The Less Than Amazing Randi - Critic of 9-11 Truth is Funded by Military Contractors
February 4, 2014
The James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) is funded by a high-level agent of the U.S. military industrial complex. The Randi "educational" foundation's financial connection to major U.S. military contractors explains why the JREF is so hostile to 9-11 truth. The JREF is actually headquartered in the same building as General Dynamics - at 2941 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 105, Falls Church, Virginia.
A LIAR AND A CHEAT - Who is this depraved man and why is he supporting the official lies about what happened on 9-11?
WHO IS RANDI JAMES AND WHY IS HE OPPOSED TO 9-11 TRUTH?
"The Amazing Randi", (a.k.a. James Randi, born Randall James Hamilton Zwinge, August 7, 1928) is a Canadian-American stage magician and scientific skeptic, according to Wikipedia, "best known for his challenges to paranormal claims and pseudoscience."
Randi is also the founder of the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF), which is supposedly engaged in investigating paranormal, occult, and supernatural claims. Often called a "debunker", Randi prefers to describe himself as an "investigator."
THE BANNER OF DEPRAVED LIARS - The JREF forum spends a great deal of time attacking me with slanderous comments meant to discredit me and my 9-11 research. The comments are all written in proper English with correct punctuation, a good indication that the writers are professional disinfo agents.
One thing the JREF seems to specialize in is attacking the 9-11 truth movement and honest investigators like myself. I recently came across a discussion forum from the JREF website where the anonymous posters who are members of the JREF forum discuss me in a way that is clearly designed to smear my name and discredit my research. The heading for this discussion is "Why isn't Chris Bollyn a huge story in the conspiracy world?"
The final comment by "Triterope", the poster who began the discussion, begins with these unkind words, which reveal how he really feels about me and my 9-11 research:
I know I shouldn't care about Chris Bollyn's drivel, but stuff like this makes me want to puke every time I read it:
Originally Posted by Christopher Bollyn In a letter to Paul P. Moreschi, my second legal counsel, Dr. Shelton wrote: "Now I understand why Helje (Mrs. Bollyn) stated to me she is more afraid of living in this country now than she was under Soviet occupation of Estonia. Seeing your husband viciously attacked by undercover police without warning on your own property, then hearing them make false statements on the stand, seeing them falsify their records, hearing the prosecutor fabricating defamatory baseless statements, and then the judge and jury believing this story, would do this to you."
You know what, Chris? If America is worse than life in a Soviet satellite republic, LEAVE. Get the hell out of this country...
What I have found in more than 12 years of 9-11 research is that most people are supportive of truth-seekers like myself who have spent years of their lives investigating what really happened on 9-11. The only people who spend their time attacking and slandering me like "Triterope" are paid disinfo agents. To support the official lies about the mass murder and terrorism of 9-11 is utterly depraved and evil. People like "Triterope" and James Randi have sold their souls to the master of deception.
In the following video, "Interview with James Randi on 9-11," Randi criticizes 9-11 truth seekers and claims to be an expert in deception. "As a magician, I know about deception. I know two things with great certainty: how people are fooled, and more importantly, how they fool themselves. And that is my expertise." His scathing criticism of 9-11 truth seekers, which he describes as crazy, stupid, and silly, and his support for the unproven official version of what caused the Twin Towers to fall strongly suggest that he is being paid to promote the government lies about 9-11.
To understand the relationship between James Randi and military contractors like General Dynamics, we need to look at how his foundation was created and where it is based. The following is from the Wikipedia article on the JREF:
The JREF officially came into existence on February 29, 1996, when it was registered as a nonprofit corporation in the State of Delaware in the United States. On April 3, 1996 Randi formally announced the creation of the JREF through his email hotline:
“THE FOUNDATION IS IN BUSINESS! It is my great pleasure to announce the creation of the James Randi Educational Foundation. This is a non-profit, tax-exempt, educational foundation under Section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code, incorporated in the State of Delaware. The Foundation is generously funded by a sponsor in Washington D.C. who wishes, at this point in time, to remain anonymous. ” — The Foundation, Randi Hotline, Wed, April 3, 1996
We now know that the millionaire sponsor of the JREF is Richard L. Adams Jr., the former computer programmer for SAIC and DARPA's Center for Seismic Studies. Adams started as a programmer for San Diego-based Science Application International Corp. (SAIC) and went on to a position as a data-gathering specialist with the Center for Seismic Studies, an outfit hired by the U.S. Department of Defense to develop technology for nuclear testing violation detection.
Adams is famous for his role in developing UUNet, a backbone of the Internet, which was bought in 1996 by MFS Communications, formerly Kiewit Communications, which was then bought by MCI, which then went out of business in a huge bankruptcy case. MFS Communications began in 1988 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Kiewit Diversified Group Inc., which in turn was a wholly owned subsidiary of Peter Kiewit Sons' Inc., one of the largest construction and mining companies in the United States. The Kiewit family of Omaha does a great deal of business with the U.S. military.
Adams took UUNet public in 1995, and a year later agreed to a $2 billion buyout offer from MFS Communications, which was acquired by WorldCom shortly thereafter. An instant millionaire from the sale of UUNet, in 1996, Rick Adams donated one million dollars to the James Randi Educational Foundation and he has served as the treasurer of the tax-exempt "educational" foundation ever since.
Richard L. Adams Jr. is the millionaire sponsor of the JREF. He is also the landlord of General Dynamics corporate headquarters, which is his main tenant and occupies half of his building.
The JREF is located in Suite 105 of the 2941 Fairview Park Drive building, which is the business office of Rick Adams' 2941 Fairview Park Drive, LLC, who is the legal owner of the building. Adams' biggest tenant is General Dynamics, whose corporate headquarters leases half the building and has their main office just down the hall from Adams' office - in Suite 100.
The JREF tax filing for 2012 shows Rick Adams as unpaid treasurer of the foundation. Why would a millionaire businessman give his time and name to a bogus educational foundation run by a former stage magician who is strongly opposed to 9-11 truth?
The James Randi Educational Foundation, Inc. is registered at 2941Fairview Park Drive, in Suite 105. This is also the registered address of the owner of the building, 2941 Fairview Park Drive, LLC, as well as several other companies associated with Rick Adams: 2900 Fairview Park Drive, LLC; 2941 Fairview, LLC; 2941, LLC; Fairview Property Development, LLC; Jose Alvarez Art Studio, LLC; and Northeast Quadrant Owners Association.
As the Washington real estate news website Bisnow.com reported in 2008, "We had lunch last week with David Orr at that great 2941 restaurant in Fairview Park, and he seemed to know everyone who passed. Maybe that's because he built the building five years ago and even negotiated General Dynamics' 15-year lease for half the 390k SF space... Dave built the 2941 building for UUNet founder Rick Adams in 2001: a $36M building on spec, part of 1.5M buildable SF Adams bought in Fairview Park."
Rick Adams' 2941 Fairview Park Drive building is corporate headquarters for General Dynamics, a leading defense contractor controlled by the Crown family of Chicago. General Dynamics and the Crown family have a vested interest in supporting the lies about 9-11: they profit greatly from the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan and the fraudulent "War on Terror." To understand the Crown family's relationship to the 9-11 cover-up, I recommend reading my article,"JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time".
I called Rick Adams to ask about his relationship with the JREF but he refused to discuss it and hung up the phone. I also called Daniel W. Denman, who works as a Director in the Division of Information Technology at the University of Maryland, but he also refused to discuss his role as a director and unpaid secretary of the JREF. These men have a good reason for not wanting to discuss their work with the James Randi Educational Foundation with me - they know that they are involved in a very evil project to deceive the public about what really happened on 9-11. To be involved in such an evil deception should make them wonder what they value in this life.
Daniel W. Denman at his day-job at the University of Maryland.
"Why isn't Chris Bollyn a huge story in the conspiracy world?" forum discussion started by Triterope, James Randi Educational Foundation forum, under 9/11 Conspiracy Theories, June 26, 2007 18.104.22.168/showthread.php
Articles by Christopher Bollyn about the Crown family and General Dynamics:
Noam Chomsky, who has a large following, has stated that he does not think there has been a cover-up of what really happened on 9-11. The real question is WHY does Chomsky refuse to acknowledge the obvious evidence of a massive cover-up? Is it fear, tribal loyalty, or his long-standing connections to MIT and the Tavistock Institute of Britain?
THE ISRAELI CEO OF TAVISTOCK - The Tavistock Institute, funded by the royal family, the Rockefellers, and the Rothschilds, pioneered the techniques of propaganda used to justify war. The CEO of Tavistock is an Israeli woman named Eliat Aram.
Having seen Noam Chomsky commenting on 9-11, I knew that he denies that there has been a cover-up of the truth. When I saw his plug for Peter Dale Scott's book on 9-11 and the war conspiracy, I decided to ask him directly about the 9-11 cover-up. The following is my recent correspondence with Chomsky:
From: Christopher Bollyn Sent: December 26, 2013
To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Question about 9-11 Cover-up
Dear Professor Chomsky,
I have been reading Peter Dale Scott's book The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War (2008). At the very top of the book's front cover (see attached photo) is the following plug attributed to you:
Peter Dale Scott's 2008 book about 9-11 and the war conspiracy with Chomsky's plug at the top of the front cover
"Scott exposes an element in the American system of global power that poses an increasing threat to the victims of this system, the American people among them." - Noam Chomsky
In the book Professor Scott clearly states that he has "certain knowledge" that there has been a massive and on-going cover-up of what really happened on 9-11:
"I should make clear that, with respect to 9/11, I have certain knowledge of only one fact: that there has been and continues to be a massive cover-up." - The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War, p. 367
Since your name is at the top of the book I would assume that you support what Professor Scott says, that "with respect to 9/11," he has certain knowledge that "there has been and continues to be a massive cover-up."
Do you agree that there has been a massive and on-going cover-up of the truth of 9-11?
Thank you for your consideration of my question.
Here is Chomsky’s response to my question:
From: Noam Chomsky Date: Dec 26 at 4:12 PM To: Christopher Bollyn
This book appeared in 1972, and my comment refers to that edition. I haven’t seen anything more recent, including this edition. As for the practice of using a comment on the 1972 edition for this one, I leave it for you to judge.
I have no idea what Scott’s “certain knowledge” is, but it’s fair to assume that some things are being covered up, since that’s true about 100% of the time, not just in the US. The question is whether it’s anything significant.
Avram Noam Chomsky and his wife Carol in 1949
The Chomskys went to London from Montreal on a ship in early June 1953. They arrived in England on June 6, 1953...
...and returned to the USA in late September 1953. It was probably during these three-and-a-half months that they spent 6 weeks on a kibbutz in Israel. This is probably the time when Chomsky was recruited to work for the Tavistock Institute, Britain's Zionist propaganda agency.
Greg Palast on the Alex Jones Show. The critical viewer will ask, "How does Alex Jones fund the operation of his network?" It doesn't run on donations, that's for sure. One has to remember that the alternative media is just as tightly controlled as the mainstream media.
GREG PALAST ON INN WITH LENNY CHARLES - I can't look at all these, but controlled demolition I can rule out. I'm sorry, we just, it just... rules out… I haven't seen any engineer... it takes two years to wire a building for controlled demolition, and that's an awful lot of people. You'd have to snuff a lot of people... I mean, that's another theory, if you're gonna take out the buildings, you're not gonna do it with dynamite. It's just not gonna happen. And there's zero evidence, I mean there's absolutely stone cold nothing-nothing there. I'm sorry, Lenny, but that's what I gotta tell ya… No, no, no, no, no. There's no scientist. There’s no engineer! You can have ballroom dancers, you can have great actors, you can have poets, you can have physicists, there's a guy, Dr. Jones, his last big theory was that Jesus met with the Mayans after the resurrection. He's a complete fruitcake, and a complete, utter fraud. Mr. Jones, come at me. - Greg Palast, INN interview, May, 2007 http://youtube.com/watch?v=r2oFTiEpIBQ
Who is Greg Palast and why is he attacking Professor Jones?
THE MOLTEN METAL OF 9-11
In August 2002, I discovered that molten metal had been found - in the molten state - in the basements of the three collapsed towers. I obtained this information from two of the men who supervised the removal of the rubble from the destroyed World Trade Center.
In the basements of the collapsed twin towers, where each of their 47 support core columns were connected to the bedrock, hot spots of "literally molten steel" were discovered more than a month after the collapse. "Such persistent and intense residual heat, 70 feet below the surface, could explain how these crucial structural supports failed," I wrote at the time.
While some readers suggested at the time that Thermite was probably the cause of the molten metal, it was not until the fall of 2005, when Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University began to study and discuss the evidence from the WTC that the important questions surrounding Thermite and the molten metal seen at the WTC reached a larger audience. Jones concluded that the evidence indicates that the molten iron seen before and after the collapses was probably produced by alumino-thermic reactions involving Thermite or Thermate.
I met with Professor Jones several times at the BYU campus during the spring of 2006 and visited Professor Thomas Cahill at the University of California at Davis between my visits to Provo. The data that these two professors have gathered corroborate the theory that large amounts of Thermite were used in the demolition of the three towers of the World Trade Center.
Shortly after I wrote a series of articles about the evidence of Thermite at the WTC during the summer of 2006, I was brutally attacked by three undercover cops who broke my right elbow and TASERed me in front of my wife and 8-year-old daughter. I was then maliciously prosecuted for aggravated assault and resisting a police officer. Despite an abundance of evidence that the Hoffman Estates police conspired to assault me before they arrived at my house and the fact that the police had destroyed their videos of the assault, I was found guilty of both charges. As I had been warned about the legal process in America, the side that gets the most evidence excluded wins. So it was.
Three weeks later, Professor Jones was the victim of a trap set for him on the NPR radio affiliate at the University of Utah:
On September 5, Doug Fabrizio, executive producer of RadioWest on the University of Utah's public radio station invited Jones to come on his one-hour program to discuss his 9/11 research.
After interviewing Jones for a brief 20 minutes, Fabrizio said goodbye to Jones and turned the remainder of the hour over to a discussion of conspiracy theories with two Jewish professors, a Robert Goldberg from the University of Utah and Gary Fine from Northwestern.
The first caller was a William Tumpowsky, chairman of the Jewish Community Relations Council and board member of the local Israeli-fund raising organization, the United Jewish Federation. Tumpowsky charged that Jones' was using code language to make anti-Semitic allegations. Goldberg supported this accusation.
Starting from this outrageous allegation, Fabrizio continued the hostile discussion with Goldberg and Fine, with frequent allegations that the now-absent physics professor was nothing more than an anti-Semite indulging in conspiracy fantasies. The most significant evidence brought forth by Jones' research was not even discussed.
Within two days, the authorities at BYU apparently caved to organized Jewish pressure and put Jones on paid leave.
Despite the fact that Professor Jones' research is extremely solid and is highly regarded among scientists, an independent journalist named Greg Palast, who has no known scientific credentials, recently called him a "fruitcake" and a "fraud."
"Dr. Jones is a complete fruitcake and a complete and utter fraud," Palast said in a May 2007 interview with Lenny Charles of International News Net (INN). Then, turning to the camera, Palast said, "Mr. Jones, come at me."
Palast also said that his investigation had concluded that there was "zero evidence" that the towers had been demolished with explosives or Thermite.
A web-writer known as Smoking Mirrors (SM) posted an article entitled "Greg Palast Takes a Dive in The Midnight Hour" about Palast's attack on Jones. Palast, he wrote, "presents himself as an investigative reporter. He’s been a counter-culture hero of sorts who likes to picture himself as a Sam Spade in fedora sort of a guy who tenaciously digs to the real facts when the smoke machines and the light show hit the stage.
"It appears that Greg Palast is not who he presents himself to be," he concluded. "It appears, from my view, that he is a disinfo specialist."
The article concluded that Palast "has put himself solidly on the side of untruth with his name-calling dismissal of Dr. Steven Jones.
"For some reason, Greg Palast thinks that Dr. Steven Jones is a fruitcake for questioning the official 9/11 story and for subjecting the official explanation of how and why the 3 WTC Towers fell to the disciplines of the science in which he is widely considered to be an expert," SM wrote.
"A child in primary school knows that 3 +2 does not add up to four. Greg Palast indicates that he does not know this in respect of the bad math in the official 9/11 story, yet… we are led to believe that Greg Palast is a truth seeker and an intelligent man.
"What is the explanation for Greg’s position in defiance of hard, empirical science, mathematical law and common sense? It can’t be that he doesn’t know. That’s as absurd as his rejection of what is obvious to an ordinary layman. So why… why does he defend the official story?" SM asks.
"Can Greg Palast be as stupid as his position makes him out to be?" he asks. "Something is wrong with this picture. What might that be?"
A ZIONIST APOLOGIST
I met Mr. Palast at a vote fraud event in Columbus, Ohio, after the 2004 elections. I would agree with Smoking Mirrors description. Palast struck me as more of a performer than an investigative journalist. He never took off his hat indoors and impolitely took over our table where we were selling Eric Hufschmid's book, Painful Questions. Palast's biggest interest was clearly himself and selling his books.
His analysis and discussion of the voting problems in the 2004 election was off the mark, in my opinion. He focused on disenfranchised black voters in Florida while my main concern is the disenfranchisement of the entire electorate via electronic and computer vote fraud.
A year later, Palast came to my attention when he penned a badly-written article entitled "Was the Invasion of Iraq a Jewish Conspiracy" for the Jewish periodical Tikkun. Although Palast's logic and writing are weak, he comes on strongly as a Zionist apologist.
"There are kooks and cranks and conspiracy nuts out there who think George Bush, from the moment he took office, had some kind of secret plan to invade Iraq and grab control of its oil. They’re wrong," Palast wrote. Yet Palast ignores and belittles the Zionist-written Project for a New American Century (PNAC) document from September 2000, "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century," which specifically calls for the U.S. military to become engaged in Iraq.
"Did the Jews do it?," Palast continued. "I mean, after killing Jesus, did the Elders of Zion manipulate the government of the United States into invading Babylon as part of a scheme to abet the expansion of Greater Israel?"
Yes, they did.
This is at least how millions of people around the world would answer Palast's question. Yet Palast wrote that he did not even consider this possibility until someone asked him about it in 2004. Palast is admitting that the war of aggression against Iraq had already waged for a year before he even thought about who was behind it. He certainly is not the quickest of investigative journalists.
He never even addresses the PNAC document directly, but writes that he obtained a confidential 101-page document "in February 2001, just before the tanks rolled." What document and what rolling tanks Palast is referring to are as vague as his entire article.
I was most intrigued by his desperate attempt to divert attention from the Zionist role in planning and fomenting the war in Iraq. He was writing for the Jewish intellectual audience that reads Tikkun, after all, so I decided to look into who Mr. Palast is and where he comes from.
PALAST'S ZIONIST ROOTS
Greg Palast is the product of a Chicago-based Russian Yiddish immigrant family which married into an immigrant Hungarian Jewish family. Gregory is the 55-year-old son of Gilbert (Gil) L. Palast and Gladys E. (nee Kaufman) Palast from Chicago. He is married to Linda Levy and has two children. The family lives in lower Manhattan. His sister, Geri, was an Asst. Secretary of Labor during the Clinton administration. Greg grew up in southern California and earned his business degrees, including an MBA (1976), under Milton Friedman at the University of Chicago. His parents still live in San Diego. He contributes to the British press, the well-known left-leaning outlets who adamantly refuse to look at the evidence from 9-11.
According to a 1984 article in the San Diego Evening Tribune, his mother is a political activist who "learned about political organizing on the northwest side of Chicago." She may have been born in Hungary because the article says her "Jewish immigrant" parents "fled Hungary before World War II." The dates don't compute, however, unless "before" means 20 years before, because Gladys E. Kaufman married Gil, her "childhood sweetheart" from Chicago, in 1943. One will notice that the dates and facts in articles by and about the Palasts are somewhat elastic.
For example, Greg Palast says that he had an office in the North Tower of the World Trade Center. In an article he wrote on September 23, 2001, he says his office was on the 50th floor of the North Tower. More recently he said it was on the 52nd floor, yet in the 2001 article he says that his friend Greg O'Neill had an office on the 52nd floor and that his was on the 50th. Documents about the tenants of the North Tower indicate that the 50th floor of the WTC 1 was occupied by the Dai-Ichi Kangyo Trust Co. (DKB). Did Palast have an office with the Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank?
Gladys E. Kaufman, his Hungarian Jewish mother, was the daughter of Alex Kaufman of West Armitage Avenue. Mr. Kaufman delivered milk using a horse and buggy, according to the 1984 article. In 1941, a milkman named Alex Kaufman of 3015 Hermitage Avenue was involved in a fatal accident in which a 15-year-old boy was run over by the rear wheels of his "milk truck". This may be the same Alex Kaufman.
Greg Palast's grandfather, on his father's side, was Norman Palast. There is very little written in the Chicago papers about Norman Palast. He was one of the sons of Esther Necha Palast along with Nathan, Max, and Joseph. He also had a sister named Clara (Mamet).
Nathan was apparently the oldest and was born in a Yiddish-speaking area of Russia about 1885. In 1910, the 25-year-old Nathan was a boarder with a Jewish family named Greenberg on W. 14th Place in Chicago. There is no mention of Esther's husband Leo. Nathan may have come to America first and sponsored the rest of the family to come from wherever they originated in Yiddish Russia. There is no other record of this Palast family in the Chicago census records from 1920 although my ability to research is limited.
Nathan Palast, Greg's great uncle, went on to become a "Jewish leader" and was president of the orthodox Agudath Achim synagogue on Chicago's South Shore from 1940 to 1949. This may be one of the reasons Greg Palast always wears a fedora. Nathan was made honorary life president of the synagogue.
Nathan was a leader in the Israel bond drive, active in the Combined Jewish appeal, the Jewish federation, B'nai B'rith, and the Hebrew Theological college, according to a Chicago Daily Tribune article from December 14, 1958. The elder Palast was honored at an Israel Bond Dinner at the synagogue he built at 7929 Yates Avenue. B'nai B'rith is the secret Jewish organization that founded the Zionist defense organization known as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in Chicago during World War I.
Chicago is a Zionist hotspot and Greg Palast is the son of one of Chicago's leading Zionist families. This is why he is so dedicated to diverting attention from the evidence of the Zionist involvement in 9-11. This is also why he desperately tries to excuse the Zionist role in the "War on Terror" and put the blame for the disastrous war in Iraq elsewhere. This is probably why he diverts attention from the real problems with elections in the United States. He is a Zionist gate-keeper of the left.
How Greg Palast sees the world: I don't see any evidence of Israeli or Zionist involvement in 9-11 or Iraq. I don't see any evidence of controlled demolition, Thermite, or explosives at the World Trade Center.
Greg Palast is Related to Mossad Chief David Kimche
October 7, 2013
Update: Israeli spymaster and Mossad chief David Kimche is a first cousin with Greg Palast's father. So, what does that make Greg Palast? An honest reporter? The fact that Greg Palast has hidden his family ties to Israeli intelligence suggests that he is working for them. Why else would he hide this relevant relationship. It certainly does not look good for Greg Palast. Don't Palast readers deserve to know about his ties to the Mossad?
Greg: You should write a tell-all book with a title like My Life as a Disinfo Agent for the Mossad. Hey, it would sell big -- but you might have to move to Israel.
GREG PALAST markets himself as an "investigative journalist" but he always misses the Israeli elephant in the room. Could it be because his father's cousin was David Kimche, a "founding father" of Israel's intelligence agency - the Mossad?
MOSSAD CHIEF DAVID KIMCHE WITH BIBI NETANYAHU - Greg's father Gilbert is a first cousin of David Kimche (right), a founding father of the Mossad who was deeply involved in Iran-Contra and other Israeli state crimes until he died in March 2010. As a former head of the Mossad, Kimche would have had a pretty good idea about the Israeli connections to 9-11, something Greg denies knowing anything about.
Palast is notorious for ignoring the most obvious evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 - or the war in Iraq. He even went so far to say that there is no evidence of controlled demolition or explosives at the World Trade Center. Could his relationship to Israeli intelligence be the real reason he fails to see the obvious in these huge crimes? Palast refused to answer my questions about his relationship to the former deputy director of the Mossad - but the public deserves an explanation of his family ties to Israeli intelligence.
WHAT CHUTZPAH - Palast rudely accused Dr. Steven E. Jones of being an "utter fraud" on INN with Lenny Charles, while his hides the fact that he is related to the "founding father" of the Mossad. Why would he hide that, if he is a honest "man of the people" reporter?
Is Greg Palast a disinformation agent working for the Mossad? Why would a person tied to Israeli intelligence refuse to see the obvious evidence of explosive demolitions at the World Trade Center on 9-11? Why does Israeli intelligence attack honest 9-11 researchers like Dr. Jones and myself? What does this tell us about the Israeli role in 9-11?
GERI PALAST - Greg's older sister is another Zionist agent working for the state of Israel. Geri is the managing director of the Israel Action Network, "a strategic initiative of The Jewish Federations of North America." She is responsible for the operations of the IAN and works to promote the image of the state of Israel. Her Mossad connections are an important part of her work.
DAVID KIMCHE, the British-born Israeli spymaster and deputy director of the Mossad, is the son of Sara Palast, Greg Palast's great-aunt and his father's aunt. This means that David Kimche and Greg's father are first cousins. In 1987 theNew York Times described Kimche as "the former director general of the Israeli Foreign Ministry and now a private arms dealer" - when Kimche was served with a summons to testify before a federal grand jury about his role in the Iran-Contra affair. Kimche played a key role in the inception of the Reagan Administration's secret arms sales to Iran.
MOTHER OF THE MOSSAD - Sara Palast Kimche with her first five children (ca 1917). David, born in 1928, was her last child.
Greg Palast is an American journalist who rudely accused Professor Steven E. Jones, the scientist who discovered nano-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center of being "a complete fruitcake, and a complete, utter fraud" on INN with Lenny Charles in 2007.
I wrote an article about Greg Palast in August 2007 in which I revealed his Zionist roots from Poland and Chicago. Having looked a bit more into the Palast family history, I found that Greg Palast is closely related to David Kimche, the late Israeli spymaster and deputy director of the Mossad -- Greg's father and David Kimche are first cousins.
David Kimche in 1983
When Kimche died in March 2010, his obituary in Ha'aretz read:
Kimche joined the Mossad spy agency in the early 1950s, and was in essence one of the organization's founding fathers, among those who designed its doctrine and modus operandi. He was involved in just about every aspect of the Mossad over the course of his service, eventually reaching the position of deputy head of Mossad.
The fact that Palast is related to one of the founding fathers of Israeli intelligence might explain his refusal to see the obvious Israeli connections to 9-11, electronic vote fraud, and other mega-crimes. This raises the obvious question: Is Greg Palast working for the Mossad?
To get Palast's side of the story I looked him up in the White Pages and called his number. A woman named Leni [von Eckardt] answered the phone. I told her I was working on an article about the relationship between Greg Palast and David Kimche, the famous chief of the Mossad. Leni was quick to confirm that they are related. She gave me Greg Palast's mobile number so I called him to ask about the details. He refused to answer any questions about his family relationship to David Kimche and pretended to be offended that I was asking such questions.
Palast's girlfriend Leni von Eckardt told me that he is related to David Kimche. Source: Leni von Eckardt on Facebook
The relationship between Greg Palast and David Kimche is quite close and also explains Palast's close connection to Britain and the Zionist establishment of London. David Kimche was born in London on February 14, 1928. Kimche's mother was Polish-born Sara Palast, who married Moses Kimche from Grodno (then Poland). Sara was the daughter of Theodore Palast and Sonia Celmaister, and had many siblings: Nathan, Norman, Dora, Max, and Morris.
Sara's brother Morris (a.k.a. Moritz or Maurice, born in Poland, 1897) came to Chicago and listed Norman Palast of 1056 Oakley Blvd. as his nearest relative when he registered for World War I. Norman Palast is Greg Palast's paternal grandfather, i.e. the father of his father, Gilbert Leon Palast. The following documents indicate that Greg Palast's father, Gilbert, is a cousin of the former deputy director of the Mossad. The fact that Greg Palast is related to a former director of the Mossad is a troubling relationship that demands an explanation.
Greg Palast's father was born to Norman and Anna Palast in Chicago, in 1921.
Greg Palast's grandfather Norman (a.k.a. Nathan) Palast was born in Poland on January 26, 1888.
Greg's grandfather Nathan immigrated to the U.S. on October 31, 1913
and gave 151 Minories, London, as his address of origin
and his brother Max in Chicago as his destination in the U.S.
and his birthplace as Hrubieszow (Poland).
151 Minories was the London home of Sonia and Theodore Palast, where Sara Palast lived before she Moses Kimche in 1908. This indicates that Sara Palast is a sister of Greg Palast's grandfather Nathan (Norman), which makes his father a cousin of David Kimche.
Norman Palast lived at 1056 N. Oakley in Chicago in 1917, when he registered for the war.
Maurice Palast listed Nate Palast of 1056 N. Oakley Blvd. as his nearest relative.
Another Nathan Palast also lived at 1056 N. Oakley, which may be a brother or cousin of Norman (Nathan) Palast.
When Maurice Palast became a citizen in 1927 he lived a few doors away from Greg's grandfather.
Morris (a.k.a. Moritz, Maurice) Palast
Maurice Palast married Gertrud Newman of Cleveland in 1926. He is buried in Cleveland.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Ancestry.com for records on the Palast and Kimche families
What The Media Isn’t Telling You About The Syrian Chemical Attack
Updated September 5, 2013
Added material from interview with Bashar al Assad by Le Figaro:
Le Figaro: Mr. President, the Americans and the French have accused you of perpetrating a chemical attack on the 21st of August in Ghouta, which led to the death of hundreds. Do you have evidence to suggest that your army did not launch the attack?
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad: First of all, anyone making such an accusation is also responsible for providing the evidence to substantiate the allegation. We have challenged them to present a shred of legitimate evidence, which they have not been able to do. Since their foreign policy should be tailored to suit the interests of their own people, we have challenged them to present legitimate evidence to their own public opinion to substantiate their claims; again they have not done so.
The statements by the American administration, the West and other countries were made with disdain and blatant disrespect of their own public opinion; there isn’t a body in the world, let alone a superpower, that makes an accusation and then goes about collecting evidence to prove its point. The American administration made the accusation on Wednesday and two days later announced that they would start to collect the evidence - what evidence is it going to gather from afar?
...It is now crystal clear to everybody that what is happening in Syria is not a popular revolution pushing for political reform, but targeted terrorism aimed at destroying the Syrian state. What will they say to their people when pushing for military intervention: we are intervening in Syria to support terrorism against the state? - Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to Izvestia, VoltaireNet.org, August 26, 2013
"If they don't have proof or evidence, then how are they going to stand up to the American public opinion and to the world public opinion and explain why they are attacking Syria?" - Omran Zoabi, Syrian Information Minister to CNN, August 27, 2013
Omran Ahed Zoabi, the Syrian information minister, was interviewed by France 24 about the alleged poison gas attack in a Damascus suburb. In the interview Zoabi reaffirms that the Syrian government is not responsible for the massacre. He discusses the UN inspectors' mission and deplores the way the Syrian crisis is being treated in the Western media. In the United States, for example, one rarely sees or hears anything from the Syrian government while the media parrots the statements and claims made by the so-called rebels, many of whom are not even Syrian.
In an interview with CNN, Zoabi challenged the United States to present its proof to the rest of the world that the Assad regime was responsible for having used chemical weapons. "If they don't have proof or evidence, then how are they going to stand up to the American public opinion and to the world public opinion and explain why they are attacking Syria?" Zoabi said.
In January 2013 there were reports in the media that the Obama administration supported the idea of using a false-flag attack with chemical weapons to be blamed on the Assad regime in Damascus.
The U.S. government supported using a false-flag chemical attack in Syria to be blamed on the Assad regime, according to this January 29 article. The article (now removed) begins: Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.
"Leaked Documents: US Framed Syria in Chemical Weapons Attack" presents documents and evidence to support its case that the rebels, not the Assad regime, are responsible for the use of chemical weapons in Syria. Video URL - youtu.be/gTUcvKO3js8
Since the reported chemical attack last Wednesday, the Obama administration and members of Congress have been pushing the line that Syria’s President Bashar al Assad ordered the use of a chemical weapon on the outskits of Damascus.
