Print Contact Articles by Subject 9-11 Archive 2007

9-11 Planes Flew Directly into Secure Computer Rooms in Both Towers

January 11, 2007

9-11 remains an unsolved crime of terrorism. Many people who worked at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have information, which can help solve this crime and find the parties responsible for killing thousands of innocent people.

This article, for example, is the result of information provided by one such anonymous person. To solve this crime, it is crucial that the people who have information come forward and share that information. Together, we can solve this heinous crime and make this world a better place.


The two airplanes that struck the twin towers of the World Trade Center on 9-11 flew directly into secure computer rooms in both buildings. Is that merely a coincidence or were the computer rooms equipped to play a role in the crime? Were there homing devices, for example, in the computer rooms that guided the planes to their targets? Were there pre-placed explosives or Thermite on these floors that created the spectacular explosions while destroying the evidence and assisting with the collapses? Let's look at the evidence.
Both planes flew directly into computer room like this.

"At 8:46:30 a.m., five hijackers flew American Airlines Flight 11 (AA 11) with 11 crew and 76 passengers into the north face of WTC 1," according to the Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, Sept. 2005):

The aircraft flew almost straight toward the North Tower, banked approximately 25 degrees to the left (i.e. the right wing elevated relative to the left wing) and descended at an angle of about 10 degrees at impact.

Moving at about 440 mph, the nose hit the exterior of the tower at the 96th floor. The aircraft cut a gash that was over half the width of the building and extended from the 93rd floor to the 99th floor.

All but the lowest of these floors were occupied by Marsh & McLennan, a worldwide insurance company, which also occupied the 100th floor.
"The fuselage was centered on the 96th floor slab and filled the 95th and 96th floors top to bottom," the NIST report says. So, what was on the 95th and 96th floors of the North Tower, which were occupied by Marsh & McLennan, Lewis Paul "Jerry" Bremer's company?

Bremer, it should be noted, was the Bush-appointed proconsul or administrator of occupied Iraq until the end of June 2004. During Bremer's reign there was no metering of the oil exported from Iraq. Previously, Bremer served as the right-hand man for Henry Kissinger & Associates.

Decisions made by Jerry Bremer, Kissinger's partner since the 1970s, are largely responsible for the misery and chaos that have afflicted Iraq since the U.S.-led occupation began.
Lewis Paul Bremer (center) was Kissinger's man in Iraq. Here the U.S. proconsul walks through Fallujah with David Petraeus in 2003. (AFP)

The NIST report provides some information about "General Description of Tenant Layout." For the floors in question it says, "Generally open space filled with workstations. Offices, conference rooms, and work areas in exterior corners." But on the 95th floor, Marsh & McLennan had a "large walled data center along north and east sides," according to the NIST report. And that's exactly where the plane hit – the north wall of the 95th floor.

I called Marsh & McLennan to get a better idea of what was in this "large walled data center" into which American Airlines Flight 11 plunged with deadly precision. Reginald McQuay came on the line as a company spokesman. I told McQuay that Marsh & McLennan got hit broadside on 9-11 and that it appeared that the plane flew straight into their "walled data center," according to the NIST report. "No," McQuay said, "it wasn't really our data center. It was our computer center." Then he suddenly became somewhat distressed, saying he could not even focus on what I was saying and that I should call back next week.

Fair enough, I thought. McQuay had confirmed my primary suspicion that the plane that struck the North Tower appears to have been "homed in" or targeted on a secure computer center on the 95th floor – exactly like the plane that struck the South Tower some 16 minutes later.


"Sixteen and a half minutes after the first impact, five hijackers flew United Airlines (UA) Flight 175, with 9 crew and 51 passengers, into WTC 2 at about 540 mph, about 100 mph faster than AA Flight 11," the NIST report says. "The center of the nose of the plane struck at the 81st floor slab. The plane was banked 38 degrees to the left (right wing upward) and was heading slightly (6 degrees) downward from the horizontal," it says.
The noses of both planes flew directly into secure computer rooms.

Although Flight 175 went straight into the 81st floor of the South Tower, the NIST report provides no description of what was on the 81st floor. Not even one word. How odd. While we know that the Fuji Bank was the tenant on floors 79-82 of WTC 2, the NIST report fails to describe the "tenant layout" of floors 79, 81, and 82. I had repeatedly requested information from NIST about the layout of these floors, primarily because many tons of molten metal were seen falling from the 81st floor prior to the collapse.
The source of the large amount of molten metal on the 81st floor had not been explained. What could have possibly melted in such large amounts on a normal floor to create several cubic meters of molten metal?
Extremely hot molten iron cascaded from the 81st floor shortly before the collapse of WTC 2.
If this was molten iron, as Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University says, and if this molten iron was caused by an aluminothermic reaction of Thermite or Thermate (steel-cutting explosives created from powdered aluminum, iron oxide, and sulfur), then somebody must have pre-loaded the 81st floor of WTC 2 with several tons of a form of Thermite.
The molten metal seen falling from the 81st floor was not aluminum, as the NIST report suggests, because molten aluminum would appear silverish-grey in daylight conditions. The metal that is seen falling from the burning South Tower is clearly yellow and white hot. This metal is clearly much hotter than the fires that were observed. So, what could have produced such large amounts of extremely hot molten metal on the 81st floor of WTC 2?
The aluminum oxide that is produced in the Thermite or Thermate reaction is a whitish smoke. White smoke was seen coming from the 81st floor prior to each flow of molten metal, according to the NIST report, and large amounts of white smoke are seen prior to and during the collapse of each tower. Was this drywall dust or was this Thermite?
Photo: The white smoke is coming from the corner of the South Tower where the molten iron later poured out of.
Photo: A close-up of the corner of the South Tower where the molten iron poured from.
Photo: The South Tower starts to collapse. Molten iron was blown out of the tower when the explosives went off. As the droplets cooled they turned red, creating a spray of red globules mixed with the white clouds of dust. Some of the whiteness may be due to the spray of aluminum oxide particles.
I imagined huge disguised flower pots of powdered Thermite near the elevators of a normal office floor of the South Tower, but even that didn't make sense. Furthermore, if the 81st floor was a normal office floor of Fuji Bank, why doesn't the NIST report simply say so? Silence was all I ever received from NIST.
Then, out of the blue, a former bank employee came forward, a person who had visited the 81st floor on a weekly basis. His information explains more than he probably thought and provides us with a major clue about what really happened on 9-11. Fuji Bank had torn up the 81st floor, he said, and stripped it down to reinforce the trusses so that the floor could hold more weight. Then they had built a raised floor and filled the entire floor with server-size Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) batteries. These units were bolted to the raised floor which stood about 3 feet above the reinforced 81st floor. Beneath the raised floor ran the cables and power supply that connected the army of batteries. IT techies had to get down on all fours and crawl around beneath the raised floor to connect cables.
"The whole floor was batteries," he said, "huge battery-looking things." They were "all black" and "solid, very heavy" things that had been brought in during the night. They had been put in place during the summer prior to 9-11, he said. But were they really batteries? "It's weird," he said. "They were never turned on." So, what really was on the 81st floor of WTC 2? What was in these heavy "battery-looking things?" Were they batteries, or were they Thermite?
The whole floor was full of batteries that were never turned on. Where they heavy packets of Thermite made to look like batteries?

Only senior Information Technology (IT) personnel from Fuji Bank, or the Japanese banks affiliated with it, had access to the 81st floor computer room, according to the source. The Mizuho Bank was established originally as Mizuho Holdings, Inc. by the merger of Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank (DKB), Fuji Bank and the Industrial Bank of Japan (IBJ) in 2000. According to the former bank employee, employees of Shimizu-America Corp. also had access to the floor.
Shortly after 9-11, the IBJ became the biggest player and took over the new corporation that had been created by the merger, primarily because the offices of the DKB and Fuji Bank had been destroyed in the World Trade Center, the source said. The offices of the IBJ were located on the Avenue of the Americas and became the new headquarters for the bank. The DKB and Fuji Bank personnel soon found themselves out of work.

"Nobody worked on that floor," the source said about Floor 81. The whole floor was taken up with a "whole bunch of batteries" and "enclosed server racks" that were so tall that one could not see over the top of them. The enclosed server racks were locked and the only people who could open them were employees of the Shimizu Corp., he said. Didn't the host of NIST scientists think that was worthy of mention? They either did not know that the 81st floor was full of "battery-looking things" or decided not to mention it. How odd.

William Torrey, the Atlanta-based senior vice president of Shimizu-America, said he could not say anything about the work that Shimizu did on the 81st floor because of ongoing litigation. Asked about the litigation, Torrey said he could not comment on that either. Seth Martin, the non-Japanese spokesman for the Mizuho Corp., could not give any comment for this article. Mr. Martin did not respond to repeated calls.

The NIST documents that accompany the final report confirm the source's information that Fuji Bank had reinforced the 81st floor. Documents dated 1999 say that reinforcements were added to the floor trusses "to accommodate the new UPS workspace." The structural engineering firm was noted as LERA, or Leslie E. Robertson and Associates.

Saw Teen See, a managing partner of LERA, said the firm was unable to comment on the work it had done on the 81st floor. "We are not at liberty to comment on this or to provide any further information," she wrote. "Please contact the PANYNJ who are the project owners." PANYNJ is the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

Fuji Bank & Trust reported 12 out of 125 Japanese expatriate employees missing the day after 9-11. Two American employees of Fuji Bank are also reported to have died on 9-11: Security officer Patrick Adams, 60, and John Andreacchio, 52. Both men were from New York.

The Occupation of Iraq is the "War in Iraq"

January 10, 2007
As Congress and the president debate whether to surge or not in the quagmire of Iraq, the fundamental fact avoided by the Zionist-controlled press and government spokesmen is that the occupation of Iraq is the war in Iraq, and vice versa.
That is to say that the so-called war in Iraq is nothing more than the violence associated with the military occupation. When the foreign armies leave Iraq, the war will end. It's that simple.
The illegal military occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, like the Zionist occupation of Palestine, are on-going acts of war and aggression that provoke and fuel conflict. The popular anti-occupation resistance movements in each country are the natural and legitimate responses to illegal occupation. Although seldom described in these terms in the U.S. media, the American people clearly understand that the exceedingly cruel occupation of Iraq is the underlying cause of the conflict that has ravaged that nation since the U.S.-led invasion of March 2003.
Recent public opinion polls (Dec. 2006) found that seventy percent of the U.S. public wants the new Congress to pressure the White House to begin bringing troops home within six months. Nearly 80 percent of the American public supports withdrawing almost all U.S. troops from Iraq by 2008 and engaging in negotiations with Iran and Syria.
Before the presidential speech on Iraq, White House press secretary Tony Snow said that the president's decision would not be swayed by public opinion polls. Snow's comment indicated that the Bush administration hopes "to bring the public back" to the extremely unpopular war. "The president will not shape policy according to public opinion, but he does understand that it's important to bring the public back to this war and restore public confidence and support for the mission," Snow said on January 9.
"The mood of the American people is patently clear," Professor Adel Safty wrote in a recent article. "They want an end to the Iraq war." In Iraq, more than 90 percent of the public wants the U.S. troops to leave immediately and a similar percentage say they were better off under Saddam Hussein.
A scan of recent stories from Iraq's most popular newspaper, Azzaman, reveals why the vast majority of the Iraqi public is so strongly opposed to the U.S. occupation:
December 4, 2006
Baghdad is turning into a wild city and is now almost completely under the mercy of savage militias and gunmen who have taken the law into their own hands. Kidnappings and assassinations take place at a scale never seen before and both U.S. and Iraqi troops are practically powerless in restoring any semblance of order anywhere in the city.
In fact most of the carnage taking place in the city goes unreported and the world only sees a fraction of the daily atrocities.
December 14, 2006
Nearly half of Iraqis able to work are idle, said Minister of Labor and Social Affairs. Mohamed Radhi said the high jobless rate was devastating to a country torn by sectarian strife and violence.
December 12, 2006
At least eight children have died and seven women have had miscarriages in the town of al-Sinya which invading U.S. troops have put under siege for more than 50 days. Sinya is close to Baiji, one of the scores of anti-U.S. strongholds in the country. The town's nearly 50,000 inhabitants are now without running water and food supplies are running dangerously low.
But the occupiers seem to be determined to proceed with their mass punishment and are turning away aid convoys. Pregnant women are denied access to the maternity hospital in Baiji and many others now risk miscarriage.
December 23, 2006
Three female students from the University of Mustansiriya were kidnapped, raped, and killed, and their mutilated bodies passed to the Baghdad morgue. The horrendous crime has shocked many in Baghdad and unleashed yet another wave of terror in the violence-torn city home to a quarter of Iraq's population.
"This is a fresh horrifying indication that the level of crime and violence is taking unprecedented proportions in Iraq," the group said in a statement.
December 3, 2006
A new opinion poll suggests that more than half of Iraqis know of the existence of illegal drugs and how to get them. Eighty-one per cent said it was not that difficult to buy the drugs while only 18 per cent said they had no idea of their existence.
Most worrying for the researcher has been the high use of illegal drugs among the 15-20 age groups. He said 46 per cent of the youngsters in this group said they were using drugs regularly while the use declines drastically among older groups.
Of the 109 males in the survey, 92 per cent said they bought various drugs and hallucination pills while only 2 per cent of the 97 females in the study said they were using them. The results of the poll, despite its small number of respondents, is evidence of the surge in the use of drugs in a country, which before the 2003 U.S. invasion had the lowest number of drug users in the Middle East.
These reports reveal the lawlessness and chaos that the U.S. occupation has produced in Iraq. Such disastrous results can only be called a failure, by any measure – unless, of course, the creation of widespread instability and misery is the intention of the occupying powers. While this may sound incredible, the evidence suggests this is actually the case.
With overwhelming majorities in Iraq and the United States demanding an end to the U.S.-led occupation, why are our elected officials considering sending more troops? The only people who support sending more troops are hard-core Zionists, like Frederick Kagan, one of the Israel-first planners who pushed hard for war against Iraq. Fred is, along with his father, Donald, and brother, Robert, among the signers of the Project for the New American Century document from 2000, which specifically called for U.S. aggression against Iraq.
"Removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power," Robert Kagan and other Neo-Cons wrote to President Clinton in January 1998, "…needs to become the aim of American foreign policy." Robert's brother, Fred, is now telling the president to send more troops to the Iraq quagmire: "We need a long-lasting surge because we have to keep in mind that we face an enemy here that adapts to our strategy," Kagan, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute says. "If we do a short surge they will just wait us out. We need to surge for at least 18 months."
The neoconservatives have always considered a stable and functioning Iraq a threat to their design for the Middle East, Professor Abbas J. Ali of IndianaUniversity, wrote in his recent article "Targeting Sadrists, Targeting Iraq."
Michael Ledeen, a Neo-Con strategist, says that instability in the Middle East is the preferred political state because it facilitates U.S. control of the region. "Stability is an unworthy American mission and a misleading concept to boot," Ledeen says. "The real issue is not whether, but how to destabilize."
After three years of U.S.-led occupation, life for the Iraqi people has become extremely unstable, miserable, and hopeless. Iraqis are deserting the country in droves. Has the widespread misery in Iraq been created by design – Zionist design – as Ledeen's comment suggests?
When we consider that Ledeen's 28-year-old daughter, Simone, went to Iraq in the fall of 2003 as adviser to the occupation government's Ministry of Finance in Baghdad, and played a key role in establishing the regime of quislings, the answer seems obvious. "In short order," the Washington Post reported, "six of the new young hires [including Ledeen] found themselves managing the country's $13 billion budget, making decisions affecting millions of Iraqis."
A recent article in Azzaman (December 13, 2006), confirms the suspicion that much of the chaos and carnage is being carried out by foreign secret services and their agents – not Iraqis:
There is a deep fear among the leaders of the Sadrist Movement in parliament that their followers are being targeted. They believe that the call for a surge in foreign troops in Baghdad goes beyond intimidation. Foreign troops, they argue, will not direct its power against terrorists. Their fears have been reinforced since government security experts discovered that the bombs in Sadr City on November 23 and the one that followed two weeks later in al-Tayrin Circle in central Baghdad, which slaughtered Sadrist supporters, were made of highly sophisticated materials that neither foreign terrorists nor Iraqi groups have access to nor the skills to assemble them.
The evidence indicates that much of the bombing and bloodshed in occupied Iraq is actually being done by foreign secret services. Two British agents, for example, disguised as Shiite militiamen, were captured in Basra in the fall of 2005 with a car full of explosives and detonators after they had driven by and fired on a crowd of protestors. Caught by Iraqi police, the British army took extreme measures and bulldozed the prison to obtain the release of the fake Shiite terrorists before they could be interrogated and charged with crimes of terrorism.
Stage-managing the calamitous occupation of Iraq are high-level Zionist agents with close ties to Israel. These senior agents, with clear ties to the state of Israel, have played key roles in guiding (or misguiding) the U.S.-led war and occupation in Iraq from the beginning. Israel, it should be noted, has been in a state of war with Iraq since the Zionist state was established in 1948. For the United States to knowingly employ hostile and enemy Israeli agents in the planning and setting up the military occupation in Iraq indicates that the occupation is, in fact, Zionist-designed.
In that case, the motivation for creating widespread chaos and bloodshed is quite clear – it is simply part of the Zionist agenda to destabilize and partition Iraq while seizing its strategic assets and resources through theft and privatization schemes.
While there are certainly scores of un-named Zionist agents involved in the aggression and occupation of Iraq, Americans like Simone Ledeen with documented ties to Israel held high-level positions during the setting up of the occupation authority. Understanding their ties to the state of Israel explains why the occupation has been an unmitigated disaster for the Iraqi nation and its people.
During the initial phase of the Iraq war, until May 1, 2003, Dan Senor was the 31-year-old Director of the CoalitionInformationCenter at CENTCOM HQ in Qatar. Senor later served as Senior Advisor to L. Paul Bremer III, Administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), whom he advised on a variety of policy and communications issues. Senor, certainly one of Israel's most highly placed agents during the war, went to Baghdad in mid-April 2003 where he remained as a high-level CPA authority through June 2004, when Bremer quickly and secretly fled the country.
While Senor's biography on the White House website reveals that he obtained a degree at the University of Western Ontario and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, it says nothing about his parents. This was a prudent decision to conceal the Senor family ties to Israel. Dan is the son of Helen and the late James M. Senor, who was raised in Cleveland.
The Czechoslovakian-born Helen Senor lives in Toronto where she worked for 26 years as the secretary to the Israeli consul general. "For 26 years, I felt like I lived in Israel five days a week. I'm surrounded by Israelis and the Hebrew language, and all the concerns are about Israel," she said.

She told the Jewish press that she and her late husband were ardent Zionists. She has two children and two step-children, two of whom live in Israel. James was national director of Canadian Society for the Weizmann Institute of Science.
James previously worked at the Jewish Agency in Israel, the central organ of the global Zionist network. Prior to moving to Jerusalem, during the 1950s and 60s, the senior Senor was the director of the Jewish Community Center in Utica, New York.
Dan Senor, at age 22, was an intern at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Israeli lobby in Washington. His sister, Wendy Senor Singer, heads AIPAC's office in Jerusalem, and his brother-in-law, Saul Singer, is a right-wing editor of the Jerusalem Post. Prior to going to Iraq, Senor worked for the Carlyle Group from 2001 to 2003. The Carlyle Group, one of the world's largest private equity firms, is closely linked with the Bush family. Senor was also a director of the US-Israel Business Exchange.   Senor was clearly a well positioned Zionist agent prepared to manage the occupation and the hostile takeover of assets of Iraq, but he wasn't alone.
The hostile takeover of Iraq's strategic assets was clearly the Zionist plan from the beginning. The plan was to acquire the wealth of Iraq by managing the privatization of Iraqi factories and resources. The agents for this scheme were carefully chosen by the Bush administration.
L. Paul Bremer, the former managing director of Kissinger Associates, was named Director of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance for post-war Iraq on May 6, 2003. Bremer had served as Kissinger's executive assistant at the State Dept. in the 1970's. Prior to his mission in Iraq, Bremer was the Chairman and CEO of Marsh Crisis Consulting, a risk and insurance services firm and a subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan. As head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, Bremer exercised complete authority over Iraq's civil administration. He served in this capacity from May 11, 2003 until a puppet government was installed on June 28, 2004.
The "dismal performance" of the CPA to improve the quality of life for Iraqis under its occupation was the result of a "toxic mix of ideological obsession and cronyism," according to Paul Krugman of the New York Times. "The insurgency took root during the occupation's first few months, when the Coalition Provisional Authority seemed oddly disengaged from the problems of postwar anarchy. But what was Paul Bremer III, the head of the C.P.A., focused on?" Krugman asked.
"According to a Washington Post reporter who shared a flight with him last June, 'Bremer discussed the need to privatize government-run factories with such fervor that his voice cut through the din of the cargo hold,'" Krugman wrote in July 2004. Bush appointed his friend and political supporter, Thomas C. Foley, as director of "Private Sector Development" in occupied Iraq in August 2003, putting him in charge of 200 Iraqi state-owned businesses, which were slated to be privatized. Michael P. Fleischer, the brother of White House spokesman and communications director, Ari Fleischer, was made Foley's deputy director.  
On March 13, 2004, Michael Fleischer became director and took charge of the effort to privatize the seized assets of the Iraqi state. The Zionist-controlled press did not think the blatant cronyism and nepotism of the Bush White House was a subject worthy of discussion. There is only one mainstream newspaper article that even mentions Fleischer, Iraq, and the words "privatize" or "privatization."

