|
|
|
|
|
Home
Support Bollyn.com
February 8, 2010 "This is Chris Bollyn's website. He is the bravest and most persecuted reporter in America." Bollyn.com provides its readers with important information that is simply not available on television, in the mainstream media, or on other websites. My analysis of the fraudulent "War on Terror," for example, has been shown to be correct as the Christmas Day terror "bombing" in Detroit reveals. On November 18, I warned - and explained why - that there was a "high risk" of an "Al Qaida" false-flag terror incident. I don't expect any recognition for having made this prediction because I know very well that my analysis of the Zionist terrorism of 9-11 and the "War on Terror" is ABSOLUTELY TABOO among the people who control the mass media in the United States, which is why it is not discussed or debated. But that doesn't mean that my thesis is not correct. One of the most important chapters from my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, entitled the "Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network behind 9-11", for example, was scrutinized by a fact-checker in Britain who was hostile to my thesis and who examined more than 100 facts contained in that chapter. The fact-checking, which was commissioned by a European publisher, found that every single fact I present in that key chapter of my book is 100 percent correct. My readers will appreciate the fact that my terror warning of November 18 and my larger analysis of the Zionist/Jewish terror network behind 9-11 have been validated. The recently released 551-page Dutch report from The Hague finding that the war in Iraq is illegal (hence a Crime Against the Peace or war of aggression) is certainly not news to my readers either. I had explained in great detail the illegality of the threat of U.S./U.K. aggression against Iraq (and Afghanistan) long before the first shot was fired. I had even asked the question directly of the French foreign ministry at a press conference in Paris in early 2003. The killing of the Iranian nuclear scientist in Tehran with a remote-controlled bomb on his motorcycle certainly appears to be a classic Mossad hit. This is a kind of assassination method the Mossad has employed for decades (see John Le Carre's book or movie on the Mossad Little Drummer Girl), as I have written about in great detail in the early chapters of my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. I am not compensated for my research and do not carry any advertising on my site, but my efforts take time and money. Support from my readers is what keeps this website going. If you find my work worthwhile, please donate to Bollyn.com today by clicking on the donation button in the left-hand margin or send a donation via PayPal (choose the "personal gift" method) to bollyn@bollynbooks.com -- Thank you for your support.
A Note of Gratitude
February 8, 2010 Valentine's Day is Christopher Bollyn's birthday. I am grateful for the donations received in February to support my work, especially from J.A. in Kuwait. Thank you for your support. I received Christmas letters from several supporters. One of them penned this message: Mr. Bollyn: All the best... I also received this very nice Christmas greeting: I wish to add some brief words of encouragement for the marvelous work you have undertaken on behalf of all of us who value our freedom. Thank you for your courage, your integrity and your amazing tenacity in exposing the evil which is gripping our planet.
At times our own light goes out and is rekindled by a spark from another person. Each of us has cause to think with deep gratitude of those who have lighted the flame within us. I am very grateful to those who have donated in support of my work in December, especially S.C. in Missouri, A.S. in Panama, G.S. in Australia, T.B. in Saskatchewan, N.R. in New York, E.H. in Canada, P.C. in Japan, J.S. in California, A.S. in London, G.S. in Indiana, M.L. in Maryland, J.B. in Arkansas, S.D. in Aberdeenshire, J.L. in Sacramento, J.R. in Illinois, and T.M. in Germany. Many thanks to you all and those who supported my work in 2009. I couldn't do it without your help. I received this encouraging note from a new supporter: I would like to thank YOU for your brave and continuous effort to bring the painful truth to light. I admire your tireless research and linguistic intelligence. I shared with my husband the other day, that you are the only person out there who writes and explains the tragic 9/11 events so cohesively with plenty of scientific evidence and ‘to the point’, that it will be hard for anyone to dismiss it as yet another conspiracy theory. Don't worry, I won't give up. It is always nice to hear from supporters. We are all in this together and it really is a collective effort to find the truth and save our nation(s). And a big thanks to those who donated in October, especially J.F. in Colorado, K.D. in New York, T.B. in Saskatchewan, D.G. in Connecticut, V.C. in Ireland, E.H. in Canada, A.S. in Scotland, J.M. in Illinois, R.A. in Philadelphia, and G.S. in Australia. My sincere thanks to you all. Your support is greatly appreciated. In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it—and the glow from that fire can truly light the world. And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man. This note of appreciation came from a supporter in Canada: ... from a reader in France: Thanks for your brave investigations to bring light on Truth. You stand out among the best. Many thanks for your contributations to a Cassandra-like society...It is thanks to the likes of you et al that one learns of the manipulation/control of society. May you be protected by the good (especially in the security service). At a time of Depression, which affects all the good (and the stupid), I admire your intelligence in assessing the current debacle. I am heartened that sincere people consider my work "honorable" and donate to support my efforts. I am very grateful for those who supported my 9-11 research in the month of September, especially D.A. in Toronto, G.W. in Germany, D.M., H.M., and K.B. in California, R.L. in Minnesota, J.A. in Michigan, R.W. in Arizona, K.M. in Australia, M.B. in New Mexico, D.M. in Denver, T.N. in Australia, S.M. in Omaha, M.P., J.A., R.H., and E.H. in Canada, J.D. in England, J.S. in San Marcos, W.F. in New York, J.C. in Long Beach, P.C. in Tokyo, W.H. in The Netherlands, M.P. in Connecticut, D.B. in Wyoming, J.D. in Illinois, J.H. in Quebec, J.M. in Oregon, G.S. in Queensland, L.B. in Tucson, E.J. in Chicago, E.B. in Palm Springs, J.B. in Arkansas, and M.S. in Louisiana. Thank you all very much. Feeling gratitude and not expressing it is like wrapping a present and not giving it. These kind words of encouragement came with a generous donation: There is no better place that I can place my money than with you. Dollars become credible currency when placed in your hands. Please keep up the fine, fine work, and accept my gratitude for your devotion to this supremely important part of our lives. Your efforts are unique and singular. A reader in South Africa sent this note after reading the first 12 chapters of my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World: I have just read the 12 chapters of your 9-11 book. I am gobsmacked! Your research is overwhelmingly precise and alarmingly accurate. It took me four days, (with research) and even though I am well researched on the Zionazis, I was flabbergasted at the attention to detail so far. We, as inhabitants of this planet, will be forever grateful for your time and dedication to this cause, and, in time, will owe you a huge debt of gratitude in the future. Thank you for your incredible work. A supporter in Hawaii sent me this nice note: Aloha, Chris,
The Real Reason for Delaying the 9-11 Trial
Updated: February 8, 2010 On February 7, President Barack Obama acknowledged fierce opposition to his plans to bring accused 9-11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) to justice in New York, but would not rule out such a trial.
The administration says that it wants to prosecute Sheikh Mohammed and four co-defendants in a federal court in lower Manhattan, close to the site of the World Trade Center attack which killed nearly 3,000 people in 2001. NO SURPRISE After a dinner in New York on Dec. 14, Steven Spinola, president of the Real Estate Board of New York, pulled aside David Axelrod, President Obama’s closest adviser, to convey an urgent plea: move the 9/11 trial out of Manhattan. The Obama administration will not have an open 9-11 trial because it would expose the fraud that the person said to be Khalid Sheik Mohammed is not the terror mastermind of 9-11. He is, in fact, not even Khalid Sheik Mohammed. The person said to be KSM is a "feeble-minded" man named Ahmed Abdul Qudoos. He has been scapegoated and made to fill in for the real KSM, who was killed in Pakistan.
The U.S. government cannot hold an open trial in the United States with the false KSM because there are people in the United States who knew and remember the real KSM, such as his former teachers in North Carolina. As I wrote in 2007: Furthermore, the real KSM was a person who had traveled and worked extensively across Asia and had lived in many foreign countries, from the United States to the Philippines to Bosnia. With this level of education and foreign travel, the real KSM would have a much greater command of the English language than what we find in the transcript. There were no defense attorneys or members of the press allowed to the secret hearing in which the military tribunal heard the confession of the alleged architect of 9/11. "The Detainee served as the head of the Al Qaida military committee and was Osama bin Laden's principal Al Qaida operative who directed the 11 September 2002 attacks in the United States," the statement said. “I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z,’’ the detainee said through an interpreter, according to the transcript of the hearing. He also claimed responsibility for the 1993 bombing at the World Trade Center. The detainee sat with an Arabic interpreter to his left and a U.S. military officer who was his official representative to his right. "I not take the oath…" the detainee said in broken English about why he was not taking an oath in the court. "Just to explain for this one, does not mean I'm not saying that I'm lying. When I not take oath does not mean I'm lying." "I understand," the tribunal president said. But how can such meaningless gibberish coming from an unidentified detainee who has not taken an oath be seen by anyone as a credible confession? No photographs accompanied the release of the KSM confession and there are very few photos of the person who is accused of being the terrorist mastermind of our time. To see if the disheveled, hairy, and overweight person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed resembled the mechanical engineering student that studied in Greensboro in the 1980s, I contacted the engineering faculty of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University. David E. Klett, a retired professor of thermodynamics, had the real KSM in several of his classes. Asked about the photos of the person said to be the terror mastermind, Klett said, "I did not recognize that person. I never saw that face before." - Source: "The Absence of Justice for 9/11 Victims", Christopher Bollyn, March 20, 2007 To understand the real reason for the abrupt cancellation of the planned 9-11 trial in Manhattan, read the following article, especially the articles at the bottom about the identity fraud concerning the real KSM. "Terror Risk High as Obama Ponders Afghan Fiasco" Christopher Bollyn, "Why Afghanistan?" September 28, 2009
Dying in Vain - Why Afghanistan?
Updated - February 8, 2010
Have the Americans and Europeans killed in Afghanistan died in vain? That is the case with eight American soldiers killed last October trying to defend a remote outpost in eastern Afghanistan that the military did not deem important enough to reinforce or make more secure. What really is the mission in Afghanistan? Have all these people died in vain? The administration of Barack Hussein Obama II has requested $70 billion (U.S. dollars) more for its war in Afghanistan for 2010 (on top of $230 billion already spent). In comparison, the U.S. will spend only $1.6 billion on Amtrak, the national passenger railroad system. That means that Obama spends about $192 million per day in Afghanistan on a senseless and illegal war, which is more than the U.S. spends in 44 days to provide passenger rail service for 300 million Americans. The U.S. spends more in 9 days on the Afghanistan fiasco than it spends in one year to provide clean and efficient rail service for the entire nation. This is hardly the "change" America wants or needs, Mr. Obama.
Note: Jerry Mazza, an editor of Online Journal, has an excellent article, "Ramping up Afghanistan war to control Caspian oil and gas transport routes" that supports my thesis, first published in October 2001, that the war in Afghanistan is a military campaign to secure pipeline routes for the Israeli-owned gas of Turkmenistan. The Mazza article is highly recommended. * * * * * In a nationally televised speech at the U.S. Military Acadamy at West Point, President Barack Hussein Obama announced that he will send another 30,000 American soldiers to Afghanistan. Why is Obama sending so many troops to Central Asia? What is the U.S. military really fighting for in Afghanistan? Why are we still there? Obama's December 1 speech at West Point about the war in Afghanistan presented a "false reading of history" about 9-11. The president's speech on Afghanistan featured a repetition of the fundamental lies about who is really responsible for the terror attacks of 9-11. The 2009 scientific paper on the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center by Dr. Steven E. Jones has exposed these claims to be fabrications and revealed to the world that the Twin Towers were pulverized using an extremely sophisticated and powerful nano-composite explosive. It should be noted that President Obama and his senior staff are fully aware that the U.S. rationale for the invasion of Afghanistan is based on a pack of lies. History will not judge them lightly for such deceit.
Obama repeated the following key lies about 9-11 and Afghanistan during his speech:
Why Afghanistan?By Christopher Bollyn
The discovery of super-Thermite in the dust exposes the government-funded reports as fabrications created to conceal the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. The 9-11 reports produced by the federal agencies FEMA and NIST were written to mislead the public and media about what really happened to the buildings – and the thousands of people trapped within them. This is to say that the U.S. government and controlled media have intentionally deceived the public for eight years. We know that September the 11th, the attacks on New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, were directed from a valley in Afghanistan. We should not have to learn that again. What we are doing is truly protecting the American people by providing for a stable government in Pak… in Afghanistan. About the war in Afghanistan, Wilson repeated the lie he has been telling for years, using the word "truly," as he often does. "This is truly an issue of protecting American families at home by defeating the terrorists overseas," he said.
On 9-11, Ehud Barak, the former Israeli prime/defense minister/military intelligence chief, was the first person to call for the U.S. to attack Afghanistan. Barak told Rupert Murdoch's Sky Television in London that Western governments needed to make a concerted effort to combat terrorism: "Most obviously my guess is a bin Laden organization...We have to stand firm against such terrorism," Barak said.
Maiman was described as "a leading miner" of Central Asian gas fields by the Jerusalem Post in 2004. Given their control of the immense gas resources of Turkmenistan, Maiman, Merhav, and the Mossad would all profit if and when the U.S.-led coalition were able to "pacify" and control Afghanistan so that the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline could be built allowing the gas of Turkmenistan to be sold to energy-hungry India. The TAPI pipeline project would bring billions of dollars into Mossad coffers every year. This is the real reason for the war in Afghanistan and why the Zionist-controlled Obama administration has increased the war effort in Central Asia. It has nothing to do with terrorism or 9-11.
Maiman's network reveals the Mossad-controlled companies linked to 9-11 and the war in Afghanistan. Maiman, for example, is an owner and director of Eltek, Ltd. an Israeli manufacturer of printed circuit boards, along with Eytan Barak. Barak is also a director of ICTS International N.V., the Israeli aviation security company that owns Huntleigh USA, the passenger screening company directly involved with the planes and passenger screening operations on 9-11. Barak is a director of ICTS, a member of the supervisory board, audit committee, and compensation committee. Huntleigh is a key defendant in the 9-11 tort litigation but the Mossad-owned company has been protected by the Zionist Alvin K. Hellerstein, the U.S. District Judge who has prevented any 9-11 trial from finding those responsible for the terror atrocity that changed the world. Finis
"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, and Bradley R. Larsen, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, 7-31 Blau, Uri, and Gidi Weitz, "Ehud Barak Ltd.," Ha'aretz, May 31, 2007
The Shanksville Deception of 9-11
Updated February 4, 2010 Something incredibly ugly happened to Flight 93 over rural Pennsylvania on 9-11. A mass murder atrocity could explain why the public was deceived into thinking that a small crater was the crash site while the bodies of the victims and wreckage were actually being picked up from the real debris field hundreds of meters away in the dark woods. How many victims were there anyway? Two hundred? Why was the wreckage of Flight 93 kept hidden?
The people of Somerset, Pennsylvania, are loyal and patriotic Americans, qualities that have been exploited by the perpetrators of 9-11 to conceal the truth of what happened in the sky over the woods of Shanksville on 9-11. Shanksville is the nearest hamlet to the so-called crash site of United Airlines Flight 93, a small crater in a reclaimed mine between Lambertsville and Shanksville. Having been to the area several times since 9-11, I noticed that many of the people were noticably afraid to talk about the things they had seen and noticed around Shanksville on September 11, 2001. Several of them apologized and told me that they had been told by the F.B.I. or other agents of the U.S. government not to talk. From others I got the clear impression that they had been warned not to talk about what they knew. Then there are those who had obviously been told to tell lies. I would consider Bob Leverknight to be a member of the latter group. As I reported from Somerset: I spoke with Bob Leverknight, correspondent with Somerset's Daily American, at the newspaper's office about how Flight 93 disappeared into the crater without leaving a trace. Leverknight, an active member of the Air National Guard, was assigned by the editor to handle my questions. His answers were quite incredible. About the disappearance of the plane, Leverknight said, "It [the ground] liquefied." One of the plane's massive engines, he said, "bounced" off the ground and was found at a very considerable distance -- in the woods. The ground did not liquefy and swallow the plane as Bob Leverknight told me at the office of the Daily American and nothing bounced off the ground. These are lies that surround the deception of what really happened above Shanksville on 9-11.
THE HIDDEN DEBRIS FIELD The debris of Flight 93 fell in the woods and covered a large area. This is the real debris field and was kept hidden from the view of the public and the press while the bodies and evidence were picked up. The small crater in the reclaimed mine was most likely caused by a missile fired from the Thunderbolt aircraft that was seen circling the area before and after Flight 93 was shot down over the woods.
This crater was made in the middle of the trench to provide a plausible diversion that looked like the scene of a plane crash albeit without any wreckage. The bomb crater was made directly in the middle of the pre-existing trench which indicates that the Shanksville shoot down had been carefully planned in advance. The public was told that the plane had crashed at the site of the crater while the real debris field was located in the woods beginning at a distance of about 100 meters in the woods, around the cottage of Barry Hoover.
