Print Contact Articles by Subject 9-11 Archive 2006

Is Ariel Sharon the Mastermind of 9-11?

January 13, 2006

The controlled media whitewashes Ariel Sharon's long history as a master of terrorism in the same way that it censors all discussion of the evidence of Israeli military intelligence being involved in the terror attacks of 9-11. Yet, the question remains: Is Sharon the terrorist mastermind behind 9-11?
 
As the Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon was hospitalized following a massive stroke on January 4, reporters from the controlled media held a vigil outside Jerusalem's Hadassah Hospital where Israel's 77-year old leader lay in a drug-induced coma. The media spotlight on the comatose veteran military commander avoided mentioning Sharon's long career as a master terrorist and the many massacres and war crimes he has been involved in.
 
The New York Times and CNN, who describe Sharon as "a hawk-turned-statesman," allowed Benjamin Netanyahu, an Israeli politician from the same extreme right-wing Zionist movement as Sharon, to define the prime minister as a heroic figure without raising a single question about the thousands of innocent Palestinian lives snuffed out since he came to power in 2001. The U.S. media focus on the ailing Zionist leader ignores the documented evidence of Sharon's 58-year history as a master of terrorism who has ruthlessly used terror as a weapon and a tool to achieve his strategic and political goals. Sharon's primary strategic goal has always been to build a fortified Jewish ghetto-state in Palestine. As a 19-year-old son of Russian Zionist immigrants, Sharon fought in the Latrun offensive during the 1948 war in which Israeli forces seized a strategic wedge-shaped piece of Palestinian land leading to Jerusalem.
 
"The myth of 'Sharon's Legacy' was already beginning to form" as he lay in the hospital, Israeli peace activist and author Uri Avnery wrote in his article, "The Israeli Napoleon." The left, Avnery says, "who only yesterday had cursed Sharon as the murderer of Kibieh [Kibya], the butcher of Sabra and Shatila, and the man responsible for the plunder and slaughter in the occupied Palestinian territories, began to admire him as the 'Man of Peace.'
 
"Settlers, who had condemned him as a traitor, remembered that it was he who had created the settlements and kept on enlarging them to this day. Only yesterday he was one of the most hated people in Israel and the world," Avnery wrote. "Today, after the evacuation of Gush Katif [in Gaza], he has become the darling of the public, almost from wall to wall. The leaders of nations crowned him as the 'great warrior who has turned into a hero of peace.'
 
"All these analyses have only one thing in common," Avnery said, "they have nothing to do with the real Ariel Sharon. They are based on ignorance, illusion and self-deception.
 
"He has not changed at all," Avnery, who has "personal knowledge" of Sharon, said. "He stayed true to his fundamental approach, only adapting his slogans to changing times and circumstances. His master-plan remained as it was at the beginning. Underlying his world view is a simplistic, 19th century style nationalism, which says: our people stands above all others, other people are inferior. The rights of our nation are sacred; other nations have no rights at all. The rules of morality apply only to relations within the nation, not to relations between nations," Avnery wrote.
 
"On this moral base the aim emerged: to establish a Jewish state, as large as possible, free of non-Jews. That could lead to the conclusion that the ethnic cleansing, begun by Ben-Gurion in 1948, when half the Palestinians were deprived of their homes and land, must be completed," Avnery wrote. "Sharon's career began shortly after, when he was appointed to lead the undercover commando Unit 101, whose murderous actions beyond the borders were designed mainly to prevent the refugees from infiltrating back to their villages."
 
SHARON THE TERRORIST
 
A salient fact of Israeli history, generally ignored by the Zionist-controlled press, is that several Israeli prime ministers were terrorists who bombed and murdered their way to the top. Menachem Begin, Itzchak Shamir, and Ariel Sharon were all well-known terrorists who later became Israeli prime ministers.
 
Sharon, for example, commanded a terrorist massacre in Kibya, a West Bank village, which was then Jordanian in 1953. This particular raid had a profound impact on US-Israeli relations. In the middle of the night of October 14, 1953, Sharon led his Unit 101 across the border and into the defenseless sleeping village. Using automatic weapons and grenades, Sharon and his men forced fleeing residents back into their homes and used dynamite to blow up 41 homes and a school -- with the people inside. Sixty-nine civilians were slaughtered. The massacre and demolition lasted seven hours. Days later the U.S. State Department issued a statement calling the Kibya massacre "shocking" and confirming that aid to Israel had been suspended. This was the first and only time that an American president cut off all aid to Israel.
 
While a sympathetic Israeli journalist on CNN described Sharon as "a biblical hero," it should be remembered that the so-called "hawk-turned-statesman" is personally responsible for much of the terrorism, violence, and instability that has plagued Palestine, Israel, and the Middle East during the past six decades. Sharon, for example, as Israel's defense minister, commanded the illegal invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and was later removed from that position when an Israeli commission of inquiry found that he had "personal responsibility" for the massacres that occurred in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila in September 1982. The death toll from the three-day massacre, which occurred in camps under Israeli control and with the support and assistance of Israeli forces, is estimated to be more than 3,000 lives, mostly women and children. Sharon was "the biggest liar this side of the Mediterranean" and a man whose "word was worth nothing," Philip Habib, the U.S. Special Envoy to Lebanon, said at the time.
 
Eighteen years later, Sharon single-handedly provoked the Palestinian uprising known as the Al Aqsa Intifada by invading, with scores of heavily-armed Israeli troops, the most sacred Muslim site in Jerusalem on Sept. 28, 2000. The subsequent Israeli military response resulted in 25 Palestinian civilians being killed for every Israeli death. Supposedly to quell the violence, which he had personally brought about, Sharon then authorized the building of a hideous fortified barrier wall, not unlike that which separated East and West Germany, illegally appropriating a great deal of Palestinian land in the process.
 
In the weeks and months after 9-11, Sharon was a frequent visitor to the White House, where he held secret discussions with President George W. Bush. As the U.S. invaded and occupied Afghanistan, the Israeli military carried out a brutal invasion and re-occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. In April 2002, the Israeli army besieged and attacked the Palestinian refugee camp of Jenin using bulldozers to destroy houses with the inhabitants still inside. Sharon's frequent use of bulldozers to destroy Palestinian homes and orchards has earned him the moniker "the Bulldozer." Sharon then refused United Nations investigators access to the devastated camp, in which crimes against humanity had clearly been committed.
 
SHARON AND 9-11
 
As reported since September 2001, there is a great deal of evidence that Israel's military intelligence was involved in the terror attacks of 9-11, which raises the obvious question about Sharon's personal role in the events that launched the War on Terror. Logically, the evidence offers two options: either Sharon as prime minister had prior knowledge of 9-11 and is one of the chief architects of the terror attacks or the Mossad, Israel's military intelligence agency, is under the command of an outside authority, and was involved in a massive covert operation in the United States without the knowledge of the prime minister.
 
For the following reasons, the second option seems highly unlikely:
 
Were the hordes of Israeli intelligence agents, including some 200 fake movers and art students nabbed by police in the United States in connection with the terror attacks of 9-11, simply part of a rogue operation, which Sharon, the master of Israeli state-sponsored terrorism, was completely unaware of? Did the Mossad establish phony moving companies in the New York City area and have dozens of agents with prior knowledge, like those arrested in New Jersey on 9-11, running around the country in moving vans without the prime minister knowing? Were the Odigo instant text message warnings, which clearly showed prior knowledge of the attacks and which were received by Israeli employees of the Mossad-operated company hours before the first plane hit, being sent between agents of a rogue terror network of which Sharon had no control or knowledge?
 
Because the evidence clearly points to Israeli state involvement the controlled press in the United States has censored any discussion of Mossad's involvement in the terror attacks of 9-11. Therefore, the obvious question concerning Sharon is never asked: Is he the terrorist mastermind behind 9-11?
 
While the controlled media seeks to whitewash Sharon's career as a master of terrorism, the evidence indicates that he was involved in 9-11 and that the Zionist-controlled media is complicit in a conspiracy to cover-up the evidence. This is to say that Sharon is one of the chief architects of the 9-11 terror attacks. Zionist agents in key positions in the U.S. government, like Michael Chertoff at the Dept. of Justice, the son of one of Israel's first Mossad agents, facilitated the 9-11 cover-up by releasing scores of arrested Israeli intelligence agents and assigning blame to Muslims in order to start the War on Terror.
 
Ignoring Sharon's criminal record put American interests and lives in peril, this writer wrote in February 2001. After the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution on Feb. 13, 2001, congratulating the newly-elected Israeli prime minister, I warned that to ignore Sharon's long history of state-sponsored terrorism and war crimes endangered the American people on whose behalf Congress had extended "the best wishes."
 
"To ignore Sharon's Machiavellian character and criminal record may very well put American interests and lives in peril," I wrote then. "Sharon has a history of duplicity and has betrayed the United States in the past."
 
"In a minimally just world Sharon would be behind bars," the American author Edward S. Herman wrote in June 2002. "Sharon is treated in the West as a respected statesman, even called a 'man of peace' by George W. Bush in the wake of Sharon's new war crimes at Jenin, Nablus, Bethlehem, and other West Bank towns. This treatment of Sharon has one great merit," Herman wrote, "it makes crystal clear that the 'war on terror' is a 'war of terror.'"

The Ties between Netanyahu and Silverstein

February 23, 2006

Although there is a preponderance of evidence to support the thesis that the Israeli intelligence was involved in the terror attacks of 9-11, I am the only journalist who has seriously pursued this line of inquiry since 2001.
 
During the 9-11 Truth Tour in Europe with Jimmy Walter I was prevented from speaking in Vienna only because of the content of my speech. I was the only speaker who discussed the evidence that Israel was involved in the planning and execution of 9-11. Central to my thesis is the fact that U.S.-based Zionist agents such as Michael Chertoff, Rupert Murdoch, the lease holders Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy, the chairman of the port authority Lewis M. Eisenberg, the head of the fake moving company Dominic Suter, and many others were part of a large and complex plot designed by architect-level planners within the Israeli political and intelligence elite.
 
Near the top of this pile is a man named Benjamin Netanyahu, who happens to be running for prime minister in Israel next month. Netanyahu wrote a book in 1986 about his main thesis which is "the war on terror."
Netanyahu is the Israeli politician who coined the phrase and called on the western democracies to join the "war on terror" against Israel's enemies. Netanyahu is one of the architects of 9-11 and was instrumental in pulling the strings of the actors involved in this complex plot. An article in the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz from November 2001 shows just how close Netanyahu is with Larry Silverstein, who controlled the three buildings that were demolished on 9-11.
 
The Ha'aretz article by Sara Leibovich-Dar reveals the "close ties with Netanyahu" that Silverstein has. "The two have been on friendly terms since Netanyahu's stint as Israel's ambassador to the United Nations. For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein. It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance," the Israeli newspaper reported. The article in entitled "Up in Smoke," which is an appropriate title because that is exactly where the evidence pointing to Israeli involvement in 9-11 has gone thanks to the Zionist-controlled press in the United States - up in smoke.

The Judicial Hijacking of the 9-11 Victim Lawsuits

April 14, 2006

While the media plays up the significance of the government show trial of the seemingly deranged "20th hijacker" Zacharias Moussaoui, not one 9-11 victim's lawsuit has been allowed to be heard in a trial by jury. Why have the 9-11 victims' families not been given the same right to have their cases heard in an open trial?
 
Ellen Mariani, who lost her husband Neil on United Air Lines (UAL) Flight 175, filed the first 9-11 wrongful death lawsuit against UAL on December 20, 2001. Interviewed on national television in May 2002 by Bill O'Reilly of FOX News, O'Reilly repeatedly questioned Mariani about why she had chosen to pursue litigation instead of accepting the government fund.
 
"I want justice," Mariani said. "I want accountability. Who is responsible? I want the truth." Today, Mariani, like the other 9-11 plaintiffs, is under a legal gag order which prevents her from speaking about her on-going lawsuit. Likewise, thousands of employees of federal agencies, such as the Federal Aviation Administration, have received secret gag orders in the mail preventing them from speaking about what they know about the events of 9-11.
 
After more than four years, however, Mariani's determined pursuit for the truth about 9-11 through the court system has failed to yield any answers or discovery about who is responsible for 9-11. Today, she is no closer to obtaining what she has clearly and repeatedly said she wanted from the beginning – a jury trial. Why have the many victims' cases like Mariani's, brought by relatives of loved ones lost on 9-11, not been heard in open trials with juries -- a basic American right? And why has the Israeli-owned airline security company involved in the shocking security lapses, which apparently enabled the attacks of 9-11, been granted complete immunity by the U.S. Congress?
 
All of the relatives' wrongful death lawsuits, i.e. criminal cases against the airlines and their security companies, were consolidated by the presiding judge into a negligence lawsuit, which, as a civil case, is much less likely to be argued or investigated in an open trial with a jury. All the 9-11 wrongful death and personal injury cases against either American Air Lines (AA) or United Air Lines or any of the foreign-owned airport security companies, namely Argenbright Security (British), Globe Aviation Services Corp. (Swedish), and Huntleigh USA Corp. (Israeli) have been handled by United States District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York.
 
In the case of at least one of these security defendants, Huntleigh USA, there would seem to be a serious conflict of interest for the judge because the airline security company who is responsible for the shocking security lapses at both the Boston and Newark airports on 9-11 is a wholly-owned subsidiary of an Israeli company (ICTS) headed by Israelis with clear ties to Israel's military intelligence agency, the Mossad. Judge Hellerstein, on the other hand, has deep and long-standing Zionist connections and close family ties to the state of Israel. A Zionist is a supporter of the Jewish state of Israel. Judge Hellerstein's wife, for example, is a former senior vice president and current treasurer of a New York-based Zionist organization called AMIT. AMIT promotes Jewish immigration to Israel and stands for Americans for Israel and Torah. AMIT's motto is "Building Israel -- One Child at a Time."
 
Judge Hellerstein, 73, is also a long-time member of The Jewish Center of New York and a former president of the Board of Jewish Education of Greater New York. This raises the obvious question about why, in the 9-11 terror case in which an Israeli security company is a key defendant and in which individuals from Israeli military intelligence are suspected of being involved, was Hellerstein chosen to preside over all 9-11 victim lawsuits -- and who chose him?
 
Huntleigh USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Israeli company called International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) International N.V., a Netherlands-based aviation and transportation security firm headed by "former [Israeli] military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies."
 
Menachem Atzmon, convicted in Israel in 1996 for campaign finance fraud, and his business partner Ezra Harel, took over management of security at the Boston and Newark airports when their company, ICTS, bought Huntleigh USA in 1999. UAL Flight 175 and AA 11, which allegedly struck the twin towers, both originated in Boston, while UAL 93, which supposedly crashed in Pennsylvania, departed from the Newark airport.
 
ICTS also operates the German port of Rostock on the Baltic Sea. An Israeli company linked to the Mossad runs the port operations of a major German harbor. Why would the Israeli intelligence agents want to run a German port?
 
Some victims' families brought lawsuits against Huntleigh claiming the Israeli-owned airport security firm had been grossly negligent on 9-11. While these relatives have a right to discovery and to know what Huntleigh did or did not do to protect their loved ones on 9-11, Huntleigh was granted complete congressional protection in 2002 and will not be called to account for its actions on 9-11 in any U.S. court.
 
