|
|
|
|
|
Home
Why We Must End the 9-11 Deception
June 15, 2013
It was in Iraq that I really felt that the media, generally, conspired to ignore the truth and the facts on the ground. Not ideas and opinions, but facts on the ground. We live in a dirty and dangerous world. There are some things the general public does not need to know, and shouldn't. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows. Most Americans would agree that 9-11 changed the nation, especially the relationship between the citizen and the state. What a person thinks or feels about how America has changed in the 12 years since 9-11 depends very much on what a person believes - and knows - about the events of 9-11. Roughly half the American population believes the government and media version of what happened on 9-11. If you truly believe what George W. Bush and Barack Obama have said about the terror atrocity then you probably support the things they have done as a result. This would mean supporting the so-called “War on Terror” with the very costly U.S. invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the military interventions in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and elsewhere. Defense spending since 2001 has more than doubled, going from $300 billion to more than $700 billion per year.
But, again, if you believe what Bush and Obama have said about the need to fight terrorism, then you probably think these wars and defense spending were necessary. In the same post-9/11 train that gave us the “War on Terror” came the USA PATRIOT Act, the off-shore military detention facility in Guantanamo, Cuba, intrusive inspections of travelers, and the increased surveillance of the American people, their phone calls, and private communications. Again, if you believe the government story about 9-11 then you probably agree that such things are necessary for our security.
If, on the other hand, you are in the other half of the population that does not believe the government version of 9-11 then you are also probably pretty skeptical about the reasons given for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In this case, you probably also have very serious doubts and reservations about the PATRIOT Act, the full-body scans given to people at U.S. airports, and the massive collection of our phone data and Internet records by the NSA.
After all, a person who is skeptical of the government explanation of 9-11 is probably equally skeptical of the need to detain people for years on end in places like Gitmo where more than half the detainees are currently engaged in a hunger strike to protest their illegal detention. Many of these detainees are being force-fed, which is legally considered to be a form of torture. If you are skeptical about what the government says about 9-11 then you are bound to be equally skeptical of the things the government has done based on its seriously flawed explanation of events. If you are among the 40 percent of the American population that is not satisfied with the government explanation of 9-11 and believes there has been a cover up by the government, then you would probably agree that the government has intentionally deceived the American people and is involved in a massive fraud of historic proportions. In this case, you probably think that most of the things the government has done as a result of 9-11 are equally fraudulent. The thing that separates these two groups of people: those who believe the government version and those who don’t, is really how much they know about 9-11. For example, five years after 9-11, in 2006, 43 percent of the American population was unaware that there was a third skyscraper that collapsed on 9-11: Larry Silverstein’s 47-story WTC 7.
Likewise, about half the population believes that Saddam Hussein of Iraq was involved in 9-11 although there is no evidence to support this. This means that nearly half the American population really has very little understanding of what really happened on 9-11. The same percentage of the population that has no idea of what happened on 9-11 also believes that there has been no cover-up. On the other hand, the number of people who are aware of the mysterious collapse of WTC 7 is about the same as the number of people who think there has been a cover-up. This means that the more people know about 9-11, the more likely they are to realize that the government has lied about what happened. This is where my Solving 9-11 books make a real difference. These books contain the facts and information that clearly disprove the government version and reveal the real terrorists behind 9-11 - and their motivation for the attacks.
Once you have read the Solving 9-11 books you will no longer be susceptible to the “War on Terror” propaganda because you will understand that 9-11 is a hoax meant to deceive the world. While the truth about 9-11 may be disturbing to some, it is certainly better to know the truth than to be deceived because to believe something that is not true is to be enslaved by a lie. Something like 85 percent of the American military forces in Iraq believed that they were fighting because of Saddam Hussein’s involvement in 9-11. That is to say that most of the Americans fighting and dying in Iraq were acting on completely false information. Had they known that Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9-11 they may have made other choices about serving in Iraq. The same goes for the people who served in Afghanistan. Knowing the truth about 9-11 gives you the ability to make better decisions about what you will do in the future. This is just as true for nations as it is for individuals. If the United States, as a nation, is to move ahead and make intelligent choices and policies it has to do so using the truth as its base. To continue to operate and create policies and wage wars based on a pack of lies about 9-11 can only harm the nation. The sooner the deception of 9-11 is exposed on a large scale the sooner we can return to a normal and sane political state. I think most Americans would prefer the peaceful way of life we enjoyed prior to 9-11. The Solving 9-11 books expose the deception that is at the heart of the massive fraud that has changed America – and the world. The books contain more than 11 years of research, much of it original, which makes it very hard to present in a short video of 5 or 10 minutes. What I will try to do going forward is to present certain key elements of my research in a series of short videos. I hope in this way that I can bring the relevant facts and information to more people and hasten the day that we are all free of this awful deception that began on 9-11.
Obama Acts on French Fibs about Sarin in Syria
Updated June 14, 2013 The data on Assad’s use of chemical weapons is fabricated just like the lies about weapons of [Saddam] Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. Obama is going down the path of George Bush.
Israel, whether intentionally or not, has made itself a perceived ally of the Syrian rebels – capable of replacing international shoulder-shrugging and military inaction with a policy of intervention. Based on lies and fabrications the United States and its NATO allies went to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. By using lies about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, which did not even exist, the war in Iraq was sold to the American people. These unjustified wars have plundered the U.S. economy with massive amounts of defense spending in which defense contractors earn immense profits, year after year, at the expense of the American taxpayer. The top contractors for the U.S. government are all defense related companies. The federal funds, borrowed and paid to the top 5 defense contractors alone (Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics, and Raytheon) currently amount to nearly $400 per year for every man, woman, and child in the United States. Lockheed Martin is the No. 1 contractor getting nearly $40 billion a year from the government. In 2009, the money paid to Lockheed Martin amounted to $38.512 billion, approximately $126 per person from the U.S. population of about 305 million. War is very dirty business through which huge amounts of money are stolen from the state. Apart from interest on the debt, the U.S. Defense Department is the undisputed king of the hill consuming the lion's share of the U.S. budget (about $373 billion in 2011), a budgetary distortion that does not leave much to provide for the needs of the American people. The same propaganda tactics that were used to start the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are now being used to prepare public opinion for more wars. The same lies about banned weapons are being recycled to set the stage for military intervention in Syria and Iran. It is, therefore, important to understand who is pushing for Western intervention in the war in Syria, and why. As Syrian forces and their allies regain territory from the rebels, the supporters of the rebels (some of whom have engaged in acts of cannibalism) are increasing their demands for Western states or NATO to intervene militarily to overthrow the Syrian government. This call is being led by France and Britain, states in which the Zionist Rothschild family has the greatest influence. In France, Laurent Fabius, the Jewish foreign minister who has close ties to Israel, is pushing for military intervention claiming that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons. The opinion of non-biased experts, however, is that it is the rebels who have used these banned weapons - not the Syrian government. In early May, Carla del Ponte said that the independent UN investigation into the use of chemical weapons in Syria indicated that they had been used by the rebels - not government forces. "Our investigators have been in neighboring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals and, according to their report of last week which I have seen, there are strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of sarin gas, from the way the victims were treated... This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities." The statements by del Ponte, a former Swiss attorney-general and prosecutor with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, that chemical weapons had been used by the rebels were not welcomed by those who support the rebels in Syria, especially the governments of France and Britain.
The very same French government, which wages war in Mali against Islamist militias, is now pushing for intervention in Syria to support Islamist rebels. Evidently, Islamist rebels are being used to achieve strategic goals that have nothing to do with Islam. One month after del Ponte's revelation, on June 4, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius turned the allegations around saying there was no doubt the Syrian government had used nerve agent sarin against the rebels. "There is no doubt that it's the regime and its accomplices" that are responsible for use of the gas, Fabius said on France2 television. "All options are on the table," he said. "That means either we decide not to react or we decide to react including by armed actions targetting the place where the gas is stored."
It is certainly not the national interest of France that Laurent Fabius is promoting in Mali and Syria. He is clearly working as an agent of the Rothchilds and the Zionist state of Israel when he lies about who is responsible for war crimes in Syria. Fabius has a history of working with Jewish extremists, as Robert Faurisson noted in 1995: In 1986, when Laurent Fabius was Prime Minister of France, his wife, Mme. Françoise Castro, revealed that the Jewish militants and the Interior Minister were working hand in hand. She stated: "An extraordinary novelty in political behavior: the Left has allowed Jewish militants to establish themselves in some quarters of Paris and also in Toulouse, Marseille, and Strasbourg [and to have] regular contacts with the Interior Minister." (Le Monde, March 7, 1986, p. 8). Castro and Fabius are both Jewish. Sources: “Assad's dilemma: Blame Israeli strike on rebels or retaliate and risk open war,” by Zvi Bar'el, Haaretz, May 5, 2013 "France's Fabius 'confirms sarin use' by Syria regime," BBC News, June 5, 2013 "Jewish Militants: Fifteen Years, and More, of Terrorism in France," by Robert Faurisson, June 1995 "UN's Del Ponte says evidence Syria rebels 'used sarin'," BBC News, May 6, 2013 "U.N. has testimony that Syrian rebels used sarin gas: investigator," Reuters, May 5, 2013
The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal
June 13, 2013 At the center of the NSA scandal is a gang of Israeli high-tech criminals which is connected to the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11. These connections underline the involvement of the same Israeli criminals to both 9-11 and the NSA's secret program to collect and store our personal information and conversations, which came about mainly as a consequence of 9-11. Two Israeli companies, Narus and Verint, are involved in the National Security Agency (NSA) spy scandal in which copies of our phone calls and email data are sent to secret rooms at NSA buildings across the country. These Israeli companies are closely connected to Unit 8200, the electronic espionage unit of the Israeli military. (Narus was acquired by Boeing in 2010.)
Jacob "Kobi" Alexander, the former head of Comverse, the parent company of Verint, is a wanted criminal who has fled U.S. justice to Africa and probably subsequently to Israel. It is important to note that Kobi Alexander and Comverse were closely connected to Odigo, the Israeli messaging system that was used to warn Israelis to stay away from the World Trade Center on 9-11. Furthermore, the NSA has used Israeli encryption software from RSA Security, Inc. since 2006, which means that Israelis hold the encryption keys to the entire NSA computer network. The Israelis obviously have easy access to everything at the NSA. The following video clip is of James Bamford discussing the two Israeli companies, Narus and Verint, who are involved in the massive collection of our telephone and Internet data. Bamford was on "Democracy Now!" on October 14, 2008, discussing the role of these Israeli companies, who are closely tied to Israeli intelligence. To have access to personal phone calls and emails allows Israeli intelligence to blackmail and control people, like General David Petraeus, who was forced to resign from his position as director of the C.I.A. after an extra-marital affair was revealed by unknown agents who had access to his personal email.
Bamford wrote an article entitled "Shady Companies With Ties to Israel Wiretap the U.S. for the NSA" for Wired.com in April 2012 in which he discussed the Israeli companies and the criminals who ran them: In addition to constructing the Stellar Wind center, and then running the operation, secretive contractors with questionable histories and little oversight were also used to do the actual bugging of the entire U.S. telecommunications network. According to a former Verizon employee briefed on the program, Verint, owned by Comverse Technology, taps the communication lines at Verizon, which I first reported in my book The Shadow Factory in 2008. Verint did not return a call seeking comment, while Verizon said it does not comment on such matters. At AT&T the wiretapping rooms are powered by software and hardware from Narus, now owned by Boeing, a discovery made by AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein in 2004. Narus did not return a call seeking comment. What is especially troubling is that both companies have had extensive ties to Israel, as well as links to that country’s intelligence service, a country with a long and aggressive history of spying on the U.S. In fact, according to Binney, the advanced analytical and data mining software the NSA had developed for both its worldwide and international eavesdropping operations was secretly passed to Israel by a mid-level employee, apparently with close connections to the country. The employee, a technical director in the Operations Directorate, “who was a very strong supporter of Israel,” said Binney, “gave, unbeknownst to us, he gave the software that we had, doing these fast rates, to the Israelis.” Several of the top people involved in these Israeli wiretapping companies are if fact criminals who are currently wanted for serious crimes committed in the United States, as Bamford explains in the 2012 article: Like Narus, Verint was founded in Israel by Israelis, including Jacob “Kobi” Alexander, a former Israeli intelligence officer. Some 800 employees work for Verint, including 350 who are based in Israel, primarily working in research and development and operations, according to the Jerusalem Post. Among its products is STAR-GATE, which according to the company’s sales literature, lets “service providers … access communications on virtually any type of network, retain communication data for as long as required, and query and deliver content and data …” and was “[d]esigned to manage vast numbers of targets, concurrent sessions, call data records, and communications.” In a rare and candid admission to Forbes, Retired Brig. Gen. Hanan Gefen, a former commander of the highly secret Unit 8200, Israel’s NSA, noted his former organization’s influence on Comverse, which owns Verint, as well as other Israeli companies that dominate the U.S. eavesdropping and surveillance market. “Take NICE, Comverse and Check Point for example, three of the largest high-tech companies, which were all directly influenced by 8200 technology,” said Gefen. “Check Point was founded by Unit alumni. Comverse’s main product, the Logger, is based on the Unit’s technology.” According to a former chief of Unit 8200, both the veterans of the group and much of the high-tech intelligence equipment they developed are now employed in high-tech firms around the world. “Cautious estimates indicate that in the past few years,” he told a reporter for the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz in 2000, “Unit 8200 veterans have set up some 30 to 40 high-tech companies, including 5 to 10 that were floated on Wall Street.” Referred to only as “Brigadier General B,” he added, “This correlation between serving in the intelligence Unit 8200 and starting successful high-tech companies is not coincidental: Many of the technologies in use around the world and developed in Israel were originally military technologies and were developed and improved by Unit veterans.” Equally troubling is the issue of corruption. Kobi Alexander, the founder and former chairman of Verint, is now a fugitive, wanted by the FBI on nearly three dozen charges of fraud, theft, lying, bribery, money laundering and other crimes. And two of his top associates at Comverse, Chief Financial Officer David Kreinberg and former General Counsel William F. Sorin, were also indicted in the scheme and later pleaded guilty, with both serving time in prison and paying millions of dollars in fines and penalties. When asked about these contractors, the NSA declined to “verify the allegations made.” Kobi Alexander is also closely connected to the 9-11 criminal atrocity. Alexander and Comverse are connected to the Israeli Odigo messaging company through which warnings were sent to the Israelis who were expected to be at work at the World Trade Center on 9-11. As I explained in an article entitled "Why was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee? The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11" in August 2006: The case of the Israeli criminal Kobi Alexander is like the proverbial "tip of the iceberg." While Alexander's crimes, through which he became immensely wealthy, are now evident, they are but a very small piece of a much larger Zionist criminal network – connected to the 9/11 terror attacks – which remains hidden beneath the surface. Alexander, former head of the Israel-based Comverse Technology, was, until his crimes were discovered, one of the highest paid executives in the United States. In the year 2000, for example, he reportedly earned some $102.5 million, with $93 million coming from the "exercise of options." We now know that most of Alexander's money was made through the fraudulent "exercise of options." Comverse Technology, the U.S.-based "parent company" of an older and much bigger Israel-based company with the same name, is the owner of the Verint, Ulticom, Starhome, Mercom and Startel companies. The key positions in these companies are all held by Israeli nationals. Alexander, was recently allowed to flee the United States after he and two other former Comverse executives were charged with securities, mail and wire fraud by U.S. prosecutors in Brooklyn, New York. A warrant has been issued for his arrest... While Alexander is obviously connected with Israel's military intelligence apparatus and George Soros through the mutually owned investment fund ComSor, what is not widely reported is his company's close links with Odigo, the Israeli-run instant messaging company that received – and conveyed – urgent warning messages about the imminent terror attacks on the World Trade Center, several hours before the first plane hit... Shortly after 9-11, Odigo was completely taken over by Comverse Technology, which had been part owner of Odigo since early 2000, if not earlier. Shortly after 9/11, five executives from Comverse were reported to have profited by more than $267 million from "insider trading." Avner Ronen, the "founder" of Odigo, was Vice President of Business Development of Comverse Technology in October 2005. This indicates that Ronen and Alexander, both Israeli military officers with computer backgrounds, have been close business partners since early 2000. Sources and Recommended Reading: "Israelis Hold Keys to NSA/US Military Computer Networks," by Christopher Bollyn, June 16, 2006, also published as "Israeli Code on U.S. Government Computers" in Solving 9-11: The Original Articles, p. 157 "Narus knows what you are doing on the network" by Om Malik, Forbes, August 11, 1999 "Shady Companies With Ties to Israel Wiretap the U.S. for the NSA" by James Bamford, Wired.com, April 3, 2012 "Why was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee? The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11" by Christopher Bollyn, August 24, 2006, also published as "The Israeli Fugitive and the Forewarning of 9-11" in Solving 9-11: The Original Articles, p. 162
Edward Snowden - Whistleblower Who Exposed PRISM
Updated June 12, 2013 I'm neither traitor nor hero. I'm an American. "ARCHITECTURE OF OPPRESSION" Edward Snowden, a 29-year old former systems administrator who worked with the NSA, the CIA, and Booz Allen Hamilton, stood up in a 12-minute video made on June 6 in Hong Kong to explain why he exposed the massive NSA surveillance program known as PRISM, which he describes as "the architecture of oppression." Contrary to what the Obama administration claims, the NSA surveillance program "targets the communications of everyone," Snowden says. "TURN-KEY TYRANNY" Snowden disclosed the NSA's secret surveillance program because he said "the public needs to decide whether these programs and policies are right or wrong." His greatest fear, he said, is that nothing will change and that this loss of privacy will continue and worsen in the "American surveillance state." The massive surveillance of the American people by their own government creates a political condition he described as "turn-key tyranny."
Sources: Edward Snowden, "27 Edward Snowden Quotes About U.S. Government Spying That Should Send A Chill Up Your Spine" by Michael Snyder, June 11, 2013 "Edward Snowden revealed as NSA surveillance leak whistleblower" by Tom McCarthy, guardian.co.uk, Sunday 9 June 2013 "Edward Snowden, NSA files source: 'If they want to get you, in time they will'," The Guardian, June 10, 2013
Support Bollyn.com
June 11, 2013 My research and writing are supported by donations from my readers. If you find the material on Bollyn.com worth reading, please make a donation to support my efforts. Thank you. "To ignore evil is to become an accomplice to it."
I just stumbled on to your site on a day when hopelessness and depression abounds ... at least in my heart and mind. Just wanted to say THANK YOU for standing your ground and telling the truth. And THANK YOU for all your hard work and personal sacrifices. You are indeed an inspiration. It is people like you who renew my hope in the humanity and in what is noble. All the best to you and your family. Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it.
One man is responsible for most of our knowledge of the Zionist connection to 9/11. That man is Christopher Bollyn, a pre-eminent investigative journalist. He wrote his first essay questioning the events of 9/11 on September 18th, 2001, just one week after the attacks.
I visited Andreas von Bülow, author of a best-selling book (200,000 copies sold) about the CIA and 9/11, at his home in Bonn in August 2011. Von Bülow, a former parliamentarian who oversaw operations of German intelligence, was the first political/intelligence expert I interviewed in November 2001 regarding 9/11.
Spiegel magazine, which Andreas told me is very hostile to his work and engages in a campaign of defamation against him, published a piece in English about him for the 10th anniversary of 9/11. It is"Questioning 9/11 - The Politician Turned Conspiracy Theorist". * * * Your work is my favorite, most reliable news source. I regularly challenge newspaper salesmen, students, and friends to read it and decide for themselves. Good on you! (Australian expression). * * * What are you proud of? I am proud of my support for Christopher Bollyn. Why? * * * * * "EXACTLY THE TRUTH AS WRITTEN" I liked your article, it is a nice conspiracy story, but in MY case it was exactly the truth as written. Nice to remember those old-times, when we did foolish mistakes... I certainly paid for my mistakes, but I am no criminal, just another unlucky Israeli. "This is Chris Bollyn's website. He is the bravest and most persecuted reporter in America." HOW TO USE THIS WEBSITE The best way to find a specific article is to use the List of Articlesindex in the margin on the left. The index can be sorted by title or date and will bring the reader to the specific article. There is also a handy print friendly icon in the top right-hand corner of each article selected from the List of Articles. * * * * * Dear Mr. Bollyn:
My research and analysis of 9-11 is very different from what you will find anywhere in the controlled mainstream media or alternative press. My 9-11 material will not be discussed in any of the 9-11 conferences or media coverage in the coming week not because it is incorrect or biased in any way. The only reason my 9-11 writings are not discussed in the media is because they get much too close to the truth, which is something nobody in the media wants to go anywhere near.
The controlled media is lying through its teeth to the American people just like the C.I.A., the F.B.I., and the so-called "elected" members of Congress and the U.S. government. Any person or agency who is party to deceiving the American people is clearly not on their side. These liars are the domestic enemies of the American republic. To deceive the people into sending their sons, husbands, fathers, and daughters to fight wars of aggression is criminal and treasonous. "The fact that you are giving your book [Solving 9-11] away for free, which I'm sure you worked very hard at, is even all the more impressive. May your work enlighten everyone." Badness always manifests in destruction and corruption, while goodness always manifests in preservation and benefit. My research and writings are available on this website thanks to the contributions of concerned citizens who donate to my work. Thousands of people visit my website, read, copy and repost my material. My recent article "How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11" , for example, is currently found on thousands of websites -- but very few readers contribute. In Luce’s day, a cadre of gorgeous, brilliant women from the Seven Sisters colleges backstopped this modern-day rendering plant as fact-checkers. In the late 1970s, about half the fact-checkers were men, so in addition to pouring vodka I checked facts, a process that left me bleakly cynical about journalistic accuracy. We would publish whole stories that were lies — Francois Mitterrand’s plan to destroy the French economy was a recurring theme — but at least the names were spelled correctly. HOW TO SUPPORT MY WORK - I am not compensated for my research and do not carry any advertising on my site, but my efforts take time and money. Support from my readers is what keeps this website going. If you find my work worthwhile, please donate to Bollyn.com today by clicking on the donation button in the left-hand margin or send a donation via PayPal (choose the "personal gift" method) tobollyn at bollynbooks dot com -- Thank you for your support.
Who are the thousand--that is to say, who are "the Country"? In a monarchy, the king and his family are the country; in a republic it is the common voice of the people. Each of you, for himself, by himself and on his own responsibility, must speak. And it is a solemn and weighty responsibility, and not lightly to be flung aside at the bullying of pulpit, press, government, or the empty catchphrases of politicians.
Each must for himself alone decide what is right and what is wrong, and which course is patriotic and which isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your convictions is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to yourself and to your country, let man label you as they may. If you alone of all the nation shall decide one way, and that way be the right way according to your convictions of the right, you have done your duty by yourself and by your country - hold up your head! You have nothing to be ashamed of.
McCain's Terrorists and Mohammed
Updated June 11, 2013
In an article about the secret surveillance of our phone calls and emails being done by the National Security Agency (NSA) the Associated Press reported on June 10: Edward Snowden identified himself Sunday as a principal source behind revelations about the National Security Agency's sweeping phone and Internet surveillance programs.... The NSA has been collecting the phone records of hundreds of millions of Americans each day, creating a database through which it can learn whether terror suspects have been in contact with people in the U.S. TERROR SUSPECTS? So the NSA is collecting all of this data in order to "learn whether terror suspects have been in contact with people in the U.S.?" This simply doesn't make any sense. Why should the NSA be collecting all the data from our private communications to see if we are talking to terrorists while Sen. John McCain simply goes to Syria at taxpayers expense and openly meets with real-life terrorists who are seeking to overthrow the Assad government in Damascus? The armed gangs that are trying to overthrow the Syrian government have clearly committed a host of war crimes and atrocities. The latest was the execution of a 14-year-old boy in Aleppo for a comment he made that was seen by the Muslim terrorists as heretical. The boy, Mohammed Qatta (or Qataa) sold coffee on the streets of Aleppo. There are slightly different versions of the story, but it went something like this: Mohammed Qatta had a dispute and refused to give a customer coffee. “Even if Mohammed comes back to life, I won’t,” the boy said, who was known by his nickname “Salmo.” Extremist rebels driving past in a black car overheard the comment, according to the opposition Aleppo Media Center. Qatta was taken away by the fighters and when they brought him back, his head was wrapped with his shirt and his body covered with marks from whipping. The rebels, evidently not from Syria, then read out the boy’s sentence – not in a Syrian accent, but in classical Arabic. They accused the boy of blasphemy and told the crowd – which included the boy’s parents – that anyone who insulted the Prophet would suffer a similar fate. "Generous citizens of Aleppo, disbelieving in God is polytheism and cursing the prophet is a polytheism. Whoever curses even once will be punished like this." Qatta had been shot in the mouth and neck. A photo released late Sunday of the dead Mohammed showed that his jaw had been completely destroyed. It should be noted that the primary sources of this story are media outlets associated with the rebels who are fighting the forces of the Syrian government. The rebels are an army of foreign mercenaries who are being supported by Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, France, Britain, Jordan, and the United States. As Syrian government forces, supported by Hezbollah fighters from Lebanon, continue their counter-offensive against the rebels in Homs and Aleppo we will see a frantic response on the part of the rebels and their supporters. The Obama administration is reportedly considering supplying weapons to the rebels and imposing no-fly zones over Syria. When they ask us to support the rebels in Syria we should remember what the rebels did to Mohammed in Aleppo. Sources and Recommended Reading: "5 things to note about NSA surveillance programs," Associated Press, June 10, 2013 "John McCain meets with kidnappers in Syria," Voltaire Network, June 1, 2013 "NSA, the secret AT&T spy room, and 2 Israeli companies" by Jon Rappoport, June 9, 2013 "Senator John McCain Meets Leaders of Terror Brigade in Syria. The NGOs that Made it Happen" by Phil Greaves, Global Research, June 09, 2013 "Teenager, 14, Executed By Islamist Rebels in Syria" by Alexander Marquard, ABC News, June 10, 2013
The Solving 9-11 Books & Reviews
June 4, 2013 The Most Straightforward and Accurate Accounts Your books are simply the most straightforward and accurate accounts that dare to delve into the simple "unspeakable" truth. Unspeakable because we have all been collectively brainwashed not to even dare to think in the direction that the truth points us. It is, like a reader of one of my comments once stated, "having connected the dots, we have a Rorschach of demons we fear to name." * * * "A masterpiece of investigative journalism”
RECENT COMMENTS ON THE BOOKS Enormously Important I finished the book about half an hour ago. Stumbling here and there around the Internet over the past 10 years I was aware of perhaps 40 percent of what Bollyn presents. This book is enormously important... Now I will start on the big book. * * * Comprehensive and Credible Engaging account of 9/11 events from someone who has connected the dots in many dimensions. This book attempts to answer the "how" and most importantly "why" for this crime of the century. Many other books on the subject are still pursuing the "what happened" after 12 years and while still worth doing, Bollyn's work goes another level and hypothesizes the "why" with cogency and credibility. If only half of the things in this book are true, a case for "who" was responsible for 9/11 is well made. * * * Credible, Rational, Logical Last week I discovered your name, your book, and your theory about 9/11. I spent much of the last two days and nights reading and rereading the book. I was elated to have found someone who makes a credible, rational, logical case for who the real perpetrators are. And I was shocked that your work hasn't been broadcast more widely in the 9/11 truth movement. It took me two-and-a-half years of studying reputable 9/11 websites before I happened upon your work. * * * An Engrossing Read There is a plethora of books on 9-11, and given the incredible events of that day, its sheer 'extraodinariness', that volume of books is justified. So many questions remained unanswered by the official reports (some might say 'whitewashes'). This book is a very good one. It reads fluently with good prose and structure. After finishing it, I felt I was substantially better informed on the whole 911 imbroglio. Highly recommended * * *
Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light. * * * I’ve read both your Solving 9-11 books. Particularly powerful is the compilation of background material [The Original Articles]. It provides an unedited timeline of journalistic integrity. ... I finished reading your book 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World. It is a masterpiece of investigative journalism and a reading MUST for ALL Americans, ALL world leaders, and everyone who has been affected by the consequences of this horrific crime and the tyranny that followed. "You are the ONLY 9-11 investigator who has done a credible job identifying the probable perpetrators. Most people simply focus on the scientific and engineering anomalies of the day to dispute the official report. But no one has done what you have to trace the networks behind the events.” Thank you for your perspicuity and persistence of investigation into 9-11. Thank you, too, for your courage in pursuing a line of research that seems taboo for others or peripheral to their telling the truth about 9-11. Thank you for publishing your books and making your findings so easily and widely available. Thank you for your pursuit of truth and excellence. During times when it is nigh impossible to hope for either, you have given us both. I say to Chris Bollyn, well done and don't give up as one day when enough of us know the truth there will be some sort of justice for all those innocents murdered on 9-11. The truth is incontrovertible. The Solving 9-11 set of two books is available for a $50 donation (includes shipping in the USA). To pay by check or money order make the check payable to Christopher Bollyn. For quicker delivery please use Feedback or email to contact the author. Great research! Articulated and argued brilliantly well.