According to CNN, one U.S. officials claims “There is nothing credible to indicate that the rebels, either the Syrian National Council or even al-Nusra Front, have used chemical weapons,” the official said. “Only the Assad regime is responsible for chemical weapons use.”
But that statement is false. When it comes to this latest incident, at this point we don’t know what kind of chemical might have been used. Nor do we know who used it. Some of the claims early on from “unnamed government sources” were that sarin gas was used in that Damascus suburb. The use of sarin gas would point toward the Assad regime, would it not?
Not necessarily. What our national media isn’t telling you is that in May Turkish security forces found a 2kg cylinder with sarin gas after searching the homes of Syrian militants from the Al-Qaeda linked Al-Nusra Front. Where did the sarin gas come from? We don’t know. But clearly, Al Nusra Front has access to sarin gas and was planning a use for it.
The complete article and video (above) by Ben Swann are highly recommended as are the pieces listed below.
Added video clip about TWA Flight 800 from Shadows of Liberty and removed dead link to TWA Flight 800 video
"I know what I saw. I saw an ordnance explosion. And whatever I saw, the explosion of the fuel was not the initiator of the event. It was one of the results. Something happened before that which was the initiator of the disaster.'' - Major Frederick C. Meyer, Air National Guard helicopter pilot who witnessed the explosion of TWA Flight 800, “Eyewitness Views of Flight 800”, TWA800.com
This graphic depicts what ANG pilot Major Frederick Meyer saw when TWA 800 was hit.
"TWA Flight 800 was a watershed moment for this country." - Tom Stalcup, producer of TWA Flight 800
A new film about TWA Flight 800 reveals that the plane was shot down - hit by missiles fired from the sea, just as hundreds of eyewitnesses said.
David Louis Mayer III of the NTSB has a Ph.D. in Experimental Psychology from Rice University. Mayer handled the eyewitness accounts, which he said could not be trusted. It was suggested by the NTSB panel that based on the fact that the incident occurred on a warm summer evening, one should consider the possibility that all of the eyewitnesses were drunk and had hallucinated seeing a missile. I attended the final NTSB hearing and thought that David Mayer's outrageous dismissal of eyewitness testimonies was a huge red flag. The Stalcup film states that Mayer was seen tampering with the evidence in the hanger, which should be considered a crime. David L. Mayer is now the managing director of the NTSB.
Tom Stalcup surveys the wreckage of TWA Flight 800. Stalcup's forthcoming film about the downing of Flight 800 reveals that the FBI, CIA, and NTSB, all lied about what was really behind the 1996 crash off the coast of Long Island.
Tom Stalcup (right) with TWA 800 investigators - Stalcup's video reveals how the federal agencies that are supposed to investigate such incidents are actually involved in criminal cover-ups. The cover-ups of TWA Flight 800 and the 9-11 atrocity are connected.
A new documentary film by Tom Stalcup about TWA Flight 800 will be aired on July 17, 2013. The rough cut of the film, about 90 minutes long, was available for online viewing but is not now available. I have watched the video from beginning to end and found it to be excellent in every way. I highly recommend viewing this video when it is available or shown on television.
The following video clip from the 2012 film Shadows of Libertydescribes how Kristina Borjesson, the journalist who produced TWA Flight 800 with Thomas Stalcup, investigated the TWA Flight 800 saga for CBS News and how she was fired for getting too close to the truth.
I wrote the following article in August 2000 after attending the NTSB's two-day presentation of their conclusion about what caused the downing of TWA Flight 800. No questions were allowed.
This article presents the key points that indicated that the plane had been struck by an external explosion above its left wing (fuel tank). It should be noted that the NTSB did not prove their case that faulty wiring had caused the center fuel tank to explode, they simply concluded that. They can conclude whatever they want but if the cause is not proven there is no reason we should accept it, especially given the facts that the evidence indicates that missiles struck the plane and that the NTSB dismissed the testimonies of eyewitnesses who claimed to have seen missiles approaching and exploding near the plane.
Here is my article from August 2000. This article was printed in The Spotlight newspaper of Washington, D.C. of August 27, 2000:
The federal government's final ruling on the tragic downing of TWA Flight 800 has been called a sham and a farce by independent investigators and families of the victims.
By Christopher Bollyn
Federal investigators have dismissed wholesale at least 96 eyewitness accounts and concluded that the explosion that downed TWA Flight 800 off Long Island, killing all 230 on board, on July 17, 1996, was "most likely" caused by an electrical short circuit that ignited the fuel vapors in the center wing tank.
In a well-rehearsed and carefully staged two-day presentation of the draft of the accident report held in a converted movie theater Aug. 22-23, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) accepted the findings of Dr. Bernard Loeb and his staff, which simply discarded problematic eyewitness and radar evidence that contradicted its accident scenario. This concluded the longest and most expensive investigation of its kind, costing Boeing and the NTSB $67 million.
When The SPOTLIGHT asked NTSB investigator James Wildey if the presentation had been well rehearsed, he said "Sure, you don't think we would wing it with all those slides, do you?"
The investigation has been called "totally phony" by a veteran 747 pilot who wonders "why are they going to such extraordinary attempts to conceal the truth?"
Donald Nibert, whose daughter, Cheryl, was one of the 16 French club students from Montoursville, Pa., headed for Paris aboard TWA 800, said that he still "perceives a cover-up."
Nibert noted that the two-day NTSB hearings failed to mention even once that the Navy had "an armada of ships" assembled in the area where the plane went down and that concerning the presence of this unidentified naval task force, "we were lied to in the first week and I've seen this continue."
"I find it disturbing that three satellites covering this area at the time of the crash ... failed to function -- at the same time -- on the closest pass to the accident," Nibert said. "I find that hard to accept."
The NTSB began its hearings by attacking the independent investigators who have presented evidence that indicates that the streaking light that was reported by 96 eyewitnesses as rising from the surface and resulting in a fireball "four times larger than the sun," was a missile.
The NTSB insists that "the witness observations of a streak of light were not related to a missile -- and the streak of light reported by most of these witnesses was burning fuel from the accident airplane in crippled flight during some portion of the post-explosion pre-impact breakup sequence."
Dr. David Mayer, a non-engineer whose specialty is human psychology, who was recently hired by Loeb to deal with the problem of the more than 100 accounts that contradict the official accident scenario, dismissed the eyewitness evidence. Mayer called the eyewitness testimonies unreliable since they did not agree with the physical evidence, al though what physical evidence he meant was not explained.
NTSB member George Black suggested that eyewitness accounts could not be relied on since he assumed that many of them had been drinking, given the time of day and location of the accident.
NTSB Chairman Jim Hall, an ally of Al Gore, said at the outset, "I take exception to those who consistently distort the record and persist in making unfounded charges of a cover-up. They do a disservice to us all."
Hall insisted that there was no evidence found to suggest that the crash of TWA 800 was caused by a bomb or a missile. However, the FBI has confiscated a great deal of evidence from the NTSB investigators, which it still refuses to release.
Marge Gross, who lost her brother on TWA 800, said at a press conference after the hearings that it was the NTSB that was distorting the facts. Gross has been trying for years, to no avail, to obtain the shards of shrapnel that were found in her brother's body.
Hundreds of metal fragments were retrieved from the bodies of the victims and independent investigators insist that this evidence is crucial to understanding what happened to TWA 800.
Comdr. Bill Donaldson (Navy Ret), who has independently investigated TWA 800 and has conducted similar investigations of military aviation accidents for decades, called the NTSB panel "Snow White and the Seven Dwarves."
Donaldson said that the radar evidence proves that a missile struck TWA 800. He went on to say "the initiating event was not the center wing tank. It was a high-pressure event on the left side of the aircraft."
Donaldson maintains that a missile struck the first wing tank on the left side of the plane and that the physical evidence proves that the resulting explosion blew into the center wing tank which then exploded. He has also released radar data that shows metal fragments exiting the plane at Mach 2 speeds. These high-velocity fragments, he concludes, can only be pieces of a missile that passed through the plane.
As Hall was leaving the hearings, Gross and attorney John Clarke handed him a summons in which he and Loeb are named along with former deputy FBI director James Kallstrom and five other government officials, as being involved in a conspiracy to conceal the truth of the accident.
The plaintiffs in the suit are former police officer and investigative journalist James Sanders, the author of Altered Evidence,* and his wife Elisabeth.
Sanders' suit charges that in pursuance of a conspiracy eight individuals from the NTSB, the FBI and the Justice Department, trampled the civil and constitutional rights of the former law officer.
Sanders charges that government agents violated his First Amendment rights when they arrested him and his wife, unlawfully searched his phone records and seized his computer without a warrant, and broke into his files.
A PHOTO FROM MARS - Is this photo proof that there is life on Mars? What do you see, a squirrel or a rock? Note the light fur around the eye and shadows under the head and the contours of the body. After spending untold billions to find evidence of life and water on Mars, why is NASA not excited about this photo from Mars? Why is the son of one of the managers of the Mars mission asking me to remove this posting?
Your "Chinchilla on Mars" posting is a needless, pointless, frivolous distraction that will damage your credibility... The "chinchilla" is a rock that has features somewhat reminiscent of a chinchilla... Please remove the posting, or at least mitigate it by saying that it is probably a rock. - Robert D. Pickar, San Pedro, California
(NB! Pickar's father, Kenneth A. Pickar, is a professor at Caltech, the private institution that runs the Mars mission, and is on the President's Advisory Board for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the agency which is managing the mission.)
Kenneth Arnold Pickar of Caltech Pickar, who has close ties to Israel and worked at the Technion in the 1970s, is on the President's Advisory Board of JPL, the agency running the Mars mission.
A slide from Ken Pickar's 2010 presentation on Caltech and the Mars mission. The terrestrial rodent found in the "Mars photo" raises the obvious question: Is the Mars mission really on Mars, or is it a massive scam?
The most popular science story on FoxNews.com on May 29 was an article entitled "'Mars rat' spied by NASA's Curiosity rover." The Fox News article is about a photograph taken on September 28, 2012, by NASA's rover that is supposedly roaming around on the surface of Mars. The photograph clearly shows what appears to be chinchilla-like rodent between a couple rocks. The people who are running the mission to Mars should be ecstatic about finding evidence of life on the Red Planet. Instead of telling the world about the discovery of a rodent on Mars, NASA and the JPL are clearly trying to avoid discussing this photo. This raises the question, is the NASA rover really on Mars or is it simply roaming around the Atacama Desert in Chile, or some other Mars-like terrain on planet Earth? Having spent untold billions of taxpayer dollars on its mission to Mars, is NASA duping us about the whole thing? Just where did this chinchilla come from?
There are plenty of deserts, like this one in Nevada, that resemble the barren and rocky terrain seen in the Mars mission. Is the Mars mission a billion-dollar hoax?
After getting a comment asking me to remove the posting, I looked more closely into the nature of the rodent seen in the photograph. The person who asked me to remove the posting is Robert D. Pickar of San Pedro. His father, Kenneth Arnold Pickar of Rolling Hills (a gated enclave of Palos Verdes), is a visiting professor at Caltech. Caltech runs the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), which is managing the Mars mission. Kenneth Pickar, who has been at Caltech since 1998, is on the President's Advisory Board for the JPL.
The JPL is a Federally funded research and development center managed and operated by Caltech under a contract from NASA. In fiscal year 2012, the JPL's budget was nearly $1.5 billion (On average, Caltech, a tiny private institution in Pasadena, receives about $1.74 billion per year, more than $783,000 per student from the U.S. taxpayer.) If the highly-paid people who run the Mars mission are so concerned about my chinchilla posting I had better make sure I have my rodents straight.
While I agree with the criticism that the animal may not be a chinchilla, it certainly does not look like a rock. The little fellow looks furry and has eyes and ears and a tail. It actually looks more like a white-tailed antelope squirrel than a chinchilla. The white-tailed antelope squirrel is a species of rodents commonly found in the deserts of California and Nevada. The first photograph below is from the Mars mission.
EXTRATERRESTRIAL RODENT - The desert rodent seen in the Mars photo, which I originally called a chinchilla, actually looks more like a white-tailed antelope squirrel, native to the deserts of California. (Note the painted blue rocks.)
The white-tailed antelope squirrel carries his tail up on his back, which is what the rodent in the photo seems to be doing. Is the Caltech mission to Mars actually happening in a desert in the American Southwest?
Maybe Bollyn and the Truth Movement aren't what they appear to be? Did anyone bother to think that the people that perpetrated 911 spent even MORE TIME developing and strategizing how they would deal with public opinion AFTER the event then they did planning the event itself? Perhaps 911 was SO COMPLEX that very few people will ever understand what really happened, WHY and how. I challenge Bollyn. He's lying. - Jeff Prager, June 5, 2011
SO, WHO IS JEFF PRAGER?
Who is Jeffrey J. Prager and why is the Sheriff of Maricopa County (Arizona) looking for him?
Joe Arpaio, "America's Toughest Sheriff," is looking for Jeffrey J. Prager. Is Jeffrey J. Prager the same Jeff Prager who claims that mini-nukes brought down the World Trade Center?
JEFF PRAGER 2013 - Jeff Prager in Minnesota claims that mini-nukes brought down the Twin Towers. He has the exact same birthday (07-22-1955) as the Jeffrey J. Prager being sought by Sheriff Arpaio. Is he the same person? Does he use long hair to disguise his appearance?
Jeffrey J. Prager and Jeff Prager were both born on July 22, 1955. The photo that Jeff Prager uses on his profile page is from 1975, when he was 20.
JEFF PRAGER 1975 - Why would Prager use a 38-year-old photo on his profile page?
Is this what Jeff Prager looks like under all the hair?
I received an email the other day asking me about Jeff Prager’s writings about the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9-11 being a nuclear event. In his most recent article, written with Don Fox and Ed Ward, Prager says, “only mini-nukes… can explain what is observed.” Prager writes he and his co-authors “believe” that mini-nukes, “probably neutron bombs,” were planted in the core columns of the buildings, but in a recent video he goes further in stating his conviction that the Twin Towers were demolished with mini-nukes, saying, “I have actual proof that it was.”
If he has “actual proof” that mini-nukes brought down the Twin Towers, I wonder why he uses the word “believe” in the article? If one has proof that something is true, it is not a question of belief. If Prager has proof that mini-nukes were used, he should present his proof to show the rest of the world that his 9-11 nuclear demolition theory is true.
This is what the email said:
A while back I figured out that Jeff Prager was the author of this:
1. Why? There were certainly multiple motives behind 9/11. Why rule out stolen gold?
2. How? There were certainly multiple means behind 9/11. Why rule out mini nukes?
3. Who? There were certainly multiple perpetrators behind 9/11. Why rule out the Bush CIA gang?
Although I had heard of Jeff Prager before, I didn’t really know who he was, so I began by doing a little research.
WHO IS THE REAL JEFF PRAGER?
Apart from promoting his mini-nuke theory, Prager also attacks me and Steven E. Jones, the professor who found chips of active thermitic material (super-thermite) in the dust of the demolished Twin Towers. While one can clearly and honestly say that Jones has found proof that super-thermite was involved in the destruction of the Twin Towers, Prager and his colleagues are dedicated to trying to disprove (in the public mind) the thermite theory with their mini-nuke theory.Does the discovery of chips of super-thermite mean nothing to them?
Prager also does not like my Solving 9-11 work and even says that I am lying, although he does not say where or how I am lying. The following discussion about my book (the online version) is from Prager’s website “Fighting for Liberty”.
Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World Christopher Bollyn PDF
Reply by Stephen Smith on May 29, 2011 at 3:32pm
Well what do you effing know, I just started reading Bollyn's book just last night! So far I am enormously impressed. I've been aware of it for at least a year now, but you know how things go, so much going on you can't possibly remain focused on anything for very long. I believe this book is THE book to read, for those who want to know WHO really pulled 9/11 off, and frankly I believe most of the 9/11 Truth movement has it COMPLETELY WRONG when they want to pin it all on Bush/Cheney. They certainly had something to do with it (NORAD stand-down in the case of Cheney), but they were clearly NOT the masterminds! Everyone should read this book, because the real culprits behind 9/11 are going to get away scot-free if they aren't brought to justice ASAP!!
Reply by Jeff on June 5, 2011 at 9:27am
WHY does Bollyn NOT discuss ANYTHING in these PDF's? WHY doesn't the 911 Truth Movement discuss ANYTHING in these PDFs? Maybe Bollyn and the Truth Movement aren't what they appear to be? Did anyone bother to think that the people that perpetrated 911 spent even MORE TIME developing and strategizing how they would deal with public opinion AFTER the event then they did planning the event itself? Perhaps 911 was SO COMPLEX that very few people will ever understand what really happened, WHY and how. I challenge Bollyn. He's lying. - Jeff Prager, June 5, 2011
Prager says I am lying, but doesn’t say where or how. In the same way Prager claims to have “actual proof” that mini-nukes brought down the World Trade Center and that only nuclear bombs “can explain what is observed” during the demolition of the Twin Towers. If he has proof that I am lying, he should present it to the public so people can decide for themselves who is lying - and who is not. Likewise with his claim that he has “actual proof” to support his mini-nuke theory. If he has evidence or proof, he should present it to the public so that experts can determine the veracity of his claim.
Why would Prager be attacking me and calling me a liar if he is not willing to show where or how I am lying? Is he just another disinfo agent who has been tasked to attack Dr. Jones and me - and the real evidence of thermite? Is his mini-nuke theory just another red herring to distract people by confusing them about the real evidence of super-thermite found in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers? If so, why would he be doing that? Who is he working for?
DEADBEAT DAD Jeffrey J. Prager is in Sheriff Arpaio's "Deadbeat Parents Hall of Shame." Evidently he has failed to pay the required child support for his children. Is this the same Jeff Prager who claims that only mini-nukes explain what happened to the Twin Towers? Are his legal problems somehow connected to his active promotion of this red herring theory? Is he a paid disinfo agent or is there some other incentive at work?
Daryl Bradford Smith - The False Accusations of a Disinfo Agent
April 21, 2013
Well, here's a deal. And this is between you and me, because we've been doing this a long time together. You have to come out and, and slam Bollyn every way you can, in my, in support of me. Every way you can. No compromise.... You don't even know me man. You know something? Check my f--king criminal record. I'll grab you by the neck, Eric. - "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can," Daryl Smith's taped threat to Eric Hufschmid, 2007
Daryl Bradford Smith of "The French Connection" recently posted a false accusation saying that I had threatened his life. Smith is a known agent with a criminal record who has been slandering me since 2005.
I received the following message from Vincent Gillespie on Sunday, April 21:
Hi Chris, First of all, I have quickly looked at your latest post about the Boston bombing and it looks very interesting. I plan to look at it more carefully probably tonight. (Boston is less than two hours down the road from me.)
But that is not the main reason for this email. I just saw that on iamthewitness.com the following message:
Christopher Bollyn has sent me and my wife a death threat, If you have any information to help with the investigation please contact me at Smith@Iamthewitness.com
I would guess that others have probably already told you about this but in case you don't know about it I am letting you know.
I had not heard about it and checked "The French Connection" website on April 21, but did not find the accusation. I did find it on the cached version of April 15. In this version Smith has added the words "or someone claiming to be him" to soften his very serious accusation:
Screen shot from "The French Connection" of April 15, 2013, in which Daryl Smith accuses me of sending him a death threat.
Daryl Smith's accusation is preposterous but serious, which is why I am compelled to respond to it with this statement. It is utterly false. I have had no contact whatsoever with Daryl Smith since 2006 or early 2007.
Smith, on the other hand, has spread vicious lies and slander about me since I met him in France in November 2005. I was aware that he had told blatant lies about me to people after that visit but put that matter aside when I was asked to speak on The French Connection's "radio show" with him and Eric Hufschmid to discuss my 9-11 research. I thought it was far more important to get the information out to the public than to hold a grudge against Smith for his slanderous comments.
As I wrote in my December 2007 article about Smith's treachery, 'Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can' - Daryl B. Smith:
After meeting Smith, I repeatedly warned Hufschmid that this person clearly could not be trusted. It was obvious. Shortly after that Thanksgiving 2005 visit, Smith was already spreading malicious slander about me to somebody in Canada. It was very clear that Smith had an agenda from the beginning -- to defame me and attack my credibility. I had no idea who he was working for, but he definitely was not a truth seeker and was clearly working against me.
During the summer of 2007, Smith completely revealed himself as an agent and articulated that his mission was to defame me and destroy my credibility in any way he could. After he went on his vicious attack, he tried to get Eric Hufschmid to support him and join the defamation campaign against me. Hufschmid resisted.
Eric recorded several of the phone calls in which Smith demanded that Hufschmid attack me. Smith made several clear threats on the life of Hufschmid and was evidently unaware that he was being recorded.
One would think that the taped phone call in which Smith clearly threatens Hufschmid to "slam Bollyn every way you can" would have ended Smith's career in the 9-11 truth community, but it didn't. He is still at it because it is his job. He, like others, is paid to attack me. Because this may be a bit confusing, I will try to explain Smith's role as an agent.
Smith came into the 9-11 truth movement in 2005, after someone cleared up his criminal charges for various narcotics offenses in Massachusetts or Rhode Island. He then started his website, The French Connection, and with it's online "radio show", Smith gained entrée into the 9-11 truth movement, especially among those circles that had read my material about Israeli involvement in the false-flag terror spectacle. Then, after having achieved some credibility among online listeners and readers, he tried to discredit me with vicious lies and slander.
This is a well-known intelligence/progaganda tactic. Act like a mockingbird by imitating and copying the real source - and then turn against it and attack it. By having achieved some credibility and a following, the slander will be believed by some people and thus succeed in smearing the person being attacked. With others, the slanderous comments and character assassination will raise some doubts and suspicion about the person being targeted. Michael Piper from American Free Press does the exact same thing. It is precisely the use of this tactic by Smith and Piper that most clearly reveals that they are not working for the truth - but against it.
There are three fundamental aspects of the 9-11 evidence that Ms Wood completely and intentionally misrepresents:
1. The amount of steel left in the rubble;
2. The nature of the active thermitic material found in the dust;
3. The temperature of the dust.
About the steel that remained at Ground Zero, Wood dismisses it saying there were only "some pieces of steel here and there." Later, when asked by Moore about the steel that was shipped to China, Wood replies, "What steel?"
She then adds that the trucks leaving the site were not carrying steel, but dirt, which she claims was being trucked in to Ground Zero, and out again. There was, according to Ms Wood, "very little debris" left at the World Trade Center. This is all pure nonsense, of course, as is her digression about Hurricane Erin being "just off the coast of Manhattan."
THE TRACK OF HURRICANE ERIN (2001) - Erin, a tropical storm/hurricane, did not even come close to Manhattan. It passed Bermuda and moved away from the strong high pressure zone over the Eastern United States.
There were, in fact, hundreds of thousands of tons of steel left in the rubble pile, which was huge. The basements of the Twin Towers were 7 levels deep. One junkyard alone processed 250,000 tons of steel from the rubble. The photographs from the site clearly disprove Wood's statement about there only being "some pieces of steel here and there."
Dust and steel was all that was left, according to one of the contractors who received steel from the World Trade Center.
Secondly, Ms Wood misrepresents the nature of the thermitic material that was found in the dust. Dr. Steven E. Jones of BYU discovered fragments and chips of a bi-layered active (i.e. explosive) thermitic coating in which the ultrafine particles of aluminum and iron oxide were combined in a nano-scale thermitic compound, like super-thermite.
Furthermore, Wood wrongly compares the reaction of the nanocomposite of thermitic material with a typical thermite reaction. The nature of the reaction is very different when the material is mixed at the nanoscale. She and Pete Santilli ask where are the white sparks? There were visible thermite reactions on 9-11, but the explosive super-thermite coating would not have reacted like "a sparkler", as Ms Wood expects.
A THERMITE REACTION certainly appears to be occurring at this corner of the South Tower, shortly before collapse, where a very bright white spot on the end of a fallen column is producing a whitish smoke. (Source - The White Flames of Thermite)
2 The aluminum and iron oxide found in the active thermitic material were combined in a bi-layered coating that exploded when heated to 430 degrees C. The ultrafine particles of aluminum and iron oxide in this explosive material were part of a highly energetic sol-gel coating.
It was not, as Ms Wood said, bits of aluminum and iron oxide sitting in the dust by themselves. The ultrafine particles in the chips found by Dr. Jones had been mixed and combined in a sol-gel thermitic coating - and were found in that condition. When heat (about 430 degrees C) was applied to these fragments or chips they exploded in an explosive exothermic reaction that released more energy per mass than the other leading explosives used in demolition.
Thirdly, Ms Wood challenged a caller who described the dust clouds of 9-11 being "pyroclastic". The word pyroclast is derived from the Greek words for "fire" and "broken in pieces". Eyewitnesses to the demolition of the towers, such as William Rodriguez, who was beneath a fire truck when the dust hit him, said the dust was very hot.
Judy Wood, however, misrepresents the dust as being cool. Later, she says "the process wasn't high heat." The USGS survey of the dust, however, shows that the dust contained a very large amount of iron in the form of tiny droplets of molten iron, known as iron-rich spheres. These droplets could have only been formed by the extreme heat energy released during the demolition of the Twin Towers. The heat was so great that parts of some steel beams or columns showed evidence of having beenvaporized. The thermitic material itself would have contributed super-intense heat and molten iron to the equation. The iron spheres found in the dust had been in the molten state only seconds before they flowed in the pyroclastic clouds that rolled through Lower Manhattan. Wood's statement that the process was not "high heat" is clearly proven false by the evidence.
An iron-rich sphere from the USGS survey of the dust. The dust clouds that accompanied the demolition of the World Trade Center were indeed "pyroclastic" since they contained a large amount of molten metal that was very hot.
Judy Wood's misrepresentation of the evidence is intentional and seems to be designed for one purpose: to confuse the public about the nature of the thermitic material found in the dust and how it caused the pulverization of the 220 concrete floor slabs and the steel pans that held them.
Wood says that a new word, "dustification", is necessary to explain what happened to the World Trade Center when it was demolished. I prefer the old word "pulverize", which means to reduce to powder or dust. This is, after all, exactly what the active thermitic coating did to the concrete floors of the World Trade Center - and everything on them.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
"The White Flames of Thermite" by Christopher Bollyn, April 21, 2006
Christopher Dorner was an honest cop who was destroyed by a dishonest system.
Like Dorner, Frank Serpico was an honest cop who was rejected by an utterly corrupt police force. In 1971, Serpico was the first police officer in the history of the New York City Police Department to step forward to report and subsequently testify about widespread, systemic corruption payoffs amounting to millions of dollars. What does that say about the history of systemic corruption within the NYPD?
THE POLICE LIES ABOUT CHRIS DORNER
"Seven burners deployed, and we have a fire... Fire will be staged at the first contact with the first armored unit down there." - Comments between police surrounding the cabin Dorner was hiding in.
"We did not intentionally burn down that cabin to get Mr. Dorner out." - San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon, February 13, 2013
There is a saying that the lie is the greatest sin because it is the mother of all sins by allowing other sins to be committed. This is particularly true in the tragic case of Christopher Dorner, which is a case that is wrapped in police lies.
It was a police lie that was behind Chris Dorner being fired by the Los Angeles Police Department in the first place, but it wasn't his lie. He simply could not accept that a police officer, a white female, would kick a detained person right in the face and then lie about it. This was the lie that was behind Dorner being accused of making false statements and which led to him losing his career with the L.A.P.D. The fact that Dorner was wrongly fired after being accused of being a liar led to his severe depression, which is anger turned inwards. The essence of the Dorner case is that he was an honest and upright man who was rejected and vilified by a corrupt "law enforcement" system in which lies are used every day.
For a saga that began with a lie it seems oddly fitting that the police then lied about how they had killed Dorner by using an incediary tear gas, known as CS gas, and brazenly told the media that they had not started the fire that consumed the cabin with Dorner inside. It was like Waco redux. The recordings of the police during the siege, however, clearly indicate that they planned to use an incendiary gas, ignite the flammable gas, and burn the cabin down - with Dorner inside.
ABC News reported the text of the police comments during their siege of the cabin where Dorner was hiding: "Burn the gas. Burn the gas. Burn it down." The Sheriff of San Bernardino County then lied to the press saying the police had not started the fire.
DORNER AND THE CULTURE OF CORRUPTION
I have exhausted all available means at obtaining my name back. I have attempted all legal court efforts within appeals at the Superior Courts and California Appellate courts. This is my last resort. The LAPD has suppressed the truth and it has now lead to deadly consequences....
Are you aware [Teresa] Evans has since [been] promoted to Sergeant after kicking Mr. Gettler in the face. Oh, you violated a citizen‘s civil rights? We will promote you....
Those of you who “go along to get along” have no backbone and destroy the foundation of courage. You are the enablers of those who are guilty of misconduct. You are just as guilty as those who break the code of ethics and oath you swore....
It is endless the amount of times per week officers arrest an individual, label him a suspect-arrestee-defendant and then before arraignment or trial realize that he is innocent based on evidence. You know what they say when they realize an innocent man just had his life turned upside down? “I guess he should have stayed at home that day he was discovered walking down the street and matching the suspect's description. Oh well, he appeared to be a dirtbag anyways.” Meanwhile the falsely accused is left to pick up his life, get a new, family, friends, and sense of self worth. - Extracts from the Christopher Dorner Manifesto (Uncensored) http://boywithgrenade.org/2013/02/07/christopher-dorners-manifesto/
The Christopher Dorner case sheds much-needed light on the systemic culture of corruption which infects many police departments across the United States. While Dorner's case directly concerns the notorious Los Angeles Police Department, the very same culture of police corruption can be found in Chicago, New York, and many other American cities. Indeed, the exact same culture of corruption exists in my hometown, the Village of Hoffman Estates (Illinois), where I was subjected to a brutal undercover police attack in August 2006.
The Wikipedia article for police corruptioncontains the following statement with a footnote:
One study of corruption in the Los Angeles Police Department (focusing particularly on the Rampart scandal) proposed that certain forms of police corruption may be the norm, rather than the exception, in American policing.
Indeed, I use the word systemic to describe this culture of police corruption because it relates to and affects the entire system. The culture of police corruption that is exposed in the Dorner case, as in mine, could not exist by itself. It is supported by a corrupt court system and the controlled media, which makes it very hard to fight against. Because many people have not experienced the kind of violent police abuse that is at the center of the Dorner case, it is important to present the basic facts of the case: A mentally ill citizen named Christopher Gettler was allegedly kicked in the face by an abusive officer, Teresa Evans of the L.A.P.D. The following video is Gettler's testimony about being kicked in the face. The inch-long scar can still clearly be seen beneath Gettler's left eye.
The Dorner case involves a military veteran from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which complicates the case, but the essential facts of how he got caught up in a case of police abuse are simple. As the Los Angeles Times presents it:
Dorner's case revolved around a July 28, 2007, call about a man causing a disturbance at the DoubleTree Hotel in San Pedro. When Dorner and his training officer showed up, they found Christopher Gettler. He was uncooperative and threw a punch at one of the officers, prompting Dorner's training officer, Teresa Evans, to use an electric Taser weapon on him.
Nearly two weeks later, Dorner told a sergeant that Evans had kicked Gettler once in the face and twice in the left shoulder or nearby chest area. Afterward, Dorner said, Evans told him not to include the kicks on the arrest report.
An internal affairs investigation into the allegation concluded the kicks never occurred. Investigators subsequently decided that Dorner had fabricated his account. He was charged with making false accusations.
At the December 2008 Board of Rights hearing, Dorner's attorney, Randal Quan, conceded that his client should have reported the kicks sooner but told the board that Dorner ultimately did the right thing. He called the case against Dorner "very, very ugly."
"This officer wasn't given a fair shake," Quan said, according to transcripts of the board hearing. "In fact, what's happening here is this officer is being made a scapegoat."
At the hearing, Dorner stuck to his story. Evans, he said, kicked Gettler once in the left side of his collarbone lightly with her right boot as they struggled to handcuff him. She kicked him once more forcefully in the same area, Dorner testified, and then much harder in the face, snapping Gettler's head back. Dorner said he noticed fresh blood on Gettler's face. - “Dorner manhunt: conflicting testimony in ex-cop's firing case,”Los Angeles Times, February 11, 2013
Dorner consequently reported that Evans had kicked Gettler in the face, which meant that Dorner was breaking the Blue Code of Silence which is defined as the unwritten rule among police officers in the United States not to report on another colleague's errors, misconducts, or crimes. This is the real reason Dorner was fired from the L.A.P.D. He had broken the police "code of silence", the Mafia-style "omerta" that police across America abide by.