On July 26, 2002, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Homeland Security Bill and slipped in a last-minute provision which provided complete corporate immunity for the three foreign-owned security companies. Likewise, the Senate voted to shield the three security companies from corporate responsibility on November 19, 2002. These congressional votes effectively prevent any legal investigation or discovery into the security failures of these foreign companies on 9-11.
 
Hellerstein, however, is not the only player overseeing the 9-11 litigation process who has close ties to Israel. In fact, all of the key players and law firms involved are either active Zionists or do a great deal of business representing Israeli companies and/or the state of Israel. Kenneth R. Feinberg, for example, the special master of the federally-funded Victims' Compensation Fund, is also a deeply dedicated Zionist. Feinberg single-handedly administered the $7 billion fund that paid out U.S. taxpayer money to some 97 percent of the families who could have otherwise used the courts to sue to recover tort damages for monetary loss and pain and suffering.
 
The families who accepted the Feinberg administrated federal fund signed away their right to litigate against the government, the airlines or the security companies. This federally funded pay-off to the families effectively prevented nearly all of the relatives from using the courts to obtain justice or truth through the legal process, which would have brought discovery of facts and events of 9-11.
 
The Kenneth Feinberg Group is listed as one of the top ten supporters of the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies for 2004-2005. The Jerusalem Institute is an Israel-based Zionist organization that supports the building of the illegal separation wall across Palestine, for example. The Feinberg Group also lists as its clients major insurance and re-insurance companies such as Lloyd's of London. These are the companies who stood to lose billions of dollars if 9-11 victims' lawsuits had gone forward.
 
Feinberg was appointed special master by then Attorney General John Ashcroft. Ashcroft, a dedicated Christian Zionist and supporter of such groups as Stand for Israel, is today working as a lobbyist for Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI), Israel's major military aerospace company, which hired the former U.S. Attorney General to help secure the U.S. government's approval to sell an Israeli weapons system to the South Korean Air Force.
 
The Israelis hired Ashcroft to improve their chances against an American-made system built by Chicago-based Boeing Co. Ashcroft, who was born in Chicago, is the former head of the Dept. of Justice, where his Israeli-American assistant, Michael Chertoff, directed the FBI non-investigation of the events of 9-11. Ashcroft is now being paid by the state of Israel to work against the interests of an American company - and the United States.

The White Flames of Thermite

April 21, 2006


THE WHITE FLAMES OF THERMITE - The bright white reaction producing a whitish smoke in this photo appears to be Thermite on the end of a column.  This photo shows the eastern corner of the South Tower, at the 81st floor, at the same time that a massive cascade of molten metal was flowing from this floor a few windows away. This thermitic reaction appears to be occurring on the end of a column which has fallen through the corner.

In his paper, "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation," Prof. Thomas Eagar of MIT wrote:
 
"Some reports suggest that the aluminum from the aircraft ignited, creating very high temperatures. While it is possible to ignite aluminum under special conditions, such conditions are not commonly attained in a hydrocarbon-based diffuse flame. In addition, the flame would be white hot, like a giant sparkler. There was no evidence of such aluminum ignition, which would have been visible even through the dense soot."
 
Eagar is apparently unaware of photographs and videos of the World Trade Center towers that show exactly the white flames that occur when thermite reacts producing molten iron and aluminum oxide. In the process steel can be cut like butter.
 
When sulphur is added to the aluminum-ferrous oxide mixture, the compound is known as thermate and the steel cutting capability is greatly increased because the melting temperature of the steel is lowered. In this case the steel columns of the WTC could have been cut as easily as a warm knife slicing through butter.
 
This white flame is located at the same corner of the South Tower, at the 81st floor, at the same time as the cascade of molten metal flowed from the corner - at the same level. This thermite reaction appears to be occurring on the end of a column which has fallen through the corner. In the previous photo one can see that this metal column appears to have fallen through the corner.
 
This white flame is producing whitish oxides - exactly what one would find with a thermite reaction. This is the aluminum oxide that is produced in the reaction. The other products are molten iron and an immense amount of heat. Clearly something was burning white hot on steel columns at the 81st floor area and creating a large amount of molten iron. What was burning here - if not thermite or thermate?  

The Censored Evidence of Thermite

April 27, 2006

A highly-respected physicist explains how Thermite may have been used to cut the critical core columns and produce the large amounts of molten iron seen at the World Trade Center, but the controlled media and scientists refuse to look at the evidence.
 
PROVO, Utah - "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act," the British writer George Orwell said. Orwell's words aptly describe the situation of Steven E. Jones, a soft-spoken professor at Brigham Young University (BYU), who has turned his scientific mind to the unanswered questions of 9-11.
 
Provo, the home of BYU, is America's most conservative city in its most Republican county. With more than 85 percent of the population supporting President George W. Bush, Provo seems an unlikely place for any "revolutionary act" -- unless that act meant simply "telling the truth."
 
On the picturesque campus of the private Mormon university, surrounded by snow-capped peaks, Jones teaches physics and carries out research in the fields of metal-catalyzed fusion, solar energy, and archaeometry. As an archaeometrist, Jones applies physics to explain events in the past. Since he became aware of the unanswered questions of 9-11 in 2005, Jones has focused his attention on the available data and evidence.
 
The unexplained presence of large amounts of molten iron at the WTC puzzled Jones and he contacted me to confirm the reports in my articles from 2002. These reports came to me directly from two men closely involved in the removal of the rubble: Peter Tully of Tully Construction of Flushing, N.Y., and Mark Loizeaux of Controlled Demolition, Inc. of Phoenix, Md.
 
Tully told me that he had seen pools of "literally molten steel" in the rubble. Loizeaux confirmed this: "Yes, hot spots of molten steel in the basements," he said, "at the bottom of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven levels." The molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed," he said. He confirmed that molten steel was also found at WTC 7, which mysteriously collapsed in the late afternoon.
 
Last November, Jones first presented his ideas in a draft which has since evolved into a 52-page scientific paper. His paper begins with a clear appeal for "a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges." Jones presents photographic and scientific evidence that an aluminothermic reaction using a form of Thermite was most likely used to weaken and sever the 47 massive core columns that held up the towers. The official version utterly fails to explain how these critical columns failed.
 
Thermite, however, a combination of finely ground aluminum and iron oxide (rust), cuts through steel like a "warm knife through butter," Jones said, especially when mixed with 2 percent sulfur. The resulting eutectic combination, called Thermate, lowers the melting point of steel.
 
Thermite was patented in Germany by Hans Goldschmidt in the late 1800s. Extremely high temperatures are produced when the aluminum and iron oxide react. The reaction produces temperatures of more than 2,500 degrees Celsius (4,500 degrees F) as the ferric oxide is reduced to molten iron. Iron melts at 1,535 degrees C.
 
The reaction causes the oxygen from the ferric oxide to bond with the aluminum, producing aluminum oxide, molten iron, and approximately 750 kilocalories per gram of Thermite. The aluminum oxide is a whitish smoke, which was also observed in large amounts on 9-11.
 
I recently attended a presentation of Jones' 9-11 research at BYU. Jones began with footage of the unexplained collapse of Larry Silverstein's 47-story building, WTC 7, at 5:25 p.m. When Jones was interviewed by Tucker Carlson of MSNBC, the producers refused to air this short but crucial video segment. I also observed Thermite reactions in Jones' physics class. As a colleague combined the powdered rust and aluminum in a mounted ceramic flower pot, Jones filmed the reaction. A paper wick with magnesium ignited the sand-like mixture. The reaction was intense, nearly explosive, and white flames and pieces of metal flew out of the pot. From the bottom poured a white-hot liquid -- pure molten iron. After a few seconds a glowing yellow-hot piece of iron was lifted with tongs and shown to the students.
 
Because Thermite does not require air, it can react underwater or in an oxygen-starved environment, which may explain the persistent hot spots that existed for weeks in the rubble completely unaffected by the continuous dousing with fire hoses. The scientific literature on Thermite says that the white-hot molten iron and slag it produces can itself prolong and extend the heating and incendiary action.
 
"As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running," Leslie Robertson, structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, told fellow engineers. Footage taken by WABC-TV of the burning South Tower at 9:53 a.m., immediately before the building collapsed, reveals large amounts of white-hot molten metal, presumably iron, pouring from the 81st floor of the east corner. The amount of spilling molten metal suggests that a pool of molten iron was produced in that area of the building.
 
While some have suggested that the molten metal was aluminum, this challenged by the fact that molten aluminum appears silver-grey in daylight. The only possible explanation is that the white-hot metal gushing from the South Tower was molten iron and had been produced by a very large amount of Thermite.
 
The amount of molten metal seen falling would indicate that tons of Thermite had been used on that floor. From the video footage it appears that several cubic meters of molten metal fell, which, if iron, would have weighed about 8.65 tons each.
 
"I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports," Jones writes, which claim "that fires plus impact damage alone caused complete collapses of all three buildings." He challenges the official explanation and provides evidence to support the controlled-demolition hypothesis, which, he says "is suggested by the available data, testable and falsifiable." Jones notes that the hypothesis that the towers were demolished by explosives "has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the U.S. government."
 
Ignoring the evidence of the controlled-demolition hypothesis, the FEMA-sponsored study of 2002 concluded, "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown." Furthermore, the official report found that the fire-induced collapse hypothesis "has only a low probability of occurrence."
 
"Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue," the engineers concluded. "That is precisely the point," Jones says, "further investigation and analyses are indeed needed, including serious consideration of the controlled-demolition hypothesis which is neglected in all of the government reports." The fact that the 9-11 Commission report does not even mention the collapse of WTC 7 "is a striking omission of data highly relevant to the question of what really happened on 9-11," he said.
 
Further investigation is what Jones is trying to get other scientists to do. One would think that the mainstream media would be interested in a highly-respected physicist answering questions about 9-11, but that has not been the case. The controlled media and supporters of the official version completely avoid Jones. Like a modern-day Galileo, Jones has exposed the flaws in the official version, "a myth," he says, "which has taken on religious proportions."
 
"There is a clear disconnect between what the official reports say happened and what actually happened," Jones says. "A scientific theory has to be falsifiable. It must be able to be tested and challenged. The data stands on its own. Where are the honest scientists?" Jones asks. "Take the blinders off and find out what happened."
 
The official 9-11 reports are what Jones calls "pathological science," in which investigators ignore all evidence that contradicts the conclusion they have been asked to prove. I contacted three scientists who support the official theory to ask if they would review Jones' paper.
 
Thomas W. Eagar of MIT refused to even look at the paper and said there is no evidence of molten metal pouring from the WTC. Challenged with the evidence, he hung up the phone.
 
Zdenek P. Bazant of Northwestern University submitted his fire-induced collapse theory to the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) two days after 9-11, without examining any evidence. Asked if he would review Jones' paper, Bazant also refused, "I have seen Jones' fiction before. If you want my private opinion, it is nothing but sensationalism," he said. "His purported refutation of my analysis is baseless." Asked to simply look at 5 photos in an e-mail showing the cascading molten metal and core columns which appear to have been cut with Thermite, Bazant responded, "I do not have time."
 
Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, an Iranian-born professor at Berkeley, who was a member of the ASCE team studying the WTC collapse, also refused to look at Jones' paper, saying, "I will not be able to find time to review the material that you have sent me."
 
Photo - Molten metal, presumed to be iron, poured from the 81st floor of the South Tower shortly before it collapsed.

Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble?

May 6, 2006


The plumes of bluish smoke that rose for weeks from the rubble of the destroyed World Trade Center contained unprecedented amounts of toxic ultra-fine particles which are created only when metal boils.

DAVIS, California -- In the days after 9-11, when he saw the light bluish smoke rising from the rubble of the World Trade Center, Thomas A. Cahill, an expert on airborne aerosols and director of the DELTA Group at the University of California at Davis, knew the plumes contained large amounts of the very smallest particles, the extremely toxic ultra-fine particles less than 1 one-millionth of a meter in size, and smaller. Unlike the much larger dust particles from the destruction of the twin towers, these ultra-fine and nano-particles are particularly hazardous because of their extremely small size, which allows them to pass throughout the body and penetrate into the nucleus of the human cell.
 
In the end of September 2001, Robert Leifer, a colleague from the Department of Energy's Environmental Measurement Laboratory in New York City contacted Cahill and asked him to send one of the DELTA Group's air monitoring devices known as the 8-stage rotating drum impactor. By October 2, 2001, the Davis air monitoring unit was set up on the lab's roof at 201 Varick Street at the edge of the "exclusion zone," about one mile north of the smoking rubble of the WTC. On top of the 12-story building, the unit was at an elevation of about 150 feet above street level, but lower than most of the surrounding buildings. The exclusion zone was the area around the WTC which had no electricity as a result of the destruction of the power plant that had existed under WTC 7. Cahill's air sampling began on October 2 and continued until late December, when the last fires were finally extinguished.
 
Asked why it took so long to begin a scientific evaluation of the air contamination that accompanied the destruction of the WTC, Cahill said he had assumed that there were scores of agencies and scientists monitoring the air quality in New York City after 9-11. "I assumed it was happening. I could not believe it was not," Cahill said. "It [the Davis drum] was all by itself. The EPA did nothing."
 
When Cahill went to New York City in January 2002, rather than welcome his effort to evaluate the toxicity of the city's air, an official with the regional office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had but two questions for him: Who asked you to do it? Who's paying for it?
 
While Christine Todd Whitman, then administrator of the EPA, told New Yorkers that the air was safe to breathe in the days and weeks after 9-11, Cahill said there were enormous violations of standards that jeopardized the health of anyone exposed to the plumes coming from the rubble. Those most affected by the toxic smoke were the thousands of workers who labored on top of the rubble pile, he said.
 
In January, James Zadroga, a 34 year-old detective with the NYPD died of lung disease and mercury poisoning. Zadroga had spent hundreds of hours at Ground Zero working on recovery and cleanup at the site.
 
The conditions were "brutal" for people working at Ground Zero without respirators and slightly less so for those working or living in adjacent buildings, Cahill, a professor emeritus of physics and atmospheric science, said. "It was like they were working inside the stack of an incinerator," he said. "The debris pile acted like a chemical factory. It cooked together the components of the buildings and their contents, including enormous numbers of computers, and gave off gases of toxic metals, acids and organics for at least 6 weeks," he said.
 
The DELTA Group's work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the category of the smallest ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. The extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most unusual aspects of the data, Cahill said. "Ultra-fine particles require extremely high temperatures," Cahill said, "namely the boiling point of the metal."
 
While Cahill said he was not aware of evidence confirming the existence of molten metal in the rubble of the WTC, his data showing high levels of ultra-fine particles in the smoke plume prove that incredibly intense hot spots, capable of boiling and vaporizing metals and other components from the debris, persisted beneath the rubble for weeks.
 
"As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running," Leslie Robertson, structural engineer responsible for the design of the WTC, said at the National Conference of Structural Engineers on October 5, 2001.
 
I reported in 2002 that pools of "literally molten steel" were seen in the basements of the collapsed twin towers and WTC 7 by contractors hired to remove the rubble. The official reports by NIST, FEMA, and the 9-11 Commission, however, omit any mention of the large quantities of molten metal observed in the basement areas of WTC 7 and the towers.
 