Solving 9-11: The Original Articles is a collection of Bollyn's essential 9-11 research articles, written between September 2001 and the spring of 2012. These original articles contain the facts and details that prove the thesis of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. (8"x10", 360 pp., white with matte laminate cover, $29.99) The Solving 9-11 books are also available from Amazon.com. "The Deception that Changed the World" has received 5 five-star reviews from Amazon readers. Their reviews can be read here. Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World exposes the real culprits and the motivation behind the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. The purpose of the book is to liberate the people of the United States and the world from the evil deception that has been imposed on them by the architects of terror. The 6" x 9" book is a perfect bound paperback of 362 pages published and printed in the United States. American readers can obtain a copy for a $25 donation through PayPal by clicking here or by clicking on the yellow donation button in the left margin. Additional copies $20 each. Overseas orders ship for a donation of $30. The book is also available through Amazon.com, where it has received nineteen five-star reviews. Book Reviews of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World
Solving 9-11: The Original Articles I remain impressed by the thoroughness of your research as I’ve been rereading your book, Solving 9-11: The Original Articles. Your work remains vitally important in these troubled times, and commands the respect of anyone who values truth, integrity, and righteousness. * * * Answers Who, How, and Why about 9-11 This is an excellent book that connects the dots regarding the truth of 9-11 and who the real terrorists are. The author stands out as a rare journalist willing to expose the truth, even at great peril to himself. For someone just waking up to the deception that has been the official version of 9-11, this may not be the first book to read. But for those who have already come to realize that the official version of the events of September 11, 2001, defies both logic and the laws of physics, this book will give you the "rest of the story": a comprehensive account of who did it, how they did it, and why they did it. * * *
Most Important Thank you, Christopher Bollyn, for connecting the dots of 9-11 more completely than I've previously seen. I was unaware of the common denominator of each aspect of the attack: the planning, the execution, and the cover-up. The common denominator is Zionism. This book is intricately crafted, and is to be read with deliberation, then re-read. * * * * * Essential to Successful Self-Deprogramming Generally speaking, there is only one improvement that I can see is needed in this work and that is to summarize the various interconnections between people and organizations by means of a flowchart. I think that would be quite applicable here and may reveal additional information. I initially was disappointed by the fact that there are absolutely no photos, tables or illustrations in the book but it soon became obvious that he was able to write in a sufficiently straightforward and clear manner that no such accessories were needed. * * * * * New and Complete Information on 9-11 I have read several books on the subject of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, and this book presented information I had not seen in other books. It presents a credible case for extreme Zionist supporters of Israel being the perpetrators of this event. The results of Christopher Bollyn’s research provide a very complete case which includes names of the conspirators. * * * * * Solving 9-11 Proves a Conspiracy The strongest evidence that 9-11 was an inside job comes from the tons of highly sophisticated, military grade nano-thermites that were found in the rubble immediately following the 9-11 attacks as Christopher Bollyn astutely mentions in his book Solving 9-11; The Deception that Changed the World. This information was published in 2009 in a credible, peer-reviewed, scientific journal (the name of the paper is: "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9-11 World Trade Center Catastrophe") and has not been refuted by anyone in the scientific community - or anyone else for that matter - since. Bollyn also mentions 4,000 Israelis who worked in the twin towers who received text messages (for Israeli subscribers only) prior to the attacks telling them to leave the building. They all got out, except for perhaps two Israelis who perhaps did not get the message. This message was not passed along to the authorities, essentially proving a conspiracy. Other Israelis were seen setting up camera equipment before the attacks to document the event, and after the attacks, they were seen celebrating joyously by eyewitnesses. After being arrested, they received high-level clearance to be returned to Israel. Bollyn also points out that the metal was quickly carted away before a proper investigation could be conducted, which violates the most basic protocol for any criminal investigation. Many of the individuals and numerous companies Bollyn scrutinizes in his book are interconnected, and by the time you get done reading his book, it becomes more than obvious there's been a cover up by the same supranational global elites who own our media as a way of preventing the average person from finding out about it. Their ultimate goal is a one-world global dictatorship. 9-11 is a step toward that goal by getting us into Iraq and Afghanistan and using the fraudulent "War on Terror" to limit our personal freedoms via the Patriot Act. I would strongly recommend this book. * * * * * Peeling Back the Onion of 9-11 Deception 9-11 isn't over till it's over. Bollyn is a natural born skeptic (thank heavens) and has pursued leads others avoided. We Americans have been well trained to respect the Holocaust, especially in a country that considers itself Judeo-Christian. This is touchy territory, revered since WW2, especially by those of us living at the time who were touched by a loss in that war. Bollyn shows no fear in entering the past and numerous aspects of history that have enabled the success of Israel, its growth and power. One can lose good friends by even discussing it or asking questions about "Zion". As a structural engineer who questioned the collapse of the buildings as I saw them falling that morning on TV, in bed with my wife and our son to follow this astounding event as it unfolded, the collapse didn't make sense to me, and the visuals were far too much like Hollywood special effects. Bollyn carefully puts pieces of the puzzle together to fill in more of the "why" side of my concern. This is the sort of writing that could get a curious reporter "disappeared", even in America. What happened to the news reporters we have had in the past who asked those hard questions, for the sake of our America? I finished this book a couple weeks ago, and am now going to read it again. I need to let this all sink into my brain, get a new toehold on this ascent to peace and see where I am at this point. Our illegal wars and war crimes continue, based on 9-11. It ain't over til it's over. * * * * * Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World 9/ 11 was an attack on America. This massive crime scene contained evidence to show how 3 buildings exploded, what type of explosives were used to disintegrate the structures, contents and 3 thousand people, leaving their dry bone fragments and slivers blown around the area. Most of the evidence was destroyed, but plenty left to close in on the suspects. So the big question is: Is it TREASON to hinder, delay or ridicule an investigation of real evidence to protect the suspects who carried out this devastating attack on America? Is the word "dual citizen" an oxymoron? Someone once said you cannot serve two masters, anybody care anymore? This book is essential to shed light on who was capable of committing this heinous crime, and who continue to ridicule and harm those who seek the truth, whose patriotism is to their country, and not some political entity. * * * * * Review of Solving 9-11 Christopher Bollyn has written a thoroughly-researched book on the question of 'Who did 9-11 and Why?' His 362-page book is a wealth of information about the Israeli groups, the men, and businesses that put themselves in place over several decades, and which enabled the Israeli Mossad to destroy the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001. Bollyn's book is a 'No Put Down' story that compels the reader to read on. He intricately weaves together and identifies the network necessary to accomplish the attack against America, as well as other false-flag attacks perpetrated by Israeli Zionists, and has produced a tapestry that points to no others. He has truly identified the culprits of 9-11 and proven it was not Osama Bin Laden or Al Qaida. It was a sophisticated group of terrorists, with ties to Israel and the Mossad, that brought down the buildings so that they could put into effect the War on Terror. And most Americans fell for the lie. * * * * * The Ultimate 9/11 Book Christopher Bollyn's intensely researched in-depth book Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World exposes the criminals who carried out the horrific events on 9-11, and it was not the CIA/Mossad-created Osama Bin Laden, or the fall guys for any terrorist act carried out throughout the world, Al Qaida. Unlike the journalists and investigative reporters working for Zionist-owned and controlled mainstream newspaper and TV news media, who were forbidden to report anything regarding 9-11, except disinformation, distorted facts, and outright lies, Mr. Bollyn connected the dots, going back nearly 20 years prior to 9-11, and he identifies who was responsible for planning and executing the biggest crime and cover-up of the century. Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World is a very well-written book. A fast read full of facts from cover to cover. I highly recommend it. It is my reference book for all things regarding 9-11. If you read this book, your next step should be to contact your elected representatives in Washington, the White House, and the Department of Justice and demand justice and that these criminals be fully investigated and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. * * * * * An Excellent Book Christopher Bollyn has done his homework and then some. He presents a very strong, compelling case for the involvement of the Mossad, Israel, the neo-cons in the attacks of September 11th. That is an area in which he has a great amount of knowledge and he presents it in a clear, rational way. I must admit that I do believe that other intelligence agencies also played roles in the attack, including MI6, the CIA, Pakistan's ISI, and the Saudi's intelligence network, but to me it is unclear as to who the principle string puller might be or how many people thought that they were pulling the strings, how many were unknowing patsies to not just the crimes of 9/11, but the crimes that followed, which killed more people, transferred more wealth, than the original crimes. There is plenty of criminality to identify, as we have witnessed an enormous transference of wealth from the many to the few, a greater concentration of wealth into fewer and fewer hands, and the expansion of the National Security State to the Global Police State. How to undo the damage is the biggest challenge that we have and step one is understanding the size, nature, shape of the problems we face and that is what Christopher Bollyn has courageously attempted to do in his work. He has supplied a vital piece of the puzzle. I appreciate his work greatly and would recommend it to others. * * * * * What a Shame If you're only going to read one book about 9-11, this would be it. Unlike most of the other books out there on the subject, the author leaves no doubt as to who was really behind that fateful day, and why. It needs to be mentioned, though, that this is not a "sensationalist" type read. On the contrary, it is a straightforward, step-by-step compilation of little known facts that lead straight to the perpetrators. It is a shame that most Americans will never hear about this book, let alone read it. * * * * * The Truth vs Lying Deceit/Propaganda Chris Bollyn has exemplified himself in the Principles of "Putting The Truth before Personal Aggrandizement". His book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, should & must be read by everyone that considers themselves to be for The Truth and against The Evil/Reprobate Plans of The World Powered Elite...aka...International Bankers & World Controllers! The so-called "Evangelical Right" have prostituted themselves by refusing to acknowledge the realities of World Dictatorial Tyrannies. Chris Bollyn exposes the machinations of the men who have been put into places of power/authority to destroy the Will to Resist here in America and Internationally. It is a sad commentary on the MSM that Chris Bollyn's Information has not been trumpeted to every nook & cranny of American Life! * * * * * 9/11 Beyond A Reasonable Doubt You would think that the subject of 9/11 and wanting to know the TRUTH about what really happened, would be talked about and debated in all the major media, by our elected leaders and pursued by our law enforcement and our legal system. You would think that with the loss of 3,000 lives on that tragic day, and many more since, our democratic institutions, our belief in justice, would give us something better to accept and understand, than the "official" fairy tale that is so monumentally insane and incredible, so contrived and contemptable... well you would think there has to be something that takes 9/11 really much more seriously and scholarly. SOLVING 9-11: THE DECEPTION THAT CHANGED THE WORLD does exactly that! Independent investigative author Christopher Bollyn, was brave enough, determined enough, to spend years running down leads and connecting all of the dots. The facts are presented to you on their merit with full reference and credibility. 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB, a ZIONIST INSIDE JOB, with the covert participation of top people in both the US and Israeli governments. It was the result of years of strategic planning, of making sure that not only could they execute this monsterous crime, but they could cover it up and use it to an advance a political agenda that would lead to the so-called war on terrorism. Bollyn supplies in minute detail, the evidence that clearly shows how the mass murders were carried out and by whom. Islam was the perfect patsy, the perfect boogey man to rally the world. And the Zionist controlled media, was the perfect vehicle to sell it to the ignorant, brain washed masses. When those three towers collapsed, our trust and faith, our very liberties, our constitution, were turned to toxic dust right alongside them. The Patriot Act... if you don't believe or question the "official" story, you're a terrorist. Well, most people are happy and content to live in ignorance and fear. Internet privacy, the TSA, drones and other draconian measures, have become the post 9/11 America. GW Bush said "they (Islamic terrorists) hate us for our freedoms"... well our own so-called sworn to defend the US Constitution Presidents and elected leaders, have done more to destroy our country and our freedoms, than any terrorist ever could. Christopher Bollyn is to be admired and applauded, for presenting 9/11 in a way that would more than convince all but the totally gullible brain dead, in that everything that happened was part of a huge false-flag, psych-op that involved the full co-operation of numerous traitors within our own military and security, not to mention our media and our judicial system. The work of dedicated Zionists, not Jews, but Zionists and Christian-Zionists, and a number of perverted patriots. In something as grave and serious as 9/11 and more so what has followed since, you should carefully read and study this book. And then, if you really do care what is happening now, you'll want to educate others and maybe prevent the 9/11's the exalted establishment has planned for us in the future! * * * * * Book Review - Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World No journalist has taken a deeper, harder look at 9-11 than Christopher Bollyn. Described as overwhelmingly precise and alarmingly accurate, Bollyn’s book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, is available online at http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book. Unflinching, in-depth and unapologetic, Bollyn has not backed off identifying the Mossad/Zionist powers as the puppet-masters pulling the strings that fateful September day. “I am not like those who claimed to be 9-11 researchers, but who now say they have ‘moved beyond 9-11.’ How can anyone abandon the pursuit of the truth about 9-11 before the crime has been solved? Eight years after the terrorist attacks in which some 3,000 innocent people died, not one victim’s lawsuit has yet gone to trial. As a nation, Americans cannot allow 9-11 to go unsolved. “How can we forget the hundreds of people who were roasted alive in the burning twin towers? How can we ignore the death and destruction that we, as a result, have wrongfully inflicted on the innocent people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, and Palestine? Who can accept an irresponsible administration dragging our military from one illegal war to another in the utterly fraudulent ‘war on terror,’ which the Bush administration promised will last for generations? “If we, as Americans, don’t demand the truth about 9-11, who and what do we really stand for? Everything this administration has done for the past six years has been based on an unproven interpretation of the events of 9-11. What does it mean to be a citizen of ‘the land of the free and the home of the brave’ if we allow our minds and our nation to be so easily hijacked by government lies and propaganda? During the past few months, I have redoubled my efforts to solve 9-11. As the cover-up becomes more obvious and the guilty parties reveal themselves, this is the time to intensify the pressure, not give up. ZIONIST ZEITGEIST “I cannot abide mass murder, occupation, and genocidal wars of aggression. Nor can I accept the corruption of our values and destruction of our basic American rights to suit an artificially imposed ‘war on terror.’ With the passage of time, it is now clear that 9-11 was carried out in order to kick-start the perverse Zionist Zeitgeist called the ‘war on terror’ with its pre-planned wars of aggression and occupation. “In December 2001, veteran German intelligence professionals told me that 9-11 had been executed by a state-sponsored criminal network and had required years of planning. Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of Germany’s domestic intelligence service, the Verfassungsschutz, told me in 2001 that ‘the deathly precision’ and ‘the magnitude of planning’ of the 9-11 attacks would have required ‘years of planning.’ Such a sophisticated operation, Werthebach said, would require the ‘fixed frame’ of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a ‘loose group’ like the one allegedly led by Mohammed Atta while he studied in Hamburg. “If Werthebach’s analysis is correct, and I have every reason to believe it is, the official version is nothing but a pack of lies. This would mean that the members of the criminal network are still in the highest positions of power in the U.S., Israel, and other nations. The members of this network are dedicated to preventing the evidence from being released because it would expose the real perpetrators. This is the only logical reason why the 9-11 evidence has been suppressed, the investigation controlled, and the litigation and discovery processes obstructed. “At this point, it should be clear that 9-11 will never be solved by the federal government, the appointed investigators or law enforcement agencies, or the corrupt courts. These controlled agencies, like the Zionist-controlled media, are only interested in controlling the information and preventing the real truth from being revealed. This crime will only be solved by concerned and dedicated independent researchers.” Without Bollyn, the 9-11 Truth Movement is much less than truthful. Without Bollyn we don’t really know 9-11. Without Bollyn we don’t really know the crisis on Wall Street, the controlled demolition of General Motors, the truth about school shootings, and many other passages to the Byzantine labyrinth of world domination. A European publisher interested in publishing Bollyn’s 9-11 work hired a professional editor to thoroughly fact-check the most contentious chapter. Investigation of 95 points found each fact verified, correct and unassailable by reputable sources. Bollyn was brutally assaulted and TASERed while handcuffed outside his home in front of his wife and daughter by body armored undercover police. Later he was charged with two manufactured misdemeanors and subjected to a kangaroo court. He wisely took his family to Europe prior to sentencing. Solely supported by reader contributions, Bollyn continues to dig to the bedrock of the issues that plague our country. With the internet in the cabal’s cross-hairs, supporting Bollyn’s desire to publish Solving 9-11 in hard copy is a patriotic action. Source: The Idaho Observer, October 2009
Are there Chinchillas on Mars?
Updated June 3, 2013
Your "Chinchilla on Mars" posting is a needless, pointless, frivolous distraction that will damage your credibility... The "chinchilla" is a rock that has features somewhat reminiscent of a chinchilla... Please remove the posting, or at least mitigate it by saying that it is probably a rock. (NB! Pickar's father, Kenneth A. Pickar, is a professor at Caltech, the private institution that runs the Mars mission, and is on the President's Advisory Board for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the agency which is managing the mission.)
The most popular science story on FoxNews.com on May 29 was an article entitled "'Mars rat' spied by NASA's Curiosity rover." The Fox News article is about a photograph taken on September 28, 2012, by NASA's rover that is supposedly roaming around on the surface of Mars. The photograph clearly shows what appears to be chinchilla-like rodent between a couple rocks. The people who are running the mission to Mars should be ecstatic about finding evidence of life on the Red Planet. Instead of telling the world about the discovery of a rodent on Mars, NASA and the JPL are clearly trying to avoid discussing this photo. This raises the question, is the NASA rover really on Mars or is it simply roaming around the Atacama Desert in Chile, or some other Mars-like terrain on planet Earth? Having spent untold billions of taxpayer dollars on its mission to Mars, is NASA duping us about the whole thing? Just where did this chinchilla come from?
After getting a comment asking me to remove the posting, I looked more closely into the nature of the rodent seen in the photograph. The person who asked me to remove the posting is Robert D. Pickar of San Pedro. His father, Kenneth Arnold Pickar of Rolling Hills (a gated enclave of Palos Verdes), is a visiting professor at Caltech. Caltech runs the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), which is managing the Mars mission. Kenneth Pickar, who has been at Caltech since 1998, is on the President's Advisory Board for the JPL. The JPL is a Federally funded research and development center managed and operated by Caltech under a contract from NASA. In fiscal year 2012, the JPL's budget was nearly $1.5 billion (On average, Caltech, a tiny private institution in Pasadena, receives about $1.74 billion per year, more than $783,000 per student from the U.S. taxpayer.) If the highly-paid people who run the Mars mission are so concerned about my chinchilla posting I had better make sure I have my rodents straight. While I agree with the criticism that the animal may not be a chinchilla, it certainly does not look like a rock. The little fellow looks furry and has eyes and ears and a tail. It actually looks more like a white-tailed antelope squirrel than a chinchilla. The white-tailed antelope squirrel is a species of rodents commonly found in the deserts of California and Nevada. The first photograph below is from the Mars mission.
Source: Kenneth Pickar's CV, 2005 Kenneth Pickar's presentation on Caltech and its mission to Mars, Monash University, Australia, 2010 "'Mars rat' spied by NASA's Curiosity rover," FoxNews.com, May 29, 2013 Original full size photo, NASA, September 28, 2012 White-tailed Antelope Squirrel, sibr.com, May 31, 2013
Q&A and Comment Forum
June 1, 2013 Because so many good comments and questions come to Bollyn.com through Feedback I created this Q&A forum. The latest comments and questions come first. The person who asked about the "Ground Zero" Islamic center "controversy" in New York City sent this kind comment: Thank you very much for your excellent answer. But then, everything you have written is excellent and well researched. You are a real hero and an example of courage and honesty. Latest Comment: Chris, You're a great journalist who has built up great moral credibility with your pioneering 9-11 research. Your 9-11 research passes technical muster. Your "chinchilla on Mars" posting is a needless, pointless, frivolous distraction that will damage your credibility. The "chinchilla" is a rock that has features somewhat reminiscent of a chinchilla. It is just like the "Face on Mars" from the 1970's Viking missions, which were, of course, just a configuration of hills. Unless you can show that the "chinchilla" is moving, or otherwise alive, this posting is enormously damaging and will take away from YEARS of hard-won credibility (you were TASED by police and forced to flee the country!) and reduce you to a "giggle-factor". Please remove the posting, or at least mitigate it by saying that it is probably a rock. Best Regards, Robert Bollyn Responds: This comment comes from Robert Daniel Pickar, the son of Kenneth Arnold Pickar. Kenneth Pickar is a visiting professor at Caltech. Caltech runs the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which operates the Mars mission for NASA. I responded to Robert asking him if his father's connections to Caltech, the JPL, and NASA have anything to do with his request. Robert Pickar responded: Not only did my father, Kenneth Pickar, NOT ask me to write the email to you, he doesn't know about it, it has NOTHING to do with him, and he will be LIVID with me if he finds out about your post! ... I want this to be a productive conversation, and I believe that you are a decent person, so I ask you, will you remove this entirely slanderous and off-base posting about me and my father? What will it require for you to accept that this is in error and must ethically be removed? I certainly don't want to slander anyone. I am merely pointing out the fact that the person who asked me to remove the posting about the Mars mission is the son of a professor at the small private research institution that is running the operation. Kenneth Pickar, originally from the Bronx, has had a long career working with companies and institutions that work with NASA. He even worked and taught at the Technion in Haifa, Israel, in the early 1970s. He now lives in the Golden State in a multi-million dollar home in the gated community of Rolling Hills, near Palos Verdes. All of this information comes from his own CV and is not meant be slanderous in any way. See Ken Pickar's CV here: http://www.its.caltech.edu/~kpickar/html/Resume_2005.pdf
Comment: Hello Chris, 19 year old reader here - Comment: Piper's campaign against Bollyn is a Jewish smear campaign on a man who exposed the Jewish hand behind 9/11. All human-factor, personal dispositions aside, I submit the following: In the oceans of extra-curricular text that I have devoured during college and since graduation, I am well equipped to discern what I read. Based on my experiences with publishers both on and off campus during my college days and with those after graduation in the alternative media, I have a feel for who works for whom. Sadly, but not surprisingly, many of the "big names" in so-called alternative media have been co-opted by Jewish money (call them the Meyer Lansky Gang if you want). Predictably and right on time. All you gotta do is crack, if you can weather the slog, any of Mike Piper's books to see what's happening at the American Free Press (AFP) and Barnes Review. Piper plugs their Jewish lawyer-owner, Mark Lane, throughout his texts, singing his praises. I question whether a man named Michael Collins Piper [real name Michael Bernard Piper] actually wrote "books" per se. He claims to be a journalist, but nothing attributed to his by-lines reads like one. His books appear to me like a patch-work of assorted ghost-writers. There is no definitive thread of writer's voice that runs through them and ties them together. His books lack a signature. They lack a feel that attributes text to its author. In my dealings with Piper, he took care to not write more than a line or two in my direction. He slipped into a phone call between Mark Glenn and me once. I got this "drum roll" introduction from Mark Glenn as though Piper was somebody's Kahuna. Piper was feeling me out for girl'ity and fan'dom I suppose. He got neither. Mark Glenn is one of Piper's close friends according to both Glenn and Piper. For example Piper's much-trumpeted Final Judgment is a quilt of other men's text sewn together loosely by annoying, superfluous words. Bad writing, pure and simple. Crappy writing to be frank in some spots. Puerile in style. Like a newbie who graduated last week whose daddy owns the big city paper and wants to call Jr. a journalist -- to his cocktail party and golf club. The lines that smote me as brilliant were enclosed in quotation marks. Other men wrote them. Final Judgment reads like a research paper from a high school kid. No wonder Piper seeks to discredit and smear a journalist like Christopher Bollyn. What Piper is good at is not writing, but defamation. How Jewish is that? What Piper's paymasters fail to cover, envy shall. Piper's campaign against Bollyn is a Jewish smear campaign on a man who exposed the Jewish hand behind 9/11. Since Mark Lane (formerly Levin) owns the American Free Press, it would be Lane (Levin) who pulls the strings at AFP. Hence their feeble attempt to sabotage my work there. Petherick, fake-named Victor Thorn [real name Scott Makufka], and Mike Piper are puppets and profiteers in my opinion. They capitalize on the fears and concerns of aging conservatives who read AFP on their porch rockers. People who don't know how to type and don't own a computer. Willis Carto is 86 years of age, a WWII veteran. They are using his good name as a rubber stamp to push the Barnes Review and AFP pabulum rag to old people. Bollyn Responds: You are quite right about the deception that is going on at American Free Press and the Liberty Lobby. It is absolutely evil to deceive and fleece patriotic Americans with their fake Liberty Lobby and its newspaper. (I know how fraudulent it is having worked there for 6 years.) Mike Piper even brags about his Jewish relatives and carries a portfolio from AIPAC. Ask yourself, why would a patriotic American do that? The owner of AFP is Mark Lane, whose original family name was Levin. His father was a Jewish accountant named Harry Arnold Levin. Mark Lane is former U.S. Army Intelligence from post-war Germany, where there is a similar controlled opposition newspaper called National Zeitung. It should be noted that Mark Lane was the primary psy-ops agent/handler who instigated the horrific massacre at Jonestown in Guyana.
Now, why would a high-level psy-ops agent like Mark Lane be interested in running American Free Press, which uses the exact same scare tactics? What's the real connection between Jonestown and AFP? What's going on?
Beware of the tainted Kool-Aid: read all the sordid details about Mike Piper and Mark Lane in my article: * * * * *
Comment: The entire Dark Cabal needs to immediately be arrested! Enough of this nonsense!! We must repudiate all of this illegal debt. We should look to the Other 1%, the best and brightest, to help us repair the damage that has been done. The worst that humanity has to offer, and only marginally smarter than average, have hoodwinked almost everyone into falling for their crazy scheme to control us. If we do nothing to stop them, they will create Hell on Earth. Bollyn Responds: I agree completely. A criminal regime has clearly ruled the United States since 2000, if not longer. The evidence shows that this crimocracy is complicit in the criminal cover-up of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11, which resulted in the destruction of the evidence and obstruction of justice for the victims. Then, based on a pack of lies about what happened on 9-11 and who was behind it, the ruling criminals took the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, and other nations to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It needs to be understood that these wars are criminal in nature because they were started and waged on false allegations, which were known to be false at the time, i.e. lies. Planning or conspiring to engage in such wars, which are known as "wars of aggression," is a "crime against peace" under international law based on the Nuremberg Principles. Principle III of the Nuremberg Principles states: "The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law." Furthermore, it is criminal for President Obama to simply turn the page and close the book on the long list of crimes committed by the previous administration. What needs to happen is for all the guilty parties (e.g. George Bush, Dick Cheney, Michael Chertoff, et al) to be charged and investigated for their high crimes committed while in office. Failing to do that will only enable the ruling crimocracy to continue with its criminal agenda, which will indeed result in "Hell on Earth." The only question is how it will be done. Comment: I was introduced to the planned destruction of the World Trade Center buildings a few months ago. My first contact with it was through Dr. Steven Jones and a video I found covering the events and the scientific study approach ignoring all but just how did the three buildings come down. After viewing "Explosive Evidence," which aired on Colorado's PBS stations last year, I was convinced - and so very sad over the prospects my government was responsible for this terrible act. Anyway, as I accumulated more and more information, looked at the stuff out there, rejecting the junk and only considering the plausible, I found myself more and more depressed that 9-11 was actually committed by my government; they murdered 3,000 people in one day, kicked this country into endless war - and it looks as if they may get away with it. I have contacted as many political types as possible asking for new hearings and such. My life has been altered and not for the best, I must say. The deep and wide gulf that must be traversed, the people involved, the terrible laws enacted to support the tyranny heading our way, the daily barrage aimed at the 2nd Amendment crowd (I am part of that crowd) to disarm us, and the total uphill battle ahead of us to regain our nation is so hard to contemplate. I pray God will help us upright our ship of state, and that He will answer our S.O.S. (T.P. in Missouri) Bollyn Responds: The intellectual quandary that you describe so well is very real and something that all serious 9-11 scholars go through. One has to realize that there is no escaping this quandary, but there is a solution to the problem. The only real solution is to be liberated from the evil deception that surrounds the events of 9-11. This is why my book, Solving 9-11, has an image of the sun rising over North America. It is, after all, a positive and enlightening thing to be relieved of a deception. The false-flag terrorism of 9-11 is clearly anathema to any patriotic American, but it is true that some Americans were involved in the crime and the cover-up. These are 'Americans' like Michael Chertoff and Dov Zakheim who served a foreign power, Israel, while they occupied high-level positions in the U.S. government. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are also Americans who have utterly betrayed the American people and republic. These people have all committed high crimes and treason against the United States and must be prosecuted for their crimes. As Dr. Martin Luther King said, "To ignore evil is to become an accomplice to it." The lackadaisical attitude of the Obama administration that we, as a nation, can simply let bygones be bygones with such monstrous crimes as 9-11, its cover-up, and the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq simply indicates that it is part of the same criminal network that is behind these crimes. There is no escaping the fact that we must hold the 9-11 criminals accountable for their crimes. Real justice is the only solution. Comment: Judy Wood and Scientific Reality The claim being made by Wood that an event is happening at a molecular level where molecules are suddenly sent flying away form one another in a heatless explosion is absolutely impossible, given what physicists consider to be knowledge. It would take a huge amount of evidence before the international community of physicists began to believe that such an event as “dustification” has ever actually happened. It would take much more evidence than the observations made of the Twin Towers turning into dust as they fell, even if there were no alternative explanations for these observations. The Thermite Argument provides a sound explanation for the observations made of the Twin Towers turning into dust as they fell. It is more than probable that nano-thermite was burning and was perhaps also exploding inside the Twin Towers as they fell. This is known with much certainty, and it adequately explains the pulverization of the Twin Towers. However, even if there were no evidence of thermite, the idea of a material cause that makes matter of every kind, steel as well as plastic and cement, suddenly explode into tiny particles due to a change in operative electrical forces at the molecular level, cannot be given scientific credibility by the observations made of the Twin Towers as they fell—along with all the other empirical evidence cited by Wood, such as a hurricane supposedly inexplicably changing its course. The totality of the evidence cited by Wood, no matter how well it stood up to scrutiny, would not be remotely close to what it would take to give scientific credibility to her far-fetched claim of “dustification.” What is going on here is obviously disinformation, as Christopher Bollyn has stated. It is a deliberate “spreading of false news” that is meant to obscure the truth of what really happened on 9/11. (K.B. in California) Question: I recently found your site and wanted to thank and congratulate you on your work... you connected more dots on 9/11 than I ever thought possible! However, as a Canadian, I really must correct you on the appointment of the Canadian Deputy Minister of National Defense, who is appointed by the Minister of Defense, in consultation with the Prime Minister. In practical terms, he is appointed by the PM who appoints the Defense Minister to his Cabinet. Also, the Queen does not rule Canada in any way and has not even been a figurehead for decades (there are some left over ceremonial remnants in our government but absolutely no direct authority... and perhaps this was the source of your confusion). I must say it does little for your credibility to be so wrong on the very core structure of a country you accuse of involvement in such a heinous crime, but I'm sure it's simply an honest (3rd party?) mistake. Wishing you the very best, and continued success with your investigations! M.G. in Toronto Bollyn Responds: Thanks for your note. I am not blaming Canadians for 9-11, but the idea that Canadians and/or Canadian territory were involved in 9-11 is not at all far-fetched. The key role, as yet unexplained, played by two senior Canadian military officers in the NORAD drill on 9-11 clearly draws Canada and Canadians into the sordid saga. Secondly, there are the awards and titles given to these Canadian officers, Rudy Giuliani, and others by the Queen of England for their service on 9-11? Why, pray tell, did the Queen of England give awards to American politicians and Canadian officers for their service on 9-11? They did nothing right! More to the point, the actions of those who were knighted and honored by the Queen had allowed the attacks to succeed - and these individuals were then rewarded by the Queen of the British Empire. Was this to compensate these poor souls for the treachery they had committed? About Canada's Deputy Minister of Defence, this is what Wikipedia says: The Department of National Defence is headed by the Deputy Minister of National Defence... The Deputy Minister is appointed by the Crown (Queen-in-Council) on the advice of the Prime Minister. This is what Canada's National Defence Act says about the appointment: "There shall be a Deputy Minister of National Defence who shall be appointed by the Governor in Council to hold office during pleasure." The Queen or sovereign is the head of state in Canada. The Governor General of Canada represents the sovereign, and most of the powers and authority of the sovereign have been delegated to the Governor General. The prime minister is the head of government in Canada. The government is formally referred to as Her Majesty's Government and is defined by the Canadian constitution as the Queen acting on the advice of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada. This is known as the Queen-in-Council or sometimes the Governor-in-Council, referring to the Governor General of Canada as the Queen's stand-in. "During pleasure" refers to the legal term "At Her Majesty's pleasure," which according to the Wikipedia article on the subject, means exactly what it says: At Her Majesty's pleasure is a legal term of art derived from all legitimate authority for government stemming from the Crown. Originating in the United Kingdom, it is now used throughout the Commonwealth realms. In realms where the monarch is represented by a Governor-General, the phrase may be modified to be at the Governor's pleasure, since the governor-general, governor, or lieutenant governor is the Queen's personal representative in the country, state or province. From these sources it seems pretty clear to me that Canada's Deputy Minister of Defense is indeed appointed by the Crown and serves at Her Majesty's pleasure. Comment: The firebombing of Dresden is just one of the horrific war crimes of 1945-1946 carried out by our gallant Allied forces. General Eisenhower certainly showed his true colors as a war criminal, torturing and starving hundreds of thousands of German prisoners of war, civilians, and refugees. It was Winston Churchill himself who ordered the bombing of civilian targets early in the war. It forced Hitler to retaliate by using the "blitz" on London. Churchill, Roosevelt, Truman, Stalin, and even Hitler, all had their handlers; they were all controlled by the very same banksters. Germany was set up to lose WWII. Why did they let the British escape from Dunkirk? Why did Hitler ignore his generals and intelligence officers who knew where D-Day was going to be, and when? Hitler was the puppet who was installed to lead them to defeat. It was Victor Rothschild who handled Churchill, and he went on to become Britain's number one spy for the Soviets, or rather Israel and the Soviets; same thing. Of course, he was not made public, he was untouchable, as he still is in the "history" books and media.