Fleischer is described as "a New Jersey businessman," who took a leave of absence from Bogen Communications International, Inc., where he has been president and a member of the Board of Directors since 1997.
"Mr. Fleischer’s success as an entrepreneur, manager, and business leader in the international business community will be of enormous value to the CPA and to Iraq," the C.P.A.'s press release said about his promotion. Fleischer and Bremer did not bring value to Iraq, rather they took value from Iraq. That was their assignment.   During the entire period of the CPA, for example, there was no metering of Iraqi oil production, Iraq's most valuable export.
But who was Michael Fleischer really working for in Iraq? The evidence is clear that Fleischer has long been a paid agent of the state of Israel and an employee of Israeli military intelligence. Bogen, originally an American-owned electronics company, has been an asset of Israeli military intelligence since 1995. Fleischer was made president of Bogen in 1997, when the Israeli owners shifted seats. Bogen is actually owned and run by a handful of Israeli agents, closely tied to the Israeli Air Force.
The people who hired and paid Michael Fleischer are former Israeli fighter pilots, Yoav Stern and Zivi R. Nedivi. These Israelis have been involved in a string of electronic, aviation, and avionics companies since they came to the United States in the 1990s. They are both former directors and officers of Rada, the "mother ship" company based in Israel. Rada ( is run by senior officers of the Israeli air force. The president and CEO of Rada, for example, is General (Res.) Herzle Bodinger. Bodinger served in the Israeli air force for 35 years and was commander of the force from January 1992 to July 1996. All the Rada's senior executives have similar Israeli air force backgrounds. 
These Israeli air force officers are the Zionist handlers who controlled Michael Fleischer, before, during, and after his stint in Iraq. "The only paradigm they know is cronyism," Fleischer, said about the Iraqis. He should know.

Who Put Thermate in the World Trade Center?

January 18, 2007
When a former worker from the World Trade Center came forward recently with crucial and verifiable information about what was really on the 81st floor of the South Tower (WTC 2), he broke up a logjam of unanswered questions about the source of the molten metal seen falling from the tower before its collapse on 9-11.
Based on this important piece of information from a former IT professional who worked with computers in the Twin Towers, I was able to determine that the two airplanes that struck the twin towers of the World Trade Center on 9-11 had directly impacted secure computer rooms in both buildings: the first on the 95th floor of the North Tower; the second on the 81st floor of the South Tower.
This information raises new questions: Were the computer rooms equipped to play a role in the crime? Were there homing devices or computers in these rooms that used precision-guidance systems to direct the planes into the towers? Did these computer rooms contain pre-placed explosives or forms of Thermite to destroy evidence, create an incendiary spectacle, and weaken the structure prior to the collapses?
Photographic evidence strongly suggests that the secure computer rooms in both towers contained forms of Thermite, which had been pre-placed to destroy evidence and facilitate the collapse of the immense steel-frame towers while creating a deadly pyrotechnic spectacle. After examining the photographic and physical evidence, Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University has concluded that the yellow and white glowing metal pouring from the east corner of the 81st floor of the South Tower was probably molten iron created by a Thermite reaction.
It could not have been molten aluminum as the federal government's Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers (NIST, 2005) speculates, Jones says, because, among other things, molten aluminum would appear silver-grey in daylight conditions. Having tested pieces of hardened molten metal from the twin towers, Jones found that they were composed primarily of iron, not structural steel. This is positive physical evidence of an aluminothermic reaction, more commonly known as Thermite, having occurred in conjunction with the collapse of the twin towers and WTC 7.
Aluminothermics refers to the intense exothermic (heat producing) reactions that occur when powdered aluminum reacts with powdered iron oxide and/or other elements and oxides. Copper, potassium permanganate, zinc- and barium nitrate are among the additives Jones has found evidence of in the dust from the World Trade Center. The Thermite reaction produces an extremely hot reaction (up to 2500 °C or 4500 °F), which creates molten iron and aluminum oxide. The molten iron produced from Thermite is white hot and the aluminum oxide is a white smoke.

Thermate is a variant of Thermite that contains additives to enhance certain effects. It may contain pyrotechnic additives, such as barium nitrate, for incendiary purposes. The addition of barium nitrate increases its thermal effect, creates flame in burning and significantly reduces the ignition temperature.

The addition of 2 percent sulfur to Thermite improves the steel-cutting properties by creating a eutectic that will melt steel at much lower temperatures. Eutectic comes from the Greek word "eutektos," which means "easily melted." Thermate cuts through steel like "a warm knife through butter," Jones says.

The FEMA-sponsored Building Performance Study of 2002 contains evidence of melted steel caused by sulfidation and oxidation. This is found in the "Limited Metallurgical Examination" written by Professor Jonathan Barnett. The NIST report, however, fails to address the evidence of sulfidation found in the structural steel from the WTC. Barnett examined two pieces of melted steel: one from the WTC 7, the other from the TwinTowers. About the first piece, Barnett wrote: "The thinning of the steel occurred by a high-temperature corrosion due to the combination of oxidation and sulfidation." This was done by "a eutectic mixture of iron, oxygen, and sulfur that liquefied the steel," he concluded.

Barnett found the same sulfidation in the piece of melted steel from the Twin Towers. "The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event," Barnett wrote. "No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified." Professor Jones points to Thermate, with 2 percent sulfur, as being the most likely culprit. The oxidation and sulfidation of the steel requires the oxygen and sulfur being "intimately in contact with the metal at high temperature," Jones said.
The molten iron seen falling from the South Tower's eastern corner before it collapsed must have weighed many tons. One cubic meter of iron weighs about 8.5 tons and it certainly looks like several cubic meters poured from the 81st floor shortly before it collapsed. But what could have been the source of so much iron on the 81st floor?
The NIST report gives no answers to this crucial question. In this respect, the NIST report is a good example of studied ignorance. Not only does NIST fail to provide any information about what was on the crucial floors of the South Tower (79, 81, and 82), but they actually suggest that these floors contained normal office materials.
"There were vigorous fires on the east side of the 80th through 83rd floors, especially on the northeast end of the 81st and 82nd floors, where the aircraft had bulldozed the office desks and chairs and added its own combustibles," the NIST report says in its "Account of WTC 2."
From the NIST report the reader gets the impression that these were normal office floors with "desks and chairs," although that was definitely not the case with the 81st floor while the contents of the 82nd and 79th floors remain unknown. Fuji Bank was the tenant of floors 79-82, yet for some reason the NIST researchers were unable or unwilling to provide any description of the contents of these crucial floors – four years after 9-11.
A former Japanese bank employee recently came forward and explained that the 81st floor was an entire floor of server-size computer batteries: Fuji Bank had reinforced the 81st floor, he said, so the floor could support more weight. The entire floor was then filled with server-size Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) batteries.
These units were bolted to a raised floor about 3 feet above the reinforced 81st floor. "The whole floor was batteries," he said, "huge battery-looking things." They were "all black" and "solid, very heavy" things that had been brought in during the night. They had been put in place during the summer prior to 9-11, he said.
But were they really batteries or were they Thermate? "It's weird," he said. "They were never turned on."
Were these batteries the source of the molten iron seen falling from the 81st floor? Was Thermate in these "batteries"? Is there evidence to prove Thermate was used on the 81st floor?
Before addressing these questions, allow me to explain how Thermate may have been used in the crash zones:
The perverse terrorist team that planned the destruction of the Twin Towers apparently used Hollywood expertise to create an incendiary spectacle. They employed remote control devices and precision guidance systems to fly the planes into the towers at precisely the points where they had pre-placed explosives and Thermate incendiary bombs.
Immediately before the planes, or specially prepared drones, hit the towers, missiles carried beneath the fuselage were fired into the buildings. These missiles, which contained depleted uranium (DU), caused the white flashes seen before the planes hit the towers. This white flash is evidence of a pyrophoric white-hot uranium penetrator, which bores through everything it hits and creates a super-heated space as it burns at extremely hot temperatures.   Asked if a white-hot DU penetrator would set off Thermate, Jones said, "Definitely."
The DU penetrator would carry on through the tower unless it were stopped by a core column or some other extremely dense object. In fact, a white-hot burning object with the characteristics of a DU penetrator is clearly seen coming out ahead of the fireball that engulfed the SouthTower. If DU missiles were used, they would have created a super-heated space in which any combustible, such as atomized jet fuel, explosives, or Thermate, would ignite immediately.
While the orange and black fireballs caused by the burning jet fuel are easily recognized in photographs, there is visible evidence of Thermate seen in the dust and smoke – the conspicuous white smoke of aluminum oxide.
Photo below: the fireball at the entrance (on the left side of the photo) is grayish, and at the exit (on the right side) is full of soot. This is evidence that the fireball at the left has a lot more thermite and/or other explosives in it, while the fireball as the exit is full of jet fuel. The white streams along the side of the building might be from packages of thermite that are burning as they fall.
On the 95th floor of WTC 1, Marsh & McLennan had a "large walled data center," a secure computer room along the north and east sides of the tower. And that's exactly where the plane hit – the north wall of the 95th floor.
The plane struck the North Tower right in the middle of the north face. The nose of the plane struck the 130th perimeter column at the 96th floor slab and something, perhaps the nose landing gear, carried on right through the middle of the building and severed three columns on the south side of the tower.
An image caught on video immediately after the plane struck the tower shows a huge fireball engulfing the north face of the building where the plane hit. But from the east side of the tower a suspicious huge white dust cloud is emerging that looks like an exploding bale of cotton. It is pure white and shows no signs of burning jet fuel. This white dust is emerging from the east wall of the tower, from the level and side occupied by the computer room.
An explosion of white smoke accompanied the impact of the first plane.
Professor Jones, when shown this photo, said, "It looks very much like aluminum oxide dust." The white smoke is clearly coming out of the east side of the building and is also seen behind the orange and sooty cloud that is rising on the north side of the tower. It is very clear that two very different materials are exploding in the crash area: jet fuel and perhaps some form of Thermate, which is producing the telltale white smoke.
The NIST report does not mention the white smoke or dust seen coming out of the NorthTower and attributes these clouds to 10,000 gallons of burning fuel mixed with dust:
Atomized jet fuel is highly flammable (similar to kerosene), so both the hot debris and the numerous pieces of electrical and electronic gear in the offices were more than sufficient as ignition sources. A surge of combusting fuel rapidly filled the floors, mixing with dust from the pulverized walls and floor slabs.
The pressure created by the heated gases forced the ignited mist out the entrance gash and blown-out windows on the east and south sides of the tower. The resulting fireballs could be seen for miles, precipitating many 911 calls.
Isn't it odd that the explosion, which was supposedly caused by jet fuel combusting in the middle of the building, did not affect the western façade as it had the eastern? Why did the east side of the building react so differently from the west side? And why is the smoke coming from the east side such a bright white and completely lacking any of the characteristics of burning jet fuel?
Is this where Thermate incendiary devices had been placed – in the computer room of Marsh & McLennan? If Thermate bombs had been pre-placed in the 95th floor computer room, who put them there? Certainly Marsh & McLennan must know or have records of who had access to that room and what was in it. This information needs to be revealed.
Photo below: The North Tower before the South Tower has been hit by a plane. Notice the stream of white smoke coming from one side of the NorthTower, but the rest of the smoke is black.
These images can be found at:

The bright orange and black fireballs that erupted from the South Tower are indelibly seared in the memory of the modern world. But here again, there was a conspicuous white cloud that is not easily explained by the burning jet fuel.
The explosions coming from the point of entry and the east wall have the characterisics of Thermate. Note the white smoke and bright orange flame; this is not from burning jet fuel.
Again, the NIST report points only to burning jet fuel:
Within about one half of a second, dust and debris flew out of windows on the east and north faces. Several small fireballs of atomized jet fuel burst from windows on the east face of the 81st and 82nd floors, coalescing into a single, large fireball that spanned the entire face. A tenth of a second later, fire appeared in the dust clouds ejected from the south face of the 79th, 81st, and 82nd floors.
The plane passed from left to right. The explosion coming from the point of entry is unusually strong and exhibits the artificial orange flame and white smoke of Thermate with barium nitrate.
"The fireballs burned for 10 seconds, extending almost 200 feet out from the north, east, and south faces," NIST reports. "Having consumed the aerosol fuel, the flames then receded." From the south face of WTC 2, the "dust clouds" that emerged look nothing like combusting jet fuel. They look much more like the white smoke of Thermate than burning kerosene.

The massive aircraft and its estimated 9,100 gallons of fuel hit the south face of the South Tower at 540 mph and carried on through the east and north sides. But what is exploding out of the south side of the tower a fraction of a second later? The huge whitish cloud of dust that comes from the south face has orange flame within it but has none of the dark orange and black colors seen in the jet fuel fireballs that emerged from the north and east sides of the tower. This white dust lacks any visible evidence of burning kerosene but was expelled from the tower at least 250 feet. What was the force pushing it out if no jet fuel is seen in it or behind it?

As one looks up at the three fireballs emerging from the explosion that occurred at the crash level of the SouthTower, it is clear to see, from the color of the flame and soot, that the jet fuel is primarily in the front of the fireball. The further one looks to the rear, toward the point of entry, the less evidence one sees of burning kerosene.

When the SouthTower begins to collapse, huge amounts of white smoke are pushed from the tower. Furthermore, prior to every documented flow of molten metal, NIST observed puffs of dust. The photographic and physical evidence proves that Thermate was used in the destruction of the towers and strongly suggests that it had been pre-placed on the floors that the planes hit.
If Arab terrorists did not pre-position Thermate in the secure computer rooms and throughout the TwinTowers and WTC 7, who did? Finding what was on these crucial floors and who had access to these floors and secure computer rooms will help identify the real culprits of 9-11.
Photo below: The plane entered the SouthTower from this side of this building. There is not much soot in a fireball at the entrance hole.
Photo below: This shows the exit hole where some plane parts flew out. This fireball looks more like a sooty, hydrocarbon fire.
Photo below: The South Tower. The plane entered at the left, and exited at the right. A stream of white smoke is mixing with the black smoke. What could create that white smoke?

Is this Thermate Exploding at the North Tower?

January 25, 2007 

The mysterious explosive white burst coming from the NorthTower is strongly indicative of Thermate bombs having been placed in the secure computer area where the first plane crashed. But there is more evidence of Thermite in photos of the stricken NorthTower.
Marsh & McLennan and the Greenberg Family
Marsh & McLennan, the insurance and risk brokerage company headed by Jeffrey W. Greenberg since 2000, was hit hard by the plane that struck the NorthTower of the WorldTradeCenter on 9-11. A reported 295 employees of the firm were killed that day.
Greenberg is a son of Maurice R. "Hank" Greenberg, former chairman and CEO of AIG, and Director Emeritus and Honorary Vice Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Greenberg resigned as CEO of Marsh & McLennan in 2004 after the firm was charged with rigging, and as part of a lucrative kick-back scheme, "stifling competition," according to then N.Y. Attorney General Eliot Spitzer.
Maurice Greenberg was also indictable on a raft of charges until Spitzer said that there would be no prosecution of the charges against the patriarch of the Greenberg family. Spitzer went on to become the governor of New York.
Computer Room Hit on 9-11
On 9-11, Marsh & McLennan had a "large walled data center," a secure computer room along the north and east sides of the 95th floor of WTC 1, the NorthTower. And that's exactly where the plane hit. The plane struck the NorthTower right in the middle of the north face. The nose of the plane struck the 130th perimeter column at the 96th floor slab and something, perhaps the nose landing gear, carried on right through the middle of the building and severed three columns on the south side of the tower.
White Dust of Thermate?
An image caught on video immediately after the plane struck the tower shows a huge fireball engulfing the north face of the building where the plane hit. What is odd about this explosion is that there is little sign of burning jet fuel to be seen. We have an energetic explosion accompanied by an abundance of whitish oxides and light orange flame. Is this a form of Thermate going off - perhaps with barium nitrate added for flame effect?
But from the east side of the tower a suspicious huge white dust cloud is emerging that looks like an exploding bale of cotton. It is pure white and shows no signs of burning jet fuel. This white dust is emerging from the east wall of the tower, from the level and side occupied by the computer room.
About thirty seconds later, another Thermate-like reaction appears to go off near the east corner of WTC 1, sending a very visible fragment of burning Thermate flying. (See next posted article.)
Professor Jones, when shown this photo, said, "It looks very much like aluminum oxide dust." The white smoke is clearly coming out of the east side of the building and is also seen behind the orange and sooty cloud that is rising on the north side of the tower.
It is very clear that two very different materials are exploding in the crash area: jet fuel and some form of Thermate, which is producing the telltale white smoke. Burning jet fuel has distinctive characteristics - as does burning Thermate.
The NIST report does not mention the white smoke or dust seen coming out of the NorthTower and attributes these clouds to 10,000 gallons of burning fuel mixed with dust:
Atomized jet fuel is highly flammable (similar to kerosene), so both the hot debris and the numerous pieces of electrical and electronic gear in the offices were more than sufficient as ignition sources.

A surge of combusting fuel rapidly filled the floors, mixing with dust from the pulverized walls and floor slabs.
The pressure created by the heated gases forced the ignited mist out the entrance gash and blown-out windows on the east and south sides of the tower.
The resulting fireballs could be seen for miles, precipitating many 911 calls.
Isn't it odd that the explosion, which was supposedly caused by jet fuel combusting in the middle of the building, did not affect the western facade as it had the eastern?
Why did the east side of the building react so differently from the west side? And why is the smoke coming from the east side such a bright white and completely lacking any of the characteristics of burning jet fuel?
Is this where Thermate incendiary devices had been placed -- in the computer room of Marsh & McLennan? If Thermate bombs had been pre-placed in the 95th floor computer room, who put them there?
Certainly Marsh & McLennan must know or have records of who had access to that room and what was in it. This information needs to be revealed. What does Jeffrey Greenberg know about what happened in the 95th floor computer room?
Thermate Fragment Shooting from the NorthTower?
The Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers, produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a branch of the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, has a great deal of interesting information and photos tucked into a neat package of some 20,000 pages.
On page 21 of the hard copy of the final report there is a photograph (seen below), taken from a video taken by John F. Davis, that shows a remarkable and unexplained event that occurred seconds after the first plane hit the North Tower.
As the previous article discusses there is some evidence to suggest that Thermate had been pre-positioned on the 81st floor of the SouthTower and 95th floor of the NorthTower. These are two of the floors that were directly impacted by the main body of each aircraft.
Large exploding white clouds were seen coming from these floors, which suggests that Thermate bomb packets may have been going off immediately after impact. Mixed with barium nitrate, the Thermate would have produced white smoke and orange flame along with molten iron as end products. Part of the reason for pre-placing Thermate on these floors would have been to produce spectacular fireballs that would destroy most of the evidence and ignite the jet fuel that was suspended in air. It would also severely weaken the structure at that level, cutting many of the columns.
The following photograph shows the north face of the NorthTower, about 30 seconds after impact. The north face actually faced northeast.
From the east corner of what appears to be the 95th floor, which is where the huge white cloud had previously emerged, we see a brilliant white flaming reaction occurring just a few feet from the east corner of the tower.
Falling and spiraling from this brilliant "event" is a small object leaving a bright white trail of oxides. This has the characteristics of burning Thermate. The shadow on the north face suggests that this object is not falling straight down but that it is coming toward the camera slightly as it seems to have some propulsion coming from the burning material.
This is odd for many reasons. One is that this reaction seems to be occurring outside the building, but very close to it. The NIST report does not mention that any of the perimeter columns on the east face were severed, so what is burning at the east corner and how was it suspended in air?
This is a mystery object that needs to be explained. Information, suggestions and ideas are welcome. 

