Russian weapons dealer named Aleksandr Voronin.
The divers worked for Rockwater, a subsidiary of Brown & Root Energy Services (BRES). Each diver had signed a lifetime agreement obliging them to remain silent about what they did on the wreck some 200 feet below the surface. BRES is a subsidiary of Halliburton.
Estonia researcher Jutta Rabe told AFP that Rockwater was not the lowest bidder, but got the job from Johan Franson, head of the Swedish Maritime Administration. "Secrecy," Rabe said, "was of paramount importance."
AFP has copies of the diving logs, which show that the sought-after attaché case was finally found in Cabin 6230, the cabin usually reserved for VIP guests or the relief captain, who was also on board.
Upon finding the case on Dec. 4, 1994, the diver asks his supervisor J. Barwick, "It says Aleksandr Voronin. Is this what we're looking for?"
Voronin is an Ashkenazic Jewish surname coming from the village of Voronino in the Bobruysk area of Byelorussia, according to A Dictionary of Jewish Surnames from the Russian Empire by Alexander Beider. The root "voron" means crow or raven.
Aleksandr, a member of the Voronin "business dynasty" from Kohtla-Järve on the Estonia-Russia border, owned a company in Tallinn called "Kosmos Association" while his relative, Valeri, had a branch company in Moscow which did business with the Kurchatov Institute, Russia's famous space technology and nuclear research center. Both Voronin companies were established to sell specimens of Russia's modern space and weapons technology.
Aleksandr Voronin was traveling on Estonia with Vassili, his 15-year-old son, and his father-in-law, Vassili Kruchkov. After being rescued, they told the press they were on a business trip to Denmark. Asked why they had not taken a plane, Aleksandr said he was worried that "high winds" could have delayed the plane.
When Aleksandr's wife, Larissa, heard about the sinking, she lit 33 Jewish ceremonial candles she had bought in Jerusalem on a trip to Israel. "I knew that these should only be lit in a dire or special occasion and that you should only burn them a little each time," she said. "I burned them to the end."
Fortunately, the three members of the Voronin family survived the sinking, but Aleksandr is said to have died of a heart attack at age 45, in 2002, two weeks after SüddeutscheZeitung, a leading German newspaper, published details of his weapons and space technology business in connection to the Estonia catastrophe.
Rabe points to a group of Russian nationalists from the former Soviet intelligence agencies being behind the sinking. According to Rabe, the so-called Felix Group, which included Vladimir Putin, the current president of Russia, was opposed to the wide-spread plundering that occurred after the breakup of the Soviet Union.
The window of access to Soviet military secrets slammed shut in July 1998 when Putin became director of Russia's Federal Security Service. The Voronin companies and some of the American firms that dealt with them went out of business.
According to Rabe, the sinking of Estonia is summed up: "It was the perfect coup, which could have only been carried out by secret services or groups which include former members of the secret services as members, like the networks of terrorists, regardless of their origin or motivation."
Carl Bildt and George Soros having a private conversation at the Bilderberg meeting at Chateau du Lac, near Brussels, in early June 2000. Bildt was serving as "special envoy" for the UN in the Balkans at the time. (Photo: Christopher Bollyn)
A Unique Opportunity to Help
January 13, 2018
"Every American who loves his country should read this book." - Amazon review of Solving 9-11 January 11, 2018
"Bust 9/11 and Change the World"
Save $20 off Amazon's price!
Give the gift that will open eyes about 9/11 and the fraudulent War on Terror.
Save $20 on the set of three books! Get the set (shipping included) for $50 (U.S. addresses) Order by PayPal to: firstname.lastname@example.org
The Latest 5-star Reviews
The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East A Unique Opportunity to Help December 1, 2017 This is by far the most important public affairs topic of our times. The U.S. has been hoodwinked into complicity in war crimes rivaling the great monsters of history. We must fight back and reclaim our country and our world. This book explains in a few pages, even with a little repetition, how and why this deception happened. Even though the enemies of truth are spread throughout the highest echelons of society, they can be defeated one mind at a time. And also because the enemies are so positioned, their defeat can bring reform of a dimension other countermeasures cannot. Bust 9-11 and change the world.
Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World Who are the perpetrators of 9-11? January 11, 2018 Every American who loves his country should read this book.
Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World I loved this book. January 11, 2018 I loved this book. it really exposes the deception of the U.S. government and the media of who the real culprits were behind this attack as well as their motivations. Very convincingly and very logical in following the facts and evidences and reaching a logical conclusion about who was responsible.
Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World Should be school mandated. January 2, 2018 SHOULD be a MANDATORY High school and college reading book. This is how journalism and investigative reporting should be done. What we have now in media is GARBAGE blips of BS noise.
Annotated Edition of Solving 9/11
January 10, 2018
The following is a recent review of Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World
Should be school mandated.
By Afterhourshop on January 2, 2018
Format: Paperback|Verified Purchase
SHOULD be a MANDATORY High school and college reading book. This is how journalism and investigative reporting should be done. What we have now in media is GARBAGE blips of BS noise.
This is the reason there needs to be a hard-bound, fully annotated, and indexed edition of Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World for libraries and scholars. I am working on this project and hopefully this "library edition" will be ready in the spring of 2018.
Thursday - Bollyn on Rense Radio's USS Liberty Show
January 9, 2018
Rense Radio - Thursday, Jan. 11, 2 p.m. Pacific, 5 p.m. ET
I will be on Rense Radio discussing the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty with Dave Gahary & Phil Tourney this Thursday, 2-3 pm Pacific, 5-6 pm Eastern. Phil Tourney is a survivor of the 1967 attack on the Liberty and is the author of the book "Erasing the Liberty". Understanding the murderous and intentional Israeli attack on the USS Liberty is essential to understanding 9/11.
A 1940s "wanted" poster from the Palestine Police shows three leaders of the terrorist Stern Gang: Yaacov Levstein, Yitzhak Shamir, and Nathan Yellin-Mor. Shamir went on to be prime minister of Israel. His son, Yair, is connected to the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11. Yellin-Mor is related to Gilad Atzmon, who told me that he is also related to Janet Yellin, Chairman of the Federal Reserve System. Atzmon is also related to Menachem Atzmon, the head of the Israeli company (ICTS) who controlled passenger screening operations at Boston's Logan Airport (and others) on 9/11. Another member of the Stern Gang was Benjamin Emanuel, the father of Rahm Emanuel, special adviser to both presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.
Ed Cukierman, Yair Shamir, and Boaz Harel are the key people behind Cukierman & Co., Catalyst Investments, B.O.S., and ICTS, the Israeli-owned company responsible for passenger screening operations on 9/11. Yair Shamir is the son of the notorious Zionist terrorist/criminal leader, Yitzhak Shamir.
From the Israeli Press: British Intel Reveals How Zionists Terrorized London
There is, of course, a good reason why Zionist (i.e. Israeli) history is NOT taught in our universities in the United States. It is simply because if Zionist history were taught in our schools, then Americans would quickly realize that the real terrorists are the Zionists. Terrorism has been the tool of the Zionists all along, and continues to be so to this day.
The following article from today's Israeli press (Ha'aretz) sheds some light on this history:
Coat Bomb and Explosive Prosthesis: British Intel Files Reveal How the Zionist Stern Gang Terrorized London Ha'aretz, December 2, 2017
Zionist terrorism was the main threat.
MI5 placed known extremist Jewish and Zionist groups in Britain under intense surveillance.
Stern Gang member claimed that he had “invented the book bomb.”
“The execution was perfect. I learned an important lesson. No security measures can stop sophisticated imaginative planning.” - Yaacov Levstein of the Stern Gang (i.e. LEHI)
MI5's dossiers on the group released this week cast the Cold War's early years in a stark new light: Terrorism, not the Soviet Union, was the main threat
Records declassified this week by Britain’s Security Service, MI5, reveal an urgent terrorist threat that Britain faced in the 20th century. No, it wasn’t the Irish Republican Army or Islamist terrorist groups that would plague Britain later in the century, but rather extremist Zionist groups fighting the British after World War II to establish the State of Israel.