No. You don't see daredevil, flag-waving heroic films about all this. When the so-called "good" guys do anything bad, it never appears in print or on the screen. Our scholarly books and academics only echo all the contrived, manipulated, manufactured, and delivered-to-order history we need to know. All the great, monumental volumes on Churchill, the pillar of the British Empire, exalted humanitarian - and what a crock! This is why 9-11 like all the other crimes, will always be hidden from the masses. Myths, or rather outright lies are created and perpetuated for such events as the Titanic "sinking", JFK assassination, the 7/7 London bombings and on and on. The masses are too brainwashed, too sedated/medicated, too engaged in just trying to survive in their own lives, to worry or even care about all this. They're too depressed, too much in debt and way too much humanoid now, to even know just how enslaved and mind controlled they've really become. We both keep trying to educate, to wake them all up... whether it’s the latest police shootout, school massacre, or other staged piece of terror, I have a hard job myself keeping from going crazy. Why would the good Lord allow all this to happen; is it all a test? Anyway Christopher, my own research and that of much more qualified people than me, will clearly show, will prove just how 9/11 played its part in forever advancing the banksters’ evil agenda. (G.H. in California) Comment: Hello Christopher, In reference to your Romney forecast for president, because of him being the Zionist favorite... Well, being British, and being even more cynical than you, I believe everything was decided for Obama when the ruling elite put him in the job in the first place. Elections are mere theatre, illusion of choice. The criminal banking cabal, through their Zionist agents, through their willing dupes, their owned politicians, media, and judiciary, always manage to accept whoever the elite choose. JFK was the last president to question his masters, and any criticism or discussion of his public execution is still, fifty years later, met with the same denial and ridicule as 9-11 and every other world shattering event. Zionists, Freemasons; they're all Satanists, as their kind of evil could only come from secret societies, exclusive clubs, and the "privileged classes," that the masses accept as normal and well meaning. You and numerous others have well proved why, how, and by whom, 9-11 was carried out. Unfortunately, I feel the masses will never fully accept the truth about the evil that controls their lives, as from childhood, they have been conditioned, brain-washed, to believe in their governments and institutions. To believe the fairy tale history they are taught in school, to believe that good always triumphs over evil, which they are taught in church. Their minds have a built-in block that filters out the real truth. People by nature, as the Tavistock Institute discovered in the 1920's, want to belong, want to be part of the majority, want to comply... Anyway, like you I suspect, I have chronic insomnia, with all this going on in my mind, and hoping that the masses will wake-up one day. I greatly admire your determination and spirit. However when you see 9-11 as just another part of the centuries old conspiracy that continues to dominate us all, how do you manage to comprehend any hope for the future, and our children, let alone manage to sleep nights? I pose an impossible question, don't I, Christopher? When I try to explain to people 9-11 or JFK, I first talk about money. How money is created literally out of thin air by the central (criminal, private) banks. I go on to show that there is no debt, none at all. If governments go back to creating their own currency, like they once did, interest free. Then it’s simply a question of spending within a fixed budget. They wouldn't be beholden to anyone. With that the case, governments wouldn't be in anyone's pocket. There would be no corruption, and no need for wars or 9-11's. They say that money is the root of all evil... well the City of London banksters, the Rothschilds and their like, created the so-called "intelligence services" to make sure that countries, governments, don't get to control their own money and credit. MI6 created the CIA and Mossad, to get the world into perpetual debt, and to enslave mankind. The intelligence community serves the banksters, and no one else. What’s more, the banksters establish and control all the "think tanks," research foundations, all the so-called endowment trusts, the kind that so graciously fund PBS. The banksters control education, they fund both left and right wing groups, and they always lead the opposition, because they always start it. Now to get the masses, to get an average intelligence person to understand all this is like asking them to accept aliens from another planet as their real parents. It completely cuts their foundation away, their anchor, their sanity and reasoning. As I've said with your scholarly, intense research and books, you've well shown that 9-11 was a monumental false-flag operation. That 3,000 people and 3 iconic skyscrapers were merely used as props to stage an apocalyptic event that would launch all-out war in the Middle East, and get the world to surrender its freedom and rights, for so-called security. Protection from the "terrorists"... only the terrorists are, and have always been the banksters. No, it's not Rod Serling's Twilight Zone; it's our real world today! Unfortunately, the youth of today are even more willing to accept all the lies and injustices. I call it a "latte mentality"; indifferent to what's really going on beyond their I-pads and laptops. The banksters have long wanted to break up the family unit, to confuse and to sedate the masses. Drug stores on every other corner, hundreds of mindless TV channels, instant downloads... it's no wonder our young people fall prey to this evil Pied Piper. Of course some are able to resist, to still think for themselves, but they're losing out. As you well know, the 9-11 Truth Movement like everything else, has been well infiltrated by the banksters. The alternative media, like the Occupy Movement, American Civil Liberties Union and so much else, have been well poisoned, but still the voice of hope manages to survive somehow. Life literally is a Matrix. It is Alice in Wonderland. With so much beauty in the world, with so many good people, with the wonders of nature, I sometimes forget that all this evil is real. But the images of JFK, 9-11, the images of babies exposed to depleted uranium bombs, the images of ever lying politicians and Hollywood celebrities shilling for the banksters... that’s what keeps me so awake! I've already seen how your site has expanded 9-11, as indeed it should. It remains so far, so criminally monumental in false-flag events, but I fear the worst is yet to come. As with the loyal, dedicated supporters of the USS Liberty, JFK/RFK assassinations, plus all those who question Waco, Oklahoma City, London 7/7 bombings, Princess Diana, and so many other horrific world events, let alone the crimes of just Israel, it's an honour and privilege to have you as a fellow supporter and friend! Best to you Christopher as always, Graham Hill Comment: Dear Christopher: It was a great honor and pleasure for me to get a letter from you - many thanks! I look forward to receiving your two books on 9/11 which I already know will be the definitive works on the subject. While I believe that there is a place for research that delves into the mechanics of how the three towers were brought down (because that explanation exposes the official version as a preposterous lie), the identification of those responsible, and analysis of the agenda that those heinous attacks were intended to advance are infinitely more important goals of the quest for "9/11 truth". Question: A while back a reader sent me a very good question asking how the perpetrators of 9-11 can live with their guilt. I wasn't ready to answer it at the time and am no longer able to locate the original question. The reader was basically asking how the masterminds of the terror attacks of 9-11 can live with themselves after having committed such atrocities in which thousands of innocent people lost their lives? In July 2006, the former prime minister and leader of the Likud, Benjamin Netanyahu, attended a two-day 60th anniversary celebration of the King David Hotel bombing with former terrorists of the Irgun and Haganah. The event was organized by the Menachem Begin Heritage House, the University of Haifa, and the Association of IZL [Irgun] Fighters. The seminar was held "to mark the 60th anniversary of the bombing of the King David Hotel, Jerusalem, by members of the United Resistance Movement (Haganah and Irgun)," the Jerusalem Post noted in its pre-event notices. The Israeli newspaper specifically noted that members of the Haganah and Irgun had been involved in the terrorist bombing. Question: Why is it that you publish an article, “Why the Assange Case is Important” when many other well-known political commentators judge Wikileaks to be nothing more than a psy-ops operation or media disinformation? I see that our beloved country has lost most of the battle already, has been hijacked by foreign interests and our blood is being used to spill the blood of other innocents around the world. Our moral fiber has been so deeply corrupted that it is doubtful that we will rise up to revolt in time. I love the Constitution and I prize my freedom, but there is not much left of either one at this point. At least now I know what is killing us. I pray that there will be enough of a spark alive in American hearts to pull us out of this in time. Thank you for your courage. Thank you for your thoroughness. Thank you for keeping yourself and your family safe while bringing us this essential message. God bless and keep you and your family safe. 1. Al Qaeda did it all and just some rumors were perceived by intelligence agencies. You lean towards theory No. 3, whereas I am a strong believer in theory No. 2. Why? Question: For quite a few years I've been wondering how we will ever be successful in exposing these potent truths that would so much move our world in a positive direction - exposing once and for all the tragic use of false false terror. I would love to see the movement address this question of how are we going to achieve a this much needed breakthrough. It seems like while the case to disprove the official story gets more solid the 9/11 Truth movement as a whole is declining. Bollyn Responds: This is probably the most commonly asked question about 9-11, and happens to be a very timely one in light of the recently released Pentagon report about the Air Force mortuary at Dover AFB where, it turns out, unidentified human remains from Shanksville and the Pentagon wound up being disposed of in a landfill. I have written about the deception that evidently occurred at Shanksville in an article entitled The Shanksville Deception of 9-11. Although I cannot say for certain what happened to the passengers and crews from the Boston flights of 9-11, I can say what I think may have happened based on the evidence. Wallace Miller, the coroner of Somerset County, is protesting the Pentagon report that says that human remains from Shanksville were taken to Dover AFB. He also claims that all the remains from Flight 93 were identified. This can only be explained by the fact that Miller was not part of the recovery effort from the large debris field that was about 100 meters in the woods. Miller had previously told the press that he stopped being a coroner after about 20 minutes at the crater in the reclaimed mine because there were no body parts to be seen. This is probably true because it was from the large debris field around the cabin of Barry Hoover that the human remains that were taken to Dover AFB were found. Now, ask yourself, why would the FBI not allow the local coroner, who had legal responsibility for the crime scene, to be part of the recovery effort from the debris field? What was in the debris field that had to be hidden from the county coroner? The local coroner and other authorities were probably kept away from the real debris field because the number of individuals on the plane that was evidently shot down over Shanksville is much larger than the 44 who are said to have been on Flight 93. The local coroner could simply not be allowed to see the real debris field. I think what may have happened was a sleight-of-hand trick in which the Boston passengers were put together on another flight out of Boston that landed at Cleveland airport, as Flight 93 reportedly did. These people were then put on the plane that was shot down over Shanksville. This would explain the unidentified human remains from Shanksville and why the real debris field in the woods was kept secret. To understand the details of the 9-11 deception at Shanksville, I recommend reading my articles: The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93, Was Flight 93 Shot Down?, Eyewitnesses Saw Military Aircraft at Scene of Flight 93, and The Shanksville Deception of 9-11. Question: What are the characteristics of a False Front?
The same holds true for all such operations, such as false front nationalist, patriotic, or radical websites and publications. If the people who run the operation do not seem like they fit, it may be that the operation is a false front scam. Question: What is your take on Israel and Iran? I think it is all bluster from all sides to stir up support at home. I can't see them really starting a pre-emptive war in an election year. I can't see the U.S. military going willingly into that hornet's nest.
The fact of the matter is that the war against Iran is already underway. The punitive sanctions against Iran, dictated by the Zionist war lobby, are a tactic of economic warfare. The Zionist establishment has been pushing hard for war with Iran for several years. The anti-Iranian sanctions and propaganda are very similar to what organized Jewry did when it declared war on Germany in 1933. Although it took 6 more years for the war to begin, it finally came to all-out war with millions killed and much of Europe destroyed. The noble lie is anything but noble. The idea is mostly associated with government, for good reason. Government lies to us to manipulate public opinion to bring about certain results, like war and wealth redistribution. Comment: People like you and I are working towards fixing serious problems. A lot of the people who have caused these problems are being compensated via taxpayers' funds. So how much more do people like you and I deserve to be compensated for exposing these problems so that they can be solved? Bollyn Responds: This is an excellent comment because it goes directly to the question of what is the value of the truth in an era of lies? Should one even expect any compensation for bringing the truth to the public? I can report that during the fall of 2011, the 10th anniversary of 9/11, donations from readers averaged less than $10 per day. Obviously, if Bollyn.com were a business I would have had to close up shop a long time ago. I cover the bulk of my costs and maintain my website out of my own pocket and have done so for years. Bollyn.com is not a business, but a mission. I cannot be indifferent to the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 that resulted in the mass murder of thousands of my fellow citizens. I cannot abide wars of aggression and conquest based on these lies. I do what I can to bring the truth out in order to liberate my nation from the twin yoke of deception and slavery. When you see a well-funded website that claims to be giving you the truth, ask yourself how is it funded, and by whom? Is there any transparency in the financing of the operation? I am a one-man operation and I am fortunate to have the support of a few concerned and generous citizens. I am motivated to maintain Bollyn.com solely by my desire to see truth and justice prevail. I will continue my work as long as I can -- and so long as God wills it. Comment: It was so nice to log on to your page and see a call for paper ballots. I've been saying it ever since 2004, and to be honest, never gave it thought before that - I thought the hanging chad thing was a bit foolish, and I was glad, at that time, that Bush was elected since Gore was ready to slam Kyoto down our throats. But with the exit polls at 2004 being so far off, I knew that the machines were rigged, and having done a little programming myself, I could understand how easy it would be to hijack votes on a touchscreen voting system. So yes, to get back to government of, for, and by [the people], we definitely need to return to accountable balloting. Let's pray it makes some inroads in the psyche of the under-educated in this country.
I point this out because it is important to understand that the Zionist criminal network in the United States works hand-in-glove with the Israelis and has done so since the 1940s - before the creation of the State of Israel. When I say Zionist criminal network I am not using hyperbole. I am referring to the Jewish Zionist gangsters who have long controlled whole sections of the U.S. economy, such as the media, Hollywood, New York City and Washington, D.C. The Israelis usually handle the operations side while the American Zionists act as financiers and front men, as Pipes does in MEF. This is the same combination that carried out 9/11. Question: "Aren't you going to print your book on 9/11?" a supporter asked the other day.
The letter from the reader begins... Bollyn Responds: I have written a series of articles about the serious health damage caused by exposure to depleted uranium. The whole series of six articles based on original research can be read here: http://www.bollyn.com/depleted-uranium
Bollyn Responds: The Perry piece, “The U.S. Must Support Israel at the U.N.” was actually published the previous day in the Jerusalem Post under the rubric, “Comment: The Palestinians’ illegitimate UN gambit” on 15 September 2011.
In the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, the Rothschilds made a high art out of deliberately provoking wars and revolutions. This furthered the Jewish Messianic goal of destroying the Gentile nations and supplanting them with universal Jewish rule. It also enabled the Rothschilds to further the Jewish Messianic goal of concentrating the wealth of the world in Jewish hands. By the 1870s, the Rothschilds had accumulated at least $3,400,000,000.00. [USD non-adjusted] Question: There is a Toronto Hearing on 9/11 being held very shortly. Presumably this represents the key figures regarding 9/11 (see http://torontohearings.org/). I am wondering if you are participating, and what your standing is with them? Are you completely ostracized by the "mainstream" 911rs? Bollyn Responds: Yes, I am aware of the Toronto Hearings conference about 9/11. I was not invited, which is not unusual. My analysis of Israeli involvement in 9/11 is strictly taboo in such forums. Canada is, after all, a partner in the War on Terrorism.
Bollyn Responds: Kevin, why do you use a question mark? Murdoch is obviously "the key figure" in spreading the 9/11 deception propaganda to the public. The current Murdoch scandal about phone hacking is just the tip of the iceberg, of course. When Ed Miliband of the Labour Party calls for the break-up of News Corp., you know there are much bigger fish to be fried. Rupert Murdoch has evidently served his purpose - the global deception of 9/11 - but his son of an Estonian mother will certainly not do for the Zionist masters behind Murdoch. This is exactly what I had in mind when I wrote this last year: Bollyn Responds: I am very glad to hear from the relatives and families of the 9/11 victims. The 9/11 relatives have certainly been treated extremely badly in the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein and there is only one family left in the litigation process -- although there has been no 9/11 trial after nearly 10 years! I have done what I could to help the relatives by showing them the prejudice and conflict of interest that exists in the Zionist-controlled court of Judge Hellerstein. As one might have expected from a judge who is a Zionist partisan, the key Israeli Mossad defendant, International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS NV), has been excused from the tort litigation. This is the Israeli "airport security" company that controlled passenger screening operations at Boston's Logan Airport -- and while they are responsible for allegedly allowing knife-wielding terrorists onto the planes on 9/11, they have been excused. Go figure.
Hightower's Message to Bollyn News Report of 9/11 by: 9News Staff Hightower confirmed that his father, William Donald Hightower worked at Ames from 1963 through 1988. If I consider his "nanothermite challenge" worth discussing, I will do so on another page.
When John F. Kennedy, Jr. and his girlfriend died in the plane crash, JFK, Jr was also buried at sea by the U.S. military. I don't remember the media ever explaining why the U.S. Navy would bury JFK, Jr. at sea because JFK, Jr. wasn't a military or government official. I don't know if the Kennedy family asked for JFK, Jr. to be buried at sea. Question: "[Robert A.] Kelman was general manager of Hugo Neu, the company who managed the destruction of 250,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center by sending it to Asian smelters." Thank you for your article, especially your focus on the removal of steel evidence. One point I have never seen mentioned is that these tons of materials were shipped out within a few weeks of 9/11. Shipping this huge amount of steel would take months of planning - transporting it from the WTC site to ships, reserving the ships, setting up receiving stations in Asia, etc. How was this gargantuan task accomplished so quickly? I hope your book covers this; no one has researched this aspect of the hoax.
Bollyn Responds: Thank you for this link. I don't know if the Stuxnet worm played a role in the nuclear disaster in Japan, but I do believe that Stuxnet is very similar to the malicious code (see Ptech, etc.) that infected and affected the efficiency of critical U.S. computer systems on 9/11. Stuxnet has been described as having been able to make the Iranian centrifuges run amok while the computer monitors indicated that all was well. This is exactly the kind of deception that happened on 9/11 when critical NORAD and FAA computer systems failed to notice the errant aircraft and respond properly to the threats. In a 15 January 2011 article entitled "Israeli Test on Worm Called Crucial in Iran Nuclear Delay" the New York Times reported that Stuxnet was tested at the Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona in the Negev. The paper reported that Israel had built an elaborate test facility at their secret and illegal nuclear weapons site that contained a replica array of the Iranian uranium enrichment plant, adding that such a test site would have been necessary for the design of the attack software. Richard Falkenrath, a principal at the Chertoff Group (headed by the high-level Israeli agent Michael Chertoff), actually appeared on Bloomberg television saying that he believed that Israel was behind Stuxnet. It should be noted that there was a very similar, but less well known computer crime involved in the 9/11 terror attacks, in which the Mossad and the Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona were also involved. To understand how Israeli intelligence was able to gain control of the U.S. military computer systems I recommend reading my chapter on "The Architecture of Terror", especially the part about the Israeli Amit Yoran, the former cyber-security czar of the Pentagon. The "rebellion" is the result of the global elites harnessing the Libyan inter tribal East/West dissension for their own agenda. The long term goal is likely the Islamisation of the Middle East and North Africa to present the Israel/US/EU axis powers with a strong enemy to justify homeland oppression. Question from U.S.A. - I was just reading your articles on Libya. I was absolutely sad as can be today, could not stop crying since I know that innocent men, women, children and babies will be murdered by the attack, not to mention the DU [depleted uranium] that will contaminate the air, water, and soil in Libya forever.
This is why I am not optimistic that there will be an investigation of 9/11 in the United States anytime soon. It would probably require a real revolution to oust the financial regime behind the government before the U.S. government would be able to really investigate and expose what happened on 9/11. This is not to say that we will not know who was behind 9/11, only that the truth will not be accepted by those in power. To understand why it is so difficult for 9/11 truth seekers to investigate and prosecute the real criminals behind the false-flag terrorism we need to understand that this is an asymetrical struggle between individual truth seekers and very powerful non-democratic institutions. The main institutions that are opposed to 9/11 truth are Zionist-controlled entities such as the Anti-Defamation League (and its parent organization of Jewish Freemasons - the B'nai B'rith), the State of Israel (and its military intelligence agencies), the New York Times, CNN, the BBC, the Department of Justice (and F.B.I.), the C.I.A., and the President of the United States, to name but a few.
I grew up in Norman Rockwell's America with a strong belief in our inalienable rights and the freedom of speech, a freedom I was known to exercise frequently. My 9/11 research and journalism are a result of my belief as an American that I have the right to express my thoughts without fear of reprisal. The brutal assault I suffered by undercover police at my home in August 2006 and the malicious prosecution that followed showed me that there are corrupt officials in my hometown (virtually all of them) that were willing to violate my constitutional rights (a federal crime) and commit perjury in court in order to play their role in a conspiracy to try to silence me. As a consequence, I lost my job as a journalist and we had to leave our home but I have not lost my belief in the freedom of speech. I know that the truth will prevail and in time we will know who committed the false-flag terrorism of 9/11. We will see that those who attacked me and tortured me with a TASER as they broke my arm in front of my wife and 8-year-old daughter were actually taking orders and committing crimes for those who are behind the 9/11 cover up. Question: I am sure you know this creep Mike Harari (who is said to be behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11). But what do you make of this from Veterans Today? Dimitri Khalezov...has revealed from first-hand knowledge that Mike Harari organized the 9-11 massacre...His explanation is devastating in its simplicity. The conversion of three steel-built skyscrapers to fine powder is only possible with nuclear explosions underneath them. Thermite, nano-thermite and thermate may well have been used by the killers to cut beams and girders but they would not have turned concrete to powder, or steel for that matter. Bollyn Responds: Mike Harari is certainly in that group of senior Mossad terrorists who are involved as high-level managers of the 9/11 attacks. This is the group of Israelis that was involved in Iran-Contra and drug smuggling operations from the 1970s. This is the link to the Bush and Clinton families, and why Marc Rich was involved in the destruction of the steel from the WTC. Question: I was curious to know if you have completed the final chapter in your 9/11 book? It is a fantastic read. Hope all is well.
One of the Polish Jews who tortured and killed hundreds of innocent Germans was Solomon "Shlomo" Morel, who has lived in Israel since 1993 to avoid prosecution for war crimes. The following extract is from Solomon Morel: A Jewish Death Camp Commandant in Stalinist Poland
"Morel brought Jewish and Polish guards -- sometimes drunken -- into barrack 7 of accused Nazis or Hitler youth. It was called either the Deutsches Haus or the “brown barracks.” Morel had them sing Nazi songs and then he began to beat them. Depending upon his mood, he would use his bare hands, a wooden stool, a pistol butt or a truncheon. The guards beat the Germans with clubs. Morel asked, “How many blows do you want?” If the answer was unsatisfactory, it was fifty blows. It was reported that the “ritual of the organized tormenting of prisoners took place virtually every night…” When using the wooden stool, Morel would beat prisoners until the stool broke apart. The corpses were left on the floor. At dawn, they were taken in a horse-drawn cart to a cemetery by the Rawa river where they were dumped into a mass grave." Question: If the Jews can create such a complex matrix then they must be really very smart. It would, of course, require lots of brains apart from lots of money to pull off such a veil [of deception] over the whole world. But is it also because they (the orthodox Zionist Jews) have a complete lack of ethics? By the way, I’m a Hindu from India and I don't think ALL JEWS are bad.
The photo of the three men who manage the Obama administration huddled around the president's desk says a great deal about the powers that control the Obama White House. Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is an Israeli national whose father is a former Zionist terrorist in the Irgun. David Axelrod is the son of a Jewish communist writer who wrote for a magazine that was designed to push the United States into war against Germany. The third man at the desk is Philip Michael Schiliro, the president's assistant on legislation and the key person in getting Democrats in Congress to support the huge bailout bill that was passed in the beginning of the Obama administration.
Phil Schiliro is a very interesting name in Obama's administration, the current government of the Zionist crimocracy that rules the United States. The Schiliro clan is a family that has a long history of involvement in organized crime. One member of the family, Lewis Dennis Schiliro, actually ran the FBI office in New York City during the 1990s - overseeing such key investigations as the first bombing of the World Trade Center, other terrorism and financial crime cases, TWA Flight 800, Egypt Air 990, etc. Another member of the family, 30-year-old Joseph Schiliro from East Meadow, Long Island, was busted in January 2010 for being part of a network of drug dealers that dealt $1 million of "Special-K" (Ketamine, an animal tranquilizer) every month. Are these Schiliros all related? I would venture to guess that they are.
Lewis Dennis Schiliro and Phil Schiliro grew up on the same part of Long Island, East Meadow and Baldwin respectively (5 miles apart from each other), and both have mothers named Jean and fathers named Joseph. I have not yet determined if they are related, but I suspect they are. There were, after all, only 55 people named Schiliro in the United States in 1930 and most of them were directly related to each other. This is a very important question because Lewis Schiliro became a senior vice president at Maurice Greenberg's A.I.G. insurance shortly after he left the FBI in 2000 and Phil Schiliro was instrumental in getting Congress to pass the legislation that provided hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to bailout criminal banks and enterprises like A.I.G. - the largest direct recipient of the bailout. Furthermore, the FBI is the most important part of the 9/11 cover-up and Lewis Schiliro has actively contributed to that effort. In the New Year I will return to the Schiliro connection to 9/11 and the bailout of A.I.G. Now back to the question at hand: If the Jews can create such a complex matrix then they must be really very smart. It would, of course, require lots of brains apart from lots of money to pull off such a veil [of deception] over the whole world. But is it also because they (the orthodox Zionist Jews) have a complete lack of ethics? The discussion of this photo and the men who manage the Obama White House is not a digression, but is meant to serve as an illustration to help understand my response to this question. Americans in the 21st Century are not very political nor are they politically organized in any meaningful way. Millions of Americans voted for Barack Obama simply because he symbolized "change", which most people thought was a good idea. They thought he was a black man from Chicago, although he is not from Chicago and he is as much white as he is black. Most people do not look any deeper than the images they see on television. Very few are aware of the fact that Obama is a Zionist-controlled puppet, a modern-day "golem", whose only agenda is to fulfill the wishes of his Jewish Zionist masters.
Jews are certainly as smart and as wealthy as any other ethnic group but these are not the only things that make up Jewish political power. The real essence of Jewish political power is that they operate as a collective, which is to say that they work together as an organized team. Wealthy Jews like the Rothschilds create and finance Zionist organizations - including secret societies - to increase their power and control. Zionist Jews have a virtual monopoly over the U.S. media. Jews dominate the political parties and media in the United States - including third party movements and alternative media outlets. Ownership of the media and Zionist secret societies like the International Order of B'nai B'rith are huge force multipliers for Zionist Jews. No other ethnic group in the United States operates as a collective as effectively as the Jews. In a nation of politically unorganized people, a well-organized and well-financed collective force (with powerful secret societies) like the Zionist Jews can slice its way through like a warm knife going through butter. It's that simple, but there is much more. As a student of Middle Eastern history and U.S. politics, I have pondered this question for many years, as have many others before me. To understand the Jewish posture vis-a-vis the rest of the world I suggest reading how Tacitus and Gibbon, two classical historians, described the hostility of the "unsocial" Jewish religion and how Jews regard the rest of mankind: Moses, wishing to secure for the future his authority over the nation, gave them a novel form of worship, opposed to all that is practiced by other men. Things sacred with us, with them have no sanctity, while they allow what with us is forbidden…This worship, however introduced, is upheld by its antiquity; all their other customs, which are at once perverse and disgusting, owe their strength to their very badness. The most degraded out of other races, scorning their national beliefs, brought to them their contributions and presents. This augmented the wealth of the Jews, as also did the fact, that among themselves they are inflexibly honest and ever ready to shew compassion, though they regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies. The Roman historian Tacitus said the Jews "regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies" and Edward Gibbon (who called their religion "unsocial") said they are "a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind." The hostility that orthodox Jews harbor for non-Jews is key to understanding the Jewish predicament: the Jews see themselves as a people apart from others, a separate nation, and their first loyalty and obligation is to their tribe. Orthodox Jews are raised with the idea that Jews are superior to other people. This sense of Jewish supremacism and hostility toward other people is the reason the Jewish religion is seen as unsocial by Gibbon and others. Like Hinduism, the Jewish religion is a set of rules of conduct for a specific ethnic group. Christianity and Islam, on the other hand, are faith-based universal religions which embrace all of mankind.
Question: I have received two questions about Mark Lane and American Free Press (AFP). Since they both pertain to the Liberty Lobby and its publications, I will answer them together: Question No. 1 - Subject: Mark Lane: CIA agent I'm familiar with these charges by Bollyn. His problem is that Lane has been proven correct about Lee Oswald and if Piper indeed works for Lane, then how does Bollyn explain the most important book on the JFK killing, Final Judgment, which is the only book to nail the Israelis for being part of the assassination? That's where Bollyn's thesis falls down. My main problem with Lane is with his presence at Jonestown, but I have read nothing definitive about it other than his being the lawyer for Jones. Lane's probably lucky he wasn't killed, too, which is why I suppose he disappeared for a while. I suspect it was a CIA mass murder of an experimental population. I'm not ready to accept Bollyn's version without more than just his being a Jewish lawyer who successfully defended Liberty Lobby from a CIA lawsuit, which is not a bad thing. Question No. 2 – From an AFP insider named George K. I am working now at the AFP office and keep bumping onto all kinds of unreasonable hysteria around...Paul (Tudor) Angel, Chris Petherick and Mike Piper presenting me with all kinds of s....t that I am not really looking for. What is going on here? It feels like I stepped into a hole loaded with sneaks. I feel something far deeper than the usual "don't take my job or I kill you" garbage. Paul Angel keeps screwing my articles, he is steering the whole of the AFP toward the left...Willis is unable to control them...Is this new or just an old story? What did actually happen around you, why did they want you out so bad? Bollyn Responds: These questions pertain to my former employer, the Liberty Lobby, and its publications, American Free Press (the erstwhile Spotlight) and the Barnes Review. Having worked for the Liberty Lobby from June 2000 until October 2006, I have some insight into the organization and the people behind it. Let me begin with a few facts and observations. I am an honest and hard-working investigative journalist who worked for the Liberty Lobby’s publications from June 2000 until October 6, 2006. While working for the Spotlight and American Free Press, I did a great deal of original research on 9/11, depleted uranium weapons, school shootings, and electronic vote fraud, among other things. In mid-August 2006 I was assaulted at my home (on private property) by a heavily armed three-man squad of undercover police who TASERed me (while I was handcuffed and held down by two armed men) and broke my right elbow. Willis A. Carto of American Free Press began collecting money for a “legal defense fund” and encouraged me to take Mark Lane as my lawyer. When I spoke to Lane on the phone, he told me that I would have to trust him completely and admitted that he was a Zionist. I decided to look for another lawyer.
Shortly after the attack, Mike Piper of AFP began attacking me and insisted that I not be allowed to speak at the Labor Day conference in Washington. In early October 2006 I was fired from AFP by Chris Petherick who claimed that I had been disloyal to the paper and filed false stories. He never provided any evidence to support these claims. Carto disposed of the money raised for my legal fund and I was purged from American Free Press in the same way that Stalin would purge someone from the Communist Party - and the memory of the Soviet Union. I have been subjected to a vicious campaign of slander from Mike Piper and his cronies ever since. While it may be difficult for an outsider to make sense of all of this, as a person who worked for the Liberty Lobby for more than 6 years and who was then ousted and slandered by the people I had worked with, I have some insight into this odd outfit that calls itself a “populist” newspaper. Mark Weber wrote about Willis Carto and the Liberty Lobby in August 1998: Although Liberty Lobby claims to reveal the hidden forces that secretly control the world, it never discloses just who runs this self-described "populist institution," or how. Even the name is deceitful. Liberty Lobby does almost no lobbying. In fact, Liberty Lobby is essentially a fraud. Although it claims to be directed by its "Board of Policy," it is actually run from behind the scenes by Willis A. Carto -- a shadowy 72-year-old whom a California court has found to be a crook and a liar. Weber is right. I should know, I was the lobbyist for the Liberty Lobby. I was the “Congressional Liaison” when I began working at the Liberty Lobby, which meant that I was to visit the offices of members of Congress on behalf of the lobby and write articles about legislation. There was, however, no structure or instructions for this position whatsoever and I was free to pursue whatever issue I chose. I never received any guidance or met anyone who represented the membership or Board of Policy of the Liberty Lobby except for Willis Carto, whose office was adjacent to mine. There was a door in the wall between our offices and it was always open, except when Carto had meetings with Mark Lane and the accountant, a man named Blayne Hutzel, who wore a Masonic ring. The offices we worked in were dismal and dirty, far below standard for any organization calling itself a newspaper. I found it impossible to work in such conditions and asked Mr. Carto if I could freshen up my office with some cleaning and a new coat of paint. He refused, saying that if I fixed up my office the others would also want their offices cleaned up. In the fall of 2000, after about five months on the job, I was suddenly given a new contract that made me an independent contractor. Mr. Carto gave me this contract to sign while Mark Lane stood in the next room. This new arrangement meant that I lost all insurance benefits and was paid to submit articles. I was responsible for managing my own taxes. Hutzel told me that I should get a "good tax man". This arrangement, which I knew nothing about prior to seeing the contract in front of me, allowed me to work from home but meant a significant reduction in compensation. Later, between 2004 and 2006, Carto reduced my salary even further, twice, in cuts of 10 percent each. He also wanted me to come back to Washington and be the lobbyist for the Lobby. I didn't understand this because I thought our main activity was the newspaper business. I was under the impression that AFP was created to be a real newspaper and not a newsletter of the Liberty Lobby. Furthermore, I did not understand how they were unable to grow the paper in post-9/11 America. Whenever I passed Union Station in Washington I would check to see if there were papers in the boxes, and there were not. I spoke to the employee who was supposed to distribute the papers to the boxes and found that he was not doing it. The paid circulation was only about 20,000, according to the person who managed the subscription data base. The paper was clearly not growing and there was no movement in that direction coming from the employees, who seemed to lack any enthusiasm or patriotic zeal. In January 2006, shortly after I had spoken about the evidence of Thermite at the World Trade Center at the Axis for Peace forum in Brussels, I was suddenly called back from Germany to go on a crazy mission to Venezuela. This hare-brained scheme originated with Carto and Piper, but Piper did not want to do it - so he put it on me. I was supposed to go to Venezuela and arrange a meeting with Hugo Chavez. I was to get Chavez to buy subscriptions to the newspaper for every member of Congress or somehow get him to make a significant donation to the Liberty Lobby. Nothing had been done to prepare for such a mission and very little was explained to me, but the whole thing was dropped on my shoulders. Nobody had even made contact with the Embassy of Venezuela in Washington. I could see that the chances for success were slim, but was willing to give it a shot. The day I left for Venezuela, Carto told me that I would get ten percent of whatever I could get from Chavez. Nothing was put down in writing.
I did not get to see Hugo Chavez, but turned over a package of materials to the Ministry of Information in Caracas when I realized that we (I had invited William Rodriguez and Jimmy Walter to come along) would not have a chance to speak to the president directly. I returned to Washington and headed for Utah to interview Dr. Steven E. Jones on the evidence of Thermite at the World Trade Center.