"The official reports do not adequately address the issue of molten metal found at the sites," Professor of Physics Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University says, adding that this fact alone "provides compelling motivation for continued research on the WTC collapses."
 
Jones is the author of a scientific paper entitled "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" which posits an hypothesis, based on the physical and photographic evidence from the WTC, that aluminothermic steel cutting charges, such as Thermite, were used to cut the core columns in order to initiate the collapses of the three steel framed high-rise towers that fell on 9-11. Thermite reactions produce extremely high temperatures and create molten iron and aluminum oxide. Thermite at the WTC would explain the extreme hot spots that persisted in the rubble and the large amounts of molten metal.
 
The official version conspicuously fails to explain what caused these intense hot spots, which are clearly the culprits for both the ultra-fine particles found in the plumes and the pools of molten iron found in the basement. Cahill rules out the gravitational potential energy of the towers' collapse being the cause of the super-intense hot spots saying their potential energy was only capable of raising the entire mass of debris a few degrees. So why was iron boiling in the rubble of the WTC?
 
Using metallographic analysis, the 2005 NIST report from the WTC determined that there was no evidence that any of the steel samples they had examined had reached temperatures above 600 degrees C., well below the temperature of the red-hot pieces of metal that were seen being pulled from the rubble. However, by the time NIST began their study nearly all of the critical steel evidence from the WTC had already been melted down in Chinese steel mills, sold to them by Alan D. Ratner of Metal Management (Newark, NJ) who made $2.5 million by selling the crucial evidence of the greatest crime of mass murder in recent history to Shanghai smelters. 

The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93

May 12, 2006


This crater, about 20 feet wide and 6 feet deep, is said to be the crash site of Flight 93. Do you see any airplane? A much larger debris field several hundred meters from this small crater was kept hidden from the public and the press. Why?

The Hollywood version of what happened to United Flight 93 has "set the record straight," boasts the senior counsel for the 9-11 Commission, although news reports and evidence tell a very different story.
  
The crater, into which Flight 93 supposedly disappeared, appears much larger than it actually is because the men in the background are actually quite a distance behind the crater. The crater, which is part of the deception of what happened to Flight 93, is no larger than 20 feet across and 5 or 6 feet deep, according to eyewitness accounts. How does a Boeing 757 disappear into such a small crater without leaving any trace of itself?
 
The recently released Hollywood film titled United 93 by Universal Pictures is touted by John J. Farmer as being "closer to the truth than every account the government put out before the 9-11 Commission's investigation." Farmer was an attorney general of New Jersey and served as senior counsel for the 9-11 Commission. "The facts of Sept. 11 are as simple as they are grim," Farmer wrote. "The passengers and crew aboard United Airlines Flight 93 really were alone. They were all that stood between the hijackers and the Capitol (or possibly the White House)," he wrote. "That is the core reality of that morning and United 93 gets it right."
 
But the facts about 9-11 are anything but simple and the egregious omissions and distortions of the politically appointed 9-11 Commission, which Farmer worked with, have only further complicated the story, as author David Ray Griffin points out in his analysis of the commission's seriously flawed report. News reports and eyewitness testimony depict a very different fate having befallen United Flight 93 than either of those portrayed in the Hollywood film fabrication or the 9-11 Commission report.
 
On the morning of 9-11, for example, the Associated Press reported that United 93 made an emergency landing at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport. According to the official version, however, Flight 93 crashed into a reclaimed mine near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, shortly after 10 a.m. The AP story clearly reported that United had identified the plane that landed at Cleveland as Flight 93. Cleveland's Mayor Michael R. White reportedly said the plane had landed due to suspicion that it had a bomb aboard.
 
The most obvious problem with the official version that Flight 93 crashed at the site near Shanksville is that the photographs and eyewitness accounts describe a crater too small for such a large plane to have crashed into. The crater at the reclaimed mine was less than 24 feet across and about 6 feet deep. Yet the official version claims that into this crater a Boeing 757 airliner supposedly buried itself, the passengers, the cargo, and thousands of gallons of jet fuel.
 
Nena Lensbouer, who had prepared lunch for the workers at the scrap yard overlooking the crash site, said she was the first person to reach the crater. Lensbouer said that the crater was five to six feet deep and smaller than the 24-foot trailer in her front yard. She described the sound as "an explosion, like an atomic bomb" -- not a crash.
 
Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller, who was one of the first people to arrive at the crash site, said it looked as if someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped trash into it. Miller said there was nothing visible of human remains and that it was as if the plane had "stopped and let the passengers off before it crashed." He said that the most eerie thing about the site was that he hadn't seen a "single drop of blood." Miller said he was stunned at how small the crater was. "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes," Miller said, "because there were no bodies there."
 
I spoke with Bob Leverknight, correspondent with Somerset's Daily American, at the newspaper's office about how Flight 93 disappeared into the crater without leaving a trace. Leverknight, an active member of the Air National Guard, was assigned by the editor to handle my questions. His answers were quite incredible. About the disappearance of the plane, Leverknight said, "It [the ground] liquefied." One of the plane's massive engines, he said, "bounced" off the ground and was found at a very considerable distance -- in the woods.
 
A second plane, identified as Delta 1989, was also reported to have landed at the Cleveland airport due to fears of sabotage. At a news conference, Mayor White identified the plane as a Boeing 767 flying from Boston to Los Angeles. It may be more than coincidence that both of the flights that allegedly struck the World Trade Center also originated at Boston's Logan Airport.
 
The Akron Beacon Journal reported that the mayor had stated that 200 passengers had been released from the plane at 11:15 a.m. The airport in Cleveland had been evacuated at 10 a.m. "Airline passengers and crew members were walking onto the highway to find their rides as no cars were allowed into the passenger drop off and pick up areas," the Journal reported.
 
The following day, Sept. 12, the Journal reported that an eyewitness had watched the Delta plane sitting near the I-X Center, which is a facility at the southeast edge of the airfield. It also reported that 78 passengers "were taken to NASA Glenn Research Center to be interviewed by FBI agents." The NASA facility is at the extreme northwest end of the airfield.
 
I called the former mayor at his 45-acre alpaca ranch, Seven Pines Alpacas in Newcomerstown, Ohio, to inquire about the events at the Cleveland airport on 9-11. White, however, was unwilling to discuss anything and cut the conversation short saying, "I'm out of the interview business."
 
On August 17, 2005, White's business associate and close friend, Nate Gray, was convicted of 36 criminal counts relating to bribery of public officials in four cities. Two days after the Gray conviction, Brent Larkin, in an editorial in the Cleveland Plain Dealer, wrote: "Now we know that, at the very least, White presided over a government that will forever be remembered as one of the most corrupt in the city's history."
 
The central figure in the corruption of the White administration appears to be Samuel H. Miller, co-chairman of the board of directors and treasurer of Forest City Enterprises, Inc., a family-run company with extensive real estate holdings which it owns or manages. The Ratner family, which Miller married into, controls Forest City Enterprises. Ricardo Teamor, one of the co-defendants in the racketeering and extortion scheme with Nate Gray, told the FBI that Mayor White, Gray, and Miller had regular business dinners at the Ritz Carlton hotel for years. According to Teamor, Gray said that Miller controlled White and told the mayor what to do.
 
Miller was White's biggest financial backer when, as a little-known state senator, White ran for mayor in 1989. Miller is also a national leader in Zionist and Jewish causes. He is, for example, the national chairman of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), a past chairman of the Cleveland Jewish Welfare Fund and Israel Bonds, and a member of the board of trustees of the Jewish National Fund. Miller is also the father of Aaron David Miller, who served for two decades at the Department of State as senior adviser to six Secretaries of State, where he was involved in formulating U.S. policy on the Middle East and the Arab-Israel peace process. Miller served as the Deputy Special Middle East Coordinator for Arab-Israeli negotiations and Senior Member of the State Department's Policy Planning Staff.
 
The UJA is the largest Zionist organization dedicated to raising money and support for Israel. Other individuals closely involved in 9-11, such as Larry Silverstein and Lewis Eisenberg have also held leadership positions in the UJA. Eisenberg, the former chairman of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, personally arranged the privatization of the World Trade Center property in 2001 and supervised the negotiations that delivered the 99-year lease to Silverstein only six weeks before the attack. Eisenberg was later appointed finance chairman of the Republican National Committee.
 
I called Miller to ask what he knew about the events of 9-11 at the Cleveland airport. "Not a thing about it," Miller said. Asked about his relationship with Mayor White, Miller responded, "What business is that of yours?"
 
One of the noteworthy news events at the Cleveland airport is that 78 passengers were taken to the NASA Glenn Research Center, which had been evacuated, where they were interviewed by FBI agents. Why were the passengers taken to the NASA facility and why were FBI agents waiting for them there? The NASA administrator at the time was Daniel Saul Goldin, the longest-serving administrator in NASA history, who is also a Zionist with close ties to Israel. Goldin's career began at the same NASA facility at Cleveland's airport.
 
Three weeks before 9-11, the Israeli cabinet discussed Goldin's recent visit to Israel during which he met with senior Israeli officials to discuss "the special relationship and cooperation between Israel and the United States in the field of space research." During his visit, Goldin promised NASA cooperation in fields that will promote Israeli industries and educational projects. Goldin resigned from NASA two months after 9-11.
 
I called the NASA Glenn Research Center to ask about the passengers that were taken to the facility on 9-11. "No one was brought here," said a puzzled NASA spokesperson, who was among those evacuated on 9-11.
 
Mary Ethridge, a journalist with the Akron Beacon Journal, however, stood by the paper's report that the passengers had been interviewed by the FBI in the evacuated NASA facility. The facts indicate that a leading Zionist controlled the corrupt mayor of Cleveland, who in turn controlled the airport where suspicious and secretive events occurred on 9-11 in an evacuated NASA facility. Furthermore, NASA was under the control of a Zionist, as was the FBI, which was under the control of Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff. Chertoff, as AFP discovered, is an Israeli national whose mother, Livia Eisen, was one of the first agents in Israel's military intelligence agency, the Mossad.
 
As with the dubious Apollo moon landings, the Zionist-controlled media and Hollywood play a key role in creating a fantasy version about 9-11 while suppressing the evidence that contradicts the illusion.
 

This crater, into which Flight 93 supposedly disappeared, appears much larger than it actually is because the men in the background are actually quite a distance behind the crater. The crater is no larger than 20 feet across and 5 or 6 feet deep, according to eyewitness accounts. How does a Boeing 757 disappear into such a small crater without leaving any trace of itself?
 

Controlling the Message of 9-11

May 25, 2006

The mainstream media can no longer avoid the red-hot 9-11 issues, such as evidence of pre-planted explosives in the World Trade Center. But rather than presenting all of the facts, the message is being carefully controlled to suppress the evidence of Israeli involvement in the attacks and media complicity in the cover-up.
 
William Rodriguez, the last person to escape from the North Tower just seconds before it collapsed, is a organizer working on behalf of the victims and their families. His efforts to find the truth about the terror attacks were instrumental in pressuring the reluctant Bush administration to establish the 9-11 Commission. Rodriguez, a janitor who helped rescue many people from the burning tower, stayed in the building from the time it was hit until immediately before it was demolished. His observations of what happened in the tower make him an important witness about the events at the World Trade Center. However, when Rodriguez testified before the 9-11 Commission not one word of his testimony was included in its final report.
 
Having known Rodriguez for a year and having spent many hours with him, I have learned a great deal about the events of 9-11 from his personal observations, many of which he does not speak about publicly. On a recent trip to Venezuela, Rodriguez told me that he has been advised not to talk about critical evidence that he has personal knowledge of.
 
"I can't talk about the Israeli involvement because it would offend the Jewish families," Rodriguez said, referring to the relatives of Jewish victims. Yet, Rodriguez has important information about the involvement of Israeli intelligence agents in the attacks. For example, he has personal knowledge that Israeli Mossad agents, posing as employees of a moving company in New Jersey, met regularly with some of the Arab terror suspects at a video store a block from his home in Jersey City during the year prior to the attacks.
 
In the afternoon of 9-11, when five Israeli "movers" were arrested in New Jersey after having been observed videotaping and celebrating the attacks on the twin towers, the police sergeant was told not to mention the fact that the men were Israelis, Rodriguez said. Arab clothing had been found in their vehicle, he said. After investigating the five Israelis, the FBI concluded that they had been "conducting a Mossad surveillance mission and that their employer, Urban Moving Systems of Weehawken, N.J., served as a front," wrote Marc Perelman of the Forward, a leading New York-based Jewish newspaper, in March 2002, citing an un-named "former high-ranking American intelligence official."
 
The five Israeli agents: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yaron Shmuel were arrested eight hours after the attacks by the Bergen County police while driving in an Urban Moving Systems van. The police acted on an FBI alert after the men had been seen celebrating and videotaping the events from the roof of their warehouse and van.
Suspicions were compounded when box cutters, multiple passports, and $4,000 in cash were found in the van, which tested positive for explosives. The Israelis had taken pictures of themselves smiling with the smoldering wreckage of the World Trade Center in the background. In the weeks and months following 9-11, numerous cells of other Mossad "moving" agents were arrested across the nation.
 
In December 2001, Fox News reported that U.S. authorities had detained 60 such "movers" and had arrested or expelled some 120 other Israeli agents, identified as "art students," which were part of an extensive Israeli spy ring attempting to penetrate federal buildings and military facilities. In March 2002, the French newspaper Le Monde reported that the Israeli art students had probably been monitoring "Al Qaeda operatives."
 
Le Monde added that the Israeli spies appear to have been "trailing Al Qaeda members in the United States without informing Washington." More than one-third of the Israelis under investigation lived in Florida, which was the home base for at least 10 of the 19 "hijackers" in the September 11 attacks, Le Monde noted. These facts, the article noted, support "the thesis according to which Israel did not share with the U.S. all the elements it had about the planning of the September 11 attacks."
 
The French and the Fox News reports were dismissed by Israel and its supporters and received limited coverage in the American media, Perelman noted. American Free Press is the only U.S. newspaper which has reported extensively on these stories.
 
The Israelis were held for two-and-a-half months and deported at the end of November 2001, for "visa violations," although the FBI's counterintelligence investigation had concluded that at least two of them were, in fact, Mossad operatives, according to the former American official, who told the Forward that he had been regularly briefed on the investigation by two separate law enforcement officials. "The assessment was that Urban Moving Systems was a front for the Mossad and operatives employed by it," he said. "The conclusion of the FBI was that they were spying on local Arabs but that they could leave because they did not know anything about 9-11."
 
What all of the teams of Israeli "movers" had in common was that their vans had tested positive for explosives when the tests had been conducted by the local police authorities. When the Israelis' vehicles were turned over to the FBI, however, the FBI changed the reports to say that there was no evidence that the vehicles had carried explosives.
 
Rodriguez, who was on the first basement level of the North Tower at 8:45 a.m. on 9-11, has often spoken publicly about feeling and hearing a "huge explosion" coming from the lower basement levels moments before the first plane struck the WTC. He recently told me that he can no longer talk about "explosions," but only about what he heard. The first victim that Rodriguez helped, however, was a man who had been severely burned and injured by what he clearly told Rodriguez were "explosions" in the basement.
 