I discovered the same kind of police corruption in Hoffman Estates after I was attacked by three undercover police at my home in August 2006. My first complaints were directed at Clint Herdegen, then Chief of Police, and the village board. What I found, however, was a complete lack of concern or even interest in the facts of the case by the people who should be obliged to respond to such abuses. The Chicago papers that covered the story reported only the police version of the attack without even contacting me. When I attended the village board meeting a few days after the attack the corrupt chief of police, Clint Herdegen, was being given an award. This is how corruption works - the criminals are rewarded for their crimes.
The three officers who were involved in the attack: Timothy Stoy, Michael Barber, and Darin Felgenhauer, are all still on the force and have even been promoted. Chief Herdegen retired at age 50, took his generous Hoffman Estates pension package and went to a new job the same week - as chief of police in Libertyville, Illinois.
Darin Felgenhauer (center) was the "lethal officer" in the TASER attack on Bollyn who was prepared to shoot him if he went berserk. Felgenhauer, who testified in court that Bollyn had committed no crime before he turned to go to his house, has since been promoted to sergeant in Hoffman Estates. On the left is William McLeod, the village president.
Clint Herdegen, the corrupt chief of police behind the attack on Bollyn. To conspire against a citizen as he did with the police force in Hoffman Estates is a federal offense.
When I was arrested and taken away from my home TASERed and handcuffed, I asked what I was being arrested for. The police did not answer because they had not yet conspired and produced the false report in which they falsely charged me with assault and resisting arrest. The police report in my case has several authors, not all of whom are known.
When I was finally able to find a lawyer, Jack Smeaton of Wilmette, and told him that I wanted to challenge the police lies in court, he told me that the police will lie on the stand and the court and jury will believe them - not you. I was, however, unwilling to accept guilt for something I had not done and chose to go to trial, which is the path less trod in Cook County Courts.
In court, it was exactly as Smeaton had said: the police gave each other high fives when they entered and then lied on the stand and presented false testimony and evidence, in spades. Although the three undercover police gave clearly conflicting testimony, they were believed and I was found guilty. The judge, Hyman I. Riebman, refused to allow my evidence of a police conspiracy or expert witness to be presented. (The judge's son, Elliot Riebman, was defense attorney for the former governor, Rod Blagojevich, who was sentenced to 18 years in prison for talking on the phone with Rahm Emanuel about the appointment of a replacement to the U.S. Senate for the vacated seat of Barack Obama.)
The systemic problem of police corruption only comes to the attention of the public when an egregious case of abuse is caught on camera and shown to the whole world on the Internet. Most cases, however, are not caught on camera or the video evidence is destroyed, which is what happened in my case.
The police should not be allowed to operate as a publicly-funded armed gang that abuses the citizenry it is supposed to serve and protect. Whatever the outcome of the Dorner case, his desperate actions have achieved one thing: they have served to focus public attention on the culture of police corruption in America. In order to rectify this very serious social problem we will need to maintain our focus and understand that the culture of police corruption will continue to infect our communities as long as it is supported by the courts, the political establishment, and the media.We cannot accept that our police departments - and our communities - are ruled by criminal gangs.
Ahmadinejad Makes Sense
September 27, 2012
Some of the best interviews with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during the past few days were on CBS News, thanks mostly to the skill of their translator in his ability to express the thoughts of the Iranian president in English. I thought that President Ahmadinejad's unanswered question in the following video about the relationship between the United States and Israel spoke volumes about the controlled media. The following video clip is well worth watching.
If it seems like the CBS talking heads are just a bit biased in their line of questioning, it should be noted that CBS News is a division of the CBS Corporation, a corporation which is headed by Leslie Moonves. Moonves is the President and Chief Executive Officer of CBS Corp. Leslie Moonves also happens to be the great-nephew of David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel.
The Wikipedia article on Leslie Moonves reports that his CBS salary in 2011 was just shy of $70 million. CBS News under the control of Leslie Moonves is a perfect example of what is meant by the term "Zionist-controlled media."
AFP and Disinformation: How it works
August 21, 2012
AMERICAN FREE PRESS PROMOTES OBAMA & ROMNEY
American Free Press (AFP), a Washington, D.C.-based publication that published my articles from June 2000 until October 2006, claims to be a populist "employee-owned" newspaper dedicated to the cause of patriotic Americans. The paper's readers are understandably befuddled by the fact that the "populist" paper now supports both Zionist-controlled candidates for president, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, while completely ignoring the candidate preferred by the overwhelming majority of American voters - Dr. Ron Paul. American patriots are asking, "What's going on?"
Willis Carto, boss of American Free Press,promotes Obama...
...while Pete Papaherakles pushes Romney. It should be noted that there was no similar piece in the supposedly "populist" newspaper supporting Dr. Ron Paul, the most popular presidential candidate of our time. So, pray tell, what kind of operation is American Free Press?
One reader and supporter of AFP was so outraged by the pieces supporting the Zionist-controlled candidates that he wrote this email to the editor:
HAS AFP LOST ITS MIND? SERIOUSLY, HAVE YOU?
Obama? Romney? A choice? Are you for REAL?
I am a Vietnam vet who did 2 combat tours of duty, became an early and fervent supporter of the Spotlight, continued that support through the years with American Free Press...
The August 6, 2012, issue contained these two shocking, shameless and highly offensive twin articles that might have been written by the radically Zionist New York Times..."Given the Choice, Even This WWII Vet Will Vote Obama" [by Willis Carto] and "Why Mitt's A Better Choice for America" [by Pete Papaherakles].
I for one feel totally betrayed by people I had trusted. I'd be very surprised if the majority of your readers don't feel exactly the same way. Where did such utter insanity come from?
It's not unreasonable to ask: does AFP have an ulterior objective? A hidden agenda?
Editorialize in favor of patriots withholding their votes in the absence of even a lesser evil among presidential contenders; Build the case for writing Ron Paul's name on the ballot. ANYTHING but urging voters to sell their souls to anti-Christian Zionism by pretending there is a choice between Obama or Romney - two indistinguishable war-mongering totalitarian statists and Israeli-first pawns of the Synagogue of Satan.
How can you insult the intelligence of the good people that comprise your own support base with articles like these that betray everything you supposedly stand for?
I am very tempted to remove AFP from my website link. I may yet do so. The next step will be to terminate my subscription. And after that, to blast AFP in a hard-hitting public denunciation given wide circulation among many friends, supporters and contacts - no few of whom are AFP subscribers.
Judas betrayed Jesus Christ with the kiss of friendship. AFP has betrayed its loyal readership with these two abominable articles. I am ashamed to be affiliated with a publication that would publish such trash as this. Whatever happened to the paper's integrity?
As a person who worked at the Liberty Lobby andAmerican Free Press, I have personal insight and experience with the people who run this operation. To put it plainly: American Free Presshas no integrity. It is a controlled-opposition operation.
Some people, wanting to believe in the American Free Press, will resist what I say. American patriots, being honest people, will find it hard to believe that they have been deceived by a "patriotic" publication they believe in - and support. They will ask themselves, why should I believe Bollyn?
I generally do not force my opinion on people. I provide factual information to my readers and let them decide what is true and what is not. Regarding AFP, I have informed my readers that the editor is a self-proclaimed "Satanist" and the lawyer-in-chief is Mark Lane, the smiling bastard who instigated the Jonestown massacre. If good people, like the Catholic who wrote to AFP, want to believe in and support Satanists and instigators of mass murder, there is nothing I can do about it.
When I started at the Liberty Lobby, on my first day at the office, the person who was responsible from bringing me on asked me to tell him who I thought was the agent. Looking back, I should have told him, "I can only tell you who is not an agent - me."
I had seen how the editor of the supposedly anti-Semitic Barnes Review, a young lady named Jennifer White, understood spoken Hebrew. I told my friend that she was most likely the agent. Looking back I can see that almost all of the people were agents.
Michael Piper, for example, who openly toted a bag bearing the logo of AIPAC, the Israeli lobby in Washington, is one of the key executives of AFP. Piper was proud to brag about his Jewish ancestry. The same Michael Piper happens to be one of the leading agents of disinformation about me, along with Eric Hufschmid and Darrel Bradford Smith. These three agents have clearly spread malicious lies about me on the Internet. Hufschmid and Smith are small change, but Piper is one of the people at AFP who was allowed to sign company checks. He is clearly part of the core operation at AFP. What does that fact tell us about this so-called "populist" operation?
At AFP, with my background in the Middle East, I was a very popular writer providing weekly reports on the false-flag terrorism of 9-11 and other subjects. This is, after all, why I had been hired: to provide a veneer of authentic credible reporting for a fraudulent operation. At the end of 2005, however, the powers that run AFP decided to get rid of me. I was sent on a wild goose chase in Venezuela to try and get money from Hugo Chavez and then trapped in Hoffman Estates, where a tactical unit connected to the federal government pounced on me in August 2006. I was then criminalized and dragged through the corrupt Cook County court where I was found to have assaulted three heavily-armed undercover police and resisted their arrest. To understand what this means I recommend reading about what happened to USMC veteran Brandon Raub of Virginia.
I had, however, seen early on that AFP was not a serious newspaper. They had, for example, zerodistribution in the nation's capital, where they were based. One could not even buy the paper in Trover's, the bookstore across the street from our office, or from the newspaper's own boxes at Union Station, the Pentagon, or the nearest tube stop. The AFP newspaper boxes were not even being stocked with the paper. When I pointed out these fundamental problems, I was directed to a person who clearly could not have cared less. This person, Steven Lombardo, is still on the staff of the paper as their "outreach" person despite the fact that he failed to distribute the paper in Washington, D.C.! None of this made business sense and I soon came to realize that AFP is not run like a business or a newspaper. While AFP was clearly not being run to grow and gain readers, it was constantly asking its readers to donate money.
After I was attacked by a squad of undercover police at my home in August 2006, the AFP newspaper turned against me, even as it collected money for my legal defense. The person who spearheaded the attacks against me was Michael Piper, a homosexual writer at American Free Presswho brags about his Jewish ancestors. Immediately after the police attack and TASERing, Piper and Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn) ganged up on me to accuse me of "disloyalty" toAmerican Free Press. At the same time, Piper pressured Willis Carto to dis-invite me to AFP's annual dinner, which was scheduled for the first week in September. The pre-planned police attack on me, the paper's star investigative journalist, would have been the big story at the Labor Day conference, and Piper was clearly tasked to prevent me from appearing at the conference.
Piper then began spreading vicious lies about me, although he actually began sabotaging my efforts already in 2001. The malicious lies that Piper says about me are a form of disinformation. The same tactic has been used against me by Eric Hufschmid and Darrel Bradford Smith. All three have employed the same fundamental tactic used by disinformation agents: Pose as a supporter of the truth (in this case the 9-11 truth movement) then make comments that discredit the movement. Disinformation is a method to control how people think and feel about a person or a subject using a variety of techniques. While disinformation is a subject that is often mentioned, it is not well understood by most people. To get a grasp of the basic tactics of disinformation, I highly recommend the article by Brandon Smith, entitled "Disinformation: How it Works". Brandon Smith's article will help the reader recognize disinformation agents and avoid the confusion they spread about important subjects.
Why the Assange Case is Important
Updated July 1, 2012
These criticisms tell one more about the conventionality and herd instinct of British opinion-makers than they do about Assange. Ignored, in all this, is his achievement as founder of WikiLeaks in publishing U.S. government cables giving people across the world insight into how their governments really behave. Such public knowledge is the core of democracy because voters must be accurately informed if they are to be able to choose representatives to carry out their wishes.
Thanks to WikiLeaks, more information has become available about what the U.S. and allied states are doing and thinking than ever before...
The judgement in the British court that Julian Assange can be extradited to Sweden is important. Sweden's case against Assange is, of course, completely contrived and was designed by scheming Swedish lawyers for only one reason: to bring Mr. Assange back to Sweden so that he can be sent on to the United States to face the wrath of the Zionist crimocracy.
To understand why the Assange case is important, I recommend reading the recent interview with John Pilger by Dagens Nyheter.
If Assange is sent to Sweden, there are basically two possible outcomes. One outcome would benefit Sweden, the other would be very detrimental to the image of the Scandinavian state.
Here are the two possible outcomes:
1. Julian Assange is returned to Sweden where he is questioned about the claims made by the women. "No one was injured, no crime was committed," he is told. "Mr. Assange, you are now free to return to normal life without any penalty or sanction." Sweden dismisses its case against Assange and he is released a free man. This would be the proper way to resolve the case - and the best route for Sweden to follow.
2. Assange is questioned, cleared from the Swedish judicial system, and then turned over to U.S. authorities who have presented the Swedish state with a secret indictment against Assange. He is then flown to the United States for prosecution.
The first outcome would benefit the Swedish state. The second, on the other hand, would be bad for Sweden, particularly damaging to its image as a state that cares about the rule of law and human rights. The second outcome, despite the negative consequences, is the more likely of the two. Why? Because the foreign minister of Sweden is Carl Bildt, a close friend of the Bush family and insider with the CIA criminal regime.
Carl Bildt, the Swedish foreign minister, has a long history as an agent of the C.I.A. and the international Zionist criminal network.
Bildt and his daughter visit George Bush, ca. 1990
It should be remembered that Carl Bildt was the father of the "bow visor" lie, which was used to explain the sinking of Estonia on September 28, 1994. The Swedish-owned passenger ferry, which sank with an estimated 1,000 lives lost including 502 Swedes, was being used in an ongoing operation to smuggle stolen Soviet military technology - with the approval of then prime minister Bildt and the head of the Swedish military. Sweden was evidently being used as a transit point for the contraband, which was being forwarded on to Israel from Arlanda airport - without being inspected by Swedish customs on entry or exit from Sweden.
The following year, Carl Bildt was appointed to serve as "special envoy" in the Balkans, where he managed the dismemberment and plundering of the former Yugoslavia. I caught Carl Bildt in a private moment with George Soros during the Bilderberg meeting in Belgium in 2000. The first action taken by Western forces in NATO-occupied Kosovo was to close and take over the extremely rich Trepča mine. The mine was then turned over to a consortium of three mining companies, one Swedish, one American, and one French. Trepča is considered to be one of the richest mines in Europe in terms of the valuable minerals and metals found there. Kosovo also has a gold mine at Trpeza in the district of Prizren, which is now owned by Lydian International of Britain. The body language in this photo says it all: Bildt is an errand boy for the Zionist crimocracy.
George Soros and Carl Bildt, caught by Christopher Bollyn at Bilderberg meeting in Belgium, June 2000. Immediately after taking this photo I was threatened with physical violence by a gang of thugs. This was the last photo from my Bilderberg mission in June 2000.
"The global Murdoch media empire was created with Rothschild funding and exists to spread Zionist propaganda among the English-speaking populations of the world. Murdoch's son James is in line to take over at the helm of their media empire although it is quite likely that the empire will not survive very long after Rupert Murdoch passes away." - "Eric Hufschmid and Rupert Murdoch - Agents of Deception" 21 October 2010
JAMES MURDOCH & THE CODE OF OMERTA
It appears that James Murdoch has lied about the widespread criminal activities of the news organization he controls.
“Who knew what and when?” This is what lies at the heart of the phone hacking scandal at News International as evidence has emerged of illegal hacking and clandestine tracking of individuals on an industrial scale. The hackers and trackers were hired and paid for their services – some receiving strikingly generous remuneration. - "Lurid attack on Murdoch sheds no light", Scotsman.com, 11 November 2011
He knew nothing. Nothing at all. Never in the field of human management has one man known so little and so often. There may have been tea ladies at News International who knew more than James Murdoch about what was happening at the top of the company. - "James Murdoch: never has one man known so little, and so often"by Simon Hogart, The Guardian, 10 November 2011
Front page of London Evening Standard the day after the latest Murdoch hearing Source: London Evening Standard, 10 November 2011
MAFIA POSING AS MEDIA
James Murdoch, chairman of News International and son of Zionist media mogul Rupert Murdoch, was accused of being a "Mafia boss" during a parliamentary hearing on his company's widespread illegal activities and phone hacking. "You must be the first Mafia boss in history who did not know he was running a criminal enterprise," Labour MP Tom Watson told Murdoch, who appears to have lied about how much he knew about the illegal snooping activities done by his newspapers. James Murdoch happens to be Eric Hufschmid's brother-in-law. It may be that James Murdoch is not fully aware of the agents working within his organization and that the Leveson Inquiry which began on November 14 will not expose who is really running the illegal spying/snooping outfit inside the Murdoch organization. It seems quite likely that this gang of snoops inside the Murdoch organization are behind Hufschmid's long-term snooping and stalking of the Bollyn family. JAMES MURDOCH - "MAFIA BOSS"
END THE MURDOCH MAFIA - Protesters at the Houses of Parliament call for the end of the Zionist criminal gang running Murdoch's News International. The pro-war and pro-Israel news/propaganda network controlled by the Murdochs (FOX News, News Corp., etc.) dominates the U.S. news media.
THE HUFSCHMID CONNECTION
James Murdoch is married to Kathryn Hufschmid, Eric Hufschmid's half-sister. Kathryn Hufschmid works for the Clinton Climate Initiative, part of the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation is very well endowed with funds from Zionist activists and Israelis, such as the high-level Mossadnik Haim Saban, who donated more than $5 million. (To understand the importance of the Saban connection to Murdoch and Clinton, read my article "Afghanistan - Obama's War for Israel".)
Rupert Murdoch (left), Chairman and CEO of News Corporation and FOX News, is a close friend and long-time business partner of Haim Saban (right).
Eric Hufschmid has relentlessly snooped and stalked me and my family since June 2007, when I was compelled to leave the Chicago area after being maliciously prosecuted by a Zionist Jewish prosecutor before a Zionist Jewish judge. The prosecutor made it clear that I was being prosecuted for my 9/11 research and writing, which he called "anti-Jewish".
The criminal snooping at Murdoch's News International indicates that the Murdochs have long used illegal methods to snoop and gather information about people. The illegal hacking at News International, headed by James Murdoch, involved 28 journalists and targeted at least 5,795 people. I have written extensively about the Murdoch family connections to Israeli intelligence agents (e.g. Arnon Milchan) - and 9/11. Are the Murdochs behind Hufschmid's stalking of me and my family? Why else would Hufschmid spend so much time, effort, and money - more than 4 years - to stalk and harass my family? Why has he worked so hard to discredit my 9/11 research by saying that I have been kidnapped?
STALKER ARRESTED AT BOLLYN HOME
"Stalking is not fully understood by criminal justice professionals and too often the stalking pattern is missed. This results in a low priority being afforded to cases by all professionals in the criminal justice system. Victims pay with their lives." - Laura Richards, Criminal Behavioural Psychologist, "Stalking victims claim crime not taken seriously enough", The Guardian, 13 November 2011
A stalker who works closely with Eric Hufschmid was arrested at my house on Saturday night, 22 October 2011. The stalker snuck up behind my 13-year-old daughter on the dark street and followed her into our house. He was identified by police as an Italian named Mario Nardone (73-10-07).
In their relentless stalking of my family, Eric Hufschmid and Mario Nardone have been in contact with a Swede named Jan Gillberg, from Grenna, Sweden, who has snooped on my family for years. Gillberg publishes a so-called truth-seeking political magazine called DSM (Swedish acronym for Debate, Truthseeking, Media Criticism). These three disinformation agents pretend to be concerned about my well-being, but are actually working to harass and harm me and my family. Their primary aims are to spread lies about me in order to sow suspicion about my character, marginalize my research to reduce public support for my work, and instill fear and insecurity to disturb us. These are hostile and criminal actions by these so-called supporters.
Jan Gillberg is a Sweden-based agent/publisher who has snooped on the Bollyn family for years. After we left Sweden in August 2007, Gillberg actually opened and stole our personal mail (a crime in Sweden), which included personal mail, checks, and a book manuscript I was editing.
Gillberg then published an article in English about my family in his Swedish-language magazine, DSM,(No. 4 - 2007, seen above) with a photo he had taken of us against our will. By writing this article Gillberg offered himself to intelligence agencies as someone they could do business with. We have requested several times that Gillberg take down the libelous article but he hasn't. Gillberg has provided the Hufschmid network with essential information used in the stalking operation and he even contacted the top people of my childrens' schools to get personal information about my children.
Luckily, from the stairway, I had seen my daughter outside our front door where she was looking for her key, which she had dropped. I came to the door just as the stalker pulled himself in behind her. He said he was Wadesky and that he had come to help me. My wife and I confronted him in the stairway and asked him to identify himself, although he refused to produce an ID. He pretended to be a supporter, but did not have any questions for me and would not let Helje take a photo of him with me. He dodged and ducked every time she tried to get a photo of him. A neighbor, who is a retired policeman, was alerted immediately and called the police. When Nardone was arrested he was identified and photographed by the police.
The "Alex Wadesky" stalker, identified as Mario Nardone (the same name as one of the 9/11 victims at the World Trade Center), has been harassing and stalking my family since 2009, using the Wadesky alias when contacting my relatives. He and Hufschmid have called many of our relatives, from Estonia to America, telling them that we have been kidnapped and are in grave danger. They even contacted teachers and administrators at schools my children have attended. The police released Nardone without interviewing us, although we said that we wanted him charged and had been told that the police would be in touch with us. The Hufschmid gang, however, has not stopped their stalking of my family. Several weeks after Nardone was arrested we received a fourth threatening letter within a month or so from Jan Gillberg in which he sent a copy of an email from Nardone dated November 7.
... snip ...
Note how the stalker Nardone asks Jan Gillberg to provide information on my family by "publishing something".
As one can imagine, this relentless harassment and false reports have caused a great deal of distress for our family and relatives. After making contact with one of our relatives, Wadesky always reports back to Hufschmid, who is the person who started the rumor that we had been kidnapped in 2007. Hufschmid even has a webpage dedicated to the "mysterious disappearance of the Bollyn family".
Eric Hufschmid of Goleta, California, has worked to spread fear and sow suspicion about people in the 9/11 truth movement. He has spread lies about me since 2007 in order to marginalize my research and writing. He is evidently working for the other side - those who wish to confuse the public about what really happened on 9/11. The question is who is behind Hufschmid?
Hufschmid sent me two emails after Nardone was released in which he urged me to go visit his stalker/agent at the police station. This clearly shows that Hufschmid is the person running the stalking network. The police in Santa Barbara County have been notified of Hufschmid's involvement in this stalking and harassment.
From: "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org Cc: email@example.com Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 9:14 PM Subject: Please meet Alex at the police station!
Christopher, I realize that you don't know who to trust, and you don't know if that man who described himself as Alex can be trusted, but...
You told Alex that you don't go to public events because you don't get paid, so he will give you 100 Swedish Kronas to go to the police station and meet him!!! He can give you some more money later, if that is not enough.
You can bring that retired policeman, Curt, also, if you want. He traveled to your apartment on his own expenses, and he brought some extra money to help you and your family. However, his flight leaves Sweden very soon, so you don't have any time to fool around! Is there anyway you can be at that police station between 10 AM and 3 PM? Is there any way that you and your family can be at that police station between 10 AM and 3 PM? If so, let him know so that he will be there to meet you! You can e-mail him at this e-mail address, and CC me. alex dot wadesky at googlemail dot com
You can also verify and specify the location at the police station that you will meet him by using the Google Street view maps and including the link so that he can see exactly where you are going to be. Eric
The harassing telephone calls from Hufschmid and Nardone to my wife's father in Estonia disturbed him a great deal and are thought to have led to his sudden demise and premature death a year ago. Such repeated and vicious threats can cause older people to die.
Hufschmid and Nardone made a three-way conversation with Swedish police on 10 March 2011 in which they gave a false report to the police telling them that my son was in grave danger, although the personal ID number was mine. The Hufschmid-Nardone false report to the police resulted in a police visit to my house to check on our son. Hufschmid pretends not to know the real identity of Alex Wadesky although he has worked with him for years.
Wadesky has used numerous social networking sites to spread Hufschmid's nonsense about my family being kidnapped. The Facebook account with my photo under the name Alex Wadesky was removed after I contacted Facebook in October 2011.
Mario Nardone and Eric Hufschmid have created numerous webpages using my image, like this one on Myspace. The photo is of me at the train station in Berlin-Wannsee when war (Krieg) broke out between Georgia and South Ossetia in August 2008, but the purpose of the page is to spread vicious lies about me and my family.
These false pages all carry Hufschmid's lie that I have been kidnapped and that my kidnappers control what I write. The purpose of that lie is pretty clear - to discredit my 9/11 research that explains the role of Israeli and Zionist agents in the false-flag terror attacks. The fact that we lived with our relatives from August 2007-2009 doesn't stop Hufschmid from carrying on with this nonsense. He is paid to spread these lies. The real question is who is paying Hufschmid to do this?
We are in contact with the authorities to find out who this Mario Nardone really is and why he used a false name (Alex Wadesky) as he systematically harassed our relatives and stalked us. Does he have a criminal background? Is he working with a criminal organization - or the state? Who is Eric Hufschmid really working for as he manages his gang of informants and stalkers to harass the Bollyn family?
Gillberg, Jan, "The Bollyns in Gränna", DSM, No. 4 - 2007 (Malicious article in English published in Swedish language magazine; translator unknown; Gillberg does not speak English well.) http://www.dsm.nu/bollyns.html
Same malicious article (scroll down to "The Bollyns in Gränna", with photo he had snapped (and published in print magazine) while we were doing work in the yard: http://www.dsm.nu/jg_bloggen.html
How U.S. Military Intelligence Got Bollyn Banned from RMN
February 15, 2008
Note to Readers:
After 6 years, I have been permanently banned from posting on Rumor Mill News (RMN at www.rumormillnews.com ) after receiving email from a fictitious name writing from the U.S. Army Intelligence. The note began by specifically saying that the sender would recommend to Rayelan of RMN that I "not be allowed to post." The note came from the home of U.S. Army Intelligence at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. The note, which came through the RMN website, was a rather incoherent response to my critical article about the republishing of the anti-Islamic cartoons in Denmark.
The writer at Fort Huachuca, using the fictitious name "Herb Lane," began his Valentine's Day note thusly:
Personally I would recommend to Rayelan that you not be allowed to post.
I saw that this bizarre note was not really coming from a private citizen named "Herb Lane" but came from a U.S. military computer at the training center for U.S. Army Intelligence. As an American with a strong sense of the right of free speech, I was naturally incensed.
Valentine's Day is also my birthday and I understood this was my present from U.S. Army Intelligence, where Mark Lane of American Free Press also happened to begin his career.
I posted a quick note about this hate mail from U.S. Army Intelligence on Rumor Mill News under the title "Bollyn Receives Anti-Islamic Hate Mail from U.S. Army Intelligence."
The writer from Fort Huachuca exhibited the rabid anti-Islamic world view that has long contaminated the thinking of the U.S. military.
The writer from U.S. Army Intelligence is evidently on a first-name basis with Rayelan, who runs Rumor Mill News. In any case, Rayelan was very quick to heed his recommendation. Within hours of this posting I was permanently "decomissioned" from RMN.
When I discovered that I was unable to post on RMN, I wrote to Rayelan:
How odd. I am unable to log onto RMN the day after the U.S. Army Intelligence said I should be banned. Have I been banned from RMN? If not, how can I log on? Please advise.
Within hours I received this termination notice from Zapper, the webmaster at RMN:
...We appreciate your hard work and efforts over the years, even in the face of some pretty severe personal consequences you've endured.
The decision to decommision you, however, is final. - Zapper
The whole story will be posted on my website on Monday, February 18.
Now for the urgent story about SSRI anti-depressants and the latest tragic school shooting, this time by my home in Illinois...
The Real (Kosher) News Network and the 9/11 Cover Up
September 14, 2011
THE ZIONIST SLANT - The Real News Network is a Zionist-funded disinformation outfit founded by a couple orthodox Jews. The deceit is that it poses as an honest and unbiased source of news on the Internet.
Among the flurry of articles in the days and weeks leading up to the tenth anniversary of the false-flag terror attacks of 11 September 2001 were a number of articles about the legacy of 9/11. These were primarily pieces lamenting the unmitigated disaster of a decade ruined by illegal wars and the wholesale plundering of the U.S. economy. In "9/11 - The Reckoning" by the International Herald Tribune (NYT), for example, the cost of 9/11 is reckoned to be at least $3.3 Trillion. According to the tally done by the New York Times, the combined costs of 9/11, "homeland security" measures, and the illegal wars that followed in its wake, account for a full one-fifth of the total U.S. national debt, which has more than doubled to $14 Trillion since 2001. The false-flag terrorism attacks and the Zionist-led military and "security" response to 9/11 robbed the American people of the hope of prosperity that marked the beginning of the 21st Century. The "bankster" class of international financiers made a killing at the expense of the American nation.
While I certainly agree that 9/11 ushered in a decade of unbridled criminality and corruption, I wouldn't want to add to the chorus of laments. I would prefer to look ahead to a better decade in which the truth of 9/11 is finally revealed and those guilty for the terror attacks exposed and held accountable. This is, after all, the only way that we will be able to rectify the horrendous injustice of the past ten years and build a better future for our nation and our children.
I am not a partisan of any stripe and my research and writing about 9/11 is motivated solely by my fervent desire to find the truth of what really happened. In the interest of full disclosure and to help readers understand where I am coming from, I provide biographical information about myself in a section under the rubric "About Bollyn". I think it is important for readers to know who is behind the articles they read on Bollyn.com. This is, however, not the case with most "mainstream" and alternative news outlets, which seek to hide the fact that they are owned and controlled by Jews who are fervent and devoted supporters of Zionism and the state of Israel.
The Real News Network, founded by the Canadian Jew "Paul Jay", is one such outfit. "The Real News Network is a television news and documentary network focused on providing independent and uncompromising journalism," the network says about itself. "We are viewer supported and do not accept advertising, government or corporate funding," Jay says.
Paul Jay of the Real News Network
What he doesn't say about the Real News Network is that he founded the news network with his long-standing business partner David M. Ostriker, an Orthodox Jewish rabbi and founder of KosherTube.com, which includes Zionist big whigs Naomi Ostriker Seligman and her husband Ernest von Simson from Ostriker von Simsom on its founding committee. Naomi Ostriker is evidently related to one of the founders of the Real News Network.
Paul Jay's Internet news outlet was founded and directed by Rabbi Ostriker, which is why I have dubbed it the "Real Kosher News Network." The business plan for the Real News Network reveals a host of Zionist Jews on its board, e.g. Michael Ratner of Cleveland's Forest City Enterprises. The plan also reveals that Real News Network is dubiously registered as a "charity" in Canada and the United States, making donations to Jay's "kosher news network" tax-deductible.
The founders of the "Real News Network", Rabbi David M. Ostriker (left) and Paul Jay (right), have worked together for many years on films and the Canadian television network, the CBC. Here the producers of Return to Kandahar pose with Nelofer Pazira, the subject of the film. Ostriker and Jay are also the founders of the Hot Docs film festival.
It is important that viewers understand that the information they receive on the Real News Network has been through a selection process by devoted Zionist Jews to ensure that what is presented is "kosher" news. What the viewer of Real News is really consuming is a not so subtle form of Israeli propaganda, known in Hebrew as "hasbara". It will come as no surprise, for example, that not a single article I have written about 9/11 can be found on the Real News Network.
EHUD OLMERT'S SECRET VISIT TO TORONTO AND NEW YORK ON 9/11
Ehud Olmert, the extreme rightwing mayor of Jerusalem seen here with Ehud Barak in "Wanted" posters in Israel, was in Toronto on 9 September 2001. From Toronto, Olmert went to New York City where he is thought to have witnessed the terror spectacle of 9/11 before being flown out on an El Al flight in the afternoon following the attacks. Olmert's visit to Toronto and New York City on the eve of 9/11 has been kept secret by the Zionist-controlled media, including the Real News Network. Why?
Although the Real News Network is based in Toronto, they have not looked into the huge story about the secret visit of the Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak to Toronto on the eve of 9/11 - on September 9, 2001. As I wrote in my 2007 article entitled "Ehud Olmert's Secret Visit to New York on Eve of 9/11":
We know that Olmert spent September 9, 2001 in Toronto with the United Jewish Appeal for the beginning of its annual fundraising drive. This was reported in the Toronto Star on September 10, 2001.