The Dayton Daily News of September 12, 2001, described the scene: The impact of the crash left a crater estimated by authorities to be about 10 feet deep and 20 feet wide. It appeared the plane first hit on the downward slope of a hillside and then slid at least 200 yards, scorching a dense area of trees and corn fields. Officials would allow reporters no closer than 300 yards to the scene. From that vantage point, the crater appeared to be barren. Little debris could be seen, and there were no signs of victims. "We haven't seen anything bigger than a phone book, certainly nothing that would resemble a part of a plane," said Capt. Frank Monaco of the Pennsylvania State Police. But one Lambertsville resident, Barry Hoover, who lives a half-mile from the site, said he saw debris scattered at least a mile wide. "There was stuff everywhere back there. It made you want to drop to your knees and cry for those people," Hoover said. PENNSYLVANIA CRASH MAY BE KEY TO TRAGEDY - 'Black box' could give clues to disaster The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette also described the wreckage at the Hoover property: No people on the ground were killed in that crash. But the shock waves set off by the impact of that crash heavily damaged Hoover's home, which lies, literally, a stone's throw from the crater gouged into the earth by the doomed plane. To clarify the location of Barry Hoover's cottage in relation to the crater "crash site" I spoke with Reverend Larry Hoover, a Lutheran minister and father of Barry. Larry Hoover owns the two houses on his property that begins with the treeline at the edge of the reclaimed mine. Barry's cottage is about "one football field" (100 meters) into the woods from the crater, Larry Hoover said. His house is about "three football fields" from the crater, he said. He said that luggage had been found around his house while body parts had been found more around Barry's cottage. The Hoover property is about 7 to 9 acres, he said. The debris was found on property belonging to three people, including the owner of the reclaimed mine. Rev. Hoover said that he noticed that the garage door of Barry's house had been blown inside out and backwards, something he thought quite remarkable. I wanted to know why the existence of the real debris field deep in the woods had been kept hidden so I asked Reverend Hoover, "Why have you been quiet about what happened on your property on 9-11?" "We tried to cooperate," he said. I knew what he meant without pressing the point. The FBI agents had given similar orders all over Shanksville and Somerset County. The Hoovers had been asked not to talk about what had happened on 9-11. The public was told that the plane had crashed into the reclaimed mine while the real debris field was cleaned up in complete secrecy in the woods around the Hoover cabins. Why has the real debris field been kept secret? There can only be one explanation: the truth about what happened to Flight 93 could not be revealed to the public. The evidence indicates that Flight 93 was shot out of the sky with a blast that sounded like "an atomic bomb," as one witness told me: Nena Lensbouer, who had prepared lunch for the workers at the scrap yard overlooking the crash site, said she was the first person to reach the crater. Lensbouer said that the crater was five to six feet deep and smaller than the 24-foot trailer in her front yard. She described the sound as "an explosion, like an atomic bomb" -- not a crash. If Flight 93 was shot down with such precision, and the truth concealed with an elaborate deception, there are several crucial questions I would ask: Exactly how many people were on Flight 93? Did Flight 93 really land in Cleveland on 9-11 and were passengers from other flights put onto the flight before it was shot down? Is this what really happened to the passengers of Flights 11 and 175? Why was Wally Miller, the Somerset County Coroner, forced to turn over the "crash" site to the FBI? Why did he abdicate his responsibility for the site and the recovery of the bodies, his obligation under state law? Why was he not even allowed to be involved in the identification of the remains of the passengers of Flight 93, whose death certificates he duly signed? The evidence certainly indicates that something extremely ugly happened over Shanksville on 9-11 and the evidence of the atrocity was strewn about the woods surrounding the Hoover property. There was only one small survivor from the catastrophe that occurred at Barry Hoover's cottage on 9-11. Woody, Barry Hoover's cat, survived and is still living, eight years later. In 2005, I interviewed Viola Saylor of Lambertsville who had seen an aircraft that looked like an A-10 Thunderbolt over Shanksville on 9-11. The following eyewitness accounts of seeing a Thunderbolt are from my article of July 15, 2005, “Eyewitnesses Saw Military Aircraft at Scene of Flight 93”.
Susan Mcelwain, a local teacher, also reported seeing a white "military" plane at the scene of the crash before witnessing an explosion. Mcelwain told the Daily Mirror (U.K.) what she saw: It came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50 feet above my mini-van," she recalled. "It was so low I ducked instinctively. It was traveling real fast, but hardly made any sound. Then it disappeared behind some trees. A few seconds later I heard this great explosion and saw this fireball rise up over the trees, so I figured the jet had crashed. The ground really shook. So I dialed 911 and told them what happened. I'd heard nothing about the other attacks and it was only when I got home and saw the TV that I realized it wasn't the white jet, but Flight 93. I didn't think much more about it until the authorities started to say there had been no other plane. The plane I saw was heading right to the point where Flight 93 crashed and must have been there at the very moment it came down. There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look. The plane Mcelwain describes sounds like the Warthog seen by Saylor over Lambertsville. "It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side," Mcelwain said. "I haven't found one like it on the Internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around. Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3,000 feet up. But I saw it and it was there before the crash and it was 40 feet above my head. They did not want my story - nobody here did." Sources and Recommended Reading: Bollyn, Christopher, "The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93", May 12, 2006
Who Was Behind Blocking Bollyn on RBN?
February 7, 2010 When I awoke at 4:45am Tuesday morning to listen to Christopher on Republic Broadcasting Network (Fresno, California time), I too saw the "This Account has been Suspended" notice on the RBN website. I called the 800 number for them and the lady was kind enough to give me a phone number with an access code…
The Axelrod Factor: Why Obama Fails to Deliver
Updated February 3, 2010 After one year in office, President Barack Obama has failed to deliver on any of his key campaign promises. Public opinion of the Obama White House has clearly changed. Obama has only succeeded in protecting the outrageous 9-11 deception, wasting billions of dollars in bailing out Maurice Greenberg's criminal enterprise A.I.G. and the corrupt investment banks he insured, and increasing the killing and suffering in the Middle East and Central Asia. To understand why Obama seems unable to deliver we need to know much more about his Senior Advisor David Axelrod -- the man who made Obama president.
"Who is Barack Obama?" Bob Herbert of the New York Times asks, "Americans are still looking for the answer, and if they don’t get it soon — or if they don’t like the answer — the president’s current political problems will look like a walk in the park." "Mr. Obama promised during the campaign that he would be a different kind of president, one who would preside over a more open, more high-minded administration that would be far more in touch with the economic needs of ordinary working Americans. But no sooner was he elected than he put together an economic team that would protect, above all, the interests of Wall Street, the pharmaceutical industry, the health insurance companies, and so on," Herbert wrote in his editorial of January 25 entitled, "A Credibility Gap."
"Americans want to know what he stands for, where his line in the sand is, what he’ll really fight for, and where he wants to lead this nation," Herbert concluded. "They want to know who their president really is." THE AXELROD PRESIDENCY It is safe to say that the U.S. government today is a far cry from what the framers of the Constitution intended. Congress has lost its control over our currency and completely abdicated its role as the only branch that can declare war. These powers now belong to the president, directly or indirectly. The executive branch has gained immense power at the expense of the legislative branch, our representatives in Congress. The result is that our presidents have much more power than envisioned by the Founding Fathers. The real power of the U.S. government is centralized in the person of the president, who has more power than a king or czar. To control the United States one need only control the president. The president is controlled by the people around him, his chief of staff and senior advisors. This is why it is essential to understand who advises the president because these are the people who shape the policies of the White House. To understand the Obama presidency one needs to know the people who made Barack Obama president. Chief among the people behind the Obama presidency is David Axelrod, Obama's friend, senior advisor, and chief media and political strategist. If one were to look behind the televised images of Barack Obama, one would find David Axelrod writing the speeches and creating the image of the candidate and the president. While Barack Obama is the face of the current administration, the policies, words, and images are creations of David Axelrod. So overwhelming is his influence on the White House that it would be fair to call this the Axelrod Presidency.
WHO IS DAVID AXELROD? The most peculiar thing about David Axelrod is that although he is clearly one of the most powerful men in the government of the United States, for most Americans he remains an unknown factor. The controlled media does nothing to help us understand who Axelrod is. How can that be? How is it that Axelrod represents the executive branch of the U.S. government on television and speaks to the media daily about the policies of the U.S. government and nobody cares to explain who this person is and how he became senior advisor to President Obama? Who is this senior political advisor to the president who said, quite incorrectly, in June 2009 that Iran had nuclear weapons - on national television? Who is Axelrod to say that Iran will face consequences for failing to submit to the extra-judicial dictates of the so-called "international community," as he did at the end of 2009? David Axelrod is a Chicago-based media consultant, advertising man, and corporate lobbyist who makes his living by changing public opinion to support his clients, who are primarily political candidates and major corporations. Axelrod is really a paid lobbyist who uses television advertising to change public opinion on behalf of his clients. Because he has two kinds of clients – political candidates and large corporations - Axelrod started two media companies: AKP&D Message and Media for politicians, and ASK Public Strategies for corporations. While all partners at AKP&D (A is for Axelrod, with John Kupper, David Plouffe, and John Del Cecato) held senior positions on the Obama campaign, it wasn't the only campaign AKP&D worked on. AKP&D also provided services to the presidential campaigns of John Edwards and Hillary Clinton. Creating a positive image to affect public opinion through television ads is one of the basic services Axelrod provides. To do this he writes most of their speeches. Because he has so many politicians as clients, sometimes he re-uses the same speech. When Obama the candidate used the same speech that Deval Patrick or John Edwards had used earlier, it wasn't plagerism – it was simply Obama reading a recycled Axelrod speech.
David Axelrod is described on the White House website as the former "Senior Partner" at AKP&D, who "managed media strategy and communications for more than 150 local, state, and national campaigns, with a focus on progressive candidates and causes." SourceWatch has information about David Axelrod and his media companies. As a former resident of Cook County who was born and raised in the Chicago area, I can say that the people who Axelrod has helped put into office in Illinois and Chicago are anything but "progressive." Having monitored elections in Cook County, I can say with a high degree of certainty that the Chicago-based political figures that Axelrod has worked with are actually part of a large criminal enterprise. Why would David Axelrod be involved in promoting candidates who are so easily corrupted? Why is a son of Romanian Jewish immigrants working to promote black candidates in cities and states across the country? Who tells Axelrod who to support and what policies to promote? ATTACK DOGS OF ZIONIST TERRORISTS
David Axelrod works very closely with Rahm Emanuel, President Obama's Chief of Staff. Axelrod and Emanuel are the highest level Zionist agents/controllers of the Obama administration. Rahm Emanuel is named after an Israeli terrorist from the Stern Gang and is the son of Benjamin (Auerbach) Emanuel, a former member of the Irgun, the Zionist terrorist organization headed by Menachem Begin. The Irgun was behind the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946, the worst terrorist bombing in Palestinian history.
While still in their twenties, Axelrod and Emanuel began working together to defeat Senator Charles H. Percy (R-Ill.) in 1984. Percy was a popular senator who had served three terms and risen to become the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Senator Percy had become a powerful adversary of Menachem Begin, the former terrorist leader who had become prime minister of Israel. Begin saw Percy as an enemy in the U.S. Congress because Percy was openly critical of illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories and advised Israel to compromise with the Palestinians. Percy had also criticized Israel's brutal siege of West Beirut during the summer of 1982, saying, "It could turn out to be, if it continues this way, Israel's Vietnam."
When Begin read a report Percy had called for economic measures to be taken to stop Israel's murderous invasion of Lebanon, Begin fired back. "I would like to tell Senator Percy that nobody, nobody is going to bring Israel to her knees. You must have forgotten that Jews do not kneel but to God," an angry Begin told Jewish fund-raisers in Jerusalem. Philip M. Klutznick of Chicago, the former president of B'nai B'rith International and the World Jewish Congress, who had corresponded with both Percy and Prime Minister Begin, was a key Jewish fund-raiser who conspired with Begin and took action to remove Senator Percy from office. Begin wanted Percy removed from his position of power in the U.S. Congress and Klutznick made it happen. When Axelrod and Emanuel went to work for the Paul Simon senate campaign (1984) they were taking orders from Klutznick and working as the political attack dogs for Menachem Begin, one of the most notorious terrorists of history. Axelrod was later commissioned in 1992 by Klutznick to make Barack Obama "our first black president," as his daughter Betty Lu Saltzman said. David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel are clearly not working for America's best interest in the Obama White House. They are the highest-level point men in the White House for an international network of Zionist criminals. The candidates that Axelrod promotes are not progressive. They are controlled. The Zionist strategy in promoting candidates who can be controlled is what I call "Control through Corruption." THE 9-11 CONNECTION One of Axelrod's clients was Michael R. White, who was mayor of Cleveland from 1990 to 2002. Mayor White played a key role in the actions that took place at the Cleveland airport on 9-11, when it was reported that Flight 93 and another plane had made emergency landings and that the passengers had been taken into the NASA facility at the airport where they had been interviewed by FBI agents.
Mayor White headed what is described as the most corrupt administration in Cleveland history. Nate Gray, who is currently in prison, was White's "bagman," and collected bribes for contracts. During a court hearing in September 2008, U.S District Judge James Gwin said Gray still refused to testify "to protect some compatriot."
As I wrote in "The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93" in 2006: On August 17, 2005, White's business associate and close friend, Nate Gray, was convicted of 36 criminal counts relating to bribery of public officials in four cities. Two days after the Gray conviction, Brent Larkin, in an editorial in the Cleveland Plain Dealer, wrote: "Now we know that, at the very least, White presided over a government that will forever be remembered as one of the most corrupt in the city's history."
When David Axelrod worked his television magic to get Michael White elected mayor, he was really working for Sam Miller. Miller then used White to serve his purposes. Under Mayor White, Sam Miller's taxes for the property he owned (with the Ratner family of Forest City) in Cleveland fell every year to the point where he was paying very little tax. When White took office in 1990, he cut Miller's property tax by 21 percent. In 1991, Miller's taxes fell another 20 percent. In 1992 his taxes fell another 17.3 percent and in 1994 by 12.4 percent - for a tax cut of 71 percent in four years. During the first four years of White's administration, Miller's assessed property value was lowered by $160 million, saving him and Forest City $56 million. This savings for Miller and Forest City lowered revenues for Cleveland schools and libraries. Axelrod also worked on something called the Gateway Committee (Cleveland Downtown Redevelopment Program), which was a project that the Miller family was very much involved in. David Axelrod is a highest-level Zionist agent controlling the president of the United States. Here he discusses candidate Obama's visit to Israel as he speaks from the King David Hotel. This was the hotel that was bombed by Rahm Emanuel's father and his gang in 1946 killing more than 90 people.
to be continued... Sources and Recommended Reading: Bollyn, Christopher, "The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93", May 12, 2006 "Obama’s Credibility Gap" by Bob Herbert, New York Times, January 25, 2010 Bartimole, Roldo, "How Hypocritical Can Sam Miller Get Before We Laugh Him Out of Town", Cleveland Leader, June 26, 2009
Note of Clarification & Portraits of the Fallen
January 26, 2010 This is a note to let my readers know that I am certainly not in Chicago or the United States as some rumors suggest. I have not been held or kidnapped by anyone at anytime nor have I flown anywhere since June 2007. They have taken all the fun out of flying so I prefer to travel by train and ship (and bicycle whenever possible). I am planning to organize my website to make it more user friendly and hope to get my book (currently available only online), Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, published this year. I also hope I can arrange an event in the near future about "Understanding and Surviving the War on Terror," which could be done on video for viewing as a podcast. It would be a great way to respond to some questions from readers and callers. A reader from India, for example, wrote to me about my recent comments about having met then U.S. Representative Leon E. Panetta when he was a congressman from the Monterey Bay area. I met Mr. Panetta briefly when he participated in events at the University of California at Santa Cruz about the Middle East. I was studying history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the time and engaged him in the political questions surrounding this problem. The fact that I have met Mr. Panetta does not mean that I support him or his politics.