In July 1946, one of these groups, the Irgun, led by the future Israeli prime minister and Nobel Peace Prize winner Menachem Begin, blew up the headquarters of the British administration in Palestine, Jerusalem’s King David Hotel, with heavy loss of civilian life and damage. The newly released MI5 files show that another group fighting the British, the Lehi or “Stern Gang,” dispatched cells to carry out bombings and assassinations in Britain itself. The Stern Gang is thought to be the world’s last terrorist group to describe itself publicly as “terrorist,” with some of its members using the term as a badge of honor…
SHADES OF POST-9/11 ANTHRAX LETTERS
In June 1947, two months after the attempted bombing of the Colonial Office, a Stern Gang cell operating in Italy posted 21 letter bombs to senior British politicians and cabinet members including Prime Minister Clement Attlee, Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin and Chancellor of the Exchequer Stafford, Cripps as well as Winston Churchill. Most of the letter bombs were intercepted, but some reached their intended recipients and failed to go off.
Click on link below to read the entire article in Ha'aretz:
Coat Bomb and Explosive Prosthesis: British Intel Files Reveal How the Zionist Stern Gang Terrorized London Ha'aretz, December 2, 2017
Boston Radio Show Pulled Off Air after Bollyn Interview
November 15, 2017
On September 3, I was interviewed by Ahmad Abdulibad, the host and producer of the "National Hollah Black" on WRBB at Northeastern University in Boston (104.9 FM). Shortly after the September 3 interview aired, the "National Hollah Black" program was pulled off the air after many years on WRBB because of grossly unfair accusations of "hate speech." This is the kind of censorship 9/11 truth faces in America today.
The Pentagon's Abandonment of its Own People on 9/11
November 2, 2017
"The Pentagon's functioning," Rumsfeld said on 9/11, but was it? The Pentagon's 9/11 press conference - Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, flanked by Secretary of the Army Tom White, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Hugh Shelton, and Senators John Warner (R-VA), and Carl Levin (D-MI), the Ranking Member and Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Why did the Pentagon fail to rescue its own people, and why did it turn the site of an "act of war" over to the F.B.I.?
Carol Valentine gave me a binder with some of her articles about 9/11 during my recent tour. One of the articles about the attack on the Pentagon is titled, "Pentagon RESCUE? - Open Bloody Questions..."
Valentine raises many questions in this article, some better than others, but the one that strikes me as most important is this: Why did the Pentagon turn over the site of an "act of war" to the F.B.I. on 9/11?
WHY WAS F.B.I. PUT IN CHARGE OF PENTAGON SITE?
We know the F.B.I. was in charge of the Pentagon site because the Secretary of the Army, Thomas E. White, said so during the Sept. 11, 2001 (6:42 p.m.) Dept.of Defense News Briefing.
Q: Mr. Secretary? A: Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld: Yes? Q: Can you describe the fire-fighting efforts that are going on right now in that corridor and the search-and-rescue efforts that are beginning? A: Rumsfeld: Can I describe them? Q: Yeah. A: Rumsfeld: Why don't we let the Secretary of the Army, who was out there with me a few minutes ago and has been talking to the incident commander on the site. A: Secretary of the Army Thomas E. White: I think it's fair to say at this point that the fire is contained, and will shortly, if not already, be sufficiently controlled to allow entry into the building. That entry will be supervised by the FBI, who are in charge of the site, assisted by the fire departments that are present. We, on the Army side, will support them as they go in the building and search for casualties and bring them out, then we will support them in dealing with that. That's what's going on on the ground.
Carol Valentine described this as the military abandoning their responsibilities and turning the military site of an act of war over to civilian authorities:
RUMSFELD, MILITARY, HAND THEIR JOBS TO FBI
Let's go back to the beginning, and state the obvious. The Pentagon is not your ordinary run-of the-mill office building. The Pentagon is the military headquarters for the mightiest military power on earth. It is the home of the US Navy, Army, Air Force, Marines, and Special Operations.
According to the Official Story, the 9-11 attack on the Pentagon was an act of war. Rumsfeld and the top brass had lawful jurisdiction over the piece of real estate on which the "act of war" had just occurred; the Pentagon building was a war zone. But what did Rumsfeld, Gen. Shelton, and the top brass do? On September 11, 2001, they gave jurisdiction of the war zone to the FBI — a division of the civilian Department of Justice. (Robert S. Mueller had just been appointed FBI Director the week before on September 4.)