Although I have written about a number of sensitive subjects, it seems like my articles and discussion of Thermite in the World Trade Center were too hot for the people who controlled American Free Press. Having left Chicago because of intrusive FBI surveillance in the summer of 2005, we were reluctant to stay in our own home. Feeling vulnerable in our home, we visited 9/11 relatives and researchers in the western United States and stayed in safe places. AFP had limited me to one thousand dollars in expenses per month, but I was able to keep my costs down by staying with people who supported 9/11 truth. I was in Davis, California, in June 2006 when Petherick suddenly cut off my expenses completely telling me that I would no longer have any funds for travel, phone calls, or any expenses at all. This happened the day after I had merged the scientific research of Dr. Steven E. Jones with that of Dr. Thomas Cahill at U.C. Davis. The research of these two men confirmed that some form of Thermite had been used to destroy the Twin Towers. Cahill's data from the smoke particles rising from the pile of rubble from October through December 2001 proved that the fires that raged beneath the pile were hotter than the boiling point of iron!
We now had scientific proof that we were dealing with extremely advanced Thermitic explosives. The fact that I was being squeezed by my employers at AFP at the same time I was making scientific breakthroughs on the evidence of Thermite suggests the two are related. When AFP cut off my expenses completely they knew I would have to return to my home, where undercover police were waiting to attack.
I brought this material back to Dr. Jones in Provo, who had asked me to find out whatever I could about the dust. He was very glad to get this material. I bid him a fond farewell in June and warned him of the dangers we faced. Within three months we were both fired from our jobs.
After being fired from American Free Press in October 2006, I learned that Mark Lane is the real owner of the Liberty Lobby and its assets, and has been since 1994. This information came from L.T. Patterson of Cincinnati, owner of the newsletter Criminal Politics. Patterson had been sued by Mark Lane in an attempt to shut down his newspaper and discovered that Lane owned the Liberty Lobby during the legal process. Mark Lane served in U.S. Army intelligence in Germany at the end of the war. Army intelligence became the CIA after the war. Lane played a key role in the Jonestown massacre by pushing the fear button on Jim Jones, which instigated the massacre. Lane is the controlling agent of American Free Press, which pushes the fear button of patriotic Americans every week. Lane was also involved in the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, where he worked closely with Jane Fonda. Later, Fonda married Ted Turner and convinced him to sell CNN to Zionist Jews in New York. This completed the Zionist monopoly of the mass media in the United States. The information about Lane owning the Liberty Lobby came as a surprise, but made complete sense and fit with what I had observed at the Liberty Lobby. There was absolutely no transparency about the finances at the lobby. I remember in 2000-2001 seeing 4 women opening the mail with donations in Blayne Hutzel’s office. Elisabeth Carto and her sister were the ones who ran the daily counting of the donations that came in the mail. I never understood where all that money went because it certainly was not being spent on the employees or the operation, which all ran on a shoe-string budget. Jerry Myers told me that the Cartos had secret bank accounts in Switzerland and Austria. There were certainly many shell companies controlled by Willis Carto. My paychecks, for example, came from an entity called the Committee to Expose Bunk. None of this was ever explained. Myers, an old hand at the lobby, told me a lot of the sordid history about the lobby and I knew it was a very secretive and dodgy operation, but I was glad to be able to write articles about things that mattered and see them in print in the nation's capital. It always bothered me that the distribution of the paper was very poor. The paper was not easily available even in downtown Washington, D.C. It was not even sold in the newspaper shop across the street from the Liberty Lobby. There was clearly a problem with the way the paper was being run. The main people on the production side of the paper were Paul Tudor Angel and Chris Petherick. Petherick was the editor and Angel did the layout. Chris Petherick was a self-proclaimed Satanist who wore a metal stud in his tongue and threw knives in the wall of the office. I never understood how he wound up being the editor of a populist and supposedly patriotic newspaper. He didn’t seem to fit. I was invited to visit Paul Angel’s new house in Virginia toward the end of my career at AFP. He had bought a newly built house about 45 minutes south of Washington on the Interstate. He had married a Panamanian girl who worked at Lockheed and we were invited to see the new house and his baby girl. I was surprised when his wife said, “You don’t believe the stuff that’s in that paper, do you?” Paul chipped in saying that I was one of the paper’s main writers, but I could see that his wife dismissed AFP as nonsense, which made me wonder why Paul worked so hard for Willis Carto and the Liberty Lobby. During the party, I spoke with Paul’s mother, Alice Jones Angel. She mentioned that Paul’s father had died some years earlier. Paul’s father was a chiropractor based in Silver Spring, Maryland, named Dr. Harold H. Angel who was a governor of Optimist International. Harold Angel died in 1972 when Paul was about 12. Paul was still living with his mother when I started at the paper in 2000, and she drove him to the office. Alice Angel died in February 2009. She had worked at the Department of Health and Human Services. Paul has two sisters, Alison P. Angel and Laura Angel-Hanratty. Alison had a career at the U.S. Information Agency and Laura is married to Dennis P. Hanratty, Security Manager of the Department of Defense and member of the board of the Defense and Intelligence Council of ASIS International, an agency that is closely tied to the U.S. Intelligence community. I suspect that Angel's family ties to the military and intelligence community are why Paul Angel is the driving force behind the production of American Free Press. I remember how he and Petherick refused to print my articles that discussed the role of Prozac and similar drugs in school shootings and sedating the 9/11 relatives. "Nice try" is all Paul Angel wrote back when I submitted a story about Prozac-crazed school shooters in America. Both Petherick and Angel told me that they did drugs when I began at the Liberty Lobby in 2000, but they did not mean marijuana. The people behind American Free Press are there simply to control the patriotic movement. They are skimming the cream off of the movement and have done nothing to make it an effective opposition movement. Jerry Myers told me that the Liberty Lobby had paid Mark Lane some five million dollars in legal fees. Mark Weber was correct in his analysis of 1998: Carto has few personal friends, but perhaps his closest is Mark Lane, an East coast Jewish attorney who often represents Carto and Liberty Lobby in court. Lane has a long record of support for liberal and leftist figures, including Martin Luther King and Jim Jones (of Jonestown fame). According to legal documents filed by Liberty Lobby in May 1998, Liberty Lobby pays Lane an annual retainer of $92,500. Question: How do you compare Camp Bucca to a concentration camp? No one was executed there. People were given more medical care than they had anywhere else in their country, including kidney transplants. Personally, I ensure that people held in the area I was responsible for were given education by local Iraqis: reading, writing, some basic social studies. With the exception of those transferred to Iraqi run prisons, all of the people were released. I completely understand the unpopular war, and the hindsight view of many things, but to compare Camp Bucca to a concentration camp, it's not even a stretch. Please reconsider your analogy. - W. K. Bollyn Responds: When I received this comment, I immediately posted a "Note on usage" at the bottom of the article about the Iraq War Logs about the meaning of the term "concentration camp." There is much more to this comment than the question about the meaning of the term and I am in contact with W.K. to discuss these things. I don't want anyone to think that I was using hyperbole in calling Camp Bucca a "modern day concentration camp". I was not. Having visited Dachau, Auschwitz, and Buchenwald, I know what I am talking about when I use the term. This is how the term is defined in the Oxford dictionary at our home: concentration camp - a type of prison, often consisting of a number of buildings inside a fence, where political prisoners are kept in extremely bad conditions The following photos and text are taken from the end of my article on the Iraq War Logs, which were leaked to the media by WikiLeaks on October 22, 2010:
Gen. David H. Petraeus described a concentration camp when he talked about Camp Bucca in 2007: "When I took command of Multinational Force-Iraq in February 2007, we still had Camp Bucca with 17,000 detainees at that time and it grew larger," said Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander, International Security Assistance Force and commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan. "We still had all of the detainees in huge enclosures. It was just fenced-in enclosures of about 800 to 900 detainees per enclosure. Obviously, we have come a long way since then." A concentration camp is defined by Merriam Webster as a camp where persons (as prisoners of war, political prisoners, or refugees) are detained or confined. The Holocaust Encyclopedia has the following definition, which correctly describes U.S. camps like Camp Bucca: The term concentration camp refers to a camp in which people are detained or confined, usually under harsh conditions and without regard to legal norms of arrest and imprisonment that are acceptable in a constitutional democracy. In Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1945, concentration camps (Konzentrationslager; KL or KZ) were an integral feature of the regime. Source: "Concentration Camps", Holocaust Encyclopedia, U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum
Question: We have all read about Barack Obama's intention to build an Islamic center near Ground Zero. This project does appear very suspicious. What, in your opinion, are the real motives behind such a controversial project? Bollyn Responds: BUILDING A MONUMENT TO A FALSEHOOD - This is a sophisticated propaganda ploy by the Rothschild/Zionist-controlled U.S. government and media, designed to underline and cement in the public mind the blatant falsehood that Muslims were responsible for the terror attacks of 9-11. This project is founded on the false premise of Muslim guilt and is meant to create a permanent monument to the falsehood that 9-11 was carried out by Islamic terrorists. The people behind this project are the high-level Rothschild agents involved in the Zionist false-flag terrorism and cover-up of 9-11, including New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch, whose sprawling media empire has pushed the lies about 9-11and the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The political support from the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton for this monument reveals it to be a nefarious Zionist plot to hijack the discussion about 9-11 by distracting the public from the real evidence and stirring up anti-Muslim feelings as the ninth anniversary nears. The recent knife attack on the Moslem taxi driver in Manhattan is the kind of reaction such evil plots produce.
The Israeli government's plan to destroy two mosques on the West Bank is a similar action of the same strategy, which is meant to cause violence and increase tension and hostility against Islam. The Israeli announcement of the outrageous plan to destroy the mosques, which are on Palestinian administered territory in the West Bank, is clearly designed to scuttle - with violence - the planned peace talks in September. Why else would they even consider taking such a unnecessary, self-defeating, and provocative action at this crucial time, especially during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan? Tibor Rosenbaum, a MOSSAD agent and head of the Geneva based Banque du Credit International. This bank was the forerunner to the notorious Bank of Credit and Commerce international (BCCI) which is a major intelligence drug money laundering bank. 'Life' magazine exposed Rosenbaum's bank as a money launderer for the Meyer Lanksky American organised crime family and Tibor Rosenbaum funded and supported 'Permindex' the MI6 assassination unit which was at the heart of the John F. Kennedy assassination. Source: "MI6 Are The Lords of the Global Drug Trade", by James Casbolt (Former MI6 Agent c. 2006) http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4540 When Rosenbaum’s criminal bank (where Zakheim worked) was exposed in the mainstream media in 1975 (e.g. TIME magazine), Zakheim, an agent of the Rothschilds, was brought to Washington and began his new career as an associate analyst of National Security and International Affairs with the Congressional Budget Office. Who did a background check on Dov Zakheim? Zakheim’s most peculiar move from being a senior executive in a criminal Mossad banking enterprise to a position with the U.S. government happened under the reign of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the Rothschild's senior agent in the U.S. government.
At a restaurant in Iowa we talked with our waitress who had refused to go back to Iraq after the army had made her drive trucks up and down "suicide alley" - after they had coaxed her to sign up with a $10,000 bonus. She had been promised that she would have a safe secretarial job but soon found herself driving in fuel convoys on the most treacherous highway in Iraq. They had lied to her and when she came home for a visit, she refused to go back. The army wanted the $10,000 back. I know men who have committed mass murder. Two that come to mind were young men during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, twenty eight years ago. One was a young Israeli from Kibbutz Afikim in the Jordan Valley, where I worked as a lifeguard at the pool. I had known this fellow since he was about 13. His family had migrated to Israel from Argentina and he was a big and friendly boy, at least until he was forced to fight in Lebanon. Later, he confessed to me about the murders he had committed of whole families in Lebanon during the war. He had been a member of a tank crew and as they drove through Lebanon families would come out of their homes with white flags. He had been commanded to fire at them, which he did. He was very tormented by these unjustified killings and he needed to tell me what he had done. I felt sorry for him. More recently, I met a fellow who was involved in the massacre of Palestinians in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila. Again, without asking, this person told me what he had done. When he showed me his scars on his arms and told me that he had been in Sabra and Shatila, I was quite shocked. These massacres are among the most horrific war crimes committed by Israel during my life. This man was only 15 years old when he murdered many innocent people. He is a Maronite Christian who joined the Phalange (with Elie Hobeika's unit) when he was a 13-year-old boy. At that tender age, he was given military training in Israel at Nahariya in 1980. When the Phalange leader Bachir Gemayel was murdered on September 14, 1982, Ariel Sharon sent the Phalange into the Palestinian camps of West Beirut, which the Israeli forces had completely surrounded. The Phalangists, with assistance and support from Israeli forces, massacred with knives thousands of defenseless refugees during a period of three days. The 15-year-old had been deceived by Ariel Sharon and the Israeli Mossad that the Palestinians were responsible for the Gemayel murder. The Israeli military had trained this 13-year-old boy to kill and then used him to murder innocent Palestinians, a crime he will be burdened with forever. Bollyn Responds: This is a good point. First, this boy was only 13 when he was trained by Israelis in Israel. His Phalangist unit was given military training for three months in Nahariya. He was not trained to massacre Palestinians with knives, which is what he and his unit did in Sabra and Shatila. The Israelis cultivated Maronite hatred against the Palestinians with the murder of Bachir Gemayel, as well as previous massacres and killings. Elie Hobeika, the leader of the boy's militia unit, had secret information on what had really gone on in the camps and was ready to tell it to a court in Brussels when he was blown up in a huge car bomb in Lebanon. Of course the actions of the boy were criminal, but I consider the real criminals to be the ones who train 13-year-old Lebanese boys and arrange such massacres in the first place and that responsibility falls squarely on the Israeli military leadership, which was the occupying power controlling access to the camps.
Rothschild was sent into the B'nai B'rith shortly after its founding to launch a ''membership drive" because, as he himself put it, "the members were not all equally well educated and of far different mental capacities." In short, B'nai B'rith was not for just any Jew. Through Rothschild's building job, it was to become an intelligence executive body, whose leaders would subsequently play controlling roles in other British networks, directing the Abolitionist-Slaveholder confrontations of the 1840s and 1850s, the Secession of the South that produced the Civil War, the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, and numerous post-war destabilizations of the American Republic. - “B'nai B'rith, British Weapon Against America”, by Paul Goldstein, The Campaigner, December 1978 Revolutions are usually associated with violence, but they don't have to be. Since 1990, half the nations of Europe and Asia have gone through peaceful revolutions that replaced the former dictatorships of the once mighty Soviet Union. The apartheid regime of South Africa also came to an end without violence. The revolution to restore the sovereignty of the American people certainly need not be violent, and really should not be. This is an excellent question and most appropriate for July 4, when we celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which articulates the fundamental political philosophy of the American Revolution. I am in complete agreement with the signers of July 4, 1776: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
I think the American form of government, as enshrined in the Constitution, is a truly excellent system of government. The U.S. Constitution has been adopted by other nations. Switzerland, for example, used the U.S. Constitution as their model and it has worked very well. The primary difference is that in Switzerland the legislative branch has more power than the executive branch. They did not want an all-powerful president, which I think was a wise decision. In the United States, the executive branch has far too much power having taken over powers that rightfully belong with the people's representatives. The right to declare war, for example, belongs to the U.S. Congress - not the president. Question: RE: “Why Do Jews Commit Massacres?”
Sociopaths never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behavior as permissible. They may appear to be charming, but are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims. They have no problem lying and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. They can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises. They are unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them. They believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, and entitled to every wish. They show no sense of personal boundaries and have no concern for their impact on others. They may even state that their goal is to rule the world. Their goal is the enslavement of their victim(s) and they seek to exercise despotic control over every aspect of the victim's life. The sociopath does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed. A sociopath does not perceive that anything is wrong with them. There is a disregard for and violation of the right's of others, those right's considered normal by the local culture (or international law). ASPD is indicated by at least three of the following. I have indicated those behaviors which A. Repeated acts that could lead to arrest. ( B. Conning for pleasure or profit, repeated lying, or the use of aliases. ( C. Failure to plan ahead or being impulsive. ( D. Repeated assaults on others. ( E. Reckless when it comes to their or others safety. (The aggressive and illegal actions of the Israeli state put all Israelis and Jews at risk. They claim to be acting on behalf of the Jewish people but their reckless actions increase the dangers for all Jews, even those who have nothing to do with F. Poor work behavior or failure to honor financial obligations. ( G. Rationalizing the pain they inflict on others. ( If one considers the behavior of the state of Israel, as expressed through the actions and words of its leaders, especially since the late-1970s when the extreme right-wing Likud Party came to power, one can easily see that Israel – as a state – displays all the symptoms of antisocial personality disorder. It should be remembered that the Likud Party of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the political party of the former Irgun terrorists, headed by such notorious Zionist terrorists as Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir. A political party founded by mass murderers and terrorists certainly must be seen as having antisocial tendencies. Although many clinicians use the terms psychopath and sociopath interchangeably, a sociopath's criminal behavior is shaped by social forces and is the result of a dysfunctional environment, according to psychopath expert Robert Hare in his book Without Conscience. Orthodox Judaism as defined by the rabbis (i.e. Talmudic teaching) is the basis of the "antisocial religion," which is the origin of the "social forces" and "dysfunctional environment" behind the antisocial personality disorder of the state of The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies. Question: How do you prove if a person has been exposed to Depleted Uranium (DU) and what can a person do about the health problems it causes, such as brittle teeth? Does the Veterans Administration (VA) have a policy to help and compensate veterans? I am a retired Army officer, my son was in Iraq with the first group that went in. He was there for 13 months. His job included evacuation of blown out damaged and destroyed armor vehicles, artillery, and tanks from the battle field along with moving troops in and out the front lines. He has a series of health issues that I believe are a result of his time in Iraq (including brittle teeth since he returned) and it is taking a toll. I find it hard for the VA not to acknowledge there is a problem when there is so much documentation and research on the subject. Something needs to be done to help veterans like my son with this. Health Problems Associated with Depleted Uranium Source: http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/depleted_uranium/index.asp Although the VA claims it has found "no health problems" from DU exposure, the following section on VA Benefits certainly says otherwise: "Veterans who were exposed to depleted uranium during military service may be eligible for health care benefits." The VA also says it provides "disability compensation benefits for disabilities that VA determines are associated with depleted uranium exposure."
While Hufschmid has not attacked me as maliciously as the others, he has made the ridiculous claim since the summer of 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Mossad. Using this bizarre claim (which he stubbornly maintains despite abundant proof to the contrary) he says that my writing is "bait" approved by Israeli intelligence. Although he employs a different method, Hufschmid's slander against me has achieved the same result. He has successfully sown suspicion about my credibility and drawn attention to me as a person while completely marginalizing my 9-11 research, which he has ignored since 2007.
Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) wrote a book about Israel’s role in the 9-11 attacks (that I have not read), which must contain a great deal of my research. Thorn’s book was published by American Free Press, where I worked from 2000 until October 2006.  Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn) Although I was the first journalist to write about the Israeli role in the 9-11 attacks and have done far more research (for eight years) than any other writer on the subject, AFP was never interested in doing a book about 9-11 with me. This is an intelligence tactic called “stealing the thunder.” If AFP were truly interested in exposing the Israeli role in 9-11, why have they not asked to publish my ground-breaking book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World? So, what have I done to deserve being subjected to the vicious and concerted campaign of calumny, slander, and libel? What is it that I have done that bothers them so much that they spend time attacking me? This is easy. Apart from raising my family, for the past eight years my only vocation has been to research and write about the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. As an investigative journalist I have led the way in investigating the role of Israeli intelligence and Zionist agents in the United States in the terror attacks of 9-11. If my 9-11 research and writing is the reason these detractors are attacking me with slander and libel, who are they doing it for? It stands to reason that these four are working as agents of an agency that is interested in my research being discredited and marginalized. Because my thesis is that the state of Israel and Zionists in the U.S. are behind 9-11, these must be the same entities behind the anti-Bollyn slander campaign. This makes sense because well-known Zionist entities such as Rupert Murdoch’s FOX News, CNN, and the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz have all tried to smear me as an anti-Semite. Are these four detractors connected with a Zionist agency or the state of Israel? Eric Hufschmid’s father, with whom he works closely, is the father of the wife of Rupert Murdoch’s son James, heir apparent of the Murdoch media empire. Smith is a former narcotics user who has several felony convictions that were suddenly cleared up immediately before he began his career with “The French Connection” in early 2005. Piper and Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) work for a newspaper called American Free Press, where I worked as an independent contractor (since the fall of 2001) after being hired in the spring of 2000. AFP claims to be an employee-owned newspaper, which is a deception meant to fool readers. AFP has no assets to own. Everything of value associated with the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press is held by a host of shell companies with names like “The Committee to Expose Bunk”, which issued my paychecks, for example. Michael Piper is one of the people allowed to sign checks from these entities. The person who is the mastermind of the shell game involving the assets of the Liberty Lobby is Mark Lane, the Jewish lawyer who played a crucial role in the massacre at Jonestown, Guyana.  Mark Lane (center) was present at Jonestown during the massacre. He is considered to have played a key role in provoking the massacre by playing on the fears of Jim Jones. This photo with Jones (left) was taken shortly before the mass suicide/massacre. How odd that Lane became the lawyer, and then owner of the Liberty Lobby several years later. Lane has been the lawyer of the Liberty Lobby since the mid-1980s and received some $5 million in legal fees, according to a veteran Liberty Lobby insider. Lane, who served in U.S. Army Intelligence in Germany at the end of the war, acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1993 or 1994, according to L.T. Patterson (owner of Criminal Politics), who discovered this fact during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson. Who does Lane work for? Lane must work for the C.I.A. Having worked for Army Intelligence in the mid-1940s, it stands to reason that Lane became one of the head honchos in the Jewish intelligence cabal in Army Intelligence that became the C.I.A. in 1949. This would explain Lane’s role in his writings on the Warren Report, the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, Jonestown, and the so-called patriot movement at the Liberty Lobby. But isn’t the C.I.A. working to protect the nation and the people of the United States? Obviously not. The C.I.A. was criticized for being asleep at the switch on 9-11, but it is really much worse than that. The C.I.A. actually works against the interests of the republic and the American people. The C.I.A. is obviously deeply involved in the commission of the terrorism crime of 9-11. Rather than preventing 9-11 or finding the culprits of the atrocity, the C.I.A. has been exploiting the 9-11 deception to wage war using drone warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Asked about the C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded as if she had no legal authority or control over the C.I.A., which was a remarkably candid response from a U.S. Secretary of State. Her response indicated that the C.I.A. is a rogue agency that acts outside the control of the U.S. administration. How can that be? What is the C.I.A.’s interest in Afghanistan and Pakistan? The C.I.A. is clearly not interested in solving 9-11 or finding the culprits. We know that the Twin Towers were demolished using an advanced form of super-thermite (produced using nano-technology) and that the official version that Osama Bin Laden carried out 9-11 from a cave in Afghanistan is nothing but a pack of lies. The C.I.A. is involved in Afghanistan because that’s where most of the world’s opium is produced. George H.W. Bush, the former director of the C.I.A., was also a director of the Eli Lilly Company, the pharmaceutical giant that manufactures Prozac. Bush was also one of the first students at Israel’s Yonatan [Netanyahu] Institute of terrorism in 1979. Since the production of opium has skyrocketed since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, we can assume that opium production is one of the purposes of the war and occupation. Prior to the invasion of 2001, the Taliban regime, which the U.S. is fighting against, had succeeded in eradicating nearly all opium production in Afghanistan. This explains why American Free Press was so strongly opposed to my articles about the dangerous effects of Prozac and similar drugs. When Ellen Mariani, a 9-11 widow, told me that the grieving relatives had been sent to Red Cross doctors who had prescribed Prozac – the editor at AFP cut it out of the story. My subsequent articles about serotonin-affecting drugs and school shootings were rejected out-of-hand. This was clearly a subject that the American Free Press did not want to take up. One has to remember what Andreas von Bülow said about intelligence agencies in December 2001: ”Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation.” The first target of the deception and disinformation of the C.I.A. is the people of the United States. This is a rogue agency that must be disbanded if the American republic is to survive. The C.I.A. is no sacred cow, some sacrosanct institution that can be allowed to carry out its own agenda, wage war, and maintain secret prisons, all in the name of our democratic American republic. The C.I.A. is a rogue agency that is obviously an enemy of American democracy. The United States of America cannot survive as a democratic republic with the C.I.A. operating as the shadow government. The C.I.A. is nothing but a band of organized criminals operating under the guise of the United States. By dissolving the C.I.A. we would obtain answers to many of the crimes committed in the past 60 years. Question: I am making an appeal that you repost the following important articles on your website or link to them somewhere. They are increasingly getting harder to find on the Internet. Many sites just link back to your site and yet they are no longer available at Bollyn.com Some people are just beginning to wake up – they really need to hear what happened and understand the nature and character of Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. I hope to see this information on your site again soon. “Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can” – Daryl B. Smith (Understanding the Methods of Defamation) Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid James B. Phillips Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid & Daryl B. SmithBollyn Responds to Malicious Slander of Daryl B. Smith Bollyn Responds: I have recently received quite a few questions about my detractors, namely Michael Piper, Daryl B. Smith, and Eric Hufschmid. I have reposted these articles under the section entitled The Cure for Disinfo. As the former German intelligence chief Andreas von Buelow told me in December 2001, “Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation.” Marion Fulk, the retired scientist of the Manhattan Project and Livermore Lab, used to tell me that the government “has buildings full of agents” to do their dirty work. When we would go to a restaurant in Livermore after a day spent studying the effects of depleted uranium, there would be several agents tailing us and listening to our conversation. My detractors and those who slander and libel me are working for such people. The truth is coming out and we can all see who has been working for the truth and who has not. The functions of Michael Piper and sticky fly-paper operations like American Free Press are a bit more complicated and something I will take up in the next question.  Marion Fulk (left) and Christopher Bollyn at Fulk’s home in Livermore, California Question of April 14: In human history, are you aware of examples in which the entire population of a country believed in a lie for years, then discovered the lie? Does recognition of truth happen rapidly? What is the usual outcome? What do you predict Mr. Bollyn?  The Katyn Massacre Memorial Bollyn Responds: Big lies are really not that unusual, especially when massacres are involved. History is littered with them. The Katyn Massacre comes to mind. The recent crash of the plane of the Polish president and 96 others has brought this extremely painful “Big Lie” back into the spotlight. The Katyn Massacre was the mass murder of some 22,000 Polish nationals by the Soviet secret police, a massacre which had been approved by the entire Soviet Politburo, including Joseph Stalin, Britain’s ally in its “unnecessary war” against Germany. Nazi Germany announced the discovery of mass graves in the Katyn Forest in 1943 and was immediately blamed - without a single stitch of evidence - by the Allies and Western media for the atrocity. Hitler actually called for an investigation into the killings, although it was not until 1990 that the Soviet Union officially acknowledged and condemned the perpetration of the killings by the Soviet NKVD, and the subsequent cover-up.  The Ground Zero Cross The massacre and terror atrocity of 9-11 are very similar to the Katyn Massacre. The blame was wrongly placed on Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida – without any evidence - in order to usher in the pre-planned “War on Terror” with an illegal invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and subsequently Iraq. The crucial evidence of the crime of 9-11 was quickly destroyed and a politically controlled non-investigation managed under the direction of Michael Chertoff, a dedicated agent of the actual culprits – Israeli intelligence and their Zionist quislings in the United States.  Michael Chertoff was the key person responsible for the destruction of the evidence of 9-11 – and the cover-up. Chertoff, the son of an Israeli Mossad agent named Livia Eisen, is an Israeli by birth. The Zionist-controlled media ignored the evidence of Israeli involvement and pushed the official version, which is really nothing more than a pack of lies. Nothing good will ever come from such evil deceit, and nothing good has come from the lies surrounding 9-11. For more than 8 years the world has been deceived about what really happened on 11 September 2001 and why we are engaged in the War on Terror - but the truth is coming out. The dam of lies and deceit is breaking and it is no longer possible to hold back the Truth. The culprits and those who have assisted the cover-up are becoming very uncomfortable. The liars and rats of the 9-11 deception will be washed away by the flood waters of Truth.  The Dedication of the Cross Comment of April 9: Dear Mr Bollyn. I am one of your fans. I thought you would like this article, in case you did not read it yet. I wonder if Mr. Wilkerson [Col. Lawrence B.] might be one of many “whistle blowers” who come to light in coming weeks and months? George W. Bush ‘knew Guantánamo prisoners were innocent’ The Times (U.K.) April 9, 2010 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7092435.ece George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld covered up that hundreds of innocent men were sent to the Guantánamo Bay prison camp because they feared that releasing them would harm the push for war in Iraq and the broader War on Terror, according to a new document obtained by The Times.