In return for his co-operation in suppressing evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 and the explosions, Rodriguez has apparently been given vague promises of financial stability and even political office in the event that Hillary Clinton wins the presidency in 2008. "I will be set for life if Hillary wins," he said, which suggests that the powers behind Clinton are directly involved in the cover-up.
 
On the other hand, countless federal employees, who could provide essential testimony about the attacks, have been gagged by secret letters demanding their silence about what they know, did, saw or heard on 9-11.
 
Into the heavily-censored media environment, numerous independent researchers have brought forth a great deal of evidence disproving the official version and showing that Israeli intelligence agents and their U.S.-based supporters are prime suspects in the crimes of 9-11. In order to draw attention away from this growing truth movement, the controlled media has begun promoting a select group of authors and their books, videos, and websites. What this select group has in common is that their works minimize or completely ignore the evidence of Israeli involvement and point to a variety of other suspects being behind 9-11, such as senior officials in the Bush administration, the Neo-Cons, the Vatican, unnamed Luciferians, or the ever popular "Germanic Death Cult."
 
Webster G. Tarpley, author of 9-11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, is one of the authors being promoted by the controlled media. As his title suggests, Tarpley's thesis revolves around the Bush administration being behind 9-11 and completely ignores the evidence of Israeli involvement. Likewise, without presenting a single piece of evidence, Tarpley wrote an article claiming that the recent anti-Muslim cartoon scandal instigated by a Danish newspaper had been a "NATO intelligence provocation." The "entire affair has been cynically orchestrated by NATO intelligence agencies to set the stage for a new world war," Tarpley wrote.
 
Rather than embrace the facts and evidence, Hollywood has produced several propaganda television shows and one movie, United 93, to support the seriously flawed official version. Meanwhile, a product of the so-called alternative media, a video about 9-11 called Loose Change, is now being promoted by the mainstream media. As with the others in the media's select group, the producers of Loose Change keep Israeli involvement out of the picture and place the blame for 9-11 squarely on senior officials in the Bush administration.
 
"We don't want to point fingers at Israel for a number of different reasons," the producers of Loose Change said in a recent interview on Air America. Questioned later by Eric Hufschmid, author of Painful Questions, about their views on who was responsible for 9-11, the producers said that the Israeli role was simply one of trying to warn the U.S. about a potential terror attack. While they are well aware of the evidence of Israeli involvement, the producers of Loose Change say it is more important to prosecute members of the Bush administration and worry about other issues later.
 
A third edition of Loose Change is being prepared for release in movie theaters nationwide this fall, according to the video's producers. Deborah S. Simon received special thanks in the video's credits for providing footage and other help in producing the film. Simon told me that she even handed out copies of the video in front of the White House. Who is Deborah Simon, and why is she helping produce and promote Loose Change?
 
Deborah Simon (nee Cox) is married into the billionaire Simon family of Indianapolis. The family owns the Simon Property Group, Inc., which boasts as being the largest U.S. real estate company. The Simon family owns, develops, and manages more than 280 shopping malls in the United States and 50 similar properties in Europe and Japan. The Simon family, strong supporters of Zionist causes, the Clintons, and the Democratic Party, also own the Indiana Pacers basketball team. The campus of the Jewish Federation of Greater Indianapolis is named after Max and Mae Simon, the parents of Melvin, Fred, and Herb.
 
Melvin Simon, the Brooklyn-born founder of the company, also owned a Hollywood production company and produced more than 20 films. Simon is remembered for such films as Porky's, Love at First Bite, and Zorro, the Gay Blade. As of January 2005, Porky's was the highest-grossing movie from Canada. More notably, Simon has had business partnerships with both Larry Silverstein and the Australian-Israeli billionaire Frank Lowy, the leaseholders of the destroyed World Trade Center. In the late 1980s, Silverstein and Simon developed a mall in Manhattan together, and after 9-11, Simon teamed up with Lowy's Westfield America in an attempt to take over the prestigious retail properties belonging to Taubman Centers, Inc. of Detroit.
 
Silverstein and Simon both sit on the advisory board of the Steven L. Newman Real Estate Institute of Baruch College in downtown Manhattan. In addition to supporting the Clintons, the Simon family has provided generous financial support to a number of Indiana senators, governors, and congressmen. Lee H. Hamilton, for example, the retired congressman who came out of retirement to serve as vice chairman of the 9-11 Commission, received a great deal of money from the Simons during his political career. During his 34-year career in Congress, Hamilton served as chairman of several key committees, such as the Committee on International Relations, the Joint Economic Committee, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran. Although he has retired from Congress, Hamilton remains a member of the Department of Homeland Security Advisory Council and the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. As director of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, Hamilton still receives generous financial support from the Simon family.
 
Birch Bayh, the former senator from Indiana, has been on the board of directors of the Simon Property Group since 1993 when his son, Evan, was governor of the state. The younger Bayh is now a U.S. Senator. Diane Meyer Simon was director and administrator of the elder Bayh's senate office with whom she worked from 1968 to 1981. When Bayh was defeated in 1980, Diane Meyer married the billionaire Herbert Simon in 1981.

How the Zionist Media Network Interprets 9-11

May 25, 2006

Why is the mainstream media suppressing essential 9-11 evidence?
The question of who controls the media is central to understanding the criminal network behind the cover-up, and by extension – the attack itself.
 
The events of 9-11 have become the most blatantly propagandized events of modern American history. Rather than examining the evidence from the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the mainstream media has provided unwavering support for the seriously flawed official version that nineteen Arabs armed with box-cutters are responsible for the devastation in New York City and Washington. Since 9-11, there have been numerous television programs and books produced supporting the official 9-11 story. 2006 marks the release of the first major motion pictures designed to bolster that version. As if coordinated by a hidden hand, three major productions are being released this year, each focusing on a different location. 
 
A recent Zogby poll reveals that less than half of the American public believes the official 9-11 saga. The nationwide poll conducted in mid-May found that 52 percent of the population thinks that the government and its appointed 9-11 Commission ignored evidence that contradicted the official story. The 9-11 Commission, for example, did not mention – much less investigate – the unexplained collapse of Larry Silverstein's 47-story WTC 7. This blatant omission helps explain why nearly half the U.S. population is unaware of the demolition-like collapse that occurred in the late afternoon of 9-11. The collapse of WTC 7, a key event which has baffled structural engineers, is rarely even mentioned by the mainstream media. 
 
The numerous eyewitness accounts of explosions in the WTC before and during the collapses are another crucial aspect of 9-11 that is censored by the mass media. The flow of molten metal spilling from the South Tower before it collapsed and the pressure pulses and puffs of white smoke that preceded each flow are described in great detail in the final report published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in September 2005. But the videos and evidence of this molten metal pouring from the 81st floor have not been shown or discussed by the mainstream media. 
 
The data in the NIST report about the molten metal provides scientific evidence that a form of steel-melting Thermite was used in the destruction of the WTC. The Thermite reaction, which cuts steel like a warm knife through butter, produces molten iron and aluminum oxide, a white smoke, and extreme temperatures of 5400 degrees F. Thermite would explain the persistent hot spots that burned beneath the rubble for weeks after the attack. The hottest spot in the rubble was the eastern corner of the South Tower where the largest flow of molten metal was seen immediately before the collapse. Similar hot spots persisted beneath the rubble of the North Tower and WTC 7.
 
The censorship by the mass media of such critical evidence indicates that the controlled media is engaged in a deliberate cover-up of the worst terror attack in U.S. history. The Zogby poll reveals that the majority of Americans simply do not believe the government version being trumpeted by the mainstream media. Asked if the media had adequately covered the unanswered questions of 9-11, 55 percent said "no".
 
So why is the mainstream media suppressing essential evidence about 9-11? Who controls the media, and who is responsible for creating the propaganda supporting the official version? 
 
United 93 – The Movie
 
The first movie about 9-11, United 93, has already been released. It was produced by Working Title Films of Oxford Street, London, a British-based subsidiary of Universal Pictures. The film, directed by Paul Greengrass, was produced by Liza Chazin, Lloyd Levin, Eric Fellner, Debra Hayward and Tim Bevan. "As 2006 marks the passing of five years since the epochal events of 9-11, the time has come for contemporary cinema's leading filmmakers to dramatically investigate the events of that day, its causes and its consequences," the film's website says. United 93 "partially improvises the events," it says, because, in something of an understatement, "there is no perfect record of the hijacking's exact details."
 
Yet Greengrass, the writer and director of the film says his improvisation "tells the story of the day through a meticulous re-enactment of events surrounding United 93, the last of the four hijacked aircraft, in the belief that by examining this single event something much larger can be found – the shape of our world today."
 
"It was the most important event that occurred in our lifetime," Greengrass told Michael Elkin, entertainment editor of the Philadelphia-based Jewish Exponent. "It drives all our politics; it defines the nature of our world and our children's world."
 
In the 1980s, Greengrass worked for Cecil and Sidney Bernstein's left-leaning Granada Television and co-wrote the exposé SpyCatcher: The Candid Autobiography of a Senior Intelligence Officer with Peter Wright, the former assistant director of MI5, the British counter-intelligence and security agency.
 
"The ultimate question" raised by the film, Greengrass told the Jewish Exponent, is "How do we face up to the jihadist hijacking of Islam?" 
Elkin told me that Greengrass came to Philadelphia for the Jewish Exponent interview shortly before the film's release in late April. I asked Jonathan Tobin, editor of Jewish Exponent if Greengrass was Jewish. "I don't know," Tobin said, "but it's certainly a Jewish name."
 
World Trade Center Movie
 
The second film to be released, coming out in August, will be the World Trade Center movie produced by Paramount Pictures of Hollywood and directed by Oliver Stone. Paramount Pictures is a subsidiary of Viacom, which is controlled by Sumner Murray Redstone. The film's producers, Michael Shamberg and Stacey Sher, asked Andrea Berloff to write the screenplay. Berloff, a 32-year old writer, "believes in the Jewish tradition and culture," her sister Stacey said from the family home in Brookline, Mass.
 
Pentagon 9-11 Documentary
 
A television documentary, Pentagon 9-11, is being produced by Admiralty Productions, Ltd. of Fairfax Station, Virginia. The Pentagon movie will be Admiralty's first work. Joel M. Ratner, president and founder of InterMedia Development Corp. is responsible for producing and directing the film. The co-producers at Admiralty Productions are Rear Admiral William Thompson (U.S. Navy - ret.), Edward A. Shackleford, a Virginia-based lawyer, and Michael A. Dickerson, a professor of communication specializing in military matters at George Mason University. On his company's website, Ratner says his film will be "the definitive account of the 9-11 attack on the Pentagon as a television documentary and DVD product." 
 
Dickerson told me that Ratner is in charge of the film. Dickerson said he had not seen the Pentagon building performance report or any of the other evidence which disproves the film's storyline that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Among other things, he was unaware of the presence of intact structural columns and undisturbed cable spools in the path of the alleged Boeing 757, which supposedly struck the Pentagon "at grade level."
 
Apart from supporting the official saga with emotional stories of suffering and heroism, these productions share one thing in common. Although it is difficult to obtain biographical information about the people behind these films, because of secrecy, name changes, and aliases, it is clear that the key players are British and American Jews, many with strong ties to Israel, a country from which more than 200 suspects were arrested in connection with 9-11. 
 
For example, the person who controls Viacom, which owns Paramount Pictures, the studio producing the WTC film, is Sumner Redstone. Redstone is chairman of both Viacom and CBS Corp. "Viacom is me," Redstone said. "I'm Viacom." Redstone's media empire includes Comedy Central, Showtime, CBS, MTV, Nickelodeon, and BET. Sumner is the son of Max Rothstein, who became Michael Redstone. The elder Rothstein got started in show business when he bought the original Latin Quarter, a nightclub started by Lou Walters, father of television personality Barbara Walters. Lou Walters was a business partner with Elias M. Loew, the founder of the Loew empire of theaters and hotels.
 
Rothstein opened one of the first drive-in theatres in the United States, and built a chain of theatres in the 1940s. Rothstein was also a founder of Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
 
There is abundant evidence that the Israeli military intelligence agency Mossad had prior knowledge of the WTC attacks on the day of the attacks but did not warn the government of New York City, which could have saved thousands of lives. Ignoring the evidence of Israeli involvement, a network of committed Zionists with undue influence over the media and government is manipulating the historic events of 9-11 to suit their agenda.

The Suppressed Photos of Thermite Explosions

May 26, 2006

The Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in September 2005 provides a great deal of data and evidence to support the thesis that Thermite was used in the destruction of the twin towers on 9-11. The report includes many appendices which contain photographs and data confirming that many explosions occurred prior to the collapse and that molten iron was produced as a result. These "pressure pulses" produced molten iron and puffs of white smoke, precisely what is produced in a Thermite reaction.
 
Although some reports claim that the molten metal is aluminum and the NIST report "assumes" it to be aluminum, molten aluminum in daylight conditions appears silvery and does not emit bright yellow and orange light due to the peculiar characteristic of aluminum of having low emissivity.
 
A high-resolution photograph (Fig. 9-71) of the northeast face of WTC2 was taken 4 seconds after one of the many "pressure pulses" that occurred in the tower before it collapsed. NIST provides no explanation for what caused these pressure pulses which ejected white smoke and debris from the tower in the seconds before it collapsed. The white cloud seen in Fig. 9-71 has all of the characteristics of the aluminum oxide particles, or whitish smoke, which would be produced during a Thermite reaction. A second or two after this photo was taken, massive amounts of molten metal poured from the window where the extremely bright flames are seen.
 
At 9:53:41 and 9:53:46 two more pressure pulses occurred, which were accompanied by flows of molten metal from the same window. The largest flow occurred during the second release, which is seen in the photo taken at 9:53:51 (Fig. 9-75) when the bright flow of molten metal from the top of window 80-255 was "prominent," according to the NIST final report.
 
The "pressure pulses" described by NIST appear to have been explosive reactions that produced white smoke and molten iron, precisely what a Super-Thermite reaction would produce. Super-Thermite is finely powdered aluminum and iron oxide which reacts like an explosive due to the extremely small size of the particles.
 
At 9:57:21, there was another pulse followed by a more intense pulse at 9:57:32. These pressure pulses greatly increased the flow rate of the molten metal, which would now be nearly continuous until the tower collapsed, according to the NIST report. The pressure pulses in the tower ejected debris which was seen being blown from the 80-81st floors of WTC2 from 9:58:49 until the tower collapsed 10 seconds later.
 
Photo: The bright reaction and white smoke in this photo of the South Tower followed one of the many pressure pulses described in the NIST final report. These reactions occurred in the minutes before the tower collapsed. The evidence indicates that an aluminothermic reaction like Super-Thermite produced the molten metal, white smoke, pressure pulses, and extreme hot spots seen prior to the WTC collapse and found afterwards in the rubble. 

Open Letter to NIST Investigators

May 26, 2006

9-11 WTC Team at NIST
National Institute of Standards and Technology
U.S. Dept. of Commerce
 
With great interest I read the comments in the Final Report about the unexplained molten metal, pressure pulses, and puffs of smoke observed in the South Tower (WTC 2) shortly before it collapsed. The discussion of the molten metal and pressure pulses in the NIST report (Appendix NCSTAR 1-5A, Chapter 9, "Fire Behavior in WTC 2) raises more questions than it answers.
 