Leon Panetta is the current director of the C.I.A. and was Bill Clinton's chief of staff. I am of the opinion that C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan and Afghanistan using Hellfire missiles launched from un-manned drones are, in fact, state-sponsored terrorism. Bombing civilians in a nation that the U.S. is not at war with is terrorism. Panetta, as the director of the C.I.A., is directly responsible for this state-sponsored terrorism, which would make him a terrorist. Finally, I highly recommend viewing the short video piece, an audio slideshow, made by the BBC entitled "Portraits of the fallen". This very short slideshow gives the viewer a very personal view of the tragic loss of life suffered by American, Canadian, and British families who have lost loved ones in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Every soldier who is killed or wounded in these horrendous wars has a family that is devastated by their loss. This remarkable slideshow can be viewed here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/8471873.stm
Corporatism vs. Democracy in America
January 23, 2010 "In a day when special interests already hold our democracy by the throat, the court has helped them tighten their grip...The hypocrisy here is striking. And the impact of this ruling is frightening." - "Reckless Supreme Court Ruling on Campaign Finance: Special Interests Win, We Lose" Star Ledger Editorial Board (NJ), January 22, 2010 The Supreme Court has handed lobbyists a new weapon. A lobbyist can now tell any elected official: if you vote wrong, my company, labor union or interest group will spend unlimited sums explicitly advertising against your re-election. - David D. Kirkpatrick, New York Times, January 21, 2010 "The Court's ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions around the Nation. The path it has taken to reach its outcome will, I fear, do damage to this institution." - Justice John Paul Stevens in his 90-page dissenting opinion "The conceit that corporations must be treated identically to natural persons in the political sphere is not only inaccurate but also inadequate to justify the Court's disposition of this case. In the context of election to public office, the distinction between corporate and human speakers is significant. Although they make enormous contributions to our society, corporations are not actually members of it. The cannot vote or run for office. Because they may be managed and controlled by nonresidents, their interests may conflict in fundamental respects with the interests of eligible voters. The financial resources, legal structure, and instrumental orientation of corporations raise legitimate concerns about their role in the electoral process. Our lawmakers have a compelling constitutional basis, if not also a democratic duty, to take measures designed to guard against the potentially deleterious effects of corporate spending in local and national races... The Court operates with a sledge hammer rather than a scalpel when it strikes down one of Congress' most significant efforts to regulate the role that corporations and unions play in electoral politics." The Supreme Court decision allowing corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money on political advertising is the death knell for democracy* in America. If voting machines killed the democratic franchise in the United States, this decision by the Supreme Court is a dump truck dumping tons of dirt on its grave. This is the legal acceptance of what can only be called the rule of corporatism in America. American voters do not generally elect their presidents and representatives based not on their real merits or political skills but mainly on the image of the candidate received through television advertising and televised debates, which are controlled by the two major political parties. President Obama (my former senator who failed to respond to my letters) was not elected on his proven merits or political achievements (which are very scanty) but on a carefully crafted image of the candidate created by corporate lobbyist David Axelrod, his senior media strategist and political advisor. This ruling gives corporations an even bigger voice than they already have in politics by allowing them to run televised political ads before an election. This is a extremely flawed interpretation of the freedom of speech and cannot be allowed to stand if the United States is to retain any semblance of being a democratic republic. "Joined by the other three members of the court's liberal wing, Justice Stevens said the majority had committed a grave error in treating corporate speech the same as that of human beings." Corporations are not individuals or citizens. They are super-sized entities that are international in scope and size. Many of them are not beholden to any nation. Corporations simply cannot be equated with citizens as they do not belong to any nation. Corporations are concerned with gaining power and wealth and have core interests that are clearly contrary to the national good or public interest. With this ruling corporations will be able to use their general funds to play a super-size role in any political contest in the nation. How can any candidate of the people compete against someone who has the backing of a huge corporation with a war chest of millions of dollars to spend on advertising and television ads? Corporations have business interests in every congressional district in the nation. This ruling will enable them to exercise a massive influence in every congressional race. “If the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech.” Corporations can not be granted the same rights as those enshrined in the First Amendment for citizens of the United States. To rule that corporations have the right of free speech in federal elections and then allow them to spend freely from their immense financial resources on political campaigns at every level across the United States is a most absurd interpretation of the Constitutional right of Freedom of Speech. Justice Kennedy's statement above does not take into account that churches are "associations of citizens" that are fined (taxed) for engaging in political speech. Churches in the United States do not have the right to political speech. Why should corporations, which are often foreign-owned and controlled, be allowed to have the loudest voice in U.S. elections while churches are forced to be silent? This decision destroys the notion that America is a government "of the people, by the people, for the people." * The term democracy should not be taken to mean that the United States is a "democracy" in the literal or classical Greek meaning of the word. Switzerland is a democracy in the real meaning of the word. The Swiss citizenry is truly involved in making political decisions for the nation. The United States was created as a republic with democratic elections in which representatives are chosen. The right to choose political representatives through open and transparent elections is the "democratic franchise", something which has completely disappeared in most counties of the United States with the use of computerized electronic voting systems. Recommended Reading: Hasen, Richard L., “Money Grubbers - The Supreme Court kills campaign finance reform”, January 21, 2010
Two Decades of Genocide in Iraq
January 20, 2010 The American and British populations are comfortably cushioned from reality by the controlled media which censors news and images of the horrendous humanitarian catastrophe that has befallen the Iraqi people as a result of the Anglo-American war of aggression against the oil-rich nation, a military crusade now in its 20th year. (The recent Dutch judicial report from The Hague on the legal questions surrounding the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq in 2003 indicates that the war in Iraq can be legally defined as a "War of Aggression", which is a "Crime Against the Peace" under the Nuremberg Charter.)  The Anglo-American war against Iraq, which began on January 17, 1991, is now entering its 20th year. The British have been trying to occupy Iraq for more than one hundred years. Denis Halliday, the former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations and Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq (1997-98) explains the true nature of the military campaign against the people of Iraq. As Halliday writes, he was compelled to resign from his position on moral grounds. To participate in the UN program that had imposed "genocidal sanctions on the innocent of Iraq" would have "implied my complicity in human catastrophe," Halliday wrote. In the same newsletter, I also recommend reading the comments of Abdul Ilah Albayaty: Instead of ending the occupation, handing Iraq to its people and punishing those responsible for this tragedy, instead of listening to the Iraqi people’s rights and demands, the Obama administration adopted the same strategy as Bush: trying to create a client state in Iraq by depending on the same corrupted backward forces that supported the occupation against the Iraqi people. The only difference is that it tries to change the faces of its puppet government. The plunder, the corruption, the repression and the attempts to divide Iraq continue as before. Following one year of the Obama administration no change has taken place, despite the declarations and promises.  Why have the wars in the Middle East continued and increased under President Obama? One year ago, Obama appointed Richard Holbrooke, Henry Kissinger's right-hand man and partner-in-crime, to run the "War on Terror" as his envoy in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The killing of innocent civilians has increased greatly under Holbrooke. Kissinger is a key player in the Zionist shadow government behind the Obama administration. Note the expression on Obama's face.  Kissinger and Holbrooke gave "The Kissinger Prize" to George H.W. Bush at the American Academy in Berlin, which they run together. The elder Bush started the war in Iraq in 1991 and was the first president to use the expression "New World Order." * * * 900 Iraqi Prisoners Face Summary Execution: Stop the Death Penalty in Iraq! Accepting the Gandhi International Peace Award in 2003, I explained my resignation from the United Nations as head of the UN Humanitarian Programme in Iraq at end 1998. I indicated that resignation was necessary because of my refusal to accept Security Council orders that continued to impose genocidal sanctions on the innocent of Iraq. My continuation would have implied my complicity in human catastrophe. And, in addition, my innate sense of justice was outraged — as yours would have been in my position — by the violence that UN sanctions had brought upon the lives and wellbeing of children, families, and the many loved ones of Iraq. There can be no justification for killing the young, the aged, the sick, the rich, the poor anywhere, under any circumstances, least of all by the United Nations. Some will tell you that the Iraqi leadership was punishing the Iraqi people. That was not my perception or experience when living in Baghdad in 1997-98 and traveling throughout the country. And were that to be the case, how could that possibly justify collective punishment — that is sanctions, by the United Nations? The UN Charter and international law have no provision for the murderous consequences of a UN embargo, over 12 long years in the case of the people of Iraq. After leaving, sometimes I explained the impact of sanctions to the media, and to university and public meetings by describing Iraqi children as being on death row without hope of reprieve. By the end of 1998, we — the UN — had killed hundreds of thousands without any apparent hesitation on the part of the permanent member states of the Security Council. The illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003 has only worsened the overall situation for Iraqi children, women and men. Contrary to what the mainstream media has been and is reporting, a whole nation is being terrorized, killed, driven into exile. The humanitarian situation in Iraq is catastrophic according to the ICRC (The Red Cross) and other international organizations. American imposition of “democracy and freedom” has failed as law, order and economic and social wellbeing is increasingly elusive. Health and educational systems are about to collapse; the human rights situation is disastrous; human security and opportunities have vanished; the fearful, the refugees and the displaced outnumber those enjoying normal lives. Since the Iraqi government reintroduced capital punishment in 2004, an unknown number of people have been hanged. None of the condemned appears to have had a fair trial. Sadly, the Iraqi judicial system has been deemed by responsible international agencies and human rights organizations to be corrupt, dysfunctional and plagued by sectarianism. And now the Presidential Council of Iraq has reportedly ratified the death sentences of some 900 detainees languishing on death row. Some 17 of them are confirmed to be women. The apparent collapse of justice in Iraq today needs to be seen in the context of an almost total breakdown of law and order since the US/UK invasion, including the war crimes, atrocities, killing of civilians by invading and occupying US mercenaries and military forces. I oppose the use of the death penalty wherever it occurs on the grounds that it is contrary to fundamental human rights. The international community that has already totally failed the Iraqi people has a compelling obligation to condemn the appalling human consequences of illegal invasion and occupation, and condemn — surely the Iraqis have suffered enough — one of the highest rates of execution in the world. Without your voice the deadly increasing spiral of killing will continue. That’s why I join the BRussells Tribunal in denouncing executions. I would very much appreciate it if you would read the following statement against the imminent hanging of 900 detainees: http://brusselstribunal.org/DeathPenalty121209.htm and sign the call to stop these executions and request that the Iraqi government impose a moratorium on the death penalty. Thank you on behalf of the BRussells Tribunal and all of us who care about justice and human life. Denis J. Halliday Former UN assistant secretary general and UN humanitarian coordinator for Iraq, 1997-98 Recipient of the 2003 Gandhi International Peace Award — Ireland
Beware of Webster Tarpley's Disinformation
January 20, 2010 A reader sent me a link to a YouTube video of Webster Tarpley being interviewed on Russia Today (RT) television on December 29 about the false-flag "attempted terror" attack that occurred on Christmas Day on Delta's Northwest Airlines Flight 253 from Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport to Detroit. The video is interesting because it shows how Tarpley lies to protect Israel and the Mossad by putting the blame for the attempted bombing on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which is currently headed by Leon E. Panetta, a man I have met on several occasions when he was my Congressman for the Monterey Bay area of California.
I happen to know something about Webster Tarpley, having been part of the same four-man panel during Jimmy Walter's 9-11 Truth Tour in Europe in the summer of 2005. During the tour Tarpley put the blame for 9-11 on a nebulous group that he never actually identified but one would infer was tied to NATO and the CIA. Tarpley, like all the other panelists on the tour, never mentioned any Israeli or Zionist role in 9-11. My speech, on the other hand, focused on the real evidence that 9-11 was an Israeli false-flag terror atrocity designed to start the "War on Terror" and change the face of America. Finally, in Rome, in the presence of journalist Maurizio Blondet and others, I asked Mr. Tarpley why he insisted on blaming nebulous U.S. entities, without providing any evidence, while avoiding the real evidence of Israeli/Mossad involvement in the terror attacks of 9-11?
In the RT video about Al Qaida in Yemen, Mr. Tarpley provides the same faulty logic and avoids any mention of Israeli intelligence, which has carried out large-scale operations in Yemen since 1949. Here are the relevant quotes from Tarpley on RT television: "Al Qaida, of course, is functioning, as always, as the CIA Arab-Islamic legion." "Al Qaida in the Arab Peninsula is a creation wholly of the U.S. intelligence agencies." [The Christmas bomber Abdul Mutallab] is a "protected patsy", according to Tarpley, "an asset controlled by U.S. intelligence." Webster Tarpley and his wife, the former Leah J. Peltier, live in the Washington, D.C. area. Leah is 17 years younger that Webster and only obtained a college degree in 2009. She has been with Tarpley since his days with the Lyndon LaRouche movement in the early 1990s. Her lack of real estate expertise or education notwithstanding, Leah is the Executive Vice President of Operations at the Washington D.C. office for the privately-owned Cresa Partners LLC, where she has worked only since 2007. Leah Tarpley works under Gene S. Sachs, a "managing principal" and member of the board of directors of the Boston-based company. Leah is not the only Tarpley working for Mr. Sachs. Chloe Tarpley is also listed as an administrator in his firm. Chloe, who has only worked for Cresa Partners since May of 2008, is Webster Tarpley's daughter.
It is interesting to note that the Tarpley women work for the preferred agent of one of the world's largest defense contractors. Mr. Sachs' biggest client is BAE Systems North America. Sachs has completed more than 275 assignments for BAE in twenty states of the United States in the past five years. BAE Systems is the world's third largest defense contractor and Britain's leading aerospace/defense company. In the company's own words: BAE Systems Inc. is the U.S. subsidiary of BAE Systems plc, an international company engaged in the development, delivery and support of advanced defense and aerospace systems in the air, on land, at sea and in space. Headquartered in Rockville, Maryland, BAE Systems, Inc. employs some 45,000 employees in the US, UK, Sweden, Israel and South Africa generating annual sales in excess of $10 billion. BAE Systems Inc. consists of three operating groups that provide support and service solutions for current and future defense, intelligence, and civilian systems; design, develop and manufacture a wide range of electronic systems and subsystems for both military and commercial applications; and design, develop, produce, and provide service support of armored combat vehicles, artillery systems and intelligent munitions.
Sachs has been the preferred real estate provider for BAE Systems NA since 2000 and manages some 18.5 million square feet of property for the sprawling British defense contractor. He is also the Treasurer of CresaPartners in Washington, according to Hoover's, so with two members of the Tarpley family working in his office, we can see that Mr. Sachs has a significant influence over the income flow for the Tarpley household.
If Mr. Tarpley has any solid evidence that Al Qaida in Yemen is, in fact, "a creation wholly of U.S. intelligence agencies" he should bring this information to the attention of the U.S. government and Leon E. Panetta, the Director of the CIA. Mr. Tarpley should explain who controls Al Qaida in Yemen, which he says is "functioning, as always, as the CIA Arab-Islamic legion." Pray tell Mr. Tarpley, which part of the CIA is running Al Qaida in Yemen? Is it under the direction of Mr. Panetta or is it a rogue outfit of the agency? Mr. Tarpley should be asked if the CIA was running Al Qaida in Yemen when the USS Cole was bombed in 2000, an attack that killed 17 sailors and wounded 39 others. Perhaps Mr. Tarpley can explain the logic of why the CIA would attack a U.S. Navy ship in Yemen.
Tarpley mentions that the Christmas bomber Abdul Mutallab flew through Amsterdam but he doesn't mention the conspicuous fact that security for both Schiphol Airport and Delta Airlines is provided by the Mossad-run company, International Consultants on Targeted Security -- the same company that provided passenger screening services at the crucial airports on 9-11. So who is Webster Tarpley really serving with his disinformation?
to be continued...
Activists Expose Michael Goff's Role in 9-11
January 18, 2010 A group of active citizens led by Anthony Hmura of Worcester, Massachusetts, are working to bring Michael Goff's key role in the creation of PTECH (a "Trojan Horse" software company - created by Israeli military intelligence and suspected of being involved in the hijacking of critical U.S. computer systems on 9-11*) to the attention of the public and local law enforcement. Michael Goff is also from Worcester.
* Read more about Michael Goff and Ptech's role in hijacking FAA and other U.S. computer systems on 9-11 here: Bollyn, Christopher, “How Did Spy Software Get Onto FAA Computers?” Goff, Michael, "About Us" - Goff Communications, April 2005 Goff, Michael, "Clients" - Goff Communications, April 2005
Dear Christopher, Now, a new dimension has been added to this opportunity! Within days of the AZL's online efforts to inform Worcesterites of evidence suggesting that Worcester-born Michael S. Goff is a likely 9/11 Terrorist, a "sudden rash of anti-Semitic graffiti" cropped up in Worcester. Very suspect. In this context, the AZL has made Worcester Police Chief Gemme aware of the "impeccable and very suspect timing of this graffiti", in addition to the small detail that State Representative Harriette Chandler, who is pushing for legislation in response to this grafitti (which may well be a "hate hoax"), is married to Michael Goff's former employer - Burton Chandler of Seder & Chandler law firm). We would greatly appreciate if you would post a link to this "Open Letter to Worcester's Police Chief Gary Gemme", concerning Michael Goff, who worked at the 911-connected software company PTECH. This post, which contains a link for the AZL's "Open Letter to Worcester Mayor O'Brien, " provides information on Michael Goff's local connections and the context, which is essential to any investigation of Michael Goff and PTECH: http://anthonyhmura.blogspot.com/2010/01/open-letter-to-worcester-police-chief_05.html Direct link to 'Michael Goff's local context' is here: http://anthonyhmura.blogspot.com/2009/12/michael-goff-in-context-bnai-brith-jews.html AZL Roundtable discussion (with Jim Condit) on possible graffiti hate hoax: Any activists, webmasters and forum members who see the value in honing in on this opportunity to expose Goff (and his potential Worcester connections, who may well have just pulled a hate hoax to protect Goff from AZL’s exposure) contact Anthony Hmura at: <polishflyer7@yahoo.com> or by U.S.P.S. mail to 37 Canterbury St., Worcester, MA 01610 Thanks for your great research all of these years, Christopher, and if this is not an opportunity for the world-wide opposition to 9/11's Zionist crime network, then nothing is. Opportunities like this are not likely to come to us ever again. Given the fact that your work has so helped make this opportunity possible, Christopher Bollyn: hats off to you! The Anti-Zionist League (TheAZL.com) Worcester, Massachusetts
Cockpit Door of AA77 Never Opened: Pilots for 9-11 Truth
January 14, 2010
Pilots for 9/11 Truth Forum has posted an examination of the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) supposedly from the Pentagon wreckage of American Airlines Flight 77 that suggests that the cockpit door was never opened during the flight. This discovery appears to be yet another piece of evidence disproving the official story about what happened at the Pentagon on 9-11. The data from the FDR comes from Warren Stutt’s website at: http://www.warrenstutt.com/AAL77FDRDecoder/index.html Here is the key paragraph of the posting from the Pilots for 9/11 Truth Forum by Rob Balsamo: On the morning of September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77 departed Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles at 8:20 am Eastern Time. According to reports and data, a hijacking took place between 08:50:54 and 08:54:11 in which the hijackers allegedly crashed the aircraft into the Pentagon at 09:37:45. Reported by CNN, according to Ted Olson, wife Barbara Olson had called him from the reported flight stating, "...all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers...". However, according to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if the Flight Deck Door remained closed? Source: Balsamo, Rob, "9/11: Pentagon Aircraft Hijack Impossible, Flight Deck Door Closed for Entire Flight", Pilots for 9/11 Truth Forum, November 27, 2009 Sheila Casey of the Rock Creek Free Press (Washington, D.C.) wrote an article entitled “Flight 77 Cockpit Door Never Opened During 9/11 ‘Hijack’” dated December 15, 2009, that lays out the FDR data problem very clearly: Pilots for 9/11 Truth has reported that the data stream from the flight data recorder (FDR) for American Airlines flight 77, which allegedly struck the Pentagon on 9/11, shows that the cockpit door never opened during the entire 90 minute flight. The data was provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which has refused to comment… The official story about flight 77 is that five Muslim terrorists brandishing box cutters forced their way into the cockpit and herded two pilots, four flight attendants and all the passengers to the back of the plane. This story came into being via Ted Olson, US Solicitor General, who told CNN — that he received two phone calls from his wife Barbara Olson, a passenger on the doomed flight. Ted Olson’s story changed several times. Sometimes he claimed that the calls from his wife were made from seat back phones, other times that she used her cell phone…. It was the FBI that revealed the evidence that decisively disproves Ted Olson’s story. In the Zacarias Moussaoui trial in 2006, the FBI presented a report on the cell phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. Their report on AA77 shows that there was only one phone call from Barbara Olson, but that it was an unconnected call lasting zero seconds. So Ted Olson either lied about receiving calls from his wife or was deceived into believing he received calls from her…. This new evidence, showing that the cockpit door never opened during flight, is another nail in the coffin of the official story about flight 77. Clearly, if the cockpit door never opened, then hijackers did not storm the cockpit and herd the pilots to the back of the plane. The data, which originated from the government, does not support the government’s story. Source: Casey, Sheila, "Flight 77 Cockpit Door Never Opened During 9/11 ‘Hijack’", Rock Creek Free Press, Washington, D.C., December 15, 2009
Mapping the 9-11 Terror Network
February 8, 2010 I have added three improved schematic diagrams to a special section at the end of the chapter entitled "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11." These diagrams were sent to me by a reader and supporter in Massachusetts and are quite similar to the large diagram that I made as I wrote this chapter of my on-line book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.
The diagrams can be seen by clicking on the following links: Ptech and Computer Network
The Christmas Bomber and the Fraudulent War on Terror
January 11, 2010
The Christmas Bomber and the Fraudulent War on Terror by Christopher Bollyn In Washington, President Obama is under pressure to take action. The Christmas Day attempted attack over Detroit may have failed, but it brought back instant memories of 9/11. Military action will continue. On 18 November 2009 I published a warning in which I said there was a "very high" risk of a false-flag "Al Qaida" terror attack against Americans. The warning was the thrust of my article, entitled “Terror Risk High as Obama Ponders Afghan Fiasco,” which begins with this sentence: "The risk of another false-flag terror attack like the terror atrocities of 9-11 is currently very high." (A "false-flag" terror incident is one that is designed to affect public opinion by being blamed on a third party by the real perpetrators.) On Christmas Day, thirty-seven days after my article was published on Bollyn.com, the false-flag terror incident I predicted occurred on a passenger airliner approaching Detroit's Metro Airport.
My November 18 warning of a false-flag terror attack was the first I have ever issued based on my own understanding of the political situation at hand. I decided to publish the warning because I was absolutely convinced that the Zionist planners behind the fraudulent "War on Terror" desperately needed a high-profile terrorist incident involving Americans to gain public and political support to legitimize the actions the Obama administration has taken to advance the Zionist war on Islam. As President Barack Obama called for a massive troop surge in Afghanistan there was clearly an urgent need to validate his ill-advised policies to increase U.S. force levels in the disastrous and costly eight-year-old war - a war of aggression which lacks any validity. Since terrorism is the primary tool and tactic in the Zionist construct known as the "War on Terror" it seemed quite logical that a false-flag terror event involving "al Qaida" was imminent, so I published the warning.