Terror Mastermind KSM is an Imposter - The Confession is Fake

March 16, 2007

The U.S. government claims this man is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9-11 and other terror atrocities.

The person who is said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) clearly does not appear to be the person who masterminded the attacks of 911. It does not appear that he has ever masterminded anything. He seems to be an imposter, a feeble-minded "fall guy," who has been tortured and whose mind has been manipulated in order to make these incredible claims.


It was reported on March 1, 2003, that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed had been captured during a raid on an apartment in Rawalpindi, the sister city of the Pakistani capital, Islamabad:
"According to the local media, Khalid was seized while in the house of one Ahmed Abdul Qudoos, who, it turns out, is a mentally feeble person - he is also being held in custody as an al-Qaeda member - and as such receives a regular stipend from a United Nations organization,"
- Pakistani journalist Syed Saleem Shahzad, early March 2003. 
Source: Khalid: "A test for US credibility," Syed Saleem Shahzad, March 6, 2003
This was reported in the Pakistani and Indian press, which carried photos of the feeble-minded Ahmed Abdul Qudoos. Note the heavy-set frame, the nearly closed eyes, and the grey sideburn in front of Qudoos right ear.
Ahmed Abdul Qadus (centre) is brought to an anti-terrorist court in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, on Saturday. Qadus, an activist of the Jamat-e-Islami, was arrested earlier this month with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, suspected mastermind of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks in the USA. — AP/PTI
Now compare that person's face with that of the alleged terror mastermind, KSM:
The person said to be KSM and Ahmed Abdul Qadus
Again you will see that the suspect called KSM has the grey sideburns, heavy frame, and lazy eyes of Qudoos. So. The confessed terror mastermind is actually Ahmed Abdul Qadus. The real KSM was killed on September 11, 2002, as was reported in the Pakistani press at the time.
By comparison, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed before his arrest appeared intelligent.
The real KSM appeared wide-eyed and intelligent.


The first indication that this is not the real KSM, and that we are talking about two different people is the fact that the person making the confession in the secret military tribunal in Cuba can barely speak English. The real KSM, on the other hand, was educated in the United States and had obtained a degree in mechanical engineering from an American university in 1986.
The really poor English found in the recent confession does not fit with a U.S.-educated engineer.
The real KSM was fluent in Arabic, English and Urdu:

The real KSM attended ChowanCollege, a small Baptist school in Murfreesboro, North Carolina, for at least one semester in 1983, according to Sarah Ward, spokesperson for the college. KSM then transferred to North Carolina Agricultural and TechnicalStateUniversity and completed a degree in mechanical engineering in 1986. This was confirmed by Nettie Rowland of the university office.
The real KSM was a person who had traveled and worked across Asia and had lived in many foreign countries, from the United States to the Philippines to Bosnia. The real KSM would have simply had to have had a much greater command of the English language than what we see in the 26-page transcript of the recent confession.


Syed Saleem Shahzad, a senior political correspondent with the Dawn Group of newspapers in Karachi, Pakistan, reported in October 2002 that "Khalid Shaikh Mohammed" had been killed in a raid carried out by the FBI and ISI in Karachi on September 11, 2002:
Now it has emerged that Kuwaiti national Khalid Shaikh Mohammed did indeed perish in the raid, but his wife and child were taken from the apartment and handed over to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), in whose hands they remain," Shahzad reported on 30 October 2002.
Initially, the joint ISI-FBI plan was to take Shaikh Mohammed alive so that he could be grilled, especially as he was believed to have knowledge of other al-Qaeda cells in Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen and elsewhere. However, as a plain clothed officer climbed the stairs toward the third-floor apartment, a hand grenade was thrown, and he retreated. Reinforcements then arrived, and for the next few hours a fierce gun battle blazed.

The FBI, still keen to take Shaikh Mohammed alive, tear gassed the area, and a number of people were captured. However, despite instructions to the contrary, a few Pakistan Rangers entered the flat, where they found Shaikh Mohammed and another man, allegedly with their hands up. The Rangers nevertheless opened fire on the pair.

Later, the Pakistani press carried pictures of a message scrawled in blood on the wall of the flat, proclaiming the Muslim refrain of Kalma, in Arabic: "There is no God except Allah, Mohammed is his messenger"). An official who was present in the flat at the time of the shooting has told Asia Times Online that the message was written by Shaikh Mohammed with his own blood as his life drained from him.

On March 6, 2003, Shahzad wrote again about the mystery surrounding whether KSM was alive or dead in an article entitled "Khalid: A test for US credibility."

The following is a reconstruction of events that were widely reported in the Pakistani print and electronic media, and information gathered from intelligence sources.
The building stands alone, with no access to the ones next door. Initially, a few plain clothed officials (including a major of the ISI and a civilian inspector) entered the building and urged the people inside to evacuate. A grenade was then thrown, which injured the major and the inspector, forcing them to retreat.

Fresh troops then entered the building, and a fierce gun battle broke out. At this point, according to an eyewitness, a car carrying a few "white people" was seen speeding away from the scene. Tear gas was then fired into the building, and the shooting subsided.

Pakistan Rangers along with many plain clothed officials and police surged into the building and fired at two men in one of the flats, who were standing with their hands up. One of these turned out to be Ramzi Binalshibh, who had wanted to join the 19 hijackers for the attacks on the US but who had been unable to get a US visa. He was taken into custody.

Nine other suspected terrorists were captured, and two were killed. A woman FBI official examined the bodies, and, as reported by an ISI official, suddenly exclaimed, "You have killed Khalid Shaikh Mohammad." The woman then instructed that a finger be cut off the body, which she took away, presumably for a DNA test.

Khalid's wife and child were taken away to an ISI safe house in the vicinity where they were interrogated by the FBI, and it is said that the woman identified one of the bodies as Khalid. Several weeks after this incident, the then interior minister, Moinuddin Haider, stated in the country's largest Urdu-language newspaper that Khalid's widow had been handed over to Egyptian authorities.

Apparently, neither of the bodies was buried, a departure from usual custom, and they were kept in a private mortuary operated by the Edhi Home, a charity organization. After several weeks, some women, said to be widows and mothers of those killed in Kashmir and Afghanistan, launched a protest in front of the mortuary for the bodies to be handed over.

Again, according to Pakistan print media reports, these protest turned into big demonstrations which forced the authorities to issue a statement that the bodies had been buried in a local, unidentified, graveyard.

ISI officials close to the case at this time were convinced, as were the FBI, that Khalid had been killed. But they chose not to disclose the death as they wanted other al-Qaeda members to attempt to remain in contact with him through the recovered satellite telephones, mobile phones and laptop computers.

Is Ahmed Abdul Qudoos being used as the imposter for the dead KSM? Is this all a big deception to use a feeble-minded person as the scapegoat for all of the false flag terror attacks of the past 14 years? If it is, and it certainly appears to be, it is about as low as a government can possibly go.

Unless the person who is claiming to be the terror mastermind of 911 is brought to the United States and put on trial in which all the evidence is presented, there is nothing to convince us that there is any truth in these incredible claims coming from a super-secret tribunal held behind the closed doors of Camp Delta in Quantanamo, Cuba.


William Doyle, who lost his son on 9-11, heads a relatives' group called the Coalition of 9-11 Families. Asked about the recent confession to the super-secret military tribunal in Cuba, Doyle said it was "sickening."

"This is a complete new low," Doyle said. "The administration is using him as a fall guy for the continuing cover-up of the U.S. government."

"He should be brought to the United States to face trial," Doyle said. "He is not the only one involved."

"Who financed him?" Doyle asked. Doyle noted that the government has classified 28 pages from the bi-partisan investigation into 9-11 from 2002. "The administration has information about where he got the money," Doyle said. "Our government knows. Why aren't these people being questioned?"

"At least there was a trial in Germany where all the evidence was presented," he said, referring to the Hamburg trial of terror suspect Mounir el Motassadeq.

This Ahmed Abdul Qadus is the person who is being presented to the world as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. This is an imposter and the confession is a fraud - and the military and government know it.

Was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Captured?

March 16, 2007

Ahmed Abdul Qadus, the man arrested in a raid which supposedly led to the capture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, was held in solitary confinement for 25 days and then released from jail in Pakistan.
Note:  The complete article is no longer found.  This is the text of the article that I was able to find in the Web archives:

Qudoos released from jail

By Our Reporter

RAWALPINDI, March 26: The Adiala Jail authorities on Wednesday released Aqeel Ahmed Abdul Qudoos, the alleged harbourer of Al Qaeda activist, Khalid Shaikh Mohammad.

"He (Qudoos) was released at 6:30pm. But he would not come to his Westridge residence as he had moved to some undisclosed place," Qudoos' sister, Qudsia, told Dawn. However, she refused to reveal names of the persons who had given surety in the court. "They have helped our family in the name of God and we will not disclose their names in order to save them from any complication," she said.

Responding to a query Ms Qudsia confirmed that there were no other charges against Qudoos except those which had been levelled by Westridge police.

The additional district and sessions judge, Syed Pervez Ali Shah, had accepted the bail plea of the accused on Tuesday.

The court had also set aside the decision of a judicial magistrate, Mohammad Iqbal Guraya, who had rejected the bail plea of the accused on March 19.


Photo: Ahmed Abdul Qadus, the man at whose home Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was said to have been arrested, was reportedly reunited with his family after 25 days in solitary confinement on March 26, 2003.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the alleged al-Qaeda financier Mustafa al-Hisawai were reportedly arrested at the home of Qadus in Rawalpindi on March 1, 2003, in a joint operation between the FBI and Pakistani authorities.
The family of Qadus, who is described as "feeble minded," insisted he is innocent and claim the al-Qaeda men were never at the house.
An AP story reported on the family's claims the following:
On Sunday, Qadus' family vehemently denied he was involved in terrorism and insisted he was alone at home with his wife and children when authorities burst in around 3 a.m. Saturday.
They said about 25 heavily armed agents, some in civilian clothes and some in blue uniforms, stormed into the house, rifling through drawers and pointing their guns at the children. They quickly took Qadus away and kept his wife and children under guard in a small bedroom as they searched the house, Qadus' sister, Qudsia Khanum, said.
Agents, all of whom appeared to be Pakistani, took a computer hard-drive, documents and U.S. dollars from the house, the family and security officials said. Khanum said the computer had no Internet hookup and that her brother didn't even know how to use it.
"He is slow, and he is so innocent and friendly, it is inconceivable that he could be involved in intrigue. People run rings around him because it would never occur to him that they might lie or take advantage of him," she said from the family's living room in an upscale neighborhood of the city.
Qadus' father, Abdul Qadus, is a prominent microbiologist who worked in Africa for the World Health Organization for many years before retiring, Khanum said. The 42-year-old Qadus, however, could not hold down a job and had lived at home with his parents his entire life, she said.
Qadus' mother, Mahlaqa, is a local leader of Jamaat-e-Islami, one of the main hardline religious parties in Pakistan. The family speculated the arrest was a political ploy to discredit her and the party, which is part of an ultraconservative coalition that came in third in last year's parliamentary elections, largely on the strength of a virulently anti-American platform.
Ameer-ul Azeem, spokesman for Jamaat-e-Islami, said Qadus had not done anything wrong.
"Arabs, Afghans, Sudanese, it is not a sin to host them as guests, unless their crime is proven," he said when asked whether Qadus or his family had links with al-Qaida.
Interior Ministry spokesman Iftikhar Ahmed brushed off the family's claims, saying Qadus, Mohammed and the third man were all arrested at the family's home.
The bearded Qadus, who has a similar appearance to the person who is said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, was released from jail after three weeks and still had his beard.
There are very few photographs of the person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and they are not dated, although they are said to be taken shortly after his arrest.
Where did the photos of the man said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed come from and why are there so few photos of him available? If he was captured on March 1, 2003, then he has been in U.S. custody more than for 4 years!
If this man was truly the commander of Al Qaida military forces and masterminded the attacks of 9-11 - why has so little attention been paid to him?
Why is he not being tried in federal courts for the murder of 3,000 Americans on 9-11? Why is he being kept totally incommunicado in Cuba?
If he is the mastermind behind the 9-11 attacks, he belongs in a U.S. courtroom to explain what he did and how he did it. Why is he still in Cuba? What's going on here?


The Denial of Justice for 9-11 Victims

March 20, 2007
After five and a half years of the loathsome "war on terror," with its costly and disastrous wars and tedious preoccupation with "homeland security," the public has grown weary of the media discussion of 9-11. With the passage of time, the hiding of the evidence and the flood of disinformation, many people have lost interest in the developments and details of the terror attacks that brought this misery upon us.
On the other hand, thanks to the Internet, a significant percentage of the U.S. population simply does not believe that Osama bin Laden and his nebulous Al Qaida organization committed the terror attacks that killed some 3,000 people on 9-11.
In 1981, William Casey, then director of the CIA, said with confidence, "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." In the Information Age, however, government disinformation is challenged by the Internet. The deception about 9-11, pushed by the controlled media outlets, has clearly failed to convince the skeptical public about who is really behind the seminal event that was exploited to launch the "War on Terror."
It is not widely known, for example, that not one single victim's case from 9-11 has been heard in a court of law. Because the United States is known to be an extremely litigious society with hordes of lawyers, it was expected that the relatives of the 9-11 victims would seek justice and compensation in the courts. While thousands of the relatives have sought justice in the courts, they have yet to find it. Some 6,600 lawsuits were brought against the airlines and the passenger screening companies, but not one victim's case has gone to trial.
Much of the physical evidence, such as the steel from the World Trade Center, has been destroyed and other crucial evidence remains concealed. Thousands of government employees who may have noticed something unusual or may know something about what actually happened on 9-11 have been effectively gagged after having received secret letters ordering that they remain silent. Threatened with the loss of their jobs, their pensions, or their freedom, there have been very few "whistle blowers" coming forth with information.
The judge who is handling all of the 9-11 victims' cases, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, has said that he wants the 58 or so remaining cases resolved as quickly as possible. What this means is that he wants the weary plaintiffs to negotiate with Sheila L. Birnbaum, the "special mediator" for the court, and accept the money offered to them. In this way nearly all of the cases have been resolved through out-of-court settlements.
Photo: Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, the Zionist who oversees and handles all 9-11 victim lawsuits.
He is hijacking the 9-11 victim lawsuits:
By accepting the compensation the relatives forfeit the right to sue the government, the airlines, or the passenger screening companies. In this way, the question of accountability has been avoided for more than 5 years, because there has been no trial in which the essential facts have been established with evidence.
"I doubt very much that Ms. Birnbaum is going to remain in her facility beyond June [2007] and probably not even that far. It's now September," Judge Hellerstein said during the court hearing on September 28, 2006. "March or April [2007] would be probably a reasonable target date to finish up."
"There is an extraordinary public benefit in having these cases resolved and not allowing through them the wounds of 9-11 suffered by our entire society to keep festering," Hellerstein said at the December 11 hearing. Hellerstein clearly wants to have the cases resolved as quietly and quickly as possible – but is that justice?
"I want justice," 9-11 widow Ellen Mariani says. "I want accountability. Who is responsible? I want the truth." Discovery has been complicated and contentious. "How can you have a trial without discovery?" Mariani asks.
Photo: Ellen Mariani, whose husband, Neil, allegedly died when United Air Lines (UAL) Flight 175 crashed into the World Trade Center
More than 5 years after she filed the first wrongful death lawsuit against United Airlines for the loss of her husband, Mariani is still seeking the truth about 9-11. Her case, in which she is now only a beneficiary, is one of the last remaining unresolved cases.
Sheila Birnbaum, the special mediator, is a partner in the law firm of Skadden Arps, a leading corporate law firm with close business ties to Israel. The firm calls itself one of the leading U.S. legal advisers to Israeli companies "doing business and raising capital" outside of Israel. "Many of our attorneys are thoroughly familiar with the legal structure, business environment and political system of Israel, and several have been admitted to the bars of both Israel and New York and are fluent in Hebrew and English," the firm's website says.
Israeli individuals and companies, however, are suspects and defendants in the crimes of 9-11. At least 200 Israeli suspects were arrested in connection with 9-11. An Israeli airport security company, Huntleigh USA, is at the very center of the story. Huntleigh, the passenger screening company that checked the passengers at the airports of Boston and Newark on 9-11, is a wholly owned subsidiary of ICTS, an Israeli company headed by Menachem Atzmon, a political ally of prime minister Ehud Olmert and a man convicted of illegally raising funds for the Likud Party while he was the party's co-treasurer with Olmert in the 1980s.
Scores of Israeli "movers" and "art students" were arrested in New York and Florida as suspects in connection with the events of 9-11. The evidence clearly indicates that the terror attacks were Israeli "false flag" operations which were carried out to blame Moslems and Arabs and instigate the Zionist-planned "war on terror" against the enemies of Israel. The Israeli terror suspects were quietly released without going to trial while innocent Arabs were wrongly blamed. This was done while the criminal division of the Department of Justice was headed by the Israeli-American Michael Chertoff.
Now that a detainee known as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), the alleged Al Qaida commander and mastermind of the terror attacks, has confessed, it seems likely that lawsuits will be brought against him by the families of the victims. A lawsuit brought by any of the relatives against KSM would reveal whether his confession is true or not by bringing out evidence in a court. This discovery process is essential to determine the true extent of his involvement, and that of others, in the terror attacks of 9-11.
No defense attorney or journalist was allowed to attend the hearing, which was meant to determine whether the detainee known as KSM could be classified as an "enemy combatant." In the eyes of the government and the controlled press, however, the confession clears the way for the Pentagon to declare the detainee an "enemy combatant" and try him in a U.S. military war crimes court, which would have the authority to issue a death sentence.
An enemy combatant is defined as "an individual who was part of or supporting the Taliban or al Qaida forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This includes any person who committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces." This means that any person who takes up arms to resist the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq or Afghanistan can be considered an "enemy combatant."
While banner headlines shouted "9-11 architect confesses" there was surprising little follow-up discussion in the media. While controlled news outlets such as Al Jazeera are clearly trying to support the seemingly outrageous claims made by a detainee known as KSM, the public simply isn't buying it. Although hardly scientific, CNN conducted an online poll the day the story broke in the newspapers and found that, regarding the truthfulness of the confession, skeptics outnumbered believers by a margin of more than 3-to-1. Seventy-six percent of the nearly 100,000 respondents to the poll said they did not believe that the disheveled detainee seen in the photos was truly the mastermind of 9-11 and 30 other terror attacks, including the Bali bombing and the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993.
Yosri Fouda, a bureau chief for Al Jazeera, interviewed Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in Pakistan during the first week of September 2002. Reports of the KSM interview were reported in the BBC on September 8, 2002. Oddly, Fouda, who is the only journalist to have interviewed KSM, has said nothing about whether the person in the photo resembles the person he interviewed in 2002. Fouda has, however, questioned whether Al Qaida even exists: "I do not really believe there is such a thing as al-Qaida, the organization; there is al-Qaida, the mind-set."
The detainee, Fouda wrote in the Sunday Times on March 18, "might be taking credit so other people, still at large, can avoid the blame. We can never know for sure." The bizarre confession, supposedly made by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, has been played up in the U.S. media as proof that Al Qaida actually planned and carried out the terror attacks at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001.
Although the detainee's confession was read before a military tribunal in Guantanamo, Cuba, on March 10, it was held by the government and not released until late Wednesday, March 14. The delayed release of the confession effectively obscured a very important article about how the 9-11 families are being denied access to the government's evidence.
The confession by a tortured detainee in a super-secret gulag prison in Cuba is one thing, but access to the government's evidence is quite another. USA Today, the CIA-linked newspaper, ran the headline "Prisoner confesses 9-11 was his work" on March 15, while a much smaller article entitled "Families denied 9-11 evidence" was found at the bottom of page 9.
The Chicago Tribune, on the other hand, ran the headline "9-11 architect confesses," but chose not to even report the decision by a federal appeals court to reverse the ruling that the government should turn over evidence from the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui to family members of those killed in the terrorist attacks. Such distorted media coverage of the 9-11 cases, in which the press focuses on the government's trials of the accused terrorists while ignoring the fate of the 6,600 lawsuits brought by the relatives of the victims, speaks volumes about the bias of the controlled press in the United States.
There are several indicators that the KSM confession is not credible. The first problem is that KSM was reported to have been killed in Pakistan in September 2002, shortly after his interview with Yosri Fouda of Al Jazeera. Syed Saleem Shahzad, a senior political correspondent with the Dawn Group of newspapers in Karachi, Pakistan, reported in October 2002 that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed had been killed in a raid carried out by the FBI and ISI in Karachi on September 11, 2002:
"Now it has emerged that Kuwaiti national Khalid Sheikh Mohammed did indeed perish in the raid, but his wife and child were taken from the apartment and handed over to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), in whose hands they remain," Shahzad reported on 30 October 2002. "Nine other suspected terrorists were captured, and two were killed. A woman FBI official examined the bodies, and, as reported by an ISI official, suddenly exclaimed, 'You have killed Khalid Sheikh Mohammad.' The woman then instructed that a finger be cut off the body, which she took away, presumably for a DNA test," Shahzad wrote.
"ISI officials close to the case at this time were convinced, as were the FBI, that Khalid had been killed. But they chose not to disclose the death as they wanted other al-Qaeda members to attempt to remain in contact with him through the recovered satellite telephones, mobile phones and laptop computers."
There are other problems challenging the credibility of the confession that surfaced in a super-secret military tribunal in an off-shore prison in Cuba. The detainee who is supposedly making this historic confession did not even identify himself or take an oath before the evidence was presented.
The president of the tribunal simply began with these words: "Before we begin, Khalid Sheikh Muhammad, I understand you speak and understand English. Is that correct?" The transcript then notes that the detainee only nodded his head. A non-verbal response, such as a nod, is not acceptable in a court of law.
The transcript reveals that the detainee's English skills are very poor, not what one would expect from a person who earned an engineering degree from an American university, as did the real KSM. The real KSM attended Chowan College, a small Baptist school in Murfreesboro, North Carolina, for one semester in 1983, and then transferred to North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NCAT), where he completed a degree in mechanical engineering in 1986.
Furthermore, the real KSM was a person who had traveled and worked extensively across Asia and had lived in many foreign countries, from the United States to the Philippines to Bosnia. With this level of education and foreign travel, the real KSM would have a much greater command of the English language than what we find in the transcript.
There were no defense attorneys or members of the press allowed to the secret hearing in which the military tribunal heard the confession of the alleged architect of 9-11.
"The Detainee served as the head of the Al Qaida military committee and was Osama bin Laden's principal Al Qaida operative who directed the 11 September 2002 attacks in the United States," the statement said.
“I was responsible for the 9-11 operation, from A to Z,’’ the detainee said through an interpreter, according to the transcript of the hearing. He also claimed responsibility for the 1993 bombing at the World Trade Center. The detainee sat with an Arabic interpreter to his left and a U.S. military officer who was his official representative to his right.
"I not take the oath…" the detainee said in broken English about why he was not taking an oath in the court. "Just to explain for this one, does not mean I'm not saying that I'm lying. When I not take oath does not mean I'm lying."
"I understand," the tribunal president said. But how can such meaningless gibberish coming from an unidentified detainee who has not taken an oath be seen by anyone as a credible confession?
No photographs accompanied the release of the KSM confession and there are very few photos of the person who is accused of being the terrorist mastermind of our time. To see if the disheveled, hairy, and overweight person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed resembled the mechanical engineering student that studied in Greensboro in the 1980s, I contacted the engineering faculty of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University.
Photo: The person who is said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
David E. Klett, a retired professor of thermodynamics, had the real KSM in several of his classes. Asked about the photos of the person said to be the terror mastermind, Klett said, "I did not recognize that person. I never saw that face before."

