|
|
|
|
|
Home
Question and Answer Forum
Question and Answer ForumMarch 10, 2012 Because so many good comments and questions come to Bollyn.com through Feedback I created this Q&A forum. The latest comments and questions come first. The person who asked about the "Ground Zero" Islamic center "controversy" in New York City sent this kind comment: Thank you very much for your excellent answer. But then, everything you have written is excellent and well researched. You are a real hero and an example of courage and honesty. Latest Question: For quite a few years I've been wondering how we will ever be successful in exposing these potent truths that would so much move our world in a positive direction - exposing once and for all the tragic use of false false terror. I would love to see the movement address this question of how are we going to achieve a this much needed breakthrough. It seems like while the case to disprove the official story gets more solid the 9/11 Truth movement as a whole is declining. Bollyn Responds: This is probably the most commonly asked question about 9-11, and happens to be a very timely one in light of the recently released Pentagon report about the Air Force mortuary at Dover AFB where, it turns out, unidentified human remains from Shanksville and the Pentagon wound up being disposed of in a landfill. I have written about the deception that evidently occurred at Shanksville in an article entitled The Shanksville Deception of 9-11. Although I cannot say for certain what happened to the passengers and crews from the Boston flights of 9-11, I can say what I think may have happened based on the evidence. Wallace Miller, the coroner of Somerset County, is protesting the Pentagon report that says that human remains from Shanksville were taken to Dover AFB. He also claims that all the remains from Flight 93 were identified. This can only be explained by the fact that Miller was not part of the recovery effort from the large debris field that was about 100 meters in the woods. Miller had previously told the press that he stopped being a coroner after about 20 minutes at the crater in the reclaimed mine because there were no body parts to be seen. This is probably true because it was from the large debris field around the cabin of Barry Hoover that the human remains that were taken to Dover AFB were found. Now, ask yourself, why would the FBI not allow the local coroner, who had legal responsibility for the crime scene, to be part of the recovery effort from the debris field? What was in the debris field that had to be hidden from the county coroner? The local coroner and other authorities were probably kept away from the real debris field because the number of individuals on the plane that was evidently shot down over Shanksville is much larger than the 44 who are said to have been on Flight 93. The local coroner could simply not be allowed to see the real debris field. I think what may have happened was a sleight-of-hand trick in which the Boston passengers were put together on another flight out of Boston that landed at Cleveland airport, as Flight 93 reportedly did. These people were then put on the plane that was shot down over Shanksville. This would explain the unidentified human remains from Shanksville and why the real debris field in the woods was kept secret. To understand the details of the 9-11 deception at Shanksville, I recommend reading my articles: The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93, Was Flight 93 Shot Down?, Eyewitnesses Saw Military Aircraft at Scene of Flight 93, and The Shanksville Deception of 9-11. Question: What are the characteristics of a False Front?
The same holds true for all such operations, such as false front nationalist, patriotic, or radical websites and publications. If the people who run the operation do not seem like they fit, it may be that the operation is a false front scam. Question: What is your take on Israel and Iran? I think it is all bluster from all sides to stir up support at home. I can't see them really starting a pre-emptive war in an election year. I can't see the U.S. military going willingly into that hornet's nest.
The fact of the matter is that the war against Iran is already underway. The punitive sanctions against Iran, dictated by the Zionist war lobby, are a tactic of economic warfare. The Zionist establishment has been pushing hard for war with Iran for several years. The anti-Iranian sanctions and propaganda are very similar to what organized Jewry did when it declared war on Germany in 1933. Although it took 6 more years for the war to begin, it finally came to all-out war with millions killed and much of Europe destroyed. The noble lie is anything but noble. The idea is mostly associated with government, for good reason. Government lies to us to manipulate public opinion to bring about certain results, like war and wealth redistribution. Comment: People like you and I are working towards fixing serious problems. A lot of the people who have caused these problems are being compensated via taxpayers' funds. So how much more do people like you and I deserve to be compensated for exposing these problems so that they can be solved? Bollyn Responds: This is an excellent comment because it goes directly to the question of what is the value of the truth in an era of lies? Should one even expect any compensation for bringing the truth to the public? I can report that during the fall of 2011, the 10th anniversary of 9/11, donations from readers averaged less than $10 per day. Obviously, if Bollyn.com were a business I would have had to close up shop a long time ago. I cover the bulk of my costs and maintain my website out of my own pocket and have done so for years. Bollyn.com is not a business, but a mission. I cannot be indifferent to the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 that resulted in the mass murder of thousands of my fellow citizens. I cannot abide wars of aggression and conquest based on these lies. I do what I can to bring the truth out in order to liberate my nation from the twin yoke of deception and slavery. When you see a well-funded website that claims to be giving you the truth, ask yourself how is it funded, and by whom? Is there any transparency in the financing of the operation? I am a one-man operation and I am fortunate to have the support of a few concerned and generous citizens. I am motivated to maintain Bollyn.com solely by my desire to see truth and justice prevail. I will continue my work as long as I can -- and so long as God wills it. Comment: It was so nice to log on to your page and see a call for paper ballots. I've been saying it ever since 2004, and to be honest, never gave it thought before that - I thought the hanging chad thing was a bit foolish, and I was glad, at that time, that Bush was elected since Gore was ready to slam Kyoto down our throats. But with the exit polls at 2004 being so far off, I knew that the machines were rigged, and having done a little programming myself, I could understand how easy it would be to hijack votes on a touchscreen voting system. So yes, to get back to government of, for, and by [the people], we definitely need to return to accountable balloting. Let's pray it makes some inroads in the psyche of the under-educated in this country.
I point this out because it is important to understand that the Zionist criminal network in the United States works hand-in-glove with the Israelis and has done so since the 1940s - before the creation of the State of Israel. When I say Zionist criminal network I am not using hyperbole. I am referring to the Jewish Zionist gangsters who have long controlled whole sections of the U.S. economy, such as the media, Hollywood, New York City and Washington, D.C. The Israelis usually handle the operations side while the American Zionists act as financiers and front men, as Pipes does in MEF. This is the same combination that carried out 9/11. Question: "Aren't you going to print your book on 9/11?" a supporter asked the other day.
The letter from the reader begins... Bollyn Responds: I have written a series of articles about the serious health damage caused by exposure to depleted uranium. The whole series of six articles based on original research can be read here: http://www.bollyn.com/depleted-uranium
Bollyn Responds: The Perry piece, “The U.S. Must Support Israel at the U.N.” was actually published the previous day in the Jerusalem Post under the rubric, “Comment: The Palestinians’ illegitimate UN gambit” on 15 September 2011.
In the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, the Rothschilds made a high art out of deliberately provoking wars and revolutions. This furthered the Jewish Messianic goal of destroying the Gentile nations and supplanting them with universal Jewish rule. It also enabled the Rothschilds to further the Jewish Messianic goal of concentrating the wealth of the world in Jewish hands. By the 1870s, the Rothschilds had accumulated at least $3,400,000,000.00. [USD non-adjusted] Question: There is a Toronto Hearing on 9/11 being held very shortly. Presumably this represents the key figures regarding 9/11 (see http://torontohearings.org/). I am wondering if you are participating, and what your standing is with them? Are you completely ostracized by the "mainstream" 911rs? Bollyn Responds: Yes, I am aware of the Toronto Hearings conference about 9/11. I was not invited, which is not unusual. My analysis of Israeli involvement in 9/11 is strictly taboo in such forums. Canada is, after all, a partner in the War on Terrorism.
Bollyn Responds: Kevin, why do you use a question mark? Murdoch is obviously "the key figure" in spreading the 9/11 deception propaganda to the public. The current Murdoch scandal about phone hacking is just the tip of the iceberg, of course. When Ed Miliband of the Labour Party calls for the break-up of News Corp., you know there are much bigger fish to be fried. Rupert Murdoch has evidently served his purpose - the global deception of 9/11 - but his son of an Estonian mother will certainly not do for the Zionist masters behind Murdoch. This is exactly what I had in mind when I wrote this last year: Bollyn Responds: I am very glad to hear from the relatives and families of the 9/11 victims. The 9/11 relatives have certainly been treated extremely badly in the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein and there is only one family left in the litigation process -- although there has been no 9/11 trial after nearly 10 years! I have done what I could to help the relatives by showing them the prejudice and conflict of interest that exists in the Zionist-controlled court of Judge Hellerstein. As one might have expected from a judge who is a Zionist partisan, the key Israeli Mossad defendant, International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS NV), has been excused from the tort litigation. This is the Israeli "airport security" company that controlled passenger screening operations at Boston's Logan Airport -- and while they are responsible for allegedly allowing knife-wielding terrorists onto the planes on 9/11, they have been excused. Go figure.
Hightower's Message to Bollyn News Report of 9/11 by: 9News Staff Hightower confirmed that his father, William Donald Hightower worked at Ames from 1963 through 1988. If I consider his "nanothermite challenge" worth discussing, I will do so on another page.
When John F. Kennedy, Jr. and his girlfriend died in the plane crash, JFK, Jr was also buried at sea by the U.S. military. I don't remember the media ever explaining why the U.S. Navy would bury JFK, Jr. at sea because JFK, Jr. wasn't a military or government official. I don't know if the Kennedy family asked for JFK, Jr. to be buried at sea. Question: "[Robert A.] Kelman was general manager of Hugo Neu, the company who managed the destruction of 250,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center by sending it to Asian smelters." Thank you for your article, especially your focus on the removal of steel evidence. One point I have never seen mentioned is that these tons of materials were shipped out within a few weeks of 9/11. Shipping this huge amount of steel would take months of planning - transporting it from the WTC site to ships, reserving the ships, setting up receiving stations in Asia, etc. How was this gargantuan task accomplished so quickly? I hope your book covers this; no one has researched this aspect of the hoax.
Bollyn Responds: Thank you for this link. I don't know if the Stuxnet worm played a role in the nuclear disaster in Japan, but I do believe that Stuxnet is very similar to the malicious code (see Ptech, etc.) that infected and affected the efficiency of critical U.S. computer systems on 9/11. Stuxnet has been described as having been able to make the Iranian centrifuges run amok while the computer monitors indicated that all was well. This is exactly the kind of deception that happened on 9/11 when critical NORAD and FAA computer systems failed to notice the errant aircraft and respond properly to the threats. In a 15 January 2011 article entitled "Israeli Test on Worm Called Crucial in Iran Nuclear Delay" the New York Times reported that Stuxnet was tested at the Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona in the Negev. The paper reported that Israel had built an elaborate test facility at their secret and illegal nuclear weapons site that contained a replica array of the Iranian uranium enrichment plant, adding that such a test site would have been necessary for the design of the attack software. Richard Falkenrath, a principal at the Chertoff Group (headed by the high-level Israeli agent Michael Chertoff), actually appeared on Bloomberg television saying that he believed that Israel was behind Stuxnet. It should be noted that there was a very similar, but less well known computer crime involved in the 9/11 terror attacks, in which the Mossad and the Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona were also involved. To understand how Israeli intelligence was able to gain control of the U.S. military computer systems I recommend reading my chapter on "The Architecture of Terror", especially the part about the Israeli Amit Yoran, the former cyber-security czar of the Pentagon. The "rebellion" is the result of the global elites harnessing the Libyan inter tribal East/West dissension for their own agenda. The long term goal is likely the Islamisation of the Middle East and North Africa to present the Israel/US/EU axis powers with a strong enemy to justify homeland oppression. Question from U.S.A. - I was just reading your articles on Libya. I was absolutely sad as can be today, could not stop crying since I know that innocent men, women, children and babies will be murdered by the attack, not to mention the DU [depleted uranium] that will contaminate the air, water, and soil in Libya forever.