So, it is clearly documented that Olmert, a right-wing supporter of Zionist terrorism and political ally of the Israeli criminals (e.g. Menachem Atzmon) who controlled passenger-screening operations at U.S. airports on 9-11, was in New York on September 10, 2001. Where was he on September 11, 2001?
Why has the Real News Network avoided the story of Olmert's visit to Toronto on the eve of 9/11? Olmert's visit to Toronto was supposedly to attend a fundraiser for Israel. The head of the UJC in 2001, the umbrella organization raising the funds for Israel was Charles Bronfman.
As Scott Thompson and Jeffrey Steinberg explain in their 2001 article, "Did 'Mega' Bucks Help Sharon Steal Israeli Elections?", the Canadian liquor billionaires Charles and Edgar Bronfman headed a small group of American and Canadian mega-billionaires, tied to organized crime and right-wing Zionist causes, which joined forces to get Ariel Sharon elected in 2001.
Avoiding and omitting such stories is one part of the task of the Zionist-controlled press. Another important function is to provide disinformation stories, which is something the Real News Network excels at. In the past week Paul Jay's kosher news network has presented a series of interviews about two supposedly "suppressed" stories: the role of Saudi Arabia in 9/11 and the "evidence" that Al Qaeda killed Rafik Hariri. Both stories reek of Israeli "hasbara", i.e. Zionist propaganda, designed to further the Zionist agenda by blaming Arab and Moslem groups for Zionist crimes of assassination and mass murder. Only by understanding the deeply Zionist character of Real News Network can the reader comprehend that its primary function is to be a source of subtle Zionist propaganda and disinformation. One must always consider the source of the political material one consumes.
Paul Jay (perhaps not his real name) is the nephew of Alan Herman, a.k.a. Ted Allan, a Canadian Jewish journalist who fought in the Spanish Civil War and fled to England with his wife, Kate Schwartz, during the McCarthy era. Ted Allan's son Norman has a website where he presents biographical information about Alan Herman and his family of Russian Jews. By reading just one chapter, "Beginnings", one can easily grasp that the family of Harry and Annie (Elias) Herman, Jewish immigrants from Russia, was an extremely dysfunctional family struggling with serious psychological disorders, child abuse, and incest. These problems are more common in the Jewish community than most people realize.
An investigative research project conducted by the Center for American Progress reveals that more than $42 million from seven foundations over the past decade have helped fan the flames of anti-Muslim hate in America. The authors worked to expose the Islamophobia network in depth, name the major players, connect the dots, and trace the genesis of anti-Muslim propaganda.
The money has flowed into the hands of five key “experts” and “scholars” who comprise the central nervous system of anti-Muslim propaganda: Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Robert Spencer, Daniel Pipes, and Steven Emerson.
These five “scholars” are assisted in their propaganda efforts by Brigitte Gabriel (founder, ACT! for America), Pamela Geller (co-founder, Stop Islamization of America), and David Horowitz (supporter of Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch).
As the report details, information is then disseminated through conservative organizations like the Eagle Forum, the religious right, Fox News, and politicians such as Allen West and Newt Gingrich.
Have patience awhile; slanders are not long-lived. Truth is the child of time; ere long she shall appear to vindicate thee. - Immanuel Kant
The worthiest people are the most injured by slander, as is the best fruit which the birds have been pecking at. - Jonathan Swift
For the past five years I have been subjected to an incredible amount of slander and defamation. Oddly, most of the defamation comes from two people with whom I was formerly associated, namely Eric Hufschmid and Michael Piper. Both of them lie about me with impunity with orders to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. They have both clearly been given orders to attack my credibility and kill me with ignominy.
In this respect Hufschmid and Piper act in the same way as Daryl Bradford Smith, who was recorded threatening Hufschmid and ordering him to "Slam Bollyn every way you can" in 2007. The similarity of their efforts indicates they are working under the same orders and most likely for the same agency. A sure indication of an agent is his ability to lie with impunity. It seems logical that it is not because my 9/11 research is flawed or incorrect that these three disinformation agents have been ordered to attack me -- but because it is correct and true.
The following is from the beginning of the 2007 conversation in which the agent Daryl B. Smith (DBS) rudely threatens and orders Eric Hufschmid (EH) to attack me every way he could. To listen to Smith screaming and swearing like a complete madman gives the listener some idea of the intensity of the vile and malicious effort to defame me. Smith, who is supported by Michael Piper as "a genuine anti-Zionist", is obviously under the influence of a very evil power.
DBS: Well, here's a deal. And this is between you and me, because we've been doing this a long time together. You have to come out and, and slam Bollyn every way you can, in my, in support of me. Every way you can. No compromise. If you don't, I want parting from our, from our relationship.
EH: But what do you mean, slam him?
DBS: I, whatever the f--k you need to do to make this son-of-a--- be crippled by the s--t he's doing. I'm talking about a full court press on this guy. I'm talking about whatever it is you know about him, whatever it is you can say about him, whatever it is you can do about him, you need to do now. And if you can't do that, Eric, we gotta go. I gotta go.
Although they have also attacked each other, Hufschmid, Smith, and Piper work in harmony in their attacks against me. Hufschmid and Piper both claim, for example, that I am under the control of Zionists and that they are the only true anti-Zionists. Hufschmid, for example, has claimed since 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Israeli Mossad. Based on this ridiculous claim, Hufschmid has ignored my 9/11 research for the past five years, such as my book Solving 9/11, saying that I am writing "Zionist bait" under the control of my kidnappers. I dealt with Hufschmid in an article entitled "Eric Hufschmid and Rupert Murdoch - Agents of Deception" written in October 2010.
Michael Piper, on the other hand, goes further and fabricates malicious lies about me and my wife in his relentless effort to defame me. As a veteran writer and senior officer at American Free Press, however, Piper's defamation is much more serious because he represents a newspaper and organization which many patriotic Americans believe in and support. It is for this reason that it is absolutely imperative for me to debunk and expose the falseness of the vicious lies of Michael Piper. By seeing how he is lying about an honest 9/11 researcher, one is able to understand Piper's role as an agent of the other side. A silver lining of the undercover police attack and malicious prosecution that I suffered in the corrupt courts of Cook County in 2007 is that through this ordeal Michael Piper and American Free Press were fully exposed as controlled opposition agents under the thumb of the Jewish lawyer, Mark Lane.
Michael Piper of American Free Press is paid to defame me with lies and disinformation. Exposing Piper's defamation is essential to understanding his role as a controlled disinformation agent.
As an independent journalist since June 2000, I have written about a number of significant and sensitive subjects. As a journalist with American Free Press, a weekly paper based in Washington, D.C., I wrote a great deal about the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 from the day of the attacks until October 2006. Then, suddenly, I was fired from AFP in early October 2006 after being attacked by three heavily-armed undercover police at my home in mid-August 2006.
Our police departments are being made adjuncts of the ADL's efforts to suppress dissent in America. Outspoken journalists such as Bollyn are the frontline targets. Don't let it happen in your town. - Michael Piper, "ADL Link to Bollyn Case", American Free Press, 27 August 2006
After the assault by the three-man tactical squad, which left me TASERed with a broken elbow, the populist paper I wrote for suddenly turned against me. This change was most obvious in the behavior of Michael Piper, a corporate officer of American Free Press. Two weeks after the assault on their star journalist, Piper demanded that the publisher, Willis Carto, refuse to allow me to attend the paper's annual conference, held in Washington D.C. over the Labor Day weekend. During 2005 and 2006, however, Piper had always introduced me to his radio audience as "America's best investigative journalist, bar none." Now, days after being attacked by a tactical team of undercover cops, Piper was demanding that "America's best investigative journalist" be barred from attending AFP's annual conference. How much sense does that make?
This was very odd to say the least and speaks volumes about the real nature of American Free Press. There I was, an American journalist who had done a great deal of original research on 9/11, beaten and TASERed at his home by a corrupt police force. There is a huge and very important story there. All of the things AFP warns its patriotic readers about had actually happened to their star reporter in the middle of the United States, but they did not want me talking about it at their annual conference. How very odd. Although I was not allowed to attend the conference this did not stop AFP from collecting thousands of dollars from their readership for my legal defense fund.
Michael Piper has continued to wage a relentless campaign of defamation against me ever since. Defamation is the act of damaging a person's reputation by saying or writing bad or false things about them. Today, nearly 5 years after I was fired from American Free Press, Piper continues to defame me. The first question is why? Why would an officer of a so-called patriotic newspaper go to such lengths to defame an independent 9/11 researcher? Piper is one of the controlling people at American Free Press. When I began working at the Liberty Lobby in the summer of 2000, Michael Piper would eat lunch at a local restaurant with Willis Carto, Mark Lane, and the accountant, Blayne Hutzel. As one of the corporate officers, Piper is allowed to sign checks from the various companies that control the funds for the organization.
Piper seeks to defame me by using lies to portray me as a Zionist agent who has sabotaged the 9/11 "movement". A Google search of my name, for example, brings up a webpage entitled "Christopher Bollyn - Agent Saboteur", just below the link to my own website Bollyn.com. The "Agent Saboteur" link brings the reader to a website called takeourworldback.com, which has a very large section devoted to defaming me and my investigative research on 9/11.
The most recent defamation on this site is called The Bollyn - Hufschmid - Murdoch "Coincidence", revised on July 17, 2011. This page begins by saying that I am a "suspected Zionist infiltrator" and a "proven liar" who uses a "a standard COINTELPRO tactic from the 1960s of smearing genuine activists as 'agents'."
The introduction, or Executive Summary, is very short but reveals a great deal about what is really going on at TakeOurWorldBack.com:
Two suspected Zionist infiltrators come on to the anti-Zionist 9/11 truth scene within a year of 9/11, both collaborate for years after 9/11 - from 2002 to 2007 at least, and both are using a standard COINTELPRO tactic from the 1960s of smearing genuine activists as "agents". Both of them are proven liars who promote disinformation and are a liability to the truth movement. And it turns out that both of these Judas Goats are connected to billionaire Zionist media mogul Rupert Murdoch.
According to attorney Brian Glick, the FBI used four basic methods for their COINTELPRO of the 1960s: Infiltration by agents and informers, psychological warfare from the outside, harassment through the legal system, and extralegal force and violence. His book, War At Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and What We Can Do About It, has the following description for infiltration (page 10):
1. Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents.
Glick points out how agents accuse genuine activists of the very deceptions that agents are themselves guilty of.
Covert Manipulation to Make A Legitimate Activist Appear to be an Agent: An actual agent will often point the finger at a genuine, non-collaborating and highly-valued group member, claiming that he or she is the infiltrator.
Although the author of takeourworldback.com is not known, Michael Piper is clearly the source and author of most of the material about me. He has crafted these lies about me, my wife, and others in an effort to discredit and defame me. Reading through the document, which I call "the Piper piece", it is clear that he is using projection, just as Brian Glick says agents will do. Agents accuse genuine activists of the very deceptions that agents are themselves guilty of.
GENUINE ACTIVIST vs AGENT
People who don't know me might be fooled into believing the lies of Michael Piper. This is, after all, what the people who control Piper want. He works very hard at spreading lies and disinformation about me because he is ordered to do so -- and is being paid for it. Using bald-faced lies mixed with facts, Piper spins a web of disinformation which he hopes the gullible reader will believe. Sowing suspicion about me and my work is the goal.
It needs to be said that this response is not a personal attack on Michael Piper. This is simply a much-needed response to his campaign of disinformation and defamation against me. There is nothing personal between me and Mike Piper. He is simply an agent of disinformation who poses as an American patriot. By attacking me Piper hopes to create suspicion and doubt in the reader's mind about me and my 9/11 research. The purpose is "to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters", as Glick says. This is what agents and informers do. I am the genuine activist and Piper is the agent seeking to smear me as an agent. There are so many lies in the Piper piece that I can't address each of them individually. I will try to expose the key lies in his tangled web of deception so that the reader can see who is telling the truth, and who is lying.
Piper claims that my wife and I were spying on him in Mexico in 1997. "In April of 1997, the Bollyn couple were tailing Mike Piper in Cancun, Mexico," the webpage says. Piper goes on to say that when he met us in May 2000 he realized that we were "the same couple" that had tailed him in Cancun in 1997. If Piper truly realized in 2000 that Helje and I had been trailing him in Mexico, why did he promote me to his listeners in 2006 as "America's best investigative journalist, bar none"? Piper was either deceiving his listeners in 2006, or he is lying about us having trailed him in Mexico. In either case, he is trapped in his own lies.
The idea that we were following Piper in Mexico is a complete fabrication. My wife Helje has never even been to Mexico, and I have not been there since the 1980s. My wife, who was pregnant for most of 1997, had her hands full raising our two-year old son. She certainly was not interested in following Michael Piper. After all, we did not even know who Michael Piper was in 1997. If he really believed that we had been tailing him in Mexico in 1997, why did he never mention this to me during the 6 years we worked together at AFP?
Piper also claims that my wife was a "nude model" and that we had shown him "her nude modelling photos". This is another lie. Helje worked as a professional model in Stockholm and Chicago, where we lived, but none of her work can be called nude modelling. The only photo that he could be referring to is one of Helje and our 10-month old son for a Stockholm traffic safety campaign billboard that encouraged drivers to use proper baby car seats for their children. This campaign was quite unusual because Sweden does not allow billboards along the highways. This photo was part of an official child safety campaign that used special billboards on 14 highway ramps around Stockholm in 1996 and 1997.
Guardian Angel or Child Car Seat?
The document claims that Helje has two Jewish names, Brand and Kaskel. Firstly, Brand is not Helje's name at all. Brand is the name of my mother's Swiss-born foster father. Kaskel may be a Jewish name but in the case of Helje's family they only took this name in 1938 during a campaign in the Republic of Estonia to encourage people with foreign-sounding names to take names that sounded more Estonian. Helje's father's family name was Klaassen, a name of Scandinavian origin. Her grandfather received 5 crowns for choosing the name Kaskel from a list of names.
Piper's disinformation piece also claims that my first wife was an "Israeli intelligence officer." This baseless claim is repeated throughout the piece as if it were a proven fact. The fact of the matter is that when she was drafted into the army, like all Israeli girls at age 18, Bosmat was assigned to work as a secretary, which was normal for a girl with her profile. She did not like working in the army and got married to get out. To call her an intelligence officer when there is absolutely no evidence to support this claim is dishonest.
The Piper piece also claims that I worked with Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. This is not true. I have always worked as an independent journalist. Hufschmid and Smith invited me to speak on their "French Connection" podcast as did many others. I was reluctant to speak with Smith because I had seen that he had already begun defaming me after I had visited him at his home in France.
Piper also takes rather normal things and spins them in a way to make me look suspicious. The fact that I travelled via Germany to go from Brussels to Smith's house in France leads Piper to all kinds of speculation. The simple fact of the matter is that there was a French rail strike at the time. I decided to use the German trains, which give extremely good value for travelling families, and then rent a car from Geneva. I also travel to Switzerland when I can because I enjoy visiting the country where some of my ancestors came from.
The Piper piece also makes a big deal of the fact that I met Rupert Murdoch when I was a ski guide at the Pine Creek Cookhouse near Aspen, Colorado. What Michael Piper or his fellow agent don't seem to understand is that the Pine Creek Cookhouse is a place that is frequented by many people like Murdoch. It was not at all unusual to see Hollywood stars and politicians in the dining room. Once I saw a short fellow at the workbench in the ski shop and wondered what he was doing. It turned out to be Michael Douglas. One of our regular visitors was Robert McNamara, who enjoyed back country skiing in the peaks above Aspen.
It is important to note that the Piper piece, which claims I am a "proven liar", promotes Piper and Smith as "genuine anti-Zionists". Smith revealed himself as an agent in 2007 when he was taped telling Hufschmid to "slam Bollyn every way you can." It is obvious that Piper and Smith are controlled by the same people and have the same orders -- "Slam Bollyn."
Daryl Bradford Smith, the anti-Bollyn agent, a.k.a. Daryl B. Setters
I only went ahead and spoke on the "French Connection" because I believed it was more important to get the information out about 9/11 than to refuse to participate. It is, however, utterly false to say that I was working with Hufschmid and Smith. It is more correct to say that they were using my research to bring attention to their show. Hufschmid did tell me about Sam Danner, who turned out to be a 9/11 hoaxer.
The Piper defamation piece says that I am responsible for the deception of Sam Danner, a person who apparently lied when he said that he had been at the Pentagon on 9/11. I had interviewed Sam Danner at length and found his testimony to be interesting and credible. I wrote two articles about Danner's testimony for American Free Press. Both articles included the necessary caveats, such as "if true" and "if accurate", etc. to warn the reader that the article was based on eyewitness testimony. "If his account is true" is how I introduced Danner's material. This lets the reader know that this is not factual, but a person's recollection. The reader is warned and can decide how credible he sounds.
Apart from outright lies, the Piper document claims that I am a "proven liar" because I have reported people saying things that were later challenged by another person or through another source. In these cases, however, Piper or his partner readily accept the veracity of the claim made by the other party and say this proves that I am lying. My report that Benjamin Chertoff, for example, who worked on Popular Mechanics "9/11 debunking" article, was related to Michael Chertoff, is said by Piper to be a lie because Benjamin has disputed what his mother told me on the phone. The Piper piece also misrepresents the Chertoff connection to 9/11 by completely ignoring the fact that Michael Chertoff, as Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division, played the key role in the 9/11 cover-up by supervising the federal non-investigation of 9/11 and the destruction of the crucial evidence. In this way the Piper piece seeks to protect Michael Chertoff. How odd.
When asked about the relationship with Michael Chertoff, Benjamin's mother told me "they are cousins", which is how I reported it. The Piper piece says that Benjamin said his mother had said "they might be distant cousins." This is certainly not what she told me, but the Piper piece takes the words of Benjamin Chertoff as true in order to present me as a liar. He does the same with the account of my arrest at the hand of the corrupt police of Hoffman Estates. By accepting the words of the police who attacked me as the complete truth, the Piper piece seeks to portray me as a liar, even when the dispatch timeline clearly supports my statements about the police conspiracy to injure me.
Another example is what I reported having been told by Mark Loizeaux about the discovery of molten metal at the base of the three collapsed towers of the World Trade Center:
AFP [Bollyn] asked Loizeaux about the report of molten steel on the site. "Yes," he said, "hot spots of molten steel in the basements." These incredibly hot areas were found "at the bottoms of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven [basement] levels," Loizeaux said. The molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed," Loizeaux said. He said molten steel was also found at 7 WTC, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon.
This is exactly what Mark Loizeaux told me during our telephone conversation in 2002. The Piper piece says that I have deliberately misquoted Loizeaux, which is a lie. I reported what Loizeaux told me in his own words. How would anyone know what Loizeaux said to me, other than myself and Mark Loizeaux? Furthermore, Loizeaux has never complained or claimed that what I reported about his comments was in any way incorrect. If I had misquoted Loizeaux I would expect to hear from him.
There are many lies about my arrest following the undercover police assault on me at my home in August 2006. The Piper piece, for example, claims that I lied when I said that I was thrown into a cell with no water and told to drink from the toilet. To prove that I am lying, the Piper piece shows a jail cell in Hoffman Estates with a toilet and sink. In my case, I asked for water because I was very thirsty and no water came from the tap when the button was pushed above the sink. The water flow had evidently been turned off. The Hoffman Estates police lied in court about everything that happened when they assaulted me at my home in August 2006.
One point that the Piper piece brings out is the fact that the ambulance and fire department were dispatched to my house about three minutes before the plain clothes tactical unit even arrived on the scene. This is supported by the official dispatch timeline and the fact that my wife saw the ambulance parked near our house when she stopped the undercover police coming up our driveway. The ambulance had been sent to my home to be prepared for an unknown medical emergency nearly three minutes before the undercover unit arrived.
My wife, who confronted the three plainclothes men wearing body armor coming up our driveway, saw the ambulance and fire truck in front of a neighbor's house, about 100 feet away. The fire department vehicles had been dispatched to our home at 20:01:06 while the undercover tactical unit only arrived on the scene at 20:03:56. The fire department vehicles were logged in as being on the scene at 20:03:57, only one second after the arrival of the undercover cops. This is due to the fact that the ambulance, which had been dispatched for an "unknown medical emergency", only had to travel two blocks from its station to my house.
The Piper piece also misrepresents the police response to my 911 call. I had called 911 because I had seen a suspicious vehicle with three heavily-armed men prowling around my house for two nights in a row. I pondered calling the police for a while after I had discussed the situation with my wife. What was so alarming to us was the fact that the three plainclothed men approached our house in a threatening manner. As we found out later, the tactical squad had hijacked the response to the 911 call and ordered the uniformed officer not to respond.
A 2006 brochure from the Village of Hoffman Estates encouraged residents to call 911 "when in doubt"...
advising residents to call 911 "whenever you need police or fire service."
"Something is obviously wrong", the Piper piece says about the ambulance being dispatched before the arrival of the police:
Has there ever been a single example in human history where bent cops planned to attack someone, and helpfully called the paramedics to come to the aid of their victim in advance - thereby voluntarily providing evidence that would incriminate themselves and could be used to prove their victim's innocence in a court of law?
Yes indeed, there is something very, very wrong with the undercover police assault on Christopher Bollyn, an American journalist, at his home in August 2006. What I discovered is evidence of a police conspiracy to injure or kill an American for exercising his Constitutional rights, which is a serious federal crime. This is why I realized that my chances of winning in the Zionist-controlled courts of Cook County were extremely slim. Had I won and been found not guilty, I would have been in an excellent position to sue the police and expose their crimes and the people who were behind their attack on me. With his lies, Piper is obviously protecting the corrupt police.
The police report claimed that they smelled alcohol on my breath -- from a distance of three meters. If there was any suspicion that I was intoxicated why did the police not do a simple breath analysis like they do for drivers? They were, after all, traffic police. The only reason I was not tested for alcohol is because there was no indication of intoxication. Rather than test me, the police used lies to try and defame me. They certainly had the means to test me, given the presence of 7 police cars, one ambulance, and a fire truck at my house that evening. Why didn't they?
The entire incident was recorded on police videotapes in the 7 police cars that came to my house. Like the crucial steel from the World Trade Center, the video evidence of the police action at my home was "recycled" by the police department in clear violation of their own regulations and my written request to preserve all the evidence. Why would the police destroy the evidence? Why was the steel from the World Trade Center destroyed?
Why has Michael Piper taken the side of the corrupt police and engaged in a defamation campaign against me for the past five years? It is certainly not because what I have written about 9/11 is wrong. If my analysis and reporting about 9/11 were inaccurate and flawed why would Piper spend so much time attacking me and my wife rather than arguing the facts about what really happened on 9/11?
I trust in the intelligence of my readers to be able to discern what is true and what is false. Michael Piper is clearly involved in spreading malicious lies and disinformation about me. More importantly, what does this say about the integrity of the outfit he is working for?
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Refute Judy Wood's Theory
May 13, 2011
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have published an article refuting the theory put forward by Dr. Judy Wood that a directed energy weapon (DEW) was responsible for bringing down the Twin Towers. I am familiar with this theory having written about it early on after meeting with a former East German agent who admitted to having worked for the Mossad. This theory is clearly disinformation used to divert people from understanding how a highly energetic (i.e. explosive) coating of super-thermite (a bi-layered thermitic material made using nano-technology) was used to pulverize the 220 acre-sized concrete floors of the World Trade Center. All that remained of the Twin Towers was steel and dust, according to Robert A. Kelman of Hugo Neu, the company that managed the destruction of 250,000 tons of WTC steel. The steel and the dust should have gone through forensic testing by the FBI, but the FBI allowed the steel to be hastily removed and destroyed in Asian smelters. A thorough examination of the dust would have revealed the presence of a large amount of active thermitic material, which is what caused the pulverization of the concrete.
Note: I do not agree on the authors' analysis that falling steel caused the huge crater in WTC 6, the U.S. Customs House. I believe there was a powerful explosion detonated in the basement of the building, to destroy the evidence that the federal vault had been cleaned out the night before.
MSNBC pulled the article that contained a vicious libel against me shortly after I contacted the network. Here is the email correspondence between me and Gina Stikes of Media Relations at MSNBC:
To: Gina Stikes Subject: MSNBC Libels Christopher Bollyn
MSNBC.com has published an article that contains a blatant libel against me. I understand that while MSNBC has not produced the article, by publishing it on the Internet MSNBC has commited a prosecutable offense.The libelous statement is found in this article, entitled "We're Learning More About Kevin Harpham & The Dramatic Arrest": http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42012541
The statement that concerns me is the following: "Leading anti-Semites, including Christopher Bollyn, have suggested that Jews were responsible for 9/11."
This statement is a case of malicious libel. It is not true, as I am not an anti-Semite nor have I ever been. Furthermore, it is malicious because it is meant to harm me as a journalist. It does not even seem to fit into the context of the article and appears to be a case of intentional libel.
I contacted KHQ-TV in Spokane over the weekend and they pulled the piece from their website immediately. I would hope that MSNBC would do the same or remove the libelous statement from the article. I intend to defend my name to the full extent of my ability. Please let me know what MSNBC intends to do about this libelous statement.
Thank you for your consideration of my request.
Gina Stikes of MSNBC responded:
I did follow up. MSNBC does not believe the article is libelous. But to amicably resolve this dispute, we have removed it from our website.
MSNBC (a joint venture between Microsoft and NBC Universal) and the NBC-TV affiliate in Spokane, Washington, KHQ-TV, committed a serious libel against me on their websites, MSNBC.com and KHQ.com. In a March 10 news article about a suspected terror bomber in Spokane entitled, "We're Learning More About Kevin Harpham & The Dramatic Arrest", they commited a prosecutable libel against me by publishing this comment:
"Leading anti-Semites, including Christopher Bollyn, have suggested that Jews were responsible for 9/11."
Calling an honest investigative journalist an "anti-Semite" is a clear case of libel. To libel a person is to publish in print, writing, or broadcast an untruth which is intended to harm that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. I am not an anti-Semite, nor have I ever been one, and it is libel to say in print that I am.
Agents of the 9/11 cover-up constantly seek to marginalize my 9/11 research and writing by claiming that I am anti-Semitic. In this way they aim to discredit my work by portraying it as the product of an irrational anti-Semite, which it is not. A person who criticizes Israeli war crimes, for example the military assault on the helpless population of Gaza during Christmas 2008, cannot be called an anti-Semite for doing so, but defenders of Zionist crimes rely on that charge to attack such critics. My investigation concerns the evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.
CNN asked me about this during an interview in January 2007 and I stated clearly that I am not an anti-Semite. By inserting a segment with a spokesperson from the Anti-Defamation League immediately after I said that, CNN tried to give viewers the impression that critics of Zionist crimes are really anti-Semites, which is nonsense. Investigating the evidence of who is really behind the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 does not make one an anti-Semite. The evidence doesn't lie. Zionist Jews and Israelis, like Michael Chertoff, played key roles in covering up the truth of 9/11. Investigating their involvement in the cover-up does not make me an anti-Semite. Branding me as one because of my research on the Israeli/Zionist connection to 9/11 is simply a propaganda device to try to marginalize my research and writing.
The libelous article, which has been spread around the world on the Internet, appears to have been written by the Southern Poverty Law Center and was posted on the MSNBC.com website at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42012541
I am considering legal action against the authors, the station, the webite, and the owners of these outlets for this egregious libel against me. The KHQ station is owned by the Cowles Publishing Company, which is a powerful family-owned company that operates the Inland Empire Paper Company, television stations in Washington and California, and who has extensive interests in real estate, insurance, marketing and financial services. It would certainly not be an easy task to sue them but it needs to be pointed out that what they have done in publishing this libel is wrong.
I called KHQ on Saturday and let them know that I was serious about defending my name against this libel. KHQ immediately pulled the piece, but it remained on MSNBC.com until I contacted the network and the article was pulled on March 15. The following is the complete text:
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: So who is the suspect accused of building a "weapon of mass destruction" and planting it along the route of a Martin Luther King Jr. Day unity parade route?
The emerging picture suggests 36-year-old Kevin William Harpham is a "lone wolf'' with a military ordnance background and apparently increasingly extreme radical-right views that may have prompted the attempt to carry out a mass murder on the late civil rights leader's birthday. He is also a man who has joined a neo-Nazi group, apparently posted to racial extremist websites and worried that the 9/11 attacks were actually a government conspiracy.
The domestic terrorism suspect faces the possibility of life in prison if convicted of the initial two charges he faces: attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction and possession of an improvised explosive device. Other federal charges could come when a federal grand jury in Spokane reviews the case on March 22.
"This one is very serious," federal defender Roger Peven said outside the courtroom, moments after he was appointed to represent Harpham.
The backpack bomb, reportedly containing shrapnel dipped in rat poison to enhance bleeding, was spotted moments before hundreds of people were to march by it. Authorities rerouted the parade immediately.
At some risk, a bomb squad defused the device and kept it intact — likely leading the FBI to capture a windfall of forensic evidence, possibly including fingerprints and DNA that could have identified Harpham as the suspect.
The affidavit of probable cause used to affect the suspect's arrest is sealed from public inspection — another indication of the secrecy surrounding the 51-day investigation by the FBI's Inland Northwest Joint Terrorism Task Force.
Despite the official secrecy, Hampton has left Internet fingerprints and other public records that give a glimpse of him.
Internet postings believed to be those of the former Army artillery soldier suggest he had an interest in old cars, metal fabrication, the neo-Nazi National Alliance and conspiracy theories associated with the attack on the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.
Harpham, who was raised Stevens County in the rural northeast corner of Washington state, was a member of the National Alliance in late 2004, the Southern Poverty Law Center revealed yesterday.
He also lived in Spokane from 1999 to 2004 and in East Wenatchee, Wash., from 2004 to 2006. His parents live near Kettle Falls, another Stevens County community, not far from Harpham's home in Addy, Wash.
A man using the name "Kevin Harpham" posted a message in 2008 on the anti-Semitic Vanguard News Network, operated by Alex Linder of Kirksville, Mo., himself a former member of the National Alliance.
On another Web site, Harpham posted that he watched the video "Loose Change" — popularized by the antigovernment "Patriot" group We Are Change — that the U.S. government was behind the attacks of Sept. 11.
Leading anti-Semites, including Christopher Bollyn, have suggested that Jews were responsible for 9/11.
On the "Loose Change" Facebook page, there are references to a "Zionist connection" and links to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion — a famous forgery that is a touchstone for the neo-Nazi right, including the late founder of the Aryan Nations, Richard Butler, who accuse Jews of plotting to control the world.
"I typically don't buy into these conspiracies, then my friends told me to watch this video called ‘Loose Change,'" Harpham posted on another website forum devoted to steam automobiles.
"Some of the stuff was speculation but overall it changed my opinion greatly,'' the Harpham posting said.
Harpham served in the U.S. Army in 1996-97, when records suggest he was part of the 1st Battalion, 37th Field Artillery Regiment at Fort Lewis, Wash.
It's not been public divulged if Harpham's military training includes exposure to improvised explosive devices like those encounter by soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan — and like the one found sitting on a corner park bench in downtown Spokane on Jan. 17.
During Harpham's time in the U.S. Army, as the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Report first reported in 2006, military investigators identified 320 extremists in the Army ranks at Fort Lewis, the sprawling military base near Tacoma in western Washington. (Eventually, the Pentagon tightened its rules in response to that and subsequent articles in the Report.)
It's not known if Harpham shared antigovernment, anti-Semitic or racist views during his time in the military.
In media interviews Wednesday, various people who knew or lived near Harpham's isolated mobile home at Addy, Wash., described him as a loner and not overly neighborly.
Once FBI agents identified him as a suspect, they weren't taking chances.
A SWAT team of agents was brought to Spokane in advance of the Wednesday's early morning arrest of the suspect.
Armed FBI agents, using Stevens County road department equipment, appeared to be working on a road near a narrow bridge as Harpham left his residence.
According to various media accounts, as Harpham's vehicle slowed for the construction workers, a "flash-bang" device commonly used by SWAT teams as a distraction, was fired through one of the car's windows.
In no time, Harpham was arrested without incident and whisked to the U.S. Courthouse in Spokane, about 52 miles away.