MOLTEN METAL IS NOT ALUMINUM
 
The composition of the unknown molten metal is discussed:
 
"The composition of the flowing material can only be the subject of speculation, but its behavior suggests it could have been molten aluminum." (p. 375)
 
Having seen molten aluminum at the temperature suggested by the NIST report, i.e. about 650 degrees Celsius, I learned that molten aluminum appears silvery-gray in daylight. In fact it appears to have the same color as aluminum foil due to its low emissivity in daylight conditions. The flowing molten metal coming from the eastern corner of the 81st floor of WTC 2, however, appears distinctly yellow or bright orange in the daylight and when it breaks up, it appears white. Therefore, the photographic evidence proves that this molten metal cannot be aluminum.
 
What is it about the behavior of this molten metal that "suggests it could have been aluminum," as the NIST authors wrote? The "molten metal" seen spilling from the WTC 2 is mentioned 27 times in this appendix alone and it is usually accompanied by a phrase "assumed to be aluminum." Elsewhere it is described as "possibly aluminum," and sometimes, simply as "molten aluminum." (e.g. pp. 412-413) How can the WTC scientists at NIST assume for one minute that this molten metal is aluminum?
 
Is it not, in fact, much more likely that this is molten iron? The color of the molten metal falling from the 81st floor of the WTC 2 suggests that the metal is NOT aluminum but is more likely to be iron. Molten aluminum appears silvery-gray in daylight conditions, as professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University wrote in his paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"
 
The approximate temperature of a hot metal is given by its color, quite independent of the composition of the metal. (A notable exception is aluminum, which due to low emissivity and high reflectivity appears silvery-gray in daylight conditions, at all temperatures whether in solid or liquid forms. Aluminum does incandesce like other metals, but faintly, so that in broad daylight conditions in air, it appears silvery-gray according to experiments done at BYU. [Jones, 2006])
 
In his paper "Experiments with Molten Aluminum," Jones wrote that the use of Thermite, or a derivative such as Thermate, is consistent with the observation of yellow-white hot molten metal observed falling from the northeast corner of WTC 2 (the South Tower) prior to its collapse.
 
We note that aluminum has many free electrons, so it reflects ambient light very well and it appears silvery. Aluminum at about 1000 C will emit yellow light (incandescence) the same as iron, but in daylight the molten aluminum would appear silvery due to high reflectivity combined with low emissivity, while molten iron would appear yellow (as seen in the video record.) Moreover, aluminum from a plane would melt at approximately 550-650 C, and would flow away from the heat source, and thus would be very unlikely to reach 1000 C at all. Thus, the observed molten metal flowing from WTC 2 on 9-11 cannot be aluminum but could be molten iron from the Thermite reaction.
 
THE UNEXPLAINED "PRESSURE PULSES"
 
Furthermore, the pressure pulses and puffs of smoke, which the report says accompanied the flows of molten metal, strongly suggest that some sort of explosive reaction was causing the pressure pulses and the molten metal. Pressure pulses are mentioned 48 times in this appendix (NCSTAR 1-5A) alone. (The words "explosion" or "explosive" are not mentioned once although scores of eyewitnesses reported hearing and seeing explosions before the tower fell.)
 
NIST says that the cause of these pressure pulses is "unknown": "The sources for the pressure pulses that created the wide-spread smoke and/or dust puffs observed on multiple faces of WTC 2 are unknown." It also says that these "pressure pulses" and releases of puffs of smoke "were correlated with releases of molten aluminum." (p. 412)
 
"The puff of smoke and/or dust just prior to the first appearance of the molten material suggests that the ultimate event responsible for the release of the material occurred suddenly, in the process creating a pressure pulse that forced smoke and/or dust out of open windows over three floors." (p. 375)
 
"the flows of molten metal were temporally correlated with pressure pulses" (p. 396)
 
"At 9:57:32 there was a fairly intense pressure pulse within the tower. The flow rate of molten metal increased dramatically at this time." (p. 383)
 
The "pressure pulses" that preceded the massive flow of molten metal seen in this photo (Fig. 9-75) are described by NIST on page 380:
 
"At 9:53:41 and 9:53:46 a.m. two pressure pulses forced additional smoke from windows on the north face. Both of these occurrences were accompanied by short flows of molten material from the same window, 80-255, on the 80th floor observed earlier. The largest flow occurred during the second release. Figure 9-75 shows a view of the northeast corner of WTC 2 taken from a video at 9:53:51 a.m. The bright molten stream flowing from the top of window 80-255 is prominent."
 
As we can see from the photographs, these puffs of smoke were whitish, suggesting that they were caused by an explosive reaction like Thermite. In Fig. 9-71, the reaction that is producing the molten metal is seen to be producing a large amount of white smoke. This is evidence of a Thermite reaction is progress.
 
Taking these observations together, the evidence indicates that something like Super-Thermite (fine particles of aluminum and iron oxide) appears to have been used on the 81st floor of the WTC and could be responsible for the extreme heat, the pressure pulses, the molten iron flows, and the white puffs of smoke. The Thermite was evidently used to cut the core columns and initiate the collapse of the tower.
 
Is this not the best explanation for the evidence we see from the 81st floor and the massive flow of molten metal? This same corner of the building was the location of the hottest "hot spot" that persisted for weeks beneath the rubble.
 
WHO OCCUPIED FLOORS 81 AND 82?
 
Because the molten metal apparently formed on the 81st floor of the WTC 2, there is a need to understand exactly what was on that floor on 9-11.
 
Table 5-3 provides information about the conditions of the floors 79, 81, and 82 in the South Tower (WTC 2). This information is on page 79 of the NIST Final Report. Fuji Bank was the tenant of these floors but in the column of the General Description of Tenant Layout there are empty spaces for these three floors. Is that because they were empty? Were they not being used by Fuji Bank employees at the time? Is that why there is no description what was on these floors?

The Israeli Code on U.S. Government Computers

June 16, 2006

The most critical computer and communication networks used by the U.S. government and military are secured by encryption software written by an Israeli "code breaker" tied to an Israeli state-run scientific institution.
 
The National Security Agency (NSA), the U.S. intelligence agency with the mandate to protect government and military computer networks and provide secure communications for all branches of the U.S. government uses security software written by an Israeli code breaker whose home office is located at the Weizmann Institute in Israel.
 
A Bedford, Massachusetts-based company called RSA Security, Inc. issued a press release on March 28, 2006, which revealed that the NSA would be using its security software. "U.S. Department of Defense Agency Selects RSA Security Encryption Software" was the headline of the company's press release which announced that the National Security Agency had selected its encryption software to be used in the agency's "classified communications project." RSA stands for the names of the founders of the company: Ronald L. Rivest, Adi Shamir, and Leonard M. Adleman. Adi Shamir, the lead theoretician, is an Israeli citizen and a professor at the Weizmann Institute, a scientific institution tied to the Israeli defense establishment.
 
"My main area of research is cryptography, making and breaking codes," Shamir's webpage at the Weizmann Institute says. "It is motivated by the explosive growth of computer networks and wireless communication. Without cryptographic protection, confidential information can be exposed to eavesdroppers, modified by hackers, or forged by criminals."
 
The NSA/Central Security Service defines itself as America's cryptologic organization, which "coordinates, directs, and performs highly specialized activities to protect U.S. government information systems and produce foreign signals intelligence information." The fact that the federal intelligence agency responsible for protecting the most critical computer systems and communications networks used by all branches of the U.S. government and military is using Israeli-made encryption software should come as no surprise. The RSA press release is just the icing on the cake; the keys to the most critical computer networks in the United States have long been held in Israeli hands.
 
I inquired with the NSA about its use of Israeli-made security software for classified communications projects and asked why such outsourcing was not seen as a national security threat. Why is "America's cryptologic organization" using Israeli encryption codes? NSA spokesman Ken White said that the agency is "researching" the matter and would respond in the coming week.
 
Previously, I have reported that scores of "security software" companies spawned and funded by the Mossad, the Israeli military intelligence agency, have proliferated in the United States. The "security" software products of many of these usually short-lived Israeli-run companies have been integrated into the computer products which are provided to the U.S. government by leading suppliers such as Unisys.
 
Unisys integrated Israeli security software, provided by the Israel-based Check Point Software Technologies and Eurekify, into its own software, so that Israeli software, written by Mossad-linked companies, now "secures" the most sensitive computers in the U.S. government and commercial sector.
 
The Mossad-spawned computer security firms typically have an office in the U.S. while their research and development is done in Israel. The Mossad start-up firms usually have short lives before they are acquired for exaggerated sums of money by a larger company, enriching their Israeli owners in the process and integrating the Israeli directors and their Mossad-produced software into the parent company.
 
RSA, for example, an older security software company, acquired an Israeli-run security software company, named Cyota, at the end of 2005 for $145 million. In January 2005, Cyota, "the leading provider of online security and anti-fraud solutions for financial institutions" had announced that "security expert" Amit Yoran, had joined the company's board of directors. Prior to becoming a director at Cyota, Yoran, a 34-year old Israeli, had already been the national "Cyber Czar," having served as director of the Department of Homeland Security's National Cyber Security Division. Yoran had been appointed "Cyber Czar" at age 32 by President George W. Bush in September 2003.
 
Before joining DHS, Yoran had been vice president for worldwide managed security services at Symantec. Prior to that, he had been the founder, president and CEO of Riptech, Inc., an information security management and monitoring firm, which Symantec acquired in 2002 for $145 million.
 
Yoran and his brother Naftali Elad Yoran are graduates of the U.S. Military Academy at Westpoint. Elad graduated in 1991 and Amit in 1993. Along with their brother Dov, the Yoran brothers are key players in the security software market. Amit has also held critical positions in the U.S. government overseeing computer security for the very systems that apparently failed on 9-11.
 
Before founding Riptech in 1998, Amit Yoran directed the vulnerability-assessment program within the computer emergency response team at the US Department of Defense. Yoran previously served as an officer in the United States Air Force as the Director of Vulnerability Programs for the Department of Defense's Computer Emergency Response Team and in support of the Assistant Secretary of Defense's Office.
 
In June 2005, Yoran joined the board of directors of Guardium, Inc., another Mossad-spawned "provider of database security solutions" based in Waltham, Massachusetts. Guardium is linked with Ptech, an apparent Mossad "cut out" computer security company linked with the 9-11 attacks.
 
Ptech, a computer software company in Quincy, Mass., was supposedly a small start-up company founded by a Lebanese Muslim and funded by a Saudi millionaire. Yet Ptech's clients included all the key federal governmental agencies, including the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Naval Air Command, Congress, the Department of Energy, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Internal Revenue Service, NATO, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service and even the White House.
 
The marketing manager at Ptech, Inc. when the company started in the mid-1990s, however, was not a Muslim or an Arab, but an American Jewish lawyer named Michael S. Goff who had suddenly quit his law firm for no apparent reason and joined the Arab-run start-up company. Goff was the company's information systems manager and had single-handedly managed the company's marketing and "all procurement" of software, systems and peripherals. He also trained the employees. Goff was obviously the key person at Ptech.
 
In the wake of 9-11, during the Citizens' Commission hearings in New York, Indira Singh, a consultant who had worked on a Defense Advanced Research Project, pointed to Ptech and MITRE Corp. being involved in computer "interoperability issues" between the FAA and NORAD. At this time Ptech's ties to Arabs was the focus, and Goff was out of the picture.
"Ptech was with MITRE Corporation in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9-11," Singh said. "Their specific job is to look at interoperability issues the FAA had with NORAD and the Air Force in the case of an emergency. If anyone was in a position to know that the FAA -- that there was a window of opportunity or to insert software or to change anything, it would have been Ptech along with MITRE."
 
The Mossad-run Guardium company is linked with Ptech through Goff Communications, the Holliston, Mass.-based public relations firm previously run by Michael S. Goff and his wife Marcia, which represents Guardium. Since being exposed in 2005, however, Michael's name no longer appears on the company website.
 
Photo: Amit Yoran, the Israeli "Cyber Security Czar" appointed by President George W. Bush in 2003. Yoran has held various positions since the 1990s in which he oversaw computer security for the Dept. of Defense computers.

Ehud Olmert's Ties to 9-11

June 18, 2006

The first two months of Ehud Olmert's term as Israel's prime minister have been described as "the bloodiest, deadliest and the most criminal period of the 58-year-old state of Israel." Although the controlled press overlooks the new Israeli leader's crimes, Olmert's ties to the convicted Israeli criminal who controlled airport security at Boston airport on 9-11 cannot be ignored.
 
Although Zionism is probably the most potent force influencing U.S. politics, it is safe to say that it remains a political philosophy woefully misunderstood by the majority of the U.S. population. Although President George W. Bush and his war cabinet are advancing the Zionist agenda, an agenda which is promoted and supported by nearly every member of Congress, Zionism and its bloody history are subjects which most Americans know virtually nothing about. While American universities offer courses and degrees in practically every subject imaginable, a college curriculum offering a critical examination of Zionism and its history is not to be found.
 
This public's general ignorance of Zionism, its goals and history, is compounded by the controlled media, which grossly distorts and misinterprets Zionism to make this most un-American philosophy appear to be something familiar and benevolent. The well-documented history of Zionist terror and ethnic cleansing, something which is well known to all Israelis and Palestinians, is strange and unknown to most Americans, primarily due to academic and media censorship.
 
After the terror attacks of 9-11, which the evidence indicates involved Israeli intelligence agents, and with more than 150,000 Americans engaged in costly and disastrous wars in the Middle East, it is simply no longer sustainable for Americans to remain blissfully ignorant of political Zionism.
 
ZIONISM AND COMMUNISM
 
Zionism, as a political movement, developed with Communism in the late 1800s among the Jewish communities in the western regions of the Russian Empire. In areas with large Jewish populations in Lithuania, Poland, Byelorussia, and Ukraine, Zionism became a new national religion. From the beginning, the Communist and Zionist movements were closely intertwined.
 
In the late 1800s, the religious-political ideology of Zionism led Jews in search of a national identity to begin speaking and writing Hebrew, a language which had not been spoken for thousands of years. Jews were considered a national group in the Soviet Union and Jewish nationality was marked as such in Soviet passports. A Jewish Autonomous Region was even established in the Soviet Union in the area of Birobidjan in 1934 with Yiddish as the official language.
 
Although the Russian and Eastern European Jews known as the Ashkenazi are not even Semites, but Slavic and Asiatic converts to Judaism, Zionist zeal led them to identify themselves as "Hebrew," when for example, they entered the United States at Ellis Island.
 
As Zionists had "reconstituted" the "Hebrew" language, the primary political objective of political Zionism has always been the formation of a purely Jewish state in Palestine, something which never existed in history. The fact that 20th Century Palestine was already inhabited by Palestinians, many of whom are real Semites, descended from the original Jews, Arabs, Greeks, and other races of the Holy Land, was something the Zionists intended to use military force to correct.
 
The armed conquest and ethnic cleansing of Palestine was vigorously promoted in the 1930s by Ze'ev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky, one of the most militant of Zionists. Jabotinsky, born in Odessa in 1880, became commander of the Zionist militia known as the Irgun in 1937. Jabotinsky headed the New Zionist Organization (N.Z.O), the Betar youth movement, and the Irgun militia, three extensions of the same extremist movement.
 