This may sound like a small detail to some people, but it is of crucial importance. It is exactly what happened in New York City and Shanksville, Pennsylvania: The F.B.I. took over the sites and investigation, actions which resulted in the destruction of evidence and cover-up of the truth. On 9/11 the F.B.I. was under the control of a son of the Mossad, Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff, the Israeli-American dual national who ran the Criminal Division of the Dept. of Justice and who was in charge of the investigation.
Under Chertoff, rather than carrying out a blue-ribbon investigation of 9/11, the F.B.I. oversaw the cover-up of the worst act of mass murder and terrorism in U.S. history. A proper investigation of 9/11 would, therefore, have to begin with the arrest and investigation of Michael Chertoff.
Bollyn 9/11 Presentation in Washington, D.C.
November 2, 2017
Christopher Bollyn's presentation in Washington, D.C., on September 11, 2017:
Bollyn Interview with Adam Green
September 23, 2017
Recommended: Bollyn Interview on War on Terror
September 23, 2017
Christopher Bollyn was interviewed last fall at the Open Mind Conference in Denmark. The video of the interview provides an excellent analysis of the Israeli construct known as the War on Terror and explains how 9/11 is the keystone that made the war operational. This 18-minute video is recommended viewing.
Christopher Bollyn is currently on a book tour in the USA. Support his efforts to expose the deception of our time. Donate by PayPal to: email@example.com or click here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
A Blank Check for Perpetual War
July 8, 2017
"Under U.S. law it is illegal for any American to provide money or assistance to al Qaeda, ISIS or other terrorist groups. If you or I gave money, weapons, or support to al Qaeda or ISIS, we would be thrown in jail. Yet the U.S. government has been violating this law for years, quietly supporting allies and partners of al Qaeda, ISIL, Jabhat Fateh al Sham, and other terrorist groups with money, weapons, and intelligence support, in their fight to overthrow the Syrian government." – Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) introducing the Stop Arming Terrorists Act, December 8, 2016
The AUMF resolution passed after 9/11 has been used to authorize and fund more than 37 military operations in 14 countries.
Three days after 9/11, after only two hours of debate, the U.S. Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), a joint resolution giving the President the authority "to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001." Signed into law by President George W. Bush on September 18, 2001, the AUMF is the Congressional authorization that funds the War on Terror.
Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) was the only member of Congress to vote against the resolution. In her statement of September 14, 2001, Lee said:
We are not dealing with a conventional war. We cannot respond in a conventional manner. I do not want to see this spiral out of control… we must be careful not to embark on an open-ended war with neither an exit strategy nor a focused target. We cannot repeat past mistakes.
A BLANK CHECK FOR PERPETUAL WAR
Rep. Lee's warning about the AUMF spiraling "out of control" and leading to "an open-ended war" has proved prophetic. In the first sixteen years of the War on Terror the AUMF resolution has been used for more than 37 military operations in 14 countries. Operation Inherent Resolve, for example, the current U.S. military operation in Iraq and Syria against the militant group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is one of the 37 operations, although ISIL did not even exist in 2001. In September 2014, citing the AUMF, President Obama claimed that he had the authority he needed to wage war against ISIL.
After years of persistent effort, on June 29, 2017, Rep. Lee succeeded in getting her amendment that would end the 2001 AUMF authorization through the House Appropriations Committee. If the final funding bill goes through with Lee's amendment it will give Congress 240 days to debate new authorization. The 2001 authorization would be repealed at the end of the eight-month period of debate.
"I've been working on this for years and years and years. I'm just really pleased that Republicans and Democrats today really understood what I've been saying and I've been explaining for the last 16 years, and that is, this resolution is a blank check for perpetual war," Lee said after her amendment passed the committee.
Before the vote, the congressmen who spoke in support of Lee's amendment said it was high time that Congress debate the authorization for the War on Terror. Several of them stressed that Congress had failed the members of the U.S. military by not debating the wars and operations to which they had been sent.
“Any administration can rely on this blank check to wage endless war,” Lee told the committee members before the vote. "Many of us can also agree that a robust debate and vote is necessary, long overdue, and must take place."
THIS MADNESS MUST END
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) is another courageous congresswoman who has taken a stand against the duplicity of the War on Terror. In December 2016, Rep. Gabbard, an Iraq war veteran, introduced legislation which would prohibit the U.S. government from using American taxpayer dollars to provide funding, weapons, training, and intelligence support to groups like the Levant Front, Fursan al Haqq, and other allies of Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, al Qaeda, and ISIS, or to countries who are providing direct or indirect support to those same groups.