Other FBI agents then served a search warrant and spent the day combing Harpham's residence for evidence that could be tied to the backpack bomb.
Authorities were mum about what they found.
In court, Harpham appeared a bit bedraggled, dressed in blue jeans and a gray "Wells Fargo-Petty Racing" shirt. He made his initial appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Cynthia Imbrogno.
Looking like he hadn't shaved for a few days, Harpham poured himself glasses of water and didn't look around the crowded courtroom during the brief proceeding.
He told the judge he understood his constitutional rights to remain silent, the charges against him, the possible penalties and asked the court to appoint a public defender.
Peven, chief trial counsel for the Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington and Idaho, and Assistant Federal Defender Kim Deater appeared to represent Harpham.
Peven told the judge Harpham would waive his right to have a bail hearing within three days, meaning he will be held in federal custody.
The federal defender can attempt at a later date to request a bail hearing, but Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Harrington is expected to argue that Harpham is either a flight risk or danger to the community, or both, and should not be released under any circumstances.
"Hollywood Basterds" by David Duke
January 18, 2011
David Dukehas an excellent video entitled "Hollywood Basterds" about the evil and depraved film Inglourious Basterds.
Inglourious Basterds is an extremely violent and perverse anti-German film...
starring Brad Pitt...
and produced by Harvey Weinstein, who also made Fahrenheit 9/11, the Michael Moore film about 9/11 in which the dancing Israelis and other evidence of Israeli involvement are not even mentioned. Small surprise that Moore's agent is Rahm Emanuel's brother, the son of a real-life Israeli terrorist who came to the United States in the 1950s.
This extremely violent and sadistic anti-German film was made by the Weinstein brothers, Universal, Quentin Tarantino and Lawrence Bender. (Harvey and Bob Weinstein also made Fahrenheit 9/11 with Michael Moore, whose Hollywood agent happens to be Rahm Emanuel's brother Ari.) Duke, the author of an excellent book entitled Jewish Supremacism, points out that the real purpose of the Hollywood Basterds behind this film and others like it, is to demoralize and desensitize Western youth.
Note of Condolence: I read on David Duke's website that his beloved companion, Torri, passed away on January 16. My sincere condolences to David on the loss of his dear friend.
Torri, David Duke's beloved Maltese, passed away on 16 January 2011.
Rest in Peace, Torri is a page written in remembrance of David's faithful friend of nearly 18 years.
Faithful to the end - A forlorn dog refuses to leave the muddy graveside of his owner who was killed in the floods that brought devastation to Brazil, killing more than 630 people. Loyal pet Leao was photographed after spending a second day waiting for Cristina Maria Cesario Santana, who died in the Teresopolis region. Source - Daily Mirror
The Self-Sacrifice of Real Truthseekers and Whistleblowers
November 19, 2010
Self-sacrifice is a good testimony of truthfulness. - Roy Tov, The Cross of Bethlehem
Taking full advantage of a school holiday, we were in Berlin during the first week of November. Having lived in Wannsee for several years, my children were delighted to see old friends and go "trick or treating" in the enclave of Steinstücken, where the locals really know how to celebrate Halloween. We also visited our good friend Jutta Rabe, who has worked many years on digging for the truth of what really happened to the Baltic ferry Estonia, which sank on September 28, 1994, with more than 852 lives lost.
Jutta Rabe's book on the unexplained sinking of Estonia was a best seller in Germany...
...which she then made into a film.
Like other truthseekers, Jutta has paid an enormous price for her work. She was a producer of television journalism for Spiegel when Estonia sank in 1994, but was unexpectedly fired when her research went too deeply into the matter. Although Rabe wrote a best-selling book on the sinking of Estonia and later even made a film, she now faces eviction from her home of 23 years (on December 1) with the loss of some $250,000 of equity she has invested.
Jutta Rabe organized a dive to the wreck of Estonia and found evidence of explosions. Although the wreck lies in international waters, Sweden charged Rabe of having violated a Swedish law.
Because of her ground-breaking work to expose the sordid saga behind the sinking of Estonia, Jutta has been dragged through the courts and seen her movie company bankrupted and her home taken from her. We too have paid a huge price (and forced to become exiles) for our work on Estonia and 9-11. We barely escaped being killed in the winter of 2008 while presenting evidence about the sinking in three cities of Estonia. This is what happens to real truthseekers and whistleblowers in a world in which criminal gangs run our nations.
Jutta Rabe's note to the Bollyns who were involved in the Baltic Storm film.
WHY DOES THE NOBEL COMMITTEE IGNORE MORDECHAI VANUNU?
A prominent whistleblower who has paid a huge price for his efforts for world peace is the Israeli Mordechai Vanunu, who converted to Christianity in the process. In 1986 Vanunu revealed evidence of Israel's secret nuclear weapons arsenal, an illegal program which was developed largely through the efforts of Shimon Peres. Guess which one received the Nobel Peace Prize?
Mordechai Vanunu, in the garden of St. George's Anglican Church in Jerusalem, was kidnapped by the Mossad and spent 18 years in prison after revealing the existence of Israel's nuclear weapons arsenal to the British Sunday Times. Despite having served his full sentence (including 11 years in solitary confinement) Vanunu is still not allowed to leave Israel or meet with foreign journalists. Christopher Bollyn was the first American journalist to interview Vanunu in July 2004 after his release from prison.
Shimon Peres (center) received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1994, along with Yasir Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin. It is extremely odd that the peace prize was given to Peres, the father of Israel's illegal and unregulated nuclear arsenal - the greatest threat to peace in the Middle East.
Mordechai Vanunu, an Israeli Christian, is considered by many to be "the preeminent hero of the nuclear era". Vanunu is the Israeli whistleblower who revealed the secrets of Israel's nuclear weapons arsenal to the international media in 1986. Vanunu, who is still not allowed to leave Israel, has sacrificed many years of his life in prison (11 years in solitary confinement) because of his dedication to peace. Why has he not been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize? What does this say about the Nobel Committee?
The Sunday Times of October 5, 1986, ran Mordechai Vanunu's nuclear disclosure story on its front page under the headline: "Revealed: the secrets of Israel's nuclear arsenal."
Roy Tov, i.e. the Good Shepherd, is a former Israeli military officer, who like Vanunu converted to Christianity. Tov, who was also involved in high-level scientific programs, was compelled to leave Israel but found himself pursued by assassins of the Mossad in South East Asia. Tov has written a fascinating book about Israeli society and the Mossad entitled The Cross of Bethlehem - The Memoirs of a Refugee.
The Cross of Bethlehem reveals the realities of Israeli society and the Mossad as seen by an intelligent Israeli military officer who converted to Christianity and found himself pursued across Asia by the Mossad.
Having read The Cross of Bethlehem, I contacted Tov and asked him if he thought that Mordechai Vanunu deserves the Nobel Peace Prize.
Peres winning of the prize is worth a prize in itself: it was a masterpiece of the Shin Beth and largely considered as undeserved even by the Israeli public.In my context, Vanunu is a hot topic. His brave act has been used later by the Mossad for disinformation purposes in a variety of ways. Strangely enough, so many years after the event he is hotter than ever. If allowed to give a public interview he'll disclose the disinformation work of the Mossad. Thus he won't be allowed to reach Sweden (or Norway).
Rather than giving the peace prize to a person, like Vanunu, who has sacrificed his life for world peace, the Nobel Committee is giving this year's prize to a Chinese dissident. The Nobel Committee says that this year's peace prize to Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo could go down in history as "one of the most important" ever awarded.
The 2010 Nobel Peace Prize also risks sticking out for being the only one in the award's more than 100-year history where the laureate or a representative is unable to come to receive the honour in Oslo, because of Beijing's uncompromising stance, the committee's secretary said.
"This could perhaps be one of the most important prizes in the history of the Nobel Committee," Geir Lundestad said in an interview at the Nobel Institute in Oslo.
What would happen if they awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to Mordechai Vanunu? Why is Israel's arsenal of nuclear weapons being ignored by the committee in Oslo? If the Nobel Committee is serious about world peace, why have they refused to acknowledge Vanunu's incredible sacrifice for peace?
Mass media is the most powerful tool used by the ruling class to manipulate the masses. It shapes and molds opinions and attitudes and defines what is normal and acceptable. - "Mind Control Theories and Techniques used by Mass Media"
The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. - Edward Bernays, Propaganda
The real rulers of our society (i.e. the financial elite and military) and the controlled media work together to keep the population under their control. The man (financial elite) needs the dog (the media) to shape public opinion to suit its agenda.
As a patriotic American who is deeply dismayed by the lack of resistance to the lies of 9/11 and the criminal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, I sometimes ask myself why Americans seem so apathetic in the face of such blatant injustice and evil. Either they don’t care or they are unable to see past the lies is the first logical explanation that comes to mind, but that just doesn’t make sense. Most Americans I know are very patriotic and deeply concerned about their nation. Most are able to discern fact from fiction. So what has hijacked their patriotism, corrupted their thinking, and prevents them from comprehending the outrageous criminal deception of 9/11 -- and standing up against it?
For most Americans, and other people living in modern developed societies, the mass media is the final arbiter of reality. While many Americans may have serious doubts and questions about 9/11, they believe in the “free press” and await the day the mass media will embrace the facts and evidence of what really happened. That day, however, will never come, at least not until the nexus between the military and the mass media is broken. In the absence of this correction most people will remain captive in the media's "Auschwitz of the mind," stupefied by its mind control and unable to resist the bold-faced lies of the government.
When we talk about "mind control," images of drugged and hypnotized assassins like Sirhan Sirhan may come to mind, but the process by which the media controls our minds is really very ordinary; it is as omnipresent and common as the television set in every American home.
Sirhan Sirhan, a Palestinian, was charged with the murder of Bobby Kennedy and was the only prisoner in Soledad kept incommunicado. Sirhan was clearly not the real assassin because the fatal bullets were fired from directly behind Kennedy into his skull (right mastoid), while Sirhan was shooting from several meters in front of the senator.*
Unlike most Americans of my age, I grew up without a television and have never owned one, so I hardly ever watch TV. Prior to my recent visit to Berlin, I hadn’t seen any television since watching the World Cup last summer. Nor do I listen to the radio.
When we visited Berlin in November, I had access to a television and watched the news on CNN and BBC World. With the 600 billion dollar quantitative easing (QE2) announced by the Federal Reserve, and the discovery of terror bombs coming from Yemen, there was certainly no shortage of news. What really disturbed me, however, was the utter shallowness of the discussion and the conspicuous omission of key facts.
On November 4, I bought the Financial Times and New York Times to see how these well-respected newspapers would report the Fed’s creation of 600 billion dollars out of thin air. Both papers simply said that the Fed “would buy an additional $600 billion in long-term Treasuries by the end of June 2011,” but nowhere did they describe how this buying of debt really works. For that, one would have to read The Web of Debt by Ellen Hodgson Brown, or a similar book that discusses how the Fed really works by creating debt to enslave the American people.
The most blatant mind control tactics were seen in the coverage of the Yemeni terror bombs that had supposedly been sent to some unnamed Jewish organization in Chicago. Photographs of the interior of the explosive-laden computer printer revealed the bomber’s return address. The evil genius who made the bomb had left the sticker with the serial number in plain sight, allowing government sleuths to track the bomb to Al Qaida in Yemen. The face of the suspected Arab culprit was then shown on the screen. The mind control exercise was complete. The fanatic Muslim fear button had been pushed once again.
Meanwhile, there were horrendous terror bombings in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, in which hundreds of people were killed, and daily reports of C.I.A. missile strikes in Pakistan. The wicked asymmetry of the War on Terror could not be more obvious. The bombs sent to Islamic countries under U.S. occupation always cause huge numbers of casualties but are never investigated, while the bombs they send to us usually fail to detonate but make the headlines and are used to instill fear in the public. To be exposed to such mind-numbing propaganda was truly disturbing and left me feeling distinctly uneasy.
Our cat, Dusty, on his line in the garden in Wannsee.
Our cat was also glad to be back in Berlin and demanded to go out at all hours of the night. I had to get up in the wee hours and let him out on his line and keep an eye on him. One morning, I came across a movie on television about a town in California that was being mind-controlled by an evil doctor that used medications and broadcast frequencies to control the minds of everybody in the town. In American films the good guys always win. In the end of this film the good guy exposed the evil doctor, got everyone off the drugs, knocked down the mind-control transmitter, and won the love of the beautiful Canadian girl.
We are not unlike the people in that movie (titled Perfect Little Angels) in that we unwittingly subject ourselves to mind control whenever we watch television, which for most of us is a daily habit. The not-so-subtle mind control of the mass media is included in the full range of media products consumed by Americans on a daily basis. So refined is the government/military propaganda machine in the United States that people actually spend billions of their hard-earned dollars buying the media products that are used to control their minds. How crazy is that?
WHAT IS MIND CONTROL?
My Concise Oxford Dictionary defines “mind” as one’s opinion, direction of thoughts, or way of thinking and feeling. The mind control aspect of the mass media is the way information is twisted and becomes propaganda designed to shape the opinion of the viewer, reader, or listener in such a way that the person becomes indoctrinated to accept government policies.
I saw very clearly how the media does this after the undercover police assault at my home in 2006. An outside editor from Time magazine was hired to edit and twist a 170 word article in the Chicago Tribune about my arrest to give the reader an utterly false impression of who I am and what had actually happened when three heavily-armed undercover police invaded my home, broke my right arm, and tortured me with a TASER in front of my 8-year-old daughter. Such things don't happen in America, do they?
The Bollyn children were profoundly disturbed by what they saw when their father was brutally assaulted by undercover police at their home outside Chicago.
The controlled media, for example, never referred to me as a journalist, which was my profession and had been for 6 years. In order to give the viewer the impression that I was an anti-Semite and a liar CNN used the magic of video editing. CNN then broadcast this slanderous and biased material the night before my trial was set to begin in January 2007. If my analysis of 9/11 is wrong, why would the Zionist-controlled national media go to such lengths to slander me?
The Rothschild-funded Zionist cabal that has monopoly control of the U.S. mass media has created that monopoly for one reason: to control the media of a nation is to control the nation. It's that simple.
Walter Lippmann, the Jewish journalist and author of Public Opinion (1922), explained the "manufacture of consent" as the manipulation of public opinion to accept the agenda of the elite. We need to realize that the agenda of the elite means enslaving us, stealing our money, and sending us off to fight their wars of conquest. Mind control and propaganda are the tools used by the elite to control our thinking. We need to be aware of how the media uses these tactics so we can protect our minds, our families, and our nation.
* In the official medical report, Dr. Thomas Noguchi concluded that the bullet entering Kennedy's right mastoid and penetrating the brain was the cause of death. It was Dr. Noguchi's expert opinion, given in testimony at the investigation, that the fatal bullet was fired at a range of not more than two or three inches from Kennedy's head. However, no witness who testified ever placed Sirhan any closer to the Senator than two feet during the time he was firing his pistol. http://www.beyondweird.com/conspiracies/rfk.html
Helen Thomas on the Zionist-Controlled Media & Israel
January 21, 2011
CNN recently interviewed the veteran White House reporter Helen Thomas. Thomas explains her comments about the Israeli occupation of Palestine that got her fired and why American journalists will never discuss Israel or Israeli politics in a realistic and critical way. "Don't touch the third rail, which is Israel," she said, discuss Israel in an honest way and you commit career suicide. "I could call Obama anything in the book and no one would say anything," she said, "you touch one thing about Israel and you're finished." This is a very interesting interview with a remarkable woman.
The Swedish Plot to Criminalize Julian Assange and WikiLeaks
November 22, 2010
WANTED - The Swedish media have joined in the government's campaign to criminalize Julian Assange of WikiLeaks. This poster, which reads "Wanted - Julian Assange refuses to turn himself in" was placed on the boxes containing Sweden's free Metro newspaper on November 19, 2010.
WHY IS SWEDEN TREATING ASSANGE LIKE A CRIMINAL?
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is now facing an international arrest warrant issued by Swedish police for having allegedly annoyed or molested two women in Sweden. The charges, which are very nebulous, stem from complaints made by two anonymous women about one week after the supposed encounters occurred. If the allegations of rape are true, Assange could face two years in a Swedish prison. What's really going on? And why is Sweden, a country that supposedly cherishes freedom of the press, persecuting Assange, a true champion of press freedom in the 21st Century? Is this another example of malicious prosecution?
Assange was recently denied a permanent residency permit in Sweden, although the authorities refused to provide the reasons for their unusual denial of the permit. This is very odd because Sweden is known for giving residency and citizenship to terrorists and mass murderers. I know this is true because I met a long-time Swedish resident who personally murdered scores of Palestinians in the Sabra and Shatila massacres of 1982. Sweden is a country that welcomes mass murderers but refuses to give a residency permit to a well known genius with incredible talents and integrity. Furthermore, Sweden recently refused to prosecute Joachim Posner, the Bernard Madoff of Scandinavia, who disappeared with millions of crowns of investors money in 1997 and who has been living in Brussels, the center of the European Union, under his own name. What's going on in Sweden, where the sordid sexual affairs of the king are openly discussed in a best-selling book while 80 percent of the public thinks the king has a right to a scandalous private life?
We have to remember that Assange and WikiLeaks are acting as war reporters on the Internet, the new global news medium. Assange has simply provided the public with important first-hand documents from the war, information which is not provided by the Zionist-controlled press. The majority of the U.S. media outlets are owned by six Zionist-controlled networks like Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. The Zionist-controlled media monopoly was created in order to shape public opinion in favor of the Zionist war agenda in the Middle East. Using basic mind control techniques they have persuaded most Americans to support the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Since the 1980s, ownership of the U.S. media has become consolidated in such a way that only 5 Zionist-controlled corporations own a majority of the media outlets. When Murdoch's News Corporation is factored in this majority is greatly increased. The only voice being heard by American consumers of mass media is that of militant Zionist extremism. This is the main reason why so few Americans have the anti-war worldview of the Viet Nam War era. Waging criminal wars has become acceptable to most Americans. (Source: Mind Control Theories and Techniques Used by Mass Media)
WikiLeaks has provided essential information about the criminal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that the U.S. government and military wanted to keep away from the public. While the controlled media ignores the most pertinent fact that the U.S.-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are both criminal wars of aggression, the WikiLeaks documents provide undeniable evidence of a whole raft of war crimes committed by U.S. forces in both countries. Rather than pillorying Assange on spurious sexual allegations from anonymous women, the Swedish and global media should be calling for criminal charges against those political leaders, current and former, who have engaged in planning, conspiring, and waging illegal wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq. The evidence of numerous war crimes, including torture and mass murder, is on the table and demands to be acted upon. To ignore the abundant evidence of war crimes committed by U.S. officials and politicians is to ignore the most fundamental international humanitarian law and that means the end of Western civilization and the rule of law.
The Obama administration is escalating the criminal war in Afghanistan by sending in tanks that can destroy a house from a mile away. Why do Americans allow this madness to continue? What are we really fighting for in Central Asia?
In an open and democratic society the press is supposed to ferret out exactly the kind of information WikiLeaks has exposed. In a free and open society people like Julian Assange are supported and honored for their service to the public. If anything, Assange deserves a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. Why are the Swedes supporting the war agenda in the Middle East in the first place? What happened to the Sweden of the 1960s that opposed the war in Viet Nam?
Answer: It was killed along with Olof Palme and Anna Lindh, two of Sweden's greatest political leaders of modern times, who were both strongly opposed to the Zionist war agenda in the Middle East - and gave their lives fighting it.
Sweden's Prime Minister Olof Palme was assassinated on March 1, 1986.
Sweden's Foreign Minister Anna Lindh (left) was assassinated on September 11, 2003.
"The Strange Death of Anna Lindh" by Christopher Bollyn, EricHufschmid.net (Note - This article was written in Sweden by Bollyn in the days after the assassination.)
A Brave Aussie Stands Up for 9/11 Truth Against Zionist Media
Updated November 15, 2010
Anthony Lawson has made another excellent video about 9/11 truth. The video contains the comments of Kevin Bracken, a very clear-thinking and brave Australian union leader who stands up against the Zionist-controlled media and states that the official version of 9/11 simply does not stand up to scientific scrutiny. Bracken, who is polite throughout the interview, is constantly interrupted and abused by the Jewish on-air host, Jon Faine. Faine is a "climate alarmist" in the controlled media (ABC of Australia) who vigorously promotes the hoax of global warming. The fact that Faine supports the specious nonsense about man-made global warming while he viciously attacks leading members of Australia's 9-11 truth movement reveals the Zionist-controlled media's agenda behind both global deceptions.
The following interview shows how to stand up to the abuse and mind-control techniques of the Zionist media, which seeks to confuse and distract the public from the evidence that their Zionist masters were behind the terror atrocity of 9/11 - the deception that changed the world and took our nations into criminal wars of aggression -- for their profit.
The Brave Aussie Kevin Bracken vs. Jon Faine
Jon Faine is a "climate alarmist" from the Zionist-controlled media who attacks 9-11 truthseekers like Kevin Bracken.
The BBC's Bias and Israeli Crimes on the High Seas
September 12, 2010
Anthony Lawson sent me this excellent 15-minute video about the Zionist (pro-Israel) bias in the British Broadcasting Corporation's (BBC) program on the Israeli military assault on the Gaza aid flotilla last May. I highly recommend watching the video to understand how the so-called public broadcasting networks of Britain and the United States are used to convey Zionist propaganda.
The BBC is like the PBS television and NPR radio broadcasting networks in the United States wrapped into one, but the BBC is actually more global in its reach than its U.S. counterparts. The Rothschild family has a great deal of influence over the BBC, where a member of the family has often served as a governor on its board.
Lawson points out the clear editorial bias of the BBC Panorama "Death in the Med", which may not be so clear to Americans who are used to U.S. television news, which is far more blatant and biased in its coverage of Israel. One has to remember that the Israeli assault on the flotilla was completely illegal, i.e. an act of state piracy, and its boarding of the ship with armed soldiers left 9 Turkish civilians dead. One of those was also an American citizen. Pirates committing a massacre have never gotten off so lightly, but then these are Israeli pirates, after all.
The audio track of the communications with the ship presented by the Israelis was clearly falsified to include spliced-in comments about Auschwitz and 9/11. Lawson points out the inconsistency of these remarks with the behavior of the Israeli personnel seen in the footage. The Israelis clearly decided to try to vilify the people on the flotilla with the falsified audio track.
Anthony Lawson, who produced the video, included these comments:
Whatever happened on the Mavi Marmara on the morning of May 31st, 2010, the BBC's Panorama team failed to give a balanced view of it in its so-called documentary, Death in the Med. Even the title sounds more like that of a paperback mystery, rather than a serious analysis of Israel's worst atrocity since Operation Cast Lead.
Documentaries should be truthful and informative and expand our understanding of situations and events; their content should be rigorously checked for errors in statements which are presented as facts and conjecture, and the personal opinions of their writers and presenters should be explicitly identified as such. But Death in the Med failed any test based on those parameters.
The BBC's television and radio services reach an audience measured in hundreds of millions, world-wide, but are primarily funded by taxes and license fees paid by the British public; not by Israel or its influential friends. Panorama's biased and often untruthful Treatment of Israel's worst atrocity since Operation Cast Lead should trigger a public enquiry about who is really in charge of one of the most influential broadcaster's on the planet.
Hijacking 9-11 to Wage War on Islam
September 6, 2010
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.” - Adolf Hitler
“A half-truth is a whole lie.” - Yiddish saying
“Those in possession of absolute power can not only prophesy and make their prophecies come true, but they can also lie and make their lies come true.” - Eric Hoffer, American writer (1902-1983)
The Zionist false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11 was carried out to kick-start the utterly fraudulent "War on Terror", which is really a "war of terrorism" against Islamic nations and people. The wars that have been waged in the aftermath of 9-11 in Afghanistan and Iraq are really just wars of aggression to conquer and occupy nations in order to steal their valuable minerals and wealth.
Nine years later, the memory of 9-11 is being hijacked, once again, to try to convince the public that the atrocity was carried out by Muslims in the face of abundant evidence to the contrary. This is an organized propaganda effort, carried out by the real culprits of 9-11 (e.g. Rupert Murdoch and his fellow Rothschild-funded media moguls) in order to bolster support for the criminal and immensely costly wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. I have written about this sophisticated Zionist propaganda ploy in my Questions and Answers section, where it is the second question from the top.
The manufactured controversy over the proposed Islamic center near Ground Zero is being used to stir up anti-Islamic passions and Islamophobia in the West. The mass produced "Sharia" signs seen in the recent anti-mosque protest in New York City reveal that this is an organized propaganda effort, not unlike others I have seen about 9-11. I seriously doubt that the women in the photos below have any idea what "Sharia" means. The following three photos, which were taken on August 22, 2010 in Manhattan by Seth Wenig of AP, have been published on the front pages of newspapers around the world and are clearly part of the failing campaign to blame 9-11 on Muslims.
On the Cusp of the Next Ice Age
July 1, 2010
The amazing photos by James Appleton of the recent volcanic eruption on Iceland capture images of the cosmic and planetary forces that affect Earth's climate. Solar radiation, volcanic eruptions (above and below the seas) and the cycle of ice ages are among the key subjects discussed in Robert Felix's fascinating books about magnetic reversals, climate change, and evolutionary leaps.
Are we on the cusp of the next ice age? Having just read Robert W. Felix's exellent books (Not by Fire but by Ice and Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps) I recommend them to anyone who is truly interested in the scientific debate about climate change. Felix provides compelling evidence that we are indeed on the cusp of the next ice age, which will bring profound changes to the planet and every living thing on it.
We can predict the exact time that the sun will rise tomorrow and when it will set because the cycles of the Earth's rotation and its orbit around the sun are known. There are, however, much larger cycles that affect the planet in a more profound way. One of the most important, but least understood, is the 11,500 year cycle of magnetic reversals. It is very important to understand the consequences of this cycle because we are on the cusp of the next magnetic reversal.
Norway is a nation where my book, Solving 9-11, has been available online for readers for the past year. Today I received a note from the online host who wrote an article (in Norwegian) that my book is the most popular book online at Askehaug during the past six months. I certainly hope to visit Norway soon.
Here is the beginning of the article in Norwegian:
Etter seks måneder med gratis nedlastbare bøker hos Askehaug, er Christopher Bollyn den klart mest populære forfatteren. Oversettelsen av hans bok «Solving 9/11» til «9/11-koden» startet på Litteraturfestivalen på Lillehammer i mai 2009. Enda gjenstår korrekturen på noen kapitler, men takket være kollektiv innsats fra et helt team av oversettere, vil andreutgaven være klar nå før sommeren.
"We Would Publish Whole Stories That Were Lies" - Newsweek Editor
May 21, 2010
As a journalist, I enjoy reading a good newspaper. I found this amazingly candid editorial in the global edition of the New York Times, of all places. Alex Beam, the author, was a fact-checker with Newsweek magazine in the 1970s. In this piece Beam admits that Newsweek "would publish whole stories that were lies." I have decided to present the entire editorial for my readers because this is the fundamental problem with the controlled press in the United States - it lies through its teeth on matters of grave importance to the public.
The New York Times, you will recall, published a series of stories from Judith Miller that were completely false about Iraq's supposed weapons of mass destruction, which in reality did not exist. These false stories, however, were instrumental in dragging the United States into an extremely costly and disastrous war - one in which we are still engaged. It is, of course, not just Newsweek and the New York Times that are in the business of producing war propaganda and lying to the American people. The entire controlled press network of the United States tells the same lies, especially the big television networks, CNN, and FOX News. The so-called mainstream media (which is really not at all mainstream) has lied to the public for soon to be 9 years about what really happened on 9-11. The 9-11 truth is out but only thanks to independent researchers and writers on the Internet. The Zionist controlled political system and media have been the biggest obstacles to finding the truth about what happened on 9-11. The treasonous media and politicians present us with a politically charged and unstable situation, one which cannot be accepted for very long by any nation who aspires or expects to live in freedom.
When being a journalist-on-the-rise was a glass half-filled job
By Alex Beam, Boston Globe May 11, 2010
My first job in journalism was at the now-foundering Newsweek magazine, which the Washington Post Co. has put up for sale. This was — gasp — more than 30 years ago, and my memories are grossly irrelevant to anything that has happened there since, say, 1980. Having said that . . .
Newsweek in 1977 and 1978 was fat, plush, almost 100 pages long, and choked with advertising. (The current issue is 56 pages.) I’m told the magazine had its moment in the 1960s; maybe. When I arrived, it was very much Avis to Time’s Hertz — smaller, somewhat scrappier, but as firmly committed to corporate, factory journalism as our crosstown rival.
I was an editorial assistant/fact-checker, with duties analogous to those of an 18th-century cabin boy in the Royal Navy. My favorite person in the building, a shaky-handed editor named Richard Steele, assured me of a bright future, because I knew when to refresh his bottomless vodka glass as he gleefully tore into staffers’ copy every Friday night.
The entire, nutty journalism model had been lifted wholesale from Henry Luce & Co. over at Time. Correspondents sent lengthy dispatches to New York, where modestly gifted, self-hating writers boiled their work into readable squibs. Actual editors then rehashed the silage a second or third time, until it came out sounding like the Delta Airlines flight magazine. Calvin Trillin, one of several major talents to escape the newsweekly grasp — John McPhee, Geoffrey Wolff, and Maureen Dowd would be others — poked fun at the whole process in his short novel “Floater.’’
In Luce’s day, a cadre of gorgeous, brilliant women from the Seven Sisters colleges backstopped this modern-day rendering plant as fact-checkers. In the late 1970s, about half the fact-checkers were men, so in addition to pouring vodka I checked facts, a process that left me bleakly cynical about journalistic accuracy. We would publish whole stories that were lies — Francois Mitterrand’s plan to destroy the French economy was a recurring theme — but at least the names were spelled correctly. Two T’s, two R’s. I will never forget.
I worked at the international edition, where our big mission was refighting the Cold War. The fall of Saigon was only three years behind us, and glasnost was still eight years away. We printed many “exclusives’’ by a remarkably tanned, anti-communist crusader named Arnaud de Borchgrave, known as “the short count.’’ De Borchgrave would announce his masterpieces with the antiquated phrase “Three bells!’’ an allusion to the old wire-service tickers which used to chime bells touting stories of capital importance. Everyone laughed at de Borchgrave’s copy, but we printed it anyway. Those decisions were made well above my pay grade. He later became editor of the Moonie-owned Washington Times.
The weekly magazine pace was languid. In New York, nobody did any serious work before Thursday. Then we labored like dogs, usually through the night on Friday, writing, rewriting, rerewriting, then trimming and performing light editing through Saturday. Correspondent Seth Mydans once confessed to me that he had no idea how to spend the first half of his week. Like many other Newsweek reporters, he soon drifted away to The New York Times, where, it is said, a Monday-to-Friday work schedule remains in effect.
For me, Newsweek was like an upside-down journalism school, where I learned an astonishing number of bad habits, e.g., having someone else check your facts. We poached material constantly, from newspapers, from other publications — even from Time. Copying from Time was a fact-checker’s dream, because we knew they took accuracy very seriously over there. It is true that a first-year reporter at the Cape Cod Times knew 20 times as much about journalism as I did then, but what the heck: I wanted to work at Newsweek.
I did eventually land enough bylines to move to another job, but because it wasn’t at the Delta flight magazine or at a vodka concession, I had to learn the trade all over again.
Alex Beam is a Boston Globe columnist. His e-dress is firstname.lastname@example.org.
The Jewish Secret Society That Controls the U.S. Media
December 1, 2009
"Thanks to the God of Truth..."
Thanks to the God of TRUTH for giving the world a few brave truth tellers who forsake the easy, safe life to dig out the facts and risk their necks to make it available. Bollyn and others have not been harassed because they are spreading fantasy, but because they are making the enemies of freedom and truth uneasy. They know that secrecy and deception are their tools and that an informed public is their undoing.