The accusations were made by Lawrence Wilkerson, a top aide to Colin Powell, the former Republican Secretary of State, in a signed declaration to support a lawsuit filed by a Guantánamo detainee. It is the first time that such allegations have been made by a senior member of the Bush Administration. Colonel Wilkerson, who was General Powell’s chief of staff when he ran the State Department, was most critical of Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld. He claimed that the former Vice-President and Defence Secretary knew that the majority of the initial 742 detainees sent to Guantánamo in 2002 were innocent but believed that it was “politically impossible to release them”.  Who said never again? Guantanamo is a real concentration camp in our time. Children as young as 12 and 13 and elderly as old as 92 or 93 were taken to Gitmo. Why are the people behind this outrageous crime being protected from prosecution? When will President Obama close the Gitmo Gulag and begin an investigation of the abuses committed there? Why delay what has to be done? Answer: Yes, there will certainly be others coming forward who will expose the lies and deception of 9-11 and the Zionist fraud known as the “War on Terror.” The real question is when and what kind of legal action will follow to investigate and punish those who are really behind 9-11 and the subsequent ”War on Terror” that has destroyed so many lives? I recommend Andy Worthington’s article of April 14. “Wilkerson Demolishes Bush, Cheney, And Rumsfeld’s Lies About Guantanamo” in The Public Record: For Col. Wilkerson, who remains “extremely concerned that the Armed Forces of the United States, where I spent 31 years of my professional life, were deeply involved in these tragic mistakes,” the need for accountability has a particularly personal meaning, but for the rest of us, it should be no less important that torture was used to justify an illegal war, that it infected the U.S. military, that those who authorized it remain free to continue spreading their poisonous lies (in Dick Cheney’s case, at least), and that men continue to languish in Guantánamo as a result of it — and also as a result of the Obama administration’s unwillingness, or refusal to confront the very facts that Col. Wilkerson has disclosed. Worthington’s article is at: http://pubrecord.org/commentary/7416/wilkerson-demolishes-bush-cheney/ Wilkerson’s signed statement (pdf) of March 24, 2010 is here. Question of April 6: Dear Mr. Bollyn: I have been reading many articles on the 9-11 atrocity and other major world events. I am a 46-year-old Ashkenazi Jew from London, England. I believe the Rothschilds and the banking conspiracy are behind EVERYTHING. When I bring the subject up with my peers and family, I am told it is anti-Semitic nonsense, probably paid for by the Saudi Arabians. If there is no actual proof, and the Rothschilds are so powerful, please help me to understand why so much data is available on the Internet. Am I missing something? Surely the Rothschilds would be able to prevent this data surfacing under libel or slander laws, or anti-defamation. Thank you. I look forward to your reply. Answer: Yes, the Rothschilds are behind much of what goes on – especially when it concerns the outlaw state of Israel. The Rothschild family was the prime mover and financier of the Zionist project to settle Russian and Polish Jews in Palestine. The 1917 Balfour Declaration which promised British support for a home for world Jewry in Palestine was addressed to Lord Rothschild (Lionel Walter, 2nd Baron Rothschild 1868-1937), head of the English branch of the Jewish banking family – and unofficial head of British Jewry. The Balfour Declaration gave great impetus to the Zionist movement that eventually resulted in the state of Israel. The Rothschild bankers were obviously calling the shots in Britain in 1917. Lionel’s father, the 1st Baron Rothschild, was able in 1875 to give £4,000,000 to Britain’s first Jewish prime minister, D’Israeli (later Disraeli), to become the principal stockholder in the Suez Canal Company. Prior to World War I Zionism represented only a minority of Jews, mostly from Russia, but led by Austrian and German Jews. By 1914 there were about 90,000 Jews in Palestine; 13,000 settlers lived in 43 Jewish agricultural settlements, many of them supported by the French Jew Baron Edmond de Rothschild. The Rothschilds are able to control governments by being primary lenders of money to national banks, like the Federal Reserve. In the past 40 years the United States has gone from being the largest creditor nation to becoming the largest debtor nation. This is how the U.S. has lost its independence and much of its felicity. The greater the debt, the greater the control gained by the international bankers like the Rothschilds. (to be continued…) Question of April 2: I just listened to Dr. Sabrosky’s broadcast. He was pretty convincing although I felt he was a little short on details. He seemed to place a great deal of his case on the fall of WTC 7, but never once did he say anything about Larry Silverstein and only one very brief mention of nano-thermite. 9-11 was such a complicated operation and required the cooperation of many people. I’m sure you have told us before, but why was it necessary to bring down WTC 7? The fall of WTC 7 is so obviously controlled demolition, why would those responsible take the risk of exposing their crime by demolishing 7 in this way? There had to have been something in that building that was so important to make it worth their great risk to demolish it. Or did they simply feel so confident that they could do this in plain sight and have complete confidence in their control of our government and media? Answer: The demolition of WTC 7 is the event that revealed to Dr. Alan Sabrosky and Dr. Steven Jones (and many others) that the official version of 9-11 is a pack of lies. Destroying WTC 7 was obviously crucial to the whole false-flag terror operation. There are two main explanations for this. First, it may have housed equipment and personnel that played a role in the destruction of the WTC towers, for example in the specially fortified bunker on the 22nd or 23rd floor. Secondly, it housed the offices of federal agencies involved in investigations of serious financial crimes. The destruction of the evidence would have been crucial in both cases. The vault beneath WTC 6 held much of the evidence for the federal agencies in WTC 7 and this vault was evidently cleaned out the night before 9-11, according to Kurt Sonnenfeld, the FEMA photographer who looked into it. The Zionist perpetrators have complete confidence that they could get away with this because of their control of our government and media, as you say, but the real key was having control of the buildings prior to 9-11 and having Michael Chertoff in the key position to control the destruction of the evidence and non-investigation of the crime. WTC 7 was owned by Larry Silverstein and had been built with Israeli contractors in the mid-1980s, when the Zionist plan for the destruction of the WTC had already been developed. The main strategic reason for the Israeli false-flag terror of 9-11 was to usher in the “War on Terror” and bring the U.S. military into the Middle East on a permanent basis – to protect Israel’s hegemony in the region. See: “America the Target: 9-11 and Israel’s History of False Flag Terrorism” http://www.bollyn.com/america-the-target-9-11-and-the-history-of-false-flag-terrorism Question of March 26: In a recent radio interview, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (a former director of the US Military War College, General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research, among other highly impressive credentials) stated that top American military brass know Israel did 9/11. A four part series of this interview is on Youtube. Dr. Sabrosky stated that in recent weeks he has brought this to the attention of many high level military contacts, who now realize Israel’s role in 9/11. Do you believe it’s true that top military officers are just now beginning to realize what you’ve been saying, and if so, what might be the outcome? Dr. Alan Sabrosky discusses increasing awareness in the U.S. military that Israel is behind 9-11 and disastrous war policies in Iraq and Afghanistan. IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation – period. - Dr. Alan Sabrosky If these Americans and those like them ever fully understand just how much of their suffering – and the suffering we have inflicted on others – is properly laid on the doorsteps of Israel and its advocates in America, they will sweep aside those in politics, the press and the pulpits alike whose lies and disloyalty brought this about and concealed it from them. They may well leave Israel looking like Carthage after the Romans finished with it. It will be Israel’s own great fault. - Alan Sabrosky, “Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond”, Sept. 10, 2009 Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year U.S. Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College. Answer: In the video clip, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (who says that he has Jewish ancestors) claims he has informed people at the highest levels of the U.S. military that Israeli Mossad criminals are behind 9-11. He says that most of the people in the U.S. military brass were not aware of Israel’s role in 9-11 and are truly shocked and enraged when they realize that the U.S. has been duped and deceived by Israeli intelligence. I don’t doubt that for a minute. I believe that the 9-11 deception was not understood by the people at the top. This is why the title of my book is Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World. Had the deception of the false-flag terror atrocity been widely understood in the military, I certainly would not have been attacked, maliciously prosecuted, and tried in a corrupt Chicago court in 2007 with virtually no support from the U.S. military and other institutions. Articles about the conspiracy behind the brutal police attack and my trial can be found in The Bollyn Trial section. There has, however, been a very significant and noticeable sea change in how the U.S. and British governments and media treat Israel during the past few weeks and I think that Dr. Sabrosky’s revelations may be connected with that change. I am very encouraged by this development, to say the least. Question of March 17: Just today, Wayne Madsen has disclosed another very important link in the chain of evidence: he reports that an El Al 747 departed from JFK for Tel Aviv at 4:11 p.m. on 9/11/2001 and it was full. Would you please pause for a moment to contemplate the evidentiary significance of confirming the complete list of passengers who embarked for Tel Aviv on that unauthorized flight? Answer: I would expect that Ehud Olmert and many of the Israelis who were behind the terrorism of 9-11 were on this plane. As I pointed out in December 2007, Ehud Olmert, the Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem and deputy prime minister of Israel, was in New York City on the eve of 9-11. The fact that this high level Israeli politician was in New York City on September 10, 2001 has been kept secret. I would assume that this visit has been kept secret because it involved the false-flag terror attacks of the following day. I suspect that Olmert was in New York City during the attacks. It would, of course, be very interesting to get the passenger list. I will see what I can do. Question and Comment: With the information that is now available, why has the insurance company that paid off on Lucky Larry’s [Silverstein] fraudulent World Trade Center terrorism claim not made some kind of effort to get their money back? Hope you can provide some insight on this. I would also like to comment on my view of the state of the world. Obviously things were not “hunky dory” prior to 9-11, but since that fateful day, the criminal network has been given a blank check to do anything. The American populace seems asleep, thinking only of shopping, sports, money – just making it through their own lives. Answer: This is a very good question. Much of the money that has been paid out in 9-11 claims has actually come from U.S. taxpayer funds. I had read that the insurance companies were actually reimbursed in this way, but have not seen the documentation. The recently litigated payout to the first responders came from a $1 billion FEMA fund, for example. I will try to check if the WTC insurers were also compensated with U.S. taxpayer money. One thing that needs to be understood about the ownership of the WTC towers is that agents of the state of Israel became the de facto owners of the WTC when Silverstein took control of the towers in late July 2001. “Sources in the Port Authority intimated that even though they were still in the vicinity, Silverstein was in control,” Haaretz reported in its 2001 article, “Up in smoke”. Through the Silverstein takeover, which was supervised by Lewis Eisenberg of the Port Authority, agents of Israeli intelligence gained access and complete control of the WTC property that was the target of their carefully planned terrorist attack.  Lewis Eisenberg at the scene of the crime – Eisenberg, a partner at Goldman Sachs, was the head of the Port Authority (the owner of the World Trade Center) in 2001 and was the key person who facilitated the property falling into the hands of Larry Silverstein. The Silverstein takeover was essential to the Israeli’s evil plan because in order to carry out such a sophisticated false-flag terror operation with complete security, owning the property was a requirement. Here are the three principal agents of the takeover:  Larry Silverstein Larry Silverstein, former owner of Runway 69, a Queens strip club, is a close friend and business partner of Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak. Silverstein has been close to Netanyahu since he served as Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations. “For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein,” Haaretz reported. “It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance. A recent article on Voltairenet.org claims that Silverstein was treasurer of Netanyahu’s terrorism school, the mysterious Jonathan Institute and of his electoral campaigns. I have not seen that before and will look to see if it is true. A good article on Silverstein’s friendship and business connections to Netanyahu and Barak is “Up in Smoke” from the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz. (American Friends of the Jonathan Institute was established in Washington, D.C. in March 1977 and in New York City in care of Feder & Gopin in June 1977, two years before its first conference.) Silverstein was accused, along with Bill Clinton and Colin Powell, of being involved in drug smuggling and other crimes in a 1997 lawsuit Harry P. Miller v. Larry Silverstein, et al.  Lloyd M. Goldman Lloyd Goldman is Silverstein’s behind-the-scenes equity partner on the World Trade Center lease, was chairman of the finance committee of the American Associates of Ben Gurion University in 2000 and is currently national vice president. Ben Gurion University is affiliated with Israel’s Nuclear Research Center – Negev (NRCN), which is involved in developing nano-composite energetic materials like the super-Thermite which was found in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers. The crucial question about 9-11 that needs to be answered is who made the super-Thermite that demolished the concrete of the World Trade Center, and who applied it to the interior surfaces, probably the undersides of the 220 floor pans? The evidence indicates that 9-11 was an Israeli-engineered act of false-flag terrorism, which would mean that Israel probably produced the nano-composite of Thermite. The Nuclear Research Center Negev, which is where Israel produces its nuclear weapons, has long been involved in development of super-Thermite. Lloyd Goldman’s close connection to Ben Gurion University means that getting super-Thermite from the NRCN into the Twin Towers would practically be an in-house operation. Goldman is poised to take over the World Trade Center project when Silverstein, who is nearly 80, retires. See – “Meet the Other Trade Center Builder”, Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008  Frank Lowy Frank Lowy is the third key partner in the World Trade Center takeover. Born in 1930 into a family of modest means in Slovakia (then Czecho-Slovakia), Lowy spent the war years in Budapest, then moved to Palestine where he fought in the underground for the Zionist army, the Haganah. By 17, he was in an elite commando unit of the Israeli Army, fighting behind enemy lines in the War of Independence. In 2006 he established Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, which incorporates the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies. Comment of March 8: Chris, just wanted you to see this article….dang, I don’t understand people lying about you this way, just wanted you to see it, thank you, and keep up the good work, N. http://www.takeourworldback.com/bollynfalseflag.htm Bollyn Responds: I have not read the whole article but can clearly see by the style and content that it is written by Michael Bernard Piper (a.k.a. Michael Collins Piper) of American Free Press. This is obviously more of his nonsensical lies and slander. One needs to understand that Piper is paid to attack me on behalf of the Zionist Jew Mark Lane and the controlled opposition/flypaper outfit Lane runs out of the Liberty Lobby. If there was a fire in the HVAC unit on the roof of the building of the former I.B.M. Global Network Services (sold to AT&T a year before I left the company in May 2000), how should I know about it and what does it have to do with me? I was living in Germany where I had been since November 2001. How should I know about a minor fire in Schaumburg, Illinois? The main point of the article is to attack my credibility by calling me a liar, a Judas Goat, and an “intelligence operative”. The detailed information about Piper and his show indicates that the source of the article is Piper, and he is lying throughout. He is the Judas Goat who is projecting his sins on me in an effort to sow suspicion about my work and motives. When Piper says that he “allowed” me to stand in and host his show during the summer of 2006 he is using the wrong word. I was asked to do this and tried to avoid it because it was an extra obligation that I would have difficulty doing as I was on the road in the western United States. The real question is why does Piper, who lavished fulsome praise on me everytime he had me on his show in 2006 about being “America’s best journalist, bar none”, spend so much time and effort attacking me? Piper has obviously been tasked to do everything he can to sow suspicion about me and try to discredit my research and writing. He reveals how he tries to damage my credibility in these lines: If Bollyn really were an honest truth teller and genuine investigative journalist, he would not be lying like this. And if a supposedly honest journalist is known to be lying about some matters of fact, how can his word be trusted on anything? Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. It is interesting that Piper and Eric Hufschmid are doing the exact same thing, albeit in different ways. Hufschmid claims that I have been kidnapped and that my articles are being written by the Mossad, while Piper calls me a liar and intelligence operative. Both of them want to sow suspicion, which once planted in a reader’s mind, is very difficult to remove. But, what have I done to deserve this treatment? Answer: I have investigated and revealed too much about what really happened on 9-11. This is the same reason I was treated by the undercover police in Hoffman Estates as I was, and prosecuted as I was. It is interesting to note that Piper takes the word of the corrupt police of Chicagoland as gospel truth. My statement that the water had been turned off in the cell and that I was told “drink from the toilet” is supposedly disproven by the fact that there is a photo of a Hoffman Estates jail cell with a sink and toilet.  Michael Piper It should be noted that Piper sent me a very nasty email in December 2001 as we prepared to go to Moscow for a 9-11 conference. I thought at the time that it couldn’t possibly be from Piper and that someone must have hacked into his mailbox, but I now realize that this is exactly how he operates. He acts like he has a license to lie. He has never been a friend of mine. Question of March 5: Is Barbara Olson back from the dead? An anonymous person sent me a photo of Barbara Olson (said to have died on 9-11) side-by-side with an image of Lady Booth, the wife of Theodore Olson, former U.S. Solicitor General. There is no doubt that these two women look nearly identical. The question is whether the Barbara Olson (born Barbara Kay Bracher in Houston on December 27, 1955) is the same person as Lady Evelyn Booth (born in Louisville, Kentucky, on October 26, 1960) – or do they simply look very similar? While it is certainly possible with plastic surgery and the theft of an identity that this could happen, it is also possible that Ted simply chose a new wife that looked very much like his previous wife.  The similarity between the two wives of Ted Olson is remarkable. Is Lady Booth really Barb Olson after plastic surgery? The face on the right seems to have had cosmetic surgery.   Barbara Olson’s ear, seen here, can be compared with those of Lady Booth. Are they similar?  Lady Booth Olson This is an interesting question, which I will look into. What is very interesting about Barbara Bracher is that she earned her Juris Doctor at Yeshiva University in New York City. Yeshiva University is a private Jewish school which is very Jewish. Why would a young Catholic girl, who had worked for H.B.O. and Stacy Keach in Hollywood, choose to study law at Yeshiva University? It is possible that Barb Olson has Jewish roots and that this is why she chose Yeshiva University. Another odd thing about Barbara Bracher is that she lived in McLean, Virginia in the early 1990s which makes one wonder if she was working for the C.I.A. While Barbara Olson had very close connections to orthodox Jews and Zionism, her husband actually worked to protect the crimes of the state of Israel when he defended the Israeli spy, Jonathan Jay Pollard. How did he get that case - and why did he take it? Ted and Barbara Olson’s ties to Israeli intelligence need to be taken into consideration when pondering their roles in the false flag terror of 9-11. As a partner of the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Theodore Olson served as lead counsel for George W. Bush in Bush v. Gore before the U.S. Supreme Courth, which secured Bush’s election as President of the United States. Bush then appointed Olson as United States Solicitor General which he was from, 2001-2004. At Yeshiva University, Ted Olson recalled that Barbara Bracher had been the person who officially kicked the Palestinian office out of the United States: In her third year of law school [Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University], Barbara somehow managed to finesse herself into an internship in the Department of Justice in Washington. And, as a very brassy and gutsy intern, she managed to be the only employee of the government of the United States willing, feisty, and fearless enough to personally serve the papers on the PLO mission to the United Nations in New York announcing that it was being expelled from this country—because they were terrorists. How proud Barbara was to tell that story to her friends at Cardozo! Question of March 2: Have you heard that it is very possible that Dr. Steven Jones and his nano-thermite theory could very well be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement down a false path? Dr. Judy Wood theorizes that a Directed Energy Weapon was used to turn the steel into dust. Her theory is very compelling, and this could very well explain why Steven Jones has gotten so far with his nano-thermite theory. Answer: Yes, I have heard about that theory. I was probably the first person to have written about this “theory” of a directed energy beam being involved in 9-11 after having an interview with a “former” spy from East Germany, who admitted to having worked with the Mossad. See: http://www.bollyn.com/mossad-in-germany-and-9-11-disinfo The evidence, however, of nano-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center is solid proof that this advanced nano-composite explosive was used to pulverize the towers. This is not to say that other explosives were not used, such as cutter charges on the central columns or huge bombs in the basements of the towers. As Dr. Jones would say, the data doesn’t lie. The theory of an energy weapon being used to demolish the towers is not supported by the evidence. I consider it to be a kind of red herring theory meant to distract people from the evidence of explosives and super thermite. Question of February 26: It’s been at least a week with no postings on your website? Are you OK? Inquiring minds want to know… Bollyn Responds: Yes, I am fine. I have been busy doing the final editing of the first 14 chapters of my book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World. I did this and printed out the chapters for a supporter in Canada who requested a copy of the book. This took some time away from the article that I am working on, which is about Kenneth Feinberg, the Special Master of the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund. It will come as no surprise that Kenneth Feinberg is a high-level agent of the Israeli government and the Mossad. This article involved quite a bit of research but I hope to have it published in the coming days.  9-11 Special Master Kenneth Feinberg and his wife Diane “Dede” Shaff Feinberg are high-level agents of the state of Israel. Feinberg and his law firm was given an open account from the U.S. Treasury and doled out billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars – without any oversight or accountability - to the families of 9-11 victims to keep them from seeking justice and discovery through the courts. Some 98 percent of the 9-11 families took the money from the fund. Who got how much and who all got paid in the process is a closely guarded secret. Why? The 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund is U.S. taxpayer money after all. We have every right to see how it was disbursed.  Alvin K. Hellerstein: Orthodox Jew and devoted Zionist The same law that created the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund also stipulated that all 9-11 related lawsuits would go through the U.S. District Court of Manhattan, where Alvin K. Hellerstein, an orthodox Jew and devoted supporter of Israel has prevented any case from going to trial. Nearly every single lawsuit concerning a victim of 9-11 has been settled out of court. Thanks to the efforts of the dedicated Zionist team headed by Kenneth Feinberg and Alvin Hellerstein it is very unlikely that there will ever be a 9-11 trial for the worst terror crime in U.S. history. What kind of justice is that? Who are they protecting? Comment: I am reading your book, Solving 9/11. Your quote attributed to Menachem Begin “We are the master race” supposedly delivered at a meeting of the Knesset seems far fetched. Did you check the source of that quote? I did a little checking and read that it was invented by Texe Marrs. Do you have any sources for the quote? Thanks, your work is fascinating. Bollyn Responds: The addition of the Begin quote was a recent change. Since the quote cannot be sourced, I have removed it. The text now uses the Begin quote from Kapeliouk’s article: “[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs.” – Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the ‘Beasts,”‘ New Statesman, June 25, 1982. Comment from a Gulf War Vet: Hello, I am not sure if this goes to Mr. Bollyn or not but I am giving it a shot. I was reading your August 15, 2004 article on depleted uranium and Gulf War Vets. I was a combat engineer during the Gulf War and I wanted to support your article. I am 39 years old and have spent my days since the war in college and now I teach school. I am a non-smoker and live a simple life. In December I was diagnosed with kidney cancer and it spread a bit to the lymphnods. The surgery was hell and now I face a life with cancer. Well thanks for your time and thanks so much for your article on this subject. I am filing a claim with the VA. Bollyn’s Response: This vet is suffering from the effects of D.U. exposure, as are many others. This is an extremely dangerous weapon that should be banned. My four-part series on depleted uranium can be read here: http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2004/08/15_bollyn_depleted-uranium-blamed-cancer.htm Marion Fulk and Christopher Bollyn My research on “depleted” uranium weapons was aided immensely by Marion Fulk of Livermore, California (left). Marion spent most of his working life as a scientist in the employ of the U.S. government, from the Manhattan Project to Livermore Lab. Now retired, Fulk said he wanted to help inform the public of the long-term damage to human health caused by the use of uranium-tipped weapons. Question: Do you post or send articles to Rense and Jones? Did look, can’t find much recent. Answer: Websites that post my material or links to my articles do so of their own choosing. Two very good sites that re-post my material are RebelNews.org and TruthSeeker.co.uk. Here is the link to some of my material on RebelNews.org and here is the link to my material on TruthSeeker.co.UK: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/columnist.asp?ID=6 Question: Can’t even say in words how much I appreciate such extremely rare honest reporting in these dangerous times! Suggestion: Times are tough–can you add a $5 button to the array of PayPal buttons for donations, since even $10 might be too out of reach for some? Answer: Yes, I will do that. Comment: Re the black box on Flight 77 shows “cabin doors not open” means nothing since there was no evidence that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. There was no released video of Pentagon crash. No recognizable Boeing 757 parts, the penetration of the walls was too deep and too narrow for a 757, no wing or engine marks on building, etc. So, why do you think this story is special? Just curious? Bollyn’s Response: You are quite right. There is no evidence that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon nor do I think that one did crash into the building. We don’t know where this black box of Flight 77 really came from but the story is about an independent investigation of the data on the box that is said to be from Flight 77. It is just another small piece of the puzzle showing the massive deception of 9-11. Question: My friend sent me this link about an upcoming 9-11 conference in Manhattan. I wish you were on it. Lenny Charles is putting it together. http://www.howtheworldchanged.org/index.html Bollyn Responds: I was not invited to the 9-11 event being put on by Lenny Charles, owner of INN World News. Judging from the invited speakers and panel subjects, I seriously doubt if his 9-11 event at the Walker Stage will discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement, which is the basis of my thesis about the false flag terror that precipitated the Zionist “War on Terror” and the invasion of Afghanistan. Having spoken with Mr. Charles on September 3, I am even more inclined to believe that the question of “Who did it?” will not be delved into. The Orthodox Jewish and Israeli gangsters (e.g. Joseph “Yossi” Shereshevsky, Amnon Cohen, and Avi Benamu) behind the WexTrust Securities scam are the Jewish criminals who financed the current (secret) owners of INN’s 56 Walker St. building. Why are the Israeli partners in the WexTrust fraud being protected by the court and media? Although the Israelis involved in the WexTrust scam are kept concealed and protected, this is clearly the real reason why Lenny Charles is reluctant to discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. The Israeli connection is specifically meant NOT to be on the agenda. That’s what controlled media means. Even the alternative media is controlled. Who controls Lenny? (The answer to this crucial question is shocking and will be subject of my next article.)  Lenny Charles (right) of INN World Report  Lenny Charles of INN is the front man for the mystery owner of 56 Walker Street. Who might that be and why is his identity kept secret? I don’t know much about Lenny Charles. He said in a 2009 video interview that he is from New Jersey and that he was educated at the El Paso campus of the University of Texas, which is an unusual place for a kid from New Jersey. Lenny says he was a jazz musician for 25 years before starting INN World News, which is based in a high-rent building in Manhattan’s Tribeca neighborhood. How does Lenny manage it? Charles is also listed as representing a company called SKG Media How does Lenny Charles and his 56 Walker Street job fit in with all of this gang, which is clearly involved in criminal fraud? and as the contact person for Walker Stage, located at 56 Walker Street in Manhattan. SKG is often used to refer to the media moguls Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen, but are they the money behind Lenny Charles and INN? Walker Stage is a nightclub owned by 56 Walker LLC, whoever that might be. A search for the owner turns up a host of legal cases that involve 56 Walker LLC and people named Avroham and Joseph Shereshevsky and a sprawling octopus company called Wextrust, which has many holding companies such as WexTrust Capital LLC, doing business in Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan in Israel and operating mining operations in Africa. For the details of INN’s connections to Zionist money, read: “The Zionist Gang Behind New York’s 9/11 Conference” by Christopher Bollyn http://www.bollyn.com/the-zionist-gang-behind-new-yorks-9-11-conference  Joseph Shereshevsky (left, son of the rabbi Chaim Shereshevsky of Brooklyn) a Norfolk resident and former COO of WexTrust Capital and Steven Byers, the company’s founder and CEO, were each hit with fraud and conspiracy charges. When he was arrested for his part in the $100 million pyramid scheme in August 2008, Shereshevsky held a one-way plane ticket to Israel. After they were busted, Byers made a $500 donation to Barack Obama on August 23, 2008. (Courtesy of www.vosizneias.com) In August 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged WexTrust Capital and its affiliates with fraud, alleging that the company ran a Ponzi scheme that raised at least $255 million by targeting members of the Orthodox Jewish community. The S.E.C. said WexTrust’s principals, Steven Byers and Joseph Shereshevsky, deceived at least 1,196 investors since 2002. The defendants diverted at least $100 million to unauthorized purposes, according to the S.E.C.’s complaint. The SEC charge against WexTrust, a Chicago-based company, can be read here. An interactive time line of the case is here. Question: I found it interesting that your ancestors are related to Anne Boleyn. Aren’t you spelling your name wrong?  THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL – Queen Elizabeth I, the most famous queen in English history, is known for fostering the English Enlightenment and defeating the Spanish Armada. Elizabeth was the daughter of Anne Boleyn, the most persistently maligned of English queens. The Boleyn family has suffered a vicious and relentless campaign of defamation for nearly 500 years. Prior to the religious reforms initiated by the Boleyn family, the Vatican owned a third of all the land of England. Bollyn Responds: The Bollyn (Boleyn) name is originally from West Flanders. The ancestors of Queen Anne Boleyn came from the area around Calais in Boulonnais, which was then English territory across the channel from Dover. Anne’s great-grandfather, Geoffrey, was a wealthy mercer (importer of fine fabrics) who became the Lord Mayor of London in 1457. There were no strict rules for spelling in English at the time. Anne’s father spelled the name Bullen. In the historical literature about Anne Boleyn there are at least 30 different spellings of the name. Anne, who was well educated and multi-lingual having lived in Flanders and France as a child, seems to be the one who made the “Boleyn” spelling stick. “La petite Boulain” is how the Archduchess Margaret of Austria described the 12-year-old Anne, who served as a maid of honor in the court of Burgundy at Mechelen. The Boulain spelling captures the long “ay” sound in the second syllable, which is actually the correct pronunciation of the name, at least in Flemish or Dutch. Our family has spelled the name Bollyn since at least 1860 in St. Louis, which is as far back as I have documented. Some time before that the family of Henry Bollyn immigrated to the United States from Switzerland. Henry’s first daughter was named Anne, but she died in Kentucky at the tender age of 10 months. A year or two later he was blessed with another daughter, which he also named Anne. My father and grandfather were named Albert Bollyn, which happens to be the same name as a Belgian held in the Nazi concentration camp of Dachau from 1944-1945. I don’t know much about this Albert Bollyn but I suppose he was probably arrested for resisting tyranny. It runs in the family.  Question: Do you receive the American Free Press (AFP) newspaper? There are two copies in September 2010 that try to convey that they are right on top of the 9/11 issue, which makes me annoyed, as you are the one who has done all the serious research. Bollyn Responds: This question came from a person who has been reading my work for a long time. No, I don’t read AFP, which is a newspaper I wrote for from 2000 until October 2006. The newspaper is run by Willis Carto and his lawyer friend Mark Lane. According to information gleaned during a lawsuit in which Lane was suing L.T. Patterson of Criminal Politics, Mark Lane acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1994. This indicates that AFP is nothing but an asset of the C.I.A., which runs it as a controlled opposition mouthpiece. Mark Lane is an old Army intelligence agent from WWII in Germany. Lane played a key role in the Jonestown massacre, which he witnessed and is said to have instigated by using fear tactics on the paranoid Rev. Jim Jones. This is similar to what AFP does to its readers. Lane’s relationship with AFP explains the paper’s bizarre actions I observed as I got closer to the truth about 9/11. AFP is now publishing articles about 9/11 that suggest that there were no planes on 9/11 (see “Absence of Real Photo Evidence Leads to Video Fakery Speculation”, October 11, 2010). In an article from September 20, 2010, Makufka asks whether “mini-nukes” were used to bring down the WTC. These “disinfo” articles are written by Scott R. Makufka who writes under the name “Victor Thorn”. Makufka and his girlfriend Lisa Giuliani teamed up with Michael Piper after I was attacked by undercover police. They sought to impugn my credibility and claim my research as their own in a concerted Zionist effort to marginalize my work, and have me prosecuted and thrown in jail.  Scott Makufka and Lisa Giuliani were part of the anti-Bollyn disinfo hit squad, along with Michael Piper. Why would AFP turn on its own reporter after 6 years of good reporting? It is very clear from the evidence that Boeing airplanes hit the Twin Towers, the only question is exactly which planes they were. Photographs reveal that more durable parts, such as landing gear and engines from the aircraft, landed on the streets of Manhattan.  This engine from the aircraft that struck the South Tower landed on Murray Street. The parts of this engine are all marked with specific numbers that would identify precisely which aircraft they belonged to. Why haven’t they been shown to the public? Why the secrecy about exactly which jet engine this is?  Every time-tracked part of the aircraft is numbered, such as this piece.  This landing gear would also contain time-tracked parts with specific serial numbers which would precisely identify the aircraft that struck the tower.  All of these aircraft parts were collected by the F.B.I., which was under the command of Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General…  ...who authorized for the aircraft evidence to be taken to the dump at Fresh Kills…  ...where they were treated like garbage – not as crucial primary evidence from the scene of a mass murder. Why would Michael Chertoff, an Israeli national and the son of an Israeli Mossad agent, allow such critical criminal evidence to be treated like garbage? Why wasn’t this engine taken to a high-tech FBI crime scene lab (like we see on television) and its time-tracked parts compared with the maintenance records for the planes said to have been involved? There is only one logical answer to these questions: the aircraft parts were not examined and shown to the public because they are not from the planes that are said to have hit the Twin Towers. The FBI and U.S. military only solve such crimes on TV shows, not in real life. That’s part of the deception. Question: Thanks for your sincere response. I greatly respect and sympathize with you. I don’t know how Americans, and people of other countries around the world, have lost their ability to think critically. Even among my own family, they are focused on college football, pro golf, or some other distraction. The phony “right wing” commentators like Glenn Beck, et al, don’t help either… As for your case, and the “criminal” case brought against you, the most amazing thing is that other journalists do not come to your aid. The same can be said of firefighters re: 911, why don’t they organize and make demands for a new investigation!!?! Pilots too. Sometimes it really makes me re-think my own beliefs. Bollyn Responds: The way my case was handled by the media in the United States speaks volumes about the controlled press. I was, after all, known to be a working journalist when a three-man squad of undercover police broke my arm and tortured me with a TASER me at my home – in front of my daughter – in August 2006.  Shocked and saddened – Christopher Bollyn with his children in Schaumburg after the police assault. Bollyn’s 8-year-old daughter had seen three heavily-armed undercover police torture her father with a TASER as they held him down in handcuffs after an unprovoked assault that left him with a broken elbow. Bollyn was subsequently charged with attacking the unidentified armed men who had invaded his home and threatened his family. But, of course. The fact that I was a journalist (for more than six years) with a national newspaper based in Washington, D.C. was carefully omitted in all the media reports about the bizarre and brutal police incident. I was sometimes referred to as a “blogger” – but never as a journalist. This is because the controlled media has always sought to marginalize my work. The fact that I had been interviewed – as a journalist - by FOX News and the BBC in London, and spoken about 9/11 in the capital cities of Europe and the United States meant nothing to the Chicago Tribune and the local paper, the Daily Herald. This was, of course, no simple oversight. These papers know very well who I am. I had been a candidate for mayor in Hoffman Estates in 2001. I have corresponded with these papers for years and was interviewed by an editorial board of two journalists and an editor in the offices of the Daily Herald prior to the special election in 2001. After the police attack at my house, the Chicago Tribune even hired an outside ghost writer from TIME magazine in order to smear me properly. There are two main reasons for the controlled media’s slanted reporting of my case: Firstly, to marginalize my 9/11 research and writing, and secondly, to minimize the signficance of the undercover police action against me at my home (i.e. on my property). It certainly doesn’t look right (or very American) for three heavily-armed undercover police to TASER and break the arm of an American journalist working to find the truth about what really happened on September 11, 2001 – in front of his 8-year-old daughter and wife. The truth could not be told in my case. It’s that simple. The nine-month process in the Cook County Court was equally bizarre and corrupt. Your comments about American media distractions are very apt. As a child, I grew up in a house with no television. The only TV shows I saw were those I watched at a neighbor’s house. I remember watching “Bozo’s Circus” and “The Mickey Mouse Club”. My favorite shows were “The Adventures of Superman” and “The Rifleman” with Chuck Connors.  Chuck Connors as “The Rifleman” These shows were all basic morality plays in which the good guys fought against corruption, crime, and evil – and always won. Because we did not have a TV, my time spent watching television was very limited in comparison to my friends. My mother told us that the average American child watched something like six hours a day, something I found incredible. But Americans really do spend many hours consuming television on a daily basis, most of which is nothing but staged fantasy and propaganda posing as news. This is a huge problem because television shapes and informs the sense of reality for most Americans and what they watch these days isn’t nearly as good as “The Rifleman” was. The same holds true for the demise of American music. When I was young the music we identified with was generally much more optimistic than what kids hear these days.
Did the FBI Murder Ibragim Todashev?