Why are Honest 9-11 Researchers Targeted?

May 15, 2007
Three weeks after I was assaulted and arrested, a fellow 9-11 researcher Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University was slandered on the local NPR affiliate as an "anti-Semite" and removed from his teaching position at that prestigious Mormon school. Dr. Jones and I had collaborated in the spring of 2006 on his research into the causes of the molten metal seen at the World Trade Center. I had learned and written about the discovery of molten iron in the basements of the three collapsed towers in the summer of 2002. These reports had piqued the interest of Jones several years later. His scientific interest resulted in his hypothesis that Thermite-type charges had been used to demolish the twin towers and the 47-story WTC 7.
I took Dr. Jones' research to the University of California at Davis where I met with Professor Thomas Cahill. Cahill had collected data and analyzed the smoke (with a Davis DRUM) that rose from the WTC debris pile from early October until Christmas 2001. The extraordinary abundance of nano-size particles in the smoke indicated that the molten metal beneath the towers was hotter than the boiling point of iron and the other metals found in the bluish smoke. This is the kind of evidence that those who support the official version hate.
Were the attacks on me and Professor Jones related? Were we attacked, slandered, and discredited because we were asking too many questions about the use of Thermite on 9-11?
In her recent article, "War and the Police State: Complicity of the American People," Donna J. Thorne wrote, "Fearing exposure, the Czars of Propaganda know that 'Truthers' must be branded and discredited if government corruption and corporate fraud is to flourish unabated."
"Fear attempts to silence dissenters," Thorne wrote. "As the Truth Movement gains momentum and amasses credibility, the fear profiteers have begun heralding yet another 'threat' to National Security - inquiring minds. This is both good news and bad news. We are no longer ignorable. Fearing exposure, the Czars of Propaganda know that 'Truthers' must be branded and discredited if government corruption and corporate fraud is to flourish unabated. This said, prepare for an intensified Smear-and-Fear Campaign. Any group or individual who vocally questions the official story of 9-11 or who exercises the right to demand Government accountability will be labeled 'Anti-American and Anti-Patriotic.'"
Will we allow that? Will we stand up for the truth or will we quietly submit to the lies?

Judge Forces Families to Settle Out of Court

September 9, 2007
With the 6th anniversary of 9-11 only 2 days away, the New York Post has published an article highlighting a callous comment made by the Manhattan federal Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who said that the families of the 9-11 victims should settle for cash and get on with their lives. The New York Post article of September 9, 2007, entitled "Familes Fume at 'Callous' Judge" by Susan Edelman reported:
Some of the 41 families who refused 9-11 compensation to press lawsuits against airlines are furious at remarks by the presiding judge, who hopes they will give up their day in court - if the price is right. Manhattan federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein says the die-hard 9-11 families should settle for cash and move on.
"Money is the universal lubricant," Hellerstein said, admitting his comments were "crass." "Each of us has a choice: Either to never forget that pain and have it ever present in our lives, or to fashion a life beyond the pain," the judge said at a recent hearing.
"Somehow, we need to get past Sept. 11, 2001, as a country and individually."
His comments angered the holdouts who want to hold the airlines accountable for the ease with which 19 terrorist killers boarded four planes.
"It bothers me a great deal that someone in charge of this trial has become so cynical," fumed Mike Low, the dad of a flight attendant aboard American Airlines Flight 11, the first to crash into the World Trade Center
"He can't understand our loss. He sees the solution in a very cold and pragmatic way - in dollars and cents. He thinks everybody should take the money and go away."
Low's daughter, Sara, 29, spent her last moments calming terrified passengers and helping crewmates call in reports of the hijacking.
"Sara was murdered on 9-11. Her voice is silent, so I must speak for my daughter," Low said.
Prior to the article in the Post, this outrageous comment by the Alvin K. Hellerstein, the U.S. district judge who is presiding over all 9-11 victims cases, had only been reported in one other newspaper: the Boston Herald of September 4. Hellerstein made these incredibly callous comments during a June 25 court conference:
I learned long ago as a lawyer that many cases of principle stop being cases of principle when there are elements of expense or recovery that are presented. I have had clients come to me and say look, I want you to defend me, it is a case of principle. Then when I presented my first bill, it stopped being a case of principle. I think it is common experience.
Similarly on the other side, people say I don't care what the recovery is, I want my day in court until someone gives them a check.
It is very crass and it probably will come back to be critical of me, but there is an expression that is sometimes very useful, "Money is the universal lubricant." It makes it easier to go on with one's life.
Out of the mundane, you can fashion something that makes a great deal of sense. We are coming on six years from the terrible event of September 11th, 2001. The public life is 4 score and 10, if it is correct. There is a great value in living out those years that God has allotted to each of us in a way that is most productive for the individual and for society.
What happened on September 11th, 2001 is now a memory with different degrees of pain for different people, for some degree of pain for each and every American and perhaps beyond the United States of America. Each of us has a choice either to never forget that pain and have it ever present in our lives or to fashion a life beyond the pain. If one looks at the issue in that way -- and I suggest that it is the only way to look at it -- the question then becomes what's the fairest, the most efficient, what is the best way to get on with the rest of our lives.
It seems to me that if I were your client, Ms. Schiavo, and one day perhaps I'll be lucky enough to perhaps be your client or a client of someone else or perhaps maybe I'll be lucky, lucky to have avoided some of the terrible problems in life that brings us -- in any event, if I were your client and I were presented with an opportunity to get a fair and proper disposition, I think I would jump at the chance.
Perhaps if the opportunity came to Mr. and Mrs. Carstanjen with regard to the memory they have of their son, they would find the benefits of a fair and proper disposition so important and so appropriate as to go past their suffering. They have others. They can do good for themselves and for others. There is a value in this.
In a way that I was called upon to express here, this is really what I am trying to achieve with all the settlements.
I am not trying to cut values here, I am not trying to cut short any justice or compromise in any way. I am trying to deal as best I can with a problem that is searing. Somehow we need to get past September 11, 2001 as a country and individually for all clients, and I would like to bring about that possibility as best I can, as efficiently as I can in a short a period of time as I can.
Note: The old website for 9-11 litigation documents,, has been changed. The new website does not allow access to the documents as before.
For the 9-11 plaintiffs and millions of others around the world who are hoping for justice and discovery about who is really responsible for the terror attacks that took 3,000 lives, they may now realize that Judge Hellerstein is not at all inclined to go down that path.
To understand where Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein's loyalties lie is key to understanding why he is so adamantly opposed to open trials and a public airing of the 9-11 evidence. For background reading I recommend my earlier article about Hellerstein and his Zionist roots, "The Judicial Hijacking of the 9-11 Victim Lawsuits."
Photo: United States District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York.
Judge Hellerstein has deep and long-standing Zionist connections and close family ties to the state of Israel. Mildred Hellerstein, his wife, for example, is a former senior vice president and current treasurer of a New York-based Zionist organization called AMIT. AMIT promotes Jewish immigration to Israel and stands for Americans for Israel and Torah. AMIT's motto is "Building Israel - One Child at a Time."
Judge Hellerstein is also a long-time member of The Jewish Center of New York and a former president of the Board of Jewish Education of Greater New York.
One of the defendants in the 9-11 victims' tort litigation is the Israeli-owned and Mossad-run airport security and passenger screening company Huntleigh USA Corp. Huntleigh USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Israeli company called International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) International N.V., a Netherlands-based aviation and transportation security firm headed by "former [Israeli] military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies [Mossad, Shin Bet, etc.]."
Why, in the 9-11 terror case in which an Israeli security company is a key defendant and individuals from Israeli military intelligence are suspected of being involved, was Hellerstein chosen to preside over all 9-11 victim lawsuits -- and who chose him?

The Court's Crass Comments about 9-11 Litigation

September 10, 2007

I find it extremely telling that the New York Times and other leading newspapers and media outlets failed to report the crass comments of the judge who is handling all of the 9-11 lawsuits in which he basically told the victims' relatives to take the cash and move on. The high-handed way in which Judge Hellerstein is obstructing justice and preventing the relatives from obtaining discovery is nothing less than scandalous.
The 41 families that are still pursuing litigation are doing so because they want to know who is responsible for the loss of their loved ones. They want accountability. Judge Hellerstein, however is pushing to resolve their cases through out-of-court settlements - without discovery.
Former Boston Logan airport FAA security official Brian Sullivan, a close observer of the 9-11 families, said this in response to Hellerstein's crass comments:
We are a country founded on principles. The remaining 9-11 plaintiffs seek justice through discovery and a trial. To assume that compensation can dissipate their principles, and ease their pain, is an assumption the judge shouldn't make.  
Al Qaeda and their Islamic Fundamentalist Extremist brethren are fanatically dedicated to their cause. If money can compromise our principles, they have us defeated before we've even begun to fight.
About the withholding of information from the court because of censorship by the Dept. of Homeland Security's SSI restrictions, Sullivan said:
The Sensitive Security Information designator is supposed to be used to protect information in the interests of national security, not as a shield to cloud government and/or airline negligence and incompetence....This has complicated and obfuscated the process, as the plaintiffs continue to battle for information in discovery and has been the main reason liability trials have been delayed for going on six years.
Source: 9-11: Principle versus Compensation, Nick Schwellenbach, Project on Government Oversight
Hellerstein concluded the afternoon hearing on June 25, 2007 with these comments:
Somehow we need to get past September 11, 2001 as a country and individually for all clients, and I would like to bring about that possibility as best I can, as efficiently as I can in a short a period of time as I can. I guess we are all enlisted in that cause. It is to that end I want to develop these kinds of procedures that I am talking about.
Have a good 4th of July. See you soon.
(Court adjourned)
Photo: U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein who is pushing the 9-11 relatives to settle without getting justice through discovery. "Money is the universal lubricant," Hellerstein says. What he means is take the cash [U.S. government money] and forget about accountability.
Now why would a judge say that while we have the 9-11 mastermind, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in the U.S. gulag in Guantanamo? Why doesn't Hellerstein bring KSM up to Manhattan and have a real trial so we can find out how he pulled it off?