Tuesday Radio Show on RBN I was on the Morning Liberty show with R.J. Hender on the Republic Broadcasting Network on Tuesday, December 1, from 7 - 9 a.m. (Mountain Time). The show is on the RBN website:http://republicbroadcasting.org/
Subject: Proof of a Conspiracy - The Evidence that a Secret Brotherhood Controls the U.S. Media
I discussed the key role played by the secret Jewish freemasonic "brotherhood" of B'nai B'rith in the cover-up of the truth of 9-11. This is a very old and powerful Jewish secret society, founded by 12 German Jews in New York City in 1843, which has long had immense influence in the spheres of the U.S. judicial system, government, intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and media. The B'nai B'rith is a secret organization that works to promote a foreign and un-American agenda -- Zionism. Many of its members are high-level judges. What does this say about judicial corruption by members of a secret society for Jews only?
In 1878, the B'nai B'rith was already "one of the most powerful secret organizations in the United States." It began when the Jewish population of the U.S. was very small and consisted primarily of Jews of German origin.
The B'nai B'rith - eager to swell its ranks - was instrumental in recruiting and bringing hundreds of thousands of Jews from Eastern Europe to the U.S. in the late 1800s. The illiterate and uneducated Jews from the ghettos of Lithuania, Romania, Poland, Ukraine, and Byelorussia were sent to frontier towns like Cleveland and became new members of the growing secret society. The family of the Cleveland gangster Sam Miller, father of Aaron Miller of the State Departmen, and the Chertoff family are such B'nai B'rith families. Obama's chief of staff Rahm Emanuel comes from two B'nai B'rith families of Chicago - the Auerbach and the Smulevitz clans. Michael Goff, the founding manager of Ptech, the Mossad Trojan Horse of 9-11, is the son and grandson of the leading B'nai B'rith 32nd Degree Masons of Worcester, Massachusetts. The secret society of B'nai B'rith now has immense influence in virtually every town and village across the United States and Canada. The judge, the clerk, and your lawyer are probably all members of the same secret society. That is the kind of injustice I experienced in Cook County when I was maliciously prosecuted for my 9-11 research in 2007.
The Music, Entertainment, and Media Unit of the B'nai B'rith is a special lodge, created in 1963, for members holding high-level positions in the U.S. media industry. This is the secret organization that allows the Jewish owners of media outlets to conspire and control the information provided to the American people.
Like many other Jewish media moguls, Gerald M. Levin (the head of HBO AOL Time Warner) who took over CNN from Ted Turner in the mid-1990s, is also a member of the Media Lodge of B'nai B'rith. The Zionists wanted complete control of the U.S. mass media and conspired to get CNN away from Turner's control. CNN's live coverage of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982 showed that a Gentile-owned media network of such size was a serious threat to the Zionist criminal agenda. In order to understand WHY the U.S. mass media will never address the facts and evidence of Israeli involvement in the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 it is essential to understand how this secret Zionist organization controls the U.S. media. This Jews-only secret society has a distinctly foreign agenda, something which should be of concern to all Americans.
B'nai B'rith used their agent Eddie Jacobson, a personal friend of Harry Truman's, to get the U.S. president to approve the 1947 UN Partition Plan of Palestine and the subsequent establishment of the Zionist state in 1948. Frank Goldman and Maurice Bisgyer, the two heads of B'nai B'rith who conspired with Jacobson to get Truman's support for the Zionist project, were both "zealous" Zionists, according to A.J. Granoff, a B'nai B'rith member involved in the secret meetings held off-the-record in the Oval Office.
FUCHS: Well, now, several men, such as Frank Goldman, who I believe was president at the time we're mainly interested in, of B’nai B’rith, and Maurice Bisgyer, were, it would seem to me, in my limited reading, rather pro-Zionist to quite a degree.
GRANOFF: That's right. But at first they had to sort of cover it up, but they then became openly zealous.
Bollyn Statement on the Importance of Non-Violence
A physical therapist examined my right arm last week and determined that I am still unable to extend it fully, one full year after my right elbow was fractured in an act of police brutality. I cannot straighten my arm and suffer pain in the elbow because it was broken by three armed thugs of the Hoffman Estates police department one year ago on 15 August 2006.
The three "tactical officers" who were involved in breaking my right elbow and TASERing me while I was held down and restrained are: Michael Barber, Timothy Stoy, and Darin Felgenhauer. I hold these men and their supervising officers fully accountable for the injury and suffering they have inflicted on my family.
In my frustrated attempt to obtain justice through the court for the brutal police assault that I and my family suffered, I discovered that there is a host of characters involved in supporting the extremely corrupt judicial system in Cook County (Chicago). From the judge on down, there are scores of people who support this terribly flawed system of justice that only promotes injustice. This includes the prosecuting and defense attorneys, the office of the clerk, the county sheriff and police departments within the county.
I am a non-violent person who is the victim of police brutality. I still cannot straighten my right arm. I have no idea what internal injuries I have suffered as a result of the "drive stun" of 50,000 volts that was delivered to my lower back as I was held down by two "peace officers" of the Hoffman Estates police department.
I do know that Officer Tim Stoy knelt with his full body weight on my right temple (a fact which Felgenhauer testified to in court) for about two minutes and that this non-police lethal hold could have very easily caused brain damage and death.
TORTURE BY TASER
I also know that Officer Michael Barber conspired, prepared, and delivered the "drive stun" from his TASER weapon while he and Stoy held me down with my left hand cuffed behind my back and my right arm trapped beneath my body. Because I was not resisting in any way and was fully restrained, Barber's TASERing of me can only be considered as torture with the intent to injure or kill.
I hold these men, and their superiors, fully accountable, and will do what I can to obtain justice. But would I do such a thing to them if our positions were reversed or if I had the chance for revenge? Would I inflict violence or torture on them?
No. I would not because I don't use violence. I see violence and torture as uncivilized and un-Christian.
I saw the corrupt officers who tortured me and broke my arm giving each other "high fives" when I went to court the first time. I didn't know then that the police in Chicago and Cook County always get off. Torture has been used by the police in Chicago for decades and according to a series of articles in the Chicago Reader, the police involved in such torture have never been held accountable for the lies they tell in court.
I listened how Stoy and Barber told bold-faced lies on the stand. They said they smelled alcohol on my breath from 10 feet away, for example, and that I clenched my fists and threatened the three armed and armor-clad officers. They said I then resisted their arrest, flailed my arms, and did three push-ups with two men on top of me.
Both Stoy and Barber told the court that the other guy had called out "TASER" before the TASER shock was delivered. Logic dictates that either both men are either both lying or one is lying and the other has forgotten what he did that day.
I, for that matter, know that both men are lying because I didn't hear either man on top of me say anything before I felt a square object placed against my lower back prior to the delivery of the electrocution-type shock. One was above my head and the other was on top of my back so I would have heard if either of them had said "TASER, TASER, TASER," as Barber said Stoy shouted.
Neither one of them said anything - not one damn word.
Against the protest of my attorneys, Judge Hyman Riebman allowed Barber to give false testimony about the effects of a "drive stun" TASER shock.
Barber, who is not an expert on the effects of TASER shock, told the court that such a 50,000 volt shock only affects an area of about 1 square inch and has only the power of a small Christmas light. This is utter nonsense but Riebman allowed Barber to speak as an expert on the effects of TASERing.
The police lies only continued and grew as the prosecution said that I had called 911 in order to start a fight, ignoring the fact that the tactical team had interfered with the 911 response and taken over the call from the uniformed officer who had been dispatched to my house. If a uniformed officer had responded to my non-emergency call there obviously would have been no cause for any alarm.
Is violence an answer to any of the problems that plague the police?
No. I do not support violence as a solution and never have. I am a journalist and a writer, not a provocateur. I am convinced that the violence that I suffered in August 2006 was inflicted on me because of my journalism. The evidence clearly indicates that the Hoffman Estates police conspired to use violence on me long before the three-man "tactical unit" arrived at my house. Although the actions of Barber, Stoy, and Felgenhauerare clearly reprehensible, and I and my family have suffered immensely as a result of their criminal actions, I would not wish any violence upon them.
Violence does not solve anything and only results in more pain and suffering. I say this because I am very concerned with the discussion of violence that I see on the Iamthewitness. com website. This website is run by Eric Hufschmid and an Internet radio host known as Daryl B. Smith, who lives in France.
"We may have to kill all of them."
In a recent article entitled "Battle Plan," the website uses language that implies the use of violence to "eliminate our infestation of parasites." While I certainly agree with the need to remove the sources of corruption of our financial, political, and judicial systems, I completely disagree with the notion that violence is the solution to the problem.
It is counter-productive, extremely foolish, and irresponsible for Hufschmid and Smith to say things like this on their website:
"Alex Jones and other Zionist Deniers often imply that the only way to stop "them" is with violence. We should consider the possibility that he is telling us the truth. The Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Chertoffs, and everybody else in this Zionist crime network may never give up. We may have to kill all of them."
"If violence erupts, the FBI and police may have to be our first targets."
I would hope that Eric Hufschmid would have the intelligence and common sense not to say such things. Doesn't he realize what he asking for by saying such things? Perhaps Eric should read what happened to Matt Hale. He has been imprisoned for 40 years for simply being the inspiration for a killer of a judge's family in Chicago.
This language could easily be seen as "hate speech" or inciting violence. With comments like these Hufschmid and Smith are going out on very thin ice - legally. This is nowhere I would want to go. I would strongly urge them to remove such comments and stick to the moral high ground. Such violent language marginalizes them - and their message. Don't they see that?
Hufschmid urges me to speak on his Internet radio show but I simply cannot and would not want be seen as supporting such calls for violence. I can not associate myself with people who are seen as supporting violence. It is that simple.
It is against my nature to promote violence. Furthermore, it is extremely unwise and counter-productive to do so.
Has violence solved anything in Palestine and Iraq? Has violence advanced any peace anywhere - ever? Have the Israelis achieved anything with all their killing and weapons? Has the American and British use of force in Iraq brought democracy, peace, or prosperity to that beleagured nation?
No, no, no.
Armed resistance, on the other hand, such as that of the Hezbollah in south Lebanon, is the legally and morally justified resistance to an armed invasion. The Intifadah of Palestine is fully justified as the legal resistance to the illegal occupation of Palestinian land. These resistance movements are defensive, essential, and legal and I certainly would not condemn them.
Bollyn Responds to Malicious Slander of Daryl B. Smith
Bollyn Responds to Final Message of Daryl B. Smith
A person called Daryl Bradford Smith has posted malicious slander about me on his website "The French Connection." This is more of the same slander that he began spreading after I visited him in November 2005. Smith has only seen me once and does not know very much about me, but he is clearly dedicated to defaming me. This is clearly his attempt to assassinate my character.
In his "final message" about me, Smith continues to spread the same vicious lies about me and my family. His theatrical rant of September 5 seems to be a clear reaction to my posting a photo of me with Smith taken before I left his home in rural France. Smith's outrageous lies about me and our visit are clearly meant only to defame and discredit me as a 9-11 researcher and writer. This is typical behavior of Smith who has tried to discredit other serious 9-11 researchers like Dr. Steven E. Jones.
Smith claims that he has worked with me for years and that I have been part of his team with Eric Hufschmid. This is completely false. I am an independent journalist and he and Eric have only used my work to promote their website since the fall of 2006. The French Connection is just one of many websites that have posted my articles.
I have been posting my articles on Rumor Mill News for years and have spoken on many radio shows long before Smith and Hufschmid started their website. Since the summer of 2006, they have tried to make it appear as if I have been working exclusively with them, which has never been the case.
Because Smith's recent emotional "rant" was laden with malicious lies concerning my visit to his house in November 2005, I am compelled to provide my account of that visit.
I first heard of the person known as "Daryl Bradford Smith" when I was interviewed for his radio show called "The French Connection" on the Genesis Communications Network (GCN). I don't recall when I first spoke on his show but it was certainly many months before September 2005, which is when he now says he first heard of me.
Smith started calling us at our home near Chicago in early 2005. This led to a show that he did with Helje about the sinking of Estonia when he was with GCN. For the record, he did a second show with Helje about Estonia in the spring of 2006, when we were in Provo visiting Dr. Steven E. Jones.
The GCN was founded by John Stadtmiller, who would later go on to found the Republic Broadcasting Network. How Stadtmiller and GCN found Smith in rural France, I don't know. As he said on his GCN radio show of January 3, 2006, he is "living out here in the middle of nowhere." Smith's credentials and background are both very murky.
At the request of Eric Hufschmid, I visited Smith in November 2005 after the Axis for Peace conference in Brussels where I was a panelist and speaker. My speech included the discovery of molten metal in the World Trade Center and the research being done by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University.
Smith first invited us to visit in the spring of 2005. He had repeatedly invited us to visit through my wife, Helje. He had led us to believe that he lived in a nice French country house "full of antiques." He even told her that some of the moving people had "knicked" some of his antiques. As we discovered, his house is quite a bit less grand than he had led us to expect.
When we were in Brussels for the Axis for Peace conference, Smith told me that he lived just south of Paris. When I checked the map and into taking the train, however, I found that it would cost about $400 to make the trip one-way to the nearest town to Smith's place, which would not have been at all close. With the high price and bad connections of the French rail system, and the fact that the national rail workers were going on strike, I decided not to make the trip.
I called Smith and Eric Hufschmid and told them that I would not be making the trip.
Both Hufschmid and Smith were quite unhappy to hear this and Hufschmid offered to send me money to pay for the trip. Due to the rail strike and Smith's remote location, I decided that to make the trip we would have to take a detour and try to get as close as possible using the excellent German rail system and then rent a car.
We used the "Beautiful Weekend" pass on the German rail network, which allows an entire family to travel for 24 hours for only $30. Using the "Schoenes Wochenende" pass we traveled to Switzerland. From Geneva, where we lived in a large and nicely furnished apartment, I rented an Avis car to drive west over the mountains to Smith's house.
Smith says that we came in a very large and fancy BMW-type car, but, in fact, it was only a simple Opel, the smallest car that would be suitable for our trip that Avis had available.
Bollyn checking the map by the rented Opel before leaving Smith's place on the morning after Thanksgiving
For Thanksgiving, we drove across France to the small village where Smith lived. The drive from Geneva took about 10 hours each way. We arrived in the afternoon and had Thanksgiving dinner with him and his wife.
The old farmhouse where he lived had been abandoned property and he was doing some renovation to try and make it livable. He showed me some upstairs space where he had hung some drywall. He asked me if I would be able to stick around to help him with his renovation project. This indicates that he didn't dislike me as much as he now says he did upon meeting me.
The house was very small and uncomfortable and not at all suitable for children to live in. It was a far cry from what he had led us to expect. It was quite cold and primitive and we didn't want to subject our children to such dismal conditions. We had planned to stay one night and left the next day after breakfast and a walk. We stayed in a pleasant hotel in Moulins, about half-way from Geneva, on the way to and from Smith's house. I don't recall the name of his village.
While Smith's wife, Pascal, was very pleasant and hospitable, he was rather suspicious and withdrawn. Suddenly, during the dinner, he turned to us and asked: "Why did you really come?" in a distinctly unpleasant tone. We reminded him that he was the one who had invited us.
He was not at all interested in talking with me. I had just spent weeks in Worms and Mannheim covering the trial of Ernst Zundel. He had no interest in that or any other subject that I had written about. He was quite different from the person I had expected him to be.
We brought the best wine, chocolate, and marmelade we could find for the Thanksgiving dinner. Smith, according to Eric Hufschmid, has some liver disease, something like cirrhosis of the liver, although we were not aware of this prior to our visit. For that reason, he was not able to enjoy the fine wine we had brought.
Helje at the Chocolatier in Moulins holding the bag of the finest hand-made chocolates as a gift for Smith
His charming wife, Pascal, had been a teacher of "hip-hop" street dance, she said. She was very glad to have some wine with us.
Pascal and Smith had one large and two small dogs. My daughter, who loves animals, enjoyed playing with them. We got two amazing photos of her holding one of the dogs. These photos show an incredible aura around them.
Bollyn's daughter holding one of Smith's dogs
Pascal told me that her family was in Lyon and I recall thinking that Pascal appeared to be of North African ancestry. France has millions of ethnic North Africans from its former colonies of Algeria, Tunisia, etc. She certainly enjoyed meeting us and being with our children, who have attended European schools and been home-schooled. Helje has a degree in teaching and I have worked as a teacher in the International School in Stockholm.
The Thanksgiving meal was excellent and my children distinctly recall having had second portions. My daughter still remembers enjoying "the crunchy part."
During the visit, Helje asked Daryl if he had been to Vietnam. He said that he was too young for that. A little later he asked Helje, rather inquisitively, "Who told you I was in the military?"
Helje said that he just reminded her of somebody she knew who had been in Vietnam.
Daryl exhibited an unexpected anti-German attitude. We had just come from Germany, where we had lived for two years and where our children had gone to school. When I told Smith about the German trains and the high standard of construction and living in Germany, he showed animosity toward anything German.
He insisted that everything was better in France, which we know very well is not the case. French windows, for example, are often leaky and single-pane glass. German windows, on the other hand, are state of the art and energy efficient no matter where you look.
Contrary to what he says in his latest rant, I did not stand up with wine spilling from my mouth and sing the German national anthem or raise a Nazi salute. This is absurd fiction.
This is merely meant to defame me, as are his comments that I was drunk. This is pure fiction. Defaming me as a wild drunk is exactly what Michael Piper has tried to do as did the Hoffman Estates police and the prosecution during my trial.
During the evening, Smith claimed that he had the exact same birthdate as I, but I remember that he was off by a year in age. Furthermore, he didn't make much of the amazing coincidence that we should have the exact same birthday. How odd.
In the spring of 2005, Daryl had talked to Helje about the "upcoming epidemic" of Bird Flu, and that this was the reason he had moved to rural France.
"Bird Flu will kill most of the world's population," he told her.
When we visited him, he showed us the large amounts of Tamiflu he had stocked in his house. We noticed, however, that there were free-roaming geese living in the yard. I photographed one that was not more than 20 feet from his front door.
One of the geese that roamed freely in front of Smith's house
Early in the morning, after a rather sleepless night, we went to the kitchen and had breakfast with Pascal. Smith was nowhere to be seen but came out after we had already finished eating. He appeared to be sleepy and grouchy and excused himself saying that he has "liver problems" that don't let him sleep.
After breakfast, all of us except Daryl went on a walk with Pascal to see some fields nearby with horses.
Going for the walk with Pascal, who appears to be quite happy with the Bollyn family. Daryl's house is to the right of the car by the potted plant.
It was quite damp and chilly and the children, whose feet were getting cold and who have seen plenty of horses in North Dakota, decided that they wanted to go back to the house. It had started to rain by the time they got there but Smith wouldn't let them in. When we returned from our walk with Pascal, we found the kids waiting outside by the door - shivering.
This seemed rather odd, we thought. Why would Smith refuse to let the kids in the house? Did he have some communications that he needed to make in privacy? What kind of host would lock out a 10- and a 7-year-old child and leave them out in the cold?
After our visit on Thanksgiving 2005, Smith spread malicious slander about me and my family to people he knew through the Internet. He stopped communicating altogether with us after our visit. Smith's malicious slander even found its way to the courtroom where I was on trial last spring.
Rather than discussing the real issues, such as 9-11 or the corrupt legal system that prosecuted me, Smith and Eric Hufschmid have tried to make an issue out of me. Hufschmid has known all along that my family and I were fine. There was no need to raise the alarm that we had been kidnapped or killed. This is utter fiction that only Smith and Hufschmid have promoted. Unfortunately, many people believe the alarming and slanderous lies of Smith.
Why is Smith so antagonistic towards me and those who have helped me during my trial? Why has he spread malicious slander about me since he met me in November 2005? He now says that he had extreme animosity toward me from the minute he met me. Why would I trust him with anything?
Bollyn (left) with Smith the morning after Thanksgiving before leaving for Geneva
James B. Phillips Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid & Daryl B. Smith
September 7, 2007
A Response To: Christopher Bollyn’s Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid
The following is an open letter to Eric Hufschmid and the person known as "Daryl Bradford Smith" from James B. Phillips, a friend and supporter of Christopher Bollyn.
James B. Phillips is a devout Catholic and combat veteran of the Vietnam War.
In this open letter Phillips asks Hufschmid about his increasingly bizarre behavior and that of the person with whom he works but has never met - Daryl Bradford Smith.
Hufschmid and Smith run a website called The French Connection. On this website they have been saying for several months that I have been tortured, kidnapped, killed or imprisoned, depending on what day of the week it is. Now they say I am a Zionist agent who has been tortured, or some such nonsense.
I have repeatedly warned Eric Hufschmid about Daryl Bradford Smith since I met Mr. Smith in France in November 2005. He is an extremely suspicious character, to say the least. My warnings to Eric seemed to have fallen on deaf ears. It appears to me that Mr. Smith has roped and tied Eric.
When Hufschmid, the webmaster of The French Connection, posted false rumors about me in June and July, I repeatedly told him to remove these comments - but he did not.
He told me that Daryl wanted all my articles removed from the website. I then told Eric to remove my material from the website that he no longer seemed to control - but he didn't.
I asked him if he even knows who Daryl Bradford Smith really is - but he doesn't.
Hufschmid admitted that he has no idea who Smith is in an email to me [Bollyn] on July 18, 2007:
"I don't expect you -- or anybody -- to like, or work with, Daryl. I don't even know Daryl, except as a voice on the telephone."
So, Hufschmid, who is critical of everyone in the 9-11 movement, is working for "a voice on the telephone." Does that make sense?
The French Connection has a small blurb on About Daryl Bradford Smith:
"He worked as a top chef, owned his own restaurant, and was a professor. A few years ago he moved to France with his wife."
A professor? In what, may I ask? He talks like a person who has studied torture methods.
Hufschmid, who calls for investigating everybody in the 9-11 truth movement is working closely with somebody he has never even met?
Hufschmid says: "How do we determine who to trust? How do we know which of the people who complain about Zionism are seriously interested in stopping it? All we can do is investigate everybody; no exceptions."
"It is considered acceptable to investigate political candidates -- and even insult them -- but when we investigate the people in the "9-11 truth movement", we are chastised for "dividing the movement", "creating fights", or "spreading gossip".
"Since background checks are considered acceptable for businesses, why are we not allowed to investigate people in the 9/11 movement?
"What would happen if we investigate 9/11 activists?"
I say. What would happen if we investigate Daryl Bradford Smith? What would we find in his military background? How did he wind up working with John Stadtmiller and Genesis Communications Network from the middle of France? What is his real name and what does his Curriculum Vitae look like?
I have excellent photographs of my visit to Smith's hideout in central France. I went there with my family and they all have excellent recall of what he was like and what transpired. This material and photographs will soon be appearing on:
Here is the Open Letter written by James B. Phillips:
September 6, 2007
Dear Mr. Hufschmid:
This is an "open letter" being sent to you by an individual who along with many others has been very let down in their expectations of you and the person who goes by the name of Daryl Bradford Smith.
I just got done listening to the latest "rant" of Mr. Smith in which he castigates Christopher Bollyn to the nth degree. I also read your latest take on the Bollyn case ("What happened to the Bollyn family?").
I am not addressing this letter directly to Smith because he indicated in his talk that he did not wish to entertain any further communications regarding Mr. Bollyn. Nevertheless, you are presumably free to forward this to him with your comments if you see fit. I am simply copying it to him.
Ever since Christopher and family left for parts unknown, you and Smith have harmed him all the while claiming that you were concerned for his well being. You harmed him by what you put on your site regarding what you thought was his status. This caused his income from donations to drop drastically.
In effect you were trying to get him to communicate with you on your terms (i.e., another audio file interview) by economic coercion. This is absolutely despicable and your failure to publicly come clean on this issue makes it obvious to those with a discerning eye that you are acting maliciously or are in serious denial.
It is interesting that in all the defensive self-serving posturing by you and Smith neither of you ever address the issue of how your actions have caused grave economic loss for Bollyn. Not that he would ever sue you, but it would certainly appear that your direct and substantial contribution to his economic losses by intentionally discouraging others from contributing to him, especially after he repeatedly pleaded with you to stop would constitute a viable tort action.
I have also found it interesting that in all the time you both worked with Mr. Bollyn neither of you ever helped as a friend by providing a link to his website. Many unsuspecting people thought that The French Connection was actually the "official" Christopher Bollyn website when in fact it was not at all.
For the record Chris' site is www.bollyn.com. Your obvious failure to include a link to Chris' website demonstrates a desire for control, not friendship.
I notice that you seem to want so much to tell the world where Chris is. It is rather curious that neither you nor Smith seem willing to disclose your exact locations. You gents like to speak of Christopher's brother. What, if anything, does the public know of your siblings, or even if you have any other than the Murdoch connection.
You cast aspersions quite freely; people are to be considered guilty until proven innocent. That is a rather interesting standard. Does it also apply to both of you? Have you proven your innocence? Please provide an article on same.
It is not without reason that more and more people are coming to see you and Smith as the guilty ones. Are you what a group of French heretical nuns were called: pure as angels and proud as devils?
When Bollyn refused to communicate with you on your terms you both went ballistic. Imagine two grown supposedly mature men carrying on with a major non-stop hissy fit. Did it never occur to either of you that you were behaving like this? People have come to see your actions not as a true response of friends, but rather as two individuals who were much more interested in control than friendship, faked or otherwise.
You have turned on good decent people like Jim Condit, Jr., who realizes that we live in a world populated by many gray characters and we must carry on the best we can without compromising our moral integrity. I recall an audio clip where you painted Condit with your typical broad brush as a bad guy. Bollyn, much to his credit, quickly spoke up to defend Condit.
Your actions are so often rash. In many ways you and Smith are your own worst enemies. We don't live in a world of black and white stick men. That world may have existed for us in our kindergarten days, but it should be long gone by now.
Your Pharisaical condemnation of guilt by association is just that. Is that why Smith condemned Jesus Christ to a wished for retroactive abortion?! Was it because Jesus was associated with Suzette, a gal who woke up to what Smith was all about. Well, don't take my word for it.
Smith in his rant on Suzette stated as much. His self-serving defensive rationalizing spin on his emotional outburst against Suzette by way of blaspheming the Blessed Mother of God by wishing that she had an abortion of the God/Man who as Second Divine Person of the Blessed Trinity actually created Smith was rather incredible. How many people have you known in your lifetime have blasphemed in such a way against both the Blessed Mother and her Divine Son and at the same time?!
Then, again maybe I am asking the wrong person for who exactly is Eric Hufschmid?
Eric Hufschmid is an individual who promotes the totally bogus science of evolution on his website. The article (which hopefully you won't delete or modify after this open letter to you goes out) "Science and Religion" states in part: "The process by which fertilized eggs develop into a dog, a rabbit, a pig, and a human is evidence that all creatures evolved from a hollow ball of cells that floated in the water. This creature evolved into a fish-like creature, which eventually evolved into a creature that walks on land."
It is particularly interesting that you promote evolution Mr. Hufschmid being as that the teaching of evolution has always been at the very core of atheistic communism. For evolution to stand the Christian Religion must fall. There is no middle ground. So called "Theistic Evolution" is a bogus modernist oxymoron which any properly educated Christian fully realizes.
Seeing as Mr. Hufschmid apparently believes in evolution it should not be so surprising to see him drop other gems like this on his website: "If there is a God, and if he cared what we think about him, wouldn't he tell all humans what to think? Why would he leave us in a state of ignorance and confusion?
The most sensible explanation to this mystery is that if there is a god, he doesn't care what we think about him." What type of person is this Mr. Hufschmid who reveals a great mystery to us by offering the alternative of atheism or of a God who could care less what we think about Him? These are just two of the "delights" for public consumption from Mr. Hufschmid's website. Mr. Hufschmid, honestly, do you actually believe this stuff? I would expect this kind of stuff to emanate from the mind of a "good" Talmudist.
At least two of the articles on Smith's website which presumably you placed there contain lewd pornographic type images. These types of images work to corrupt the minds, hearts, and souls of men. Freemasons and Zionists in particular want to corrupt Man's morals. Sexual imagery is one of their strongest and most successful ways of doing it. Why do you persist in helping them at their work?
Both you and Smith display a contemptuous attitude for organized religion. You appear to never say anything positive about Jesus Christ and the Christian Religion. Smith sent me a most vile email when I questioned his praising of a deceased French priest who got all kinds of positive press eulogies. Of course, the media loved him for his heretical ideas including the approval of homosexual behavior.
Smith in his rant today in referring to Christopher Bollyn said, "We had a snake amongst our midst and we didn't even know it." He also said, "I do not wish Christopher Bollyn well." This latter statement is of particular note. In the Lord's prayer we recite:
"...forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us."
True love for a Christian consists in desiring that all people, regardless of whether they are our best friends or our worst enemies, gain heaven. I would ask Mr. Smith if he desires that Christopher Bollyn go to hell or that he one day goes to heaven. His statement about not wishing Mr. Bollyn well is very troubling, but unfortunately not surprising.
I am not implying in any way that Mr. Bollyn has trespassed against Mr. Smith in any way, but even if he had, the contempt that Smith shows in his words is certainly not in any sense Christian, not that I am trying to say that Smith makes any claim to being a Christian. Nevertheless, it would be reasonable to ask if Smith does not wish Bollyn well does he wish him evil.
What say ye, Mr. Smith? Is it the same as what a Talmudic Zionist would wish for Mr. Bollyn?
James B. Phillips
Photo: Christopher Bollyn (on left) with the person known as "Daryl Bradford Smith" at his hideout in central France. This photo was taken the morning after Thanksgiving 2005 when Bollyn and his family visited Smith, at his request. Bollyn was not inclined to visit Smith but at his request and with funding provided by Eric Hufschmid, the Bollyn family travelled across France to a remote village to visit Smith.
Immediately after the visit, Smith, who was then working for Genesis Communications Network and John Stadtmiller, began spreading vicious and malicious rumors about Bollyn and his family. Smith said that Bollyn was drunk and shouting "Heil Hitler" and singing the German anthem, etc.
He has recently repeated these lies and added to them on his "rant" posted on The French Connection. I will address this rant and set the record straight in the coming days on www.bollyn.com.
"Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can" - Daryl B. Smith
December 9, 2007
Understanding the Purpose and Methods of Defamation
Daryl Bradford Smith Reveals Himself as an Agent and Threatens to Kill Eric Hufschmid
By Christopher Bollyn
Daryl Bradford Smith of The French Connection has certainly never been an associate or friend of mine. I met him only once, at Thanksgiving 2005, when we visited him, at his request, at his house in rural central France. Smith raised our suspicions right away. We were both uncomfortable being around him, Helje could not sleep a wink in his very dismal house, and we left as soon as possible.
Daryl Bradford Smith, the agent, a.k.a. Daryl B. Setters
Daryl B. Setters has a string of narcotics violations involving possession of needles and syringes in Rhode Island, including a felony conviction. After more than a decade, Setters' (a.k.a. Smith) court charges were paid off by an unknown party on January 7, 2005 - exactly the month he became engaged in the 9-11 discussion as a radio host. Who paid off Smith's court costs and fines? Who does he really work for?
He had repeatedly invited us and was quite adamant that we come, although it was not at all convenient. I had been at the Axis for Peace conference in Brussels, and Daryl and Eric Hufschmid wanted me to visit Smith in central France. I decided that it was too expensive and told them that the connections were non-existent. Hufschmid then wired me the funds to make the trip because he was also very adamant that I meet Smith.
The French trains were going on strike and the only possible way to get to the village in rural France where Smith lives was to drive. We traveled south across Germany and Switzerland and I rented a car in Geneva in order to drive west across the mountains and through Moulins to get to his remote rural location.
After meeting Smith, I repeatedly warned Hufschmid that this person clearly could not be trusted. It was obvious. Shortly after that Thanksgiving 2005 visit, Smith was already spreading malicious slander about me to somebody in Canada. It was very clear that Smith had an agenda from the beginning -- to defame me and attack my credibility. I had no idea who he was working for, but he definitely was not a truth seeker and was clearly working against me.
During the summer of 2007, Smith completely revealed himself as an agent and articulated that his mission was to defame me and destroy my credibility in any way he could. After he went on his vicious attack, he tried to get Eric Hufschmid to support him and join the defamation campaign against me. Hufschmid resisted.
Eric recorded several of the phone calls in which Smith demanded that Hufschmid attack me. Smith made several clear threats on the life of Hufschmid and was evidently unaware that he was being recorded.