This is why I am not optimistic that there will be an investigation of 9/11 in the United States anytime soon. It would probably require a real revolution to oust the financial regime behind the government before the U.S. government would be able to really investigate and expose what happened on 9/11. This is not to say that we will not know who was behind 9/11, only that the truth will not be accepted by those in power. To understand why it is so difficult for 9/11 truth seekers to investigate and prosecute the real criminals behind the false-flag terrorism we need to understand that this is an asymetrical struggle between individual truth seekers and very powerful non-democratic institutions. The main institutions that are opposed to 9/11 truth are Zionist-controlled entities such as the Anti-Defamation League (and its parent organization of Jewish Freemasons - the B'nai B'rith), the State of Israel (and its military intelligence agencies), the New York Times, CNN, the BBC, the Department of Justice (and F.B.I.), the C.I.A., and the President of the United States, to name but a few.
I grew up in Norman Rockwell's America with a strong belief in our inalienable rights and the freedom of speech, a freedom I was known to exercise frequently. My 9/11 research and journalism are a result of my belief as an American that I have the right to express my thoughts without fear of reprisal. The brutal assault I suffered by undercover police at my home in August 2006 and the malicious prosecution that followed showed me that there are corrupt officials in my hometown (virtually all of them) that were willing to violate my constitutional rights (a federal crime) and commit perjury in court in order to play their role in a conspiracy to try to silence me. As a consequence, I lost my job as a journalist and we had to leave our home but I have not lost my belief in the freedom of speech. I know that the truth will prevail and in time we will know who committed the false-flag terrorism of 9/11. We will see that those who attacked me and tortured me with a TASER as they broke my arm in front of my wife and 8-year-old daughter were actually taking orders and committing crimes for those who are behind the 9/11 cover up. Question: I am sure you know this creep Mike Harari (who is said to be behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11). But what do you make of this from Veterans Today? Dimitri Khalezov...has revealed from first-hand knowledge that Mike Harari organized the 9-11 massacre...His explanation is devastating in its simplicity. The conversion of three steel-built skyscrapers to fine powder is only possible with nuclear explosions underneath them. Thermite, nano-thermite and thermate may well have been used by the killers to cut beams and girders but they would not have turned concrete to powder, or steel for that matter. Bollyn Responds: Mike Harari is certainly in that group of senior Mossad terrorists who are involved as high-level managers of the 9/11 attacks. This is the group of Israelis that was involved in Iran-Contra and drug smuggling operations from the 1970s. This is the link to the Bush and Clinton families, and why Marc Rich was involved in the destruction of the steel from the WTC. Question: I was curious to know if you have completed the final chapter in your 9/11 book? It is a fantastic read. Hope all is well.
One of the Polish Jews who tortured and killed hundreds of innocent Germans was Solomon "Shlomo" Morel, who has lived in Israel since 1993 to avoid prosecution for war crimes. The following extract is from Solomon Morel: A Jewish Death Camp Commandant in Stalinist Poland
"Morel brought Jewish and Polish guards -- sometimes drunken -- into barrack 7 of accused Nazis or Hitler youth. It was called either the Deutsches Haus or the “brown barracks.” Morel had them sing Nazi songs and then he began to beat them. Depending upon his mood, he would use his bare hands, a wooden stool, a pistol butt or a truncheon. The guards beat the Germans with clubs. Morel asked, “How many blows do you want?” If the answer was unsatisfactory, it was fifty blows. It was reported that the “ritual of the organized tormenting of prisoners took place virtually every night…” When using the wooden stool, Morel would beat prisoners until the stool broke apart. The corpses were left on the floor. At dawn, they were taken in a horse-drawn cart to a cemetery by the Rawa river where they were dumped into a mass grave." Question: If the Jews can create such a complex matrix then they must be really very smart. It would, of course, require lots of brains apart from lots of money to pull off such a veil [of deception] over the whole world. But is it also because they (the orthodox Zionist Jews) have a complete lack of ethics? By the way, I’m a Hindu from India and I don't think ALL JEWS are bad.
The photo of the three men who manage the Obama administration huddled around the president's desk says a great deal about the powers that control the Obama White House. Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is an Israeli national whose father is a former Zionist terrorist in the Irgun. David Axelrod is the son of a Jewish communist writer who wrote for a magazine that was designed to push the United States into war against Germany. The third man at the desk is Philip Michael Schiliro, the president's assistant on legislation and the key person in getting Democrats in Congress to support the huge bailout bill that was passed in the beginning of the Obama administration.
Phil Schiliro is a very interesting name in Obama's administration, the current government of the Zionist crimocracy that rules the United States. The Schiliro clan is a family that has a long history of involvement in organized crime. One member of the family, Lewis Dennis Schiliro, actually ran the FBI office in New York City during the 1990s - overseeing such key investigations as the first bombing of the World Trade Center, other terrorism and financial crime cases, TWA Flight 800, Egypt Air 990, etc. Another member of the family, 30-year-old Joseph Schiliro from East Meadow, Long Island, was busted in January 2010 for being part of a network of drug dealers that dealt $1 million of "Special-K" (Ketamine, an animal tranquilizer) every month. Are these Schiliros all related? I would venture to guess that they are.
Lewis Dennis Schiliro and Phil Schiliro grew up on the same part of Long Island, East Meadow and Baldwin respectively (5 miles apart from each other), and both have mothers named Jean and fathers named Joseph. I have not yet determined if they are related, but I suspect they are. There were, after all, only 55 people named Schiliro in the United States in 1930 and most of them were directly related to each other. This is a very important question because Lewis Schiliro became a senior vice president at Maurice Greenberg's A.I.G. insurance shortly after he left the FBI in 2000 and Phil Schiliro was instrumental in getting Congress to pass the legislation that provided hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to bailout criminal banks and enterprises like A.I.G. - the largest direct recipient of the bailout. Furthermore, the FBI is the most important part of the 9/11 cover-up and Lewis Schiliro has actively contributed to that effort. In the New Year I will return to the Schiliro connection to 9/11 and the bailout of A.I.G. Now back to the question at hand: If the Jews can create such a complex matrix then they must be really very smart. It would, of course, require lots of brains apart from lots of money to pull off such a veil [of deception] over the whole world. But is it also because they (the orthodox Zionist Jews) have a complete lack of ethics? The discussion of this photo and the men who manage the Obama White House is not a digression, but is meant to serve as an illustration to help understand my response to this question. Americans in the 21st Century are not very political nor are they politically organized in any meaningful way. Millions of Americans voted for Barack Obama simply because he symbolized "change", which most people thought was a good idea. They thought he was a black man from Chicago, although he is not from Chicago and he is as much white as he is black. Most people do not look any deeper than the images they see on television. Very few are aware of the fact that Obama is a Zionist-controlled puppet, a modern-day "golem", whose only agenda is to fulfill the wishes of his Jewish Zionist masters.
Jews are certainly as smart and as wealthy as any other ethnic group but these are not the only things that make up Jewish political power. The real essence of Jewish political power is that they operate as a collective, which is to say that they work together as an organized team. Wealthy Jews like the Rothschilds create and finance Zionist organizations - including secret societies - to increase their power and control. Zionist Jews have a virtual monopoly over the U.S. media. Jews dominate the political parties and media in the United States - including third party movements and alternative media outlets. Ownership of the media and Zionist secret societies like the International Order of B'nai B'rith are huge force multipliers for Zionist Jews. No other ethnic group in the United States operates as a collective as effectively as the Jews. In a nation of politically unorganized people, a well-organized and well-financed collective force (with powerful secret societies) like the Zionist Jews can slice its way through like a warm knife going through butter. It's that simple, but there is much more. As a student of Middle Eastern history and U.S. politics, I have pondered this question for many years, as have many others before me. To understand the Jewish posture vis-a-vis the rest of the world I suggest reading how Tacitus and Gibbon, two classical historians, described the hostility of the "unsocial" Jewish religion and how Jews regard the rest of mankind: Moses, wishing to secure for the future his authority over the nation, gave them a novel form of worship, opposed to all that is practiced by other men. Things sacred with us, with them have no sanctity, while they allow what with us is forbidden…This worship, however introduced, is upheld by its antiquity; all their other customs, which are at once perverse and disgusting, owe their strength to their very badness. The most degraded out of other races, scorning their national beliefs, brought to them their contributions and presents. This augmented the wealth of the Jews, as also did the fact, that among themselves they are inflexibly honest and ever ready to shew compassion, though they regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies. The Roman historian Tacitus said the Jews "regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies" and Edward Gibbon (who called their religion "unsocial") said they are "a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind." The hostility that orthodox Jews harbor for non-Jews is key to understanding the Jewish predicament: the Jews see themselves as a people apart from others, a separate nation, and their first loyalty and obligation is to their tribe. Orthodox Jews are raised with the idea that Jews are superior to other people. This sense of Jewish supremacism and hostility toward other people is the reason the Jewish religion is seen as unsocial by Gibbon and others. Like Hinduism, the Jewish religion is a set of rules of conduct for a specific ethnic group. Christianity and Islam, on the other hand, are faith-based universal religions which embrace all of mankind.
Question: I have received two questions about Mark Lane and American Free Press (AFP). Since they both pertain to the Liberty Lobby and its publications, I will answer them together: Question No. 1 - Subject: Mark Lane: CIA agent I'm familiar with these charges by Bollyn. His problem is that Lane has been proven correct about Lee Oswald and if Piper indeed works for Lane, then how does Bollyn explain the most important book on the JFK killing, Final Judgment, which is the only book to nail the Israelis for being part of the assassination? That's where Bollyn's thesis falls down. My main problem with Lane is with his presence at Jonestown, but I have read nothing definitive about it other than his being the lawyer for Jones. Lane's probably lucky he wasn't killed, too, which is why I suppose he disappeared for a while. I suspect it was a CIA mass murder of an experimental population. I'm not ready to accept Bollyn's version without more than just his being a Jewish lawyer who successfully defended Liberty Lobby from a CIA lawsuit, which is not a bad thing. Question No. 2 – From an AFP insider named George K. I am working now at the AFP office and keep bumping onto all kinds of unreasonable hysteria around...Paul (Tudor) Angel, Chris Petherick and Mike Piper presenting me with all kinds of s....t that I am not really looking for. What is going on here? It feels like I stepped into a hole loaded with sneaks. I feel something far deeper than the usual "don't take my job or I kill you" garbage. Paul Angel keeps screwing my articles, he is steering the whole of the AFP toward the left...Willis is unable to control them...Is this new or just an old story? What did actually happen around you, why did they want you out so bad? Bollyn Responds: These questions pertain to my former employer, the Liberty Lobby, and its publications, American Free Press (the erstwhile Spotlight) and the Barnes Review. Having worked for the Liberty Lobby from June 2000 until October 2006, I have some insight into the organization and the people behind it. Let me begin with a few facts and observations. I am an honest and hard-working investigative journalist who worked for the Liberty Lobby’s publications from June 2000 until October 6, 2006. While working for the Spotlight and American Free Press, I did a great deal of original research on 9/11, depleted uranium weapons, school shootings, and electronic vote fraud, among other things. In mid-August 2006 I was assaulted at my home (on private property) by a heavily armed three-man squad of undercover police who TASERed me (while I was handcuffed and held down by two armed men) and broke my right elbow. Willis A. Carto of American Free Press began collecting money for a “legal defense fund” and encouraged me to take Mark Lane as my lawyer. When I spoke to Lane on the phone, he told me that I would have to trust him completely and admitted that he was a Zionist. I decided to look for another lawyer.