The “failed al-Qaida bombing attempt” on Christmas Day in Detroit, on the other hand, is exactly the kind of false-flag terror attack I meant in my warning, although I hadn't anticipated the possibility of an "intentional dud," which this incident evidently was. Readers of Bollyn.com know that this was the first and only time I have published a false-flag terror warning based on my own understanding of the logic and players in the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror." The risk of another false-flag terror attack like the terror atrocities of 9-11 is currently very high…An Israeli-designed terror attack that is seen by the public as having been committed by Al Qaida would serve as an effective decision maker for Obama and swing public opinion behind sending more troops to the eight-year-old war of occupation in Afghanistan. This is why I consider the chances of another terror attack to be blamed on Al Qaida to be very high at the moment. The Christmas Day attack of the so-called Underwear Bomber on Delta’s Northwest Airlines Flight 253 is Mossad's idea of a joke but it is certainly meant to be taken with all seriousness by the Zionist-controlled media and corrupt politicians who make policy decisions based on such events. Jeremy Bowen, Middle East Editor for the BBC, distilled the propaganda message of the Christmas Day bomber down to its simplest form for public consumption on January 5: In Washington, President Obama is under pressure to take action. The Christmas Day attempted attack over Detroit may have failed, but it brought back instant memories of 9/11. Military action will continue. MILITARY ACTION WILL CONTINUE
The attempted bombing of Flight 253 by the 23-year-old Nigerian was obviously not meant to destroy the plane. Had Abdul Mutallab actually exploded his "explosive device" the terror event would have had no immediate propaganda value. First, the wreckage would have to be found in the depths of the North Atlantic or expanses of eastern Canada and then an official investigation conducted to determine what had happened to the Delta flight that had suddenly disappeared from the radar screen. It could take weeks or months before anyone would even be blamed for the attack. That certainly wouldn't help the Zionist planners advance their "War on Terror" so it was decided to carry out an "attempted" bombing, like the earlier "shoe bomber," in which the inept bomber would be caught red-handed in the act of committing a terror atrocity.
A group of Republican senators, led by the pro-Israel Republican John McCain (who visited Israel over the weekend of January 9-10) are seeking to transfer the Abdul Mutallab case to a military court. Why would a pro-Israeli senator like McCain want this young Nigerian tried by a military tribunal? McCain and others argue that critical questions such as the identities of those who assisted and trained Abdul Mutallab remain unanswered. Indeed, they are and will probably remain so. Did he receive funding and support from others, and if so, from whom? The first question should be whether Abdul Mutallab was really in his right mind or whether he had been subjected to mind-control methods that made him an unwitting Manchurian Candidate. Eyewitness reports about his appearance and initial responses strongly suggest that he was under some form of mind-control. Will a trial in a U.S. District Court really get to the bottom of who is behind Abdul Mutallab? The U.S. war in Afghanistan is supposedly being waged against Al Qaida because of their role in the terror attacks of 9-11, but the actual target has always been the Taliban, an Islamic movement. Islamic movements of this type are naturally anti-Zionist. The Israeli planners of the War on Terror seek to inflame passions on both sides to the point that the U.S. war on Islam takes on its own dynamic but that has not yet happened so the Zionist terrorists stoke the fire by creating false-flag terror events like 9-11 - and the attempted bombing of the Delta flight on Christmas Day.
The Israeli Mossad continues to operate in Yemen, as the President of Yemen Ali Abdullah Saleh revealed openly in early October 2008: "A terrorist cell was arrested five days ago and will be referred to the judicial authorities for its links with the Israeli intelligence services."
Finis
The Big Lie and the Paradigms of Deceit
January 6, 2010 The following essay, entitled "The Paradigms of Deceit," is written by a Danish friend and supporter named Kaj Krinsmøe. It is an excellent explanation of the well known propaganda tactic used to shape public opinion, described and employed by Adolf Hitler as "The Great Lie" or "Colossal Untruth" -- and how the Great Lie is currently being used by our corrupt political leaders and the Zionist-controlled media on the people of North America and Europe. The "colossal untruths" of our time are the government and media lies about the events of 9-11, Islamic terrorism and Afghanistan, global warming, and the Iranian nuclear threat. The Zionist deception known as the "War on Terror" is a complete fraud -- and an extremely expensive one at that.
HITLER ON "THE BIG LIE" * * * THE PARADIGMS OF DECEIT Kaj Krinsmøe The well known houses of Jewish finance were behind the promotion of Communism, Socialism, and the ensuing international political collusion. Today, this collusion has played out its role. It is defunct and the effects of international usury are becoming more and more visible to people whose awareness has emerged from the chaos of the Western mass media’s “cognitive dissonance”.
Thousands of Americans have begun to realize that it is the predatory usury of Wall Street in recent years that has caused the recession of their economic circumstances. Usurious credit, not capitalism, is the evil that has subverted their nation.
The facts are that Iran is rich in resources. It has large deposits of uranium, oil, and natural gas. Compared to this, what does Israel have? Nothing. In fact, Israel does not even have enough water without stealing water from its neighbors.
Finis January 3, 2010 Hitler On The Big Lie, Mein Kampf, Jewish Virtual Library
The Smirking Chimp, 9-11, and the Jewish Predicament
New Year's Day 2010 By the way, for your information, I began reading at The Smirking Chimp about 6 months ago and liked the intellectual tone, so I registered and made a few comments about other posts. So one morning recently after I had read your article on 9-11, I posted the following: "If you want to read the most plausible explanation of who was responsible for 9-11, go to the website, "Israeli Connection to 9-11" and it came back as a post right away. However when I came back that afternoon, the post was gone and my user ID had been blocked and remains blocked. What this reader experienced with The Smirking Chimp is actually fairly typical of how most American Jews react to the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 – with angry denial and rejection. The Smirking Chimp, a leftish website owned and controlled by a foul-mouthed New Jersey Jew named Jeff Tiedrich, is a good example of this knee-jerk reaction.
One can easily see that Tiedrich uses extremely vulgar language on his site in response to comments made by critics of Zionist crimes and racism -- before banning them from posting on the site. Jeff is evidently unable to accept or respond to criticism of Israel or the racist nature of Zionism, which crops up among his readers. It isn't surprising that Tiedrich is unable to deal with the difficult questions surrounding Zionism. He is, after all, just a middle-class Jew from New Jersey who supports Zionism because of his tribal loyalty.
What I find disingenuous about Jeff Tiedrich's website is that he doesn't inform his readers that he is a Jew from a Zionist family. With Jewish mega criminals like Bernard Madoff and Maurice Greenberg - from his community and city - robbing the public and the U.S. taxpayer, and the Zionist-controlled media and shadow government ruining the United States, it seems very dishonest for Jeff not to be upfront with his readers about his ethnic background. Shouldn't readers know who controls and moderates the political websites they use to exchange information? I provide my readers with my background information and am often asked about my ties to Israel. A check of the Dictionary of Jewish Surnames shows that Tiedrich is a Jewish name from Galicia in Eastern Europe. Galicia was a very poor and primitive region (on the Dniester River in what is today the western Ukraine) when many peasants and Jews migrated to the United States in the 1880s. Tiedrich's great grandfather Aaron, for example, came to America in 1882. Jeff grew up in Rockaway, New Jersey, the son of Warren and Joan Tiedrich, stalwart members of the Jewish synagogue Temple Beth Am of Parsippany, New Jersey. Jeff graduated from the Morris Hills High School in Rockaway in 1975 as his sister Ellen did in 1977.
I am discussing Jeff Tiedrich's difficulties addressing the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 because it is a good example of the predicament that faces every American Jew -- and Israeli. The Jewish community has a peculiar and distinct tribal dimension quite unlike nearly every other ethnic group in the United States. American Jews are raised with a tribal mentality that they should not openly criticize another Jew or complain about the problems within the Jewish community to a person from outside that community, i.e. a non-Jew. This tribal allegiance is, however, a dangerous two-edged sword. When the criminal behavior and misconduct of the Jews become intolerable for the host nation, the entire Jewish community is usually punished, often with expulsion, which has happened in virtually every European nation at least once. JUDAH AT THE CROSSROADS Arthur Koestler, the Hungarian Jewish author and Zionist pioneer in Palestine, wrote an interesting essay entitled "Judah at the Crossroads" about the Jewish dilemma caused by the creation of the Zionist (Jewish) state of Israel in 1948. A disenchanted Communist, Koestler wrote a powerful anti-Communist novel, Darkness at Noon, in 1940. Koestler wrote about things he knew a great deal about and had personal experience of. His 1971 book The Thirteenth Tribe is about the Khazar origins of Eastern Europe's non-Semitic Ashkenazi Jews.
The Budapest-born Koestler said Jews in the Diaspora faced a dilemma that required choosing between either assimilating into the nations in which they lived or going to Israel. Koestler said it is not right to raise Jewish children in exile with a sense of separation and longing for Jerusalem when Jews could simply move to Israel and live as fully realized Jews in the Jewish state. Koestler knew very well what he was talking about. He had lived in Palestine in the 1920s and experienced the rigors of being a Zionist pioneer. Koestler personally worked with Vladimir Jabotinsky, the father of Revisionist Zionism, the Irgun terror gang, and the Haganah, and even met with the Zionist arch-terrorist Menachem Begin, the head of the Irgun Gang in 1944 to try to persuade him to stop using terrorism. Koestler failed to persuade Begin to abandon terrorism and accept a two-state solution for Palestine. As he wrote in his memoirs: “When the meeting was over, I realized how naïve I had been to imagine that my arguments would have even the slightest influence.”
The Zionists, however, are strongly opposed to Jewish assimilation in the Diaspora because it reduces the number and motivation of Jews to support or migrate to Israel. To be called an "assimilated Jew" by an Israeli leader is an insult to American and European Jews who have sought to integrate into the societies in which they live. I feel sorry for American Jews who are weighed down with the knowledge that Israeli military intelligence played a key role in the crimes of 9-11. The controlled media lies to the Jewish community and general public about the evidence of Israeli involvement in the false-flag terror attacks. A good example of this can be seen in the CNN hit piece that was done in an attempt to smear me as an anti-Semite in January 2007, which aired on the Paula Zahn show the night before my trial. The CNN editors dragged up the canard that 4,000 Jews had been forewarned prior to the attacks and cruelly presented it as evidence of anti-Semitic propaganda to Wilton Sexer, a Jewish man who had lost his son, Jason, at the World Trade Center.
By 2007, even the editors at CNN must have known that this report had originated with the Jerusalem Post Online, which had received the information directly from the Israeli government. The families of some 4,000 Israeli citizens expected to have been at work at the WTC or the Pentagon on 9-11 had contacted the Israeli Foreign Ministry asking about the whereabouts of their relatives. The editor of the Jerusalem Post later confirmed in writing in 2003 that the newspaper's report on this matter had been completely accurate, as I wrote in an article in April 2005: The fact that only one Israeli died at the WTC, while 4,000 Israelis were thought to have been at the scene of the attacks on 9/11 naturally led to a widespread rumor, blamed on Arabic sources, that Israelis had been forewarned to stay away that day. It was CNN that intentionally confused the issue by mis-using the word Jews instead of Israelis and giving the grieving American Jewish father false information in the first place. This is an excellent example of how the Zionist-controlled media uses false information to control the thinking and emotions of American Jews and the general public. As Mark Twain said, "There are laws to protect the freedom of the press's speech, but none that are worth anything to protect the people from the press." American Jews face a predicament over 9-11 very similar to the one described by Koestler in "Judah at the Crossroads." Will they continue to meekly maintain the dictates of tribal loyalty and protect the criminal network in their community or will they bravely and openly address and confront the rampant criminality in the Jewish community? The welfare and future of the Jewish community in the United States depends on how American Jews respond to this predicament. Finis Sources and Recommended Reading: Bollyn, Christopher, "The Israeli Connection to 9-11" http://www.bollyn.com/public/Israeli_Connection_to_9-11.pdf
The Moldovan Menorah, Michel Friedman, and the Jewish Crimocracy
Updated December 23, 2009
On December 13, some 200 Orthodox Christians in the Moldovan capital Chisinau removed the large, metal menorah that had been set up in downtown Europe Square, and placed it upside down on Stefan cel Mare Square at the base of a statue of King Stephen the Great. The menorah was replaced by an Orthodox cross, the religious symbol of the vast majority of the Moldovan population. MICHEL FRIEDMAN - SEX CRIMINAL
There is a secret Jewish organization controlling our governments whose power and presence can be discerned by its effect on our nations. This largely unseen force is criminal in nature and corrupts our governments through its secret control of our elections, central banks, political parties and politicians, mass media, and courts. A government which has fallen under the control of this secret criminal network becomes what I call a "crimocracy." A hallmark of such a state is that Jewish criminals are protected by the courts and media. Michel Friedman, a well-known leader of the German Jewish community is a good example of such a criminal.
The steel menorah in Chicago's Daley Plaza is a stark reminder of who wields the real power in President Barack Obama's adopted hometown of Chicago. When I lived in the Windy City, my hometown, a local Jewish atheist had succeeded in having the traditional crèche nativity scene with the baby Jesus in the manger banned on the grounds that it was a religious symbol. But a massive and ugly steel menorah, the religious symbol of the Jews, is permitted - without question - in the central plaza of a city that is overwhelmingly Christian. As I have revealed in previous articles, the real power behind President Obama and Mayor Richard M. Daley is the secret Jewish network. Obama, for example, was cultivated as a political candidate since 1992 by Bettylu Saltzman, the daughter of the former president of B'nai B'rith International, the secret society of Jewish Freemasons.
Friedman has been attending the trial of John Demjanjuk, a frail Ukranian immigrant from Cleveland, and promoting himself and the Zionist agenda as he is paid to do. The fact that Michel Friedman is the criminal who should be on trial for the outrageous crimes he has committed is never discussed in the controlled press.
Prostitution is legal in Germany so the illegal use of "forced prostitutes" gives us some idea of the human slavery Friedman was up to. The "forced prostitutes" that Michel Friedman used on hundreds of occasions were very young girls, mostly from the Ukraine, who had been tricked, trafficked, and kidnapped into becoming sex slaves. She disagreed saying that she had personally witnessed a similar cover-up of a series of serious crimes committed by Michel Friedman. Friedman, unmarried and using an alias, had on hundreds of occasions ordered two underage girls to serve his sexual needs. They were always to be very young, about 15 or 16, and large-breasted. The police had found evidence of some 371 different times when Friedman, using the alias Paolo Pinkas, had requested pairs of girls to be sent to him. Hundreds of young girls were violated by Friedman, the drug-addicted sexual pervert. Where is the justice? Why is Friedman allowed to get away with human trafficking and sexual crimes that would result in a long prison sentence for anyone else?
This is how the Jewish crimocracy works. Jewish criminals like Bernard Madoff of New York, Joachim Posener of Sweden, and Michel Friedman of Germany are allowed to get away with outrageous and serious crimes, the extent and nature of which are never revealed to the people. Other criminals, like Menachem Atzmon of Israel, are allowed to control sensitive operations in Germany, such as the port of Rostock, and the United States, where this convicted Israeli political figure and Mossadnik ran passenger screening operations at the airports of 9-11. The fact that Atzmon's crucial role in the terrorism of 9-11 has not been divulged in the tort litigation of 9-11 underlines the Zionist control of the obstructed judicial process in which the relatives of 9-11 seek in vain to obtain justice and accountability for their losses. Eight years after the attacks there has still not been a trial for the families who lost loved ones on 9-11 and it appears there never will be a trial in the court of U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, a devoted Zionist and father of a son who lives on an illegal Israeli settlement on the West Bank. finis Sources and Recommended Reading: Source: Moldovan church blames Jews for menorah incident, December 22, 2009
Understanding the 9-11 Bombing of WTC 6
December 21, 2009 May Allah/God help you in your struggle for the truth.
An amazingly callous Netanyahu told the New York Times on 9-11 (when early estimates were about 10,000 dead) that the terror attacks were "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations. His subsequent comments about how Israel was benefiting from 9-11 were made in Hebrew at Bar-Ilan University, a religious Zionist school, and were directed at an audience that is certainly well aware of Israel's involvement in the false-flag terror of 9-11. These comments were obviously not meant to be translated for worldwide reading (the original article was published in the Hebrew language newspaper Maariv) and should be seen as a sort of public confession in which the leader of the Likud, Israel's right-wing extremist movement, sought to rationalize the Israeli false-flag terror atrocity on the United States. Joe Lockhart, spokesman for President Bill Clinton, described Netanyahu as "one of the most obnoxious individuals you're going to come into - just a liar and a cheat. He could open his mouth and you could have no confidence that anything that came out of it was the truth." It's high time for an international arrest warrant to be put out for Netanyahu and Ehud Barak to be tried for terrorism and war crimes. THE HIDDEN BOMBING OF WTC 6 The split-second precision of the bombing of WTC 6 reveals the sophisticated military planning of the criminal mastermind behind 9-11. The blatant cover-up of this explosion, witnessed by hundreds of gagged members of New York's fire and police departments, is ample evidence of the complicity of the controlled media to hide the truth of what happened on 9-11, along with the mayors of New York City and the U.S. government.
As I reported in my article "What Caused the WTC 6 Crater?" of July 10, 2002, CNN confirmed to me that the mysterious blast had occurred at precisely the same moment that the second plane struck the South Tower: Despite the fact that the horrible events of September 11 occurred in broad daylight and were widely photographed, significant aspects of the attacks have been completely suppressed by a media blackout. A massive explosion, witnessed by millions of television viewers on CNN, evidently devastated WTC 6, the 8-story U.S. Customs House, although no national newspaper or media outlet has said a word about it. When I revisited this subject in June 2009, I examined some photos by the late Bill Biggert that showed that WTC 6 had been badly damaged before the collapse of either tower. I also discussed the discovery by Kurt Sonnenfeld, a FEMA photographer, now living in exile in Argentina, that the underground vault of the building had been cleaned out before 9-11. This story is extremely important because it reveals that there was a criminal mastermind behind 9-11 who was able to time the explosion in WTC 6 to coincide exactly with the crash of the airplane into the South Tower. It also reveals that the terror attack was designed to conceal the theft of the contents of the underground vaults - evidence of serious crimes and valuables such as gold. This is identical to the Zionist terror bombing of Jerusalem's King David Hotel on July 22, 1946, during the British Mandate.
The King David Hotel served as headquarters for the British forces, and housed the evidence that would have resulted in many of these Zionist terrorists being hanged. The destruction of this evidence was the primary reason for the bombing, which was carried out by Irgun and Haganah terrorists. The commander of the Irgun terror gang from 1943-1948 was Menachem Begin who later became Israel’s sixth prime minister in the 1970s and 1980s. The head of terror operations for the Irgun was Yerucham Livni from Grodno, father of Israel's former foreign minister Tzipi Livni (who is currently wanted for war crimes in Britain). The children of these Zionist terrorists from the 1940s are the leaders of Israel today.