Hufschmid has written about this and posted links to Smith's criminal record – and the mysterious pay off that was made to clear Smith's record in January 2005:
See: "Why don't I work with Smith any longer?" Eric Hufschmid, 21 Oct 2007
Note of Warning: The complete transcripts have been posted on a website of unknown authorship called "Take Our World Back." The entire recorded conversations have been transcribed, but this website is clearly a broker of defamation, much of it coming from Michael Collins Piper -- which I will deal with shortly. Be forewarned that this is not a known source and that Daryl B. Smith uses extremely foul and violent language a great deal.
With this warning given, the online transcripts can be read at:
By reading these transcripts the public can get an idea of how orders are given to these lower-level disinformation agents and how they are given. Their orders are usually forcefully given and are accompanied by threats of extreme violence.
I am now aware of three of these agents, and all three are drug addicts or have histories of hard drug abuse, and we are not talking about smoking marijuana. It appears that the agencies use these people and exploit their weaknesses to force them to comply.
Smith reveals in these calls to Hufschmid that he has a criminal record and that he is ready to kill Eric if he does not do as he is told. Such threats certainly leave an impression. Hufschmid had undoubtedly been affected by such repeated threats against his life.
What have I done to deserve such defamation? Smith's attack against me gives the public some idea what kind of directives have been given from the top on how to defame and discredit me. There is a method to this madness, and Smith reveals some of these methods: attack my child, say that I am a lunatic and a child abuser, etc.
I am posting this very unpleasant material because, in the coming days and weeks, I will be addressing the defamation campaign and exposing the people behind the vicious defamation I have been subjected to. Defamation reveals more about those who are behind it than it does about the person being defamed, in this case me.
The following are a few excerpts from the transcripts. DBS is Daryl Smith, a.k.a. Daryl Setters; EH is Eric Hufschmid. I have cleaned up the language, which is spelled out in the complete transcript:
"SLAM BOLLYN EVERY WAY YOU CAN"
DBS: Well, here's a deal. And this is between you and me, because we've been doing this a long time together. You have to come out and, and slam Bollyn every way you can, in my, in support of me. Every way you can. No compromise. If you don't, I want parting from our, from our relationship.
EH: But what do you mean, slam him?
DBS: I, whatever the f--k you need to do to make this son-of-a--- be crippled by the s--t he's doing. I'm talking about a full court press on this guy. I'm talking about whatever it is you know about him, whatever it is you can say about him, whatever it is you can do about him, you need to do now. And if you can't do that, Eric, we gotta go. I gotta go.
"YOU START TELLING THE WORLD…"
EH: But wait a minute...
DBS: No wait a minute. I'm telling you. It's not a wait a minute. There's no wait a minute. I'm not waiting for you to answer, you, you son-of-a----. Listen to me. This is a one-way conversation. One way. I don't wanna hear what you got to say. You fight for me, or get the f--k outta my life.
EH: Well how do I fight for you? I don't understand.
DBS: You start telling the world that this guy's got a sick f--k--g kid, that he stayed in your house as a weirdo, that this prick was all f---d up, that I called you and said what I said. Start supporting me. I'm getting f---g hammered out there.
EH: Where? I don't even....snip….
"SAY HIS SON IS SICK...HE'S A WEIRDO"
EH: But how do I respond? What has he done? He only just put a picture up.
DBS: He's lied about every g-d d--n thing. This f--king guy, I want you to come out and say his son's sick. You were in your house. He's a weirdo.
EH: I can't...
DBS: Like Bollyn is mentally f--king ill.
EH: What? What am I...?
DBS: G-d d--n it, Smith is right, f--king Eric. That's what I want, f--ker. Wake up, wake the f--k up. It's me here, and if you f--k me, I know where you live, you prick. You understand me?
"THIS IS FULL-SCALE WAR"
DBS: Yeah, I'm not yelling, you dude. You are, you have to hear this. So just listen, please.
DBS: Unless and until we can get this straightened out, Eric, this battle is not bullshit here. We got a f--king war going on, and I need either your full support, or none. And either you're gonna do what we need to get done here, or you need to relinquish what, what control you have of the website. And that's the bottom line. The fight is here, this is it. And Bollyn has been f--king me, and there's more than that going on right now. The simple truth of the matter is that this is full-scale war, and unless and until we do more about it, we're lost. Now, you can, you can say that you, you know, you didn't or you couldn't or what, doesn't matter. The fact is, let's put your prognostications on the side, and say what we need to do. The fact is, we're not doing shit about anything, and nobody's supporting me, and nobody's fighting for me, and you haven't put a single article up in my support, and I need that. You haven't put a single document up, you haven't said that Bollyn's kid was a f--king lunatic. This, look, I didn't go as far as saying that in my house, Bollyn's kid was hearing voices, and there were ghosts he thought that were in my room and that they were talking to him. I didn't say that because I have some comportment about children. But this man, doesn't give a f--k about kids so much, that he will drag that f--king kid from hotel room to hotel room, and tell him the ghosts are in his head, and not get him help. And you better not do anything to support him. Not a f--king word. D'you understand me, Eric?
EH: Well yeah...
DBS: Understand what I'm coming from?
EH: Yeah, but I don't know about the kids and the ghosts, I...
DBS: I'm telling you, this kid is f--ked up, and I'm...
EH: Yeah but, but let's say I say something. How does that help you if I say that his kid has problems? I don't understand, how does it...?
DBS: It's a hundred percent support for your partner, dude.
EH: But to say something about his kid, I, I never saw...
DBS: No. It doesn't matter about the kid. That's one element. There's a million elements in there. How 'bout the size of the car? How 'bout the fact that, that, that...
EH: But I never saw the car, I cannot, what am I supposed to say...?
DBS: It's in the picture, Eric.
EH: But what do I say, what do I say, you want me to say something?
DBS: Yes. That the car was bizarre because he, see he's coming out on his website, saying that it's a small car, but the fact is it's a full size car in France.
EH: Alright, shall I say that, now...?
DBS: Yeah, d'you want me to baby-sit you through this or what?
EH: But, but, you're see, but I mean like, to me, I don't, you're saying that you want me to say this?
DBS: I don't want you ever to speak to that c--ks--ker again.
EH: He doesn't, hasn't called for, oh, months...
DBS: Yeah, but you know what, Eric...?
EH: How do you know that...?
DBS: That you got emails the other day, you got emails yesterday.
EH: That's right, I sent him an email to see if he'd respond, and he did respond.
DBS: Yeah, well here's a response: 'F--k you, you c--ks--king lying son-of-a-b--ch motherf--ker.' And how about a response to this guy Phillips' bullshit?
"CHECK MY F--KING CRIMINAL RECORD. I'LL GRAB YOU BY THE NECK."
DBS: You don't say that. I'm 'just some voice on the phone', Eric.
EH: Well, yeah, but if you tell me what not to say, well...
DBS: Don't say that, ya dope. And anything like that. Because you're not that stupid. That's a f--king slander, man.
EH: You're on your own show.
DBS: That is a slander.
EH: It is not.
DBS: I'm 'just some voice on the goddamn phone'. You say something like that again man, and I'm gonna tell you something. I will fly to America, and I'll show up at your front door.
EH: Oh, come on.
DBS: You won't f--king like it. I'll shake you around like a rag doll. [Eric laughs.] You don't even know me man. You know something? Check my f--king criminal record. I'll grab you by the neck, Eric. You f--k me like this again and you're in trouble with me. You understand me?
EH: That isn't hurting you....
DBS: This isn't a threat. This is a promise to you, ya prick.
EH: I said it, I said it to Bollyn. Who heard it?
"I am your worst f--king nightmare"
DBS: And I'm telling ya something else man.
DBS: You f--k me, I will show up at your front door and I am your worst f--king nightmare. Don't you f--k me.
"I'M TALKING ABOUT DECAPITATING YOU"
DBS: Eric, don't start that shit. You're my partner you f--king moron. You ever pull something like this again, I swear to God...
EH: You said you don't even...
DBS: ...I swear to my father, on my father's soul, I will show up at your door and I will wring your f--king neck.
EH: On your...
DBS: And I'm talking about, I'm talking about decapitating you, ya prick.
EH: On your own show, though...
"I WILL KILL YOU"
DBS: Yeah, you don't, you f--king don't. You've left me hanging out here, and you're telling Bollyn shit.
DBS: I will f--k you up man, and him.
EH: You're fighting with him 'cos you want to, I'm not...
DBS: Look Eric, I don't give a f--k about prison. You have to understand something you little bastard, I don't give a f--k about f--king blowing your brains out. And you better get your head outta your ass, and I know where the f--k you are. And you'd better pull your f--king head outta your ass, because if you piss me off I will show up at your front door and kill your f--king ass. You understand me? This ain't a f--king threat, this is a promise to you, ya prick. 'Cos I'll spend the rest of my life in jail, I got no problem with that. You f--k me like this again, I will kill you. D'you understand me. And I'm telling you that straight to your f--king head. Send those codes to my f--king in box, and get the f--k off my back. D'you understand?
EH: All right. Sure.
Daryl was ordering Eric to do what he, in turn, had been told to do, i.e. to "slam Bollyn every way you can." Smith clearly spells it out what Eric had to do: "You start telling the world that this guy's got a sick f--k--g kid, that he stayed in your house as a weirdo, that this prick was all f---d up…"
This is exactly what Smith tried to do when he aired his vicious and slanderous rant about my visit to his house on Thanksgiving 2005. I responded to Smith's slander in an article entitled Bollyn Responds to Final Message of Daryl B. Smith on September 7, 2007. I will be addressing a similar defamation rant originating from Michael Collins Piper of American Free Press, a.k.a. Michael Bernard Piper, in the coming days.
Portraits of the Fallen Note
January 26, 2010
This is a note to let my readers know that I am certainly not in Chicago or the United States as some rumors suggest. I have not been held or kidnapped by anyone at anytime nor have I flown anywhere since June 2007. They have taken all the fun out of flying so I prefer to travel by train and ship (and bicycle whenever possible).
I am planning to organize my website to make it more user friendly and hope to get my book (currently available only online), Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, published this year. I also hope I can arrange an event in the near future about "Understanding and Surviving the War on Terror," which could be done on video for viewing as a podcast. It would be a great way to respond to some questions from readers and callers.
A reader from India, for example, wrote to me about my recent comments about having met then U.S. Representative Leon E. Panetta when he was a congressman from the Monterey Bay area. I met Mr. Panetta briefly when he participated in events at the University of California at Santa Cruz about the Middle East. I was studying history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the time and engaged him in the political questions surrounding this problem. The fact that I have met Mr. Panetta does not mean that I support him or his politics.
Leon E. Panetta was appointed Director of the C.I.A. by Barack Obama. The C.I.A. has killed hundreds of civilians in Pakistan and Afghanistan using un-manned drones firing Hellfire missiles. This makes Panetta complicit in acts of terrorism.
Leon Panetta is the current director of the C.I.A. and was Bill Clinton's chief of staff. I am of the opinion that C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan and Afghanistan using Hellfire missiles launched from un-manned drones are, in fact, state-sponsored terrorism. Bombing civilians in a nation that the U.S. is not at war with is terrorism. Panetta, as the director of the C.I.A., is directly responsible for this state-sponsored terrorism, which would make him a terrorist.
Finally, I highly recommend viewing the short video piece, an audio slideshow, made by the BBC entitled "Portraits of the fallen". This very short slideshow gives the viewer a very personal view of the tragic loss of life suffered by American, Canadian, and British families who have lost loved ones in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Every soldier who is killed or wounded in these horrendous wars has a family that is devastated by their loss. This remarkable slideshow can be viewed here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/8471873.stm
Webster Tarpley's Disinfo
January 20, 2010
A reader sent me a link to a YouTube video of Webster Tarpley being interviewed on Russia Today (RT) television on December 29 about the false-flag "attempted terror" attack that occurred on Christmas Day on Delta's Northwest Airlines Flight 253 from Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport to Detroit. The video is interesting because it shows how Tarpley lies to protect Israel and the Mossad by putting the blame for the attempted bombing on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which is currently headed by Leon E. Panetta, a man I have met on several occasions when he was my Congressman for the Monterey Bay area of California.
Webster Tarpley spews his usual disinformation when he says that Al Qaida in Yemen is "a creation wholly of the U.S. intelligence agencies." Who exactly is Tarpley protecting with these lies and who is he really serving?
I happen to know something about Webster Tarpley, having been part of the same four-man panel during Jimmy Walter's 9-11 Truth Tour in Europe in the summer of 2005. During the tour Tarpley put the blame for 9-11 on a nebulous group that he never actually identified but one would infer was tied to NATO and the CIA. Tarpley, like all the other panelists on the tour, never mentioned any Israeli or Zionist role in 9-11. My speech, on the other hand, focused on the real evidence that 9-11 was an Israeli false-flag terror atrocity designed to start the "War on Terror" and change the face of America. Finally, in Rome, in the presence of journalist Maurizio Blondet and others, I asked Mr. Tarpley why he insisted on blaming nebulous U.S. entities, without providing any evidence, while avoiding the real evidence of Israeli/Mossad involvement in the terror attacks of 9-11?
Tarpley blames the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 on U.S. intelligence, as can be seen from the cover of his book. He carefully avoids the abundant evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 and the "War on Terror", which is a Zionist-designed conflict pushed by the current Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu since the mid-1980s.
In the RT video about Al Qaida in Yemen, Mr. Tarpley provides the same faulty logic and avoids any mention of Israeli intelligence, which has carried out large-scale operations in Yemen since 1949.
Here are the relevant quotes from Tarpley on RT television:
"Al Qaida, of course, is functioning, as always, as the CIA Arab-Islamic legion." (Note the use of affirmative phrases to bolster his lie.)
"Al Qaida in the Arab Peninsula is a creation wholly of the U.S. intelligence agencies."
[The Christmas bomber Abdul Mutallab] is a "protected patsy", according to Tarpley, "an asset controlled by U.S. intelligence."
Webster Tarpley and his wife, the former Leah J. Peltier, live in the Washington, D.C. area. Leah is 17 years younger than Webster and reportedly a high school drop-out who only obtained a college degree in 2009. She has been with Tarpley since his days with the Lyndon LaRouche movement in the early 1990s. Her lack of real estate expertise or education notwithstanding, Leah is the Executive Vice President of Operations at the Washington D.C. office for the privately-owned Cresa Partners LLC, where she has worked only since 2007.
Leah Tarpley works under Gene S. Sachs, a "managing principal" and member of the board of directors of the Boston-based company. Leah is not the only Tarpley working for Mr. Sachs. Chloe Tarpley is also listed as an administrator in his firm. Chloe, who has only worked for Cresa Partners since May of 2008, is Webster Tarpley's daughter. Her biological father is Joseph Peltier, who said that her mother was a high school drop-out who got involved with Tarpley through the Larouche movement.
Chloe Peltier (Tarpley) (Source: Facebook)
It is interesting to note that the Tarpley women work for the preferred agent of one of the world's largest defense contractors. Mr. Sachs' biggest client is BAE Systems North America. Sachs has completed more than 275 assignments for BAE in twenty states of the United States in the past five years. BAE Systems is the world's third largest defense contractor and Britain's leading aerospace/defense company.
In the company's own words:
BAE Systems Inc. is the U.S. subsidiary of BAE Systems plc, an international company engaged in the development, delivery and support of advanced defense and aerospace systems in the air, on land, at sea and in space. Headquartered in Rockville, Maryland, BAE Systems, Inc. employs some 45,000 employees in the US, UK, Sweden, Israel and South Africa generating annual sales in excess of $10 billion. BAE Systems Inc. consists of three operating groups that provide support and service solutions for current and future defense, intelligence, and civilian systems; design, develop and manufacture a wide range of electronic systems and subsystems for both military and commercial applications; and design, develop, produce, and provide service support of armored combat vehicles, artillery systems and intelligent munitions.
BAE's "Typhoon" is just one of the many war-fighting systems made by the British weapons giant.
Sachs has been the preferred real estate provider for BAE Systems NA since 2000 and manages some 18.5 million square feet of property for the sprawling British defense contractor. He is also the Treasurer of CresaPartners in Washington, according to Hoover's, so with two members of the Tarpley family working in his office, we can see that Mr. Sachs has a significant influence over the income flow for the Tarpley household.
Leah Tarpley works for Gene S. Sachs at the Washington office of CresaPartners LLC.
Gene S. Sachs, Managing Principal of CresaPartners LLC and preferred agent for the British defense giant BAE Systems, is Mrs. Tarpley's boss and paymaster.
If Mr. Tarpley has any solid evidence that Al Qaida in Yemen is, in fact, "a creation wholly of U.S. intelligence agencies" he should bring this information to the attention of the U.S. government and Leon E. Panetta, the Director of the CIA. Mr. Tarpley should explain who controls Al Qaida in Yemen, which he says is "functioning, as always, as the CIA Arab-Islamic legion." Pray tell Mr. Tarpley, which part of the CIA is running Al Qaida in Yemen? Is it under the direction of Mr. Panetta or is it a rogue outfit of the agency?
Mr. Tarpley should be asked if the CIA was running Al Qaida in Yemen when the USS Cole was bombed in 2000, an attack that killed 17 sailors and wounded 39 others. Perhaps Mr. Tarpley can explain the logic of why the CIA would attack a U.S. Navy ship in Yemen.
The bombed USS Cole looked very much like the USS Liberty after Israel bombed it in 1967. If "Al Qaida" in Yemen is really "controlled by U.S. intelligence," as Webster Tarpley says, he should explain why they would bomb their own ship. He should present his evidence to the U.S. government and Director of the CIA, if he has any.
Tarpley mentions that the Christmas bomber Abdul Mutallab flew through Amsterdam but he doesn't mention the conspicuous fact that security for both Schiphol Airport and Delta Airlines is provided by the Mossad-run company, International Consultants on Targeted Security -- the same company that provided passenger screening services at the crucial airports on 9-11.
So who is Webster Tarpley really serving with his disinformation?
Christopher Bollyn with Italian 9-11 journalist Maurizio Blondet at the Excelsior Hotel in Rome in June 2005 after asking Webster Tarpley why he avoided any discussion of Israeli involvement in 9-11.
The Big Lie and Paradigms of Deceit
January 6, 2010
The following essay, entitled "The Paradigms of Deceit," is written by a Danish friend and supporter named Kaj Krinsmøe. It is an excellent explanation of the well known propaganda tactic used to shape public opinion, described and employed by Adolf Hitler as "The Great Lie" or "Colossal Untruth" -- and how the Great Lie is currently being used by our corrupt political leaders and the Zionist-controlled media on the people of North America and Europe. The "colossal untruths" of our time are the government and media lies about the events of 9-11, Islamic terrorism and Afghanistan, global warming, and the Iranian nuclear threat. The Zionist deception known as the "War on Terror" is a complete fraud -- and an extremely expensive one at that.
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it” - Adolf Hitler
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” - Joseph Goebbels
HITLER ON "THE BIG LIE"
All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes. From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, where as in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. Schopenhauer called the Jew "The Great Master of Lies". Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.
The well known houses of Jewish finance were behind the promotion of Communism, Socialism, and the ensuing international political collusion. Today, this collusion has played out its role. It is defunct and the effects of international usury are becoming more and more visible to people whose awareness has emerged from the chaos of the Western mass media’s “cognitive dissonance”.
It is against this background that Prince Charles’ mission against "global warming" must be seen. "The Green Prince" is a front for the usurers in the “City of London", whose usurious credit regime is traditionally called The Great Red Dragon. Prince Charles’ Green scam is a front for international usury and for their newly devised “Carbon Trading” scheme, which could possibly be more lucrative for the Shylocks in the City than usury has been. And this devious collusion is also hijacking sane organic farming to serve its deceptive purpose.
Prince Charles, wearing "the Royal Yarmulka," attends the opening of the Jewish Community Centre on April 29, 2008 in Krakow, Poland.
Thousands of Americans have begun to realize that it is the predatory usury of Wall Street in recent years that has caused the recession of their economic circumstances. Usurious credit, not capitalism, is the evil that has subverted their nation.
The confusion about the so-called "global warming" issue is an example of how the mass media cultivates the paradigms on which it thrives and through which it channels and stereotypes the debate. Indeed, the mass media cultivates the illusions that support collusion. After all, there is no evidence that global warming is actually caused by carbon emissions. On the contrary, there is scientific evidence that it is cosmic radiation that is influencing the sun’s magnetism, which is the cause of the warming period we now experience. The usurers in the City have sent Prince Charles on an international mission much the same as when they sent Karl Marx on his anti-capital mission, behind which usury flourished luxuriously.
Another example of the phenomenal confusion disseminated by the Western mass media is the issue of Iran’s development of atomic power. Without any evidence Iran is accused of wanting to develop atomic weapons! But what is the real issue?
"We are also mindful of the fact that the nuclear weapons in Iran and the nuclearization of that whole region is a threat to that country, all countries in the region, and the world. And we have to address that. We can't let that lie." David Axelrod, President Obama's Senior Political Advisor, using the "great lie" on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos," June 28, 2009
The facts are that Iran is rich in resources. It has large deposits of uranium, oil, and natural gas. Compared to this, what does Israel have? Nothing. In fact, Israel does not even have enough water without stealing water from its neighbors.
The entire scam is to frustrate Iran from developing atomic power. To do this it needs to develop the cycle of refining uranium to a few degrees purity to power its reactors. When a country has more than a few atomic power stations it is uneconomical to buy refined uranium, especially when it has a lot of it in the ground. With atomic power Iran could sell more oil and natural gas to buy industrial technology and raise the living standard of its people. But where in the Western so-called free press can you read analysis of this simple issue?
The hectic international debate is transacted on the basis of lying paradigms. Political leaders in China and Russia could possibly try to correct this, but they don’t! This is because they know that the Western Illuminati media have the ears of the deluded majority. These mass media call the shots as to what is to be believed and not to be believed.
The day before the election in Iran, on June 12, 2009, the New York Times published that Mir Hussein Moussavi would win with 54 percent of the vote. Where did they get this information from? From a Twitter opinion poll. Who in Iran has access to Twitter? Only a handful of youths in Northern Tehran, the wealthy quarter of the Iranian capital. Most of the media whores in the West have not disputed this extreme falsehood. Even well informed commentators “trade” on this false parameter. Indeed, the Western media is characterized by whoredom, and here is a blatant example of it. Maybe Moussavi was hijacked by the Western media. But he continues to play on this lying myth, that the “election was stolen," and a lot of gullible young Iranians believe it.
If Israel attacks Iran it will set Iran’s atomic project back somewhat. But Iran will amply survive it. But for the Golems who are running the Zionist state of Israel the international repercussions will be crippling. It will release a pent-up resentment against the Zionist state that may be fatal for the Zionist regime, but not necessarily for the State of Israel.
It is improbable that such a scenario is not well understood in Washington, Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran. Indeed, this would rid the international community of a very troublesome player.
The disproportionate influence in Washington of the Jewish Zionists is not popular. In fact, it is as over-stretched as U.S. imperialism in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Prince Charles, wearing his yarmulke, and his wife Camilla light the menorah as they celebrate Hanukah, the Jewish festival of light, at Hendon Hall on December 12, 2007 in London, England.
The Copenhagen "global warming" summit ended with local temps between -6 to -9 C (21-14 F) with a frigid wind coming from Sweden where temperatures were even colder, between -10 to -25 C (14 to -13 F)
GLOBALIST SUMMIT ENDS IN CHAOS AND COLD (I hope they remembered their long underwear)
Danish police dealt severely with protesters...
as Al Gore, looking rather ill, desperately pushed the globalist agenda.
Manipulated climate data and a wise call for a U.S. boycott -
"Climate-gate," as the e-mails and other documents from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia have become known, exposes a highly politicized scientific circle -- the same circle whose work underlies efforts at the Copenhagen climate change conference. The agenda-driven policies being pushed in Copenhagen won't change the weather, but they would change our economy for the worse...
The last thing America needs is misguided legislation that will raise taxes and cost jobs - particularly when the push for such legislation rests on agenda-driven science. Without trustworthy science and with so much at stake, Americans should be wary about what comes out of this politicized conference. The president should boycott Copenhagen. - Sarah Palin, "Copenhagen's political science", December 9, 2009
Are Maurice Strong, Al Gore, and the globalists trying to hijack public policy?
"Global Warming: It is a hoax. It is bad science. It is hijacking public policy. It is the greatest scam in history." - John Coleman, meteorologist and founder of the Weather Channel
How can Deutsche Bank's asset manager know that global warming will cause the extinction of the human race? Is he also a scientist?
“People often ask about the costs. But the figures people tend to cite don’t take into account conservation and efficiency measures that are easily available. And they don’t look at the cost of inaction, which is the extinction of the human race. Period.” - Kevin Parker, Global Head of Deutsche Bank Asset Management
The effects of a repricing of carbon will be profound. Carbon will take its place alongside oil, coal and gas as one of the most closely followed commodities in the world. This will mark the beginning of externalities at last being priced into the cost of production. It will signal that carbon emitters have had a free ride for long enough. Governments, the United States in particular, will have to join Europe to create a global market for pricing carbon and businesses around the world will have to accept the price the market sets. - Kevin Parker, "Carbon emitters’ free ride is about to end," July 16, 2008
Question of the Day: Are "Chemtrails" Meant to Raise Local Temps to Bolster the Global Warming Agenda? That certainly seems to be the case.
As global warming fanatics converged in Copenhagen to try to push through their globalist agenda, the population of the western United States braced for record-low temperatures and extreme snow conditions. The extreme cold in the West brought most unusual snow to low elevations around the San Francisco Bay area. The early arrival of winter resulted in record low temperatures on December 5, with 200 record low temperatures set in 17 states across the United States. Cold weather is expected in Copenhagen on Friday. They will be hoping for global warming when Obama gets there.
Snow covered the hills around San Francisco and Los Angeles...
...as Hollywood saw snow on December 8...
...and the deer enjoyed the snow in the hills of San Jose.
Californians shivered in Redding where record low temperatures dipped to 16 degrees F (-8 C) on December 9. The Sacramento Valley saw bitter cold on December 8 with only 19 degrees F (-7 C) in Red Bluff and 23 degrees F (-5 C) in Sacramento. The same cold front brought 20 inches of snow to Flagstaff, Arizona, more than four times the record of 5 inches set in 1956.
Is "global warming" a real problem or a scam? Profesional meteorologists like John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, will tell you it is nothing but a huge scam to set up a global carbon tax. The controlled media, on the other hand, crank out a never-ending stream of articles warning of global catastrophe caused by man's use of fossil fuels. I stopped reading the Guardian Weekly (UK) because it had become nothing more than a propaganda sheet for the "global warming" crowd.
This is the key point about the controlled media and the "global warming" scare. The same controlled media outlets that are promoting this doomsday hoax are the same ones who have lied to the public for more than eight years about what really happened on 9-11 - and why the U.S. invaded Afghanistan. These are the same people running the same propaganda networks and newspapers, e.g. The New York Times, who published blatantly false stories about Iraq's supposed weapons of mass destruction in order to get U.S. public opinion to support their pre-planned illegal invasion and occupation. These people have a proven record of using deceit and lies to push a criminal agenda.
TIME'S MAN OF THE YEAR: MEGA-SHYSTER BEN BERNANKE
We now read that Ben Shalom Bernanke is man of the year for TIME magazine, a key outlet of the Zionist-controlled press in the United States. TIME has a slide show of Ben Bernanke growing up in Dillon, South Carolina. One picture shows a young Ben and says he waited tables at Alan Heller Schafer's sprawling roadside gambling and drinking establishment on Interstate 95 called "South of the Border." What TIME won't tell you is that Schafer, Bernanke's boss for many years, was the long-standing chairman of the Democratic Party in Dillon County who ran the "state's smoothest-running political machine" - by buying votes - since 1966. It certainly was not "working class values" that Bernanke learned from his local Jewish crime boss. To find out more about Bernanke's ties to the Jewish crime boss of South Carolina, I recommend my article, "The Fleecing of America: 9-11 and the Crisis on Wall Street."
Ben Bernanke worked for Alan Schafer for years. TIME magazine says that Bernanke spent summers waiting tables at the South of the Border tourist trap, experiences that helped him appreciate working class values. What it doesn't tell you is that the man he worked for and who taught him those "working class values" was the crime boss of Dillon, South Carolina.
TIME magazine doesn't tell you that Alan Schafer, Ben's mentor and boss, went to prison for stealing elections.
The man who chose Bernanke to be man of the year, and who kept the serious crimes of Alan Schafer out of the story, is the managing editor of TIME magazine, Richard Stengel.
Richard Stengel, Managing Editor of TIME
Stengel also happens to be a close friend of the former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank, Alan Greenspan, and his journalist wife Andrea Mitchell. Here Stengel and Mitchell pose during TIME's cocktail party on May 8, 2009 in Washington, DC.
What a small world it is at the top. Everybody seems to know everyone else.
The Amazing Story Behind the Global Warming Scam
By John Coleman February 11, 2009
The key players are now all in place in Washington and in state governments across America to officially label carbon dioxide as a pollutant and enact laws that tax us citizens for our carbon footprints. Only two details stand in the way: the faltering economic times and a dramatic turn toward a colder climate. The last two bitter winters have led to a rise in public awareness that there is no runaway global warming. A majority of American citizens are now becoming skeptical of the claim that our carbon footprints, resulting from our use of fossil fuels, are going to lead to climatic calamities. But governments are not yet listening to the citizens.
How did we ever get to this point where bad science is driving big government to punish the citizens for living the good life that fossil fuels provide for us?
The story begins with an Oceanographer named Roger Revelle. He served with the Navy in World War II. After the war he became the Director of the Scripps Oceanographic Institute in La Jolla in San Diego, California. Revelle obtained major funding from the Navy to do measurements and research on the ocean around the Pacific Atolls where the US military was conducting post war atomic bomb tests. He greatly expanded the Institute's areas of interest and among others hired Hans Suess, a noted Chemist from the University of Chicago. Suess was very interested in the traces of carbon in the environment from the burning of fossil fuels. Revelle co-authored a scientific paper with Suess in 1957—a paper that raised the possibility that the atmospheric carbon dioxide might be creating a greenhouse effect and causing atmospheric warming. The thrust of the paper was a plea for funding for more studies. Funding, frankly, is where Revelle's mind was most of the time.
Next Revelle hired a Geochemist named David Keeling to devise a way to measure the atmospheric content of Carbon dioxide. In 1958 Keeling published his first paper showing the increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and linking the increase to the burning of fossil fuels. These two research papers became the bedrock of the science of global warming, even though they offered no proof that carbon dioxide was in fact a greenhouse gas. In addition they failed to explain how this trace gas, only a tiny fraction of the atmosphere, could have any significant impact on temperatures.
Back in the1950s, when this was going on, our cities were entrapped in a pall of pollution left by the crude internal combustion engines and poorly refined gasoline that powered cars and trucks back then, and from the uncontrolled emissions from power plants and factories. There was a valid and serious concern about the health consequences of this pollution. As a result a strong environmental movement was developing to demand action.
Government heard that outcry and set new environmental standards. Scientists and engineers came to the rescue. New reformulated fuels were developed, as were new high tech, computer controlled, fuel injection engines and catalytic converters. By the mid seventies cars were no longer significant polluters, emitting only some carbon dioxide and water vapor from their tail pipes. New fuel processing and smoke stack scrubbers were added to industrial and power plants and their emissions were greatly reduced as well.
But an environmental movement had been established and its funding and very existence depended on having a continuing crisis issue. Roger Revelle’s research at the Scripps Institute had tricked a wave of scientific inquiry. So the concept of uncontrollable atmospheric warming from the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels became the cornerstone issue of the environmental movement. Automobiles and power planets became the prime targets.
Revelle and Keeling used this new alarmism to keep their funding growing. Other researchers with environmental motivations and a hunger for funding saw this developing and climbed aboard as well. The research grants flowed and alarming hypotheses began to show up everywhere.
The Keeling curve continues to show a steady rise in CO2 in the atmosphere during the period since oil and coal were discovered and used by man. Carbon dioxide has increased from the 1958 reading of 315 to 385 parts per million in 2008. But, despite the increases, it is still only a trace gas in the atmosphere. The percentage of the atmosphere that is CO2 remains tiny, about 3.8 hundredths of one percent by volume and 41 hundredths of one percent by weight. And, by the way, only a fraction of that fraction is from mankind’s use of fossil fuels. The best estimate is that atmospheric CO2 is 75 percent natural and 25 percent the result of civilization.