The Jabotinsky ideology maintains that the Jewish people have exclusive rights to all the Land of Israel, which it claims extends from the Nile of Egypt to the Euphrates River in Iraq.
 
OLMERT AND JABOTINSKY
 
Ehud Olmert, like his Russian-born parents who emigrated first to China and then to Palestine, is an ideological child of Jabotinsky. Olmert's father, Mordechai, was a devoted follower who joined the right-wing Herut movement and the Irgun militia then led by the notorious Zionist terrorist Menachem Begin. Olmert's intensely right-wing family lived on a cooperative farm called Nahalat Jabotinsky. As a child, Olmert was a member of Betar, the militaristic youth movement. Begin, the hard-line Israeli prime minister who held the credo "In blood and fire Judea fell; in blood and fire Judea shall rise," would later refer to Olmert as "Ehud, my son."
 
Olmert, a member of parliament since 1973, later became mayor of Jerusalem, the occupied capital city of Palestine, and oversaw Israel's territorial expansion of the city limits. The area that Israelis now call Jerusalem extends from Bethlehem in the south, to Ramallah in the north, and Jericho is the east. In the thinking of Zionists like Olmert, there is simply no place for the Palestinians in the Land of Israel: "There is no choice: the Arabs must make room for the Jews of Eretz Israel," Jabotinsky wrote. "If it was possible to transfer the Baltic peoples, it is also possible to move the Palestinian Arabs."
 
The barrier wall that has been built across the West Bank is an idea straight from the writings of Jabotinsky: "Zionist colonization, even the most restricted, must either be terminated or carried out in defiance of the will of the native population. This colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only under the protection of a force independent of the local population -- an iron wall which the native population cannot break through," Jabotinsky wrote in his 1923 book, The Iron Wall: We and the Arabs.
 
"Talking peace and drumming up support for his realignment plan of settlement, Ehud Olmert's eight weeks in power proved to be the bloodiest, deadliest and the most criminal period of the 58-year-old state of Israel," Duraid Al Baik, foreign editor of Gulf News wrote in a recent article, "Olmert: The criminal who peddles peace."
 
"Since he was sworn in as the 12th prime minister of Israel on April 14, the Israelis have killed more than 50 Palestinians and injured around 200 almost at a rate of 1 killed and 4 injured per day," Al Baik wrote. "The new prime minister has set a record, surpassing the one established by his predecessor Ariel Sharon during the bloodiest days of the Palestinian uprising or intifada."
 
Seeking to foment a civil conflict among Palestinians, Olmert is now providing weapons to support the "private army" of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who is seen by many as a Palestinian quisling working against the elected Hamas-led government.
 
The most egregious terrorist act, among the many recently committed by Israeli forces, was the shelling of the beach in Gaza in which eight members of one family were killed. This blatant act of Israeli terror was followed by the official denial of responsibility although the Israelis had been shelling the Gaza Strip at the time the family on the beach was hit.
 
Mark Garlasco, a military expert working for the US-based Human Rights Watch group, was the first independent investigator to reach the scene of the crime and found shrapnel from a 155 mm artillery shell. "My assessment [is] that it's likely that this was incoming artillery fire that landed on the beach and was fired by the Israelis from the north of Gaza," Garlasco said.
 
OLMERT AND ATZMON
 
Olmert, who has long been tarnished by allegations of financial crimes, was implicated in a financial scandal involving forged receipts for donations to the 1988 Likud campaign, of which he was co-treasurer. This affair culminated in the March 1996 conviction of three other Likudniks, including Menahem Atzmon, the Likud treasurer. Olmert was also later indicted in the Likud affair, but was acquitted. During the 1970s Olmert had worked in the law firm owned by another Atzmon, Uzi Atzmon.
 
Menahem Atzmon, convicted in Israel, went on to become the founder and head of International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS), the parent company of Huntleigh USA, the airport security firm that ran passenger screening operations at the airports of Boston and Newark on 9-11. Huntleigh USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Israeli company called International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) International N.V., a Netherlands-based aviation and transportation security firm headed by "former [Israeli] military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies."
 
Menachem Atzmon, convicted in Israel in 1996 for campaign finance fraud, and his business partner Ezra Harel, took over management of security at the Boston and Newark airports when their company ICTS bought Huntleigh USA in 1999. UAL Flight 175 and AA 11, which allegedly struck the twin towers, both originated in Boston, while UAL 93, which purportedly crashed in Pennsylvania, departed from the Newark airport. The convicted Israeli criminal Atzmon also controls and operates the German port of Rostock on the Baltic Sea.
 
Some 9-11 victims' families brought lawsuits against Huntleigh claiming the security firm had been grossly negligent on 9-11. While these relatives have a right to discovery and to know what Huntleigh did or did not do to protect their loved ones on 9-11, Huntleigh, along with the other security companies, was granted complete congressional protection in 2002 and will not be called to account for its actions on 9-11 in any U.S. court.
 
Atzmon, a convicted criminal, political ally and co-defendant of Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert, was directly responsible for passenger and airline security at Boston's Logan Airport, whence the two airliners which struck the World Trade Center originated. Olmert's relationship with Atzmon and the failed airport security of 9-11 is obviously more than coincidental yet the controlled press in the United States has failed to investigate this Israeli link to the terror attacks as it has with so many other links.
 
 
Photo: Of the same mind, Ehud Olmert and Ariel Sharon are brothers in arms and followers of Ze'ev Jabotinsky, founder of the most radical, racist, and militant form of Zionism.

The Forewarning of 9-11 & the Israeli Fugitive

August 24, 2006

The case of the Israeli criminal Kobi Alexander is like the proverbial "tip of the iceberg." While Alexander's crimes, through which he became immensely wealthy, are now evident, they are but a small piece of a much larger Zionist criminal network – connected to the 9-11 terror attacks – which remains hidden beneath the surface.
 
Alexander, former head of the Israel-based Comverse Technology, was, until his crimes were discovered, one of the highest paid executives in the United States. In the year 2000, for example, he reportedly earned some $102.5 million, with $93 million coming from the "exercise of options." We now know that most of Alexander's money was made through the fraudulent "exercise of options."
 
Comverse Technology, the U.S.-based "parent company" of an older and much bigger Israel-based company with the same name, is the owner of the Verint, Ulticom, Starhome, Mercom and Startel companies. The key positions in these companies are all held by Israeli nationals.
 
Alexander, was recently allowed to flee the United States after he and two other former Comverse executives were charged with securities, mail and wire fraud by U.S. prosecutors in Brooklyn, New York. A warrant has been issued for his arrest. While a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's office for the Eastern District of New York told me on August 15 that he "expected" that Alexander would turn himself in, the New York Times was rather less optimistic. "It will be a long time – if ever – before Alexander explains himself in a courtroom," the Times wrote on August 21. Alexander's lawyer, Robert Morvillo, said he "believed" that Alexander and his family were on vacation in Israel. Alexander, an Israeli citizen and a former military officer, wired $57 million to an account in Israel at the end of July and was evidently allowed to flee the United States.
 
"Given Alexander's stature and military service," the Times reported, quoting unnamed law professors, "Israel might be reluctant to readily hand him over." One might reasonably ask what the 54-year old Alexander's "military service" has to do with Israel refusing to extradite him for crimes committed in the United States? While Alexander is obviously connected with Israel's military intelligence apparatus and George Soros through the mutually owned investment fund ComSor, what is not widely reported is his company's close links with Odigo, the Israeli-run instant messaging company that received – and conveyed – urgent warning messages about the imminent terror attacks on the World Trade Center several hours before the first plane hit.
 
The New York Times certainly must be well aware of the personal and business connection between Alexander and Odigo since they did an extensive interview with Avner and Maskit Ronen, the founders of Odigo, for their Sunday magazine in September 2000. The magazine article about the Ronen's, titled "Immigrants with an I.P.O." could have been titled "Immigrants on a Mission." The Ronens, both with military backgrounds in computer science, "put down few roots," during their first years in New York City, the Times reported. "They made no friends outside the office and had no taste at all for networking at Silicon Alley parties," the NYT magazine wrote. "They sought neither driver's licenses nor a local physician." The bizarre photograph in the article showed two silhouetted figures hidden in the dark. These were the Ronens, Israeli military officers on a mission in New York.
 
ODIGO INSTANT MESSAGES
 
There is ample evidence that many Israelis were forewarned of the attacks through an Israeli instant messaging service called Odigo. This story, which presents the clearest evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of the attacks, was reported only very briefly in the U.S. media – and then completely forgotten and deleted. According to the news reports, at least two Israel-based employees of Odigo reported having received warnings of an imminent attack in New York City hours before the first plane hit the WTC. Odigo, an Israeli-owned company had its U.S. headquarters only two blocks from the World Trade Center, yet Odigo failed to pass the warning it had received on to the authorities in New York, a move that would have saved thousands of lives.
 
"The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did – almost to the minute," Alex Diamandis, Odigo's vice president, said two weeks after 9-11. "It was possible that the attack warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but the company has not received reports of other recipients of the message," he added.
 
Based on the Israeli government figure that some 4,000 Israelis were expected to be in the World Trade Center at the time of the attacks, it seems evident that many Israeli Odigo users got the message. Odigo, which offers real-time messaging, has a feature called "People Finder" which allows a user to send an instant message to a large group based on a common characteristic, such as Israeli nationality. "People Finder" allows Odigo users to search for online "buddies," with filters like Israeli nationality, while maintaining user privacy at all times.
 
The Internet address of the sender of the warning was reportedly given to the FBI. Two months later it was reported that the FBI was still investigating the matter. Since then there have been no further media reports about the Odigo warning of 9-11.
 
As I have previously reported, Odigo, like Comverse and other Israel-based software companies, is really headquartered in Herzliya, Israel, the suburb of Tel Aviv where Israeli military intelligence headquarters are located. Typically, with these Israeli-intelligence linked outfits, the company's research and development, and any manufacturing, such as the "black box" computer surveillance equipment produced by Comverse, is all done in Israel. The U.S. offices merely function as distribution, marketing, and financial centers. In the case of Comverse, for example, the real parent company was Alexander's Tel Aviv-based Efrat Future Technology Ltd., which carried out "all research, development, and manufacturing," for Comverse, according to a 1992 article in the Jerusalem Post.
 
Shortly after 9-11, Odigo was completely taken over by Comverse Technology, which had been part owner of Odigo since early 2000, if not earlier. Shortly after 9-11, five executives from Comverse were reported to have profited by more than $267 million from "insider trading."
 
Avner Ronen, the "founder" of Odigo, was Vice President of Business Development of Comverse Technology in October 2005. This indicates that Ronen and Alexander, both Israeli military officers with computer backgrounds, have been close business partners since early 2000. "Comverse and Odigo have had a long-standing partnership and together have developed instant communications products and services that we have recently begun to offer to operators around the world," Zeev Bregman, CEO of the Israel-based Comverse Ltd., told the Jerusalem Post in May 2002.

Who's to Blame for the Terror in London?

August 31, 2006

The controlled press blames British-born Moslems for the terror bombings in London, but were the Pakistani lads from Leeds the architects of terror – or merely unwitting patsies?
 
Senior British, U.S. and Israeli political figures, the key players in the artificial "war on terror" – and the controlled press – blame "Islamic terrorists" for the July 7 terror bombings that killed 56 people in London. Blaming British-born Moslems of Pakistani ancestry has inflamed public opinion against Moslems in Britain. The allegations against the four suspects remain unproven, while evidence suggests the bombing was a synthetic "false flag" terror operation carried out by a state-sponsored intelligence agency.
 
Before the smoke had even cleared, USA Today, a paper with ties to the CIA, blamed "Islamic terrorists" for the bombings. The first sentence of the paper's July 8 front-page story pointed the finger at Islamic militants before any suspects had even been identified. The four explosions, it reported, "appeared to be the work of Islamic terrorists affiliated with those responsible for the Sept. 11 attack, officials said."
 
Jack Straw, the British Foreign Secretary, and Prime Minister Tony Blair were among the first to blame Islamic terrorists. "It has the hallmarks of an al-Qaeda related attack," Straw said. Since the bombing, the British Broadcasting Corp. (BBC) and other mass media outlets have accepted as fact the unproven allegations. Working from that assumption they debate how British-born Moslems could commit such senseless atrocities against fellow Britons. The question of who is actually responsible for the crime, however, is seldom raised.
 
The young suspects from the city of Leeds do not fit the terrorist profile for such a random and senseless terror bombing. Well assimilated Moslems and fathers of young children, one with a wife expecting a child, these young men seem to have been used as unwitting "mules" in a sinister "false flag" operation. Reports in the British press suggest the young men were duped into a scheme in which they thought they were carrying innocent packages of perfume, while a hidden hand inserted lethal bombs in their backpacks.
 
"The London bombers may have been duped into killing themselves," Jeff Edwards of the Daily Mirror wrote. "The evidence is compelling: The terrorists bought return rail tickets, and pay and display car park tickets, before boarding a train at Luton for London. None of the men was heard to cry 'Allah Akhbar!' – 'God is great' – usually screamed by suicide bombers as they detonate their bomb."
 
"Their devices were in large rucksacks which could be easily dumped instead of being strapped to their bodies. They carried wallets containing their driving licenses, bankcards and other personal items. Suicide bombers normally strip themselves of identifying material," Edwards noted.  
 
PERFUME BOMBERS
 
One of the suicide bombers, Jermaine Lindsay, 19, spent nearly $2,000 on expensive perfumes from different stores in the days prior to the bombing. According to some terror "experts," the terrorists thought the alcohol-based perfumes would act like napalm and the metal containers like shrapnel.
 
"British news reports about the suicide bombers sound like comedy scripts," 9-11 writer Eric Hufschmid said. "We are now expected to consider that these terrorists placed expensive containers of perfume around the bombs. However, the ridiculous aspects of these suicide bombers could indicate they were 'useful idiots.'"
 
"Perhaps these four young men were fooled into thinking that they were purchasing perfumes for quality control, or that they were checking the performance of sales clerks," Hufschmid said. "After receiving payment for purchasing the perfumes, they would have been more trusting of their 'employers', so they would be happy to deliver 'Do Not Open' packages on the morning of July 7. They would never suspect that somebody with a cell phone would detonate bombs in their backpacks while they were on the trains."
 
There are a number of clues that suggest the bombing was a sophisticated "false flag" operation carried out by the architects of the "war on terror." Such synthetic terror attacks are meant to shape public opinion to support the ongoing wars of aggression and occupation of Moslem and Arab states. In order to advance their "Clash of Civilizations" the architects of such terror seek to inflame public opinion against Moslems. The London bombings have achieved that, but why would British-born Moslems want to further an agenda that hurts their community most? Why did no one claim responsibility for the bombing? And why would Islamic terrorists kill innocent working people rather that hit a specific target?
 
The Israeli finance minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was staying at a hotel above the bombing that occurred on the Piccadilly line near Russell Square. Netanyahu, an extreme right-wing Israeli politician with the Likud party, is a chief architect of the "War on Terror." Since the 1980s, Netanyahu has written books urging the western democracies to wage war against the Arab and Moslem nations. The U.S.-led invasion and occupation of Iraq is exactly the kind of military action Netanyahu has called for since 1985.
 