The Zionist-controlled media in the United States and Britain have ignored the evidence of the huge explosion that destroyed WTC 6 as the plane crash distracted cameras and onlookers. This was the plan. It is like a circus where the attention of the audience is controlled by the use of spotlights that illuminate one act while the rest of the arena is in darkness. In this respect, the bombing of WTC 6 is like the huge debris field that is about one mile from the small crater where we are told the plane crashed in Shanksville. The public's attention is focused on the twenty-foot crater while the real evidence is kept hidden from the prying eyes of the press.
Sources and Recommended Reading: Bollyn, Christopher, "What Caused the WTC 6 Crater?" July 10, 2002 Bollyn, "An Inconvenient Witness: Sonnenfeld on WTC 6," June 24, 2009 Christopher Bollyn exposed as a 911 frump!, DavidIcke.com, September 2009
Scam Update: Global Warming & Ben Bernanke
December 19, 2009 GLOBALIST SUMMIT ENDS IN CHAOS AND COLD Manipulated climate data and a wise call for a U.S. boycott - "Climate-gate," as the e-mails and other documents from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia have become known, exposes a highly politicized scientific circle -- the same circle whose work underlies efforts at the Copenhagen climate change conference. The agenda-driven policies being pushed in Copenhagen won't change the weather, but they would change our economy for the worse... Are Maurice Strong, Al Gore, and the globalists trying to hijack public policy? "Global Warming: It is a hoax. It is bad science. It is hijacking public policy. It is the greatest scam in history." How can Deutsche Bank's asset manager know that global warming will cause the extinction of the human race? Is he also a scientist? “People often ask about the costs. But the figures people tend to cite don’t take into account conservation and efficiency measures that are easily available. And they don’t look at the cost of inaction, which is the extinction of the human race. Period.” Question of the Day: Are "Chemtrails" Meant to Raise Local Temps to Bolster the Global Warming Agenda? That certainly seems to be the case.
Californians shivered in Redding where record low temperatures dipped to 16 degrees F (-8 C) on December 9. The Sacramento Valley saw bitter cold on December 8 with only 19 degrees F (-7 C) in Red Bluff and 23 degrees F (-5 C) in Sacramento. The same cold front brought 20 inches of snow to Flagstaff, Arizona, more than four times the record of 5 inches set in 1956. TIME'S MAN OF THE YEAR: MEGA-SHYSTER BEN BERNANKE
The Amazing Story Behind the Global Warming Scam
Strong developed the concept that the UN could demand payments from the advanced nations for the climatic damage from their burning of fossil fuels to benefit the underdeveloped nations—a sort of CO2 tax that would be the funding for his one-world government. But he needed more scientific evidence to support his primary thesis. So Strong championed the establishment of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN IPCC). This was not a pure, “climate study” scientific organization, as we have been led to believe. It was an organization of one-world government UN bureaucrats, environmental activists and environmentalist scientists who craved UN funding so they could produce the science they needed to stop the burning of fossil fuels. Finis Originally written January 28, 2009 (Revised and edited February 11, 2009) Bollyn, The Fleecing of America: 9-11 and the Crisis on Wall Street Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’, Icecap.us, November 11, 2007 Sarah Palin, "Copenhagen's political science", Washington Post, December 9, 2009
Bollyn 9-11 Book Available in Norwegian
December 14, 2009 My book, Solving 9-11, The Deception that Changed the World, is now available for Norwegian readers through BitTorrent and an easily downloadable pdf version of some 550 pages. The first few chapters have been translated into Norwegian, while the rest of the book is in English. Everything going well here with Askehaug and your book, «9/11-koden». The book is spreading mainly through BitTorrent, but it's also acessible for web download: I am very glad to see that my book is available in Norwegian and that my thesis is reaching so many people in so many forms. Of course it will be wonderful to see my book in print and available in libraries and bookstores but there is a strong counter-force that makes that difficult. I hope to have my book published as soon as possible, but until that happens I am encouraged to see that the material is available for free via the Internet for those who are interested.
Bollyn on the B'nai B'rith - AZL Roundtable
December 12, 2009 I was recently interviewed on Tony Hmura's AZL (Anti-Zionist League) Roundtable. The discussion, which is about 100 minutes long, is about the secret organization of Jewish freemasons known as the B'nai B'rith and my article "Why Afghanistan?" It is my second interview with the AZL Roundtable, which is based in Worcester, Massachusetts. The interview can be listened to at: http://azlroundtable.podbean.com/
The Criminal Nature of the Zionist Controlled Press
December 8, 2009
From the practical point of view, it is obvious, whatever the case may be, that one hypothesis leads to the same consequences as the other. Politically and socially, Masonry and Judaism combine into one and the same campaign, against which it is good to fight, whether by doing so one fights simply a humanitarian, levelling utopianism, having its principle and its end in itself, or whether, on the other hand, one may by doing so paralyse one of the main instruments in the service of the occult will-to-power of a race which is not ours, and whose triumph, visible or invisible, could only mean the decline of the highest heritage of the best Indo-European civilisation.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
The false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 should serve as a giant red light for the American people. If the mass murder of thousands of our fellow citizens doesn't shake us out of our political apathy, nothing will. The events of 9-11 and the criminal cover-up of the truth of what really happened that day are like the visible tip of a treacherous iceberg. The media cover-up of the real evidence of 9-11 provides us with the most obvious evidence that the United States is ruled by a very nasty crimocracy and their wholly-owned media.
My most unusual point-of-view concerning 9-11 has given me greater insight and a different perspective than any other journalist writing about this subject. I am the only American journalist to have suffered a brutal attack and torture with TASER by a three-man tactical squad of heavily-armed undercover police at his home and then forced to endure malicious prosecution, a form of pay-back from the criminals running the United States.
As Thomas Jefferson wrote about the misinformation in the press: "The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day." I am in such a situation. I am in the position to confront the media lies about 9-11 with the facts, which is the main reason I was brutally attacked by an undercover tactical police squad and subsequently fired as a journalist from a controlled paper in Washington, D.C.
Gerald Levin, the head of CNN, sent a team to my home near Chicago to interview me about 9-11. I quickly saw that the CNN reporters had no interest in the evidence of 9-11 and only wanted to get footage of me that they could use to slander me as an anti-Semite. Their hit piece aired on CNN the day before my trial was supposed to begin in the court of Hyman I. Riebman, a Zionist judge in Cook County. Gerald Levin is a member of the Media Lodge of B'nai B'rith, a lodge of the Jewish secret society that is open only to Zionist Jews who have senior positions in the media world. This is the secret vehicle of the Zionist media conspiracy. When Levin's son was murdered in 1997, Louise E. Dembeck, a veteran lawyer and executive with TimeWarner and then president of the "Music, Entertainment and Media Division of B'nai Brith", published a note of condolence on the obituary page of the New York Times, the secret society's controlled mouthpiece owned by the Sulzberger family of Lodge No. 1.
Sam Zell, the man who destroyed the Chicago Tribune (and L.A. Times, Hartford Courant, Newsday, WGN, etc.), recently left the CEO position of the Tribune company. The Tribune is now fighting for survival, weighed down with billions of dollars of debts loaded onto the company when it was turned private by Zell. Zell is, however, a well-known Zionist criminal from Chicago. Criminals like Zell have a known pattern of criminal behavior, which the Chicago Tribune knew all about. The Tribune covered the story in the late 1970s when Zell and three other lawyers were indicted for having participated in "serious and calculated fraud on the United States." Zell was only able to avoid prison by co-operating with the prosecution - and sending Roger S. Baskes, his brother-in-law to jail. Zell, Baskes, and two others had concocted an elaborate scheme using shell companies in the Bahamas to hide some $700,000 from the government. Baskes was sent to jail for two years although I don't know how long he actually stayed in jail. Baskes is the son of Mr. Irwin Baskes. His mother, Ella Rosenberg Baskes, was a vice president of the B'nai B'rith. Sources and Recommended Reading: "The Bollyn Trial: The Criminalization of an Outspoken Journalist," June 29, 2007 Evola, Julius, "The Relationship between Judaism and Freemasonry"
The Jewish Secret Society That Controls the U.S. Media
December 1, 2009 "Thanks to the God of Truth..." Thanks to the God of TRUTH for giving the world a few brave truth tellers who forsake the easy, safe life to dig out the facts and risk their necks to make it available. Bollyn and others have not been harrassed because they are spreading fantasy, but because they are making the enemies of freedom and truth uneasy. They know that secrecy and deception are their tools and that an informed public is their undoing. Tuesday Radio Show on RBN Subject: Proof of a Conspiracy - The Evidence that a Secret Brotherhood Controls the U.S. Media I discussed the key role played by the secret Jewish freemasonic "brotherhood" of B'nai B'rith in the cover-up of the truth of 9-11. This is a very old and powerful Jewish secret society, founded by 12 German Jews in New York City in 1843, which has long had immense influence in the spheres of the U.S. judicial system, government, intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and media. The B'nai B'rith is a secret organization that works to promote a foreign and un-American agenda -- Zionism. Many of its members are high-level judges. What does this say about judicial corruption by members of a secret society for Jews only?
The B'nai B'rith - eager to swell its ranks - was instrumental in recruiting and bringing hundreds of thousands of Jews from Eastern Europe to the U.S. in the late 1800s. The illiterate and uneducated Jews from the ghettos of Lithuania, Romania, Poland, Ukraine, and Byelorussia were sent to frontier towns like Cleveland and became new members of the growing secret society. The family of the Cleveland gangster Sam Miller, father of Aaron Miller of the State Departmen, and the Chertoff family are such B'nai B'rith families. Obama's chief of staff Rahm Emanuel comes from two B'nai B'rith families of Chicago - the Auerbach and the Smulevitz clans. Michael Goff, the founding manager of Ptech, the Mossad Trojan Horse of 9-11, is the son and grandson of the leading B'nai B'rith 32nd Degree Masons of Worcester, Massachusetts. The secret society of B'nai B'rith now has immense influence in virtually every town and village across the United States and Canada. The judge, the clerk, and your lawyer are probably all members of the same secret society. That is the kind of injustice I experienced in Cook County when I was maliciously prosecuted for my 9-11 research in 2007.
Like many other Jewish media moguls, Gerald M. Levin (the head of HBO AOL Time Warner) who took over CNN from Ted Turner in the mid-1990s, is also a member of the Media Lodge of B'nai B'rith. The Zionists wanted complete control of the U.S. mass media and conspired to get CNN away from Turner's control. CNN's live coverage of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982 showed that a Gentile-owned media network of such size was a serious threat to the Zionist criminal agenda. In order to understand WHY the U.S. mass media will never address the facts and evidence of Israeli involvement in the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 it is essential to understand how this secret Zionist organization controls the U.S. media. This Jews-only secret society has a distinctly foreign agenda, something which should be of concern to all Americans.
FUCHS: Well, now, several men, such as Frank Goldman, who I believe was president at the time we're mainly interested in, of B’nai B’rith, and Maurice Bisgyer, were, it would seem to me, in my limited reading, rather pro-Zionist to quite a degree. Sources and Recommended Reading:
B'nai B'rith – The Jewish Secret Society that Dominates America
November 22, 2009
The election of Barack Obama has provided us with a glimpse of the hidden hand that controls the government of the United States. The politicians and policies of the U.S. government do not actually come from the people but are presented to the public through the controlled media. The two most influential papers in the United States, The New York Times and Washington Post, are both controlled by German Jewish families that are among the founding members of the Jewish secret society the B'nai B'rith. The B'nai B'rith, an order of Jewish Freemasonry, is closed to non-Jews which puts its Jewish members at the top of the Masonic hierarchy. The members of B'nai B'rith are able to join other Masonic orders but only Jews can belong to B'nai B'rith.
'Do you really think that criminals are clever, good people, Thrasymachus?' Secret anti-Christian organizations like the Freemasons and B'nai B'rith are like the fabled black holes of astronomy. Like other unseen astronomical bodies, astronomers postulate the existence of black holes based on how they distort light and affect other bodies around them. So is it with the Jewish B'nai B'rith and other Freemasonic secret societies, which we know very little about but whose presence can be seen in how they pervade every level of our society and affect everything around us.
Finis Sources and Recommended Reading: "B'nai B'rith and Israel: The Unbroken Covenant," 1998, The B'nai B'rith World Center, Israel
Terror Risk High as Obama Ponders Afghan Fiasco
November 18, 2009
Unlike Alexander the Great, the U.S. has not built any new cities in Afghanistan and they are having a very hard time holding on to the capital, Kabul, which is the only place their installed puppet Hamid Karzai has any political power whatsoever. The fact that Karzai stole the recent election through massive vote fraud exposes the lie that the U.S. is fighting to bring democracy to Afghanistan. Thus far the U.S.-led occupation has only succeeded in producing bumper crops of opium for the illegal drug trade and putting in power one of the most corrupt regimes on Earth. The cost of the illegal invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq is already more than $1 trillion, when one factors in the future costs that will be incurred from the long-term care for the thousands of seriously wounded and mentally disturbed U.S. veterans, which already number in the tens of thousands. Pray tell, Mr. Obama, exactly what benefits have these illegal wars brought to the American people to justify such huge costs? Why are we still slogging away against the people of Afghanistan?
As President Barack Hussein Obama ponders what to do about the fiasco in Afghanistan, the risk of a false-flag terror attack that forces his hand is greatly increased. An Israeli-designed terror attack that is seen by the public as having been committed by Al Qaida would serve as an effective decision maker for Obama and swing public opinion behind sending more troops to the eight-year-old war of occupation in Afghanistan. This is why I consider the chances of another terror attack to be blamed on Al Qaida to be very high at the moment. The false-flag terror attack may not happen in the United States. The U.S.-occupied nations of Iraq and Afghanistan (as well as Pakistan) suffer false-flag terror attacks on a weekly basis, especially when there is a foreign dignitary like Hillary Clinton around to impress. These nations suffer terror casualties on the scale of 9-11 every year. A spectacular terror attack during a high profile diplomatic visit is typical of Israeli-designed terror attacks. They carried out one like this in Israel a few years ago across the street from the hotel of a visiting American diplomat to press their point. The victims were mainly Russian immigrants. Because it is much easier for the Zionists to carry out large scale false-flag terror attacks in these occupied nations there might be a terror attack on U.S. forces that compels Obama to send more forces. What the architects of the "War on Terror" clearly need to do is try to get U.S. and Euopean public opinion behind their fraudulent war in Afghanistan. They would be aiming to carry out a false-flag attack that decisively swings public opinion behind a massive increase in troops on the ground in occupied Afghanistan.
One has to remember that the real goal of the war in Afghanistan has nothing to do with democracy or the terrorism of 9-11. The U.S.-led invasion and occupation is meant to occupy and pacify the country to allow for the construction of the TAPI pipeline to transport the Mossad-owned gas of Turkmenistan to India and China. When this pipeline is built, the Mossadnik Yosef Maiman and his Israeli partners will become tremendously wealthy selling the gas resources of Turkmenistan, which they own and control.
The Israelis certainly have not shelved this plan because of the high casualties being suffered by U.S. and NATO forces. The Israeli terrorists who masterminded 9-11, the invasion of Afghanistan, and the utterly fraudulent "War on Terror" (e.g. Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak) are at the top of their game -- and running the Israeli government.
The current Israeli government is very close to the Obama administration. With Rahm Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist, running the White House, one might think that the Israeli government is calling the shots in the Oval Office. As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Lally Weymouth, senior editor of Newsweek and The Washington Post (both owned by her family, the descendants of the Zionist and German Jewish banker Eugene Meyer), in late October 2009: There is much greater cooperation and transparency between the Obama administration and my government than people know. We speak openly and I greatly appreciate steps taken by the Obama administration against the distorted Goldstone report and their pressure on Iran to stop its military nuclear program as well as the ongoing efforts we are making to re-launch the peace negotiations between us and the Palestinians.
Lally Weymouth is the daughter of Katharine (Meyer) Graham and grandaughter of Eugene Isaac Meyer, the Zionist Jew banker of Lazard Freres who served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1930 to 1933 and who bought The Washington Post at a bankruptcy auction in 1933. Like most U.S. news outlets, both the New York Times and Washington Post are owned by Zionist Jewish families. Sources and Recommended Reading:
Foreword to Solving 9-11 & the Mystery of Flight 93
November 11, 2009 Glen Stanish, a professional pilot who flew for American Airlines on 9-11, has contributed an excellent foreword for my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. Stanish puts the Israeli false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 into the historical context of the Middle East "peace process" and the radical Likud Party's agenda to prevent any solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict that would create an independent Palestinian state or allow the millions of refugees to return to their homes and land in Israeli-occupied Palestine. The foreword, entitled Truth Marches On, can be read by clicking on the title or the URL: http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book#article_11506 Stanish is also the author of an article about the lack of debris at the Shanksville "crash site" entitled "Where is the Wreckage of UAL 93?" and an excellent book entitled Uncle Sam's Christian Patriots that discusses my early research and writing about 9-11. The book by the Christian pilot Glen Stanish can be ordered through Amazon by clicking on the following title:
Something very strange and sinister happened in Shanksville on 9-11. I have been there several times and met several people who have been told not to talk about what they saw on 9-11. Wally Miller, the coroner for Somerset County, is a key person who played an important role although he was actually put on the sidelines by the FBI, who asked him if he was going to be a team player and let them take over the accident site, which by Pennsylvania law belongs to the county coroner. Early on, Wally said some very clear statements about the absence of wreckage and body parts. He has since tried to recant those statements. With the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center, I am reviewing the Shanksville crash and the role played on Flight 11 by the Israeli veteran of the Sayeret Matkal, Daniel Lewin. Now that we have proof that the official version is a devious fabrication and are aware of the architect roles played in 9-11 by the Israeli politicians Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu, both senior members of the elite Sayeret Matkal of the Israeli military, we have a much better idea of the kind of deception we are up against.
New York Times, Sept. 22, 2001
The following video clips give some idea of Wally's changing story:
Sen. Bob Graham told the BBC that the government is withholding information and keeping secrets about what really happened on 9-11. Why is the Obama administration continuing to keep the American public in the dark about what happened on 9-11?