Homeland Security & the Exclusion of Evidence

September 11, 2007
The families of the victims of 9-11 have been, and continue to be, abused by the corrupt judicial process that is clearly more concerned about covering up for those responsible than delivering justice and accountability through discovery.
The manner in which the grieving relatives of 9-11 have been treated is nothing short of scandalous. The people who are obstructing the relatives' quest for justice through discovery are complicit in a high-level cover-up and are violating the human rights of the people affected by the terror attacks of 9-11. The people who are part of the 9-11 cover-up have names and faces and need to be held accountable.
Just a few blocks from the site of the World Trade Center, in the new Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse in lower Manhattan, a pre-trial conference for the 41 remaining wrongful death and personal injury cases brought by the families of those killed and injured on 9-11 was scheduled for the afternoon of September 11, 2007.
Who in their right mind would schedule a pre-trial conference for the relatives of 9-11 on the anniversary of the day they lost their loved ones? To a sensible person, this would seem most insensitive and inconsiderate of the feelings of the victims' families. For the families seeking accountability after 6 years, it might feel more like insult added to injury.
The person who scheduled the conference is Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, the U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York. Hellerstein presides over all the lawsuits for the victims of 9-11 involving claims related to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. All cases naming an airline, an airport security company, and/or the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey have been consolidated for discovery and other pre-trial proceedings with Judge Hellerstein.
Hellerstein also oversees the lawsuits brought by Ground Zero workers against the city. Congress allocated New York $1 billion because the city could not find sufficient insurance against negligence suits. Gravely ill first responders and workers from the smoking pile of rubble have yet to receive any compensation.
"It was our intent that the money be used to protect injured workers and not swallowed up by lawyers and legal fees," said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY). "I never could have imagined we would end up where we are now, without one single worker compensated."
The disgraceful lack of progress in the proceedings of the 9-11 litigation is a subject that the controlled media avoids, leaving the public unaware of the judicial abuse the relatives of the victims of 9-11 have endured at the hands of a corrupt legal system that is more interested in settling the remaining cases out of court than delivering what the remaining families want most of all - accountability and justice through discovery.
Judge Hellerstein has long been urging the plaintiffs and their lawyers to settle out of court. In comments he made in a pre-trial conference on June 25, which he admitted could be seen as "very crass," Hellerstein said "money is the universal lubricant." The presiding judge urged the lawyers and the remaining 41 families to take the "most efficient" way, meaning settle for the money and "get on" with their lives:
It is very crass and it probably will come back to be critical of me, but there is an expression that is sometimes very useful, "Money is the universal lubricant." It makes it easier to go on with one's life.
In a move that is seen as very unusual, Hellerstein has scheduled trials to begin September 24 to determine the size of payments the families could receive before holding liability trials to establish who is legally responsible for the security breakdowns. This is seen as a move to hasten out of court settlements.
"It bothers me a great deal that someone in charge of this trial has become so cynical," Mike Low, the father of Sara, a flight attendant aboard American Airlines Flight 11, said about the judge's comments.
"He can't understand our loss. He sees the solution in a very cold and pragmatic way - in dollars and cents. He thinks everybody should take the money and go away."
"Sara was murdered on 9-11," Low said. "Her voice is silent, so I must speak for my daughter."
Brian Sullivan, a former FAA security official at Boston's Logan Airport, said: "We are a country founded on principles. The remaining 9-11 plaintiffs seek justice through discovery and a trial. To assume that compensation can dissipate their principles, and ease their pain, is an assumption the judge shouldn't make."
Hellerstein's "cold and pragmatic" approach is not new. Abusing the relatives' human rights by denying them the justice and trials that they deserve has happened before in similar cases in which government officials are involved in high-level cover-ups. I have personally been involved in a similar case that is now nearly 11 years old.
The litigation concerning the 1994 Estonia catastrophe, the largest martime disaster in Europe since World War II, has been stuck in a legal quagmire in a French court since September 1996. Thirteen years after the sinking of Estonia, the relatives of the 852 souls lost still have not had their day in court and it doesn't look like they will ever get it. There has been no discovery in the French court and there is no hope that there will ever be a trial to determine who was responsible for the catastrophe.
In August 2006, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg registered the Estonia case in which relatives of the deceased are suing the governments of Sweden and France for violating their human rights by denying them the fair and open trial they deserve.
The relatives accuse the two countries, the judges, the defendants, and the insurance companies with having conspired to block the legal process that should deliver discovery and accountability for the catastrophe.
The 9-11 relatives are in a very similar predicament. Rather than pushing for discovery and liability trials, Judge Hellerstein wants the relatives to "get past" 9-11 and "get on with the rest" of their lives.
"Somehow we need to get past September 11, 2001 as a country and individually for all clients," he said, "and I would like to bring about that possibility as best I can, as efficiently as I can in a short a period of time as I can."
The right to a fair trial is a universally recognized human right. Thinking I could get a fair trial is why I chose a jury trial when I was falsely charged with assaulting and resisting three heavily-armed and armor-clad men who were prowling around my house in August 2006. The men were an undercover tactical unit who had been watching me for several days.
As I prepared for my trial, a supporter warned me that the side that wins in a trial is the side that gets the most evidence excluded. When I went to trial, I had made more than a dozen exhibits with documented evidence of a police conspiracy, but the judge, Hyman I. Riebman, wouldn't allow most of the evidence to be admitted and simply refused to let my expert witness testify about police procedures.
As I had been warned, the side that gets the most evidence excluded wins. So it is. This is exactly what is happening with the 9-11 cases as well. Crucial evidence and key witnesses are being excluded from the process long before any trial begins.
The first person one might expect to see in a U.S. criminal court would be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "mastermind" of the terror attacks. Why is Mohammed, who reportedly confessed to being the mastermind behind 9-11 sitting in a U.S. military prison in Guantanamo, Cuba?
Besides Mr. Mohammed, there are a host of witnesses and piles of evidence, documents, and depositions that have been excluded from the 9-11 tort litigation cases through the use of a little-known but wide-ranging censorship mechanism known as Sensitive Security Information (SSI).
On November 16, 2001, Congress passed the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (ATSA), which the President signed into law on November 19, 2001. Under ATSA, Congress created the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and authorized the agency to make improvements in the country’s transportation security. Based on this authority, the Under Secretary of Transportation for Security transferred authority for the existing Federal Aviation Administration regulations, which include SSI, to the TSA on February 22, 2002.
The SSI is part of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and is spelled out in 49 C.F.R. 1520.7, which is summarized below. The CFR is the codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government. It is important to note that these are not laws or executive orders, but regulations.
The Federal Register notice on the regulations describes SSI as including “information about security programs, vulnerability assessments, technical specifications of certain screening equipment and objects used to test screening equipment ... and other information.” Clearly the SSI have everything to do with the passenger screening procedures that were in employed by the three foreign-owned airline security firms involved on 9-11. The failure of these firms to stop the hijackers is seen by the relatives as a key reason for the catastrophe.
These are some of the key SSI restrictions:
Section 1520.7(a) protects any security program “that relates to United States mail to be transported by air.”
Section 1520.7(b) through (d) covers security directives and information circulars, selection criteria used in the security screening process, and security contingency plans and/or instructions pertaining to those plans.
Section 1520.7(e) through (g) relates to any technical specification of any device or equipment used for security communications, screening, or “detecting deadly or dangerous weapons,” including an “explosive, incendiary, or destructive substance.”
Section 1520.7(h) covers the release of information that TSA “has determined may reveal a systemic vulnerability of the aviation system, or a vulnerability of aviation facilities, to attack.”
Section 1520.7(i) protects “information [released by TSA] concerning threats against transportation.”
Section 1520.7(j) protects “details of aviation security measures.”
Section 1520.7(k) and (l) relates to any “information” TSA has prohibited from disclosure under the criteria of 49 U.S.C. 40119, or any draft, proposed, or recommended change to the information or records identified in this section.
Section 1520.7(m) through (p) covers locations, tests, and scores of tests on all screening methods or equipment.
Section 1520.7(q) protects “images and descriptions of threat images for threat projection systems.”
Section 1520.7(r) relates to all Department of Transportation information on “vulnerability assessment ... irrespective of mode of transportation.”
Source: "SSI and Transportation Security: Background and Controversies" by Mitchel A. Sollenberger, Congressional Research Service
When the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was established in November 2002, the TSA became a branch of the new security department. Michael Chertoff, the U.S. Assistant Attorney General with Israeli roots, became DHS secretary on February 15, 2005, when he was confirmed by the U.S. Senate and sworn in.
When 9-11 occurred, Asst. Attorney General Chertoff was responsible for the criminal division of the Dept. of Justice. This made him the top official for the law enforcement and investigation process surrounding the terror attacks.
When Chertoff was made secretary of DHS, he became the responsible official for controlling what evidence would be released to the court involved in the 9-11 litigation. This makes Chertoff the person who has been continuously responsible for controlling the investigation and access to the evidence of 9-11.
Many of the 9-11 lawsuits are from families who hold the aviation industry responsible for the security lapses they believe led to the death of their loved ones. "Absolutely there could have been more security," Margaret Ogonowski of Dracut, Mass. told Evan Lehman of the Bennington Banner (N.H.). Ogonowski was an airline attendant whose husband, John, was killed when captaining American Flight 11. "It was just a facade of security," she said.
"It was about pushing for some answers and pushing for accountability," Ogonowski said. "I was on that front line too," she said, but the lawsuit was "painfully slow."
"You get to the point where some people can continue forward and others just have to drop out of the race," Ogonowski said. "It's like any kind of race. You're always going to have some who can see it to the end, and others who can't. I just reached my limit."
"It's six years. We have no accountability. We have more questions that we have answers," another Massachusetts woman, who settled her case and asked that her name not be used, told Lehman. The woman, who lost her husband on American Flight 11 described the Victim Compensation Fund as "government money" that smacked of a payoff.
An airline attorney who spoke on the condition that their name not be used told the Banner that cause-of-guilt trials are at least two or three years away - if they ever come. "I don't think there'll be a trial of wrongful death and personal injuries," the attorney said. "I think at some point they (the families) will settle."
DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff oversees the TSA and the "responsible official" of the SSI Program Office, a Florida lawyer named Andrew E. Colsky.
Chertoff's mother, Livia Eisen, was an Israeli intelligence operative who was involved in top-secret international missions, such as the operation known as "Magic Carpet," which airlifted thousands of Yemenite Jews to Israel in the late 1940s.
The fact that one of the defendants in the 9-11 tort litigation is the Israeli company ICTS International NV and its wholly owned subsidiary Huntleigh USA Corp. raises obvious conflict of interest questions for the Israeli dual-national Chertoff. ICTS is closely linked with Israeli military intelligence.
Huntleigh USA was involved in airport security and passenger screening operations at Boston and Newark airports on 9-11 and the SSI are clearly designed to protect the secrets and actions of the airport security companies. The SSI effectively prevents important information about Huntleigh and the other two foreign-owned security companies from getting anywhere near the court.
In some places Colsky is called the chief, the director, or the expert on SSI, but what he really does is to act as the TSA's chief gatekeeper, or censor, to prevent information from coming to the court. All the information that the lawyers for the 9-11 litigation request has to pass through the censorship of Andrew Colsky.
"The Sensitive Security Information designator is supposed to be used to protect information in the interests of national security, not as a shield to cloud government and/or airline negligence and incompetence," Sullivan said. "This has complicated and obfuscated the process, as the plaintiffs continue to battle for information in discovery, and has been the main reason liability trials have been delayed for going on six years."
Although Colsky is the key person responsible for SSI, the gate-keeping and censoring process that is "the main reason" the 9-11 liability trials have been delayed, there is virtually no mention of him in the U.S. print media. How odd.
A database for lawyers has Andrew Evan Colsky working at 8220 S. W. 52nd Ave. in Miami. He is listed as having studied law at the University of Florida and admitted to the bar on June 11, 1990.
The Virginia Directory of Divorce Mediation and Mediators has an Andrew E. Colsky on its website. It lists him as the "senior mediator" of the American Conflict Management Institute, located at 1200 Ridge Road, in Arlington, Va. The phone number it provides, however, is a Miami number with a 305 area code.
It says that Colsky "mediates employment disputes including complex multi-party disputes" and that he is "an ADR [Alternative Dispute Resolution] program/system designer who served as an integral part of developing the world's largest employment mediation program at the U.S. Postal Service.
A search of 810 newspapers in the United States yields only 7 articles or notices in which "Andrew Colsky" is mentioned, and only 6 in which he is mentioned with his middle initial. Not one newspaper even mentions the fact that he directs the SSI program.
Why would the mainstream media have no interest in the person who is controlling and censoring the information that is crucial to the discovery process in the worst terror attacks in U.S. history? Why is Colsky and the SSI obstruction of the discovery process not even discussed in a land that cherishes its "free press."
A Google search for "Andrew E. Colsky" produces only 20 results. Besides a few mentions of SSI related material, the results connect Colsky with dispute resolution for the U.S. Postal Service and as the author of a book on the famous Biltmore Hotel in Coral Gables, Florida.
There is also an odd business listing indicating that an "Andrew E. Colsky" is, or was, director of a company called Coral Way Partners, Inc. The listing is from a database called Manta at The information provided on Manta's website comes from Dun & Bradstreet (D&B). Oddly, there are only two listings in Google for Colsky and "Coral Way Partners."
The business listing says that "Andrew E. Colsky" is, or was the Director of Coral Way Partners, Inc., which is, or was located at 8220 SW 52nd Ave. in Miami, Florida. Colsky's business, which is described as providing "business services," is listed with the phone number (305) 669-4724.
"Andrew Colsky" is listed in D&B and Manta as being the President of another company, Mediation Associates, Inc. or American Mediation Institute, at the same address on SW 52nd Ave. in Miami. Mediation Associates, with one employee, and Coral Way Partners, Inc. apparently shared the same office and phone number.
D&B has only one company listed with the name Coral Way Partners, which is listed as having 2 employees with yearly sales of $120,000. The name of Colsky's "partner" in Coral Way Partners is not provided, nor is the year of the listing.
Metrobot, however, has a 2005 listing for Coral Way Partners at the SW 52nd Ave. address. A doctor named Arthur S. Colsky is also listed at the same address along with Andrew Colsky's Mediation Associates. Dr. Colsky's mother, Irene Colsky, is listed as self-employed at the same address.
Coral Way is the historic scenic road that runs East and West between downtown Miami and Coral Gables. It is somewhat odd that Colsky would have a business called Coral Way Partners located in an office nearly 5 miles south of the famous ficus and banyan tree-lined Coral Way.
It is also odd that in March 2007, a Miami business with a very similar name, Salman Coral Way Partners, was designated by the U.S. Treasury as a "front" acting for Colombia’s North Valle Drug Cartel.
Salman Coral Way Partners is listed at 2731 Coral Way, about 6 miles northeast of the Coral Way Partners office at 8220 SW 52nd Ave.
On March 7, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added two U.S. companies, C.W. Salman Partners and Salman Coral Way Partners, to its list of Specially Designated Narcotics Traffickers (SDNTs) for their ties to Colombia's drug cartel.
While it appears that Salman Coral Way Partners and Coral Way Partners are two separate companies, there is virtually no information about Colsky's company or what it did.
It seems very odd that Colsky, the director of the SSI program for TSA, would be the director of a company with the same name, in the same part of Miami, as a company linked to the Colombian drug cartel. Of course, it may be just a coincidence, but it seems to be quite an odd coincidence.
If, however, the two Coral Way Partners companies in South Miami are connected in some way, it would be a very interesting development in the 9-11 cover-up.

The Toxic Smoke from the Rubble

September 13, 2007

"Clearing the Air" is a recent article written by Graham Rayman for the Village Voice (New York) that seeks to make sense of the claims being made by tens of thousands of New Yorkers who are suing the City of New York because of ill health, disease, or death thought to be caused by the "9-11 toxic cloud" and dust.
"Sorting solid claims about the 9-11 toxic cloud from the obscuring haze of uncertainty," is the subtitle of the article. Unfortunately, the article failed to mention the extremely toxic smoke that rose from the burning rubble for nearly four months.
See: "Clearing the Air," Graham Rayman, Village Voice, August 28, 2007
Having met New Yorkers who have been severely affected by a host of chronic diseases caused by exposure to the dust and smoke from the destroyed World Trade Center, I have seen how the toxic plumes and clouds devastated so many lives.
While I appreciate Rayman's work, "Clearing the Air" misses one very important aspect. I am responding for the benefit of those who have been affected by the toxic dust and smoke, those who care for them, and those who litigate on their behalf.
Rayman wrote:
The World Trade Center health crisis is a saga told on a massive scale. Consider: 10,000 people have signed up for the pending class-action lawsuit against the city, and 71,000 for the city's World Trade Center Health Registry. Nearly 20,000 people have been screened in Mount Sinai's medical-monitoring program. More than 1,300 people have been treated at the city-funded WTC clinic at Bellevue Hospital.
The estimated number of Ground Zero responders is 40,000, and the estimated number of people who came in contact with the dust is 410,000.
Yes, but how many people were exposed to the toxic smoke that wafted over New York City for the next three months?
First, it needs to clarified that there were primarily two types of "toxic cloud" caused by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Rayman writes about the visible dust seen in the pyroclastic clouds that rolled down the streets of lower Manhattan after the explosive demolition of the twin towers and Larry Silverstein's WTC 7. But he is missing the smoke that rose from "the pile" until Christmas 2001.
It needs to be remembered that extremely hot spots burned beneath "the pile" for more than three months until they exhausted themselves at Christmas 2001. These hot-spots were evidently hotter than the boiling point of iron (2861 degrees Celsius or 5182 degrees Fahrenheit) and many other metals. Molten iron, in the molten state, was found in the basements of all three towers weeks after they were demolished. These hotspots, which the evidence suggests were caused by on-going aluminothermic reactions fueled by massive amounts of Thermite, continuously produced a huge amount of extremely small particles in the nano-size range that rose from the pile in plumes of bluish smoke.
This smoke laden with toxic nano-particles wafted over New York City for many weeks and went in all directions. Millions of people may have been exposed to these toxic plumes which can carry toxic particles great distances.
I visited the University of California at Davis in the spring of 2006 to interview Thomas A. Cahill, an expert on airborne particles. Cahill had conducted a study of the particles in the thin bluish smoke that rose from the rubble for nearly 4 months after 9-11.
Cahill's air sampling was done a few blocks north of the destroyed WTC and began on October 2, 2001 and continued until late December, when the last fires were finally extinguished. I asked Cahill why it had taken so long to begin monitoring the air contamination caused by the destruction of the WTC. He said that he had assumed that there were scores of agencies and scientists monitoring the air quality in New York City after 9-11. "I assumed it was happening. I could not believe it was not," Cahill said. "It [the Davis DRUM] was all by itself. The EPA did nothing."
Cahill's air monitoring device revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the category of the smallest ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. For the people who worked or lived near "the pile" of the destroyed World Trade Center, these plumes were extremely dangerous.
The conditions were "brutal" for people working at Ground Zero without respirators and slightly less so for those working or living in adjacent buildings, [Thomas A.] Cahill, a professor emeritus of physics and atmospheric science, said. "It was like they were working inside the stack of an incinerator," he said.
"The debris pile acted like a chemical factory. It cooked together the components of the buildings and their contents, including enormous numbers of computers, and gave off gases of toxic metals, acids and organics for at least 6 weeks," he said.
The DELTA Group's work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the category of the smallest ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns.
The extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most unusual aspects of the data, Cahill said. "Ultra-fine particles require extremely high temperatures," Cahill said, "namely the boiling point of the metal."
While Cahill said he was not aware of evidence confirming the existence of molten metal in the rubble of the WTC, his data showing high levels of ultra-fine particles in the smoke plume prove that incredibly intense hot spots, capable of boiling and vaporizing metals and other components from the debris, persisted beneath the rubble for weeks.
These nano-particles are so small that they behave completely differently in the body than the much larger particles that were seen in the pyroclastic dust clouds of 9-11. The nano-size particles are so small, i.e. smaller than one-tenth of a micron, that they can pass freely throughout the human body and are able to penetrate the nucleus of the human cell.
This is the reason why the "particle effect" is so harmful. Having penetrated the cell nucleus, the particle can cause a host of chronic diseases and cancers. It should be noted that the nano-size particle is very dangerous because of its size, and substances that are not normally toxic may be extremely toxic when reduced to such small particles, e.g. Teflon.
Having studied the particle effect with depleted uranium, I have written about it in greater detail.
This is why the two main sources of toxic particles: the dust and the smoke have to be considered as causes of disease and death among the people who worked or lived near the destroyed WTC. The "particle effect" is from another universe than the much larger dust particles.
The Village Voice article does not mention the fact that those who worked on "the pile" were exposed to the extremely toxic smoke of nano-size particles. No respirator can stop nano-particles.
For example, Rayman mentioned that a police officer named Cesar Borja, who had worked at Ground Zero in December 2001, died of pulmonary fibrosis:
At least 12 deaths from lung ailments and cancer have been blamed on the dust cloud in press reports. Among them is firefighter Ray Hauber, 47, who died of esophageal cancer. Friends and family say Hauber was a healthy man who didn't smoke.
In two of the cases -- those of Police Officer James Zadroga, who died of pulmonary fibrosis, and lawyer Felicia Dunn Jones, who died of sarcoidosis -- local medical examiners agreed that exposure to the dust was a factor.
Another was that of Cesar Borja, a police officer who died of pulmonary fibrosis. Initial reports said that he'd worked 16-hour shifts at Ground Zero, but records subsequently showed that he worked there only 17 days, starting in December 2001 -- casting doubt on whether his fatal illness stemmed from his time at Ground Zero.
Rayman said there was doubt that Borja's fatal illness resulted from his time at Ground Zero because he had worked on, or near "the pile" for "only 17 days." On the contrary, the fact that Borja was not exposed to the "dust cloud" but only worked at Ground Zero in December is prima facie evidence of just how toxic the smoke rising from the rubble was.
"In the six years since the attacks, we have accumulated a mountain of evidence that tens of thousands of those exposed are suffering from chronic respiratory disease and, increasingly, a variety of rare cancers," Rep. Jerrold Nadler said during a June 25 congressional hearing. "Increasingly, a variety of rare cancers," Nadler said. This is exactly what occurs in a population exposed to large amounts of toxic nano-particles. The people of Iraq and veterans of the war, for example, are suffering from an epidemic of rare cancers following exposure to nano-size particles of uranium from depleted uranium munitions.
"In courtrooms, hearing rooms, and government offices, there is a paper war raging between people who claim they are sick, and the city, state, and federal agencies that must decide whether to pay for their medical coverage," Rayman wrote.
"More than 3,000 firefighters have sought respiratory treatment since 9-11. Retirements based on lung problems have risen by four times the previous average. The observed drop in lung function after 9-11 was 12 times greater than the average annual decline in the five years before 9-11."
About 116 line-of-duty disability claims by NYPD police officers who responded to Ground Zero have been approved, according to the New York Sun. But more than 3,000 have yet to be resolved.
Rayman's article cites an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine of May 2007. This article about the dust was written by epidemiologists Jonathan Samet and Alison Geyh of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
"More than 5 years after the World Trade Center disaster on September 11, 2001, uncertainty and controversy remain about the health risks posed by inhaling the dust from the collapse of the twin towers, the subsequent fires, and the cleanup effort," Samet and Geyh wrote. "What's clearest and strongest is in the immediate persistence of effects on the respiratory system of the more exposed," Samet told the Village Voice. "Where the uncertainty begins is when one tries to understand the consequences for the broader public and the longer-term effects."
"Even though people exposed to the cloud may be inclined to blame any future illness they contract on that exposure, Samet and Geyh write that the only way to confirm a link is through epidemiological studies that examine a large enough population of exposed people and compare it to a similar population of people who weren't. But that vast and difficult study has yet to be done," Rayman wrote. "Even the full suite of research efforts in progress may never produce the evidence needed to answer all of the questions that will be raised about the long-term health effects of September 11," Samet and Geyh concluded.
Wait a minute. What was the name of the school these professors work for? The Bloomberg School? As in Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York?
Sure enough, Jonathan Samet and Alison Geyh work for the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University. The school is named for Michael R. Bloomberg, the current mayor of New York City, who donated something like $100 million to Johns Hopkins in 2001.
New York City is currently fending off huge class-action lawsuits for the health damage and death caused by the dust and smoke from the destroyed World Trade Center. The sick people have sued the city for compensation, but not a single worker had been compensated by late July 2007.
The sick rescue workers from the World Trade Center site filed a lawsuit charging that a $1 billion insurance fund set up after 9-11 had violated a congressional mandate to pay their injury claims. The suit alleges that WTC Captive Insurance Co., which is controlled by New York City, has drained the money meant for the affected workers, who say that their exposure to toxic dust caused serious illnesses.
"Not a single rescue worker who became sick has seen a penny of this money," said David E. Worby, the lawyer who filed the suit in the state Supreme Court in Manhattan. "It's torturing our people who are sick and dying every day."
Now I understand why the professors from the Bloomberg School of Public Health seem to have a less than can-do attitude about finding the links between the dust and smoke, and the very sick people of New York City. "The main reason we don't have more information is that the federal government hasn't done the research," Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY) said. "The answer is not unknowable."
In late 2006, the Mount Sinai WTC Medical Monitoring Program published a five-year assessment of affected workers. The Mt. Sinai study involved 9,442 responders who were tested between July 2002 and April 2004.
According to the article in the Village Voice, the results are extremely grim:
Sixty-one (61) percent of the workers without prior symptoms developed breathing troubles after 9-11.
Sixty-nine (69) percent reported new or worsened respiratory symptoms after being involved in WTC work.
Fifty-nine (59) percent had symptoms that persisted.
"There should no longer be any doubt about the health effects of the World Trade Center. Our patients are sick," Dr. Robin Herbert, co-director of the Mount Sinai program, said.
"In particular, dozens of cases of blood-cell cancers—like lymphoma and multiple myeloma—among relatively young Ground Zero workers have raised these concerns, Rayman wrote. "Herbert, the Mount Sinai researcher, was quoted as suggesting that such cancers could become a 'third wave' of ailments." This is exactly the kind of damage the particle-effect causes. The "third wave" will most likely be seen by the rare types of cancer and other diseases caused by toxic nano-size particles that wreak havoc in the human cells they have penetrated. The "third wave" may be worse than the first wave.
Not long before she died from lung cancer, lower-Manhattan resident Etta Sanders wrote an essay that was published in the Tribeca Tribune. Sanders blamed her illness on exposure to the dust and smoke from the World Trade Center.
"If the government had said we're not sure about the safety of the air and it would be prudent for residents to stay away, I don't think I would have this cancer," she wrote. "I dearly hope that I am in a small minority of people who were so gravely harmed by the aftermath of the WTC attacks, but I fear otherwise."