May 30, 2013
Ibragim was indeed unarmed when he was shot seven times - what appears to be once in the back of the head. Like so many of the false claims made by the FBI and law enforcement agencies about the Tsarnaev brothers and the Boston Marathon bombing, we now learn that Ibragim Todashev was not armed when he was shot - 7 times. One week after he was killed, ABC News reported that Ibragim Todashev was not armed when he was shot to death in his Orlando apartment. The FBI, along with two members of the Massachusetts State Police, had been interviewing Todashev for about 5 hours before he was shot after midnight on May 22, 2013. A friend (or friends) of Todashev had been present during most of the interrogation but was sent away by the FBI shortly before the shooting. If the FBI really suspected Todashev of serious crimes, like murder, why was he not being interrogated at a police station or office of the FBI? Why was this interrogation being done in the middle of the night in an apartment complex? According to Hassan Shibly of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the un-armed Todashev had been shot 7 times, once apparently in the back of the head. CAIR is requesting a civil rights investigation into the shooting. A CBS/AP article of May 30, entitled “Ibragim Todashev's father: FBI killed my son ‘execution-style’" reported that photographs of Todashev’s body indicated he had been shot in the back of the head:
At a news conference in Moscow, Abdul-Baki Todashev showed journalists 16 photographs that he said were of his son, Ibragim, in a Florida morgue. He said his son had six gunshot wounds to his torso and one to the back of his head and the pictures were taken by his son's friend, Khusen Taramov… "I'd only seen and heard things like that in the movies — they shoot somebody and then a shot in the head to make sure," Todashev said. "These just aren't FBI agents, they're bandits," he added. It may be that Todashev was shot in the back of the head first and that the shots to his heart and torso followed. What is very clear is that Todashev was murdered. With several armed police officers and FBI agents present in the building there is no logical explanation why lethal force was applied first - rather than non-lethal methods - if in fact there was a need to subdue Todashev. The use of force continuum requires that if a suspect poses a threat the police should first use non-lethal methods before resorting to lethal force. Shibly's claim that Todashev was shot in the back of the head, if true, suggests that he was executed - murdered in cold blood. The Washington Post reported that the FBI agent who shot Todashev may have been alone with Todashev when he was killed. If so, this may indicate that the murder was premeditated and the others were asked to leave the room so that they could not be called as witnesses: An official said that according to one account of the shooting, the other law enforcement officials had just stepped out of the room, leaving the FBI agent alone with Todashev, when the confrontation occurred. The shooting followed hours of questioning by the law enforcement officials that had begun the night before. Todashev’s father said after the shooting that he didn’t believe the FBI’s account of why they killed his son. “My son could never commit a crime, I know my son too well,” Abdul-Baki Todashev, who lives in Chechnya, told the Daily Beast Web site. “He worked helping disabled people in America and did sports, coached other sportsmen. The FBI made up their accusations.” What is also quite obvious is that the FBI lied to the media about Todashev being armed. This is similar to the false claims that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev had been armed when he was found in the boat. The source of these lies is the same FBI who has been caught telling lie after lie about the whole murky saga that began with the Boston bombings. The news reports from May 22 all said that Todashev had been armed with a knife and had attacked an FBI agent, cutting his head. The fact that this was not the case at all indicates that the FBI agents had concocted a false story to cover up the truth about what had led to the killing of Todashev. Is there any part of the FBI story that is true? Is the FBI a completely rogue agency? The FBI is an agency of the Department of Justice. If the FBI is as rogue as it appears to be, the real rot lies at the center of the Department of Justice, which has become what can only be called the "Department of Injustice." It should be remembered that the FBI is the agency that failed to properly investigate 9-11, then under the guidance of Michael Chertoff. Sources: “Advocacy group demands civil rights probe into death of Boston bombing suspect’s Fla. Friend,” Associated Press, May 30, 2013 “Group wants civil rights probe into Ibragim Todashev's killing,” BostonHerald.com, May 30, 2013
“Ibragim Todashev's father: FBI killed my son ‘execution-style’” CBS/AP, May 30, 2013 “Man Linked to Boston Bombing Suspect Was Unarmed When Shot in Violent Encounter With FBI,” ABC News, May 29, 2013 “Muslim civil-rights group calls for DOJ investigation into Todashev shooting,” WFTV.com, May 30, 2013 “Officials: Man who knew Boston bombing suspect was unarmed when shot,” by Sari Horwitz and Peter Finn, Washington Post, May 30, 2013 “Why Did the FBI Kill an Unarmed Man and Clam Up?” by Conor Friedersdorf, TheAtlantic.com, May 30, 2013
Good Video Summary of Israeli Role in 9-11
May 29, 2013 The following 14-minute video is an excellent summary of the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. It touches on many of the key points that I explain in greater detail in the Solving 9-11 set of books. Although I am not mentioned in the video, I am the person who uncovered several of the links that it presents.
On the Need to Resist War Propaganda
Memorial Day, 2013 If any question why we died,
Memorial Day is the holiday in the United States when Americans remember the men and women who died while serving in the military. For Americans who did not lose a loved one in the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, or Vietnam, the three-day holiday means a day off and the beginning of summer. For those who lost someone in these wars, however, Memorial Day is the day the nation commemorates their loss. But the nation cannot feel the pain and suffering that the bereaved families feel every day. While government officials try to lessen the pain of these suffering families by honoring the dead as heroes who died fighting for our freedom and security, the painful truth is that the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam were not fought to defend the nation or any of our freedoms.
There are about 6,713 families in the United States who lost a loved one serving in the military during the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan. (In reality, this number is much larger because many died after returning home due to exposure to depleted uranium and other battlefield toxins.) Left behind are the children, spouses, siblings, and parents of those who died. These families struggle every day to make sense of their loss. Although the survivors may want to believe that their loved one died fighting for America, freedom, and democracy, they cannot avoid the growing awareness that these wars were illegal wars of aggression waged on a pack of lies. I was truly astounded to read that 85 percent of the U.S. military personnel in Iraq were so misinformed that they actually believed that U.S. forces were in Iraq because of its involvement in the terror attacks of 9-11. The fact is, of course, that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11, but that information had obviously not reached most of the U.S. soldiers fighting and dying in Iraq. Likewise, the war in Afghanistan is based on the deception of 9-11 and the pack of lies about who was behind the terror attacks. The lies behind the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were promoted mainly by the big television networks of Fox News, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC. There were also the war propagandists working at the New York Times and other newspapers who spread lies about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction and other threats that did not exist. Based on the lies spread by the media, the American people were deceived about why the nation went to war. To prevent more Americans from being killed in unnecessary wars we should be resolved not to let our nation be deceived into another disastrous war. This means actively resisting the anti-Iran propaganda that is being spread by the media. On Friday, May 24, I was surprised to see an article on Salon.com entitled “Iran hackers aiming at U.S. energy firms.” The posting was written by Natasha Lennard, assistant news editor at Salon.com, and based on an article from the same day in Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal entitled “Iran hacks energy firms, U.S. says.” The Wall Street Journal article begins: WASHINGTON - Iranian-backed hackers have escalated a campaign of cyberassaults against U.S. corporations by launching infiltration and surveillance missions against the computer networks running energy companies, according to current and former U.S. officials. In the latest operations, the Iranian hackers were able to gain access to control-system software that could allow them to manipulate oil or gas pipelines. They proceeded “far enough to worry people,” one former official said. The developments show that while Chinese hackers pose widespread intellectual-property-theft and espionage concerns, the Iranian assaults have emerged as far more worrisome because of their apparent hostile intent and potential for damage or sabotage. While there is no evidence to support the allegations found in the Wall Street Journal article, variations of this article claiming that Iranian hackers are a threat to U.S. infrastructure have now been spread around the world. It looks to me like the anti-Iran propaganda articles are designed to set the stage for a false-flag attack on U.S. infrastructure. Here it needs to be noted that it is Israeli hackers, such as Amit and Naftali (Elad) Yoran, who have made careers out of hacking into U.S. energy companies. The next terror attack in the United States may very well be aimed at our energy infrastructure, but it is not the Iranians who are planning it. We need to be aware of who is promoting the war propaganda in order to expose it and nip such evil plots in the bud.
Because the anti-Iran propaganda may be preparation for a real attack to be used to start another war, I looked into who was promoting the propaganda piece in the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal. Rupert Murdoch of News Corp. and Fox News is the Zionist media mogul who has actively promoted the “War on Terror” and the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.
I began by looking up Natasha Lennard of Salon.com. She is a young woman from Britain who was involved with the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement and the New York Times. When it was discovered that she was an active participant in the OWS movement she left the New York Times and discussed her involvement on "Democracy Now" with Amy Goodman:
As I wrote in Salon this week, I’m not an objective journalist. I, like many hundreds, thousands, millions of people across the country, am quite appalled by the current state of inequality that the system we’re living under has created and would only want to speak in that capacity henceforth. But why would a person involved in the Occupy Wall Street movement be spreading Rupert Murdoch’s vile war propaganda that is clearly designed to make Iran look like a threat to the United States? What I found suggests that Natasha Lennard is not being honest when she says she is "appalled by the current state of inequality." Her step-father is a well-known and highly-paid orthodox Jewish lawyer in the City of London named Jonathan Michael Caplan (QC). Jonathan Caplan recently represented Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers Limited in a criminal case. Caplan was also a core participant in the Leveson Inquiry that examined some of the crimes committed by journalists working for Rupert Murdoch's propaganda empire. One of those criminal journalists was none other than Piers Morgan, who was forced to relocate to the United States after being disgraced in Britain. Americans don't know that he has a criminal background. Natasha Lennard confirmed by email that she is the daughter of Selena A. Caplan (born Selena Anne Peskin), wife of Jonathan Michael Caplan QC. Her real father is Richard Douglas Lennard, the son of Gerald Goldberg, who passed away in Florida in 2005. Natasha’s brother is Alexander Samuel Lennard, an investment fund manager for Ruffer LLC. Jonathan Caplan is also a patron of orthodox Jewish organizations and "The Wiener Library" ("for the study of the Holocaust and Genocide"). Natasha wrote: Those are indeed my family members. I will not reserve my disgust at your having delved into my family connections… Your reasons for researching my family (including estranged members) is disturbing and in need of explanation. I responded: As I said in my email I am very concerned about who is spreading Murdoch's anti-Iran propaganda in the United States. You probably know that the media, especially Rupert Murdoch, played a key role in getting the U.S. into the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. These wars were based on lies and deception, very much like the piece you wrote about Iran hacking into U.S. infrastructure. Your step-father Jonathan Michael Caplan recently worked as a lawyer for Mr. Murdoch defending News Group Newspapers Ltd. and was a core participant in the Leveson Inquiry in which Murdoch's criminal activities were examined... Maybe you should stop working for the warmongers and those who lie to get us into war. Sources and Recommended Reading: "Amit Yoran's Ethical Hackers" in "The Architecture of Terror" by Christopher Bollyn ”California’s War Dead: Military deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, 2001-Present,” Los Angeles Times, May 28, 2013 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9815962/Cash-strapped-expat-wore-down-ailing-sister-in-law-to-change-will.html Icasualties.org on casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan “Iran hackers aiming at U.S. energy firms” by Natasha Lennard, Salon.com, May 24, 2013 “Iran hacks energy firms, U.S. says” by Siobhan Gorman, Danny Yadron, Wall Street Journal, May 24, 2013 Jonathan Michael Caplan QC, TheLawPages.com, May 27, 2013 Natasha Lennard on Democracy Now, November 17, 2011 The Leveson Inquiry, Core Participants
Israeli Prescience of 9-11 and the Fraudulent War on Terror
Updated May 23, 2013
The Boston Marathon bombing is a bizarre case of terrorism for which no organization claimed responsibility. Although the FBI says that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, a 19-year-old Chechen Muslim immigrant, has admitted being involved, the confession was obtained before he had been read his Miranda rights. This is similar to the U.S. government claim that a Guantanamo detainee named Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has confessed to being the “mastermind of 9-11.” Confessions like these, obtained through torture or coercion, are not valid evidence. There are significant contradictions with the FBI account linking the Tsarnaev brothers to the crime. The day after the bombing, for example, Richard DesLauriers, FBI special agent in charge of the investigation, said “both of the explosives were placed in a dark-colored nylon bag or backpack.” Video footage from the marathon, however, shows Dzhokhar carrying a light-colored backpack. Like 9-11, the most suspicious thing about the Boston bombing is the lack of a logical motive. Terrorism is defined as the use of violence in the pursuit of political aims. With 9-11 and the Boston bombing there is no rational reason why anyone would commit such atrocities, except one: to blame the heinous crime on a targeted group. This suggests that 9-11 and the Boston bombing are cases of false-flag terrorism. FAKE TERROR PLOTS The FBI has set up many fake terror plots since 9-11. In an October 2011 article entitled “Government-Generated Plots,” Andrew P. Napolitano, a former Superior Court Judge (NJ), explained: “If you ask the leadership of the FBI… it will tell you that it has foiled about seventeen plots to kill Americans during the past ten years… The seventeen that were interrupted by the feds were created by them… They all have a common and reprehensible thread. They were planned, plotted, controlled, and carried out by the federal government itself.” The first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 was apparently a similar operation with involvement by the FBI. In setting up the "terrorists" the FBI used Emad Salem, a former Egyptian army officer, who served as a highly-paid informant to help entrap the individuals charged with the crime. After 9-11, the FBI, under the supervision of Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff, allowed crucial evidence from the crime scene, such as the structural steel, to be destroyed without being examined. Rather than properly investigating the crime the government blamed Osama Bin Laden without presenting evidence to prove its case. Bin Laden was convicted in the court of public opinion, which swung in favor of waging the “war on terror” and invading both Afghanistan and Iraq. The FBI had extensive contact with the older Tsarnaev, Tamarlan, according to his mother. Zubeidat Tsarnaeva said her son had been under constant FBI surveillance for years: “He was controlled by FBI like for five – three, five years. They knew what my son was doing. They knew what actions and what the sites on Internet he was going. They used to come home, they used to come and talk to me. They used to tell me, you know, that they’re controlling his – they were telling me that he is a really extremist leader and they are afraid of him.” The FBI contact with Tamarlan has led many to suspect that the Tsarnaev brothers have been framed. Given the history of government-generated plots there is good reason for such suspicion. But why is the FBI working to entrap Muslims? What purpose do these fake terror plots serve? 9-11 and the “war on terror” have profoundly changed the way Americans live and how they view the world. The question is, do Americans face a real and genuine threat of terrorism or is it all a hoax designed to instill fear and manipulate public opinion to support U.S. military interventions in the Muslim world? THE ISRAELI REACTION TO 9-11 On 9-11, Ehud Barak, the former Israeli prime minister, called for “an operational, concrete war against terror” on BBC World television – before the towers even fell. On the day of the attacks, James Bennet of the New York Times asked Benjamin Netanyahu what the terror atrocity meant for relations between the United States and Israel. Netanyahu replied, "It's very good… Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy." To understand the Israeli reaction to 9-11 we need to view the terror spectacle as an essential part of a pre-planned Zionist construct known as the “war on terror.” Netanyahu’s odd remark makes sense when we consider that 9-11 is the keystone of a strategy that Netanyahu has been pushing since 1979. While most Americans view 9-11 as the beginning of the "war on terror," 9-11 is really the final piece of a Zionist strategy that was in development for more than two decades. The “war on terror” construct was born at an international conference organized by the Jonathan [Netanyahu] Institute in Jerusalem in July 1979. Menachem Begin, the former Irgun leader who ordered the 1946 bombing of the King David Hotel, became prime minister in 1977. Two years later, Begin headed the committee that arranged the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, an event designed “to launch an international propaganda offensive to promote and exploit the issue of 'international terrorism'," according to Philip Paull’s 1982 thesis “International Terrorism”: The Propaganda War. "The propaganda 'blitz' originated in Jerusalem,” Paull wrote. “The conspiratorial network included present and former members of the Israeli and United States governments,” including George H.W. Bush, along with “seven hundred invited foreign journalists, influential friends of Israel, and top-ranking members of the Israeli military, diplomatic, and intelligence establishment.” “Using the Jerusalem Conference as a fulcrum, the Jonathan Institute fabricated and helped spread misinformation about the worldwide terrorist threat," Paull wrote. The Netanyahu institute was founded by Benjamin Netanyahu and his father, Benzion, the founding chairman. Benzion Netanyahu articulated the purpose of the conference in his opening speech: “This conference was called to serve as the beginning of a new process - the purpose of rallying the democracies of the world to a struggle against terrorism and the dangers it represents.” "This 'anti-terrorist' propaganda campaign was and is being conducted in a style reminiscent of wartime 'psychological warfare' by journalists serving as conduits and spreaders of misinformation originating in Jerusalem," Paull wrote. Spreading the propaganda from the Netanyahu institute began immediately in the mass media. Five days after the conference, the International Herald Tribune declared in its lead editorial, “The Issue is Terrorism.” Echoing his father’s call for a global war on terrorism, Benjamin Netanyahu wrote a series of books with titles like Fighting Terrorism and Terrorism: How the West Can Win. ISRAELI PRESCIENCE OF 9-11 While Benjamin Netanyahu was pushing the propaganda campaign, a former head of Israeli intelligence was predicting a 9-11 type attack that would compel the United States to join Israel’s pre-planned “war on terror.” In 1980, Isser Harel, the veteran Israeli intelligence chief, predicted a terror attack like 9-11 to Michael D. Evans, an American Zionist activist. As Evans wrote, “My last question was would terrorism ever come to America. ‘You have the power to fight it,’ he said, ‘but not the will. They have the will, but not the power. All of that will change in time. Yes, I fear it will come to New York and your tallest building, which is a symbol of your fertility.’” Arnon Milchan, a senior Mossad operative who was later involved in the smuggling of nuclear trigger devices, made a film in 1978 that depicted how such an attack might occur. In Milchan’s Medusa Touch an airliner flies into a high-rise building exploding in a ball of fire. In 2000, Rupert Murdoch, Milchan’s business partner, made The Lone Gunmen, a television film in which a remotely-controlled airliner was flown into the World Trade Center. To film the sequence of the plane flying toward the World Trade Center Murdoch's crew actually used a helicopter to fly the approach to the Twin Towers in 2000. It would be very interesting to know who was involved in the filming of this scene which became real six months after the film aired in March 2001. I would suspect that this filming was actually part of the final planning for the 9-11 attacks. Milchan is called "LAKAM Agent No. 1" in a recent Israeli biography. LAKAM is an acronym for Bureau of Scientific Relations, an Israeli intelligence agency that collected scientific and technical intelligence abroad, particularly for Israel's nuclear program. In the 1980s, when Milchan was involved with Benjamin Netanyahu in the illegal smuggling of nuclear triggers, LAKAM was being run by the Israeli spy-master Rafi Eitan. The coincidence of the Netanyahu conference, Isser Harel’s uncanny prediction of what was to occur on 9-11, and Arnon Milchan’s film depicting the terror spectacle that befell the World Trade Center indicates that such an attack was being discussed and visualized at the highest level of Israeli intelligence in the late 1970s. The fact that veteran Mossad officers who had worked with Isser Harel for decades obtained the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1987 suggests there was a conspiracy afoot to make the Israeli ideation of 9-11 become reality. As I describe in Solving 9-11 (“The Architecture of Terror”), two veteran Israeli intelligence agents, Peter Zvi Malkin and Avraham Bendor (a.k.a. Shalom) had obtained the security contract for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the agency that owned the World Trade Center) for a company called Atwell Security of Tel Aviv. Atwell Security was a company owned by Shaul Eisenberg, the China-based Mossad operative. Zvi Malkin and Avraham Bendor had worked under Rafi Eitan and Isser Harel, the chief of the Mossad, on the kidnapping of Adolf Eichmann in Argentina in 1960. Two years later, as Harel began a covert campaign to kill German rocket scientists, he drafted operational units from the Shin Bet, headed by Zvi Malkin and Rafi Eitan, and one from the Mossad, headed by Yitzhak Shamir. In Operation Damocles, which began in August 1962, the Israeli agents working under Harel used letter bombs and kidnappings to kill German scientists and others.
Rafi Eitan and Bendor were involved in the theft of a large amount of weapons-grade uranium in the United States in 1968. They traveled with two other Israeli agents to a nuclear plant in Apollo, Penn., from where large amounts of weapons-grade uranium disappeared and were diverted to Israel. This smuggling of weapons-grade uranium from the United States would have directly involved Shimon Peres, the godfather of Israel’s nuclear arsenal. Later, in 1985, the same group of agents was implicated in the smuggling of more than 800 nuclear triggers (krytrons) to Israel, using Arnon Milchan (the Mossad film maker) as the main connection and conduit for the smuggling. Benjamin Netanyahu worked for Milchan’s company at the time. In the same year the Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard was discovered working under Rafi Eitan. Eitan has always considered the United States to be an enemy of Israel: "I failed in the Pollard affair, just as I failed in other intelligence operations beyond enemy lines," Eitan said in an interview with Yediot Aharonot in June 1997. In all of these operations, including the attempt to obtain the security contract for the World Trade Center, the same small group of veteran Israeli terrorists/criminals is involved: Yitzhak Shamir, Shimon Peres, Isser Harel, Rafi Eitan, Peter Zvi Malkin, Avraham Bendor (Shalom), Shaul Eisenberg, Arnon Milchan, and Benjamin Netanyahu. Malkin and Bendor had officially retired when they tried to get the security contract, which was cancelled only after it was discovered that Bendor was using a false name and had been involved in the murder of Palestinians in 1984 while working as the head of Shin Bet under Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir. After failing to secure the Atwell security contract for the World Trade Center, Shalom then went to work for Kroll Associates and Maurice Greenberg after being forced to resign as head of the Shin Bet in 1986 due to a scandalous murders two years earlier of Palestinians by Shin Bet agents. Kroll then obtained the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1993 and was responsible for security until 9-11. Understanding the intellectual origins of the 9-11 plot and how it was essential to the realization of the Israeli strategy known as the “war on terror” helps to clarify the real motive for the crime that changed the world. Identifying the Israeli intelligence agents involved in the ideation and preparation of the 9-11 terror attacks exposes a small group of veteran Zionist criminals who have employed terrorism as a tool since the 1940s.
Sources and Recommended Reading: “A Day of Terror: The Israelis; Spilled Blood Is Seen as Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer” by James Bennet, New York Times, September 12, 2001 “Arnon Milchan – ‘Mr. Israel’ and 9/11” by Christopher Bollyn, October 4, 2011 Arnon Milchan, Wikipedia Ehud Barak interview, BBC World television, September 11, 2001 Emad Salem, Wikipedia “Government-Generated Plots” by Andrew P. Napolitano, LewRockwell.com, October 14, 2011 ”International Terrorism”: The Propaganda War, Philip Paull, Thesis for a Master of Arts degree in International Relations, San Francisco State University, 1982 “Jimmy Carter: Radical Islam’s Ally” by Michael D. Evans, May 2007 LEKEM (LAKAM), Wikipedia Maurice Greenberg, 9-11 Encyclopedia, May 23, 2013 Medusa Touch (film), Wikipedia Menachem Begin, Wikipedia Remarks of Special Agent in Charge Richard DesLauriers at Press Conference on Bombing Investigation, FBI Boston, April 16, 2013 “The 9/11 Cover Up - The Destruction of the Steel Evidence” by Christopher Bollyn, May 5, 2011 “The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9/11” by Christopher Bollyn, Solving 9-11 The Lone Gunmen (TV series), Wikipedia “Who Destroyed the 9/11 Evidence?” by Christopher Bollyn, December 2010 World Trade Center Bombing (1993), Wikipedia Zubeidat Tsarnaeva Manuscript, Lybio.net
Judge's Son Worked for Defendant in 9-11 Litigation
May 22, 2013 “In the three years since 9-11, we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.” For the past twelve years, the New York Times has utterly failed to investigate the events of 9-11. As the leading newspaper of New York City, the Times has actually played a key role in the 9-11 cover-up by concealing important facts and evidence that disprove the official version of events. Three years after the attacks the editorial board of the paper articulated its intention not to investigate 9-11 and to keep the public ignorant of what really happened saying, "we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.” The New York Times has maintained its position of ignoring the facts of 9-11 for 12 years. Its latest contribution to the 9-11 cover-up is a May 15 article entitled "Court Penalizes a Lawyer Over Slurs in a 9/11 Filing," written by Benjamin Weiser. This is an article about sanctions against 9-11 widow Ellen Mariani and her lawyer for their motion to the court. What the Times doesn't say with even one word is what the motions are about. Benjamin Weiser is a veteran court reporter and certainly knows that the reader deserves to know what Mariani's motions were about, but there is nothing in the article to inform the reader of the essence of her motions. Rather, Weiser emphasizes the "anti-Semitic" tone of the motion: In its ruling on Wednesday, the panel cited Ms. Mariani’s second appeal, calling it frivolous because it persisted in making arguments that had been clearly rejected. But the judges, Peter W. Hall and Susan L. Carney, also noted that the appeal briefs featured “an escalating series of ad hominem attacks on opposing counsel and bombastic challenges to the integrity” of Judge [Alvin] Hellerstein. They cited one brief which they said “consisted of little more than a series of offensive insinuations, unmistakably anti-Semitic, about Judge Hellerstein, his family members, their professional work and some of their personal charitable activities.” THE REAL ISSUE The essence of the Mariani motion deals with the appearance of a conflict of interest on the part of U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, the judge who handled all of the 9-11 litigation. There are other conflicts of interest presented in Mariani's motion, but I will focus here on the one concerning Judge Hellerstein. Judge Hellerstein's son, Joseph Z. Hellerstein, has lived in Israel since 2001 where he works as a lawyer. As a lawyer, Joseph Hellerstein worked for a company called B.O.S. Better Online Systems Ltd.
At the time that he worked for B.O.S. the owners and directors of the company were the same men (Boaz Harel and Edouard Cukierman) who owned and controlled ICTS NV, the Israeli airport security/passenger screening company that was a key defendant in the 9-11 litigation. ICTS NV owned Huntleigh USA, which was directly responsible for passenger screening operations at Boston's Logan Airport on 9-11. In a proper 9-11 trial ICTS would have to answer questions such as how the terrorist hijackers got on the planes without being on the passenger lists. Thanks to Judge Hellerstein there was no trial for the 9-11 victims so ICTS will not have to answer any of the hard questions about what they did at Boston airport on 9-11.
This conflict of interest is covered in the Code of Conduct for United States Judges (published at www.uscourts.gov) which states [see Canon 3(C)(1)(d)(ii)]: A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances in which … the judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person related to either within the third degree of relationship, or the spouse of such a person is … acting as a lawyer in the proceeding…
Ezra Harel, the brother of Boaz Harel, owned a controlling interest in ICTS at the time of the 9-11 terrorist attacks. He owned 65 percent of ICTS when he supposedly died of a heart attack at the age of 53 in 2003. The Ezra Harel Family Estate retained majority ownership of ICTS as of 2004. Boaz Harel was a member of the supervisory board of ICTS from January 1, 1996, to November 12, 2001, and he was chairman of that board from March 2004 to August 2004. Boaz Harel is also president and Managing Partner at Cukierman and Company. He was also a Member of the Board of Directors of Better Online Solutions (“BOS”), an Israeli company, from May 2003 to February 2004. The following are extracts from BusinessWeek's bio of Boaz Harel about his positions at ICTS and BOS: Mr. Boaz Harel is the President and Senior Partner at Catalyst Investments L.P. ... Mr. Harel was a Co-Managing Director of Leedan International Holdings B.V. From December 1993 to December 1997, he served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Leedan Business Enterprise Ltd. Mr. Harel worked in Leedan’s New York office from June 1996 to January 2001. In 1990, he co-founded Mashik- Research & Systems for Business Development Ltd. Mr. Harel also served as Consultant to ICTS International N.V. Mr. Harel served as the Chairman of ICTS USA (1994), Inc. He also served as the Chairman and Member of the Supervisory Board of ICTS International N.V. from March 2004 to August 2004. Prior to this, Mr. Harel was a Member of the Supervisory Board of ICTS from January 1, 1996 to November 12, 2001. From May 2003 to February 2004, he was a Member of the Board of Directors of BOS - Better Online Solutions Ltd. and also a Member of the Board of Directors of its subsidiary, Boscom Ltd. These connections clearly show that Joseph Hellerstein was working for people who were defendants in the 9-11 tort litigation at the time his father was managing that process. There is no question that this relationship presents a conflict of interest on the part of Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein in the 9-11 litigation in which not a single victim's case ever went to trial. The New York Times, however, does not want the public to know about the Zionist connections to 9-11 and the cover-up so it ignores them completely and calls the Mariani motion that addresses them "anti-Semitic." It should be noted that Judge Susan Laura Carney, who ruled to punish the victim for pointing out the blatant conflict of interest, is married to Lincoln Caplan, a member of the editorial board of the New York Times. Lincoln Caplan is a son of the B'nai B'rith, the Jewish (Zionist) order of Freemasons that controls the Anti-Defamation League and Hillel. Both of Caplan's grandfathers were members of the Horeb Lodge of New Haven. The New York Times is also owned by a leading family of Jewish Freemasons belonging to the B'nai B'rith. The B'nai B'rith is an exclusive secret society only for Jews to which many lawyers and judges belong. Such secret societies breed corruption and conspiracies because the members have sworn an oath of secrecy and loyalty to support and protect other members of the order. The B'nai B'rith is also exclusively Zionist in its ideology. Sources and Recommended Reading: “9-11 Defendant's Ties to Judge Ignored by U.S. Court of Appeals” by Christopher Bollyn, July 12, 2012 Ellen Mariani Legal Defense Fund Hellerstein & Co., website for Joseph Z. Hellerstein's Israeli law firm, May 23, 2013 "Judge Hellerstein's Unethical Connection to Key Defendant in 9-11 Lawsuit" by Christopher Bollyn, May 10, 2010 "Why the New York Times is Anti-American" by Christopher Bollyn, January 9, 2013 "Widow's Motion Exposes 9-11 Judge's Ties to Israeli Defendant ICTS" by Christopher Bollyn, May 2, 2012
How Iranians Vote
May 13, 2013
The Islamic Republic of Iran will have a presidential election on June 14, 2013. As an observer of elections in different countries I find that Iranian election procedures are very similar to those of the most democratic elections held in European nations, such as France. Iranians vote on paper ballots that are counted openly in each polling place in the presence of observers. The tally from each polling station is then verified openly and published by the government after the election. These are the most fundamental and essential elements of a transparent and democratic election, and these are exactly the elements that are sadly missing from elections in the United States. It may come as a surprise but Iranian elections are much more transparent that elections in the United States. The voting process and the counting of the votes in Iran are transparent processes, while most votes in the United States are cast and counted on electronic voting systems run by private companies. The use of computer voting systems in the United States has actually allowed our elections to be stolen because the citizenry has lost its oversight of the crucial vote-counting process entirely. Today, there is virtually no open counting of the votes in polling stations in the United States because nearly all voting "data" is processed in computerized systems - not counted by citizens.
I recently read Going to Tehran (2013) by Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett. This is an excellent and timely book that calls for the United States to come to terms with the Islamic Republic of Iran. It is highly recommended reading and should help Americans understand why it is in the best interest of our nation to change course and stop trying to overthrow the Islamic Republic with economic sanctions, covert actions, and threats of war. The Leveretts have served as high-level policy advisors on Iran in various departments and agencies of the U.S. government. In Chapter 6, “A Controversial Election,” they discuss the 2009 election in Iran. On page 246 they describe how Iranians vote and how the votes are counted: Every Iranian aged eighteen or over, including those living abroad, may vote; in 2009, the Iranian government operated polling stations for expatriates in almost a hundred countries, including the United States. To vote, an Iranian must show an official ID with the bearer’s photograph, thumbprint, and a unique number. At the polling station, the voter’s name and ID number are recorded three times: by hand in a register, on a computer, and again by hand on the voter’s ballot stub. Before casting the ballot, the voter must press a purple-ink thumbprint onto the stub, which is then separated from the ballot and dropped into a “stub box.” (Separation of the stub prior to the casting of the ballot ensures the secrecy of the vote.) The voter marks the ballot and drops it into the ballot box; the voter’s ID card is then stamped, to prevent him or her from voting again. Source: Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic of Iran by Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett, Metropolitan Books, New York, 2013
The FBI's Fake Terror Plots - Judge Napolitano
May 5, 2013 Is terrorism a real and genuine threat to Americans or is the whole thing just a giant hoax? Were the terror attacks of 9-11 and the foiled terror plots that followed all contrived to scare the public and change the relationship between the people and the government? Is the threat of terrorism and the "War on Terror" just a big con job? It should be noted that the first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 was set up by the FBI. In setting up the "terrorists" the FBI paid $1 million to Emad Salem, a former Egyptian army officer who served as a FBI informant while entrapping the suspects who were subsequently charged with the crime. Eight years later, when the World Trade Center was bombed and destroyed on 9-11, the FBI working under Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff oversaw the "non-investigation" of the crime. The FBI facilitated the cover-up of the truth by allowing the crucial evidence from the World Trade Center to be destroyed before it could be examined. To understand how the 9-11 cover-up was carried out it is essential to understand that the crime that took the lives of nearly 3,000 people was not properly investigated as a crime by the federal agency obliged to do so. With this in mind, listen to what Judge Andrew Napolitano says about the FBI's history of fake terror plots in the decade since 9-11: Can the federal government take credit for saving us from a plot of its own creation? The FBI has foiled about 17 plots to kill Americans during the past ten years… the 17 that were interrupted by the feds – were created by the feds… they all have a common and reprehensible thread: they were planned, plotted, controlled, and carried out by the federal government itself.