Shortly after the attack, Mike Piper of AFP began attacking me and insisted that I not be allowed to speak at the Labor Day conference in Washington. In early October 2006 I was fired from AFP by Chris Petherick who claimed that I had been disloyal to the paper and filed false stories. He never provided any evidence to support these claims. Carto disposed of the money raised for my legal fund and I was purged from American Free Press in the same way that Stalin would purge someone from the Communist Party - and the memory of the Soviet Union. I have been subjected to a vicious campaign of slander from Mike Piper and his cronies ever since. While it may be difficult for an outsider to make sense of all of this, as a person who worked for the Liberty Lobby for more than 6 years and who was then ousted and slandered by the people I had worked with, I have some insight into this odd outfit that calls itself a “populist” newspaper. Mark Weber wrote about Willis Carto and the Liberty Lobby in August 1998: Although Liberty Lobby claims to reveal the hidden forces that secretly control the world, it never discloses just who runs this self-described "populist institution," or how. Even the name is deceitful. Liberty Lobby does almost no lobbying. In fact, Liberty Lobby is essentially a fraud. Although it claims to be directed by its "Board of Policy," it is actually run from behind the scenes by Willis A. Carto -- a shadowy 72-year-old whom a California court has found to be a crook and a liar. Weber is right. I should know, I was the lobbyist for the Liberty Lobby. I was the “Congressional Liaison” when I began working at the Liberty Lobby, which meant that I was to visit the offices of members of Congress on behalf of the lobby and write articles about legislation. There was, however, no structure or instructions for this position whatsoever and I was free to pursue whatever issue I chose. I never received any guidance or met anyone who represented the membership or Board of Policy of the Liberty Lobby except for Willis Carto, whose office was adjacent to mine. There was a door in the wall between our offices and it was always open, except when Carto had meetings with Mark Lane and the accountant, a man named Blayne Hutzel, who wore a Masonic ring. The offices we worked in were dismal and dirty, far below standard for any organization calling itself a newspaper. I found it impossible to work in such conditions and asked Mr. Carto if I could freshen up my office with some cleaning and a new coat of paint. He refused, saying that if I fixed up my office the others would also want their offices cleaned up. In the fall of 2000, after about five months on the job, I was suddenly given a new contract that made me an independent contractor. Mr. Carto gave me this contract to sign while Mark Lane stood in the next room. This new arrangement meant that I lost all insurance benefits and was paid to submit articles. I was responsible for managing my own taxes. Hutzel told me that I should get a "good tax man". This arrangement, which I knew nothing about prior to seeing the contract in front of me, allowed me to work from home but meant a significant reduction in compensation. Later, between 2004 and 2006, Carto reduced my salary even further, twice, in cuts of 10 percent each. He also wanted me to come back to Washington and be the lobbyist for the Lobby. I didn't understand this because I thought our main activity was the newspaper business. I was under the impression that AFP was created to be a real newspaper and not a newsletter of the Liberty Lobby. Furthermore, I did not understand how they were unable to grow the paper in post-9/11 America. Whenever I passed Union Station in Washington I would check to see if there were papers in the boxes, and there were not. I spoke to the employee who was supposed to distribute the papers to the boxes and found that he was not doing it. The paid circulation was only about 20,000, according to the person who managed the subscription data base. The paper was clearly not growing and there was no movement in that direction coming from the employees, who seemed to lack any enthusiasm or patriotic zeal. In January 2006, shortly after I had spoken about the evidence of Thermite at the World Trade Center at the Axis for Peace forum in Brussels, I was suddenly called back from Germany to go on a crazy mission to Venezuela. This hare-brained scheme originated with Carto and Piper, but Piper did not want to do it - so he put it on me. I was supposed to go to Venezuela and arrange a meeting with Hugo Chavez. I was to get Chavez to buy subscriptions to the newspaper for every member of Congress or somehow get him to make a significant donation to the Liberty Lobby. Nothing had been done to prepare for such a mission and very little was explained to me, but the whole thing was dropped on my shoulders. Nobody had even made contact with the Embassy of Venezuela in Washington. I could see that the chances for success were slim, but was willing to give it a shot. The day I left for Venezuela, Carto told me that I would get ten percent of whatever I could get from Chavez. Nothing was put down in writing.
I did not get to see Hugo Chavez, but turned over a package of materials to the Ministry of Information in Caracas when I realized that we (I had invited William Rodriguez and Jimmy Walter to come along) would not have a chance to speak to the president directly. I returned to Washington and headed for Utah to interview Dr. Steven E. Jones on the evidence of Thermite at the World Trade Center.
Although I have written about a number of sensitive subjects, it seems like my articles and discussion of Thermite in the World Trade Center were too hot for the people who controlled American Free Press. Having left Chicago because of intrusive FBI surveillance in the summer of 2005, we were reluctant to stay in our own home. Feeling vulnerable in our home, we visited 9/11 relatives and researchers in the western United States and stayed in safe places. AFP had limited me to one thousand dollars in expenses per month, but I was able to keep my costs down by staying with people who supported 9/11 truth. I was in Davis, California, in June 2006 when Petherick suddenly cut off my expenses completely telling me that I would no longer have any funds for travel, phone calls, or any expenses at all. This happened the day after I had merged the scientific research of Dr. Steven E. Jones with that of Dr. Thomas Cahill at U.C. Davis. The research of these two men confirmed that some form of Thermite had been used to destroy the Twin Towers. Cahill's data from the smoke particles rising from the pile of rubble from October through December 2001 proved that the fires that raged beneath the pile were hotter than the boiling point of iron!
We now had scientific proof that we were dealing with extremely advanced Thermitic explosives. The fact that I was being squeezed by my employers at AFP at the same time I was making scientific breakthroughs on the evidence of Thermite suggests the two are related. When AFP cut off my expenses completely they knew I would have to return to my home, where undercover police were waiting to attack.
I brought this material back to Dr. Jones in Provo, who had asked me to find out whatever I could about the dust. He was very glad to get this material. I bid him a fond farewell in June and warned him of the dangers we faced. Within three months we were both fired from our jobs.
After being fired from American Free Press in October 2006, I learned that Mark Lane is the real owner of the Liberty Lobby and its assets, and has been since 1994. This information came from L.T. Patterson of Cincinnati, owner of the newsletter Criminal Politics. Patterson had been sued by Mark Lane in an attempt to shut down his newspaper and discovered that Lane owned the Liberty Lobby during the legal process. Mark Lane served in U.S. Army intelligence in Germany at the end of the war. Army intelligence became the CIA after the war. Lane played a key role in the Jonestown massacre by pushing the fear button on Jim Jones, which instigated the massacre. Lane is the controlling agent of American Free Press, which pushes the fear button of patriotic Americans every week. Lane was also involved in the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, where he worked closely with Jane Fonda. Later, Fonda married Ted Turner and convinced him to sell CNN to Zionist Jews in New York. This completed the Zionist monopoly of the mass media in the United States. The information about Lane owning the Liberty Lobby came as a surprise, but made complete sense and fit with what I had observed at the Liberty Lobby. There was absolutely no transparency about the finances at the lobby. I remember in 2000-2001 seeing 4 women opening the mail with donations in Blayne Hutzel’s office. Elisabeth Carto and her sister were the ones who ran the daily counting of the donations that came in the mail. I never understood where all that money went because it certainly was not being spent on the employees or the operation, which all ran on a shoe-string budget. Jerry Myers told me that the Cartos had secret bank accounts in Switzerland and Austria. There were certainly many shell companies controlled by Willis Carto. My paychecks, for example, came from an entity called the Committee to Expose Bunk. None of this was ever explained. Myers, an old hand at the lobby, told me a lot of the sordid history about the lobby and I knew it was a very secretive and dodgy operation, but I was glad to be able to write articles about things that mattered and see them in print in the nation's capital. It always bothered me that the distribution of the paper was very poor. The paper was not easily available even in downtown Washington, D.C. It was not even sold in the newspaper shop across the street from the Liberty Lobby. There was clearly a problem with the way the paper was being run. The main people on the production side of the paper were Paul Tudor Angel and Chris Petherick. Petherick was the editor and Angel did the layout. Chris Petherick was a self-proclaimed Satanist who wore a metal stud in his tongue and threw knives in the wall of the office. I never understood how he wound up being the editor of a populist and supposedly patriotic newspaper. He didn’t seem to fit. I was invited to visit Paul Angel’s new house in Virginia toward the end of my career at AFP. He had bought a newly built house about 45 minutes south of Washington on the Interstate. He had married a Panamanian girl who worked at Lockheed and we were invited to see the new house and his baby girl. I was surprised when his wife said, “You don’t believe the stuff that’s in that paper, do you?” Paul chipped in saying that I was one of the paper’s main writers, but I could see that his wife dismissed AFP as nonsense, which made me wonder why Paul worked so hard for Willis Carto and the Liberty Lobby. During the party, I spoke with Paul’s mother, Alice Jones Angel. She mentioned that Paul’s father had died some years earlier. Paul’s father was a chiropractor based in Silver Spring, Maryland, named Dr. Harold H. Angel who was a governor of Optimist International. Harold Angel died in 1972 when Paul was about 12. Paul was still living with his mother when I started at the paper in 2000, and she drove him to the office. Alice Angel died in February 2009. She had worked at the Department of Health and Human Services. Paul has two sisters, Alison P. Angel and Laura Angel-Hanratty. Alison had a career at the U.S. Information Agency and Laura is married to Dennis P. Hanratty, Security Manager of the Department of Defense and member of the board of the Defense and Intelligence Council of ASIS International, an agency that is closely tied to the U.S. Intelligence community. I suspect that Angel's family ties to the military and intelligence community are why Paul Angel is the driving force behind the production of American Free Press. I remember how he and Petherick refused to print my articles that discussed the role of Prozac and similar drugs in school shootings and sedating the 9/11 relatives. "Nice try" is all Paul Angel wrote back when I submitted a story about Prozac-crazed school shooters in America. Both Petherick and Angel told me that they did drugs when I began at the Liberty Lobby in 2000, but they did not mean marijuana. The people behind American Free Press are there simply to control the patriotic movement. They are skimming the cream off of the movement and have done nothing to make it an effective opposition movement. Jerry Myers told me that the Liberty Lobby had paid Mark Lane some five million dollars in legal fees. Mark Weber was correct in his analysis of 1998: Carto has few personal friends, but perhaps his closest is Mark Lane, an East coast Jewish attorney who often represents Carto and Liberty Lobby in court. Lane has a long record of support for liberal and leftist figures, including Martin Luther King and Jim Jones (of Jonestown fame). According to legal documents filed by Liberty Lobby in May 1998, Liberty Lobby pays Lane an annual retainer of $92,500. Question: How do you compare Camp Bucca to a concentration camp? No one was executed there. People were given more medical care than they had anywhere else in their country, including kidney transplants. Personally, I ensure that people held in the area I was responsible for were given education by local Iraqis: reading, writing, some basic social studies. With the exception of those transferred to Iraqi run prisons, all of the people were released. I completely understand the unpopular war, and the hindsight view of many things, but to compare Camp Bucca to a concentration camp, it's not even a stretch. Please reconsider your analogy. - W. K. Bollyn Responds: When I received this comment, I immediately posted a "Note on usage" at the bottom of the article about the Iraq War Logs about the meaning of the term "concentration camp." There is much more to this comment than the question about the meaning of the term and I am in contact with W.K. to discuss these things. I don't want anyone to think that I was using hyperbole in calling Camp Bucca a "modern day concentration camp". I was not. Having visited Dachau, Auschwitz, and Buchenwald, I know what I am talking about when I use the term. This is how the term is defined in the Oxford dictionary at our home: concentration camp - a type of prison, often consisting of a number of buildings inside a fence, where political prisoners are kept in extremely bad conditions The following photos and text are taken from the end of my article on the Iraq War Logs, which were leaked to the media by WikiLeaks on October 22, 2010:
Gen. David H. Petraeus described a concentration camp when he talked about Camp Bucca in 2007: "When I took command of Multinational Force-Iraq in February 2007, we still had Camp Bucca with 17,000 detainees at that time and it grew larger," said Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander, International Security Assistance Force and commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan. "We still had all of the detainees in huge enclosures. It was just fenced-in enclosures of about 800 to 900 detainees per enclosure. Obviously, we have come a long way since then." A concentration camp is defined by Merriam Webster as a camp where persons (as prisoners of war, political prisoners, or refugees) are detained or confined. The Holocaust Encyclopedia has the following definition, which correctly describes U.S. camps like Camp Bucca: The term concentration camp refers to a camp in which people are detained or confined, usually under harsh conditions and without regard to legal norms of arrest and imprisonment that are acceptable in a constitutional democracy. In Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1945, concentration camps (Konzentrationslager; KL or KZ) were an integral feature of the regime. Source: "Concentration Camps", Holocaust Encyclopedia, U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum
Question: We have all read about Barack Obama's intention to build an Islamic center near Ground Zero. This project does appear very suspicious. What, in your opinion, are the real motives behind such a controversial project? Bollyn Responds: BUILDING A MONUMENT TO A FALSEHOOD - This is a sophisticated propaganda ploy by the Rothschild/Zionist-controlled U.S. government and media, designed to underline and cement in the public mind the blatant falsehood that Muslims were responsible for the terror attacks of 9-11. This project is founded on the false premise of Muslim guilt and is meant to create a permanent monument to the falsehood that 9-11 was carried out by Islamic terrorists. The people behind this project are the high-level Rothschild agents involved in the Zionist false-flag terrorism and cover-up of 9-11, including New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch, whose sprawling media empire has pushed the lies about 9-11and the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The political support from the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton for this monument reveals it to be a nefarious Zionist plot to hijack the discussion about 9-11 by distracting the public from the real evidence and stirring up anti-Muslim feelings as the ninth anniversary nears. The recent knife attack on the Moslem taxi driver in Manhattan is the kind of reaction such evil plots produce.