9-11 Judge Nominated for Attorney General

September 17, 2007

It is widely reported that President George W. Bush will nominate former Manhattan federal Judge Michael [Bernard] Mukasey to replace Alberto Gonzales as attorney general. With the fraudulent "War on Terror" in full swing and with 9-11 cases in legal limbo, this is a critical appointment at a crucial time.
As I had expected, Bush has appointed a Zionist with close ties to the State of Israel. Mukasey, if confirmed as U.S. Attorney General, will protect the Zionist state and its agents who are suspected of involvement in the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11. Mukasey already has a long record of doing this as the presiding judge of other cases closely connected with 9-11, such as the Larry Silverstein insurance claims against the insurers, the Jose Padilla "dirty bomber" case, and the first WTC bombing case.
Mukasey is a man who is already deeply engaged in the cover-up of 9-11. As the title of a recent Associated Press says, "Mukasey Has Long Terror Resume."
"Retired judge Michael Mukasey is intimately familiar with the nation's legal battles over terrorism. He played a central role in such cases for over a decade," Devlin Barrett wrote for the AP, "much of that time getting around-the-clock protection from armed guards."
Mukasey has also been involved in cases involving Holocaust-era claims against European insurance companies and a case about ownership of gold mines.
As I wrote in "The 9-11 Conundrum: Who will replace Alberto Gonzales?" posted on March 20, 2007:
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is currently being described as "embattled" and may be forced to resign over his handling of the prosecutors' firings. It looks like there is a well orchestrated plan to replace him. Who will replace Gonzales? With terrorist confessions coming out from Guantanamo from people like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, claiming to be the mastermind of 9-11, how will the next Attorney General respond?
How can the Dept. of Justice allow the "mastermind" of 9-11 to avoid being tried in a U.S. court for the murder of 3,000 people on 9-11?
Who will be the first relative to sue the detainee known as KSM for the murder of their loved one? Only by bringing KSM into court will the necessary discovery and evidence be presented. This is the only way we can hope to learn who was really behind the terror attacks of 9-11.
This is the 9-11 conundrum facing the Dept. of Justice and the American nation. Who will be the Attorney General when these issues come to the fore?
Michael Bernard Mukasey is described as "a 66-year-old native New Yorker," for example in the New York Post, who reported that he will face little resistance from Senate Democrats. With Mukasey's Zionist credentials he is most certainly bound to be approved by the Zionist-controlled Senate.
None of the articles, however, describe Mukasey as an orthodox Jew who is closely connected with the Kehilath Jeshurun Synagogue of New York, an orthodox and Zionist synagogue that is affiliated with the Ramaz yeshiva schools.
The Ramaz schools (lower, middle, and upper) take their name from the initial (RMZ) of the Russian-born Zionist leader Rabbi Moses Zevulun Margolies, (1851-1936).
In 1994, when Mukasey was a federal judge in the Southern District of New York and was hearing the case of the first "false flag" bombing of the WTC, his wife, the former Susan Bernstock Saroff, was the headmistress of the Ramaz Lower School.
Michael B. Mukasey married Susan Bernstock Saroff in July 1974. They were married by Rabbi Judah Nadich, the first adviser on Jewish Affairs to General Dwight Eisenhower, the commander of the U.S. forces in Europe. Nadich was involved with the displaced person (DP) camps and requested that the Jewish DPs have their own camps and receive preferable treatment in such things as food and emmigration to the United States.
See: Judah Nadich (1912 — 2007)
Susan is the daughter of Mr. and Mrs. William Bernstock. Her marriage with Mr. Saroff had ended in divorce.
Michael Bernard Mukasey was born on July 28, 1941, to Albert Mukasey and his wife, the former Mae Fischer. He has a sister named Rhoda Eckstein, who evidently married a Norbert Eckstein. Albert Mukasey died in September 1972 and Mae Fischer Mukasey died in February 1975.
Mukasey and his [adopted] lawyer son, Marc, are closely connected with GOP presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani - both serving on his judicial advisory committee. Marc Saroff Mukasey was a 26-year-old enforcement lawyer at the Securities and Exchange Commission in New York in March 1994 when he married Nancy Eve Rothenberg.
Marc is a partner with Bracewell & Giuliani LLP. In 2005, former New York City mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani joined the firm as a senior partner. Both Michael and Marc are generous donors to the Giuliani campaign, having contributed more than $10,000 since December 2006. Michael, the nominee for attorney general, is also a generous donor to Joseph Lieberman, a fellow orthodox Jew.
Source: Open Secrets
Michael Mukasey swore in Mayor-elect Giuliani in 1994 and again in 1998. Sen. Charles Schumer, a Democrat from New York, has long supported Mukasey, a Republican, for the nation's top law-enforcement spot.
Mukasey spent 19 years as a judge after he was appointed by President Reagan. He was chief judge in Manhattan federal court for his final six years on the bench. He retired from public service in 2006 to become a partner at the law firm of Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler. As a judge, Mukasey presided over the trial of Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, who was convicted of bombing the World Trade Center in 1993 and plotting to hit other city landmarks. In the same way that Judge Hyman I. Riebman, another Zionist judge, barred my expert witness from testifying at my trial, Judge Mukasey did the same during the 1995 trial of Rahman, which the New York Times described as a "critical blow" to the defense.
During the trial, Judge Mukasey barred defense lawyers from calling several major witnesses who were experts on Islamic law. The defense had hoped to call the expert witnesses to counter what it called the "prosecution's distortion of Muslim concepts" to incriminate Mr. Abdel Rahman and his 10 co-defendants.
In my case, Judge Riebman refused to allow Gregory Johnson, an expert on police procedures, to testify on how a three-man undercover tactical unit of the Hoffman Estates Police Dept. had responded to my 911 call.
Mukasey sentenced the blind sheik to life in prison and lashed out him for attempting to spill American blood "in a scale unseen in this country since the Civil War."
Mukasey also played a key role in the nation's response to the Sept. 11 attacks, which brought down the World Trade Center towers just blocks from his courthouse. In the days after the attacks, Mukasey and other New York judges worked behind closed doors, seeing some of the first material witnesses detained by federal authorities. This must have included a large number of Israelis, particularly the "five dancing Israelis," who were seen celebrating as they videotaped the destruction of the World Trade Center.
These five Israelis, two of whom were known Mossad agents to U.S. law enforcement, were returned to Israel after having failed lie-detector tests. The jubilant Israeli intelligence agents caught photographing the attacks on the World Trade Center were allowed to return to Israel where they divulged the purpose of their mission on a television program: “Our purpose was to document the event," one of them said in Hebrew.
"They seemed to be taking a movie," the resident who noticed them said. The men were taking video or photos of themselves with the World Trade Center burning in the background, she said. What struck her were the expressions on the men's faces. "They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange," she said.
She found the behavior so suspicious that she wrote down the license plate number of the van and called the police. The FBI was soon on the scene and a statewide bulletin was issued on the van.
The van belonged to a Mossad front company called Urban Moving Systems. Around 4 p.m. on Sept. 11, the van was pulled over, and five Israelis: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari, all between 22 and 27 years old, were arrested at gunpoint. One had $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock while another carried two foreign passports. Box cutters were found in the van.
Photo: Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari, three of the "Five Dancing Israelis" on Israeli television. Oded Ellner (center) said: “Our purpose was to document the event."
The five men, disguised as moving men, had posed for their video camera with the burning towers in the background, smiling and celebrating by clicking their lighters. Hundreds of innocent Americans trapped in the burning towers were being roasted alive as these Israeli agents celebrated.
See: "The Five Dancing Israelis"
The round-up also included many innocent Muslims. An inspector general's report later found, many of the witnesses were subjected to physical and verbal abuse while held in a Brooklyn jail. 

The Conspirators' Unbreakable Bond

September 20, 2007

As expected, the nominee to be next Attorney General of the United States has a long history of obstructing justice, preventing discovery, and covering up the evidence of Israeli involvement in the terror attacks of 9-11.
Photo: President Bush with the nominee Michael B. Mukasey
The fact that all the crucial 9-11 lawsuits have been handled by two Zionist judges from the same synagogue could be considered a coincidence were it not the case that Israeli agents are prime suspects in the "false flag" terror attacks and an Israeli-owned passenger screening company is a key defendant in the 9-11 tort litigation.
With so much evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 in plain view, however, the judges' intimate connection with the State of Israel can not be discarded as mere coincidence. It should rather be viewed as evidence of the on-going, high-level, and well-planned cover-up.
The Zionist judges controlling the 9-11 litigation have acted like the Israeli bulldozers after the massacres in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra, Shatila, and Jenin. Like judicial bulldozers, the mission of these orthodox Jewish judges is to bury the evidence of Israeli involvement in the "false flag" terror attacks of 9-11.
In what might otherwise be seen as coincidence, the two presidentially-appointed federal judges who have presided over the most crucial 9-11 cases are both orthodox Zionist Jews who attend the same Manhattan synagogue and support its Talmudic yeshiva. The federal judges Alvin K. Hellerstein and Michael B. Mukasey, the nominee to be the next U.S. attorney general, are both members of a Zionist congregation, the orthodox Kehilath Jeshrun synagogue of Manhattan, and are active supporters of its yeshiva, the Ramaz School.
A yeshiva is an orthodox Jewish school affiliated with a synagogue where Talmudic interpretation of Mosaic law is taught. In an orthodox yeshiva, the Talmudic interpretation of the Torah is based on rabbinical teaching that completely changes the meaning of Mosaic law. Talmudic interpretation effectively negates the meaning of the Ten Commandments, as the late Israeli scholar Israel Shahak pointed out in his book on Jewish supremicism, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.
To an orthodox Jew, Shahak wrote, Talmudic scholars interpret the commandment "Thou shall not kill," to mean that a Jew is proscribed only from killing another Jew. Non-jews, on the other hand, are fair game and can be killed like animals. The rest of the Mosaic law is interpreted likewise concerning treatment of non-Jews, according the Shahak's book.
Unbeknownst to most Americans, the key judges who have overseen the most important 9-11 lawsuits and Michael Chertoff, the Asst. Attorney General who directed the non-investigation of 9-11, are all members of this racist and un-American religious sect. They, like the other key officials involved in the 9-11 conspiracy, were all raised and educated in this tradition.
The judges, officials, and advisors involved at every critical point of the 9-11 conspiracy and cover-up are all Jewish Zionists dedicated to the State of Israel. This is how Zionist agents have been able to cover up the truth of what really happened on 9-11.
The Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun is a Zionist synagogue, according to its mission statement. It defines itself as a "modern Orthodox" synagogue, which is "deeply committed" to "an unbreakable bond with the State of Israel and its citizens."
The orthodox branch of Judaism is a minority sect making up about 10 percent of American Jews. This minority sect, however, wields immense power in the government and courts of the United States.
The Kehilath Jeshurun congregation has a long history of shaping the Zionist agenda. In the 1920s, for example, it hosted orthodox Zionist conferences where plans were discussed to bring all the Jews of Russia to the southwestern United States. "Our identification with the State of Israel and our fellow Jews extends well beyond the more conventional UJA/Federation, Israel Bonds and tree-planting campaigns," the congregation's mission statement says – and indeed it does.
The Kehilath Jeshurun congregation acts as an agency of Israel on the Upper East Side of Manhattan and some of its members occupy positions of power within the government of the United States. The "modern" orthodox congregation also has a long history of calling for segregation and separation of Jews from Christians and Christian influences in the community. Like other orthodox Jews, the congregation is opposed to Reform Judaism, the largest branch of Judaism. Orthodox religious expression is the only form of Judaism that is recognized by the State of Israel.
As a religious sect based on race, intermarriage between Jews and Christians is anathema to orthodox Jews like Chertoff, Hellerstein, and Mukasey.
Like most Zionists, the parents or grandparents of Chertoff, Hellerstein, and Mukasey are from the largely uncivilized frontier region between the Russian and German spheres of influence known as the Pale of Settlement. The Pale of Settlement refers to the expanse that reaches from Lithuania to the Black Sea, a region between Prussia and the Russian Empire of Catherine the Great, who created the Pale in 1791. The Pale existed until 1917 and is occupied today by Ukraine, Poland, Belarus, and Lithuania.
The areas around Brest-Litovsk, Grodno, and Bialystok had large concentrations of Jews and were hotbeds of Zionist activity in the late 1800s. Jews outnumbered Christians in some of the towns, such as Grodno, an old Lithuanian city. When Catherine the Great annexed this western region, she banned the Jews who lived there from coming to Russia. These Jews were primarily descendents of the displaced Khazars who had converted to Judaism in the 8th Century.
In the Pale of Settlement, the Khazar Jews, generally referred to as Ashkenazi, usually lived in communities separated from the non-Jewish people they lived among.
Michael Bernard Mukasey and his wife are members of Kehilath Jeshurun, the orthodox synagogue that is connected to the Ramaz yeshiva. The Ramaz School was started in 1937 by Rabbi Joseph H. Lookstein.
Lookstein served concurrently as principal of the Ramaz School in New York and as president and chancellor of Bar-Ilan University in Israel, where he was chancellor from 1958 to 1979. This illustrates the intense Zionist character of the Ramaz school and synagogue.
Mukasey attended the Ramaz School and graduated in 1959. His wife, the former Susan Bernstock Saroff, was a teacher and headmistress of the Ramaz Lower School. Both of Susan's children, who were adopted by Mukasey, attended the Ramaz yeshiva.
Mukasey, the nominee for attorney general, attended the Ramaz yeshiva and reportedly "remains heavily involved in that community." That "community" would be the orthodox, Zionist, and Israeli community of Manhattan.
In 1948, according to the Ramaz school's website, children of Israeli diplomats on "special missions" began enrolling in the Ramaz School. These Israeli students attended Ramaz with Mukasey, who speaks Hebrew.
Isaac Herzog, the son of Chaim Herzog, the former president of Israel and head of the Israeli military intelligence, attended the Ramaz school in the 1970s. Isaac Herzog was government secretary under Ehud Barak and is currently a minister in the Israeli government.
Mukasey will be the second Jewish attorney general, if confirmed. Ed Levi, who served under President Gerald Ford was the first. Mukasey was nominated as a federal judge in New York in 1987 by President Ronald Reagan and became the chief judge in 2000.
Mukasey was elevated to Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, succeeding Judge Thomas P. Griesa, on March 12, 2000. Mukasey remained in this position until August 1, 2006. As chief judge for New York City, Mukasey was well placed to control the entire legal process concerning 9-11.
"From 1967 to 1972, Mukasey was in private practice, where his clients ranged from right-wing lawyer Roy Cohn to the Daily News," the newspaper reported. "He then switched sides and joined the Manhattan prosecutor's office, where he forged a life-long friendship with future Mayor Rudy Giuliani."
In an article entitled "Local Rabbi Thinks Michael Mukasey Perfect for AG Job," the Daily News reported that after President Bush announced his intention to nominate Mukasey, the FBI called on his rabbi in Manhattan.
"Rabbi Haskel Lookstein said the G-men wanted to know if there was anything in the 66-year-old judge's background that could scuttle his nomination," the Daily News reported. Lookstein reportedly told the agents that Mukasey was "a mensch."
"There's nothing wrong with him," the rabbi said. "He's as close to perfect as you can be. And that's the way he was at 15."
Very little is known about Mukasey's family background. There are very few articles that mention the name Mukasey prior to 1960. The Mukasey name is a Jewish surname from a place named Lachowicze, in the region of Brest.
Judge Mukasey's wife was the headmistress of the Ramaz Lower School in the 1990s when he was handling the case of the first "false flag" terror bombing of the World Trade Center. This case was primarily meant to prepare public opinion for what was planned for 9-11.
At the beginning of the trial of Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, the sheik's lawyers filed a motion requesting Mukasey recuse himself from the trial. The motion argued that Mukasey's allegiance to Israel created a bias against the Muslim defendants. Mukasey dismissed the motion as "utterly irrelevant."
"A strongly-biased Zionist judge," is how Dr. Edward W. Miller described Mukasey in his 1997 article about the trial of the blind sheik. "Mukasey is a committed Zionist, a long-time supporter of Israel," Miller wrote. "His wife is also a Zionist."
"Sheik Rahman was denied the lawyer of his choice by Judge Mukasey, and when he asked the court to permit an expert to explain the practices of Islam to an ignorant American jury, he was refused this due process. Eventually, on January 17, 1996, Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman was sentenced by a Jewish judge of strong Zionist leanings to imprisonment for life plus 65 years."
"After receiving his lifetime sentence," Miller wrote, "this elderly, sick and blind sheik, standing before the Jewish judge, spoke quietly and at length in Arabic. "He pointed out the on-going 'historical junction' at which 'the spiritual power of Islam was confronting the military/material juggernaut of a Zionist White House.'
"Sheik Rahman continued, debunking the prosecution's theory that he heads an international terrorist organization. He emphasized that he was sequestered in a jail in Cairo in the early 1980s at the time the so-called 'international terrorist group' was allegedly being formed.
"Judge Michael Mukasey was visibly irritated by the Sheik's remarks, and interrupted the scholarly cleric repeatedly and rudely, finally remarking that 'religion has nothing to do with the case.'
Source: Miller, Edward W., "A Political Prisoner In the U.S.: Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman," The Coastal Post, March, 1997
A lawyer who tried a case before Mukasey described him as "Dour and condescending; imperious and egotistic."
"I seriously doubt whether he has the 'people skills' that the DOJ needs in a new AG," the attorney said.
Alvin K. Hellerstein, who has presided over all the 9-11 cases brought by victims and relatives of victims, is also a trustee and sponsor of the Ramaz School on the Upper East Side, where his children also studied.
Hellerstein has been president of the Board of Jewish Education of Greater New York and serves on a taskforce for the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance, which addresses the needs of Orthodox Jewish women who want a divorce.
Hellerstein's wife, Mildred, and Audrey Lookstein, the wife of the rabbi of Kehilath Jeshrun, are Zionist colleagues and senior officers of an Israeli organization named AMIT. Mildred Hellerstein is listed as being a National Treasurer of AMIT, an organization dedicated to fostering "religious values and Zionist ideals" in the Israeli children in its schools and programs in Israel. Lookstein has been vice president of AMIT several times and was chair of AMIT's national board of directors in 2006.
Tevi David Troy (formerly Troyansky), Deputy Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Service, is another graduate of the Ramaz School. Troy was the policy director for Sen. John Ashcroft (R-MO) in the late 1990s before he was appointed to be Bush's first Attorney General, an appointment Troy enthusiastically supported in his article "My Boss the Fanatic" published in the New Republic. Ashcroft now has a consulting business and earns much of his money by representing Israeli military companies. In 2006, Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) was reported to be a major client of the Ashcroft Group, LLC.
Prior to his May 2007 appointment as Deputy Secretary of the DHHS, Troy was Deputy Assistant to the President George W. Bush for Domestic Policy. In August 2003, Troy was appointed to serve at the White House as Deputy Cabinet Secretary and Liaison to the Jewish community. An orthodox Jew, Troy is the son of Elaine Gerson Troy and Bernard Dov Troy, the former "Executive Director of the Jewish Educators' Assembly in Manhattan." Troy is the grandson of Thomas and Pauline Troyansky, Russian Jewish immigrants who came to the United States in the early 1900s.
He is married to Kami J. Pliskow, the daughter of Dr. Raymond and Vita Pliskow of Tacoma, Washington. Raymond studied medicine at the University of Michigan. The Pliskow family, a Russian Jewish family that immigrated to the U.S. in the early 1900s has its own interesting history of terrorism. Barbara Pliskow, a former instructor in psychology at Wayne State University in Detroit, attempted to hijack an American Airlines Boeing 727 on September 24, 1971 armed with a gun, dynamite, and other explosives. She was reportedly attempting to hijack the flight on behalf of the "Black Liberation Army" to free imprisoned members of the Black Panther Party.
Pliskow was charged with the capital offense of attemped piracy of an airliner. Because the engines of the plane had not been started, however, Pliskow was not prosecuted under the federal skyjacking statue.