Several hypotheses emerged in the 70s and 80s about how this tiny atmospheric component of CO2 might cause a significant warming. But they remained unproven. As years have passed, the scientists have kept reaching out for evidence of the warming and proof of their theories. And, the money and environmental claims kept on building up.
Back in the 1960s, this global warming research came to the attention of a Canadian born United Nation's bureaucrat named Maurice Strong. He was looking for issues he could use to fulfill his dream of one-world government. Strong organized a World Earth Day event in Stockholm, Sweden in 1970. From this he developed a committee of scientists, environmentalists and political operatives from the UN to continue a series of meetings.
"Agent of Her Majesty" Maurice Frederick Strong Strong, the founding chairman of Petro-Canada (1976-78) and former chairman of Ontario Hydro (1992-95), both Crown Corporations, is "an agent of Her Majesty." In Canada, Crown corporations are wholly owned and operated by the Canadian monarch, Elizabeth II, as the corporation's sole shareholder. This follows the legal premise that the British Crown, as an institution, owns all the property of government at the federal and provincial level. As the Canadian Encyclopedia says, "A central rationale of crown corporations is that the commercial activities of government, to be performed successfully, must be shielded from government intervention and legislative oversight."
Strong developed the concept that the UN could demand payments from the advanced nations for the climatic damage from their burning of fossil fuels to benefit the underdeveloped nations—a sort of CO2 tax that would be the funding for his one-world government. But he needed more scientific evidence to support his primary thesis. So Strong championed the establishment of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN IPCC). This was not a pure, “climate study” scientific organization, as we have been led to believe. It was an organization of one-world government UN bureaucrats, environmental activists and environmentalist scientists who craved UN funding so they could produce the science they needed to stop the burning of fossil fuels.
Over the last 25 years the IPCC has been very effective. Hundreds of scientific papers, four major international meetings and reams of news stories about climatic Armageddon later, it has made its points to the satisfaction of most governments and even shared in a Nobel Peace Prize.
At the same time Maurice Strong was busy at the UN, things were getting a bit out of hand for the man who is now called the grandfather of global warming, Roger Revelle. He had been very politically active in the late 1950's as he worked to have the University of California locate a San Diego campus adjacent to Scripps Institute in La Jolla. He won that major war, but lost an all important battle afterward when he was passed over in the selection of the first Chancellor of the new campus.
He left Scripps finally in 1963 and moved to Harvard University to establish a Center for Population Studies. It was there that Revelle inspired one of his students. This student would say later, "It felt like such a privilege to be able to hear about the readouts from some of those measurements in a group of no more than a dozen undergraduates. Here was this teacher presenting something not years old but fresh out of the lab, with profound implications for our future!" The student described him as "a wonderful, visionary professor" who was "one of the first people in the academic community to sound the alarm on global warming." That student was Al Gore. He thought of Dr. Revelle as his mentor and referred to him frequently, relaying his experiences as a student in his book “Earth in the Balance,” published in 1992.
So there it is. Roger Revelle was indeed the grandfather of global warming. His work had laid the foundation for the UN IPCC, provided the anti-fossil fuel ammunition to the environmental movement and sent Al Gore on his road to his books, his movie “An Inconvenient Truth,” his Nobel Peace Prize and a hundred million dollars from the carbon credits business.
The global warming frenzy was becoming the cause célèbre of the media. After all, the media is mostly liberal, loves Al Gore, loves to warn us of impending disasters and tell us "the sky is falling, the sky is falling." The politicians and the environmentalist loved it, too.
But the tide was turning with Roger Revelle. He was forced out at Harvard at 65 and returned to California and a semi retirement position at UCSD. There he had time to rethink Carbon Dioxide and the greenhouse effect. The man who had inspired Al Gore and given the UN the basic research it needed to launch its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was having second thoughts. In 1988 he wrote two cautionary letters to members of Congress. He wrote, "My own personal belief is that we should wait another 10 or 20 years to really be convinced that the greenhouse effect is going to be important for human beings, in both positive and negative ways." He added, "…we should be careful not to arouse too much alarm until the rate and amount of warming becomes clearer."
And in 1991 Revelle teamed up with Chauncey Starr, founding director of the Electric Power Research Institute and Fred Singer, the first director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Service, to write an article for Cosmos magazine. They urged more research and begged scientists and governments not to move too fast to curb greenhouse CO2 emissions because the true impact of carbon dioxide was not at all certain, and curbing the use of fossil fuels could have a huge, negative impact on the economy, jobs, and our standard of living. Considerable controversy still surrounds the authorship of this article. However, I have discussed this collaboration with Dr. Singer and he assures me that Revelle was considerably more certain than he was at the time that carbon dioxide was not a problem.
Did Roger Revelle attend the summer enclave at the Bohemian Grove in Northern California in 1990 while working on that article? Did he deliver a lakeside speech there to the assembled movers and shakers from Washington and Wall Street in which he apologized for sending the UN IPCC and Al Gore on this wild goose chase about global warming? Did he say that the key scientific conjecture of his lifetime had turned out wrong? The answer to those questions is, "Apparently.” People who were there have told me about that afternoon, but I have not located a transcript or a recording. People continue to share their memories with me on an informal basis. More evidence may be forthcoming.
Roger Revelle died of a heart attack three months after the Cosmos story was printed. Oh, how I wish he were still alive today. He might be able to stop this scientific silliness and end the global warming scam. He might well stand beside me as a global warming denier.
Al Gore has dismissed Roger Revelle’s mea culpa as the actions of a senile old man. The next year, while running for Vice President, he said the science behind global warming is settled and there will be no more debate. From 1992 until today, he and most of his cohorts have refused to debate global warming and when asked about us skeptics, they insult us and call us names.
As the science now stands, the global warming alarmist scientists say the climate is sensitive to a “radiative forcing” effect from atmospheric carbon dioxide which greatly magnifies its greenhouse effect on atmospheric warming. The only proof they can provide of this complex hypothesis is by running it in climate computer models. By starting the models in about 1980 they showed how the continuing increase in CO2 was step with a steady increase in average global temperatures in the 1980s and 1990’s and claim cause and effect. But, in fact, those last two decades of the 20th century were at the peak of a strong 24 year solar cycle, and the temperature increases actually may have been a result of the solar cycle together with related warm cycle ocean current patterns during that period.
That warming ended in 1998 and global temperatures (as measured by satellites) leveled off. Starting in 2002, computer models and reality have dramatically parted company. The models predicted temperatures and carbon dioxide would continue to rise in lock step, but in fact while the CO2 continues to rise, temperatures are in decline. Now global temperatures are in such a nose dive there is wide spread talk from climatologists about an impending ice age. In any case, the UN’s computer model “proof” has gone up in a poof.
Nonetheless, today we have the continued claim that carbon dioxide is the culprit of an uncontrollable, runaway man-made global warming. We are told that when we burn fossil fuels we are leaving a dastardly carbon footprint. And, we are told we must pay Al Gore or the environmentalists for this sinful footprint. Our governments on all levels are considering taxing the use of fossil fuels. The Federal Environmental Protection Agency is on the verge of naming CO2 as a pollutant and strictly regulating its use to protect our climate. The new President and the US Congress are on board. Many state governments are moving on the same course.
We are already suffering from this CO2 silliness in many ways. Our energy policy has been strictly hobbled by the prohibiting of new refineries and of drilling for decades. We pay for the shortage this has created every time we buy gas. On top of that, the whole issue of corn based ethanol costs us millions of tax dollars in subsidies, which also has driven up food prices. All of this is a long way from over.
Yet I am totally convinced there is no scientific basis for any of it.
Global Warming: It is a hoax. It is bad science. It is hijacking public policy. It is the greatest scam in history.
Originally written January 28, 2009 (Revised and edited February 11, 2009)
The Liberty Lobby's Mark Lane and the Jonestown Massacre
October 16, 2009
None are so hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes. -Johann von Goethe
One of the reasons the American people are unable to resist the Zionist criminal network that controls the U.S. government and media is that the so-called patriotic movement is controlled by the same criminal network.
A supporter from Scotland often writes to me asking if I have heard Michael Piper's latest rant against me on the Republic Broadcasting Network. Three years after I was fired from American Free Press where I had submitted articles for six years as an independent contractor, Piper, who is one of that paper's key figures, is still attacking me. Why would Piper, who works for a newspaper that purports to be a publication for patriotic Americans, spend so much time attacking me and my 9-11 research? Who is paying him and ordering him to do this? To understand why Piper acts like a rabid dog requires a better understanding of what American Free Press really is -- and who is behind it.
Having raised the subject of the Jewish lawyer/C.I.A. agent Mark Lane and his key role in controlling the Liberty Lobby in my essay "Why Are We Unable to Resist?", the subject of American Free Press (AFP) being a controlled-opposition outfit came up during my October 6 show with R.J. Hender on Republic Broadcasting Network. A caller, "Daniel from Canada", asked if I would now agree that Michael Piper of AFP had been correct in his criticism of Eric Hufschmid. Piper then attacked me on his program on RBN, which led to this email from a listener.
I heard a host on RBN railing against you tonight in an incredibly vile manner. [Michael] Collins Piper, I believe, was his name. He was so nasty that right away I found myself sympathizing with you. Anyway, after he got to the gist of his attacks and mentioned that you had accused Mark Lane of being an agent, I was completely won over to you. I have known since 1977 that he was an agent and spent a few years telling anyone who might be interested of that fact. I would remind Collins Piper or anyone who doubts this is true, that Mr. Lane was in Jonestown (CIA mind control project) at the time of the massacre. He survived because he is very well connected to say the least. Keep up the good work.
Mark Lane, the Jewish lawyer and C.I.A. agent who owns Liberty Lobby and American Free Press, was born in New York City in 1927, the son of Harry Arnold and Elizabeth Levin (Levin was changed to Lane in the 1920s). Charles Garry, the principal lawyer for Jim Jones and his People's Temple movment, blamed Lane for the mass killing of 913 Americans in Jonestown in November 1978. Lane reportedly went to Switzerland with the business manager of Jonestown shortly after the mass killing and emptied Jones' secret bank accounts. The missing funds, estimated to be as much as $18 million, were never accounted for.
Some of the 914 American victims of Jim Jones' mind control project in Guyana
Michael Bernard Piper has worked for Mark Lane for many years.
It should be noted that Michael Piper, who brags about his Jewish ancestors and carries a portfolio from AIPAC, the Israeli lobby in Washington, lies a great deal and does so as a representative of Mark Lane and American Free Press. This behaviour is typical of people who have the backing of an agency like the C.I.A. behind them. Piper lies and slanders with impunity because he has what we call "a license to lie." Piper has been attacking me since December 2001 when I was invited to speak about 9-11 in Moscow. He continues his vicious attacks to this day. He is obviously being paid to do so. Why would a person like Piper be attacking me for my research on 9-11? Why did Piper work to keep me from speaking in Moscow in December 2001 and again at the American Free Press conference held in Washington two weeks after I was attacked and tortured with a TASER by a three-man undercover tactical squad at my home near Chicago?
Mark Lane (center) with Rev. Jim Jones (left) and Charles Garry in Jonestown shortly before the mass killing of some 914 Americans. Jones' "hand went to his mouth again and again" which his followers knew to be a sign that their leader was extremely nervous and stressed. The reason Jones was so stressed was because of the lies he was being told by Mark Lane, who was working to fuel Jones' paranoia. The lies and actions of Lane were seen by Garry as having directly triggered the mass killing in Jonestown. Why would Lane, a former agent of U.S. Army intelligence who knew very well of Jones' paranoia and his plans to kill everyone if threatened, do something like that? Why is Lane smiling with a devilish grin in this photo, taken on the eve of the massacre? (Photo by Jonestown victim Don Jackson from "Exclusive photos: Prelude to tragedy," Chicago Tribune, November 30, 1978)
In a 1979 panel discussion on "Cults and the Law" at the California Bar Association's convention in Los Angeles, Mr. Charles Garry, who was the principal attorney for Jim Jones and his organization, accused Mark Lane of being responsible for the mass deaths. He said Lane had played upon Jones' irrational fears of a United States Government plot against the Jones cult, provoking Mr. Jones into ordering the killings and suicides. "The person responsible was the catalyst," said Mr. Garry. "He may not be legally responsible, but he is morally."
In September 1978, unbeknownst to Garry, Lane visited Jim Jones and spoke to the residents of Jonestown, supporting Jones' theories and drawing parallels between Martin Luther King, Jr. and Jim Jones. Lane held press conferences stating that "none of the charges" against the People's Temple "are accurate or true." Lane fed Jones' fear and paranoia saying there was a "massive conspiracy" against the Temple by "intelligence organizations," naming the C.I.A., F.B.I., F.C.C., and even the U.S. Post Office.
Garry, the principal lawyer for the Peoples' Temple, had been with Lane at Jonestown during the massacre. According to Garry, Lane's devious duplicity was "the catalyst" that directly led to the massacre. Garry said that Lane, "behind my back, proceeded to, beginning in September , when he was there, to tell them they were being persecuted. That the F.B.I. and the C.I.A., whatever, all the intelligence forces, were out to destroy them. And that he himself was going to be the person who was going to stop all of that." By reinforcing Jones' fears, Garry said, Lane contributed to an atmosphere in which the white night [pre-planned massacre/suicide] would occur.
"EITHER THIS IS THE FUTURE OR THERE WON'T BE ANY"
Mark Lane visited Jonestown in September 1978, two months before Jim Jones took 913 of his followers to their gruesome end in the jungle of Guyana. Lane lavished praise on the mind control settlement and its paranoid leader. Lane told the mind-controlled subjects of Jonestown that they had found a better way of life in the jungle with Jones than they could have in the United States. Lane's speech to Jones and his followers from September 1978 was recorded and used in a 1981 National Public Radio (NPR) documentary about Jonestown entitled "Father Cares: The Last of Jonestown." Anthony Lewis wrote about Lane's visit and support of the Jonestown mind control project in a New York Times article entitled "Nightmare Brought to Life" in April 1981:
Two months before the Rev. Jim Jones took his followers to their gruesome end in 1978, Jones had a visitor from the United States who praised the settlement and its paranoid leader. People in the United States knew there had to be a better way of life, he said, "and it is here."
As the disciples murmured and applauded, the visitor said he had travelled in Guyana on a 19th-century train, a relic of colonialism. "And then you come here. And you just don't come up to the 20th century. You're in the future all of a sudden. It's a big move. And either this is the future or there won't be any."
It was Mark Lane speaking: the lawyer-promoter who has so relentlessly exploited American assassinations. We have come to know Lane over his years of grisly self-promotion. But it is still something to hear his voice praising Jonestown - and Jim Jones giggling in the background and saying, "That's so true."
James Reston Jr. visited Jonestown shortly after the massacre and found some nine hundred hours worth of audio tapes made by Jones of his speeches and interviews. Reston, who described Jones as "authentic evil" went on to write a book about Jonestown entitled Our Father Who Art in Hell. These tapes were used to produce the NPR documentary that Anthony Lewis wrote about. Lewis said that Lane's secret visit to Jonestown in September 1978 was a key factor of the "authentic evil":
Anthony Lewis of the New York Times wrote about Mark Lane's devilish character. Lane's devious duplicity with Jim Jones is seen by those who were there as having led directly to the massacre.
Less than one month after the mass killing, Lane reportedly travelled to Switzerland with Terri Buford, the business manager of Jonestown, "to remove the secret Zurich assets," according to Robert Havel, spokesman for the U.S. Justice Department. The secret funds, estimated to be as much as $18 million, were never accounted for. Lane denied he had removed the money, saying he had spent 5 days in Paris.
MARK LANE & THE LIBERTY LOBBY
A few years after the massacre in Jonestown, Lane became the lawyer of Willis A. Carto and the so-called patriotic and anti-Semitic Liberty Lobby. The Liberty Lobby is patriotic in the same way that Jones and the People's Temple was a Christian church. To understand the true nature and real mission of American Free Press we need to examine Mark Lane's key role in running the Liberty Lobby. When we realize that Lane holds the key position as owner of the lobby and its assets, the strange actions of Michael Piper become understandable. This explains Piper's bizarre attacks on me and his strange relationship with Willis A. Carto and his German-born wife, Elisabeth. Piper is working for Mark Lane, not Willis Carto.
Mark Lane took over the assets of the Liberty Lobby in or around 1993, when the lobby was on the verge of bankruptcy. This information came directly from L.T. Patterson, the publisher of Criminal Politics, who was sued by Lane in 1994 for some $10 million. Patterson was able to fend off Lane, a Zionist wolf in sheep's clothing, and during the legal process learned that Lane owned the Liberty Lobby. When I asked Willis A. Carto if this was true, he swore at me on the phone and slammed down the receiver. Since my office at the lobby/newspaper was connected to Willis Carto's (from the summer of 2000) and having seen Lane, Carto, and Piper together on many occasions, I don't doubt for a minute that Patterson's information is true. I have never seen anything that would contradict it. This would mean that the so-called right-wing patriotic and anti-Semitic publications of the Liberty Lobby, such as the Spotlight and American Free Press, are actually controlled-opposition outfits controlled by the Zionist Jew, Mark Lane. This explains all the bizarre behavior I observed at the paper during my six years of working with the lobby and its publications.
When I spoke with Suzanne, Lane's first wife, about his work in Army Intelligence, she joked that he was the head of the C.I.A. Her joke is evidently not far from the truth.
Lane, it should be noted, was in U.S. Army intelligence in post-war Germany in 1945-47. This is the branch that became the C.I.A. after the war. Lane was paid some $5 million in legal fees by the Liberty Lobby, according to a veteran of the lobby. None of this is widely known among the people who read and support American Free Press. It is important because it shows how a Zionist Jew from the C.I.A. can actually control a movement that purports to be working for the American patriot audience. Lane's controlling role at the Liberty Lobby should be kept in mind when viewing the photos from his visit to Jonestown. Lane was a lawyer for Jim Jones and was present before, during, and after the mass killing.
Mark Lane (left) with Jonestown residents shortly before the killing. He witnessed the mass murder and reappeared shortly after having "gone missing."
"It is all swirling around Mark Lane..."
Rogers Worthington of the Chicago Tribune wrote that the gruesome events in Jonestown all seemed to revolve around Mark Lane:
Through it all is the tantalizing hint that Lane knows still more than he is willing to tell. Indeed, there are moments when events connected to Jonestown and the Peoples Temple seem to revolve around Mark Lane.
On one hand he obviously mourns the needless loss of so many lives, and on the the other hand he appears to be having the time of his life...
But somehow when Lane utters such charges today, as is often his wont, the credibility goes awash. The early bird of conspiracy theories can ruminate about Peoples Temple hit lists and secret assassination squads, and say things like "there is a force at work..." It's, ironically, the same phrase used by a now-dead Jonestown resident in describing to a Washington Post reporter the problems of the Peoples Temple: "...some force is working to disrupt and agitate..."
It is all swirling around Mark Lane, who is counsel, witness, and participant, and there are times when it just may be too much.
"I feel at this point there's no place to go to," he said. "I feel like the guy Robert Redford played in 'Three Days of the Condor,' at the end, that there's no place for good guys to go."
Six years later, Mark Lane found his place at the so-called patriotic, right-wing, and anti-Semitic Liberty Lobby working for Willis A. Carto. The Jewish lawyer Lane did very well for himself working for the anti-Semitic Willis Carto, so well in fact that with some of the $5 million he received in legal fees for defending the Liberty Lobby he was able to buy the lobby in 1993 and continue sowing fear among gullible Americans.
As Anthony Lewis wrote in his 1978 article about Lane entitled "The Mark of Zorro":
If another Mark Lane were passing judgment on these activities, he would surely sense a conspiracy to sow doubt and division in the country, to encourage morbid obsessions. I have always assumed that he was just a pitchman with an exceptional talent for preying on the gullible.
One would have to be extremely naive to think that Mark Lane was nothing more than that.
Sources and Recommended Reading (linked to original news articles):
After sending out the Citizen Action Plan to more than 500 readers asking them to bring the evidence of super-thermite to the attention of the media and government officials, I received very interesting comments from people who were or who claimed to be active members of the 9-11 truth movement, but who are now opposed to doing anything - now that we have scientific proof that the World Trade Center was blown up with super-thermite! Here I respond:
A Second Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid "...we are wasting our time if we search for more details about 9/11..." Eric Hufschmid to Bollyn, 16 May 2009
Your comments are, as usual, very hostile and clearly designed to sow suspicion about me and other 9-11 researchers such as Dr. Steven E. Jones. If anyone, such as Leon, should wonder why I can't work with you all they have to do is look at the things you have written about me. This latest piece is just a continuation of your agenda of sowing suspicion about me and what I write. You are the author of the ridiculous nonsense that I have been kidnapped and that I am not writing my own articles. You continue with this rubbish to this very day. You obviously have no intention of helping me as your comments clearly indicate. You have not even posted any of my very important articles about 9-11 since mid-2007, when I was forced to leave Chicago.
Either you don't understand the depth and extent of the international Zionist apparatus that convicted me and would have sent me to Cook County Jail, or you don't want to talk about it. Your sister's husband, James Murdoch, is a key player in the Zionist-controlled media and "heir-apparent" to his billionaire father Rupert Murdoch, a major Elder of Zion. Your mother's husband, a Jew or half-Jewish immigrant from Berlin if I remember correctly, is probably also a member, at least he would certainly be suspected as being one if we applied the same racial criteria that you do. Yet it is you who cast the most hostile slander and unfair suspicion on real 9-11 researchers, like me and Dr. Steven E. Jones. It appears that spreading suspicion and hatred is your only real agenda, besides appearing to be a newly-born and irrational anti-Semite. You say that researching 9-11 is a waste of time but you seem to have plenty of time to waste on smearing honest 9-11 researchers like myself.
James Murdoch is considered to be the son who will succeed his father Rupert at the helm of global media conglomerate News Corporation. James Murdoch is Eric Hufschmid's brother-in-law. Eric's father, Edward, is father-in-law to James and grandfather to two of Rupert Murdoch's grandchildren. Eric Hufschmid is an uncle to two of Rupert Murdoch's grandchildren. What a small world!
As was made clear during my trial, the people behind the attack on me in Cook County (Chicago) are the same people who are behind making Obama the president. It is not just a local problem in Cook County with a couple trumped-up misdemeanor charges caused by a few bad undercover police from Hoffman Estates. The people behind the brutal attack on me in August 2006 are from the very same Zionist network that is behind the 9-11 attacks and cover-up and which has attacked me for years. This network, which is based within the secret organization of Jewish Freemasons of B'nai B'rith, has a global reach and influences national governments around the world. Rupert Murdoch is at the top of this Zionist apparatus.
As I recall, you did not know anything about the Zionist criminal network until I explained the history of Zionism to you over a period of many months.
If I recall correctly, your book does not mention anything about the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. I may be wrong, but I do not recall that you wrote anything that would inform the reader of your book that there has been a great deal of evidence of Israeli involvement in this crime since the day it occurred. 9-11 is clearly the greatest crime of the 21st Century, which began on January 1, 2000 - something you and your astute readers don't seem to understand. Dresden and crimes that occurred before 2000 are crimes that belong to the 20th Century. Centuries begin with the years that end with 00 and continue through for the next hundred years. You might want to point that out to your daffy reader who is critical of my calling 9-11 the "crime of the century." Perhaps you can tell me which crime that has occurred since 2000 is more heinous than 9-11. Maybe I missed something along the way, being so engrossed in solving 9-11 as I have been.
When I visited you in Santa Barbara, I saw that you worked very closely with your father who helped you with your book by doing things to promote the book and get it sent out to people. Your father, Edward, is also the father of Kathryn Hufschmid, who is married to James Murdoch, the "heir-apparent" of Rupert Murdoch -- one of the biggest Zionist media moguls in the world and one of the prime suspects of the false flag terror attacks of 9-11.
Murdoch's FOX News was the first media outlet that tried to smear me as an anti-Semite. How odd that you seem to be engaged in doing the exact same thing from another angle. Your father, with whom you work very closely, is the father-in-law of Murdoch's brightest son, James, and is the grandfather to the two Murdoch children born to James and Kathryn Hufschmid Murdoch. James is also said to be very close to his 77-year-old father and speaks to him each day on the phone.
I find it hard to believe that Kathryn, your half-sister, who is married into the family of the multi-billionaire Rupert Murdoch, does not communicate with her father in California. Your half-sister Kathryn Anne Hufschmid was born in Santa Barbara on 14 November 1971, when you were already 16 years old. She is described in a recent article in Intelligent Life magazine: "a former marketing executive and model from Oregon, Kathryn Hufschmid, who now works for the Clinton Climate Initiative, the environmental arm of the former president’s foundation." In the late 1990s, Kathryn was involved in creating a new Bob Guccione Jr. magazine for men called Gear. James submitted cartoons for the same magazine, which featured scantily clad women. James is the son of Rupert Murdoch and Anna Maria Tõrv, whose Estonian father, Jakob, was a seaman who had settled in Scotland. After the Tõrv family emmigrated to Australia in the mid-1950s, her Scottish mother abandoned the family leaving Anna to care for her younger siblings.
Anna Maria Tõrv, Rupert Murdoch's second wife, is the daughter of an Estonian seaman. Anna Tõrv Murdoch-Mann is the mother of James.
Public records show that Kathryn Hufschmid lived in Salem, Oregon until she was at least 22 years old and that your father, Edward, lived nearby. It certainly appears that your father and his daughter Kathryn were in close contact when she was working as a model in her early 20s.
Now that Kathryn is married to James Murdoch, she certainly has the money to make phone calls and visit and there is no reason why she would not help out her old dad in Santa Barbara. He is, after all, her father and the grandfather of her two children. Your dad and Rupert Murdoch are actually quite close, they are the two grandfathers of Anneka (6) and Walter Murdoch (3). You are an uncle to two of Rupert Murdoch's grandchildren. A closer family relationship to the Murdoch family is hard to imagine.
The Murdochs in 2008 - James is on the left with his wife, Kathryn Hufschmid. Eric Hufschmid's father is James' father-in-law and grandfather, with Rupert, of their two small children. Rupert Murdoch, a devoted Zionist, made a film that depicted the exact events of 9-11 - in 2000.
The Murdochs are important because they have been major players in the cover-up of 9-11 and propagandists pushing the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I find it hard to imagine that they have not contacted you. I suspect they are actually supporting your ridiculous calls for anti-Semitic violence, which are as dangerous as they are stupid. Oddly, despite your anti-Semitic writings and calls for violence, nothing has happened to you or your comfortable life in Santa Barbara. The worst thing that has happened to you is that serious 9-11 researchers ignore you. It's certainly not hard to see why - you seem ridiculous.
Lastly, your comments clearly show that you are not interested in any further investigation of 9-11. Finding the people who put tons of super-thermite in the World Trade Center does not interest you in the slightest. This makes no sense at all. You spend several years writing and speaking about 9-11 and when solid proof is finally found of super-thermite in the twin towers, you say discussing it is a waste of time! You even go so far as to say that we "waste our lives" discussing the evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the WTC. How much sense does that make?
In your unscientific way of thinking, you wrote in your book that the molten metal pouring off the WTC 2 was probably liquified human remains. Rather than seriously address the evidence of molten iron and the scientific evidence of super-thermite -- and investigate who put tons of nano-composite thermite in the World Trade Center, you want to promote a anti-Semitic crusade against Jews. I am sorry, Eric, but I can see no reason why I would even want to talk with you. I sincerely hope that Leon can understand me.
You wrote about yourself in your posting about my recent radio show: "I stopped investigating 9/11 several years ago. I think we have more than enough evidence to prove that the World Trade Center was demolished with explosives..."
and later: "...we are wasting our time if we search for more details about 9/11..."
and again: "Nothing will improve if we waste our lives discussing the latest report about thermite from the suspicious Professor Steven Jones."
and finally: "We've already done enough of an analysis of 9/11, the HoloHoax, etc. We don't need any more details about these crimes."
Eric, it is clear to me that talking with you is a "waste of time." You have no intention of helping solve 9-11. As you say in your own words, finding the individuals who carried out the "crime of the century" is "wasting our time."
I'm sorry that you see it that way and are so hostile and unfriendly to real 9-11 researchers. It's really quite pitiful.
Response No. 1
Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid 12 May 2009
I don't have any interest in 9/11 because nobody has been asking me for details about 9/11 for many years. - Eric Hufschmid, author of Painful Questions, in a message to Christopher Bollyn on May 8, 2009
I am writing to you about your clear and stated lack of interest in the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center and the 9-11 truth movement.
Your recently-stated lack of interest in 9-11 is nothing new, as you and I both know. Years ago you encouraged me to give up my research on 9-11. You never expressed any interest in the thermite evidence. You wouldn't even come to Utah, from California, to meet with Dr. Steven E. Jones when I invited you to meet him in March 2006. Now that Dr. Jones has produced scientific proof of super-thermite in the dust of the WTC -- you don't show the slightest interest. You have not even presented this crucial discovery on your website. First you claimed to be a 9-11 activist for the truth, with family ties to Rupert Murdoch and all of that -- and now that we have solid scientific proof of an inside conspiracy to pulverize the twin towers, you avoid it.
Eric, your interest in 9-11 has always been rather superficial. I recall a comment that you wrote in your book, when you talk about the molten metal falling from the tower. Because you could not accept that it was molten metal, you wrote something about it being liquified human remains. Utter nonsense, of course, but it did not stop you from putting it in your book. As twisted and ridiculous as it sounds, you went ahead and published it.
Now, regarding your last email to me on Friday, May 8:
ERIC HUFSCHMID wrote: My lack of interest in 9/11 is NOT like [Michael] Rupert or [Gregory] Zeigler. I don't have any interest in 9/11 because nobody has been asking me for details about 9/11 for many years.
BOLLYN: Wrong. Your "lack of interest" is exactly like theirs. You are not interested because nobody is asking you for details? What kind of excuse is that? I am interested in solving 9-11 because it is an immense crime that demands to be solved. Nobody ever asks me for any details about 9/11. But how would that change anything? This is a very irrational response. Are you only writing about things that some people ask you about?
HUFSCHMID wrote: I am getting a lot more questions about you and your family, Zionism, the Holocaust, the Apollo moon landing, and Jews in general. In fact, I have had more questions over the past year about how you can receive money sent to a P.O. Box in Chicago.
BOLLYN: My post office box is in Hoffman Estates, not Chicago. Have you and your readers never heard of mail forwarding? How much of a mystery is that? If that is the mystery that has you and your readers stumped I would say that you must not get many good questions.
HUFSCHMID wrote: And your question about why I would want to help you with your website when I'm not interested in 9/11 sounds like subtle Jewish propaganda. I was offering to help you regardless of what the content of your articles were. You could write about the sinking of the Estonia, or Bernie Madoff, or anything else. I don't care.
BOLLYN: But you don't help me at all. You don't even post my articles and you claim that I am kidnapped. Why would I want help from you? You have been nothing but a one-man wrecking crew against me and my family since I was forced to leave Chicago in June 2007. Since then you have spread vicious lies and slander about me in an effort to attack my credibility and sow suspicion about my character. You obviously don't give a damn about 9-11, which is the main thrust of my work. Why, pray tell, would I have anything to do with you?
HUFSCHMID wrote: What happened to that interview between you and Susie of the Patriot Dames? Don't tell me you're too busy for an interview. It only takes an hour or two for you to talk to her.
BOLLYN: I didn't do an interview with Patriot Dames nor did I make plans to do one. Who are the Patriot Dames, anyway? They wrote me an email but never told me anything about their show or who they were. I couldn't find any of their interviews on the website that I was able to listen to. I will be on with Barbara Jean on RBN this Friday, at least I plan to be. I am not going to go on the air with people I don't know or who are only agents of entrapment. Your radio career with Darrel B. Setters (a.k.a. Darrel Bradford Smith), a person you had never even met, showed me enough about that. When you and Smith began fomenting violence on your show, I quit talking with you. I won't step in the same bucket twice. People can be thrown in jail for many years for inciting violence. I do not support violence as a solution to anything.
HUFSCHMID wrote: Your strange behavior is frightening people...
BOLLYN: My strange behavior is frightening people? Exactly what do you mean by that? Tell me one thing that I have done or said that can be considered strange by a rational observer. Eric, really, it is you who is not making sense.
I hope my comments help you to see the error of your ways and bring you to your senses about the importance of dealing with the evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center.