The Israeli government's plan to destroy two mosques on the West Bank is a similar action of the same strategy, which is meant to cause violence and increase tension and hostility against Islam. The Israeli announcement of the outrageous plan to destroy the mosques, which are on Palestinian administered territory in the West Bank, is clearly designed to scuttle - with violence - the planned peace talks in September. Why else would they even consider taking such a unnecessary, self-defeating, and provocative action at this crucial time, especially during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan? Tibor Rosenbaum, a MOSSAD agent and head of the Geneva based Banque du Credit International. This bank was the forerunner to the notorious Bank of Credit and Commerce international (BCCI) which is a major intelligence drug money laundering bank. 'Life' magazine exposed Rosenbaum's bank as a money launderer for the Meyer Lanksky American organised crime family and Tibor Rosenbaum funded and supported 'Permindex' the MI6 assassination unit which was at the heart of the John F. Kennedy assassination. Source: "MI6 Are The Lords of the Global Drug Trade", by James Casbolt (Former MI6 Agent c. 2006) http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4540 When Rosenbaum’s criminal bank (where Zakheim worked) was exposed in the mainstream media in 1975 (e.g. TIME magazine), Zakheim, an agent of the Rothschilds, was brought to Washington and began his new career as an associate analyst of National Security and International Affairs with the Congressional Budget Office. Who did a background check on Dov Zakheim? Zakheim’s most peculiar move from being a senior executive in a criminal Mossad banking enterprise to a position with the U.S. government happened under the reign of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the Rothschild's senior agent in the U.S. government.
At a restaurant in Iowa we talked with our waitress who had refused to go back to Iraq after the army had made her drive trucks up and down "suicide alley" - after they had coaxed her to sign up with a $10,000 bonus. She had been promised that she would have a safe secretarial job but soon found herself driving in fuel convoys on the most treacherous highway in Iraq. They had lied to her and when she came home for a visit, she refused to go back. The army wanted the $10,000 back. I know men who have committed mass murder. Two that come to mind were young men during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, twenty eight years ago. One was a young Israeli from Kibbutz Afikim in the Jordan Valley, where I worked as a lifeguard at the pool. I had known this fellow since he was about 13. His family had migrated to Israel from Argentina and he was a big and friendly boy, at least until he was forced to fight in Lebanon. Later, he confessed to me about the murders he had committed of whole families in Lebanon during the war. He had been a member of a tank crew and as they drove through Lebanon families would come out of their homes with white flags. He had been commanded to fire at them, which he did. He was very tormented by these unjustified killings and he needed to tell me what he had done. I felt sorry for him. More recently, I met a fellow who was involved in the massacre of Palestinians in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila. Again, without asking, this person told me what he had done. When he showed me his scars on his arms and told me that he had been in Sabra and Shatila, I was quite shocked. These massacres are among the most horrific war crimes committed by Israel during my life. This man was only 15 years old when he murdered many innocent people. He is a Maronite Christian who joined the Phalange (with Elie Hobeika's unit) when he was a 13-year-old boy. At that tender age, he was given military training in Israel at Nahariya in 1980. When the Phalange leader Bachir Gemayel was murdered on September 14, 1982, Ariel Sharon sent the Phalange into the Palestinian camps of West Beirut, which the Israeli forces had completely surrounded. The Phalangists, with assistance and support from Israeli forces, massacred with knives thousands of defenseless refugees during a period of three days. The 15-year-old had been deceived by Ariel Sharon and the Israeli Mossad that the Palestinians were responsible for the Gemayel murder. The Israeli military had trained this 13-year-old boy to kill and then used him to murder innocent Palestinians, a crime he will be burdened with forever. Bollyn Responds: This is a good point. First, this boy was only 13 when he was trained by Israelis in Israel. His Phalangist unit was given military training for three months in Nahariya. He was not trained to massacre Palestinians with knives, which is what he and his unit did in Sabra and Shatila. The Israelis cultivated Maronite hatred against the Palestinians with the murder of Bachir Gemayel, as well as previous massacres and killings. Elie Hobeika, the leader of the boy's militia unit, had secret information on what had really gone on in the camps and was ready to tell it to a court in Brussels when he was blown up in a huge car bomb in Lebanon. Of course the actions of the boy were criminal, but I consider the real criminals to be the ones who train 13-year-old Lebanese boys and arrange such massacres in the first place and that responsibility falls squarely on the Israeli military leadership, which was the occupying power controlling access to the camps.
Rothschild was sent into the B'nai B'rith shortly after its founding to launch a ''membership drive" because, as he himself put it, "the members were not all equally well educated and of far different mental capacities." In short, B'nai B'rith was not for just any Jew. Through Rothschild's building job, it was to become an intelligence executive body, whose leaders would subsequently play controlling roles in other British networks, directing the Abolitionist-Slaveholder confrontations of the 1840s and 1850s, the Secession of the South that produced the Civil War, the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, and numerous post-war destabilizations of the American Republic. - “B'nai B'rith, British Weapon Against America”, by Paul Goldstein, The Campaigner, December 1978 Revolutions are usually associated with violence, but they don't have to be. Since 1990, half the nations of Europe and Asia have gone through peaceful revolutions that replaced the former dictatorships of the once mighty Soviet Union. The apartheid regime of South Africa also came to an end without violence. The revolution to restore the sovereignty of the American people certainly need not be violent, and really should not be. This is an excellent question and most appropriate for July 4, when we celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which articulates the fundamental political philosophy of the American Revolution. I am in complete agreement with the signers of July 4, 1776: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
I think the American form of government, as enshrined in the Constitution, is a truly excellent system of government. The U.S. Constitution has been adopted by other nations. Switzerland, for example, used the U.S. Constitution as their model and it has worked very well. The primary difference is that in Switzerland the legislative branch has more power than the executive branch. They did not want an all-powerful president, which I think was a wise decision. In the United States, the executive branch has far too much power having taken over powers that rightfully belong with the people's representatives. The right to declare war, for example, belongs to the U.S. Congress - not the president. Question: RE: “Why Do Jews Commit Massacres?”
Sociopaths never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behavior as permissible. They may appear to be charming, but are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims. They have no problem lying and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. They can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises. They are unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them. They believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, and entitled to every wish. They show no sense of personal boundaries and have no concern for their impact on others. They may even state that their goal is to rule the world. Their goal is the enslavement of their victim(s) and they seek to exercise despotic control over every aspect of the victim's life. The sociopath does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed. A sociopath does not perceive that anything is wrong with them. There is a disregard for and violation of the right's of others, those right's considered normal by the local culture (or international law). ASPD is indicated by at least three of the following. I have indicated those behaviors which A. Repeated acts that could lead to arrest. ( B. Conning for pleasure or profit, repeated lying, or the use of aliases. ( C. Failure to plan ahead or being impulsive. ( D. Repeated assaults on others. ( E. Reckless when it comes to their or others safety. (The aggressive and illegal actions of the Israeli state put all Israelis and Jews at risk. They claim to be acting on behalf of the Jewish people but their reckless actions increase the dangers for all Jews, even those who have nothing to do with F. Poor work behavior or failure to honor financial obligations. ( G. Rationalizing the pain they inflict on others. ( If one considers the behavior of the state of Israel, as expressed through the actions and words of its leaders, especially since the late-1970s when the extreme right-wing Likud Party came to power, one can easily see that Israel – as a state – displays all the symptoms of antisocial personality disorder. It should be remembered that the Likud Party of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the political party of the former Irgun terrorists, headed by such notorious Zionist terrorists as Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir. A political party founded by mass murderers and terrorists certainly must be seen as having antisocial tendencies. Although many clinicians use the terms psychopath and sociopath interchangeably, a sociopath's criminal behavior is shaped by social forces and is the result of a dysfunctional environment, according to psychopath expert Robert Hare in his book Without Conscience. Orthodox Judaism as defined by the rabbis (i.e. Talmudic teaching) is the basis of the "antisocial religion," which is the origin of the "social forces" and "dysfunctional environment" behind the antisocial personality disorder of the state of The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies. Question: How do you prove if a person has been exposed to Depleted Uranium (DU) and what can a person do about the health problems it causes, such as brittle teeth? Does the Veterans Administration (VA) have a policy to help and compensate veterans? I am a retired Army officer, my son was in Iraq with the first group that went in. He was there for 13 months. His job included evacuation of blown out damaged and destroyed armor vehicles, artillery, and tanks from the battle field along with moving troops in and out the front lines. He has a series of health issues that I believe are a result of his time in Iraq (including brittle teeth since he returned) and it is taking a toll. I find it hard for the VA not to acknowledge there is a problem when there is so much documentation and research on the subject. Something needs to be done to help veterans like my son with this. Health Problems Associated with Depleted Uranium Source: http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/depleted_uranium/index.asp Although the VA claims it has found "no health problems" from DU exposure, the following section on VA Benefits certainly says otherwise: "Veterans who were exposed to depleted uranium during military service may be eligible for health care benefits." The VA also says it provides "disability compensation benefits for disabilities that VA determines are associated with depleted uranium exposure."
While Hufschmid has not attacked me as maliciously as the others, he has made the ridiculous claim since the summer of 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Mossad. Using this bizarre claim (which he stubbornly maintains despite abundant proof to the contrary) he says that my writing is "bait" approved by Israeli intelligence. Although he employs a different method, Hufschmid's slander against me has achieved the same result. He has successfully sown suspicion about my credibility and drawn attention to me as a person while completely marginalizing my 9-11 research, which he has ignored since 2007.
Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) wrote a book about Israel’s role in the 9-11 attacks (that I have not read), which must contain a great deal of my research. Thorn’s book was published by American Free Press, where I worked from 2000 until October 2006.  Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn) Although I was the first journalist to write about the Israeli role in the 9-11 attacks and have done far more research (for eight years) than any other writer on the subject, AFP was never interested in doing a book about 9-11 with me. This is an intelligence tactic called “stealing the thunder.” If AFP were truly interested in exposing the Israeli role in 9-11, why have they not asked to publish my ground-breaking book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World? So, what have I done to deserve being subjected to the vicious and concerted campaign of calumny, slander, and libel? What is it that I have done that bothers them so much that they spend time attacking me? This is easy. Apart from raising my family, for the past eight years my only vocation has been to research and write about the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. As an investigative journalist I have led the way in investigating the role of Israeli intelligence and Zionist agents in the United States in the terror attacks of 9-11. If my 9-11 research and writing is the reason these detractors are attacking me with slander and libel, who are they doing it for? It stands to reason that these four are working as agents of an agency that is interested in my research being discredited and marginalized. Because my thesis is that the state of Israel and Zionists in the U.S. are behind 9-11, these must be the same entities behind the anti-Bollyn slander campaign. This makes sense because well-known Zionist entities such as Rupert Murdoch’s FOX News, CNN, and the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz have all tried to smear me as an anti-Semite. Are these four detractors connected with a Zionist agency or the state of Israel? Eric Hufschmid’s father, with whom he works closely, is the father of the wife of Rupert Murdoch’s son James, heir apparent of the Murdoch media empire. Smith is a former narcotics user who has several felony convictions that were suddenly cleared up immediately before he began his career with “The French Connection” in early 2005. Piper and Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) work for a newspaper called American Free Press, where I worked as an independent contractor (since the fall of 2001) after being hired in the spring of 2000. AFP claims to be an employee-owned newspaper, which is a deception meant to fool readers. AFP has no assets to own. Everything of value associated with the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press is held by a host of shell companies with names like “The Committee to Expose Bunk”, which issued my paychecks, for example. Michael Piper is one of the people allowed to sign checks from these entities. The person who is the mastermind of the shell game involving the assets of the Liberty Lobby is Mark Lane, the Jewish lawyer who played a crucial role in the massacre at Jonestown, Guyana.  Mark Lane (center) was present at Jonestown during the massacre. He is considered to have played a key role in provoking the massacre by playing on the fears of Jim Jones. This photo with Jones (left) was taken shortly before the mass suicide/massacre. How odd that Lane became the lawyer, and then owner of the Liberty Lobby several years later. Lane has been the lawyer of the Liberty Lobby since the mid-1980s and received some $5 million in legal fees, according to a veteran Liberty Lobby insider. Lane, who served in U.S. Army Intelligence in Germany at the end of the war, acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1993 or 1994, according to L.T. Patterson (owner of Criminal Politics), who discovered this fact during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson. Who does Lane work for? Lane must work for the C.I.A. Having worked for Army Intelligence in the mid-1940s, it stands to reason that Lane became one of the head honchos in the Jewish intelligence cabal in Army Intelligence that became the C.I.A. in 1949. This would explain Lane’s role in his writings on the Warren Report, the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, Jonestown, and the so-called patriot movement at the Liberty Lobby. But isn’t the C.I.A. working to protect the nation and the people of the United States? Obviously not. The C.I.A. was criticized for being asleep at the switch on 9-11, but it is really much worse than that. The C.I.A. actually works against the interests of the republic and the American people. The C.I.A. is obviously deeply involved in the commission of the terrorism crime of 9-11. Rather than preventing 9-11 or finding the culprits of the atrocity, the C.I.A. has been exploiting the 9-11 deception to wage war using drone warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Asked about the C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded as if she had no legal authority or control over the C.I.A., which was a remarkably candid response from a U.S. Secretary of State. Her response indicated that the C.I.A. is a rogue agency that acts outside the control of the U.S. administration. How can that be? What is the C.I.A.’s interest in Afghanistan and Pakistan? The C.I.A. is clearly not interested in solving 9-11 or finding the culprits. We know that the Twin Towers were demolished using an advanced form of super-thermite (produced using nano-technology) and that the official version that Osama Bin Laden carried out 9-11 from a cave in Afghanistan is nothing but a pack of lies. The C.I.A. is involved in Afghanistan because that’s where most of the world’s opium is produced. George H.W. Bush, the former director of the C.I.A., was also a director of the Eli Lilly Company, the pharmaceutical giant that manufactures Prozac. Bush was also one of the first students at Israel’s Yonatan [Netanyahu] Institute of terrorism in 1979. Since the production of opium has skyrocketed since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, we can assume that opium production is one of the purposes of the war and occupation. Prior to the invasion of 2001, the Taliban regime, which the U.S. is fighting against, had succeeded in eradicating nearly all opium production in Afghanistan. This explains why American Free Press was so strongly opposed to my articles about the dangerous effects of Prozac and similar drugs. When Ellen Mariani, a 9-11 widow, told me that the grieving relatives had been sent to Red Cross doctors who had prescribed Prozac – the editor at AFP cut it out of the story. My subsequent articles about serotonin-affecting drugs and school shootings were rejected out-of-hand. This was clearly a subject that the American Free Press did not want to take up. One has to remember what Andreas von Bülow said about intelligence agencies in December 2001: ”Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation.” The first target of the deception and disinformation of the C.I.A. is the people of the United States. This is a rogue agency that must be disbanded if the American republic is to survive. The C.I.A. is no sacred cow, some sacrosanct institution that can be allowed to carry out its own agenda, wage war, and maintain secret prisons, all in the name of our democratic American republic. The C.I.A. is a rogue agency that is obviously an enemy of American democracy. The United States of America cannot survive as a democratic republic with the C.I.A. operating as the shadow government. The C.I.A. is nothing but a band of organized criminals operating under the guise of the United States. By dissolving the C.I.A. we would obtain answers to many of the crimes committed in the past 60 years. Question: I am making an appeal that you repost the following important articles on your website or link to them somewhere. They are increasingly getting harder to find on the Internet. Many sites just link back to your site and yet they are no longer available at Bollyn.com Some people are just beginning to wake up – they really need to hear what happened and understand the nature and character of Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. I hope to see this information on your site again soon. “Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can” – Daryl B. Smith (Understanding the Methods of Defamation) Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid James B. Phillips Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid & Daryl B. SmithBollyn Responds to Malicious Slander of Daryl B. Smith Bollyn Responds: I have recently received quite a few questions about my detractors, namely Michael Piper, Daryl B. Smith, and Eric Hufschmid. I have reposted these articles under the section entitled The Cure for Disinfo. As the former German intelligence chief Andreas von Buelow told me in December 2001, “Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation.” Marion Fulk, the retired scientist of the Manhattan Project and Livermore Lab, used to tell me that the government “has buildings full of agents” to do their dirty work. When we would go to a restaurant in Livermore after a day spent studying the effects of depleted uranium, there would be several agents tailing us and listening to our conversation. My detractors and those who slander and libel me are working for such people. The truth is coming out and we can all see who has been working for the truth and who has not. The functions of Michael Piper and sticky fly-paper operations like American Free Press are a bit more complicated and something I will take up in the next question.  Marion Fulk (left) and Christopher Bollyn at Fulk’s home in Livermore, California Question of April 14: In human history, are you aware of examples in which the entire population of a country believed in a lie for years, then discovered the lie? Does recognition of truth happen rapidly? What is the usual outcome? What do you predict Mr. Bollyn?  The Katyn Massacre Memorial Bollyn Responds: Big lies are really not that unusual, especially when massacres are involved. History is littered with them. The Katyn Massacre comes to mind. The recent crash of the plane of the Polish president and 96 others has brought this extremely painful “Big Lie” back into the spotlight. The Katyn Massacre was the mass murder of some 22,000 Polish nationals by the Soviet secret police, a massacre which had been approved by the entire Soviet Politburo, including Joseph Stalin, Britain’s ally in its “unnecessary war” against Germany. Nazi Germany announced the discovery of mass graves in the Katyn Forest in 1943 and was immediately blamed - without a single stitch of evidence - by the Allies and Western media for the atrocity. Hitler actually called for an investigation into the killings, although it was not until 1990 that the Soviet Union officially acknowledged and condemned the perpetration of the killings by the Soviet NKVD, and the subsequent cover-up.  The Ground Zero Cross The massacre and terror atrocity of 9-11 are very similar to the Katyn Massacre. The blame was wrongly placed on Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida – without any evidence - in order to usher in the pre-planned “War on Terror” with an illegal invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and subsequently Iraq. The crucial evidence of the crime of 9-11 was quickly destroyed and a politically controlled non-investigation managed under the direction of Michael Chertoff, a dedicated agent of the actual culprits – Israeli intelligence and their Zionist quislings in the United States.  Michael Chertoff was the key person responsible for the destruction of the evidence of 9-11 – and the cover-up. Chertoff, the son of an Israeli Mossad agent named Livia Eisen, is an Israeli by birth. The Zionist-controlled media ignored the evidence of Israeli involvement and pushed the official version, which is really nothing more than a pack of lies. Nothing good will ever come from such evil deceit, and nothing good has come from the lies surrounding 9-11. For more than 8 years the world has been deceived about what really happened on 11 September 2001 and why we are engaged in the War on Terror - but the truth is coming out. The dam of lies and deceit is breaking and it is no longer possible to hold back the Truth. The culprits and those who have assisted the cover-up are becoming very uncomfortable. The liars and rats of the 9-11 deception will be washed away by the flood waters of Truth.  The Dedication of the Cross Comment of April 9: Dear Mr Bollyn. I am one of your fans. I thought you would like this article, in case you did not read it yet. I wonder if Mr. Wilkerson [Col. Lawrence B.] might be one of many “whistle blowers” who come to light in coming weeks and months? George W. Bush ‘knew Guantánamo prisoners were innocent’ The Times (U.K.) April 9, 2010 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7092435.ece George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld covered up that hundreds of innocent men were sent to the Guantánamo Bay prison camp because they feared that releasing them would harm the push for war in Iraq and the broader War on Terror, according to a new document obtained by The Times.