Mossad in Germany and 9-11 Disinformation
November 9, 2009 Mossad Penetration of Germany
International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS International N.V.), the Israeli company headed by the Mossad veteran Menachem J. Atzmon, owns Huntleigh USA, the company that ran airport security and passenger screening operations at Boston's Logan and other critical airports on 9-11. Huntleigh, which is owned by the criminal-run outfit ICTS, is one of the main defendants in the 9-11 tort litigation, and has been protected by the Zionist judge, Alvin K. Hellerstein, who has blocked all attempts for a trial to find those responsible. Atzmon, a convicted criminal of the Likud Party in Israel, owns and operates Seehafen Rostock, the largest cargo port of the former East Germany, a position he has held since January 1998. That an Israeli criminal has been allowed to operate one of Germany's largest ports illustrates the degree of Mossad influence in Germany. Israeli ownership of the port operations of Rostock is, however, just the tip of the Zionist iceberg that controls Germany. The massive clouds of dust that accompanied the destruction of the three demolished towers on 9-11 presented a mystery that needed to be solved in order to understand what really happened during the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC 7, the three towers owned or leased by the Zionist Jew Larry Silverstein. Some 425,000 cubic meters of concrete from the 220 floors of the Twin Towers completely disintegrated before they hit the ground and formed the most substantial part of the immense pyroclastic clouds of hot dust that rolled down the streets of lower Manhattan on 9-11.
Although the Zionist-controlled U.S. government and controlled media claim that the towers fell in non-explosive pancake-like collapses, no evidence of the 220 concrete floors or the metal pans that held them were to be seen in the pile of rubble. What really happened to these fundamental elements of the structures and what caused the pulverization of the concrete floors --and everything on them?
In November 2001, as the administration of George W. Bush began fighting the Israeli-designed "War on Terror" in Afghanistan, I decided to move my family to Germany. My early research of the available evidence and news reports strongly indicated that Israeli military intelligence had carried out 9-11 as a false-flag terror operation to be blamed on Osama Bin Laden's Al Qaida. The Zionist-controlled U.S. government and media pushed for the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan based on this unproven version of events. The government and media were evidently involved in a criminal cover-up of what really happened. It didn't seem safe or prudent to pursue critical 9-11 research in the United States as the nation went to war based on an explanation I had already found to be a pack of lies.
At the end of November 2001, I was able to interview Andreas von Bülow, a former parliamentarian and an expert on intelligence matters at his home near Cologne. He and I saw eye-to-eye on the role played by Israeli intelligence in the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11. I also spoke to other former senior officials of German intelligence agencies who provided me with valuable insights about the terror attacks that were allegedly partly engineered in Germany, as the official story goes. The pile at Ground Zero was still smoking in November and emitting huge amounts of nano-sized particles produced by the incredibly hot thermitic reactions in which iron was boiling beneath the rubble. It would be another month, until the end of the year, before the fires were put out and even longer before crews reached to the bottom of the pile where pools of molten iron were found, a discovery that led directly to the now proven thesis that Thermite was used to destroy the three towers.
Disinformation on Cause of Pulverized Towers Shortly after arriving in Germany, I was introduced to a former East German intelligence agent, who I was told, was "Frau Marek". I don't know what her real name is. Frau Marek, I was told, had been one of the East German (DDR) "beautiful young swallows" of Markus Wolf, the German Jewish communist who co-founded and ran the DDR's Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung (HVA), the foreign intelligence division of the Ministry for State Security, commonly known as the Stasi, from 1953 until 1987.
Markus Wolf was born in 1923 in the southern German town of Hechingen, the home of many influential Jewish families. Wolf, whose Jewish communist family spent the war in the Soviet Union, was sent from the Soviet Union to Berlin after the war with Walter Ulbricht, the founder of the totalitarian East German state, the DDR. Wolf worked as a journalist for a radio station in the Soviet Zone of occupation and was among the observers of the Nuremberg Trials.
Frau Marek, who I met on several occasions, had worked for several intelligence agencies including Israel's Mossad, by her own admission. As a "swallow" for Markus Wolf and the Stasi, I was told that Marek had worked to infiltrate NATO by seducing high-level officials. She had a background in physics and told me that she had information about a directed-energy infrared beam weapon that had been developed by the Soviet Union. This infrared beam weapon, she said, could have been used on 9-11 and, if so, could have been the cause of the pulverization of the concrete in the towers. Television viewers saw the immense amounts of dust, described by one observer "as if some high-energy disintegration beam or laser had been focused on the towers, and pulverized the concrete into minute particles of ash and dust." Frau Marek told me that she was a former East German physicist and had studied Soviet infrared technology and plasmoids during the 1960s and 1970s. She described having been involved in the demonstration of a Soviet directed-energy beam weapon in 1991 for the U.S. Air Force in Weimar (DDR). She said there was evidence that a beam weapon using "deep infrared" radiation had been used to bring down the WTC. Although I thought Marek's theory was far-fetched, some people are still promoting this theory in spite of the published scientific evidence of super-thermite found by Dr. Steven E. Jones in the dust of the demolished towers.
In the same article I wrote about U.S. and Israeli military efforts, since at least 1995, to develop an advanced infrared beam weapon under a joint "anti-missile" program known as the Tactical High-Energy Laser (THEL) weapon. Although I found Frau Marek's theory interesting, it seemed far-fetched given the abundance of evidence of explosions in the demolition of the towers. Having seen how steel beams and debris were propelled hundreds of feet from the buildings it seemed clear that there had been powerful explosives placed in the towers. Marek's theory was interesting primarily because it was an attempt to explain the mysterious pulverization of the concrete in the floors of the towers. With the discovery of chips of a nano-composite super thermite in the dust, however, the precise cause of the pulverized concrete has now been revealed.
While I had no interest in meeting Frau Marek afterwards, I have been told through our mutual acquaintance that she is always very interested to know where I am. Why, I wondered, would a former agent of the Stasi and the Mossad be interested to know where I am? And why had she provided me with the story about the infrared beam weapon in the first place? Finis Sources and Recommended Reading (clickable): Bollyn, Christopher, "Laser Beam Weapons and the Collapse of the World Trade Center," American Free Press, February 14, 2002 Rapoport, Louis, "Mischa's Back" Jerusalem Post, April 27, 1990
Bono & the Jewish Media Celebrate the Fall of One Wall and Ignore Another
November 5, 2009 THE HYPOCRISY OF CELEBRATING THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL AND IGNORING ISRAEL'S "IRON WALL"
The Berlin Wall fell 20 years ago on November 9-10, 1989. Jewish-owned Music TV (MTV), Bono, and his band U2 will be celebrating along with millions of others the fall of the Berlin Wall while the entire world ignores its hideous cousin, the Israeli "Iron Wall" of separation.
Ze'ev Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism (which became the Likud Party of Menachem Begin, Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert, and Bibi Netanyahu) wrote an article entitled "Iron Wall" in 1923, which called for "Iron Wall" in occupied Palestine: Settlement can thus develop under the protection of a force that is not dependent on the local population, behind an IRON WALL which they will be powerless to break down. Prime Minister Netanyahu's father was Jabotinsky's executive secretary. Likudnik Prime Ministers Sharon, Olmert, and Netanyahu are the builders of Israel's "Iron Wall." Bono, a friend of presidents Bush and Clinton, will be giving a "free" concert at the Brandenburg Gate, the famous 18th Century portal to the city of Berlin. Today, 20 years after reunification, Berlin is the most modern, clean, and civilized metropolis in the world. It is the capital of the most prosperous nation in Europe and the Number One exporter in the world. It's easy for MTV and Bono to celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall 20 years later -- but if they really cared about freedom and equality for all men why don't they do a free concert in occupied-Bethlehem or Jerusalem in front of the wall of the Zionist fortress state of Israel? Why doesn't President Barack Hussein Obama II call on the Israeli leaders to tear down this wall, as President Reagan did to the Soviet leadership? Neither Obama nor Bono would dare to speak out against Israeli apartheid policies or Zionist war crimes because they are owned and controlled by the Zionist Jews who made them what they are.
Born Paul David Hewson, Bono wrote about his mother's Jewish roots in his book U2 by U2: Jack was a travelling salesman, as many of my uncles were, and they come from a long line of travelling salesmen. And in fact I am a travelling salesman. I sell songs for U2, door to door, city to city, and I promote ideas like debt cancellation or fair trade at the market, and I reckon I must have got if from the Rankins -- which, by the way, is usually a Jewish name. They all looked Jewish too. I've heard it said that the Rankins were Jewish at one point when they were based in Scotland, then they came over to Ireland and they weren't Jewish any more, which I think used to happen a lot. I don't know if that is true, but I'd like it if it were. (Source: U2 by U2, p. 15)
Schaefer has been honored by President Johannes Rau in the Bellevue Palace for his offensive painting which desecrates the German flag. In 2007, Schaefer met the Pope, Benedict XVI, in St. Peter's Cathedral at the Vatican. Although average Germans find his painting to be highly offensive and disgusting, it is protected by law. It should be remembered that Germany is still occupied and does not have a peace treaty or a real constitution. The Grundgesetz (the basic law) written by the Allied occupiers, considered as temporary when it was written in 1945, is still in effect. German lands stolen by Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, and Russians are still illegally occupied. The Czech Republic, which just ratified the E.U. Lisbon Treaty, was allowed an "opt out" which permitted the Czech state to maintain the racist Benes Decree which prohibits displaced ethnic Germans from returning to their homes, farms, and property that were stolen during the "ethnic cleansing" of Czechoslovakia after the war. Would a European state be allowed to have laws that prohibit Jews from regaining their property? How can the European Union accept laws that discriminate against Germans? The Zionist ethnic cleansing of the Baltic region and the Sudetenland resulted in the deaths of more than 2 million innocent German civilians. All German property was confiscated and the rightful owners were forced onto boxcars -- or shot. Jews, like Madeleine Albright's father, wound up with the German treasures that had been stolen. The German refugees are the Palestinians of Europe.
Finis
Goldstone Challenges Obama on Israeli War Crimes
October 31, 2009 BERLIN - The Obama administration and U.S. Congress have joined the Zionist campaign to condemn the Goldstone report, a United Nations fact-finding report on the evidence of war crimes committed in Gaza during the Israeli offensive against the largely defenseless civilian population of the Gaza Strip. The overwhelming majority of the Gaza population is Palestinian refugees who were driven from their homes and villages during the Zionist ethnic cleansing of 1948-49. The Israeli offensive, which began during Christmas last year, involved a large number of egregious war crimes being committed by the Israeli military, which was headed by Ehud Barak, a friend and supporter of President Barak Hussein Obama II. Barak would be the first one to be put on trial for the war crimes committed in Gaza. The Washington Post is reporting that Congress will vote to condemn the Goldstone report on Tuesday, November 3. President-elect Obama said he would have plenty to say about the Israeli assault on Gaza once he became president. Thus far he has said nothing. To understand the actions of the Obama administation one has to be aware of the fact that the Obama White House is run by his Zionist handlers, primarily Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, who are controlled by more senior criminals in the organization. Candidate Obama was created by Chicago's arch-Zionist, Philip M. Klutznick, his daughter Betty Lu Salzman, Rahm Emanuel, and David Axelrod. Axelrod's mother was a communist journalist who wrote for the PM newspaper that pushed for the United States to enter the war against Germany in the early 1940s. President Obama will do nothing to cross his Zionist masters, and that includes the war criminals running the state of Israel.
The Washington Post of October 31 is reporting that the House of Representatives will vote on Tuesday on a nonbinding resolution condemning a controversial U.N. report on alleged Israeli war crimes in the Gaza Strip that has become a major complication in Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's diplomacy in the Middle East this weekend. Clinton told the BBC that the report is biased and one-sided. This is a very clear indication that the Obama administration is working to further the Zionist agenda regardless of how many crimes are committed or lives are lost.
While the world celebrates the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Obama administration is helping build the Israeli wall. Two thousand U.S. troops are currently training in Israel to help fortify the fascist militaristic Jewish ghetto in Palestine, which is surrounded by an outrageous separation wall -- paid for and financed by the good people of the United States. To celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall while supporting the apartheid state of Israel is nothing but hypocritical -- and racist.
Richard Goldstone, author of the UN report accusing Israel of serious war crimes and crimes against humanity during its assault on Gaza, has openly challenged the Obama administration to justify its claims that his findings are flawed and biased. ISRAELI ASSAULT "DESIGNED TO TERRORIZE" The UN fact-finding mission headed by Goldstone concluded that the Israeli assault on the civilian population of the Gaza Strip was "a deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and terrorize a civilian population, radically diminish its local economic capacity both to work and to provide for itself, and to force upon it an ever increasing sense of dependency and vulnerability."
The Israeli government is particularly worried because the Goldstone report concluded that the Israeli military, headed by Ehud Barak, committed serious war crimes that constitute a "grave breach" of the Geneva Conventions: From the facts gathered, the Mission found that the following grave breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention were committed by the Israeli armed forces in Gaza: wilful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, and extensive destruction of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly. As grave breaches these acts give rise to individual criminal responsibility. The Mission notes that the use of human shields also constitutes a war crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The Goldstone fact-finding report is extremely important because it puts every law-abiding government on notice that they are obliged under international law to consider the leadership of the Israeli government and military as criminal. This means that people like Ehud Olmert and Ehud Barak should be arrested as soon as they arrive in any country that upholds international law. In the same way that Roman Polanski was arrested in Switzerland, the Israeli political and military leaders should be arrested and held for a war crimes trial. This is what international law demands. If these individuals were to be arrested and interrogated we would also find the truth about who carried out the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.
The UN report on Israeli war crimes during the assault on Gaza is in three parts and can be read by clicking on the following links: Executive Summary Conclusions Complete Report The Goldstone report verifies and validates what I have been saying since the Israeli assault on Gaza began in December 2008: The Israeli military, headed by defense minister Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert, as prime minister, was committing serious war crimes. These crimes, which were witnessed by millions of television viewers, would force the incoming Obama administration to choose between supporting international law on war crimes or the criminal Zionist regime based in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. With Rahm Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist running the White House, it appears that the Obama administration is siding with the criminals Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert, and Shimon Peres.
Sources and Recommended Reading (Note: My articles on Israeli war crimes were stolen when my website Bollyn.info was hijacked in March 2009. The Rebel website has copies of the original articles with the photos.) Ehud Barak - Architect of 9-11, September 11, 2009
Mark Lane, the Liberty Lobby, and the Jonestown Massacre
October 16, 2009 None are so hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes. One of the reasons the American people are unable to resist the Zionist criminal network that controls the U.S. government and media is that the so-called patriotic movement is controlled by the same criminal network. A supporter from Scotland often writes to me asking if I have heard Michael Piper's latest rant against me on the Republic Broadcasting Network. Three years after I was fired from American Free Press where I had submitted articles for six years as an independent contractor, Piper, who is one of that paper's key figures, is still attacking me. Why would Piper, who works for a newspaper that purports to be a publication for patriotic Americans, spend so much time attacking me and my 9-11 research? Who is paying him and ordering him to do this? To understand why Piper acts like a rabid dog requires a better understanding of what American Free Press really is -- and who is behind it. Having raised the subject of the Jewish lawyer/C.I.A. agent Mark Lane and his key role in controlling the Liberty Lobby in my essay "Why Are We Unable to Resist?", the subject of American Free Press (AFP) being a controlled-opposition outfit came up during my October 6 show with R.J. Hender on Republic Broadcasting Network. A caller, "Daniel from Canada", asked if I would now agree that Michael Piper of AFP had been correct in his criticism of Eric Hufschmid. Piper then attacked me on his program on RBN, which led to this email from a listener. I heard a host on RBN railing against you tonight in an incredibly vile manner. [Michael] Collins Piper, I believe, was his name. He was so nasty that right away I found myself sympathizing with you. Anyway, after he got to the gist of his attacks and mentioned that you had accused Mark Lane of being an agent, I was completely won over to you. I have known since 1977 that he was an agent and spent a few years telling anyone who might be interested of that fact. I would remind Collins Piper or anyone who doubts this is true, that Mr. Lane was in Jonestown (CIA mind control project) at the time of the massacre. He survived because he is very well connected to say the least. Keep up the good work.
It should be noted that Michael Piper, who brags about his Jewish ancestors and carries a portfolio from AIPAC, the Israeli lobby in Washington, lies a great deal and does so as a representative of Mark Lane and American Free Press. This behaviour is typical of people who have the backing of an agency like the C.I.A. behind them. Piper lies and slanders with impunity because he has what we call "a license to lie." Piper has been attacking me since December 2001 when I was invited to speak about 9-11 in Moscow. He continues his vicious attacks to this day. He is obviously being paid to do so. Why would a person like Piper be attacking me for my research on 9-11? Why did Piper work to keep me from speaking in Moscow in December 2001 and again at the American Free Press conference held in Washington two weeks after I was attacked and tortured with a TASER by a three-man undercover tactical squad at my home near Chicago?
In a 1979 panel discussion on "Cults and the Law" at the California Bar Association's convention in Los Angeles, Mr. Charles Garry, who was the principal attorney for Jim Jones and his organization, accused Mark Lane of being responsible for the mass deaths. He said Lane had played upon Jones' irrational fears of a United States Government plot against the Jones cult, provoking Mr. Jones into ordering the killings and suicides. "The person responsible was the catalyst," said Mr. Garry. "He may not be legally responsible, but he is morally." In September 1978, unbeknownst to Garry, Lane visited Jim Jones and spoke to the residents of Jonestown, supporting Jones' theories and drawing parallels between Martin Luther King, Jr. and Jim Jones. Lane held press conferences stating that "none of the charges" against the People's Temple "are accurate or true." Lane fed Jones' fear and paranoia saying there was a "massive conspiracy" against the Temple by "intelligence organizations," naming the C.I.A., F.B.I., F.C.C., and even the U.S. Post Office. "EITHER THIS IS THE FUTURE OR THERE WON'T BE ANY" Mark Lane visited Jonestown in September 1978, two months before Jim Jones took 913 of his followers to their gruesome end in the jungle of Guyana. Lane lavished praise on the mind control settlement and its paranoid leader. Lane told the mind-controlled subjects of Jonestown that they had found a better way of life in the jungle with Jones than they could have in the United States. Lane's speech to Jones and his followers from September 1978 was recorded and used in a 1981 National Public Radio (NPR) documentary about Jonestown entitled "Father Cares: The Last of Jonestown." Anthony Lewis wrote about Lane's visit and support of the Jonestown mind control project in a New York Times article entitled "Nightmare Brought to Life" in April 1981: Two months before the Rev. Jim Jones took his followers to their gruesome end in 1978, Jones had a visitor from the United States who praised the settlement and its paranoid leader. People in the United States knew there had to be a better way of life, he said, "and it is here." "AUTHENTIC EVIL" James Reston Jr. visited Jonestown shortly after the massacre and found some nine hundred hours worth of audio tapes made by Jones of his speeches and interviews. Reston, who described Jones as "authentic evil" went on to write a book about Jonestown entitled Our Father Who Art in Hell. These tapes were used to produce the NPR documentary that Anthony Lewis wrote about. Lewis said that Lane's secret visit to Jonestown in September 1978 was a key factor of the "authentic evil":
Less than one month after the mass killing, Lane reportedly travelled to Switzerland with Terri Buford, the business manager of Jonestown, "to remove the secret Zurich assets," according to Robert Havel, spokesman for the U.S. Justice Department. The secret funds, estimated to be as much as $18 million, were never accounted for. Lane denied he had removed the money, saying he had spent 5 days in Paris. MARK LANE & THE LIBERTY LOBBY A few years after the massacre in Jonestown, Lane became the lawyer of Willis A. Carto and the so-called patriotic and anti-Semitic Liberty Lobby. The Liberty Lobby is patriotic in the same way that Jones and the People's Temple was a Christian church. To understand the true nature and real mission of American Free Press we need to examine Mark Lane's key role in running the Liberty Lobby. When we realize that Lane holds the key position as owner of the lobby and its assets, the strange actions of Michael Piper become understandable. This explains Piper's bizarre attacks on me and his strange relationship with Willis A. Carto and his German-born wife, Elisabeth. Piper is working for Mark Lane, not Willis Carto. Mark Lane took over the assets of the Liberty Lobby in or around 1993, when the lobby was on the verge of bankruptcy. This information came directly from L.T. Patterson, the publisher of Criminal Politics, who was sued by Lane in 1994 for some $10 million. Patterson was able to fend off Lane, a Zionist wolf in sheep's clothing, and during the legal process learned that Lane owned the Liberty Lobby. When I asked Willis A. Carto if this was true, he swore at me on the phone and slammed down the receiver. Since my office at the lobby/newspaper was connected to Willis Carto's (from the summer of 2000) and having seen Lane, Carto, and Piper together on many occasions, I don't doubt for a minute that Patterson's information is true. I have never seen anything that would contradict it. This would mean that the so-called right-wing patriotic and anti-Semitic publications of the Liberty Lobby, such as the Spotlight and American Free Press, are actually controlled-opposition outfits controlled by the Zionist Jew, Mark Lane. This explains all the bizarre behavior I observed at the paper during my six years of working with the lobby and its publications.