Ariel Sharon, Israel's prime minister, phoned Blair after the bombing and called it a "vicious crime." There can be "no compromise with terror, which has become the major threat the free world is facing," Sharon said, equating Israel with "the free world."  
 
WHO KNEW?
 
According to Israeli and Associated Press (AP) reports, Scotland Yard and the Israeli Embassy in London were forewarned of the bombings. "British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said," Amy Triebel, an AP writer in Jerusalem reported at noon on July 7. But who warned Scotland Yard?
 
"The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room," the Israeli press reported. The source of the warning to British police was not revealed. Netanyahu was in London to speak at a conference to promote investment in Israel. Israeli Army Radio reported on July 8 that Scotland Yard had received intelligence warnings of the attacks shortly before they occurred. If, as claimed, the London bombing was carried out by a domestic Islamic terror cell, who informed Scotland Yard?
 
"The multiple, simultaneous explosions that took place today on the London transportation system were the work of perpetrators who had an operational capacity of considerable scope," Efraim Halevi wrote in The Jerusalem Post on July 7. How did Halevi know that the explosions were simultaneous? The underground bombings were not thought to have been simultaneous until British authorities reported their findings on July 9. Until then it was thought that the three subway bombs had gone off at 7:51, 7:56, and 8:17 a.m.
 
Like 9-11 and other "false flag" acts of terror, the London bombings occurred during a large-scale terrorist exercise that took place at the same time and locations as the actual explosions. Peter Power, former high-ranking employee of Scotland Yard and member of its Anti-Terrorist Branch, told BBC 5 and ITV News that his company, Visor Consulting, had carried out "crisis exercises," with an unnamed private company. The exercise envisioned "almost precisely" the bombings that actually occurred, he said. Power described the simulation of "simultaneous attacks on a underground and mainline station" and "bombs going off precisely at the railway stations" at which the actual bombings occurred.
 
"There were a few seconds when the audience didn't realize whether it was real or not," he said. On ITV, Power suggested that the unnamed partner in the terror exercise was concerned about Jewish buildings and banks being targeted. I contacted Visor Consultants, the mayor of the City of London, Scotland Yard, and the transportation authority to ask about the identity of the unnamed partner in the terror exercise.
 
A likely candidate is an Israeli company called International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) International N.V., an aviation and transportation security firm headed by "former [Israeli] military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies." Menachem Atzmon, convicted in Israel in 1996 for campaign finance fraud, and his business partner Ezra Harel, took over management of security at Boston's Logan Airport in 1999 through Huntleigh USA, a subsidiary of ICTS. Until his 1996 conviction, Atzmon was president of the Israel Development Fund (IDF), a U.S. tax-exempt foundation funneling money illegally to the Likud party of Sharon and Netanyahu, according to author Anton Chaitkin. Harel shares the name of Isser Harel, the co-founder of Israel's Mossad and first director of the Shin Bet, the internal security agency.
 
Atzmon and Harel were majority owners of ICTS. The convicted Likud criminal's [Atzmon] firm was in charge of security at Logan Airport, Chaitkin wrote – inspecting the validity of passports and visas, searching cargo, screening passengers – when two airliners were hijacked from there on Sept. 11, 2001, and demolished the World Trade Center towers in New York. ICTS also provided security at Newark airport.
 
At a trade exhibition in June, ICTS presented its "comprehensive security solution for the railroad and public transportation industry, which can be developed, tailored and implemented in a modular manner."
 
"Was ICTS International, or one of its affiliates, involved in the July 7 terror exercise in London?" I asked ICTS spokesperson Petra Snoek at company headquarters in Amstelveen, Holland. "Herewith I would like to inform you that ICTS International is not operating in the U.K.," Snoek wrote.
 
But ICTS International does have a subsidiary in Britain called ICTS U.K. Ltd., which is located in London's Tavistock House South, precisely where the double-decker bus was bombed on July 7. A receptionist at ICTS U.K. Ltd. said the office was temporarily closed after the bombing due to damage, but that the company was indeed part of ICTS International.

Who is behind the Attack on Professor Jones?

September 17, 2006

Like a modern-day Galileo or Socrates, the highly respected physicist, who has challenged with logic and scientific evidence the official explanation for the "collapse" of the World Trade Center, has been banned from teaching classes at his university.
 
On September 7, the third day of the new fall semester at Brigham Young University (BYU) in Provo, Utah, Steven E. Jones, professor of physics and 9-11 researcher, was suddenly banned by university authorities from teaching the physics classes he has taught for the past 21 years. Jones was unexpectedly suspended with pay after participating in a radio show in which he had been cunningly lured to comment on a subject outside of his field and asked about the "motivation" of "the Neo-Conservatives" blamed for the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.
 
Jones, a soft-spoken physicist who specializes in metal-catalyzed fusion, archaeometry, and solar energy, joined the 9-11 research effort after being intrigued by the unexplained collapse of the 47-story WTC 7 at 5:25 p.m. on the afternoon of 9-11. Jones scientific interest was sparked after having read reports that molten iron had been found in the rubble of all three collapsed WTC towers, including WTC 7.
 
As I discovered in the summer of 2002, "literally molten steel" had been found, more than a month after the collapse, at the bases of the collapsed towers, where their load-bearing central support columns connected to the bedrock. "Such persistent and intense residual heat, 70 feet below the surface, could explain how these crucial structural supports failed," I wrote at the time.
 
Peter Tully, president of Tully Construction of Flushing, New York, told me he had seen pools of "literally molten steel" at the World Trade Center, where his company had removed debris, weeks after the three towers collapsed. Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, Maryland, confirmed the presence of molten metal at the site.
 
"Yes," Loizeaux said, "hot spots of molten steel in the basements." These incredibly hot areas were found "at the bottoms of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven [basement] levels," Loizeaux said.
 
The molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed," he said. Loizeaux also confirmed that molten iron had been found in the rubble of WTC 7, the tower owned by Larry Silverstein which was neither hit by an airplane nor severely damaged, but which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon of 9-11.
 
In 2005, Jones began investigating the collapse of WTC 7 and the large amounts of molten iron seen falling from the burning South Tower. These two subjects remain completely unexplained in the official literature on 9-11.
 
"The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time," the FEMA-sponsored WTC Building Performance Study of 2002 concluded. "Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence," it said. The way that the building collapsed within its own footprint suggested that it was an "internal collapse," the report said. The long awaited NIST report on the collapse of WTC 7 is supposed to be released next year.
 
BYU ANALYSIS OF MOLTEN METAL
 
The question of what caused the 47 load-bearing central columns of the twin towers to fall has been a fundamental question about the unexplained collapses of the WTC towers. The fire-induced collapse scenario does not explain why these crucial internal box columns would have failed.
 
Last summer, after obtaining pieces of the hardened molten fragments from the WTC, Jones and other scientists at BYU conducted extensive laboratory tests and found that the molten metal was primarily composed of iron with slight traces of structural steel. From the physical and photographic evidence Jones concluded that Thermite, or a similar aluminothermic process, was used to slice the central core columns and bring down the twin towers.
 
Jones, along with 2 other physicists and a geologist at BYU, conducted Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) and Electron Microprobe analyses on the samples. The previously molten metal samples were predominately iron, with very little chromium, Jones said, along with uncommon chemical elements in abundance such as fluorine and manganese. Aluminum and sulfur were also present, which he said would be expected from thermate reactions. Thermate is Thermite, granulated or powdered aluminum and ferrous oxide, with 2 percent sulfur added to the mixture to increase the steel-cutting effectiveness of the reaction.
 
"The results," Jones says in a presentation he recently gave at Idaho State University, "coupled with visual evidence at the scene such as the flowing yellow-hot liquid metal still red after falling about 500 feet, provide compelling evidence that Thermite reaction compounds (aluminothermics) were used, meaning Thermite was deliberately placed in both WTC Towers and WTC 7."
 
THE RADIO TRAP
 
On September 5, Doug Fabrizio, executive producer of RadioWest on the University of Utah's public radio station (NPR) invited Jones to come on his one-hour program to discuss his 9-11 research. Before Jones could even discuss his research, however, Fabrizio was aggressively quizzing him on the "Neo-Conservative motivation" for the attacks, and repeatedly pressed him to comment on a subject far outside his field -- to explain who within the government could have been involved in the attacks if not 19 Arab hijackers with box cutters.
 
Because Jones is a physicist and is not engaged in the political background of "false flag" terrorism attacks, he reluctantly responded to Fabrizio's question by citing the author Webster Tarpley's analysis that individuals such as Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle, who are linked to the "international banking cartel," have been named, by Tarpley, as possible suspects.
 
Jones was careful to say that these were not his ideas, but Tarpley's, and that these were possible suspects that Tarpley had named. Jones is generally reluctant to discuss the political implications of his findings, and his comments about Wolfowitz and Perle on the radio program created quite a "buzz on campus," the Deseret Morning News reported.
 
After interviewing Jones for a brief 20 minutes, Fabrizio said goodbye to Jones and turned the remainder of the hour over to a discussion of conspiracy theories with two Jewish professors, a Robert Goldberg from the University of Utah and Gary Fine from Northwestern. The first caller was a William Tumpowsky, chairman of the Jewish Community Relations Council and board member of the local Israeli-fund raising organization, the United Jewish Federation. Tumpowsky charged that Jones' was using code language to make anti-Semitic allegations. Goldberg supported this accusation.
 
Starting from this outrageous allegation, Fabrizio continued the hostile discussion with Goldberg and Fine, with frequent allegations that the now-absent physics professor was nothing more than an anti-Semite indulging in conspiracy fantasies. The most significant evidence brought forth by Jones' research was not even discussed.
 
Within two days, the authorities at BYU apparently caved to organized Jewish pressure and put Jones on paid leave. Students who had already begun their fall physics courses with Jones will be taught by other faculty members for the rest of the semester as university administrators review his statements and research. Repeated calls to BYU spokeswoman Carri Jenkins about the banning of Jones from the classroom were not returned. Jenkins has not responded any of my questions left with BYU's communications office.
 
"I'm not sure we did it the right way," Fabrizio said after he accepted responsibility for the radio program that sparked the sacking of Jones. Asked why he had pressed Jones to make a statement about who was behind the attacks, Fabrizio said, "I was interested in what motivated the science." This is, however, a less than honest answer because Jones has always stressed in his presentations that it is the unexplained collapse of WTC 7 and the presence of molten iron in the rubble that motivate his investigation.
 
The American Association of University Professors criticized BYU's decision to place Jones on paid leave for his comments on the radio program. AAUP general secretary Roger Bowen called BYU's decision "distressing" and said Jones shouldn't be removed from teaching classes for statements made outside the classroom. "Academic freedom also protects extramural utterances, that is, statements made by faculty outside the classroom when they speak as citizens," Bowen told the Deseret Morning News. "It's very clear there never should be official retribution for faculty who exercise their rights as citizens, with the very careful disclaimer they are not speaking on behalf of the university."
 
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education joined the criticism of the BYU decision against Jones. "BYU is literally the example we use of a university that does not promise strong free speech or academic freedom protections," FIRE president Greg Lukianoff said.
 

Christopher Bollyn and Professor Steven E. Jones discussing the molten metal seen cascading from the 81st floor of WTC 2 and found under the rubble of all three "collapsed" towers of the World Trade Center. The bag in front of Bollyn contains samples taken from the molten metal found at the WTC site. These samples are primarily molten iron, the end product of the Thermite reaction along with aluminum oxide and tremendous heat release. "The data doesn't lie," Jones said. "I have to speak the truth the best I know it -- as a scientist I feel the responsibility to speak out." 

Rahm Emanuel's Dirty Secret

November 17, 2006

The new "golden boy" of the Democrat Party, the Israeli-American congressman Rahm Emanuel, is the son of terrorist. Really, I am not making this up, the chief power-broker of the Democrat Party, the short and foul-mouthed Israeli named Rahm, is the son of a real living terrorist.
 
So, what do we do as citizens of the land of the free and the home of the brave fighting the War on Terror? Do we run and hide from the foul-mouthed little Israeli who swears for effect - or do we demand answers? How can we respect a U.S. Congressman who served in a foreign army and whose father was a terrorist?
 
Rep. Rahm Emanuel, the Democrat congressman for the 5th District of Illinois in Chicago is the son of an Israeli terrorist. Rahm's father, Benjamin, was a member of the Irgun, the Zionist terrorist organization that coined the word "terrorist" as they blew up hotels, train stations, and other buildings in Palestine in the 1930s and 40s.
 
Rahm is an Israeli national who joined the Israeli Army in 1991 to defend Zion from Saddam's Scuds. Irgun, the army of his father, is short for Irgun Zvai Leumi, which means something like "National Military Organization" in Hebrew. As a matter of fact, the Irgun was simply a terrorist Zionist group that operated in Palestine from 1931 to 1948. They killed innocent Palestinians and British soldiers and blew up buildings.
 
After 1948 they became part of the new Israeli government and did the same thing. The Irgun even has a website with pictures of the buildings they blew up. In Israel, the Irgun is referred to as Etzel, an acronym of the group's Hebrew initials. The Irgun was considered a terrorist organization by the British authorities as well as by mainstream Zionist and Jewish organizations, such as the Jewish Agency, the Haganah and the Histadrut. Irgun was founded by Ze'ev Jabotinsky and the relationship with Jabotinsky's Revisionist Zionism made it the predecessor to Israel's right-wing Herut and Likud parties.
 
The sons and daughters of Irgun members are in the highest positions of power in Israel. Rahm Emanuel has a similar position in the U.S. government. Of course you won't find anything Rep. Emanuel's father's exploits in Palestine on Rahm's website. The late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago called Rahm Emanuel the "Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad."
 
Skolnick, an independent journalist, went on to say that Emanuel's father Benjamin had been "part of the Israeli assassin team that murdered Sweden's Count [Folke] Bernadotte" in 1948. Bernadotte was the envoy of the United Nations in Palestine who sought to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews from "beyond the pale." Was Skolnick correct? Skolnick does not document his claims so I checked into his allegations.
 
"Beyond the pale" would certainly describe where Rahm Emanuel's family came from. His father's family came to Palestine from somewhere in the Ukraine in 1917, according to what Dr. Benjamin M. Emanuel told me. Dr. Emanuel now lives on Locust Road in Wilmette, Illinois. Benjamin, speaking with a thick Israeli accent, told me that his father's name was Ezekiel Auerbach and that his mother's name was Pinina or something like that. He said it meant "pearl" in Hebrew. Asked about his role in the Irgun, Ben told me he had been a "simple soldier."
 
The Emanuel family name was Auerbach until 1936, although they are not related to the famous rabbinical family of Germany and Krakow named Auerbach. Ben said that his family was from Russia. His father Ezekiel supposedly changed the family name to Emanuel when his son with that name died fighting Palestinians in 1936. Many European Jewish families in Palestine changed their names to make themselves sound more authentic.
Sheinerman became Sharon, Yezernitzky became Shamir, and Auerbach became Emanuel, and so on. In this way the names of many thousands of European Jews vanished as the immigrants started new lives in Palestine.
 