Sources and Recommended Reading: “Government-Generated Plots” by Andrew P. Napolitano, LewRockwell.com, October 14, 2011 “The FBI's Fake Terror Plots and 9-11” by Christopher Bollyn, December 5, 2011
Beware the Ides of May: U.S. Navy Exercise near Iran
April 10, 2013
Naval exercises are meant to be as realistic as possible. War games and military exercises near a hostile nation can lead to serious consequences, even war, which is why it is important for the public to understand the risks involved. Next month, from May 6 to May 30, the U.S. Navy will be conducting a large-scale naval exercise involving mines and drones very close to the territorial waters of Iran. This is an extremely risky exercise because the current Israeli regime, which is known for its expertise in terror attacks, is pushing hard for the United States to take military action against Iran. Given the chance, there can be little doubt that the Israelis would carry out a false-flag attack to instigate a war with Iran. This is a very real danger that has to be understood. The U.S. Navy will be engaged in the International Mine Countermeasures Exercise (IMCMEX 13) in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman during the month of May 2013. The 25-day exercise will involve personnel from the navies of 30 nations, according to a press release from the U.S. Navy: Representatives from more than 30 nations will gather May 6-30 in Bahrain and waters of the Gulf region for International Mine Countermeasures Exercise (IMCMEX) 13. The largest exercise of its kind in the region, IMCMEX 13 will exercise a wide spectrum of defensive operations designed to protect international commerce and trade; mine countermeasures, maritime security operations (MSO) and maritime infrastructure protection (MIP). Since the U.S. Navy does not identify the thirty nations involved in the exercise, it may be that the Israeli navy is one of the participants. In any case the exercise will bring U.S. naval vessels and others very close to Iranian waters, if not into them, which presents an opportunity ripe for treachery. Those who want to instigate hostilities with Iran could do so by carrying out some sort of provocative false-flag action, such as an attack on a vessel from either side. The Israelis have modern stealthy German-built submarines and could provoke hostilities by attacking a vessel - or even Iran - during the exercise, for example. In last year's exercise, IMCMEX 12, the operations included "underwater improvised explosive devices," like the hidden bombs of unknown origin that have killed and maimed so many Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan: In the second phase, ships, crews and observers got underway to conduct training in at-sea maneuvers, mine hunting operations, helicopter mine countermeasures (MCM) operations, and international Explosive Ordnance Disposal operations. Small boat operations focused toward underwater improvised explosive devices. PRECEDENTS APLENTY It was during exactly such a naval exercise by NATO and other navies that the Baltic ferry Estonia was sunk in September 1994, taking the lives of about 1,000 civilians. The Russian submarine Kursk sank during another. An anti-terror drill was being conducted in London when bombs went off in July 2005 - in exactly the same places the drill had prepared for. Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu was actually on the scene for that false-flag terror event. The false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 occurred during several military drills, one of which simulated an aircraft smashing into a military building near the Pentagon, the National Reconnaissance Office. Another exercise actually involved fake hijacked aircraft, which completely confused air traffic controllers who had no idea what was real and what was fake when the exercise became reality. The attacks of 9-11 were exploited by the Zionist war party to bring the U.S. into two extremely costly and disastrous wars in the Middle East. It is wise to be prudent and constantly aware of the very real possibility of more false-flag treachery being used to start another. Sources and Recommended Reading: “IMCMEX12 Military Exercise Concludes,” U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs, September 27, 2012 “Nations to Gather for IMCMEX 13,” U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs, April 8, 2013 “The Terror Drills That Became Real: 9/11, the London Bombings & the Sinking of Estonia,” by Christopher Bollyn “U.S. Allies Plan Big Gulf Naval Exercise In May,” Reuters, April 9, 2013
Bollyn Discusses the 9-11 Discovery on Park Place
May 6, 2013 On Friday, May 3, I discussed the discovery of part of a Boeing 767 at Park Place on American Freedom Radio with Kevin Barrett. The archive of Barrett's shows on American Freedom Radio is at: http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Truth_Jihad_Radio_13.html I was on for the first hour of the May 3 (05/03/2013) show, which can be listened to at:
The Mystery of the Landing Gear on Park Place
Updated May 3, 2013 The discovery of a piece of a 'landing gear' from a Boeing 767 in a narrow space between two buildings near the World Trade Center is a mystery. What aircraft is the piece from and how did it get there are two of the first questions that need to be answered.
The discovery of a piece of Boeing landing gear in an empty space between two buildings near the World Trade Center raises a number of questions. The suspicion that the piece had been planted was raised in the earliest reports of the discovery. The New York police have admitted that it may very well have been lowered into the space: "We are also looking at the possibility that it was lowered by a rope," said Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. "We are not ruling it out...there’s a rope that is intertwined in the part itself." NBC New York reports that Kelly noted that "there were no marks on the buildings indicating the piece hit the walls on the way down. 'It would have had to fall down at a certain angle,' [he] said." It should be noted that this piece is probably quite heavy and dense and would have been traveling with a great deal of inertia behind it. The alley that it was found in is roughly perpendicular to the direction the piece would have been flying if it came from the plane that struck the South Tower. This means that it would have had to hit the back wall of the Murray Street building to lose its forward momentum, which would have most likely broken the wall. As Police Commissioner Kelly says, "there were no marks on the buildings." There are a number of questions that need to be answered about this piece of landing gear: What aircraft did it come from? Are there any time-tracked numbered parts that would identify the aircraft it is from? How did it get into the tight space between the building without leaving significant damage and marks as it came flying into the building with great momentum? Who will take charge of the investigation? The New York Police Department or the F.B.I.? Will this discovery result in the F.B.I. releasing the photographs of the 9-11 damage that occurred to buildings on Park Place? What objects from the aircraft caused the damage and where are the photographs of them? NEW QUESTIONS RAISED An April 29 Newsday article entitled "Officials: Aircraft part found near Ground Zero not landing gear" raises new questions about the aircraft part found behind 51 Park Place near the World Trade Center: According to the Newsday article, the aircraft part has been identified as part of a wing flap control system. Boeing officials said the piece was part of a flap actuation support structure from a Boeing 767. Newsday reported that the NYPD "clarified" why a piece of rope was found on the flap support. When police first responded to reports of the wreckage last week they used the rope to move it to look for a serial number or other identifiers, officials said. The piece reportedly weighs 255 pounds (about 116 kg). How could a NYPD police officer even think that he could move such a massive piece? Would that not be tampering with evidence at a crime scene? Is this just a convenient cover story to explain the presence of the rope? Question: How is it that the police commissioner did not know this story about the rope when he made his comments to the press? He told the press, "We are also looking at the possibility that it was lowered by a rope." The Newsday article, like others before it, says it is impossible to say for certain from which plane the 5-foot-tall piece came from. Videos of the south tower being hit during the attack showed a fiery explosion and an ejection of debris that appeared to go a few blocks north of Ground Zero. Question: Which plane? 51 Park Place is several hundred meters from the Twin Towers. The location of the piece on Park Place is about 450 meters (1,476 feet) from the nearest wall of the former South Tower and about 350 meters (1,148 feet) from the North Tower. It is, therefore, highly unlikely, if not impossible, that this piece came from the plane that struck the North Tower. It did not bounce back from the building 1,000 feet nor was it thrown that far by the explosive demolition of the tower. If this piece came from either plane it must have come from the plane that struck the South Tower. The Newsday article concluded saying that once sifting is completed the NYPD's emergency services unit will remove the flap support and keep it at the department's property storage facility, said spokesman Paul Browne. Question: Will there not be a complete forensic examination of this piece to determine which aircraft it came from? If not, why not? Why have the time-tracked parts on the other pieces of aircraft found near the World Trade Center not been shown to the public? Are we to assume that the time-tracked parts have not been examined to determine which aircraft they were installed on and when? Sources and Recommended Reading:
“Officials: Aircraft part found near Ground Zero not landing gear” by Anthony M. Destefano, Newsday, April 29, 2013 "The 'Huge Bullet Hole' in the South Tower and Analysis of Missile Evidence" by Christopher Bollyn, April 17, 2011
Who is Jeff Prager?
May 3, 2013 Maybe Bollyn and the Truth Movement aren't what they appear to be? Did anyone bother to think that the people that perpetrated 911 spent even MORE TIME developing and strategizing how they would deal with public opinion AFTER the event then they did planning the event itself? Perhaps 911 was SO COMPLEX that very few people will ever understand what really happened, WHY and how. I challenge Bollyn. He's lying. SO, WHO IS JEFF PRAGER?
We believe that only mini-nukes — which were probably neutron bombs — planted in the center columns of the buildings, detonated from top to bottom and configured to explode upward, can explain what is observed. PRAGER AND HIS MINI-NUKE THEORY I received an email the other day asking me about Jeff Prager’s writings about the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9-11 being a nuclear event. In his most recent article, written with Don Fox and Ed Ward, Prager says, “only mini-nukes… can explain what is observed.” Prager writes he and his co-authors “believe” that mini-nukes, “probably neutron bombs,” were planted in the core columns of the buildings, but in a recent video he goes further in stating his conviction that the Twin Towers were demolished with mini-nukes, saying, “I have actual proof that it was.” If he has “actual proof” that mini-nukes brought down the Twin Towers, I wonder why he uses the word “believe” in the article? If one has proof that something is true, it is not a question of belief. If Prager has proof that mini-nukes were used, he should present his proof to show the rest of the world that his 9-11 nuclear demolition theory is true. This is what the email said: Hello Christopher: A while back I figured out that Jeff Prager was the author of this: Today on Veterans Today he published this: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/01/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/ I thought you'd be interested. My thoughts: 1. Why? There were certainly multiple motives behind 9/11. Why rule out stolen gold? 2. How? There were certainly multiple means behind 9/11. Why rule out mini nukes? 3. Who? There were certainly multiple perpetrators behind 9/11. Why rule out the Bush CIA gang? Although I had heard of Jeff Prager before, I didn’t really know who he was, so I began by doing a little research. WHO IS THE REAL JEFF PRAGER? Apart from promoting his mini-nuke theory, Prager also attacks me and Steven E. Jones, the professor who found chips of active thermitic material (super-thermite) in the dust of the demolished Twin Towers. While one can clearly and honestly say that Jones has found proof that super-thermite was involved in the destruction of the Twin Towers, Prager and his colleagues are dedicated to trying to disprove (in the public mind) the thermite theory with their mini-nuke theory. Does the discovery of chips of super-thermite mean nothing to them? Prager also does not like my Solving 9-11 work and even says that I am lying, although he does not say where or how I am lying. The following discussion about my book (the online version) is from Prager’s website “Fighting for Liberty”. Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World Christopher Bollyn PDF Well what do you effing know, I just started reading Bollyn's book just last night! So far I am enormously impressed. I've been aware of it for at least a year now, but you know how things go, so much going on you can't possibly remain focused on anything for very long. I believe this book is THE book to read, for those who want to know WHO really pulled 9/11 off, and frankly I believe most of the 9/11 Truth movement has it COMPLETELY WRONG when they want to pin it all on Bush/Cheney. They certainly had something to do with it (NORAD stand-down in the case of Cheney), but they were clearly NOT the masterminds! Everyone should read this book, because the real culprits behind 9/11 are going to get away scot-free if they aren't brought to justice ASAP!! Reply by Jeff on June 5, 2011 at 9:27am WHY does Bollyn NOT discuss ANYTHING in these PDF's? WHY doesn't the 911 Truth Movement discuss ANYTHING in these PDFs? Maybe Bollyn and the Truth Movement aren't what they appear to be? Did anyone bother to think that the people that perpetrated 911 spent even MORE TIME developing and strategizing how they would deal with public opinion AFTER the event then they did planning the event itself? Perhaps 911 was SO COMPLEX that very few people will ever understand what really happened, WHY and how. I challenge Bollyn. He's lying. Prager says I am lying, but doesn’t say where or how. In the same way Prager claims to have “actual proof” that mini-nukes brought down the World Trade Center and that only nuclear bombs “can explain what is observed” during the demolition of the Twin Towers. If he has proof that I am lying, he should present it to the public so people can decide for themselves who is lying - and who is not. Likewise with his claim that he has “actual proof” to support his mini-nuke theory. If he has evidence or proof, he should present it to the public so that experts can determine the veracity of his claim. Why would Prager be attacking me and calling me a liar if he is not willing to show where or how I am lying? Is he just another disinfo agent who has been tasked to attack Dr. Jones and me - and the real evidence of thermite? Is his mini-nuke theory just another red herring to distract people by confusing them about the real evidence of super-thermite found in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers? If so, why would he be doing that? Who is he working for?
Sources: Jeff Prager profile, WritingRoom.com Maricopa County Dead Beat Parents Hall of Shame, "Wanted: Jeffrey J. Prager" “Mini-Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle” by Don Fox, Clare Kuehn, Jeff Prager, Jim Viken and Dr. Ed Ward (with Dennis Cimino and Jim Fetzer), posted by Jim Fetzer (Editor), VeteransToday.com, October 29, 2012 “Mystery Solved: The WTC was Nuked on 9/11” by Don Fox, Ed Ward, M.D., and Jeff Prager, posted by Jim Fetzer (Editor), VeteransToday.com, May 1, 2013 “Sandy Hook Revealed by Jeff Prager,” YouTube.com, January 2, 2013
Eyewitness Saw Police SUV Run Over Tamarlan Tsarnaev
April 29, 2013
From the beginning, I found the official explanation that Dzhokhar ran over his own brother and was able to flee from the police hard to believe. It simply did not make sense that the 19-year-old Dzhokhar could just drive away from hordes of police with their weapons drawn and high-powered cop cruisers at hand. Furthermore, there were no reports of a police chase using vehicles.
The following eyewitness testimony to a Boston radio show on Friday, April 19, makes much more sense: On Friday, April 19, an eyewitness named Linda called in to WEEI (93.7 FM) in Boston saying that she saw a police SUV run over Tamarlan Tsarnaev. Linda said she witnessed the late-night “shootout” on Dexter Street in Watertown. She described seeing “the first suspect,” Tamerlan Tsarnaev, run over by a police SUV and then mortally wounded by multiple police gun shots. When asked to confirm if it was a police SUV that ran over the suspect, Linda replies, “correct.” The 7-minute radio clip with Linda is here: http://audio.weei.com/a/73784687/linda-calls-in-to-describe-the-scene-on-dexter-st-in-watertown.htm
Sources and Recommended Reading:
“Eyewitness Boston Suspect was run over by police SUV , no bombs,” Disclose.tv, April 22, 2013 “Eyewitness: ‘Tamerlan was run over by Boston police and then shot multiple times’,” 21st Century Wire, April 27, 2013
The Boston Bombings - "Terror is Theatre"
Updated April 26, 2013 FBI/POLICE LIES UNRAVEL FURTHER Officials now say that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was un-armed when the FBI and the army of police opened fire on the small boat in which he was apparently hiding. The police had originally reported that he had fired at them from under the tarp. Earlier, they had said that the Tsarnaev brothers had robbed a 7-11 store. It was even speculated that he had shot himself in the neck. All of these reports turned out to be false. The FBI, which was in charge, must have known upon arresting Dzhokhar that he did not have a weapon. So, where did the report come from that he did? Who is writing the official lies that have been spread about the Tsarnaev brothers? Is this incompetence or is it part of the master plan to convict the Tsarnaevs in the court of public opinion without presenting any evidence? What other parts of the Boston story are lies? If Dzhokhar was un-armed in the boat it raises the question, was he even involved in the shoot-out? Did he really run over his own brother and escape from a whole horde of police with weapons drawn? If he was in the shoot-out, what happened to his weapon? How did the police let him get away so easily? Was someone else playing the role of Dzhokhar and allowed to get away?
Terror is theatre... Theatre's a con trick. Do you know what that means? Con trick? You've been deceived.
QUESTION No. 1 - ARE THE TSARNAEV BOYS THE BOMBERS? Among items partially recovered are pieces of black nylon—which could be from a backpack—and what appear to be fragments of BBs and nails possibly contained in a pressure cooker device… In addition, this morning, it was determined that both of the explosives were placed in a dark-colored nylon bag or backpack. The bag would have been heavy because of the components believed to be in it. Among all the claims and allegations made by the FBI and the media about Tamarlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev the only one that really matters is whether they carried out the bombings at the Boston Marathon. If they did, they must have brought the bombs, which would have weighed at least 20 pounds (10 kilos) each, in the backpacks they were seen carrying. If the devices were pressure cooker bombs packed with ball bearings, BB's, and nails, as alleged, these would have been very heavy and large objects that would have weighed as much as 5 bags of sugar, for example. Such a heavy and dense object would be noticeable as it would pull hard on the straps of the backpack and stretch it out of shape. These effects can not be seen on the backpacks being carried by the Tsarnaev brothers, strongly suggesting that they did not carry the bombs as alleged. IS WHITE THE SAME AS BLACK? Furthermore, the FBI says that both bombs were in black bags, but Dzhokhar's bag is clearly white or silver/grey. It is definitely not black. So what is the evidence linking him to either bomb?
THE ISRAELI DOCTORS AT BETH ISRAEL In what may be the final act of the Boston Marathon terror spectacle, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the 19-year-old alleged to have carried out the bombing, "clings to life" in Beth Israel (House of Israel) Medical Center, where he is being treated by two Israeli doctors. This raises the question, who decided to take him there? Is the fact that the alleged terrorist is being held and cared for in an Israeli-run hospital just a coincidence or is it part of the master plan? If Tsarnaev dies in Beth Israel the terror case will be closed with no one left to talk. That the Tsarnaev brothers were taken to a hospital being run by Israelis is very similar to the murders of Anna Lindh and Princess Di in which the ambulance personnel made sure these women did not survive their wounds. Will Dzhokhar Tsarnaev die in the final scene under the care of his Israeli doctors?
Dr. Kevin (Ilan) Tabb, president and CEO of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center told Israeli media that Tsarnaev is in stable condition but that because of wounds to his throat, he may never be able to speak again. "We have a few Israeli doctors in the emergency room, and the director of the ER is also Israeli,” Tabb said.
Daniel Talmor, the Israeli physician who heads the ER told Israel Army Radio that Tsarnaev has "serious injuries, but I believe he will live." Talmor added that the suspect is in isolation with "very, very tight security." WHAT KIND OF SECURITY?
"THE RAID IS ISSUED TO OCCUR ON FRIDAY"
In the afternoon of April 18, 2013, the FBI released a photo of its two suspects in the terror bombing of the Boston Marathon. It should be noted that the FBI's suspects are dressed in the exact same way as other suspicious characters seen toting heavy black backpacks near the finish line. This suggests that this operation may have involved agents in the crowd dressed in the same manner as the FBI's suspects. It should be noted that it is the agents, not the suspects, who appear to have been carrying the really heavy backpacks containing the bombs.
The suspect being sought by the FBI fits the age description ("a male late teens to early 20s") found in this comment. The comment and photos had been seen by nearly 3 million viewers when the FBI presented the photos of its suspects. If the comment is correct, as it seems to be, it would suggest that the architects will have to change their plans because of the leaked information.
The terror bombings at the finish line of the Boston Marathon were a heinous spectacle of pure terror, which is exactly what they were meant to be. This spectacle of terror is so evil and senseless that I cannot understand how any American would do such a thing to innocent people watching a race. There is, of course, no rational reason why anyone would commit such an atrocity - except one: to blame the heinous crime on a targeted group. This is why I added the essential quote from John Le Carré's book about Israeli false-flag terrorism to the title: Terror is theatre... Theatre's a con trick. Do you know what that means? Con trick? You've been deceived. I would advise keeping this thought firmly in mind as the Boston bombing story develops. A terror bombing of this sort, at the finish line of the Boston Marathon, is done solely to achieve maximum effect on public opinion. We are all part of the target audience as we wait to see how this tragedy will unfold - and what it will mean for us. One thing to remember is that this terror attack in Boston is most likely a convoluted plot, with layers of deception, like a Russian Matryoshka doll, where inside each doll lies another concealed doll. If the suspicious characters in the photos above are in fact the real culprits, they would have to be pretty stupid to make themselves so obvious in one of the most photographed places in America on April 15. How could a terrorist expect to walk around with a heavy bomb in a backpack at the finish line of the Boston Marathon and not be caught on camera? Yet somebody must have placed the bombs and with all of the surveillance cameras in the area that person must have expected that they would be caught on film. When looking at the images of the suspicious characters carrying backpacks near the finish line in Boston, it looks to me to be an operation very similar to the murder of Anna Lindh in which there were several agents wearing identical clothes going up and down the stairs of the NK store in Stockholm. All of the agents were decoys except for the one who stabbed Anna Lindh to death, who was dressed just like the Serbian man they arrested. The same tactic may have been used at the Boston Marathon. There were only two bombs that exploded, but there are several suspects. The question is who really placed the bombs? It would seem that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev did not have a heavy enough backpack to carry a bomb, while another fellow in a white cap, who is later seen apparently without his bag, carried a very heavy backpack. The body language of his partner in blue, with his hand near his mouth, suggests that he is very nervous. Are these two part of the terror team that made the bombing happen? WHICH MAN IN THE WHITE CAP? Jeff Bauman, the victim who lost his legs, reportedly helped identify the bomber. As reported in The Telegraph (UK): Mr Bauman was waiting to see his girlfriend finish the race when a man in a white cap and sweatshirt dropped a backpack at his feet. The 27-year-old lost both his legs in the explosion. Despite being heavily drugged, Mr Bauman got word to the authorities that he had seen one of the bombers. He told FBI investigators that he looked in the eyes of Tamerlan Tsarnaev as he planted the bomb. He went on to identify him in a photograph. Bauman's testimony actually indicates that it was not Tamarlan Tsarnaev he saw place the bomb at his feet. Tamarlan is wearing a dark cap and a substantial jacket - not a sweatshirt. Dzhokar Tsarnaev is wearing a white cap, but he is not wearing a sweatshirt nor is he carrying anything heavy enough to be a bomb. Furthermore, the reports say that Bauman identified Tamarlan as the one who placed the bag. None of this fits. The person Bauman saw place the bomb was wearing a white hat and a sweatshirt and evidently looked Middle Eastern - just like the suspect in the photo below. The person in the photo below fits all the characteristics of Bauman's description. The fact that this person was then photographed without his backpack suggests that he is the real bomber - not Tamarlan Tsarnaev. This is a person of interest who absolutely should be questioned.
AMERICA IS GREAT BECAUSE SHE IS GOOD The thought that was going through my head the day before the bombing was this sentence, which is often used and mis-attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville, author of Democracy in America: America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great. The logic of this statement, whoever said it, is pretty simple: America is, or was, strong and great because of her goodness. That makes complete sense and is easily seen in the relationship between prosperity and lack of corruption in government. The nations that are most prosperous and have the highest quality of life are those that have the lowest levels of corruption. Socrates and the ancient Greek philosophers said and wrote a great deal about this correlation. When a city or state is governed by good and just men the people and state will prosper. The laws will be just and will be upheld while the wealth and property of the common citizen will be protected. When the government is corrupt, however, the wealth of the state and that of every citizen is in danger of being stolen. When criminals take power the law is corrupted and the wealth of the state and people is plundered. This is, unfortunately, the true state of the union in the United States today. The Obama administration tells us that it will go to the end of the Earth to find the culprits of the Boston bombings while it has accepted for five years the blatant lies about the massive terror attacks of 9-11. The Obama administration has built its foreign policy and increased its trillion dollar war effort based on those outrageous lies. Will an administration that has willfully ignored the truth of the 9-11 terror attacks really investigate the attacks of 2013? What kind of terror cell is it that operates in Boston anyway? Can we expect the Obama administration to find the real culprits who are behind the terrorism? Keeping these basic truths in mind about terrorism and good government should help us to make sense of the developments of the Boston bombings and spate of terrorism that seems to be breaking out across the United States this cold and unfortunate April. Sources: "Boston Marathon victim Jeff Bauman helped identify bombers" by Damien McElroy, The Telegraph (UK), April 19, 2013 "Israeli doctors in Boston treated injured and suspects alike," Israel Hayom, April 21, 2013 “Officials: Boston suspect had no firearm when barrage of bullets hit hiding place” by Sari Horwitz and Peter Finn, Washington Post, April 25, 2013 “Remarks of Special Agent in Charge Richard DesLauriers at Press Conference on Bombing Investigation,” Holtville Tribune, April 17, 2013 "The FBI's Fake Terror Plots and 9-11" by Christopher Bollyn, December 5, 2011 "The Terror Drills That Became Real: 9/11, the London Bombings & the Sinking of Estonia" by Christopher Bollyn, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, 2012 "Toronto aunt of Boston bombing suspects receiving threats," Sun News (Toronto), April 21, 2013
Daryl Bradford Smith - The False Accusations of a Disinfo Agent
April 21, 2013 Well, here's a deal. And this is between you and me, because we've been doing this a long time together. You have to come out and, and slam Bollyn every way you can, in my, in support of me. Every way you can. No compromise.... You don't even know me man. You know something? Check my f--king criminal record. I'll grab you by the neck, Eric.
I received the following message from Vincent Gillespie on Sunday, April 21: Hi Chris, But that is not the main reason for this email. I just saw that on iamthewitness.com the following message: Christopher Bollyn has sent me and my wife a death threat, If you have any information to help with the investigation please contact me at Smith@Iamthewitness.com I would guess that others have probably already told you about this but in case you don't know about it I am letting you know. Best wishes, Vincent I had not heard about it and checked "The French Connection" website on April 21, but did not find the accusation. I did find it on the cached version of April 15. In this version Smith has added the words "or someone claiming to be him" to soften his very serious accusation:
Daryl Smith's accusation is preposterous but serious, which is why I am compelled to respond to it with this statement. It is utterly false. I have had no contact whatsoever with Daryl Smith since 2006 or early 2007. Smith, on the other hand, has spread vicious lies and slander about me since I met him in France in November 2005. I was aware that he had told blatant lies about me to people after that visit but put that matter aside when I was asked to speak on The French Connection's "radio show" with him and Eric Hufschmid to discuss my 9-11 research. I thought it was far more important to get the information out to the public than to hold a grudge against Smith for his slanderous comments. As I wrote in my December 2007 article about Smith's treachery, 'Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can' - Daryl B. Smith: After meeting Smith, I repeatedly warned Hufschmid that this person clearly could not be trusted. It was obvious. Shortly after that Thanksgiving 2005 visit, Smith was already spreading malicious slander about me to somebody in Canada. It was very clear that Smith had an agenda from the beginning -- to defame me and attack my credibility. I had no idea who he was working for, but he definitely was not a truth seeker and was clearly working against me. During the summer of 2007, Smith completely revealed himself as an agent and articulated that his mission was to defame me and destroy my credibility in any way he could. After he went on his vicious attack, he tried to get Eric Hufschmid to support him and join the defamation campaign against me. Hufschmid resisted. Eric recorded several of the phone calls in which Smith demanded that Hufschmid attack me. Smith made several clear threats on the life of Hufschmid and was evidently unaware that he was being recorded. One would think that the taped phone call in which Smith clearly threatens Hufschmid to "slam Bollyn every way you can" would have ended Smith's career in the 9-11 truth community, but it didn't. He is still at it because it is his job. He, like others, is paid to attack me. Because this may be a bit confusing, I will try to explain Smith's role as an agent. Smith came into the 9-11 truth movement in 2005, after someone cleared up his criminal charges for various narcotics offenses in Massachusetts or Rhode Island. He then started his website, The French Connection, and with it's online "radio show", Smith gained entrée into the 9-11 truth movement, especially among those circles that had read my material about Israeli involvement in the false-flag terror spectacle. Then, after having achieved some credibility among online listeners and readers, he tried to discredit me with vicious lies and slander. This is a well-known intelligence/progaganda tactic. Act like a mockingbird by imitating and copying the real source - and then turn against it and attack it. By having achieved some credibility and a following, the slander will be believed by some people and thus succeed in smearing the person being attacked. With others, the slanderous comments and character assassination will raise some doubts and suspicion about the person being targeted. Michael Piper from American Free Press does the exact same thing. It is precisely the use of this tactic by Smith and Piper that most clearly reveals that they are not working for the truth - but against it. Sources and Recommended Reading: "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can - Daryl B. Smith" by Christopher Bollyn, December 9, 2007 "Bollyn Responds to Malicious Slander of Daryl B. Smith," September 2007
Carlos Arredondo Describes the IED's at the Boston Marathon
April 16, 2013
Carlos Arredondo was an eyewitness to the terror bombing at the finish line of the Boston Marathon. The following interview of about 3 minutes is important to listen very closely to because Carlos clearly explains how the "I.E.D." (improvised explosive device) was designed to blast away from the fence and towards the spectators and the buildings - to maximize its killing effect. The flimsy wooden fencing was apparently not damaged and the people standing on the other side of the fencing, in the street, were barely affected except for the 78-year-old runner, Bill Iffrig, who collapsed due to the shock wave.
The fact that the bomb was evidently a sophisticated bomb that directed the blast in a certain direction indicates that the terrorists were experts at making terrorism devices. The question is, of course, who were the terrorism experts that carried out this evil terror spectacle?
Sources and Recommended Reading: “Hero of the Boston bombings: How father who lost his soldier son in Iraq saved lives after blasts rocked his home city,” Daily Mail (U.K.), April 16, 2013 “The Man in the Cowboy Hat: Meet Carlos Arredondo, a Hero of the Boston Bombings” by Tasneem Raja, Mother Jones, April 15, 2013 “The man in the hat at Boston Marathon finish line: Carlos Arredondo didn't set out to be hero” by John Newland, NBC News, April 16, 2013
The Dishonest Polls on Obama's Drone Killings
April 15, 2013 "O Man, who will discern in this work of mine the wonderful works of Nature, if you think it would be a criminal thing to destroy it, reflect how much more criminal it is to take the life of a man; and if this, his external form, appears to thee marvelously constructed, remember that it is nothing as compared with the soul that dwells in that structure; for that indeed, be it what it may, is a thing divine. Leave it then to dwell in His work at His good will and pleasure, and let not your rage or malice destroy a life – for indeed, he who does not value it, does not himself deserve it."
"These strikes are legal, they are ethical, and they are wise." Recent polls suggest that a majority of Americans support using remote-controlled aircraft to kill, without any indictment or due process, people in other nations who are “suspected terrorists.” A Gallup poll, for example, conducted on March 20-21, 2013, indicated that 65 percent of those polled agreed with the Obama administration’s policy of using drone missile strikes to kill “suspected terrorists” in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and wherever else they might be. A Fox News poll conducted in February 2013 found that “74 percent of voters approve of using drones to kill a suspected terrorist overseas.” The Fox News poll showed that a majority of 60 percent supported killing a U.S. citizen by drone if he were a “suspected terrorist” in a foreign country. The same poll found that 45 percent, nearly one in two, supported using drones to kill Americans in the United States – if they are identified as “suspected terrorists.” Are these polls believable?
WHO IS A "SUSPECTED TERRORIST?" While these polls are obviously meant to show that American public opinion supports the Obama administration’s morally unacceptable policy of using weaponized drones to carry out targeted killings, they have achieved these results in a fraudulent way: by using the emotionally laden term “suspected terrorist” without even defining what it means. Because “suspected terrorist” is clearly the phrase that elicited the positive response in these polls we should understand exactly what that means. The images of the terror attacks of 9-11 are what come to mind when most Americans are asked about terrorism, and most people would probably support killing the culprits behind those attacks. The pollsters who phrased the questions knew very well that most Americans would respond positively to a question about killing a “suspected terrorist.” But this loaded term does not even come close to describing the people who are being targeted and killed by U.S. drones in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen. The Israelis have long used the word “terrorist” to describe and delegitimize the actions of any Palestinian who resists the brutal Zionist occupation of Palestine. The U.S. has done the exact same thing since it began the “War on Terror” in the aftermath of 9-11. The United States is after all a foreign occupying power in Afghanistan and the Afghans do have the natural and legal right to use arms to resist that occupation. For its purposes the Pentagon considers “a terrorist” to be any person who engages in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. Using such a broad definition almost anyone in Afghanistan could be called “a suspected terrorist.” The U.S. military and media, however, seldom use the word “terrorist” to describe the victims of U.S. drone strikes. As a recent Columbia Law School report entitled “Counting Drone Strike Deaths” said: Reporting on drone strike casualties, and the tracking of those reports, typically divide the dead in two categories: “militants” and “civilians.” The hidden bias of this categorization stems from the ambiguity of the terms: they are not defined by the U.S. government, though U.S. officials use them; RULE OF LAW OR LAW OF THE JUNGLE? The polling results are disconnected from reality because many, if not most, of the people who have been killed by U.S. drone strikes are completely innocent civilians. The phrasing of the poll questions, however, suggests that the people being targeted by drones are all “suspected terrorists.” A more accurate and realistic question for the poll would be: Do you support the Obama administration's use of drones to kill people who may or may not be involved in hostilities against the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan? The drone killing question phrased in more neutral and honest language would, however, not have provided the pro-Obama results the pollsters were looking for. While some of those killed by drones may indeed be armed men this certainly does not mean they deserve to be killed. Killing people by drones is cold-blooded murder in which the victim’s life is taken with absolutely no due process or finding of guilt. Drone killings violate the most fundamental values of Western justice: the presumption of innocence and the writ of habeas corpus. The state, or in this case the president, has no right to take the life of any person who is not engaged in hostilities without due process and it is utterly unethical and morally repugnant to do so.