An American Holocaust

September 25, 2007

The thousands of lives lost in the destruction of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were innocent victims of a holocaust.
The word 'holocaust' derives from the Greek words holos (completely) and kaustos (burned sacrificial offering) meaning complete destruction by fire. The correct usage and meaning of this word, however, have been distorted by Zionist propagandists, who have sought to trademark the word as a proper noun to signify the loss of Jewish lives in World War II.
"Totality of destruction has been central to the meaning of holocaust since it first appeared in Middle English in the 14th century, used in reference to the biblical sacrifice in which a male animal was wholly burnt on the altar in worship of God," The American Heritage Dictionary says about the word's history.
Holocaust means complete destruction by fire with extensive loss of life as it comes from the Greek holokauston, which means "that which is completely burnt."
"Holocaust has a secure place in the language when it refers to the massive destruction of humans by other humans," according to the American Heritage Dictionary's note on usage.
I personally know of several actual holocausts in modern times in which there were "massive destruction of humans" by fire caused by other humans: the fire-bombing of German and Japanese cities, most notably Dresden on February 13-14, 1945; the massacre of the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas, on April 19, 1993; and the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
The entire center of Dresden, the beautiful Saxon capital, was completely consumed by fire on Ash Wednesday 1945 after the Anglo-American fire bombing raids of February 13 and 14, 1945. According to August Kuklane, an eyewitness, some 600,000 people, including many thousands of refugees, had been living in the city center that was incinerated as they slept.
The U.S. mass media does not use the term "holocaust" to refer to the destruction of thousands of lives by fire in the World Trade Center because the word has been usurped by Zionist propagandists. The controlled media in the United States also completely avoids discussing the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of the 9-11 holocaust.
Although it is extremely unpleasant to contemplate, it must be remembered that hundreds of innocent Americans and other people were literally roasted alive in the upper floors of the twin towers before they collapsed. Besides the fires that were caused by the airplane fuel, there is evidence that there were large amounts of Thermite involved in the destruction of the three collapsed towers. Many people chose to jump from the 110-story towers rather than die from the extreme heat they were subjected to.

Tons of extremely hot (about 1,500 degrees C.) molten iron cascaded from the 81st floor of the South Tower before it was demolished.  If this molten iron was produced by a thermitic reaction, that reaction would have produced temperatures of about 2,500 C.  The heat from this reaction was literally cooking the people who were trapped in the floors above the crash zone, which is why so many jumped to their deaths.
The Sunday Herald of Glasgow, Scotland, and Neil Mackay, Scotland's News Journalist of the Year for 2002, could teach American newspapermen something about journalism and what a "free press" really looks like. Mackay wrote an excellent article about the abundance of evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of 9-11. Mackay's piece was published in the Sunday Herald on November 2, 2003:
There was ruin and terror in Manhattan, but, over the Hudson River in New Jersey, a handful of men were dancing. As the World Trade Centre burned and crumpled, the five men celebrated and filmed the worst atrocity ever committed on American soil as it played out before their eyes.
Who do you think they were? Palestinians? Saudis? Iraqis, even? Al-Qaeda, surely? Wrong on all counts. They were Israelis – and at least two of them were Israeli intelligence agents, working for Mossad, the equivalent of MI6 or the CIA.
Their discovery and arrest that morning is a matter of indisputable fact. To those who have investigated just what the Israelis were up to that day, the case raises one dreadful possibility: that Israeli intelligence had been shadowing the al-Qaeda hijackers as they moved from the Middle East through Europe and into America where they trained as pilots and prepared to suicide-bomb the symbolic heart of the United States. And the motive? To bind America in blood and mutual suffering to the Israeli cause.
After being detained for two months, the five Israeli intelligence agents were returned to Israel on "visa violations." In Israel, three of the men discussed what they had been through on an Israeli television talk show, where Oded Ellner made this revealing comment: "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event.”

Mossad operative Oded Ellner (lower row, center) admitted on television that the Israelis' "purpose was to document the event." The Kurzberg brothers who were in charge of the group (right, top and bottom), Mossad agents known to U.S. law enforcement, sat in the audience during the show so that the three operatives could deny on air that they were "agents of the Mossad."
Mackay asks the question U.S. journalists are afraid to even think: But how can you document an event unless you know it is going to happen? "Put together," Mackay concluded, "the facts do appear to indicate that Israel knew that 9-11, or at least a large-scale terror attack, was about to take place on American soil, but did nothing to warn the USA."
The controlled media in the United States avoids the facts of Israeli prior knowledge because it is evidence of Israeli involvement in the terror attacks of 9-11. This is obviously a taboo subject in the Zionist-controlled media. The facts, however, indicate that many Israelis knew that 9-11 would take place. Warnings conveyed on the Israeli-owned Odigo instant messaging system two hours before the attacks were precise to the minute.
Odigo, a company partly-owned and financed by the Israeli criminal Kobi Alexander, had its U.S. headquarters only two blocks from the World Trade Center, yet Odigo failed to pass the warning it had received on to the authorities in New York, a move that would have saved thousands of lives. Two weeks after 9-11, Alex Diamandis, Odigo's vice president, said, "The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did – almost to the minute."
The Washington Post briefly reported about the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge on October 4, 2001 on page A-24:
Another possible hint of the plot came two hours before planes crashed into the World Trade Center, when two employees of Odigo Inc. in Herzliya, Israel, received electronic instant messages declaring that some sort of attack was about to take place. The notes ended with an anti-Semitic slur.  
"The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did -- almost to the minute," said Alex Diamandis, vice president of sales for the high-tech company, which also has offices in Lower Manhattan. He said the employees did not know the person who sent the message, but they traced it to a computer address and have given that information to the FBI.
What is most striking about the media censorship of the Odigo (Comverse) story of prior knowledge of 9-11 is that it was never reported in any of the New York newspapers. The New York Times only published two articles in which it discussed the five dancing Israelis.
The first, "5 Young Israelis, Caught in Net of Suspicion" was published on October 8, 2001 on page F-3. The article suggests that the five Israeli agents were completely innocent:
By some accounts, they seemed to be making light of the tragic situation.
Besides the cash [$4,700 in the socks] and the [multiple] passports, one man had fresh pictures of the smoldering wreckage of the trade center in his camera, images he had captured by standing rather conspicuously on the room of the van.
The Times article names the five Israelis: Oded Ellner, Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, and the brothers Paul and Sivan Kurzberg. The article contains an interesting choice of words used by Yigal Tzarfati, an Israeli consul in New York, who referred to the World Trade Center attacks as "bombings": "This is a huge misunderstanding," Tzarfati told the Times. The five Israeli agents "have nothing to do with the bombings."
On November 21, 2001, the New York Times published its second article about the five Israelis in a piece titled "Dozens of Israeli Jews Are Being Kept in Federal Detention." The article by Tamar Lewin and Alison Cowan was published on the day the last two Israeli Mossad agents were returned to Israel and appeared on page B-7:
In New York, immigration officials began deporting five young Israeli moving men who have been in federal custody since Sept. 11. Two of the deportees, Oded Ellner and Omer Gavriel Marmari, landed in Tel Aviv yesterday. The others, Paul Kurzberg and his brother Sivan, and Yaron Shmuel, were expected to fly to Israel today.
The five aroused attention in New Jersey after people noticed them going to unusual lengths to photograph the World Trade Center ruins and making light of the situation. One photograph developed by the F.B.I. showed Sivan Kurzberg holding a lighted lighter in the foreground, with the smoldering wreckage in the background, said Steven Noah Gordon, a lawyer for the five.
As objectionable as their behavior may be, Mr. Gordon said of their long incarceration, ''It's not a crime and they were being treated as if it was.''
The five were asked to take polygraph tests before being allowed to leave. But Paul Kurzberg refused on principle to divulge much about his role in the Israeli army or subsequently working for people who may have had ties to Israeli intelligence, Mr. Gordon said. His client had trouble with one seven-hour polygraph test administered last week, but did better on a second try.
The Forward, New York City's leading Jewish newsapaper, reported on March 15, 2002 that the five Israelis had been on "a Mossad surveillance mission" and their fake moving company was just a "front":
According to one former high-ranking American intelligence official, who asked not to be named, the FBI came to the conclusion at the end of its investigation that the five Israelis arrested in New Jersey last September were conducting a Mossad surveillance mission and that their employer, Urban Moving Systems of Weehawken, N.J., served as a front.
After their arrest, the men were held in detention for two-and-a-half months and were deported at the end of November, officially for visa violations.
However, a counterintelligence investigation by the FBI concluded that at least two of them were in fact Mossad operatives, according to the former American official, who said he was regularly briefed on the investigation by two separate law enforcement officials.
"The assessment was that Urban Moving Systems was a front for the Mossad and operatives employed by it," he said. "The conclusion of the FBI was that they were spying on local Arabs but that they could leave because they did not know anything about 9-11."
However, he added, the bureau was "very irritated because it was a case of so-called unilateral espionage, meaning they didn't know about it."
Spokesmen for the FBI, the Justice Department and the Immigration and Naturalization Service refused to discuss the case. Israeli officials flatly dismissed the allegations as untrue.
However, the former American official said that after American authorities confronted Jerusalem on the issue at the end of last year, the Israeli government acknowledged the operation and apologized for not coordinating it with Washington.
In the days after the attack, an employee who worked at the Mossad-front company, Urban Moving Systems, told the Record (Bergen, New Jersey) that the Israelis "were joking" about the holocaust that had just occurred within eyesight of their office across the river from the World Trade Center:
An employee of Urban Moving Systems, who would not give his name, said the majority of his co-workers are Israelis and were joking on the day of the attacks.  
"I was in tears," the man said. "These guys were joking and that bothered me. These guys were like, 'Now America knows what we go through.'"

The Final Phase of the 9-11 Cover-Up

September 27, 2007

The 9-11 litigation process is approaching the final phase of the Zionist-run cover-up of what really happened on September 11, 2001. Six years after the worst terrorist atrocity in U.S. history, not a single lawsuit filed by the relatives of the 9-11 victims has gone to trial. With only 21 cases remaining, it appears increasingly likely that the book may be closed on the 9-11 litigation without a single case ever being heard in court.
There are two recent news items that indicate that the walling up of the truth is nearly complete. There are just a few remaining bricks left to be put into place - about 21 to be precise - and the walling up of the truth will be finished.
The first news item, from September 18, is that 14 of the 35 remaining suits filed by relatives of 9-11 victims, seeking compensation from the airlines and the foreign-owned airport security contractors, were settled out-of-court one week before the first case was to go to trial. The first trial was to start on Monday, September 24 but that case was among those settled. The next trial is scheduled to begin on November 5.
It should be noted that this will not be a 9-11 trial in which any liability or accountability will be determined. In an unusual reversal of legal procedure, U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has ordered that six trials for damages take place before any trial for liability.
Photo: Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, an Orthodox Jew
and devotee of the State of Israel, oversees all 9-11 litigation. 
Judge Hellerstein, who oversees all 9-11 litigation, has done this, he says, in the hope that both sides may use the damage figures as a road map toward settlement. Only 21 cases remain of the original 95 cases filed in federal court. The rest have all been settled or dismissed. "The rush of settlements leaves open the question of whether any trials will take place," the New York Times reported on September 19, 2007.
The second news item, from September 22, is that the lawsuits filed by some 300 workers allegedly sickened from working at Ground Zero will not be heard in New York state courts but will also be moved to the federal court of Alvin K. Hellerstein.
The state's Appellate Division ruled that all claims tied to injury, death or loss of property from the 9-11 attacks fall under the jurisdiction of Manhattan federal court. This is considered by many to be an incorrect ruling because the worker lawsuits are not against the airlines or the airport security companies, which were relegated to Hellerstein. These "sick workers" cases are against the City of New York, which is clearly not within the judicial purview of the federal mandate of Judge Hellerstein.
This is an unfair ruling which corrals all the workers' lawsuits into Hellerstein's courtroom. This ruling overturned a decision by a Manhattan Supreme Court judge, who had allowed the workers' bids for litigation to proceed in state court.
Close to 9,000 lawsuits by workers whose health was affected by working at Ground Zero had already reportedly been filed. These developments reveal how the relatives of those killed on 9-11 have been effectively denied the discovery, justice, and accountability they have sought through litigation.
The law firm of Motley Rice represents all remaining families who lost loved ones aboard the airplanes involved in 9-11, according to firm's press release of September 24, 2007. Alicia Ward, director of communications for Motley Rice, confirmed this and the next court date of November 5.
"Several of our clients chose to settle after we reached the amount that they wanted and after we completed years of discovery and investigations that were more extensive and probing than even that completed by the U.S. government's 9-11 Commission," attorney Joseph F. Rice said. "We gave them answers and accountability which was denied them by the U.S. government's victim compensation program."
The terms of the settlement, however, bar families from discussing the details so it appears highly unlikely that the evidence obtained by the "extensive investigations" and "years of discovery" will ever become part of the public record.
Mike Low, whose 28-year-old daughter, Sara, a flight attendant on American Airlines Flight 11, told the New York Times that he was not deterred by the settlements.
Photo: Sara Elizabeth Low
"The frustrating thing is not having a trial date," he said. "The wheels of justice turn excruciatingly slow. It doesn’t change my mind any. My desire and goal is to try to find some answers. I want to know why Abdulaziz Alomari and Mohamed Atta were allowed to walk on planes in Portland, Me., with prohibited weapons. I want somebody to tell me why that happened."
By now, it should be evident that the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein is not likely to produce the answers the Mr. Low wants. Hellerstein's court is clearly part of the apparatus for concealing the truth of what really happened on 9-11. Why, for example, have individuals peripheral to the 9-11 crimes been put on trial while key suspects like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), the confessed "mastermind," are kept locked up in their cells in Guantanamo, Cuba? What kind of discovery is going on there?
If Hellerstein were truly interested in getting answers about how and why 9-11 happened wouldn't he request that KSM be brought to his courtroom in New York city? How can the "mastermind" of 9-11 not be part of the legal process that Hellerstein is overseeing? Why is this key suspect, the "mastermind" of 9-11, being protected?
To understand how a small group of dedicated individuals can conceal the truth of a huge crime it is necessary to know how the cover-up works. In a criminal cover-up, like that at work with 9-11, there are three main processes that need to be controlled:
1. The Investigation -- primarily the collection and confiscation of evidence;
2. The Interpretation -- how the event is explained by mass media and appointed official commissions;
3. The Prosecution and Litigation -- the handling of lawsuits pertaining to the crime.
It can be assumed that the people involved in the cover-up are connected to the perpetrators of the crime. In the case of 9-11, the people who controlled each and every one of these three key processes: investigation, interpretation, and prosecution, are Zionist Jews who share a dedication and loyalty to the State of Israel.
The fact that Zionists have played key roles in the covering-up of the truth of 9-11 suggests that the Israeli role in the crimes of 9-11 was much greater than most people realize. That is to say that the Israeli agents monitoring the Arab suspects were actually part of an operation that the Mossad was controlling.
"To those who have investigated just what the Israelis were up to that day, the case raises one dreadful possibility: that Israeli intelligence had been shadowing the al-Qaeda hijackers as they moved from the Middle East through Europe and into America where they trained as pilots and prepared to suicide-bomb the symbolic heart of the United States. And the motive? To bind America in blood and mutual suffering to the Israeli cause," Scotland's award-winning journalist Neil Mackay wrote in the Sunday Herald of November 2, 2003:
We are now deep in conspiracy theory territory. But there is more than a little circumstantial evidence to show that Mossad - whose motto is "By way of deception, thou shalt do war" - was spying on Arab extremists in the USA and may have known that September 11 was in the offing, yet decided to withhold vital information from their American counterparts which could have prevented the terror attacks.
Mackay's article concluded:
Certainly, it seems, Israel was spying within the borders of the United States and it is equally certain that the targets were Islamic extremists probably linked to September 11. But did Israel know in advance that the Twin Towers would be hit and the world plunged into a war without end; a war which would give Israel the power to strike its enemies almost without limit? That's a conspiracy theory too far, perhaps. But the unpleasant feeling that, in this age of spin and secrets, we do not know the full and unadulterated truth won't go away. Maybe we can guess, but it's for the history books to discover and decide.
I disagree with Mackay and others who say it is "for the history books to discover and decide." The evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of the attacks is well-documented and the names and roles of the key players in the Zionist cover-up are known. Understanding the foreign agenda and dual-nationals involved at every point of the cover-up is key to understanding who was truly behind the terrorist mass murder of 9-11.

The 9-11 Cover-Up: Italian Gangsters and Jewish Bosses

October 1, 2007

Michael B. Mukasey, the nominee to be the next attorney general, was the former chief judge of the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York until 2006. Mukasey first became a Federal district judge in Manhattan in 1987 after he was recommended to President Ronald Reagan by Senator Alfonse M. D'Amato.
Alfonse M. D'Amato was a very pro-Israel senator, although he had received 4 out of every 100 Jewish votes when he was first elected in 1980. Evidently, there were other, more powerful Zionist influences than "the Jewish vote" working on the Roman Catholic senator.
"D'Amato, who received only 4 percent of the Jewish vote in 1980, placed himself firmly in Israel's corner from the start," Tom Goldstein wrote in "D'Amato: At Home in the Senate" in the New York Times of February 18, 1983.
"The most important appointment a Senator influences are Federal judgeships, which are for life," Goldstein wrote. D'Amato influenced quite a few appointments of judges and prosecutors during his 18 years in the senate.
In the spring of 1993, the senator's brother Armand was tried on 24-counts of mail fraud after being part of a 1986-1988 bribery scheme in which he was paid some $120,000 by an executive at Unisys to buy influence with his brother, the senator. Unisys was lobbying the senator's brother to ensure that the U.S. military would buy their radar products, which they did.
When Armand was sentenced in November 1993, the senator's brother received the minimum possible sentence: 5 months in prison and five months in home detention. Armand planned to appeal and remained free on $10,000 bail when the New York Times reported on his sentencing on November 6, 1993.
Chertoff and Mukasey were working on the case against "the Blind Sheikh" and the first Zionist "false-flag" bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. Soon thereafter, Chertoff began working with Sen. D'Amato on the Whitewater Case against President Clinton and his wife, Hilary.
Photo: Sen. Alfonse D'Amato feeling the Zionist pressure. Michael Chertoff, with the all-knowing smile in the background, was special counsel for the Senate Whitewater Committee investigating allegations against the Clintons.
Judge Michael Bernard Mukasey had already been a district judge for 5 years when Rudolph W. Giuliani was elected mayor in 1994. Giuliani was the only child of Harold Giuliani, a man who had long-standing ties to organized crime in Brooklyn from the 1930s. Mayor Giuliani's father had served an 18-month prison term in Sing Sing for armed robbery in 1934. As Wayne Barrett wrote in his book "Rudy," the elder Giuliani had been an enforcer for his brother-in-law's loan-sharking operation.
In 2000, Giuliani admitted in a television interview that he had known about his father's criminal activity. "Some of it," the mayor said, "did come as a shock."
"I've driven myself crazy over this all my life," Giulani said. "And when any mistake has been made it really bothers me, and I realize more than I did as I was growing up why my father was doing that. I mean, he wanted to make sure that I didn't make the same mistakes that he believed he had made." (Source: "Giuliani Acknowledges Knowing of His Father's Criminal Activity," NYT, 10 August 2000)
But was the criminal history of Giuliani's family a shock to Michael Mukasey, the Orthodox Jew who was chief judge of the district court in Manhattan? It's hard to imagine that this was not known to the clerks and judges in the district court of Manhattan.
Was it news to Alvin K. Hellerstein, another Orthodox Jew who served as a district judge across the street from City Hall? Was it a surprise to Michael Chertoff, the Orthodox Jew who worked closely with Giuliani whom he had served under as an assistant prosecutor in the 1980s?
Photo: Michael Chertoff, with the Cheshire Cat smile in the middle, was an Asst. U.S. Attorney under Rudolph Giulani in the 1980s when Giuliani and Chertoff went after gangsters of the Italian sort.
I doubt if this news was a surprise to any of these three men. I suspect that these three men, all judges and prosecutors who usually worked across the street from City Hall, all knew about Giuliani's father's criminal record. In fact, I suspect that they used this knowledge to their advantage. I suspect that in the same way they used the greed and criminality of the D'Amato family to their benefit. This is how the U.S. government, which I call a "crimocracy" works. It is a government of criminals, by criminals, and for criminals. This is the source of the corruption which is responsible for the United States being in such dire straits.
Michael Mukasey, for one, seemed to have a public interest in the history of organized crime in New York City, at least as long as it was the criminality of an ethnic group other than his own, i.e. the Jewish Mafia. He even wrote articles about organized crime and reviewed books about the subject for the New York Times way back in 1971, when he was less than 30-years old.
The three men named above: Michael B. Mukasey, Alvin K. Hellerstein, and Michael Chertoff are all Zionist Jews who are dedicated to the State of Israel and connected in more ways than I can explain in this short article. These men are agents of a foreign state and the Zionist network that supports it. These men are quislings working with a hostile foreign entity that already has extensive control over the highest positions of power in the U.S. government, finance and media spheres. These men are striving to increase the Zionist control over the American people and government by protecting the lies and crimes of Zionist agents, especially those surrounding the events of 9-11.
These men have worked closely together on the Great World Trade Center Conspiracy, from the first bombing to the final destruction in 2001. Indeed, these men are still working closely together on the criminal cover-up of what really happened on 9-11. The U.S. media and public should be examining the actions they have taken to conceal the truth about 9-11. These men are part of a network of organized crime.  
Mukasey, the man who is nominated to be the next U.S. Attorney General (which would be a national disaster in my opinion), wrote the following lines as the first paragraphs of two articles that he wrote about organized crime. I appreciate the first quote because it seems very appropriate to what happened in my trial. The second quote is also quite apt - if we enlarge the meaning of "Mafia" to include Jewish organized criminal networks as well as Italian and Irish.
Michael B. Mukasey wrote:

The presumption of innocence – whether in criminal trials or politics – has never really caught on in this country. H.L. Mencken observed a generation ago that a criminal defendant is generally presumed guilty, a presumption that rises to the level of a certainty if he is acquitted.