The accusations were made by Lawrence Wilkerson, a top aide to Colin Powell, the former Republican Secretary of State, in a signed declaration to support a lawsuit filed by a Guantánamo detainee. It is the first time that such allegations have been made by a senior member of the Bush Administration. Colonel Wilkerson, who was General Powell’s chief of staff when he ran the State Department, was most critical of Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld. He claimed that the former Vice-President and Defence Secretary knew that the majority of the initial 742 detainees sent to Guantánamo in 2002 were innocent but believed that it was “politically impossible to release them”.  Who said never again? Guantanamo is a real concentration camp in our time. Children as young as 12 and 13 and elderly as old as 92 or 93 were taken to Gitmo. Why are the people behind this outrageous crime being protected from prosecution? When will President Obama close the Gitmo Gulag and begin an investigation of the abuses committed there? Why delay what has to be done? Answer: Yes, there will certainly be others coming forward who will expose the lies and deception of 9-11 and the Zionist fraud known as the “War on Terror.” The real question is when and what kind of legal action will follow to investigate and punish those who are really behind 9-11 and the subsequent ”War on Terror” that has destroyed so many lives? I recommend Andy Worthington’s article of April 14. “Wilkerson Demolishes Bush, Cheney, And Rumsfeld’s Lies About Guantanamo” in The Public Record: For Col. Wilkerson, who remains “extremely concerned that the Armed Forces of the United States, where I spent 31 years of my professional life, were deeply involved in these tragic mistakes,” the need for accountability has a particularly personal meaning, but for the rest of us, it should be no less important that torture was used to justify an illegal war, that it infected the U.S. military, that those who authorized it remain free to continue spreading their poisonous lies (in Dick Cheney’s case, at least), and that men continue to languish in Guantánamo as a result of it — and also as a result of the Obama administration’s unwillingness, or refusal to confront the very facts that Col. Wilkerson has disclosed. Worthington’s article is at: http://pubrecord.org/commentary/7416/wilkerson-demolishes-bush-cheney/ Wilkerson’s signed statement (pdf) of March 24, 2010 is here. Question of April 6: Dear Mr. Bollyn: I have been reading many articles on the 9-11 atrocity and other major world events. I am a 46-year-old Ashkenazi Jew from London, England. I believe the Rothschilds and the banking conspiracy are behind EVERYTHING. When I bring the subject up with my peers and family, I am told it is anti-Semitic nonsense, probably paid for by the Saudi Arabians. If there is no actual proof, and the Rothschilds are so powerful, please help me to understand why so much data is available on the Internet. Am I missing something? Surely the Rothschilds would be able to prevent this data surfacing under libel or slander laws, or anti-defamation. Thank you. I look forward to your reply. Answer: Yes, the Rothschilds are behind much of what goes on – especially when it concerns the outlaw state of Israel. The Rothschild family was the prime mover and financier of the Zionist project to settle Russian and Polish Jews in Palestine. The 1917 Balfour Declaration which promised British support for a home for world Jewry in Palestine was addressed to Lord Rothschild (Lionel Walter, 2nd Baron Rothschild 1868-1937), head of the English branch of the Jewish banking family – and unofficial head of British Jewry. The Balfour Declaration gave great impetus to the Zionist movement that eventually resulted in the state of Israel. The Rothschild bankers were obviously calling the shots in Britain in 1917. Lionel’s father, the 1st Baron Rothschild, was able in 1875 to give £4,000,000 to Britain’s first Jewish prime minister, D’Israeli (later Disraeli), to become the principal stockholder in the Suez Canal Company. Prior to World War I Zionism represented only a minority of Jews, mostly from Russia, but led by Austrian and German Jews. By 1914 there were about 90,000 Jews in Palestine; 13,000 settlers lived in 43 Jewish agricultural settlements, many of them supported by the French Jew Baron Edmond de Rothschild. The Rothschilds are able to control governments by being primary lenders of money to national banks, like the Federal Reserve. In the past 40 years the United States has gone from being the largest creditor nation to becoming the largest debtor nation. This is how the U.S. has lost its independence and much of its felicity. The greater the debt, the greater the control gained by the international bankers like the Rothschilds. (to be continued…) Question of April 2: I just listened to Dr. Sabrosky’s broadcast. He was pretty convincing although I felt he was a little short on details. He seemed to place a great deal of his case on the fall of WTC 7, but never once did he say anything about Larry Silverstein and only one very brief mention of nano-thermite. 9-11 was such a complicated operation and required the cooperation of many people. I’m sure you have told us before, but why was it necessary to bring down WTC 7? The fall of WTC 7 is so obviously controlled demolition, why would those responsible take the risk of exposing their crime by demolishing 7 in this way? There had to have been something in that building that was so important to make it worth their great risk to demolish it. Or did they simply feel so confident that they could do this in plain sight and have complete confidence in their control of our government and media? Answer: The demolition of WTC 7 is the event that revealed to Dr. Alan Sabrosky and Dr. Steven Jones (and many others) that the official version of 9-11 is a pack of lies. Destroying WTC 7 was obviously crucial to the whole false-flag terror operation. There are two main explanations for this. First, it may have housed equipment and personnel that played a role in the destruction of the WTC towers, for example in the specially fortified bunker on the 22nd or 23rd floor. Secondly, it housed the offices of federal agencies involved in investigations of serious financial crimes. The destruction of the evidence would have been crucial in both cases. The vault beneath WTC 6 held much of the evidence for the federal agencies in WTC 7 and this vault was evidently cleaned out the night before 9-11, according to Kurt Sonnenfeld, the FEMA photographer who looked into it. The Zionist perpetrators have complete confidence that they could get away with this because of their control of our government and media, as you say, but the real key was having control of the buildings prior to 9-11 and having Michael Chertoff in the key position to control the destruction of the evidence and non-investigation of the crime. WTC 7 was owned by Larry Silverstein and had been built with Israeli contractors in the mid-1980s, when the Zionist plan for the destruction of the WTC had already been developed. The main strategic reason for the Israeli false-flag terror of 9-11 was to usher in the “War on Terror” and bring the U.S. military into the Middle East on a permanent basis – to protect Israel’s hegemony in the region. See: “America the Target: 9-11 and Israel’s History of False Flag Terrorism” http://www.bollyn.com/america-the-target-9-11-and-the-history-of-false-flag-terrorism Question of March 26: In a recent radio interview, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (a former director of the US Military War College, General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research, among other highly impressive credentials) stated that top American military brass know Israel did 9/11. A four part series of this interview is on Youtube. Dr. Sabrosky stated that in recent weeks he has brought this to the attention of many high level military contacts, who now realize Israel’s role in 9/11. Do you believe it’s true that top military officers are just now beginning to realize what you’ve been saying, and if so, what might be the outcome? Dr. Alan Sabrosky discusses increasing awareness in the U.S. military that Israel is behind 9-11 and disastrous war policies in Iraq and Afghanistan. IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation – period. - Dr. Alan Sabrosky If these Americans and those like them ever fully understand just how much of their suffering – and the suffering we have inflicted on others – is properly laid on the doorsteps of Israel and its advocates in America, they will sweep aside those in politics, the press and the pulpits alike whose lies and disloyalty brought this about and concealed it from them. They may well leave Israel looking like Carthage after the Romans finished with it. It will be Israel’s own great fault. - Alan Sabrosky, “Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond”, Sept. 10, 2009 Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year U.S. Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College. Answer: In the video clip, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (who says that he has Jewish ancestors) claims he has informed people at the highest levels of the U.S. military that Israeli Mossad criminals are behind 9-11. He says that most of the people in the U.S. military brass were not aware of Israel’s role in 9-11 and are truly shocked and enraged when they realize that the U.S. has been duped and deceived by Israeli intelligence. I don’t doubt that for a minute. I believe that the 9-11 deception was not understood by the people at the top. This is why the title of my book is Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World. Had the deception of the false-flag terror atrocity been widely understood in the military, I certainly would not have been attacked, maliciously prosecuted, and tried in a corrupt Chicago court in 2007 with virtually no support from the U.S. military and other institutions. Articles about the conspiracy behind the brutal police attack and my trial can be found in The Bollyn Trial section. There has, however, been a very significant and noticeable sea change in how the U.S. and British governments and media treat Israel during the past few weeks and I think that Dr. Sabrosky’s revelations may be connected with that change. I am very encouraged by this development, to say the least. Question of March 17: Just today, Wayne Madsen has disclosed another very important link in the chain of evidence: he reports that an El Al 747 departed from JFK for Tel Aviv at 4:11 p.m. on 9/11/2001 and it was full. Would you please pause for a moment to contemplate the evidentiary significance of confirming the complete list of passengers who embarked for Tel Aviv on that unauthorized flight? Answer: I would expect that Ehud Olmert and many of the Israelis who were behind the terrorism of 9-11 were on this plane. As I pointed out in December 2007, Ehud Olmert, the Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem and deputy prime minister of Israel, was in New York City on the eve of 9-11. The fact that this high level Israeli politician was in New York City on September 10, 2001 has been kept secret. I would assume that this visit has been kept secret because it involved the false-flag terror attacks of the following day. I suspect that Olmert was in New York City during the attacks. It would, of course, be very interesting to get the passenger list. I will see what I can do. Question and Comment: With the information that is now available, why has the insurance company that paid off on Lucky Larry’s [Silverstein] fraudulent World Trade Center terrorism claim not made some kind of effort to get their money back? Hope you can provide some insight on this. I would also like to comment on my view of the state of the world. Obviously things were not “hunky dory” prior to 9-11, but since that fateful day, the criminal network has been given a blank check to do anything. The American populace seems asleep, thinking only of shopping, sports, money – just making it through their own lives. Answer: This is a very good question. Much of the money that has been paid out in 9-11 claims has actually come from U.S. taxpayer funds. I had read that the insurance companies were actually reimbursed in this way, but have not seen the documentation. The recently litigated payout to the first responders came from a $1 billion FEMA fund, for example. I will try to check if the WTC insurers were also compensated with U.S. taxpayer money. One thing that needs to be understood about the ownership of the WTC towers is that agents of the state of Israel became the de facto owners of the WTC when Silverstein took control of the towers in late July 2001. “Sources in the Port Authority intimated that even though they were still in the vicinity, Silverstein was in control,” Haaretz reported in its 2001 article, “Up in smoke”. Through the Silverstein takeover, which was supervised by Lewis Eisenberg of the Port Authority, agents of Israeli intelligence gained access and complete control of the WTC property that was the target of their carefully planned terrorist attack.  Lewis Eisenberg at the scene of the crime – Eisenberg, a partner at Goldman Sachs, was the head of the Port Authority (the owner of the World Trade Center) in 2001 and was the key person who facilitated the property falling into the hands of Larry Silverstein. The Silverstein takeover was essential to the Israeli’s evil plan because in order to carry out such a sophisticated false-flag terror operation with complete security, owning the property was a requirement. Here are the three principal agents of the takeover:  Larry Silverstein Larry Silverstein, former owner of Runway 69, a Queens strip club, is a close friend and business partner of Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak. Silverstein has been close to Netanyahu since he served as Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations. “For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein,” Haaretz reported. “It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance. A recent article on Voltairenet.org claims that Silverstein was treasurer of Netanyahu’s terrorism school, the mysterious Jonathan Institute and of his electoral campaigns. I have not seen that before and will look to see if it is true. A good article on Silverstein’s friendship and business connections to Netanyahu and Barak is “Up in Smoke” from the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz. (American Friends of the Jonathan Institute was established in Washington, D.C. in March 1977 and in New York City in care of Feder & Gopin in June 1977, two years before its first conference.) Silverstein was accused, along with Bill Clinton and Colin Powell, of being involved in drug smuggling and other crimes in a 1997 lawsuit Harry P. Miller v. Larry Silverstein, et al.  