Ben told me that Emanuel Auerbach had died from "shrapnel in the knee" in 1936. When I asked him today for details on this incident he suddenly decided that he did not want to do an interview on the phone and hung up. But before he terminated the conversation, Dr. Benjamin Auerbach-cum-Emanuel told me that he had been a member of the Irgun and had served under Menachem Begin. He told me that he had never met Begin and had not smuggled weapons into Palestine, other news reports notwithstanding.
 
Naftali Bendavid (not a local reporter) with the Chicago Tribune spent 18 months working with Rahm Emanuel to prepare a story for the week after the mid-term elections although Naftali did not think that there was enough room in the 9-page story to mention the salient fact that Dr. Benjamin Emanuel had been a member of the terrorist Irgun. Naftali Bendavid wrote a 9-page cover story for last Sunday's paper, which took up the entire second section of the Chicago Tribune. From his office in Washington, Naftali knew all about Irgun when I spoke with him on the phone. When I said it was an egregious omission to leave out the fact that Rahm's father had been in the Irgun, he said he just couldn't figure how to squeeze that bit into the 9-page article.
 
Rahm's mother is Martha Smulevitz, who married the Ben the Israeli in August 1955. Ben told me that they met in Chicago. I asked if she was related to the Smulevitz family that was living in Palestine in the 1930s. He said no. There are Smulevitz's and Shmuelevitz's all throughout the Zionist invasion of Palestine: one was hanged by the Brits and another was the chief of staff for Menachem Begin.
 
It would, however, be most interesting if Rahm's father were actually related to Moshe Auerbach, the Zionist who went to Berlin with Pino Ginzburg to arrange the transfer of Jews and money to Palestine with the Nazi regime. And you wonder where Rahm Emanuel got his "chutzpah" from? 

The Zionist Network behind 9-11

December 7, 2006

Sixty-five years ago Japanese bombers launched an early morning surprise attack on the U.S. fleet at Pearl Harbor killing some 2,400 seamen and bringing the United States into World War II. The next day, President Franklin D. Roosevelt called December 7, 1941 "a date which will live in infamy" and asked Congress for a declaration of war against Japan. September 11, 2001 is another date which will live in infamy. Like the attack on Pearl Harbor, 9-11 was a surprise attack to most Americans -- but not all.
 
Like the Japanese attack on the U.S. fleet, 9-11 was a catastrophic and transforming event that brought the United States into war, the so-called "War on Terror." Unlike Pearl Harbor, however, 9-11 was not committed by an easily identifiable foe. Pronouncements by President George W. Bush and senior government officials notwithstanding, the solid evidence pinning the blame for the catastrophic terror attacks of 9-11 on 19 Arabs with box cutters has yet to be seen.
 
Despite the various government sponsored reports and commissions about the events of September 11, 2001, the attacks and the destruction they caused remain largely uninvestigated. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has not released the evidence it has to support the stated position of the government that 19 Arabs working with Al Qaida carried out these attacks on their own. To this day, the FBI has not even provided the physical evidence to identify the aircraft involved in the attacks, although there must be an adequate number of identifiable airplane parts from the four crash sites to do so. The FBI is clearly not interested in proving anything about 9-11 to the nation or the public.
 
WHO'S IN CONTROL?
 
So what's going on? Why are the most catastrophic terror attacks in U.S. history uninvestigated and why is the interpretation of the attacks left to the controlled media and politicians? Who has the power to control the media, the government, and the FBI to conceal the truth about what really happened on 9-11? To understand who is really behind 9-11 requires a comprehensive investigation of the key players who played a role or who controlled the non-investigation and subsequent media-driven "interpretation" of the terror attacks.
 
Today, five years and three months after 9-11, we are able to look back at the people who have played these key roles. What we find is a small group of people who are linked in a global Zionist network, individuals who are connected by family, ethnic, and business ties to an organized network dedicated to supporting the state of Israel and its agenda.
By exposing the members of this Zionist network and their connection to 9-11 and the so-called "War on Terror," we can identify the chief architects, sub-contractors, and workers who pulled off the false-flag terror attacks of September 11, 2001.
 
THE ARCHITECTS
 
Shortly after 9-11, I spoke with Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of Germany's domestic intelligence service, the Verfassungsschutz. He said that "the deathly precision" and "the magnitude of planning" behind the attacks would have required "years of planning." Such a sophisticated operation, Werthebach said, would require the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a "loose group" of terrorists like the one allegedly led by Mohammed Atta. Many people would have been involved in the planning of such an operation, Werthebach said. The absence of leaks indicates that the attacks were "state organized actions," he said.
 
Andreas von Bülow, the former German parliamentarian, served on the commission which oversees the three branches of the German secret service from 1969 to 1994. Von Bülow told me in the fall of 2001 that he believed that the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, was behind the 9-11 terror attacks. These attacks, he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs and boost military and security spending. "You don't get the higher echelons," von Bülow said, referring to the "architectural structure" which masterminds such terror attacks. At this level, he said, the organization doing the planning, such as Mossad, is primarily interested in affecting public opinion.
 
In a classic false-flag terror attack, the architectural level planners will use unwitting or corrupt "guns for hire" in order to have the blame assigned to the desired target. The terrorists who actually carry out the crimes are what von Bülow calls "the working level," such as the 19 Arabs who allegedly hijacked the planes on Sept. 11. "The working level is part of the deception," he said. "Ninety-five percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation," von Bülow said. The deception is then widely propagated in the mainstream media creating an accepted version of events. "Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions," he said. "Those who differ are labeled as crazy."
 
"YEARS OF PLANNING"
 
The "years of planning" that Eckehardt Werthebach referred to are obvious to anyone who has read the real history of 9-11. The smaller false-flag terror attacks that preceded the catastrophic terror of 9-11 were meant to instill in the mind of the public the fear of a massive attack in the United States. The equally suspect and unproven bombings of the federal building in Oklahoma City and the first attack in the World Trade Center were meant to prepare public opinion for "the transforming event" of 9-11.
 
At the academic level, the architects of 9-11 have been working on U.S. public opinion since the mid-1980s to prepare the political and media elites for a catastrophic terror attack on American soil, and beyond that to focus on how the U.S. should respond to such an attack. Benjamin Netanyahu, the American-educated hard-line former prime minister of Israel, is probably the most conspicuous architect of terrorism and the so-called "War on Terror." Netanyahu, a Jabotinsky Zionist of the right wing Likud party, published a book in 1986 entitled Terrorism: How the West Can Win in which he laid out precisely the blueprint for what has become the "War on Terror" in Iraq and Afghanistan. Netanyahu's book, and its seriously flawed and racist thesis, has been rewritten, reprinted, and propagated ad nauseam.
 
Netanyahu's thesis is that Israel is attacked by "terrorists" only because it is "western and democratic," like European nations and the United States. For this reason, Netanyahu says, Americans and Europeans need to join the fight against those who are opposed to the Zionist state of Israel. In Netanyahu's distorted view of the world, Palestinian grievances and their nationalist aspirations have no place or merit. Palestinians and Arabs are simply "terrorists," he says, against whom the West should wage war, as we now do. Reading the controlled press or listening to the pundits on the U.S. mass media, it is clear that they have acted as agents of Zionist propaganda and should be held accountable for having snookered the United States into fighting costly and disastrous wars against Israel's enemies.
 
"CATASTROPHIC TERRORISM"
 
There are other agents, many of them highly-placed Americans, who clearly and specifically pushed the agenda, which we now call the "War on Terror," as a response to a catastrophic terror attack long before 9-11.
Three men authored an article in 1998 in Foreign Affairs, the bi-monthly publication of the Council on Foreign Relations, in which they laid out what changes would need to made within the U.S. government in the wake of "catastrophic terrorism," which is also the title of the article.
 
The "Catastrophic Terrorism" article, written by Ashton B. Carter, John M. Deutch, and Philip D. Zelikow, appeared in the last issue of Foreign Affairs in 1998. It begins with the strange subtitle "Imagining the Transforming Event," as if what was actually desired by the authors was a transformation of the U.S. government and the way Americans live. The authors of the article, like Netanyahu, do not even mention the political causes of terrorism. Understanding the causes of terrorism in an effort to prevent it does not even occur to them. No, these three architects are busy "imagining the transforming event" -- and how to respond to it.
 
This article is clearly an architectural level document. It is meant to explain what should be done in the event of the catastrophic terror attack its authors are "imagining." For this reason, the authors deserve to be investigated to see what kind of relationship they might have to those who carried out the false flag terror attacks of 9-11.
 
"LIKE PEARL HARBOR"
 
"Catastrophic terrorism has moved from far-fetched horror to a contingency that could happen next month," the essay warns. "Although the United States still takes conventional terrorism seriously it is not yet prepared for the new threat of catastrophic terrorism. The bombings in East Africa killed hundreds. A successful attack with weapons of mass destruction could certainly take thousands, or tens of thousands, of lives. If the device that exploded in 1993 under the World Trade Center had been nuclear, or had effectively dispersed a deadly pathogen, the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force. More violence could follow, either further terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks. Belatedly, Americans would judge their leaders negligent for not addressing terrorism more urgently."
 
With amazing prescience the authors were right about all eight things they said "might" happen as a result of an attack of "catastrophic terrorism" like Pearl Harbor. The authors go on to recommend specifically what the U.S. government should do in the wake of such an event of "catastrophic terrorism," which they concluded is "an eminent threat."

•    The U.S. government should have the authority to monitor any group and its potential state sponsors that might have the motive and the means to use weapons of mass destruction;


•    The United States needs a new institution to gather intelligence on catastrophic terrorism - a National Terrorism Intelligence Center - that would collect and analyze information so it could warn of suspected catastrophic terrorist acts ahead of time;

•    Washington must now work with other countries to extend the prohibitions against development or possession of weapons of mass destruction;

•    International norms should adapt so that states are obliged to reassure other states that are worried and to take reasonable measures to prove they are not secretly developing weapons of mass destruction. Failure to supply such proof or to prosecute the criminals living within their borders should entitle worried nations to take all necessary actions for their self-defense;

•    The United States should aspire as a long-term objective to identify every person and all freight entering the country;

•    The United States should support a system to ensure that every country's passports are computer readable, with every country's passport control station linked to a database.
 
 
In the same issue of Foreign Affairs in which the prescient essay on "catastrophic terrorism" appeared there is an essay about Osama Bin Laden's "License to Kill" by Bernard Lewis, the British Zionist mastermind of academia. After reading the Lewis article, in which he says Osama Bin Laden calls on Muslims to "kill the Americans and plunder their possessions wherever he finds them and whenever he can" there can be no doubt who should be the prime suspect behind any event of "catastrophic terrorism." So who are the authors of this prescient article about how the U.S. should respond to an act of "catastrophic terrorism?"
 
ASHTON B. CARTER
 
Ashton B. Carter is a Ford Foundation Professor of Science and International Affairs at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government and a former Assistant Secretary of Defense. The 1998 essay he co-wrote with Deutch and Zelikow was published in a book he wrote with William Perry entitled Preventive Defense: An American Security Strategy for the 21st Century.
 
Carter is also a member of Board of Trustees for MITRE, where he was a trustee from 1988 to 1993. The MITRE Corp. is a major defense contracting organization based in Bedford, Massachusetts, which is headed by the former Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), Dr. James Rodney Schlesinger. MITRE's crucial communication, command and control systems clearly failed on 9-11, something that deserves investigating.
 
From 2001 to 2002, Carter served on the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism and advised on the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Carter is also a senior partner in a company called Global Technology Partners, LLC (GTP), of which William J. Perry is the chairman. John Mark Deutch, the former Director of Central Intelligence and co-author of the article, is also a senior partner in GTP.
 
AFFILIATE OF ROTHSCHILD
 
What is GTP? Global Technology Partners, LLC is "an exclusive affiliate of Rothschild North America, formed to make acquisitions of and investments in technology, defense and aerospace-related companies," according to a biographical sketch of one of the corporation's senior partners, Paul G. Kaminski. Elsewhere it is described as "an aerospace and defense investment banking boutique affiliated with the Rothschild Group" or "a professional services firm associated with the Rothschild Group of investment banks."
 
So Ashton B. Carter, John M. Deutch, William J. Perry, and the other fellows at GTP work for the Rothschild family, the Jewish financiers of governments -- and founders of the state of Israel.
 
JOHN MARK DEUTCH
 
This explains how Deutch, who was born in Belgium, and his father, who was born in Russia and who only came to the United States in 1940, were so quickly advanced within the Washington power structure. Deutch's father, Michael J. Deutch, was born in Smolensk, Russia in 1907. The Deutch family came to the United States in 1940 where Michael quickly became deputy director at the War Production Board, in charge of making synthetic rubber.
 
A December 27, 1946 article in the Chicago Tribune entitled "List Alien 'Rulers' in U.S." listed some of the foreigners found in a secret 71-page report who had received high government wartime posts. Michael J. Deutch was one of them. "Correspondence passing between the Secretary of the Interior and the Office of War Mobilization indicate that Deutch was pushed up the ladder of promotion with unusual vigor by some one," the secret report from the House Committee on Un-American Activities said.
 
Michael Deutch was a Russian Jew whose family supposedly "fled the Bolshevik Revolution for Belgium." In Belgium, where he studied chemical engineering, he married Rachel Fischer, the daughter of Jean "Yonah" Fischer, a diamond merchant of Antwerp who ran the Zionist Federation of Belgium. This connection could explain why Deutch was promoted so quickly when he came to Washington.
 
John Deutch's maternal grandfather, Yonah Fischer, was a prominent Zionist and friend of Israel's first president, Chaim Weizmann. Fischer was a very high level Zionist within the international military-political network centered in London. Yonah had extensive business arrangements in Palestine/Israel and even started a town which is named after him -- Kefar Yonah.
 
John Deutch has served as a director of Citigroup and Citibank since 1987. He is also a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
 
PHILIP D. ZELIKOW
 
Philip David Zelikow is all over 9-11, its aftermath, and the subsequent wars in the Middle East. Three years after warning of "catastrophic terrorism," Zelikow became the Executive Director of the 9-11 Commission, the appointed government whitewash which utterly failed to address the key questions and evidence of the terror attacks of 9-11.
 
Zelikow, from Houston, served on President George W. Bush's transition team in 2001. After Bush took office, Zelikow was named to the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, and served on the National Commission on Federal Election Reform, which produced the extremely flawed Help America Vote Act of 2002.
 
Zelikow had been a career foreign service officer overseas and served on to the National Security Council. More recently, Zelikow was a member of the Iraq Study Group, which pretended to study what went wrong with the disastrous, illegal, and ill-advised war that Jewish Zionist Neo-Cons, the controlled media, and the Bush administration all pushed so hard for. Zelikow, the grandson of a Russian Jewish immigrant tailor, is very close to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. He can be seen as having been her legal and Zionist handler. Zelikow joined the National Security Council in the George H.W. Bush administration, at the same time as Condoleezza Rice. Only recently Zelikow resigned as Counselor of the U.S. Department of State, where he served as a senior policy advisor to the Secretary of State.

The Global Technology Partners who work for the Rothschild family in North America. Chairman of the GTC LLC, William Perry sits in the middle. The Zionist agent John Deutch is standing behind him in the blue sweater. Ashton B. Carter is standing at the far left. 


©2017 Christopher Bollyn | Sitemap | christopher at bollyn dot com