Lane, it should be noted, was in U.S. Army intelligence in post-war Germany in 1945-47. This is the branch that became the C.I.A. after the war. Lane was paid some $5 million in legal fees by the Liberty Lobby, according to a veteran of the lobby. None of this is widely known among the people who read and support American Free Press. It is important because it shows how a Zionist Jew from the C.I.A. can actually control a movement that purports to be working for the American patriot audience. Lane's controlling role at the Liberty Lobby should be kept in mind when viewing the photos from his visit to Jonestown. Lane was a lawyer for Jim Jones and was present before, during, and after the mass killing.
"It is all swirling around Mark Lane..." Rogers Worthington of the Chicago Tribune wrote that the gruesome events in Jonestown all seemed to revolve around Mark Lane: Through it all is the tantalizing hint that Lane knows still more than he is willing to tell. Indeed, there are moments when events connected to Jonestown and the Peoples Temple seem to revolve around Mark Lane. Six years later, Mark Lane found his place at the so-called patriotic, right-wing, and anti-Semitic Liberty Lobby working for Willis A. Carto. The Jewish lawyer Lane did very well for himself working for the anti-Semitic Willis Carto, so well in fact that with some of the $5 million he received in legal fees for defending the Liberty Lobby he was able to buy the lobby in 1993 and continue sowing fear among gullible Americans. As Anthony Lewis wrote in his 1978 article about Lane entitled "The Mark of Zorro": If another Mark Lane were passing judgment on these activities, he would surely sense a conspiracy to sow doubt and division in the country, to encourage morbid obsessions. I have always assumed that he was just a pitchman with an exceptional talent for preying on the gullible. One would have to be extremely naive to think that Mark Lane was nothing more than that.
Sources and Recommended Reading (linked to original news articles): Binder, David, "Reports Conflict on Status of Jones Cult's Finances," New York Times, December 16, 1978 Crewdson, John M., "Mark Lane and People's Temple: A Cause to Back, Then Condemn," New York Times, February 4, 1979 "Fellow Lawyer Accuses Mark Lane in Jonestown Deaths," New York Times, September 21, 1979 "Jones Cult's Fortune is $18 Million - and Climbing," Chicago Tribune, December 24, 1978 Lewis, Anthony, "Nightmare Brought to Life," New York Times, April 23, 1981 Lewis, Anthony, "The Mark of Zorro," New York Times, November 30, 1978 Worthington, Rogers , "Guyana tragedy puts lawyer Lane back in the limelight," Chicago Tribune, December 26, 1978
Why Are We Unable to Resist?
Updated: October 20, 2009
Having grown up during the Vietnam War, I was immersed in the protest movement and vibrant anti-war music and culture of the 1960s. "Lucky Man" by Emerson, Lake, and Palmer is a good example of the anti-war music of the time. I find it odd that there is no similar anti-war movement or music today. Faced with never-ending wars in the Middle East, today's youth seem completely apathetic and apolitical.
During the years that I attended public school, the United States was engaged in an undeclared war of aggression in Southeast Asia that nobody really understood. Every week, the American people saw actual photos from the war in LIFE magazine and could easily see through the deception that we were fighting "communism". After 8 years of war in Afghanistan and 18 years in Iraq, however, there is no similar photo-journalism of comparable quality coming from the "embedded" journalists covering these wars. Likewise, there is virtually no anti-war music or protest movement against the criminal wars being fought in our name. Why? We have to look at the media to understand the lack of a similar anti-war movement in the United States. Today, there is no mass resistance because the U.S. media is now completely owned and controlled by Zionist Jews who actually support the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the illegal wars being fought by the United States and its allies. These wars are being waged to benefit Israel and strengthen the Zionist hegemony in the Middle East and Central Asia. The Zionist-controlled mass media in the United States now works full time to promote the war agenda - first Afghanistan, then Iraq, and now Iran. In the Zionist-controlled media there is no room for any real criticism of the Zionist war agenda. Paul Wolfowitz, one of the senior U.S. officials who conspired and planned the wars of aggression against both Afghanistan and Iraq, is now pushing for war against Iran in the pages of the Financial Times (U.K.), for example. It needs to be understood that Wolfowitz is guilty of the most serious war crime, "a crime against peace" as defined by the Nuremberg Principles. That his opinion is published in a leading financial paper illustrates my point that the mass media actively promotes the Zionist war agenda. Wolfowitz has strong connections to the state of Israel. He lived in Israel as a teenager when his Polish-born father, Jacob, worked at the Technion, and his sister, Laura, married an Israeli and lives in Jerusalem. The controlled media today censors and sanitizes the images and information about the wars and the human suffering the aggression has caused to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan. The public is kept in the dark about the true costs of the illegal wars, both human and financial. Most importantly, the U.S. media keeps powerful images like these from the Vietnam and Iraq wars off the pages of our newspapers.
After nearly 19 years of fighting and bombing Iraqis, very few images of the human cost of the war have been published. The ones that have been seen are horrible beyond belief and reveal the criminal nature of the war of aggression.
The Vietnam war was being fought, we were told, to keep Southeast Asia from falling to the communists. Thousands of young men, including several of my relatives, went to Vietnam to fight "communism". Many thousands of young Americans died in Viet Nam. An untold number of Vietnamese died.
Petherick fired me after a three-man team of heavily-armed undercover police broke my arm and TASERed me in front of my family, but only after collecting many thousands of dollars from readers for the Bollyn "legal defense fund," which were kept by the so-called employee owned newspaper. I later discovered that the newspaper and the organization behind it, the Liberty Lobby, are actually owned by the Jewish leftist lawyer, Mark Lane, and have been since the early 1990s when he bought the assets of Liberty Lobby with some of the $5 million he had been paid by Willis A. Carto in legal fees. I learned this from L.T. Patterson, publisher of Criminal Politics of Cincinnati. Patterson's newsletter is similar to the publications of the Mark Lane's Liberty Lobby, which is what led Lane to sue Patterson in the mid-1990s for some $10 million. Lane, a Zionist Jew, wanted to have a monopoly in the patriotic newspaper business. During the legal process Patterson learned that Lane had acquired the assets of the nearly bankrupt Liberty Lobby in the early 1990s. Manfred Roeder, a German patriot who has been imprisoned often in occupied Germany, told me that such controlled opposition newspapers like National Zeitung are designed to skim the cream off of the nationalist movement. They also serve as outlets of disinformation and have even more sinister purposes.
As the U.S. prepared for war in Kuwait and Iraq in the summer of 1990, I began organizing pro-Palestinian students at the University of California at Santa Cruz who were opposed to the war effort. I learned a great deal through my anti-war efforts. I saw how the anti-war movement was taken over by Jewish students from the Hillel organization (B'nai B'rith). The issue of occupied Palestine was pushed to the side. This is what controlled opposition means: controlling both sides of the debate to control the message. James B. Phillips, a devout Catholic and dear friend from Chicago who served in Vietnam, recently sent me a video from the mid-1980s that explains how Americans have been demoralized and why.
The information comes from a former agent of the Soviet K.G.B. who defected to the United States.
As the former Soviet journalist Yuri Bezmenov says in the video clip about the KGB's demoralization of American youth through the media, "Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate and open. You can see it with your own eyes.... It has nothing to do with espionage... in reality the main emphasis of the KGB is NOT in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85 percent is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American [so] that despite the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country." Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fact and should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way. Zionist Jews control nearly all of the U.S. mass media: television and radio networks, major newspapers, book publishers and leading book stores, and the big film studios and chains of movie theatres. They have taken control of the media for one reason - to manipulate public opinion by controlling the message. It is the same with media as with pipelines: He who owns the pipeline controls the product. Many of the Jewish media moguls are members of the secret organization of Freemasons, the International Order of B'nai B'rith. Philip Morris Klutznick, the man who made Obama president, was the international president of B'nai B'rith. The Sulzberger family who owns the New York Times was one of the founding families of Lodge No. 1 of the B'nai B'rith, which was started in New York City in 1843. It is through this secret society, which is closed to all non-Jews, that the media moguls and Jewish financiers are able to conspire against the American people while living among them. The B'nai B'rith also started the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in the early 1900s. The ADL is an organization that protects the Jewish criminal network by attacking those who expose their crimes. The ADL has infiltrated police departments across the United States. The B'nai B'rith also runs Hillel, an organization for promoting the Zionist agenda at every college campus in the United States. Through their organizations like the ADL and Hillel, the secretive Elders of Zion of the B'nai B'rith are able to push their agenda into every community and college campus in America. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is certainly not a "hoary fake", and is most likely the protocols from a meeting of the leaders of the B'nai B'rith. Bezmenov's statement about the KGB being primarily occupied with disinformation and demoralization efforts aimed at Americans through the media is similar to the analysis by the German intelligence expert, Andreas von Bülow, who told me that 90 percent of the work done by the CIA and other intelligence agencies is disinformation and deception. It needs to be understood that communism and Zionism are fraternal twins from the same mother -- big Jewish capital of the Rothschild sort. This relationship can be seen in Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, the most senior advisers of President Barack Hussein Obama II. Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist, and Axelrod, the son of Jewish communists, were commissioned in 1992 by the daughter of Jewish financier Philip Morris Klutznick of Chicago to make Obama our "first black president." Zionism and communism are two heads of the same evil beast. Communism and Zionism emerged together in the Russian Empire in the late 1800s. There were six communist parties, two of which were also Zionist. Although the Rothschild family who created the state of Israel is capitalist, the Russian Jews who emigrated to Palestine in the late 1800s and early 1900s were ardent communists and socialists. Most of the Ashkenazi (Khazar and Slavic) Jews who built the Zionist state and who run it to this day come from the communist and Zionist parties that created the kibbutz and moshav settlements in Palestine. The Jews who were forced to emigrate to Palestine (later Israel) and the millions of people who have lived under communism are similar. Zionists and communists are both merely the pawns of the Rothschilds; foot soldiers for international Jewish bankers. To be continued...
Made in Israel: Obama Decision on Missile Shield
September 19, 2009 The sudden decision by the President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama II, to abandon the proposed U.S. "missile shield" to be based in Poland and the Czech Republic, was actually made by Israeli military and political leaders - primarily President Shimon Peres and Minister of Defense Ehud Barak. The decision to abort the proposed anti-Iranian missile defense system is the most obvious quid pro quo given by Israeli leaders to their Russian counterparts during impromptu summits in Russia in the aftermath of the Arctic Sea intrigue. In exchange for Moscow's support to keep Iran from obtaining an anti-aircraft missile system and assistance to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear nation, the Israeli leaders promised to use their influence in Washington to abort the proposed U.S. missile shield which was seen as a threat to Russia, although such a system is not ready to be deployed and was probably just a bluff meant to antagonize the Kremlin. THE ARCTIC SEA INTRIGUE The hijacking of the Arctic Sea in July and August apparently played a key role in the Obama administration's "decision" to abort the missile defense shield in Eastern Europe. Sources in Tel Aviv and Moscow told the Sunday Times that the Arctic Sea had been loaded with S-300 missiles, Russia’s most advanced anti-aircraft weapon, while supposedly undergoing repairs in the Russian port of Kaliningrad. The missiles had reportedly been sold to Iran by former military officers linked to the underworld, according to the Times. But what did Peres really offer in return for Russian cooperation on Iran? There must have been something much more substantial to warrant secret Israeli summits in Russia. It certainly looks like the proposed U.S. "missile shield" in Poland and the Czech Republic was the key element of the Israeli deal although the missile system was far from being realized and appears to have been more of a bluff. OBAMA'S "DECISION" In what could shape a major geopolitical realignment, the White House is scrapping a key irritant in the soured U.S.-Russian relationship — the Bush-era plan for a missile defense shield in Poland and the Czech Republic. But who did the "deep bargaining" with Russia that resulted in Obama's announcement? Henry Kissinger hasn't been to Russia lately, nor has Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The most recent summits were between the Israeli leaders, close friends of Rahm Emanuel's family, and the Russian leadership. Following the impromptu Israeli-Russian summits, senior Russian officials announced that they do not support a nuclear-armed Iran. This was followed by the sudden decision to abort the missile defense system announced by President Barack Hussein Obama II. Seeing that Obama is controlled by the Zionist agent Rahm Emanuel, the Israeli connection could hardly be more obvious.
Bernadotte was serving as the UN envoy to Palestine following the disastrous partition plan of 1947 which cut the Holy Land into pieces for the Jewish immigrants and the native Palestinian population. This was the devilish UN scheme that gave Russian Zionists a foothold in Palestine. The Palestinians, who under the British Mandate had been forced to accept large numbers of atheist communist Jews to settle in the Holy Land, then lost everything during the Zionist ethnic cleaning in 1948 in which some 400 Palestinian villages and towns were erased from the map. As the Yiddish (Eastern European) saying goes: Give a pig a finger - it'll take your whole hand. Recommended Reading and Sources: Bollyn, "Obama and the Jews," April 21, 2009 "HIGH SEAS: Uranium: The Israeli Connection", Time, May 30, 1977 "Missing channel pirate ship carried Russian arms for Iran," The Sunday Times (London), September 6, 2009 Ravid, Barak, "PM's secret Moscow visit was part of campaign against missile sales to Iran," Ha'aretz, September 11, 2009
Ehud Barak - Architect of 9-11
September 11, 2009 Eight years after 9-11, the American people and the U.S. government are still woefully misinformed about what actually happened on September 11, 2001. The media version of events, accepted by most Americans, is based on a completely false understanding of the terror atrocity that changed America – and the world. This is, however, no accident. This is how Israeli false-flag terrorism is designed to work.
The Israeli leaders Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak were among the very first people to blame Osama Bin Laden for 9-11 and call for military action against the Taliban-led regime in Afghanistan. The false-flag attacks were designed and then used by these Israeli leaders to start their long-planned "War on Terror," an Israeli military strategy pushed by Netanyahu for many years. The U.S. military presence in Afghanistan and Iraq allows Israel to carry out covert murderous false-flag terror operations in these beleaguered nations, acts that are effectively disguised as "sectarian" violence by the Zionist-controlled media.
Barak is known for heading the military response to the 1972 hijacking of a Sabena Airlines jet, which was forced by four terrorists to land at Israel's Lod Airport outside Tel Aviv. Barak led a team of Sayeret commandos, dressed in mechanics' overalls, which approached the plane as if to refuel it and then stormed inside. Barak's commandos overpowered the hijackers and rescued the passengers. One of the men under Barak's command was Benjamin Netanyahu. "Bibi was a good young officer," Barak acknowledged to Serge Schmemann of the New York Times (May 21, 1996), referring to Netanyahu by his nickname. "I tried to convince him to stay in the army longer. He was good at that, but that does not make him an appropriate [person] to run the country."
Benjamin Netanyahu, another former Israeli prime minister, actually told the New York Times that the terror attacks were "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations on 9-11. He also "called upon all democratic nations of the world to join an international coalition to crush the terrorist organizations and the regimes that sponsor them," according to the Jerusalem Post of 12 September 2001. This military response is the pre-planned Israeli strategy known as the "War on Terror," which Netanyahu has been pushing since 1986 in his books, articles, and speeches. "We must build a coalition against terror today, when our power is unmatched, because tomorrow it could be matched," Netanyahu said in a news conference at Jerusalem's King David Hotel. "It's time to take on militant Islamic regimes with a great deal of strength. We should crush the terrorist infrastructure that threatens the entire free world." Barak was ready with an editorial entitled "Democratic unity is the only answer to terrorism," published in The Times of London on 13 September 2001: Terrorism has declared war on the free world and the free world must unite to fight back. This is the inevitable conclusion to be drawn from the horror of Tuesday's attack. Just as the enlightened world mobilised in the past to combat challenges to its core values, so must such an international coalition be built today … Ehud Barak certainly knows who "the attackers are." He sees the chief architect of 9-11 every time he looks in the mirror.
Recommended Reading:
We Are Not Afraid
September 7, 2009 We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people. Eight years have passed since the terror atrocities of September 11, 2001, heinous false-flag terror crimes which took the lives of thousands of innocent people and led to drastic changes in the United States and around the world. Although the terror attacks have yet to be properly investigated and prosecuted by the federal government, we now have scientific evidence that proves that the official explanation is nothing but a pack of lies, a massive deception foisted on the public by corrupt government officials and the controlled media. Most significantly, this deception was promoted by officials and media owners who knew it to be false. The U.S. Department of Justice, for example, oversaw the destruction of many tons of structural steel - crucial evidence from the crime scenes. This is the preface to the author's online book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.