Lloyd M. Goldman Lloyd Goldman is Silverstein’s behind-the-scenes equity partner on the World Trade Center lease, was chairman of the finance committee of the American Associates of Ben Gurion University in 2000 and is currently national vice president. Ben Gurion University is affiliated with Israel’s Nuclear Research Center – Negev (NRCN), which is involved in developing nano-composite energetic materials like the super-Thermite which was found in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers. The crucial question about 9-11 that needs to be answered is who made the super-Thermite that demolished the concrete of the World Trade Center, and who applied it to the interior surfaces, probably the undersides of the 220 floor pans? The evidence indicates that 9-11 was an Israeli-engineered act of false-flag terrorism, which would mean that Israel probably produced the nano-composite of Thermite. The Nuclear Research Center Negev, which is where Israel produces its nuclear weapons, has long been involved in development of super-Thermite. Lloyd Goldman’s close connection to Ben Gurion University means that getting super-Thermite from the NRCN into the Twin Towers would practically be an in-house operation. Goldman is poised to take over the World Trade Center project when Silverstein, who is nearly 80, retires. See – “Meet the Other Trade Center Builder”, Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008  Frank Lowy Frank Lowy is the third key partner in the World Trade Center takeover. Born in 1930 into a family of modest means in Slovakia (then Czecho-Slovakia), Lowy spent the war years in Budapest, then moved to Palestine where he fought in the underground for the Zionist army, the Haganah. By 17, he was in an elite commando unit of the Israeli Army, fighting behind enemy lines in the War of Independence. In 2006 he established Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, which incorporates the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies. Comment of March 8: Chris, just wanted you to see this article….dang, I don’t understand people lying about you this way, just wanted you to see it, thank you, and keep up the good work, N. http://www.takeourworldback.com/bollynfalseflag.htm Bollyn Responds: I have not read the whole article but can clearly see by the style and content that it is written by Michael Bernard Piper (a.k.a. Michael Collins Piper) of American Free Press. This is obviously more of his nonsensical lies and slander. One needs to understand that Piper is paid to attack me on behalf of the Zionist Jew Mark Lane and the controlled opposition/flypaper outfit Lane runs out of the Liberty Lobby. If there was a fire in the HVAC unit on the roof of the building of the former I.B.M. Global Network Services (sold to AT&T a year before I left the company in May 2000), how should I know about it and what does it have to do with me? I was living in Germany where I had been since November 2001. How should I know about a minor fire in Schaumburg, Illinois? The main point of the article is to attack my credibility by calling me a liar, a Judas Goat, and an “intelligence operative”. The detailed information about Piper and his show indicates that the source of the article is Piper, and he is lying throughout. He is the Judas Goat who is projecting his sins on me in an effort to sow suspicion about my work and motives. When Piper says that he “allowed” me to stand in and host his show during the summer of 2006 he is using the wrong word. I was asked to do this and tried to avoid it because it was an extra obligation that I would have difficulty doing as I was on the road in the western United States. The real question is why does Piper, who lavished fulsome praise on me everytime he had me on his show in 2006 about being “America’s best journalist, bar none”, spend so much time and effort attacking me? Piper has obviously been tasked to do everything he can to sow suspicion about me and try to discredit my research and writing. He reveals how he tries to damage my credibility in these lines: If Bollyn really were an honest truth teller and genuine investigative journalist, he would not be lying like this. And if a supposedly honest journalist is known to be lying about some matters of fact, how can his word be trusted on anything? Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. It is interesting that Piper and Eric Hufschmid are doing the exact same thing, albeit in different ways. Hufschmid claims that I have been kidnapped and that my articles are being written by the Mossad, while Piper calls me a liar and intelligence operative. Both of them want to sow suspicion, which once planted in a reader’s mind, is very difficult to remove. But, what have I done to deserve this treatment? Answer: I have investigated and revealed too much about what really happened on 9-11. This is the same reason I was treated by the undercover police in Hoffman Estates as I was, and prosecuted as I was. It is interesting to note that Piper takes the word of the corrupt police of Chicagoland as gospel truth. My statement that the water had been turned off in the cell and that I was told “drink from the toilet” is supposedly disproven by the fact that there is a photo of a Hoffman Estates jail cell with a sink and toilet.  Michael Piper It should be noted that Piper sent me a very nasty email in December 2001 as we prepared to go to Moscow for a 9-11 conference. I thought at the time that it couldn’t possibly be from Piper and that someone must have hacked into his mailbox, but I now realize that this is exactly how he operates. He acts like he has a license to lie. He has never been a friend of mine. Question of March 5: Is Barbara Olson back from the dead? An anonymous person sent me a photo of Barbara Olson (said to have died on 9-11) side-by-side with an image of Lady Booth, the wife of Theodore Olson, former U.S. Solicitor General. There is no doubt that these two women look nearly identical. The question is whether the Barbara Olson (born Barbara Kay Bracher in Houston on December 27, 1955) is the same person as Lady Evelyn Booth (born in Louisville, Kentucky, on October 26, 1960) – or do they simply look very similar? While it is certainly possible with plastic surgery and the theft of an identity that this could happen, it is also possible that Ted simply chose a new wife that looked very much like his previous wife.  The similarity between the two wives of Ted Olson is remarkable. Is Lady Booth really Barb Olson after plastic surgery? The face on the right seems to have had cosmetic surgery.   Barbara Olson’s ear, seen here, can be compared with those of Lady Booth. Are they similar?  Lady Booth Olson This is an interesting question, which I will look into. What is very interesting about Barbara Bracher is that she earned her Juris Doctor at Yeshiva University in New York City. Yeshiva University is a private Jewish school which is very Jewish. Why would a young Catholic girl, who had worked for H.B.O. and Stacy Keach in Hollywood, choose to study law at Yeshiva University? It is possible that Barb Olson has Jewish roots and that this is why she chose Yeshiva University. Another odd thing about Barbara Bracher is that she lived in McLean, Virginia in the early 1990s which makes one wonder if she was working for the C.I.A. While Barbara Olson had very close connections to orthodox Jews and Zionism, her husband actually worked to protect the crimes of the state of Israel when he defended the Israeli spy, Jonathan Jay Pollard. How did he get that case - and why did he take it? Ted and Barbara Olson’s ties to Israeli intelligence need to be taken into consideration when pondering their roles in the false flag terror of 9-11. As a partner of the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Theodore Olson served as lead counsel for George W. Bush in Bush v. Gore before the U.S. Supreme Courth, which secured Bush’s election as President of the United States. Bush then appointed Olson as United States Solicitor General which he was from, 2001-2004. At Yeshiva University, Ted Olson recalled that Barbara Bracher had been the person who officially kicked the Palestinian office out of the United States: In her third year of law school [Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University], Barbara somehow managed to finesse herself into an internship in the Department of Justice in Washington. And, as a very brassy and gutsy intern, she managed to be the only employee of the government of the United States willing, feisty, and fearless enough to personally serve the papers on the PLO mission to the United Nations in New York announcing that it was being expelled from this country—because they were terrorists. How proud Barbara was to tell that story to her friends at Cardozo! Question of March 2: Have you heard that it is very possible that Dr. Steven Jones and his nano-thermite theory could very well be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement down a false path? Dr. Judy Wood theorizes that a Directed Energy Weapon was used to turn the steel into dust. Her theory is very compelling, and this could very well explain why Steven Jones has gotten so far with his nano-thermite theory. Answer: Yes, I have heard about that theory. I was probably the first person to have written about this “theory” of a directed energy beam being involved in 9-11 after having an interview with a “former” spy from East Germany, who admitted to having worked with the Mossad. See: http://www.bollyn.com/mossad-in-germany-and-9-11-disinfo The evidence, however, of nano-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center is solid proof that this advanced nano-composite explosive was used to pulverize the towers. This is not to say that other explosives were not used, such as cutter charges on the central columns or huge bombs in the basements of the towers. As Dr. Jones would say, the data doesn’t lie. The theory of an energy weapon being used to demolish the towers is not supported by the evidence. I consider it to be a kind of red herring theory meant to distract people from the evidence of explosives and super thermite. Question of February 26: It’s been at least a week with no postings on your website? Are you OK? Inquiring minds want to know… Bollyn Responds: Yes, I am fine. I have been busy doing the final editing of the first 14 chapters of my book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World. I did this and printed out the chapters for a supporter in Canada who requested a copy of the book. This took some time away from the article that I am working on, which is about Kenneth Feinberg, the Special Master of the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund. It will come as no surprise that Kenneth Feinberg is a high-level agent of the Israeli government and the Mossad. This article involved quite a bit of research but I hope to have it published in the coming days.  9-11 Special Master Kenneth Feinberg and his wife Diane “Dede” Shaff Feinberg are high-level agents of the state of Israel. Feinberg and his law firm was given an open account from the U.S. Treasury and doled out billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars – without any oversight or accountability - to the families of 9-11 victims to keep them from seeking justice and discovery through the courts. Some 98 percent of the 9-11 families took the money from the fund. Who got how much and who all got paid in the process is a closely guarded secret. Why? The 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund is U.S. taxpayer money after all. We have every right to see how it was disbursed.  Alvin K. Hellerstein: Orthodox Jew and devoted Zionist The same law that created the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund also stipulated that all 9-11 related lawsuits would go through the U.S. District Court of Manhattan, where Alvin K. Hellerstein, an orthodox Jew and devoted supporter of Israel has prevented any case from going to trial. Nearly every single lawsuit concerning a victim of 9-11 has been settled out of court. Thanks to the efforts of the dedicated Zionist team headed by Kenneth Feinberg and Alvin Hellerstein it is very unlikely that there will ever be a 9-11 trial for the worst terror crime in U.S. history. What kind of justice is that? Who are they protecting? Comment: I am reading your book, Solving 9/11. Your quote attributed to Menachem Begin “We are the master race” supposedly delivered at a meeting of the Knesset seems far fetched. Did you check the source of that quote? I did a little checking and read that it was invented by Texe Marrs. Do you have any sources for the quote? Thanks, your work is fascinating. Bollyn Responds: The addition of the Begin quote was a recent change. Since the quote cannot be sourced, I have removed it. The text now uses the Begin quote from Kapeliouk’s article: “[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs.” – Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, “Begin and the ‘Beasts,”‘ New Statesman, June 25, 1982. Comment from a Gulf War Vet: Hello, I am not sure if this goes to Mr. Bollyn or not but I am giving it a shot. I was reading your August 15, 2004 article on depleted uranium and Gulf War Vets. I was a combat engineer during the Gulf War and I wanted to support your article. I am 39 years old and have spent my days since the war in college and now I teach school. I am a non-smoker and live a simple life. In December I was diagnosed with kidney cancer and it spread a bit to the lymphnods. The surgery was hell and now I face a life with cancer. Well thanks for your time and thanks so much for your article on this subject. I am filing a claim with the VA. Bollyn’s Response: This vet is suffering from the effects of D.U. exposure, as are many others. This is an extremely dangerous weapon that should be banned. My four-part series on depleted uranium can be read here: http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2004/08/15_bollyn_depleted-uranium-blamed-cancer.htm Marion Fulk and Christopher Bollyn My research on “depleted” uranium weapons was aided immensely by Marion Fulk of Livermore, California (left). Marion spent most of his working life as a scientist in the employ of the U.S. government, from the Manhattan Project to Livermore Lab. Now retired, Fulk said he wanted to help inform the public of the long-term damage to human health caused by the use of uranium-tipped weapons. Question: Do you post or send articles to Rense and Jones? Did look, can’t find much recent. Answer: Websites that post my material or links to my articles do so of their own choosing. Two very good sites that re-post my material are RebelNews.org and TruthSeeker.co.uk. Here is the link to some of my material on RebelNews.org and here is the link to my material on TruthSeeker.co.UK: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/columnist.asp?ID=6 Question: Can’t even say in words how much I appreciate such extremely rare honest reporting in these dangerous times! Suggestion: Times are tough–can you add a $5 button to the array of PayPal buttons for donations, since even $10 might be too out of reach for some? Answer: Yes, I will do that. Comment: Re the black box on Flight 77 shows “cabin doors not open” means nothing since there was no evidence that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. There was no released video of Pentagon crash. No recognizable Boeing 757 parts, the penetration of the walls was too deep and too narrow for a 757, no wing or engine marks on building, etc. So, why do you think this story is special? Just curious? Bollyn’s Response: You are quite right. There is no evidence that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon nor do I think that one did crash into the building. We don’t know where this black box of Flight 77 really came from but the story is about an independent investigation of the data on the box that is said to be from Flight 77. It is just another small piece of the puzzle showing the massive deception of 9-11. Question: My friend sent me this link about an upcoming 9-11 conference in Manhattan. I wish you were on it. Lenny Charles is putting it together. http://www.howtheworldchanged.org/index.html Bollyn Responds: I was not invited to the 9-11 event being put on by Lenny Charles, owner of INN World News. Judging from the invited speakers and panel subjects, I seriously doubt if his 9-11 event at the Walker Stage will discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement, which is the basis of my thesis about the false flag terror that precipitated the Zionist “War on Terror” and the invasion of Afghanistan. Having spoken with Mr. Charles on September 3, I am even more inclined to believe that the question of “Who did it?” will not be delved into. The Orthodox Jewish and Israeli gangsters (e.g. Joseph “Yossi” Shereshevsky, Amnon Cohen, and Avi Benamu) behind the WexTrust Securities scam are the Jewish criminals who financed the current (secret) owners of INN’s 56 Walker St. building. Why are the Israeli partners in the WexTrust fraud being protected by the court and media? Although the Israelis involved in the WexTrust scam are kept concealed and protected, this is clearly the real reason why Lenny Charles is reluctant to discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. The Israeli connection is specifically meant NOT to be on the agenda. That’s what controlled media means. Even the alternative media is controlled. Who controls Lenny? (The answer to this crucial question is shocking and will be subject of my next article.)  