In introducing the Stop Arming Terrorists Act on December 8, 2016, Gabbard said the U.S. government has been "quietly supporting allies and partners of al Qaeda, ISIL, Jabhat Fateh al Sham and other terrorist groups with money, weapons, and intelligence support, in their fight to overthrow the Syrian government. The CIA has also been funneling weapons and money through Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and others who provide direct and indirect support to groups like ISIS and al Qaeda. This support has allowed al Qaeda and their fellow terrorist organizations to establish strongholds throughout Syria, including in Aleppo."
"This madness must end. We must stop arming terrorists," Gabbard concluded. "The Government must end this hypocrisy and abide by the same laws that apply to its’ citizens."
The legislation proposed by these two brave congresswomen indicates there is an urgent need for a real congressional debate on the AUMF and the military operations being waged under the rubric of the War on Terror. After nearly sixteen years of senseless war in Afghanistan, the fighting and dying continues and the cost of the war increases by $4 million per hour, or nearly $100 million per day, according to the National Priorities Project. The war in Afghanistan has already cost nearly $777 billion, as of July 2017, and the total cost of the wars fought since 9/11 is some $1.7 trillion. One might ask, if it weren't for Rep. Lee's amendment at what point would Congress take action to rein in the runaway War on Terror?
Rep. Gabbard's Stop Arming Terrorists Act should broaden the debate and open the discussion about the duplicity of the U.S. intervention in Syria. Gabbard's bill indicates that a covert strategy is at work that the public is generally not aware of. The U.S. has provided "direct and indirect support to groups like ISIS and al Qaeda," Gabbard said when she introduced the bill. These are the very same groups the U.S. is supposedly fighting in the War on Terror. Why would the U.S. be supporting the avowed enemy of its Operation Inherent Resolve in Syria? Shouldn't this be a subject of discussion and investigation by the media? Why isn't it?
For a person with a conventional understanding of the War on Terror, informed by the mainstream media, it certainly makes no sense that the U.S. would be supporting groups like ISIS and al Qaeda, against which it is supposedly waging war. It isn't that Rep. Gabbard is misinformed, rather it is the public that has been misinformed and deceived for years about the true purpose of the War on Terror operations, like the anti-ISIS operation in Syria and Iraq.
The fact that the U.S. and its allies have supported terrorist groups like ISIS and al Qaeda indicates that these groups are being used to advance the real strategy of the U.S.-led operation in Syria. The U.S. intervention in Syria began in 2012 under President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. In a leaked email written by Secretary Clinton in December 2012 she reveals that the U.S. policy to overthrow the Syrian government was being pursued to help Israel. Clinton's email said: "The best way to help Israel deal with Iran's growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad."
The U.S. State Department under Hillary Clinton sent fleets of Toyota trucks into Syria to whom they claimed was the “Free Syrian Army.” The trucks wound up in the hands of ISIS.
This is a very important revelation because it indicates that the real reason the U.S. has intervened in Syria is not to fight terror, but to overthrow the government because it would be "the best way to help Israel deal with Iran's growing nuclear capability." When we understand that the Israeli strategic plan (i.e. Yinon Plan) for Iraq and Syria calls for splintering these nations into ethnic or religious enclaves we can make sense of U.S. support for groups like ISIS and al Qaeda. They are being used to break up these multi-ethnic secular Arab states in order to advance the Zionist plan to dominate the Middle East.
The idea that Syria should be broken up into ethnic enclaves is pushed by Israeli officials and by the Zionist-controlled media as the only solution to the conflict. Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon, for example, at the Munich Security Conference on February 14, 2016, said:
Unfortunately we are going to face chronic instability for a very, very long period of time… And part of any grand strategy is to avoid the past, saying we are going to unify Syria. We know how to make an omelette from an egg. I don't know how to make an egg from an omelette… We should realize that we are going to see enclaves, Alawistan, Syrian Kurdistan, Syrian Druzistan. They might cooperate or fight each other.
Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon: "We should realize that we are going to see enclaves, Alawistan, Syrian Kurdistan, Syrian Druzistan. They might cooperate or fight each other."