Bollyn's 9/11 Book Online
September 12, 2009 Comments from readers of my book online: Dear Christopher, I've been in this website for 2 days now, it's fascinating, and it answers so many questions for me and it all makes sense. Sort of like the puzzle came together. I totally admire your strength and courage. It takes a special person to expose this sort of thing, and I truly hope it all works out for you and you get justice for what was done to you. May God bless you. My book about 9-11 is available online and can be read and printed out for free, which I recommend doing. The first fourteen chapters and 134 historical articles about are now online under Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. The chapters have all been carefully edited and proof-read by an American editor. A key chapter, "The Architecture of Terror" (Chapter VII) was scrutinized by an independent fact-checker in Britain (who is critical of my thesis) and passed without a single error. More than one hundred points were checked. Every single point was found to be correct. HOW TO PRINT THE CHAPTERS The bold blue chapter titles in the Table of Contents are clickable and bring the reader to the specific chapter. Each chapter has a print icon in the top right corner for the print-friendly format to facilitate printing each chapter separately. The bold blue heading title for each year of articles is also clickable and brings one to the complete set of articles for that year in chronological order. These articles may also be found by going to the 9-11 section on this website. These articles make up the second half of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. I will be adding illustrations and giving each article its own URL. The articles, which are historical and essential reading to understand the book can be read in chronological order by clicking on the 9-11 section in the left-hand margin. The article files are laid out in a way to facilitate printing them out, which is a good idea. I strongly recommend that readers print out the chapters and articles and put them in a three-ring binder. This will facilitate reading and studying the material. I look forward to the day I will be able to see the book in print and available in the public libraries of the United States. I certainly intend to see this atrocious crime solved, the criminals exposed, and my book published. Thank you for your support.
The Exploding Floors of 9-11 & New Video of WTC Demolitions
September 3, 2009 The Exploding Floors of 9-11 This newly released footage of the demolitions of WTC 7 and WTC 1 (North Tower) is very significant. There are several important aspects of the demolitions of 9-11 that are proven by these videos. The first is the incredible amount of pulverization of the concrete in WTC 7, which can be seen in the billowing pyroclastic clouds of dust rolling down the streets during its unexplained collapse at 5:25 p.m. on 9-11. Pyroclastic clouds are usually associated with volcanoes and are composed chiefly of rock fragments of explosive origin.
The dust clouds seen flowing down the street following the collapse of the 47-story Salomon Building, built and owned by Larry Silverstein, are identical to the pyroclastic clouds that accompanied the demolition and collapses of the Twin Towers, WTC 1 and 2. These dust clouds were caused by a super-explosive, a nano-composite form of thermite, fragments of which were found in the dust and identified by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University and others.
This is the incredibly powerful explosive that evidently pulverized the 110 four-inch thick light-weight concrete floors of each tower. Besides reducing these concrete layers to pyroclastic dust, this super-thermite also destroyed everything on each floor and blew everything to smithereens and propelled the huge dust clouds of pulverized debris down the streets of lower Manhattan. The floors of the Twin Towers were exploded in a way that indicates that the super-thermite must have been in direct contact with the four-inch thick concrete floors or the metal pans the concrete was poured into. This is fairly obvious because these structures were primarily steel and glass towers with concrete floors. The only other surfaces would have been the temporary dry wall constructions on each floor, the suspended ceilings, plumbing, and elevator shafts. There was not much else in the way of surfaces that could have been applied with super-thermite. This is crucial evidence that helps explain how the towers were demolished. The floors and structures around the core were evidently exploded first - and then the core columns were cut with steel-cutting thermite charges, explosions that were shrouded by the dust and noise of the exploding floors. This is quite unlike the logical progression of a normal collapse even in the case of demolition. This is to say that the 47 weight-bearing core columns were not cut first leading to the collapses. The destruction of the Twin Towers were not really collapses although the demolition of WTC 7 resulted in a collapse that resembled a normal controlled demolition. The 110 floors of each tower were simply exploded before, blowing downwards and away from the cores in a way that was designed to look like a collapse. There was one problem: the "collapses" fell faster than an object in free fall. This was the first solid piece of evidence that the towers had been demolished with explosives. The "collapses" occurred faster than the laws of physics allow -- because they were not natural collapses. If they had been natural collapses there would have been layers of concrete pancaked on top of each other in the rubble pile, which is what often happens to multi-level buildings in strong earthquakes. We would expect to find 110 slabs of concrete and their steel pans stacked on top of each other, yet there is no evidence that any of these floor pans were found in the rubble, much less 110 of them stacked up. Where did these 220 steel floor pans go? How could they have simply disappeared? The fact that they were not found stacked up in the rubble clearly disproves the official version (NIST) of the "collapses" of the Twin Towers.
As we know there were no such solid remains of floor pans or the concrete floors of the Twin Towers -- absolutely everything was reduced to dust, except for the structural steel that remained, although some of that was also vaporized. This is what the super-thermite did on 9-11. It exploded the concrete floors and everything on them. There was no so-called pancake collapse. This is certainly obvious to anyone who views these videos. Why have NIST and the media lied to the public that the demolitions were collapses caused by steel structures weakened by fire? This is pure rubbish. During the interview, you speculated that the nano thermite may have been sprayed on the floor during the asbestos abatement process while removing linoleum. Not to put too fine a point on it, but the asbestos abatement process would be removing the fireproofing from the floor trusses by accessing the trusses through the suspended ceiling located below. In other words, the sol jell could have been sprayed on the floor pans (which is 15-20 ga steel decking supported by the trusses that the concrete is poured in) and hidden by the ceiling tiles in the same day. No problem. Other areas of sol jell application would include the core columns located within the elevator shafts Ace Elevator was working on. If you think about it, as energetic as nano thermite is, relatively little sol jell would be needed for the exterior columns, and it would explain the shearing occurring at convenient truck size lengths. It seems most likely that the undersides of the steel floor pans is where the super-thermite was applied. If the pans were sprayed with a layer of super-thermite disguised as a coating of rust-proofing for example, the force of the blast would be directed downwards. The steel pan and the concrete of the floor would be pulverized but the direction of the explosions would be downwards and outwards, which is what we see in the video. As each floor was detonated, the blast would be forced downwards by the steel and concrete above it. The blast would hit the floor below it and hasten the collapse. This is what seems to have occurred judging by the video evidence. In my article, "Who Put Super-Thermite in the Twin Towers?" of July 20, 2009, I discuss how the super-thermite might have been put in the towers. One of the possible disguises for applying the thin layer of super-thermite could have been as a coating sprayed during asbestos abatement work in the towers, as the reader said in the comment above. As I wrote in this article: We do know that a million-dollar contract for asbestos abatement in the twin towers had been put up for bids by contractors in the fall of 2000, exactly one year before 9-11: Kevin Barrett asked me how I can say that the super-thermite was produced by the Zionists who I allege are behind 9-11? As I said in the interview, at this point I cannot say with absolute certainty that the nano-composite was made by Israeli scientists in the nuclear bomb factory near Dimona, but I suspect it was. It is a deduction I have made in the same way one solves an algebra problem. If we know the result of the equation and all of the factors except one we can determine the missing factor. This is what I have done. Every other aspect of this false-flag terror atrocity was done by Israelis or Zionists committed to Israel so I would conclude that Israelis were involved in the manufacture and application of the super-thermite in the World Trade Center towers that were demolished on 9-11, all three of them. Add comment Israel's Super-Thermite Lab
August 26, 2009
The thesis of my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, is that a small gang of high-level Zionist extremists carried out 9-11. This group centers around the senior Israeli terrorist, Shimon Peres, who is currently president of Israel. This group includes other Israeli leaders, such as the former Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, and the current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. It also includes the Israeli minister of defense, Ehud Barak, and other less well known members of Israel's military intelligence establishment. Former Mossad officers, especially people like Arnon Milchan, who have been involved in building Israel's nuclear weapons arsenal with Shimon Peres, are also included.
The crime of 9-11 is still very much at the center of the political stage. It is the real reason why the Zionist-controlled Barack Obama is president of the United States and why the 86-year-old Shimon Peres is president of Israel. The lie has to be defended to protect the real criminals. Shimon Peres, the father of Israel's nuclear arsenal, and the Zionist criminals who helped him build nuclear weapons in the Negev Desert are at the very center of the false-flag terrorism and deception of 9-11. Peres' friends and Mossad agents like Arnon Milchan, Rafi Eitan, Zvi Malkin, and Avraham Ben-Dor played crucial roles in both 9-11 and the creation of Israel's nukes. This is not merely coincidence. These Zionist criminals are ruthless but they are not stupid. The most obvious questions are: Why did they do it? How did they think they could get away with it? The main reason for 9-11 was to change the military equation in the Middle East and bring the United States and NATO into the region on a permanent basis to wage war against the foes of Israel. But how could they possibly think they would get away with such an audacious and heinous crime of false-flag terrorism? Ariel Sharon, then prime minister, expressed the Israeli thinking when he told Shimon Peres, "We control America." The Israelis would not attempt such an outrageous crime without knowing that every aspect of the cover-up was under their control. As my book describes, the Zionists controlled every nodal point of the 9-11 cover-up. Michael Chertoff, an Israeli and the son of a Mossad agent, controlled the non-investigation and oversaw the destruction of the crucial evidence. The Zionist-owned media, particularly the New York media, Fox News, CNN/Time Warner, and the BBC have all participated in the cover-up and false interpretation of the events of 9-11. A devoted supporter of Israel, Alvin K. Hellerstein, has controlled all of the litigation that concerns the victims of 9-11. Lastly, Zionist agents control the White House and U.S. Congress. The Israelis figured that they had all the bases covered. Having staged many similar terror attacks in Israel, they figured they could get away with the big job in New York City on 9-11. They knew that most Americans would never suspect Israel of being behind such an outrageous crime. What they didn't expect is that a few Americans would dig into the evidence and uncover every stone to find the real culprits. They certainly didn't expect that a careful and independent scientific analysis of the dust would reveal that a nano-composite form of super-thermite was used to pulverize the World Trade Center. We know that Osama Bin Laden did not have super-thermite, so who put tens of tons of the powerful nano-tech explosive in the Twin Towers? That is the crucial question that will reveal the true culprits of 9-11. The discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers exposes the hoax of 9-11. Whoever made this advanced nano-tech explosive film had access to the most advanced nano-technology in the world. It certainly was not a gang of Moslem terrorists.
Israel's secret and super-secure nuclear lab is where the extremely powerful super-thermite of 9-11 was designed. The chief scientists involved in the manufacturing of the nano-composite used to pulverize the World Trade Center on 9-11 will be named in a forthcoming article in this space.
To support my research click on the Donation button or send a PayPal donation (as a "Gift") to bollyn@bollynbooks.com
Support Bollyn.com Today
August 10, 2009 Thank you for your well-researched articles. In your case the pen is indeed mightier than the sword. On Bollyn.com you will find essential information about 9-11 and other issues of critical importance that you simply will not find in the mainstream media or news websites. I am not a one-issue writer, but I am focused on the event that changed America. I am dedicated to solving 9-11 because exposing the people behind this heinous crime reveals who is behind the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I need your support to do this research. A great deal of time goes into each article and my work is sponsored only by donations from readers like you. Your contribution will help me continue to produce important and interesting articles about the things that really matter. Any amount will help; your support is greatly appreciated. Without your support this work cannot continue, it's that simple. Christopher Bollyn
Bollyn Notifies Hufschmid of Legal Action
To: Eric Hufschmid
Recipe for Making Super Thermite
My article, "Recipe for Making Super Thermite" is in the 9-11 section and can be read at: http://www.bollyn.com/911#article_11253
ELBIT: The Hellerstein Connection to 9-11
August 3, 2009 We should have lost our memories as well as our voices, were it as easy to forget as to be silent.
The Hellerstein (Gelerstein, Glersztejn, etc.) family is a devout orthodox Jewish family from the fecund Zionist swamps of WHO IS HELLERSTEIN? Judge Hellerstein is a well known Zionist but who is Ran Hellerstein? He is an Israeli military designer, one of the key people running the Israeli military company Elbit. All of the key players of Elbit have been with the company since the 1980s. They don't change any of the people at the top. Here is what Elbit says about Ran: Ran Hellerstein, age 58 Ran Hellerstein was appointed as Executive Vice President and Co-General Manager - Aerospace Division in April 2008 after serving as Corporate Vice President and Co-General Manager - Aircraft and Helmet Systems since 2003. Mr. Hellerstein served as Corporate Vice President and Co-General Manager - Aircraft and Helicopter Upgrades and Systems from 2000 until 2003. From 1996 until 2000, he served as Vice President - Development and Engineering Division, having served as Division Manager since 1993. Mr. Hellerstein joined Elbit Ltd. in 1978 and served in various management positions, including Manager of EDS' Engineering Division, department manager, technical manager and systems engineer. Mr. Hellerstein holds bachelor and master of science degrees in electrical engineering from the Technion. Hellerstein is an unusual name and I have been looking into the family connections between Ran Hellerstein and Alvin K. Hellerstein. I have already written a great deal about the fact that Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein's sister and son both emigrated from In my research of the Hellersteins and Elbit, I came across a very interesting bit of news about the "Danish" anti-Islamic cartoon scandal caused by Flemming Rose. What I found was that Flemming Rose went to
The following Jerusalem Post note about Flemming Rose's recent speech in Israel reveals the true source and motivation of his anti-Islamic cartoons: What are the limits of freedom of expression? Where do people draw red lines - or don't they? Flemming Rose, the cultural editor of the Danish daily newspaper Jyllands Posten, who published the offensive cartoons of the prophet Mohammed that pushed the buttons of many believers in the Muslim world, will discuss the issue today, Wednesday, at 5 p.m., at a symposium in the Handler Auditorium of the Truman Institute on the Mount Scopus campus of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The program is provocatively titled: "Freedom of Expression - Victim of Religion?" Other speakers are David Horovitz, editor-in-chief of The Jerusalem Post, and Michel Kishka, editorial cartoonist and lecturer at the Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design. Moderator will be former Mossad chief Efraim Halevy, who is currently head of the
(Note – Efraim Halevy was head of Mossad from 1998-2002 and now works for Michael Federmann, owner of Federmann Enterprises and the largest shareholder of Elbit.) Source: Serving up the bread of affliction
Is 9-11 Judge Hellerstein Working for Israel? October 23, 2007 How "Jewish" Zionists Fuel Hostility to Muslims, January 2, 2006 Why the European Press is Provoking Muslims, February 3, 2006 ELRON - VOXEO: The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies the The Absence of Justice for 9/11 Victims, March 20, 2007 9/11 – 7 Years After, September 12, 2008 Who Put Super-Thermite in the
Busted: The Orthodox Criminal Network
July 27, 2009
The FBI's mass arrest on July 23 of Orthodox rabbis, their partners-in-crime, and the venal and corrupt politicians who accepted bribes from a Jewish gangster-turned-witness provides essential insight into the extensive Othodox Jewish criminal network that dominates "TERRIBLE BLASPHEMY" This is a very important story, not only for the insular and segregated Orthodox Jewish community in which this criminal network operates but for the larger intercommunal relationship between Jews and the U.S. general public, which is incensed and indignant about being ripped off for hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars by notorious Jews like Bernard Madoff, Maurice Greenberg of A.I.G., and Ben Shalom Bernanke of the Federal Reserve. "If the charges against the rabbis are proved to have been correct," one veteran Brooklyn rabbi told the Israeli press, "it'll be the worst and most terrible blasphemy that will ever be remembered about the New York Jews." While the controlled media wrongly puts the focus on the corrupt minor politicians who allegedly took bribes, the real crooks are those who paid the bribes and used dirty money to corrupt politicians. The main players in this criminal network are among the leading members of the Sephardic Jewish community of
Israeli members of this Syrian Orthodox Jewish community are discussed in my articles about the secret visit of Ehud Olmert to The tiny Syrian Jewish enclave of Deal, The Dwek and Kassin families are very close and have been since at least the early years of the 1900s when they studied Talmud and Kabbalah together in the yeshiva in "WE DON'T WANT GENTILE CHARACTERISTICS" The Syrian Jewish community is known for its strict racial Edict that acts like "an invisible fence" and bans members of the community from marrying anyone outside of the community. "Never accept a convert or a child born of a convert," the son of rabbi Kassin told Zev Chavets of the New York Times in 2007, summarizing the message of the Edict. "Push them away with strong hands from our community. Why? Because we don't want gentile characteristics." To understand the ties between the key families in this story, I recommend Sarina Roffé's articles on the Kassin and Labaton rabbinic dynasties. Sarina is an expert on Syrian Jewry and a member of Brooklyn's Syrian Jewish community and the Jewish Genealogical Society, Inc. of The "Syrian" Jewish community is well known for its notorious criminals. One of the most infamous is Eddie Antar, a.k.a. Crazy Eddie. In the '70s, he created an empire in the home electronics business. When he was caught defrauding investors of nearly $100 million dollars, he fled to Small, tight-knit communities such as the Syrian Jewish enclave in ORTHODOX RABBIS = CRIME BOSSES The most obvious question that a person would ask after hearing the report of the mass arrest of Orthodox rabbis: What kind of religious community is this Orthodox Jewish community in which its leaders are venal crooks who engage in serious criminal activity as easily as one drinks a glass of water? "These rings, led by clergymen, cloaked their extensive criminal activities behind a facade of rectitude," New Jersey District Attorney Ralph Marra said, describing a disgraceful picture of religious leaders heading money-laundering crews and acting as crime bosses. They moved "at least tens of millions of dollars through charitable, nonprofit entities controlled by rabbis in
"Religious leaders allegedly acted like 'crime bosses'", was the Marra quote that became the title of a July 26 article in the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz. "For these defendants, corruption was a way of life." Israelis, however, are well aware of the gangster methods and tactics of the Orthodox Jewish community, something most Americans are only becoming aware of as a result of this mass arrest. Small Orthodox Jewish parties, such as Israel's theocratic Shas Party, have long wielded enormous clout in Israel's coalition governments and used political extortion to obtain special privileges for the Orthodox community. Orthodox religious practices and conversions, for example, are the only ones recognized in the "Jewish state." The Shas party's seed money was raised in rabbi Kassin's living room in Deal, N.J., in the early '80s. In most cases the indicted rabbis used Jewish and Zionist "charitable organizations" to launder money that they believed came from bank fraud and selling counterfeit goods. Dwek told the rabbis he was trying to hide large amounts of cash. In some instances, he said, the money came from the sale of fake Gucci bags. It should be noted, however, that the Orthodox Jewish community has a long and documented history of involvement in the sale of narcotics and illegal drugs, such as Ecstasy. The Syrian Jewish community is very powerful in A Brooklyn Jewish man, Levy Izhak Rosenbaum, is charged with enticing poor people in The arrest of the Orthodox rabbis led some to dub the affair "Kosher Nostra." The rabbis, including two synagogue leaders, are suspected of organizing a money-laundering network that allegedly worked through charities in Deal, Brooklyn and |