Lenny Charles (right) of INN World Report  Lenny Charles of INN is the front man for the mystery owner of 56 Walker Street. Who might that be and why is his identity kept secret? I don’t know much about Lenny Charles. He said in a 2009 video interview that he is from New Jersey and that he was educated at the El Paso campus of the University of Texas, which is an unusual place for a kid from New Jersey. Lenny says he was a jazz musician for 25 years before starting INN World News, which is based in a high-rent building in Manhattan’s Tribeca neighborhood. How does Lenny manage it? Charles is also listed as representing a company called SKG Media How does Lenny Charles and his 56 Walker Street job fit in with all of this gang, which is clearly involved in criminal fraud? and as the contact person for Walker Stage, located at 56 Walker Street in Manhattan. SKG is often used to refer to the media moguls Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen, but are they the money behind Lenny Charles and INN? Walker Stage is a nightclub owned by 56 Walker LLC, whoever that might be. A search for the owner turns up a host of legal cases that involve 56 Walker LLC and people named Avroham and Joseph Shereshevsky and a sprawling octopus company called Wextrust, which has many holding companies such as WexTrust Capital LLC, doing business in Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan in Israel and operating mining operations in Africa. For the details of INN’s connections to Zionist money, read: “The Zionist Gang Behind New York’s 9/11 Conference” by Christopher Bollyn http://www.bollyn.com/the-zionist-gang-behind-new-yorks-9-11-conference  Joseph Shereshevsky (left, son of the rabbi Chaim Shereshevsky of Brooklyn) a Norfolk resident and former COO of WexTrust Capital and Steven Byers, the company’s founder and CEO, were each hit with fraud and conspiracy charges. When he was arrested for his part in the $100 million pyramid scheme in August 2008, Shereshevsky held a one-way plane ticket to Israel. After they were busted, Byers made a $500 donation to Barack Obama on August 23, 2008. (Courtesy of www.vosizneias.com) In August 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged WexTrust Capital and its affiliates with fraud, alleging that the company ran a Ponzi scheme that raised at least $255 million by targeting members of the Orthodox Jewish community. The S.E.C. said WexTrust’s principals, Steven Byers and Joseph Shereshevsky, deceived at least 1,196 investors since 2002. The defendants diverted at least $100 million to unauthorized purposes, according to the S.E.C.’s complaint. The SEC charge against WexTrust, a Chicago-based company, can be read here. An interactive time line of the case is here. Question: I found it interesting that your ancestors are related to Anne Boleyn. Aren’t you spelling your name wrong?  THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL – Queen Elizabeth I, the most famous queen in English history, is known for fostering the English Enlightenment and defeating the Spanish Armada. Elizabeth was the daughter of Anne Boleyn, the most persistently maligned of English queens. The Boleyn family has suffered a vicious and relentless campaign of defamation for nearly 500 years. Prior to the religious reforms initiated by the Boleyn family, the Vatican owned a third of all the land of England. Bollyn Responds: The Bollyn (Boleyn) name is originally from West Flanders. The ancestors of Queen Anne Boleyn came from the area around Calais in Boulonnais, which was then English territory across the channel from Dover. Anne’s great-grandfather, Geoffrey, was a wealthy mercer (importer of fine fabrics) who became the Lord Mayor of London in 1457. There were no strict rules for spelling in English at the time. Anne’s father spelled the name Bullen. In the historical literature about Anne Boleyn there are at least 30 different spellings of the name. Anne, who was well educated and multi-lingual having lived in Flanders and France as a child, seems to be the one who made the “Boleyn” spelling stick. “La petite Boulain” is how the Archduchess Margaret of Austria described the 12-year-old Anne, who served as a maid of honor in the court of Burgundy at Mechelen. The Boulain spelling captures the long “ay” sound in the second syllable, which is actually the correct pronunciation of the name, at least in Flemish or Dutch. Our family has spelled the name Bollyn since at least 1860 in St. Louis, which is as far back as I have documented. Some time before that the family of Henry Bollyn immigrated to the United States from Switzerland. Henry’s first daughter was named Anne, but she died in Kentucky at the tender age of 10 months. A year or two later he was blessed with another daughter, which he also named Anne. My father and grandfather were named Albert Bollyn, which happens to be the same name as a Belgian held in the Nazi concentration camp of Dachau from 1944-1945. I don’t know much about this Albert Bollyn but I suppose he was probably arrested for resisting tyranny. It runs in the family.  Question: Do you receive the American Free Press (AFP) newspaper? There are two copies in September 2010 that try to convey that they are right on top of the 9/11 issue, which makes me annoyed, as you are the one who has done all the serious research. Bollyn Responds: This question came from a person who has been reading my work for a long time. No, I don’t read AFP, which is a newspaper I wrote for from 2000 until October 2006. The newspaper is run by Willis Carto and his lawyer friend Mark Lane. According to information gleaned during a lawsuit in which Lane was suing L.T. Patterson of Criminal Politics, Mark Lane acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1994. This indicates that AFP is nothing but an asset of the C.I.A., which runs it as a controlled opposition mouthpiece. Mark Lane is an old Army intelligence agent from WWII in Germany. Lane played a key role in the Jonestown massacre, which he witnessed and is said to have instigated by using fear tactics on the paranoid Rev. Jim Jones. This is similar to what AFP does to its readers. Lane’s relationship with AFP explains the paper’s bizarre actions I observed as I got closer to the truth about 9/11. AFP is now publishing articles about 9/11 that suggest that there were no planes on 9/11 (see “Absence of Real Photo Evidence Leads to Video Fakery Speculation”, October 11, 2010). In an article from September 20, 2010, Makufka asks whether “mini-nukes” were used to bring down the WTC. These “disinfo” articles are written by Scott R. Makufka who writes under the name “Victor Thorn”. Makufka and his girlfriend Lisa Giuliani teamed up with Michael Piper after I was attacked by undercover police. They sought to impugn my credibility and claim my research as their own in a concerted Zionist effort to marginalize my work, and have me prosecuted and thrown in jail.  Scott Makufka and Lisa Giuliani were part of the anti-Bollyn disinfo hit squad, along with Michael Piper. Why would AFP turn on its own reporter after 6 years of good reporting? It is very clear from the evidence that Boeing airplanes hit the Twin Towers, the only question is exactly which planes they were. Photographs reveal that more durable parts, such as landing gear and engines from the aircraft, landed on the streets of Manhattan.  This engine from the aircraft that struck the South Tower landed on Murray Street. The parts of this engine are all marked with specific numbers that would identify precisely which aircraft they belonged to. Why haven’t they been shown to the public? Why the secrecy about exactly which jet engine this is?  Every time-tracked part of the aircraft is numbered, such as this piece.  This landing gear would also contain time-tracked parts with specific serial numbers which would precisely identify the aircraft that struck the tower.  All of these aircraft parts were collected by the F.B.I., which was under the command of Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General…  ...who authorized for the aircraft evidence to be taken to the dump at Fresh Kills…  ...where they were treated like garbage – not as crucial primary evidence from the scene of a mass murder. Why would Michael Chertoff, an Israeli national and the son of an Israeli Mossad agent, allow such critical criminal evidence to be treated like garbage? Why wasn’t this engine taken to a high-tech FBI crime scene lab (like we see on television) and its time-tracked parts compared with the maintenance records for the planes said to have been involved? There is only one logical answer to these questions: the aircraft parts were not examined and shown to the public because they are not from the planes that are said to have hit the Twin Towers. The FBI and U.S. military only solve such crimes on TV shows, not in real life. That’s part of the deception. Question: Thanks for your sincere response. I greatly respect and sympathize with you. I don’t know how Americans, and people of other countries around the world, have lost their ability to think critically. Even among my own family, they are focused on college football, pro golf, or some other distraction. The phony “right wing” commentators like Glenn Beck, et al, don’t help either… As for your case, and the “criminal” case brought against you, the most amazing thing is that other journalists do not come to your aid. The same can be said of firefighters re: 911, why don’t they organize and make demands for a new investigation!!?! Pilots too. Sometimes it really makes me re-think my own beliefs. Bollyn Responds: The way my case was handled by the media in the United States speaks volumes about the controlled press. I was, after all, known to be a working journalist when a three-man squad of undercover police broke my arm and tortured me with a TASER me at my home – in front of my daughter – in August 2006.  Shocked and saddened – Christopher Bollyn with his children in Schaumburg after the police assault. Bollyn’s 8-year-old daughter had seen three heavily-armed undercover police torture her father with a TASER as they held him down in handcuffs after an unprovoked assault that left him with a broken elbow. Bollyn was subsequently charged with attacking the unidentified armed men who had invaded his home and threatened his family. But, of course. The fact that I was a journalist (for more than six years) with a national newspaper based in Washington, D.C. was carefully omitted in all the media reports about the bizarre and brutal police incident. I was sometimes referred to as a “blogger” – but never as a journalist. This is because the controlled media has always sought to marginalize my work. The fact that I had been interviewed – as a journalist - by FOX News and the BBC in London, and spoken about 9/11 in the capital cities of Europe and the United States meant nothing to the Chicago Tribune and the local paper, the Daily Herald. This was, of course, no simple oversight. These papers know very well who I am. I had been a candidate for mayor in Hoffman Estates in 2001. I have corresponded with these papers for years and was interviewed by an editorial board of two journalists and an editor in the offices of the Daily Herald prior to the special election in 2001. After the police attack at my house, the Chicago Tribune even hired an outside ghost writer from TIME magazine in order to smear me properly. There are two main reasons for the controlled media’s slanted reporting of my case: Firstly, to marginalize my 9/11 research and writing, and secondly, to minimize the signficance of the undercover police action against me at my home (i.e. on my property). It certainly doesn’t look right (or very American) for three heavily-armed undercover police to TASER and break the arm of an American journalist working to find the truth about what really happened on September 11, 2001 – in front of his 8-year-old daughter and wife. The truth could not be told in my case. It’s that simple. The nine-month process in the Cook County Court was equally bizarre and corrupt. Your comments about American media distractions are very apt. As a child, I grew up in a house with no television. The only TV shows I saw were those I watched at a neighbor’s house. I remember watching “Bozo’s Circus” and “The Mickey Mouse Club”. My favorite shows were “The Adventures of Superman” and “The Rifleman” with Chuck Connors.  Chuck Connors as “The Rifleman” These shows were all basic morality plays in which the good guys fought against corruption, crime, and evil – and always won. Because we did not have a TV, my time spent watching television was very limited in comparison to my friends. My mother told us that the average American child watched something like six hours a day, something I found incredible. But Americans really do spend many hours consuming television on a daily basis, most of which is nothing but staged fantasy and propaganda posing as news. This is a huge problem because television shapes and informs the sense of reality for most Americans and what they watch these days isn’t nearly as good as “The Rifleman” was. The same holds true for the demise of American music. When I was young the music we identified with was generally much more optimistic than what kids hear these days.
|