On the same day, Ram Ben-Barak, Director General of Israel’s Intelligence Ministry, spoke on Israel's Army Radio saying, "I think that, ultimately, Syria should be turned into regions under the control of whoever is there – the Alawites where they are, the Sunnis where they are." A partition of the Syrian state along sectarian lines was "the only possible solution," Ben-Barak said.
In order to make sense of the reports of U.S. support for jihadist militants and terrorist groups in Syria it is essential to understand that the War on Terror is really just a misleading cover to deceive the public about the real operational plan at work, which is to break Syria into ethnic enclaves as called for in the Yinon Plan, "The Zionist Plan for the Middle East." With this understanding of the deceptive nature of the War on Terror we are better able to make sense of the confusing developments and reports coming from the Middle East.
Support Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time. Donate by PayPal to: firstname.lastname@example.org or by clicking here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
Media Ignores Trump Criticism of Middle Eastern Wars
June 25, 2017
President Trump on the Wasted Lives and Money in the Middle East Wars
"As of a few months ago, our country has spent $6 trillion in the Middle East, wasted. And the lives, the lives, thousands and thousands and thousands of lives. $6 trillion and thousands of young, beautiful lives.
"We started 16 years ago and it's in far worse shape than it was 16 years ago by many times over. So, we spent all of this money, all of these lives.
"And let me tell you, I came in and took over a very, very difficult hand. But we're going to get it fixed. That's what you put me here for. We're going to get it fixed." - President Donald Trump, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, June 21, 2017
President Trump Holds Rally in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, June 21, 2017 Comment on Wasted Lives and Money in Middle East begins at 10:30 on timeline. Video Link - youtu.be/H4ILRco6CNo
The Media Ignored this Comment like Trump Never Said It
What is most significant about Trump's common-sense comment on the money and lives wasted on the post-9/11 wars in the Middle East is that the media completely ignored this comment. The same media that spins articles from every Trump tweet concerning Russian "interference" in the election ignored this important comment made by the commander-in-chief about the wars in the Middle East and delivered in a speech on June 21. This fact says a great deal about who is deceiving the people about the War on Terror - and who is not. The controlled media has, after all, consistently supported the deception of 9/11 and the fraudulent War on Terror.
Of the media products that suggest prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks, the Iron Man cartoon that aired on October 22, 1994, must be at the top of the list because the 17-minute television cartoon depicts a plane and missiles hitting the Twin Towers and a plane smashing into the Pentagon in the first minute. The 52-second video clip (above) from the episode entitled "The Grim Reaper Wears a Teflon Coat" shows these depictions.
Because this program clearly suggests prior knowledge of the 9/11 plot to attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the first question to be asked is, who produced this program?
The producers of "The Grim Reaper Wears a Teflon Coat" episode in which the Twin Towers and Pentagon are attacked are the Israeli Avi Arad and Stan Lee, born Stanley Martin Lieber in New York City.
The strike on the Pentagon as depicted in the cartoon by Avi Arad and Stan Lee
Avi Arad is an Israeli producer who has worked closely with Arnon Milchan, the senior Israeli agent in Hollywood who smuggled nuclear triggers for Israel's nuclear arsenal in the 1980s. Here Arad and Milchan are seen at the premiere of their film Daredevil in February 2003. Milchan also made a film depicting an airplane attack on a high-rise tower in New York.
Milchan's first film, The Medusa Touch (1978), depicted a large plane striking the Pan Am Building in New York City. Milchan has worked closely with Israeli military intelligence all of his adult life.
When agents of a foreign government, like the criminal Arnon Milchan and Avi Arad, produce films and television programs that clearly indicate prescience of an attack that later occurs, why are they not arrested and interrogated on suspicion of having prior knowledge of the attacks? The fact that these Israelis made films depicting the 9/11 attacks years before they actually occurred shows that the planning by Israeli military intelligence of the 9/11 attacks goes back to the 1970s, when the Likud party of Menachem Begin came to power. The planning for the 9/11 attacks in the late 1970s coincides with the planning, by Israeli military intelligence, for the War on Terror to deceive the U.S. military into waging war against Israel's enemies on behalf of the Zionist state. The Israeli-designed terrorism of 9/11 was carried out to kick-start their long-planned War on Terror.
Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts. Donate by PayPal to: email@example.com or click here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
Gen. Wesley Clark on Israel's 9/11 Policy Coup at the Pentagon
June 15, 2017
What happened on 9/11 is that we didn't have a strategy, we didn't have bipartisan agreement, we didn't have American understanding of it, and we had instead a policy coup in this country – a coup – a policy coup. Some hard-nose people took over the direction of American policy and they never bothered to inform the rest of us…
Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, if you're an American you ought to be concerned about the strategy of the United States in this region. What is our aim? What is our purpose? Why are we there? Why are Americans dying in this region? That is the issue. – General Wesley Clark, Commonwealth Club of California, San Francisco, October 3, 2007
Seven years ago, Gen. Wesley Clark revealed the post-9/11 Pentagon memo to "take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off, Iran."
This memo and the super-aggressive war agenda behind it baffled Gen. Clark and the Pentagon brass because it was an Israeli war agenda that was being imposed on the U.S. military in the aftermath of the 9/11 terror attacks. As Clark said about 9/11, "we didn't have American understanding of it," suggesting there was a non-American "understanding" of 9/11 that was behind the coup and the war agenda.
The Israeli war agenda of seven countries in five years was imposed through the Zionist Neo-Cons who reigned on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board: Paul Wolfowitz, Dov Zakheim, and Douglas Feith, among others. The photo below shows them meeting with the Israeli Chief of Staff, Shaul Mofaz, shortly after 9/11.
Hillary Clinton's emails as Secretary of State prove that Obama's policy to use force to overthrow the government of Syria was being done because it was "the best way to help Israel." This is evidence of complicity in a "war of aggression" - the supreme war crime.
9/11 was carried out by Israeli military intelligence in order to kick-start their war agenda under the guise of waging the War on Terror. Israeli military intelligence is clearly the mastermind behind both 9/11 and the aggressive war agenda in the Middle East. The United States has been engaged in carrying out this foreign war agenda for nearly 16 years at great expense to our nation - and the world. We need to grasp the Zionist deception behind 9/11 and the War on Terror and demand that our political leaders and media call for an end to the madness.
Support Christopher Bollyn's work. Donate by PayPal to: firstname.lastname@example.org or click here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
U.S. Co-operation with ISIS Revealed in Mainstream Media
June 9, 2017
“Everything the West is doing in Syria is against international law.” - Former German Defense Minister Willy Wimmer, 26 October 2016
It is now being reported in the mainstream media that U.S. forces are working with ISIS and other mercenary forces in Syria to overthrow the elected government of that nation. Will Americans accept the ISIS scam that is becoming more obvious every day?
The U.S. and its allies, especially Israel, have created ISIS and the war in Syria, which now appears to be approaching the end-game.
On Friday afternoon, June 9, a story was published by the Associated Press (and mainstream media sites across America) about how the United States appears to be working with ISIS terrorists in Syria against the elected government of Bashar al Assad. The source of the claim was the commander of Russian forces in Syria:
Col. Gen. Sergei Surovikin, the commander of Russian forces in Syria, said IS made a deal earlier this month with the Kurdish forces to leave two villages southwest of Raqqa and move toward Palmyra.
Surovikin said the U.S.-led coalition along with the allied Kurds "collude with the leaders of the IS, who surrender the areas under their control and head to provinces where Syrian government forces operate."
"There is an impression that under the slogan of fighting international terrorism in Syria the Americans are using IS to offer resistance to government forces' advances," he said at a briefing...
Surovikin also criticized the U.S. for trying to block Syrian government forces from taking control of the country's southern border.
He said that Syrian government troops had secured territorial gains in the southern Suwayda province near the Jordanian border, but encountered resistance from the U.S.-led coalition.
The U.S. has dealt the Syrian government and its allied troops several blows near Tanf close to the border with Jordan, where the U.S. trains Syrian opposition forces.
Surovikin dismissed the U.S. argument that Syrian government forces there posed a threat to the training camp as "absurd" and criticized Washington's action as a violation of Syria's sovereign right to protect its border.
Col. Gen. Sergei Rudskoi of the Russian military's General Staff also questioned the U.S. role in Syria.
"Having declared the goal of fighting international terrorism, the coalition strikes Syrian troops while letting IS militants exit the encircled areas unhampered, thus boosting terrorist groupings around Palmyra and Deir el-Zour," he said. "It raises a question why they do it and what their real goals are."