Sources and Recommended Reading: "Counting Drone Strike Deaths," Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic, October 2012 “Fox News Poll: Majority supports use of drones,” FoxNews.com, March 4, 2013 “In U.S., 65% Support Drone Attacks on Terrorists Abroad,” Gallup.com, March 25, 2013 “New Evidence That Team Obama Misled Us About the Drone War,” by Conor Friedersdorf, The Atlantic, April 10, 2013 “Obama’s drone war kills ‘others,’ not just al Qaida leaders” by Jonathan S. Landay, McClatchy Newspapers, April 9, 2013
Sen. McCain Pleads Ignorance of 9-11 Facts
April 13, 2013 On C-SPAN, Senator John McCain (R-AZ) claimed to be ignorant of the well-documented free-fall collapse of the 47-story WTC 7 building on 9-11. It is simply unacceptable for a U.S. senator like John McCain to plead ignorance about the essential facts of what happened on September 11, 2001.
John Kerry Asked About Demolition of WTC-7
April 9, 2013
John Kerry comments on the "controlled fashion" in which WTC 7 was brought down
NEW! Index to Solving 9-11
April 1, 2013 Note: For easy reference, print out a copy by clicking on http://www.bollyn.com/14019/ and selecting the printer friendly icon in the upper right-hand corner. Adjust to suit your needs and print. Index to Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World “60 Minutes”, 206
Kucinich on Accountability for Iraq War and Drone Killings
April 1, 2013 Right from the beginning it was very clear that there was no legitimate reason to go into Iraq... There has to be accountablilty in a democracy. It is widely understood today that war was based on lies... We need to clear the air in America. We need the truth.
U.S. Aid to Israel Doesn't Make Sense
March 28, 2013
American taxpayers have given more money to Israel than to any other nation, despite the fact that Israel is one of the smallest and richest countries on earth. Thanks to special interest lobbying, which, until now, has largely gone unopposed, Israel receives $3 billion American tax dollars each year. This comes to a whopping $8.2 million per day. But that is not all. Special arrangements that benefit Israel combined with aid paid out to other countries on its behalf cost Americans nearly $7 million more each day and thousands of jobs… The Staggering Cost of Israel to Americans Israel has a population of approximately 7.8 million… It is among the world's most affluent nations, with a per capita income similar to that of the European Union. Israel's unemployment rate of 5.6% - lower than America's 9.1%, and Israel's net trade, earnings, and payments is ranked 48th in the world while the United States sits at a dismal 198th. Yet Israel receives approximately 10% of America's foreign aid budget every year. The U.S. has, in fact, given more aid to Israel than it has to all the countries of sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean combined—which have a total population of over a billion people. And foreign aid is just one component of the staggering cost of our alliance with Israel. Read more from “The Staggering Cost of Israel to Americans” at: Sources: The Staggering Cost of Israel to Americans
The Last Letter
Updated March 26, 2013 The Last Letter: A Message to George W. Bush and Dick Cheney from a Dying Veteran To: George W. Bush and Dick Cheney From: Tomas Young
I write this letter on the 10th anniversary of the Iraq War on behalf of my fellow Iraq War veterans. I write this letter on behalf of the 4,488 soldiers and Marines who died in Iraq. I write this letter on behalf of the hundreds of thousands of veterans who have been wounded and on behalf of those whose wounds, physical and psychological, have destroyed their lives. I am one of those gravely wounded. I was paralyzed in an insurgent ambush in 2004 in Sadr City. My life is coming to an end. I am living under hospice care. I write this letter on behalf of husbands and wives who have lost spouses, on behalf of children who have lost a parent, on behalf of the fathers and mothers who have lost sons and daughters and on behalf of those who care for the many thousands of my fellow veterans who have brain injuries. I write this letter on behalf of those veterans whose trauma and self-revulsion for what they have witnessed, endured and done in Iraq have led to suicide and on behalf of the active-duty soldiers and Marines who commit, on average, a suicide a day. I write this letter on behalf of the some 1 million Iraqi dead and on behalf of the countless Iraqi wounded. I write this letter on behalf of us all—the human detritus your war has left behind, those who will spend their lives in unending pain and grief. I write this letter, my last letter, to you, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney. I write not because I think you grasp the terrible human and moral consequences of your lies, manipulation and thirst for wealth and power. I write this letter because, before my own death, I want to make it clear that I, and hundreds of thousands of my fellow veterans, along with millions of my fellow citizens, along with hundreds of millions more in Iraq and the Middle East, know fully who you are and what you have done. You may evade justice but in our eyes you are each guilty of egregious war crimes, of plunder and, finally, of murder, including the murder of thousands of young Americans—my fellow veterans—whose future you stole. Your positions of authority, your millions of dollars of personal wealth, your public relations consultants, your privilege and your power cannot mask the hollowness of your character. You sent us to fight and die in Iraq after you, Mr. Cheney, dodged the draft in Vietnam, and you, Mr. Bush, went AWOL from your National Guard unit. Your cowardice and selfishness were established decades ago. You were not willing to risk yourselves for our nation but you sent hundreds of thousands of young men and women to be sacrificed in a senseless war with no more thought than it takes to put out the garbage. I joined the Army two days after the 9/11 attacks. I joined the Army because our country had been attacked. I wanted to strike back at those who had killed some 3,000 of my fellow citizens. I did not join the Army to go to Iraq, a country that had no part in the September 2001 attacks and did not pose a threat to its neighbors, much less to the United States. I did not join the Army to “liberate” Iraqis or to shut down mythical weapons-of-mass-destruction facilities or to implant what you cynically called “democracy” in Baghdad and the Middle East. I did not join the Army to rebuild Iraq, which at the time you told us could be paid for by Iraq’s oil revenues. Instead, this war has cost the United States over $3 trillion. I especially did not join the Army to carry out pre-emptive war. Pre-emptive war is illegal under international law. And as a soldier in Iraq I was, I now know, abetting your idiocy and your crimes. The Iraq War is the largest strategic blunder in U.S. history. It obliterated the balance of power in the Middle East. It installed a corrupt and brutal pro-Iranian government in Baghdad, one cemented in power through the use of torture, death squads and terror. And it has left Iran as the dominant force in the region. On every level—moral, strategic, military and economic—Iraq was a failure. And it was you, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, who started this war. It is you who should pay the consequences. I would not be writing this letter if I had been wounded fighting in Afghanistan against those forces that carried out the attacks of 9/11. Had I been wounded there I would still be miserable because of my physical deterioration and imminent death, but I would at least have the comfort of knowing that my injuries were a consequence of my own decision to defend the country I love. I would not have to lie in my bed, my body filled with painkillers, my life ebbing away, and deal with the fact that hundreds of thousands of human beings, including children, including myself, were sacrificed by you for little more than the greed of oil companies, for your alliance with the oil sheiks in Saudi Arabia, and your insane visions of empire. I have, like many other disabled veterans, suffered from the inadequate and often inept care provided by the Veterans Administration. I have, like many other disabled veterans, come to realize that our mental and physical wounds are of no interest to you, perhaps of no interest to any politician. We were used. We were betrayed. And we have been abandoned. You, Mr. Bush, make much pretense of being a Christian. But isn’t lying a sin? Isn’t murder a sin? Aren’t theft and selfish ambition sins? I am not a Christian. But I believe in the Christian ideal. I believe that what you do to the least of your brothers you finally do to yourself, to your own soul. My day of reckoning is upon me. Yours will come. I hope you will be put on trial. But mostly I hope, for your sakes, that you find the moral courage to face what you have done to me and to many, many others who deserved to live. I hope that before your time on earth ends, as mine is now ending, you will find the strength of character to stand before the American public and the world, and in particular the Iraqi people, and beg for forgiveness. Sources and Recommended Reading and Viewing: “Wounded Iraq Vet Prepares to Die, Saying He's 'Ready to Go',” by Shushannah Walshe, ABC OTUS News, March 25, 2013 "Tomas Young and the End of the Body of War," Democracy Now, March 21, 2013 Body of War (film) a 2007 documentary following Tomas Young, an Iraq War veteran paralyzed from a bullet to the spine, on a physical and emotional journey as he adapts to his new body and begins to question the decision to go to war in Iraq. Directed by Ellen Spiro and Phil Donahue.
Goading Gullible America Into War
March 23, 2013 Although there were no "suicide bombers" in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem during President Obama's visit to Israel there were a couple unusual "missile attacks" and a terror bombing of a mosque in Syria, which may have been staged, i.e. false-flag attacks. There were two small missiles that are said to have been fired at Israel from Gaza and then there was an attack in Syria that is alleged to have involved a chemical weapon - a "red line" incident for the United States. Then there was the so-called "suicide bombing" at a Syrian mosque, which killed a senior cleric and supporter of the ruling regime. As we have clearly seen in Iraq and Vietnam, foreign military intelligence agencies are often the true culprits in such terror bombings.
The Syrian health ministry said 42 people died in the bombing and 84 were injured. The following report reveals that neither the culprits nor the cause of the blast are known: It is unclear if the explosion was caused by a car bomb or a mortar shell. It is important to keep in mind that some or all of these may have been false-flag attacks. The attack in Syria, for example, may have been carried out by Israel to give the impression that the Syrian government, or the rebels, are using chemical weapons. The result would be to draw the United States into the civil war in Syria. The United Nations is reported to be investigating the incident in Syria. Because there is so much deceit in such matters, and so much at stake, I recommend reading Pat Buchanan's latest article: Goading Gullible America Into War As President Obama departed for Israel, there came a startling report. Bashar Assad's regime had used poison gas on Syrian rebels. Two Israeli Cabinet members claimed credible evidence. Justice Minister Tzipi Livni said, "It's clear for us that (gas is) being used. ...This... should be on the table in the discussions." Yet, 72 hours later, the United States still cannot confirm that gas was used, and Syria and Russia have called on U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to investigate whether it was used, and if so, by whom. What's going on here? It does not require Inspector Clouseau to surmise this may be a fabrication to stampede the ever-gullible Americans into plunging into Syria to win the war for the al-Qaida-saturated Syrian rebels. But sucking America into Syria's civil war is only a near-term goal for the War Party, which is after larger game -- greasing the skids for a U.S. war on Iran. And lest we underestimate the War Party, the likelihood is they will get their war. For they have already gotten Obama to make concessions that are steering us inexorably toward such a war. First, Obama was persuaded to declare it U.S. policy that, where Iran's uranium-enrichment program is concerned, "All options are on the table!" Translation: Absent major concessions by Iran, proving she is not seeking a nuclear weapon, war against Iran is in the cards. Yet, even as Obama parrots the mantra, "All options are on the table," he has been persuaded to take off the table the option that won the Cold War, the George Kennan option of containment and deterrence. Obama has been goaded into proclaiming that though America contained an evil empire that spanned 13 time zones and possessed thousands of nukes, containment cannot work with Iran. Why not? Because the Ayatollah, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the mullahs, we are solemnly instructed, are religious fanatics who could easily opt for committing collective suicide should they get a bomb -- by using that bomb on us. This, of course, is to attribute to Iran's leaders an insanity they have never exhibited. Not in memory has Iran started a war. Saddam attacked Iran, not the other way around. When the Vincennes shot down an Iranian airliner, Ayatollah Khomeini himself ordered the Iraq war ended for fear America was about to intervene on Baghdad's side. Now we come to the sinister role of the U.S. Senate in setting the table for war. Consider what Senate Joint Resolution 65, crafted at AIPAC, the Israeli Lobby, and now being shopped around for signing by Sen. Lindsey Graham and Sen. Robert Menendez, does. SR 65 radically alters U.S. policy by declaring it to be "the policy of the United States...to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability and to take such action as may be necessary to implement this policy." Obama's policy -- no nuclear weapons in Iran -- is tossed out. Substituted for it in SR 65 is Bibi Netanyahu's policy -- "no nuclear weapons capability" in Iran. Now, as Iran already has that "capability" -- as does Germany, Japan, South Korea and other nations who have forsworn nuclear weapons -- what SR 65 does is authorize the United States to attack Iran -- to stop her from what she is doing now. Yet, according to all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, Iran does not have a nuclear bomb program. Critically, SR 65 goes further and "urges that if the Government of Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense, the United States Government should ... provide diplomatic, military and economic support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people and existence." Translation: Should Bibi attack Iran, the Senate urges the U.S. military to join in that attack. SR 65 is a blank check to Bibi to go to war with Iran, with a U.S. Senate commitment to join him. Coupled with House Resolution 850, which calls for crushing new sanctions, SR 65 is designed to so enrage and humiliate Iran that her delegates walk out of negotiations -- and war inevitably ensues. Here then is War Party calendar and countdown. First, rule out containment and deterrence of Iran, though that policy won the Cold War. Second, rule in a U.S. war on Iran if Tehran does not yield to all our demands in nuclear negotiations. Third, ensure the negotiations fail by repeated insults, threats, sanctions, and intolerable demands that so humiliate the Iranians that, enraged, they say "to hell with it" and walk out of the talks. Then, by default, the last "option" left for dealing with Iran--even if she still has not tested a bomb or enriched uranium to bomb grade -- will be U.S. air strikes on Fordow and Natanz, cheered on by a War Party that dreams of this day and that war. Preventing another generation of war dead delivered to Dover should be the first priority of American patriots.
Obama's Trip to Birthplace of "War on Terror"
March 19, 2013
President Obama's trip to Israel and Jerusalem will be his first visit as president to the birthplace of the Zionist deception known as the "War on Terror." While the Israelis are known to stage false-flag terror events to impress high-level foreign visitors, such an event seems rather unlikely during the upcoming Obama visit because the status quo is acceptable to the Israelis: the so-called peace process remains stuck in the deep freeze and Obama has done nothing to thaw it. The rapacious Israeli regime headed by Benjamin Netanyahu and Shimon Peres (born Szymon Perski in Wiszniew, Poland) continues to build illegal settlements on occupied territory while the Obama administration does nothing to stop it, so why use any fireworks? Simple Israeli logic. Today, the state of Israel is ruled by the same ruthless and violent terrorists who gave us 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror." Obama's visit to Israel is, therefore, the visit of the leader of a woefully deceived nation to the foreign power who imposed the evil deception upon it. Having lost an untold number of lives and having wasted trillions of dollars on illegal and unnecessary wars, the Israeli deception has cost America dearly. While most Americans saw the terror attacks of 9-11 as the beginning of the "War on Terror," the ideological framework of this Zionist fraud was actually born in Jerusalem during an international conference on terrorism held by the Jonathan [Netanyahu] Institute in early July 1979 - twenty-two years before the terror attacks that changed America. What is most important to note is that the same people who created the fraudulent "War on Terror" are currently running the state of Israel.
Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for example, was one of the founders of the Jonathan Institute, which hosted the conference, and his father, Benzion, was the institute's founding chairman. Benzion gave the opening speech and announced the purpose of the conference: This conference was called to serve as the beginning of a new process - the purpose of rallying the democracies of the world to a struggle against terrorism and the dangers it represents.
THE JERUSALEM CONNECTION "In the summer of 1979, a group of powerful and influential people joined to launch an international propaganda offensive to promote and exploit the issue of 'international terrorism'," Philip Paull of San Francisco State University wrote in his 1982 thesis on the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism. "The propaganda 'blitz' originated in Jerusalem. The conspiratorial network included present and former members of the Israeli and United States governments... "This 'anti-terrorist' propaganda campaign was and is being conducted in a style reminiscent of wartime 'psychological warfare' by journalists serving as conduits and spreaders of misinformation originating in Jerusalem," Paull wrote in his thesis, which I recently obtained a copy of. Paull's thesis from 1982 is important because it documents and validates my claim that the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" actually began in the late 1970s when Menachem Begin and his gang of Irgun terrorists came to power in Israel. 1979, the year of the Jerusalem conference, was the same year that Isser Harel, the founder of Israeli intelligence, told the American Zionist Michael D. Evans that Arab terrorists were planning to attack the tallest buildings in New York City. Harel's comments reveal that Israeli intelligence was already preparing the false-flag terrorism attacks that occurred at the World Trade Center in 1993 and 2001. As I point out in "The Architecture of Terror" in Solving 9-11, senior Mossad agents had obtained the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1987 for a company called Atwell Security of Tel Aviv. The Mossad had not gone to great lengths to obtain the security contract for the WTC and the Port Authority in order to prevent "Arab terrorists" from attacking the Twin Towers, but in order to make the attacks happen. The contract with Atwell Security was terminated in April 1987 when it was discovered that the company's president was a high-level Mossadnik criminal who was using an alias. Had the contract not been terminated, the terror attacks that destroyed the Twin Towers would probably have happened many years earlier. As Paull demonstrates in his thesis, "the entire notion of 'international terrorism' as promoted by the Jerusalem Conference rests on a faulty, dishonest, and ultimately corrupt information base." This is equally true of the official versions of the terror attacks of 1993 and 2001. They are nothing more than packs of lies designed to place the blame on Arabs and Muslims. The American people have been the primary target of the vicious 'psychological warfare' waged by the Israeli government. The purpose of the Israeli psychological warfare is to create fear through false-flag terrorism like 9-11 in order to impose the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror". I have done my utmost to provide an antidote to this fear and deception with my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World.
"The heightened global media coverage of 'international terrorism'", Paull wrote, "was for the most part a result of a deliberate, well-financed, international propaganda campaign initiated by the Israeli government." The theme of 'international terrorism' "was used to portray the 'Free World', including Israel, as essentially on the defensive before a virtual epidemic of terrorism which treatened the very fabric of civilization," Paull wrote. "But in order to transfigure 'international terrorism' into a political bubonic plague, it was necessary to produce false and misleading 'information', or misinformation." Paull's thesis explains how the Netanyahu institute and the Israeli government used misinformation to "deliberately exploit the emotions of fear and anxiety." After Benzion Netanyahu, the second speaker at the conference was Shimon Peres, who is currently the president of the state of Israel. Menachem Begin, the former terrorist head of the Irgun, was the final speaker on the first night of the 1979 conference. By using misinformation and lies to draw a connection between the Soviet Union and the Palestinian liberation movement (PLO), the wily Israelis sought to delegitimize the Palestinian resistance by deceiving the public. They had their American supporters among them; George H.W. Bush gave a speech during the closing session of the conference. The false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror", with its disastrous wars of aggression in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, and beyond, were conceived and created in Israel by the hard-line Likud terrorists who came to power under Menachem Begin in 1977. These are the people who hosted the Jerusalem conference in 1979. These same people and their sons and daughters control the state of Israel today. There is certainly not much to hope for from Obama's meeting with these ruthless criminal terrorists unless they are arrested and brought to justice. Unfortunately, that is probably not on Obama's agenda. Sources: International Terrorism: Challenge and Response, Benjamin Netanyahu, editor, Transaction Publishers, 1981 "International Terrorism": The Propaganda War, thesis written by Philip Paul for a Master of Arts in International Relations degree, San Francisco State University, May 1982
A Note of Thanks
October 24, 2012
I am grateful to all of those who have supported my efforts, especially those who helped me when I faced malicious prosecution at the hands of the corrupt police department of Hoffman Estates and the rigged courts of Cook County, Illinois. I am also very thankful to those who supported my work as I wrote, and finally published the Solving 9-11 books. Thanks to to G.S. and N.M. in Australia, J.B. and T.T. in Arkansas, E.E. in North Carolina, W.C., H.J., D.J., J.G., K.M., K.B., J.K., and D.L. in California, M.M., J.P., and G.P., in Illinois, J.L. and R.I. in Ohio, M.B. in New Mexico, T.R. in Connecticut, B.B. in Massachusetts, G.V. in Virginia, B.H. in Sweden, R.L. in Minnesota, J.A. in Michigan, E.H. in Canada, R.B. in Colorado, and A.H., E.S., J.L., and R.F. in New York for their support. Thank you.
I am grateful to D.K. in Canada, M.M. in Illinois, H.L. in New Jersey, a steadfast supporter in Japan, and D.L. in California for donating in November. Many thanks. Christopher -- thank you for all you did and all you gave of yourself to get the truth about 9-11 to the people. You never quit. Thank You. Thanks to D.L. in California, H.O. in Australia, and S.A. in Canada for supporting Bollyn.com in August. It's difficult to express the complete admiration and gratitude I have for the amount and quality of your work over the past decade. Your critical and enquiring attitude from the very beginning of the 9-11 tragedy is quite remarkable, and thank God, diligence and courage still inform your work today. Thanks to those who contributed to my work in April, especially T.S. in Oregon, R.W. in California, E.H. in Ontario, T.N. in Australia, N.S.A. in Illinois, S.H. in Virginia, G.S. in Australia, S.D. in Florida, M.B. in Albuquerque, J.R. in Illinois, M.C. in Bristol, T.N. in Australia, M.J. in Washington, J.K. in Kansas City, G.S. in Indiana, R.M. in Novato, A.S. in Texarkana, and M.L. in America. Thank you all very much!
"No English Queen has made more impact on the history of the nation than Anne Boleyn, and few have been so persistently maligned," Joanna Denny wrote in the opening of her excellent book, Anne Boleyn (2004).
Try me, good King, but let me have a Lawful Trial, and let not my sworn Enemies sit as my Accusers and Judges; yes, let me receive an open Trial, for my Truth shall fear no open shame; then shall you see, either mine Innocency cleared, your Suspicion and Conscience satisfied, the Ignominy and Slander of the World stopped, or my Guilt openly declared.
Sincere thanks for the donations received in February, especially from V.M. in Canada, J.A. in Kuwait, R.L. in New Zealand, R.D. in Michigan, E.H. in Ontario, T.B. in Saskatchewan, S.Ö. in Sweden, P.C. in Tokyo, S.C. in Tucson, P.D. in Washington, D.C., A.G. in New Jersey, D.A. in Toronto, T.M. in Louisiana, S.R. in Illinois, W.R. in Denver, and M.K. in Hoffman Estates.
Many thanks to those who donated in January: E.H. in Ontario, L.L. in New Mexico, S.K. in Illinois, J.S. in New Zealand, M.B. in Albuquerque, N.M. in Nova Scotia, B.B. in Cambridge, M.P. in Connecticut, J.P. in Cicero, J.W. in Cincinnati, and A.S. in Palm Desert. Mr. Bollyn: All the best... I also received this very nice Christmas greeting: I wish to add some brief words of encouragement for the marvelous work you have undertaken on behalf of all of us who value our freedom. Thank you for your courage, your integrity and your amazing tenacity in exposing the evil which is gripping our planet.
At times our own light goes out and is rekindled by a spark from another person. Each of us has cause to think with deep gratitude of those who have lighted the flame within us. I am very grateful to those who have donated in support of my work in December, especially S.C. in Missouri, A.S. in Panama, G.S. in Australia, T.B. in Saskatchewan, N.R. in New York, E.H. in Canada, P.C. in Japan, J.S. in California, A.S. in London, G.S. in Indiana, M.L. in Maryland, J.B. in Arkansas, S.D. in Aberdeenshire, J.L. in Sacramento, J.R. in Illinois, and T.M. in Germany. Many thanks to you all and those who supported my work in 2009. I couldn't do it without your help. I received this encouraging note from a new supporter: I would like to thank YOU for your brave and continuous effort to bring the painful truth to light. I admire your tireless research and linguistic intelligence. I shared with my husband the other day, that you are the only person out there who writes and explains the tragic 9/11 events so cohesively with plenty of scientific evidence and ‘to the point’, that it will be hard for anyone to dismiss it as yet another conspiracy theory. Don't worry, I won't give up. It is always nice to hear from supporters. We are all in this together and it really is a collective effort to find the truth and save our nation(s). And a big thanks to those who donated in October, especially J.F. in Colorado, K.D. in New York, T.B. in Saskatchewan, D.G. in Connecticut, V.C. in Ireland, E.H. in Canada, A.S. in Scotland, J.M. in Illinois, R.A. in Philadelphia, and G.S. in Australia. My sincere thanks to you all. Your support is greatly appreciated. In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it—and the glow from that fire can truly light the world. And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man. This note of appreciation came from a supporter in Canada: ... from a reader in France: Thanks for your brave investigations to bring light on Truth. You stand out among the best. Many thanks for your contributations to a Cassandra-like society...It is thanks to the likes of you et al that one learns of the manipulation/control of society. May you be protected by the good (especially in the security service). At a time of Depression, which affects all the good (and the stupid), I admire your intelligence in assessing the current debacle. I am heartened that sincere people consider my work "honorable" and donate to support my efforts. I am very grateful for those who supported my 9-11 research in the month of September, especially D.A. in Toronto, G.W. in Germany, D.M., H.M., and K.B. in California, R.L. in Minnesota, J.A. in Michigan, R.W. in Arizona, K.M. in Australia, M.B. in New Mexico, D.M. in Denver, T.N. in Australia, S.M. in Omaha, M.P., J.A., R.H., and E.H. in Canada, J.D. in England, J.S. in San Marcos, W.F. in New York, J.C. in Long Beach, P.C. in Tokyo, W.H. in The Netherlands, M.P. in Connecticut, D.B. in Wyoming, J.D. in Illinois, J.H. in Quebec, J.M. in Oregon, G.S. in Queensland, L.B. in Tucson, E.J. in Chicago, E.B. in Palm Springs, J.B. in Arkansas, and M.S. in Louisiana. Thank you all very much. Feeling gratitude and not expressing it is like wrapping a present and not giving it. These kind words of encouragement came with a generous donation: There is no better place that I can place my money than with you. Dollars become credible currency when placed in your hands. Please keep up the fine, fine work, and accept my gratitude for your devotion to this supremely important part of our lives. Your efforts are unique and singular. A reader in South Africa sent this note after reading the first 12 chapters of my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World: I have just read the 12 chapters of your 9-11 book. I am gobsmacked! Your research is overwhelmingly precise and alarmingly accurate. It took me four days, (with research) and even though I am well researched on the Zionazis, I was flabbergasted at the attention to detail so far. We, as inhabitants of this planet, will be forever grateful for your time and dedication to this cause, and, in time, will owe you a huge debt of gratitude in the future. Thank you for your incredible work. A supporter in Hawaii sent me this nice note: Aloha, Chris,
The Boleyns and the English Bible
The Boleyns and the English Bible Wherefore I do beseech you all, for the love of our Lord God, that you do at all seasons hold by the truth, and speak it, and embrace it.
Today, the Bible is the most popular book in the English language. When we read the Holy Scripture or hear it read in church we treat it with reverence, but it has not always been that way. In the 1520s, hundreds of Bibles, the first copies printed in English, were burned by the Roman Catholic Bishop of London.
In 1536, William Tyndale, the Roman Catholic priest who translated the Bible from Greek and Hebrew, was strangled and burned at the stake near Brussels. Branded a heretic and hounded by agents of Rome, Tyndale lived and worked on the English Bible in exile in Antwerp, Marburg, and Worms for the last 12 years of his life. His New Testament, translated directly from Greek, was first published in Worms in 1526.
"While William Tyndale was praying in his dying moments that God would open the eyes of the King of England, God had already answered the prayer in his own way: he had used a woman to influence the King and the nation with the gospel of salvation through Jesus Christ. That woman was Anne Boleyn," wrote Kath Dredge in Anne Boleyn: One Short Life that Changed the English-speaking World by Colin Hamer. The four-hundred year old King James Bible that we use today is essentially the Tyndale translation, which is the basis for about 85 percent of the King James Version of 1611. The Tyndale Bible allowed the people to read the Scriptures in English for the first time. The first book of Holy Scripture printed in England was a copy of Tyndale’s New Testament, printed on vellum and presented to Anne Boleyn, the Queen of England, in 1536. Anne already had a personal copy from the Antwerp printing in 1534, which she openly displayed - although it was a banned book.  "The Newe Testament, dylygently corrected and compared with the Greke by Willyan Tindale. Antwerp, 1534." Anne Boleyn's personal copy of Tyndale's New Testament, with her coat of arms at the bottom. The Boleyn family had been instrumental in bringing the Scripture to the people in the English language. “Promoting the vernacular Bible was clearly a Boleyn family enterprise,” Eric Ives writes in The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn. To understand how revolutionary the English Bible was in the 1530s we need to consider that for seven centuries after the conversion of England to Christianity (in the Third Century), the common man had no access to the text of the Scriptures. It was not until 1538, when Henry VIII commanded the clergy to install the Great Bible in a convenient place in every parish church that the common people were able to read the Bible in English.  The Gospel of John translated by William Tyndale In Catholic England the Scriptures were in Latin, often read by priests who understood very little of the text. The Church of Rome wielded immense political power and owned one-third of the kingdom. Keeping the Holy Scriptures out of the hands of the people was essential for the Church to maintain its power over the people and their king. Anne Boleyn, the second wife of King Henry VIII, was dedicated to liberating England from the clutches of the Church of Rome, a mission for which she paid the ultimate price. In "George Boleyn, Religion and the Reformation," Claire Ridgway points out that the Boleyns were "reformist Catholics": Until Henry VIII broke with the Church of Rome, England was a devoutly Roman Catholic country. Henry himself was fervently Catholic and, until his desire for a divorce led him to a break with Rome, he actively persecuted religious reformists. This led to the Pope giving him the title, ‘Defender of the Faith’, a title he was immensely proud of. Despite Henry’s active persecution of those who failed to conform to the orthodox Catholic faith, Thomas Boleyn favoured reform of the church, as did his youngest two children. It was their religious idealism which bred in zealous Catholics a hatred of them which continued long after their deaths, and which spawned many of the rumours, innuendos and slanders against them that persist to this day. Reform amounted to a desire to rid the church of increasing greed and corruption, for the rites of the faith to be reformed, and for the word of God to be accessible to the masses. George and Anne Boleyn were not only devotees of this idealism; in time they came to embody it...They sought reform of the Catholic religion, not a complete departure from it, and both of them died as Catholics. They obviously supported a break with Rome because that was essential in order for Anne to become Queen, but their passion for reform did not mean that they altered their basic religious beliefs, and for them, the break also meant that the reforms which they envisioned could be brought to fruition. They died as reformist Catholics, not as Protestants. Anne and her brother George were beheaded in May 1536. George Boleyn, a close advisor of King Henry VIII, said these last words before he was killed: Truly so that the Word should be among the people of the realm I took upon myself great labour to urge the king to permit the printing of the Scriptures to go unimpeded among the commons of the realm in their own language. And truly to God I was one of those who did most to procure the matter to place the Word of God among the people because of the love and affection which I bear for the Gospel and the truth of Christ’s words. - George Boleyn’s scaffold speech, 17 May 1536  Anne Boleyn in the Tower by Edouard Gibot (1835) "True religion in England had its commencement and its end with your mother." - Alexander Ales to Elizabeth I from 'A brief treatise or cronikelle of the most vertuous Ladye Anne Bulleyne, late Queen of England' by William Latimer. Sources and Recommended Reading: Hamer, Colin, Anne Boleyn: One Short Life that Changed the English-speaking World, Day One Publications, Leominster, U.K., 2007 http://www.dayonebookstore.com/index.php?_a=viewProd&productId=4172 “Biblical Literature”, The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, University of Chicago, 1974 Chambers Biographical Dictionary, edited by Una McGovern, Edinburgh, Chambers Harrap Publishers Ltd., 2003 Denny, Joanna, Anne Boleyn: A New Life of England’s Tragic Queen, Da Capo Press 2007 Ives, Eric, The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn, Blackwell Publishing 2005 Ridgway, Claire, "George Boleyn, Religion and the Reformation", TheAnneBoleynFiles.com, 16 April 2010 http://www.theanneboleynfiles.com/george-boleyn-religion-and-the-reformation/5115/
|