This AP story, written by Vladimir Isachenkov in Moscow, is the first mainstream media story that addresses the obvious fakeness of the U.S. military policy vis-a-vis ISIS and other terrorist groups in Syria. Americans have been led to believe that U.S. forces in Syria are fighting ISIS, but U.S. actions in the past few weeks, especially in the southern desert near al Tanf near the Syrian border with Jordan and Iraq, have clearly revealed that U.S. forces are waging an illegal war in Syria against the government of Syria.
The statements by senior Russian commanders, who are in Syria at the behest of the Syrian government to fight terrorists, will be difficult for many Americans to understand because they deal with the duplicitous nature of the War on Terror, a subject which has not been discussed in the controlled mainstream media. It will be hard for the Pentagon to explain their way out of this. It seems that the cat is now out of the bag.
The same Russian commanders also said that the war in Syria will soon be over. On the same day, Syrian government forces went around the illegal U.S. garrison near al Tanf and reached the border with Iraq. This is the first time in three years that Syria has had control of a section of the border with Iraq. This also means that the U.S. garrison at al Tanf is surrounded by Syrian government forces. The only way out for the U.S. coalition forces in al Tanf would be to retreat into Jordan - or fight their way through Syrian government-held territory to go... where?
It seems that the Russians are probably right about all of these things and that we are finally approaching the end of the war in Syria. The U.S. position in Syria is illegal and unsustainable. President Trump would have been smarter to have ended U.S. involvement in Syria on Day One and withdrawn all U.S. military personnel. That would have shown true leadership with a bold change of course removing the United States from what has been a secret and sordid war of terror and aggression.
It will be hard for the U.S. and its allies to admit defeat and quit Syria, but the sooner they do, the better for all concerned.
Support Christopher Bollyn's work. Your support is needed! Donate by PayPal to: email@example.com or click here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
Willy Wimmer: I think it is vital and necessary to look for relief for the humanitarian problems we have in Syria. And I think we should stop the killing as soon as possible. That is one thing we have to take into consideration. On the other side, we should never forget who started the civil war in Syria and when these human rights organizations blame one country in particular, we should never forget that the US, Great Britain, France, Saudi Arabia and Qatar created a civil war in Syria. I won’t mention Israel because of the situation in the neighborhood.
When we complain about the human suffering in Syria, we have to take into consideration who started everything. And the interesting thing is that everything the West is doing in Syria is against international law; they have no support of the UN Charter, even what the German militaries are doing there is against our Constitution. The only power which is in accordance with international law in Syria is the Russian Federation and because the actual president who had been elected freely, as for the support, it is in accordance with the international law. We have to take this into consideration when it comes to accusations from Human Rights Watch and others.
Source: "Russia only country in Syria acting under int'l law - German statesman Willy Wimmer," RT.com, 25 October 2016
Support Christopher Bollyn's work. Your support is needed! Donate by PayPal to: firstname.lastname@example.org or click here: www.bollyn.com/donate/
The Zionist Obstruction of Justice for 9-11 Victims
May 26, 2017 This is a restored article. The original article is titled "The Zionist Obstruction of Justice for 9-11 Victims," September 12, 2008, on Bollyn.info (site confiscated in January 2009). It is also in my book, Solving 9/11: The Original Articles (pp. 223-230). Original archived at: web.archive.org/web/20080915024104/http://www.bollyn.info:80/
We should have lost our memories as well as our voices, were it as easy to forget as to be silent. - Tacitus, Agricola
Michael Chertoff, the nation's top domestic security official, is an Israeli national whose mother was a Mossad agent. Chertoff is the key Zionist agent who has managed the "non-investigation" of 9-11, ordered the massive destruction of evidence, and censored the information that would expose the Israeli role in the crime of the century.
9-11 LITIGATION UPDATE
The Zionist Obstruction of Justice for 9-11 Victims
Alvin Hellerstein, the federal judge hearing the 9-11 lawsuits, is a Zionist devoted to the State of Israel.
His Talmud-thumping son has lived on a extremist Zionist settlement on the Israeli-occupied West Bank since 2001.
The key defendant in the 9-11 tort litigation is an Israeli airline security company owned by a convicted Likud criminal tied to Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert, who made a secret visit to New York City the