However – Mencken's theory goes – if he is lucky enough to be convicted, a presumption immediately attaches that the conviction was unjust or dishonest, probably both.

Michael B. Mukasey, "The Last of the Big-Time Bosses", New York Times, Oct. 17, 1971
Mukasey also wrote:
Pascal taught that the first rule of morality, and thus of public discourse about it, is to think clearly. In that spirit, here are a few thoughts about organized crime: The Mafia exists. It is not the creation of novelists or journalists. It has exacted a toll in misery that would shame the Inquisition and a toll in treasure that would embarrass the Pentagon. It consists not of dashing Robin Hoods or buffoons but of willful, disciplined men who have too long burdened all of us.
Michael B. Mukasey, "In Defense of a Vigorous U.S. Attorney", New York Times, Dec. 2, 1985
I agree with Pascal. We must "think clearly" about the "false-flag" terror attacks of 9-11 and identify who is really behind the criminal cover-up of the truth. Our nation needs us to think clearly, indeed, our future depends on our ability to think clearly.
It is clearly not Islamic terrorists who are behind the confiscation of the evidence of 9-11 and hiding the truth from the American people. Nor is it President Bush and his medicated cronies in the government. The only people who can be hiding the truth are those who have controlled the investigation, the evidence, and the litigation surrounding 9-11. It can only be Messrs Chertoff, Hellerstein and Mukasey - and their Zionist partners in crime.
Mukasey and his Zionist cronies are the ones who need to be investigated. Making Mukasey the attorney general of the United States would be a mistake with serious and severe long-term consequences for the American people.

Mayor Giuliani, Senator D'Amato & Israeli Intelligence

October 5, 2007

Senator Alfonse M. D'Amato and the former mayor of New York City, Rudolph W. Giuliani, are on the U.S. National Advisory Board of an organization that is closely tied to Israeli military intelligence, the America-Israel Friendship League (AIFL). The President & Chairman of the U.S. Board of this organization is Kenneth J. Bialkin.
"The AIFL is the only non-sectarian national organization that promotes the relationship between the people of the U.S. and the people of Israel on a grassroots level," Bialkin says on AIFL's website.
The other members of the U.S. National Advisory Board of AIFL are: Sen. Max Baucus, John Brademas, Kenneth Duberstein, Lawrence Eagleburger, Rep. Benjamin A. Gilman, William H. Gray, III, Vernon Jordan, Henry Kissinger, George P. Shultz, and Elie Wiesel. The AIFL describes its mission as "Building friendship based on common values."
The America-Israel Friendship League describes itself as "a non-sectarian, non-political, not-for-profit organization strengthening ties between the people of the United States and Israel." The Israeli deputy chairman is a man named Rothschild: Major General Danny Rothschild, a former head of Israeli military intelligence and coordinator of government activities in the occupied territories.
Photo: Israeli Maj. Gen. Danny Rothschild
Rothschild, who owns and runs an Israeli-based security company called Netacs (Security) Ltd., was the former head of the Israeli military's intelligence research branch. Netacs does something called "Airport Risk Analysis and implementation projects" at 9 major airports in the United States, according to its website. Americans beware.
According to the website of Netacs, "the owners and executives of Netacs Group" are described thusly:
D. Rothschild, Major General (Res.)
Mr. Rothschild served most of his military service in the intelligence corps. Notable positions were Assistant to the Chief Of Staff of Israeli Defense Forces, Commander of S. Lebanon, Deputy Director of Military Intelligence & Chief of Intelligence Research and Analysis.
G. Zohar, Brigadier General (Res.)
Mr. Zohar served most of his tenure in the Intelligence Corps. Notable position: Head of Anti-terror Research and Operation.
S. Ettinger , Colonel (Res.)
Mr. Ettinger served in elite combat units in field & command positions. Later served in the Intelligence Corps.
Kenneth J. Bialkin is a partner in the law firm of Skadden Arps. Among other positions, besides being the chair of AIFL since 1996, Bialkin is or was the chairman of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (1982-1986), the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations (1984-1986), the American Jewish Historical Society (2003-Present), and is the president of the American Jewish Historical Society (1998-Present).
Photo: Kenneth J. Bialkin
Fighting for Israel in America
"As leader of the most powerful Jewish organizations in the world, Bialkin has fought and presented Israel's case to American presidents, world leaders, to the media, to American Jewry and to Muslims," Lifestyles wrote about Bialkin in May 2004. "He is friends with Israeli and American politicians and with Israeli prime ministers who often ask for his advice."
Bialkin comments in his interview with Lifestyles indicate that he does not believe that Jews should assimilate into the American population:
Bialkin says that he has signed on to pursue his Jewish identity because he believes in it, he is proud of it and because he is forced to. "If there were no antisemitism and no attacks against us and Israel, if we were not singled out maybe I'd be an assimilationist," he says. "But forces have made me conscious of my responsibilities. We are an honorable people with honorable traditions. We have a right to seek our betterment. Anyone who gets in my way is depriving me of something to which I'm entitled to…If I'm a laborer in the vineyard of Jewish liberation, it is because the enemy has forced me to do that."
Bialkin is a partner in a law firm with the "special mediator" of the 9-11 litigation. There are currently fewer than 2 dozen cases left to be settled. If the cases are all settled in out-of-court settlements there will be no cases to try. This would mean that the 9-11 catastrophe would never be examined in an open and public trial on behalf of any of the victims or their relatives.
Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who oversees all the 9-11 litigation has long been pressing the lawyers to settle the cases. The June 8, 2006 conference revealed how Hellerstein put pressure on the lawyers to settle their cases out of court. I wrote about the judge's pressure to settle in July 2006:
In many of the wrongful death cases, such as that of Mrs. Mariani, the first 9-11 lawsuit, the plaintiffs rejected the compensation fund provided by the U.S. government in the hope that they would obtain truth and justice through the courts.
"Why aren't you settling your cases?" Hellerstein asked Donald A. Migliori, attorney for plaintiffs with the law firm Motley Rice. "You're not working hard enough," Hellerstein said. "Ms. Birnbaum [special mediator] tells me she is getting no response from you."
Photo: 9-11 "Special Mediator" Sheila Birnbaum
Sheila Birnbaum is the court-appointed special mediator who is a lawyer from the law firm of Skadden Arps, which is a firm with very close ties to the state of Israel and insurance companies. One of the partners of Skadden Arps is Kenneth Bialkin, a former national chairman of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai Brith, a key Zionist organization. Bialkin is also a director or former director of some of the key insurance companies involved in 9-11 litigation.
Senator D'Amato was involved in a criminal bribery scandal with his brother and an executive of Unisys in the late 1980s. The system that a Unisys executive named Charles Gardner was paying D'Amato's brother to influence the senator to buy is part of the Aegis system. Gardner had been involved with the Aegis components produced in Great Neck, New York.
"Unisys, a supplier to the Pentagon of computer-information systems, obtained the Aegis contract, valued at about $100 million, from the Navy in April 1988."
Great Neck is a very Jewish area, which some Jews call a "shtetl." Shalom Yoran, the former head of Israel Aircraft Industry and founder of the Israeli Air Force, 1948-1954, lives in Great Neck. He was president of the Bedek Division, which oversees Israeli military aviation, when he retired at age 50 and came to Great Neck in September 1979.
The Aegis system was involved in the shooting down of the Iranian airliner. On 3 July 1988, Vincennes, under the command of Captain William C. Rogers III, shot down an Iran Air Airbus A300B2 over the Strait of Hormuz, killing all 290 aboard.
Photo: USS Vincennes 
Is it just a coincidence that the former president of Israel Aircraft Industry and Aegis come from the same small town on Long Island? Perhaps - but it is a coincidence worth investigating.

Is 9-11 Judge Working for Israel?

October 23, 2007

Alvin K. Hellerstein is the federal judge in the U.S. courthouse in Manhattan who is responsible for all wrongful death and personal injury cases filed by families of Sept. 11 victims.
Hellerstein was born in New York in 1933. Hellerstein graduated from Columbia College in 1954 and received his law degree from Columbia Law School in 1956. He was nominated by William J. Clinton on May 15, 1998 and confirmed by the Senate on October 21, 1998. Today, he controls all 9-11 victims' cases, as well as the lawsuits filed by the thousands of New York City workers who became seriously ill or died as a result of their exposure to the smoking rubble.
More than 6 years after 9-11, not one victim's case has gone to trial. Hellerstein has done everything under the sun to prevent a liability trial from occurring. In a most unusual move, for example, the first trials to be heard are only damages trial to determine the amount of compensation rather than to determine liability for the crime of the century.
Now, Hellerstein is tightly restricting the evidence that the plaintiffs may present at the first trial, as reported in the New York Times on October 18, 2007. Hellerstein ruled "that he would exclude some of the plaintiffs’ more sensational and speculative evidence" in the trial, which is to begin on November 5. Hellerstein's ruling "was a blow for plaintiffs in this and possibly other wrongful death cases stemming from the attacks, and could accelerate the pace of settlements," the Times reported.
Joseph Wayland, a lawyer for the airlines, told the Times that only 12 wrongful death cases remained.
In the first damages trial, the Ambrose case, Hellerstein ruled that the jury would not be allowed to see photographs of at least one of the hijackers and Dr. Ambrose separately passing through a security checkpoint at Dulles International Airport, where Dr. Ambrose's flight originated. The victim, Dr. Paul Wesley Ambrose, died aboard American Airlines Flight 77. His parents have sued the airline, airport security companies, and others, arguing that the attacks could have been foreseen and their son’s death averted.
“It’s a very, very limited inquiry, and the judge is trying to make sure that liability issues and other matters that might distract the jury from the limited issue before them are kept out,” Wayland said. Excluding evidence and keeping the inquiry "very limited" is what the process overseen by Hellerstein has been doing for the past six years, since the 9-11 litigation began.
In the 9-11 litigation, Judge Hellerstein has a very serious conflict of interest, which the New York and national newspapers should investigate. Hellerstein is a dedicated Zionist with deep and long-standing family ties with the State of Israel.
A key defendant in the 9-11 litigation is Huntleigh USA, the airline security and passenger screening company that was responsible for the passengers that boarded the flights at Boston and Newark. Huntleigh USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ICTS, an Israeli company owned and operated by senior officers of the Mossad.
Judge Hellerstein's wife is a devoted Zionist and his late sister Helene Mulhall left the United States to immigrate or "ascend" to Israel, as it is called in Hebrew ("aliyah"). AMIT, the Zionist organization Mrs. Hellerstein is a senior officer of, placed a death notice for Helene in the New York Times on October 23, 1998, which said: "Helene Mulhall lived a varied life, and through her personal Aliyah demonstrated her love for the people and State of Israel." Aliyah means to "ascend" to Israel. The Hebrew term for to leave Israel means "to go down" - to the rest of the world.
Other Hellerstein family members have lived and died in Palestine since the early 1900s. The family of Alvin K. Hellerstein is clearly devoted to the Zionist state.
There is one document about Alvin K. Hellerstein that suggests that he has been working with the Israeli state since the mid-1950s. Because of the urgency of the 9-11 litigation, I am presenting this document with these comments. In the summer of 1956, as the Suez Crisis developed between Egypt and Israel, Hellerstein flew from Mexico City to New York with a plane load of New York Jews and a man named Sylvio Francis Damato.
The 1940s and 50s was a time when Mexico City was one of the key points through which U.S. military contraband and airplanes were sent to Israel – in violation of U.S. law. One of the key players in this weapons and airplane smuggling was a man named Hank Greenspun, whose son Brian was one of Bill Clinton's best friends.
Photo: Zionist Weapons Smuggler "Hank" Greenspun 
As the PBS biography of Herman "Hank" Milton Greenspun (1909-1989) says in its Las Vegas series: "In March 1947, when he was 34, Greenspun was hired by Ben "Bugsy" Siegel to help churn out hype for the reopening of Siegel's Flamingo Hotel. Greenspun needed the money and Siegel desperately needed the positive press." Greenspun worked for the Jewish mobster "Bugsy" Siegel until he was murdered.
Photo: Jewish Mobster "Bugsy" Siegel
A few months after Siegel's death, PBS reported, Greenspun became involved in the Jewish organization Haganah and purchased weapons from around the world and smuggled them to Palestine.
In 1947, with Zionist forces short of weapons, Greenspun bought and stole machine guns and airplane parts in Hawaii and accompanied them through Mexico to ship to Zionist forces in Palestine. As a Zionist weapons smuggler, Greenspun worked closely with other Jewish syndicate criminals in the United States at the time, notably Teddy Kollek, Yehuda Artzi, and Adolph W. Schwimmer.
Teddy Kollek raised money to buy weapons from his office in the Syndicate-run Copacabana Club in New York City. In one day in 1948, Kollek raised a million dollars in Mexico City to buy airplanes, according to his January 2, 2007 obituary in the New York Times. "There was a ban on arms exports to Israel, so dismantled airplanes, for example, were shipped as prefabricated houses."
Photo: Brian Greenspun 
At the behest of his good friend Brian Greenspun, President Bill Clinton pardoned Al Schwimmer along with a host of other Jewish criminals before leaving office.
Photo: Bill Clinton, Michael Jordan, and Brian Greenspun
The 23-year-old Alvin K. Hellerstein traveled from Mexico City in August 1956 when the Suez Crisis was getting very hot and at a time when U.S. weapons sales to Israel were banned. Given the fact that the Israelis used Mexico City for all kinds of illegal shipments of weapons and drugs, and seeing that Hellerstein is doing everything possible to protect the Israeli defendants in the 9-11 litigation, it is fair to ask: What was Alvin Hellerstein doing in the summer of 1956 and exactly what are his ties to the State of Israel?

Michael Chertoff's Childhood in Israel

October 26, 2007

When the Israeli national Michael Chertoff, became the new head of the Department of Homeland Security in February 2005, I wrote an article in which criticized the U.S. Senate and controlled press for not addressing the fact that he is an Israeli national.
Michael Chertoff, an Israeli national through his mother - the first El Al hostess and Mossad agent, is Secretary of Homeland Security and was the Asst. Attorney General responsible for the Criminal Division of the Dept. of Justice from 2001 to 2003.
"On February 15, 2005, Michael Chertoff, an apparent dual national with Israeli roots, was sworn in as the second Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The new 'homeland security czar,' who oversees the U.S. Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, seems to be hiding his own dual-national status - with the cooperation of the controlled press," I wrote at the time.
It is absolutely outrageous that a foreign national should be in charge of U.S. "Homeland Security." The fact that Chertoff's mother was the first hostess on El Al and involved in secret Mossad missions is all the more troubling.
Michael Chertoff, as Asst. Attorney General of the United States in charge of the Criminal Division of the Dept. of Justice, personally supervised and controlled the entire FBI non-investigation of 9-11. Chertoff is the responsible person for the obstruction of justice and blocking access to the evidence since September 11, 2001.
Chertoff is the co-author, along with Viet Dinh, of the USA PATRIOT Act, signed into law on October 26, 2001. As head of the Justice Department's criminal division, he advised the Central Intelligence Agency on the legality of torture techniques in coercive interrogation sessions.
From 2001 to 2003, he headed the criminal division of the Department of Justice, leading the prosecution against terrorist suspect Zacarias Moussaoui. In this role, Chertoff was central in creating the 9-11 myth by providing the list of the 19 Arab suspects and supervising the FBI's confiscation of evidence and the non-investigation of 9-11. Why have the American people tolerated this Israeli corruption of the 9-11 investigation? When will it end?
Photo: Robert S. Mueller, III
Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
September 4, 2001- Present
Robert S. Mueller, for example, only became Director of the FBI on September 4, 2001 - and reported directly to Michael Chertoff.
Photo: Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff whispers in the ear of Attorney General John Ashcroft
Chertoff has long-standing ties to the State of Israel and Israeli intelligence. Because I have been criticized by some for having revealed the fact that Michael Chertoff's mother worked for the Mossad, I am presenting here the obituary from the Star-Ledger in which I first found this information:
Livia Chertoff, 73, El Al flight attendant
Services for Mrs. Livia Chertoff, 73, of Delray Beach, Fla., mother of former U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, Michael Chertoff, will be held at 1 p.m. today in the Kreitzman's Memorial Home, 1500 Morris Ave., Union. Mrs. Chertoff died Saturday in the Ashbrook Nursing Home, Scotch Plains.
She was the first airline hostess for El Al Airlines and participated in Operation Magic Carpet, the famous airlift of Yemenite Jews to Israel.
Mrs. Chertoff also operated L'Artigue, an art gallery in Elizabeth.
Her son, Michael, served as Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York from 1983 through 1987 and as First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey from 1987 through 1990. He was U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey from 1990 through 1994 and during the Whitewater investigation in 1995 and 1996, he was counsel for the Senate Banking Committee.
Born in Poland, Mrs. Chertoff lived in Palestine and Elizabeth before moving to Florida several years ago.
Also surviving are three sisters, a brother and two grandchildren.  
Source: Star-Ledger (Newark, NJ), Dec. 21, 1998
I wrote in my earlier article about Chertoff: "Given his mother's role in the founding of the Israeli state and the intense Zionist character of his family, it seems likely that Chertoff spent time in Israel as a child."
Below is a passenger manifest document from El Al flight LY207/17 on 18 August 1955, which indicates he traveled from Israel to New York at the time. The El Al flight from Israel to New York originated at Lod airport, which is situated on the ruins of the ethnically-cleansed Palestinian town of Lydda. The Chertoffs may have spent some time in London visiting relatives there as well.
Passenger No. 28 is Michael Chertoff, at about age 3, travelling with his father, the orthodox rabbi Gershon Baruch Chertoff (No. 26) and his Israeli mother Livia Eisen Chertoff (No. 27). The El Al flight made a stop in Rome and London before continuing to New York.
It is interesting to note who are among the fellow passengers with the Chertoffs. Passenger No. 29, for example, Yehuda Koppel:
Koppel played an important role in the founding of the State of Israel as a leader in the Haganah. In the 1950's, he moved to New York where he opened the first American office of El Al, Israel's national airline, and where he lived until his death.
Likewise, in the previous post of Alvin K. Hellerstein's flight from Mexico City, the second passenger on Hellerstein's flight from Mexico City is a former U.S. Air Force pilot named Walter Roger Sarno:
Walter Roger Sarno, born in the Bronx in 1929, was a U.S. Air Force Veteran from the Korean War. He passed away on October 6, 2004. During the 1940s and 1950s, the Haganah was involved in illegal gun-running and aircraft-running operation to Palestine-Israel in which they recruited former U.S. military pilots to fly stolen U.S. planes to Israel. This was illegal arms smuggling activity done in complete violation of U.S. law. Mr. Sarno may have been involved in such activity, judging by his presence on this flight from Mexico City with Alvin Hellerstein.
Alvin K. Hellerstein, the federal judge overseeing all 9-11 litigation, appears to have been involved in illegal weapons smuggling schemes to Israel in the mid-1950s.  
This is just the tip of the iceberg of the illegal smuggling of weapons and airplanes to Israel in the 1950s. Members of the Chertoff family were also active in the airplane and weapons smuggling done by the Haganah gangsters and the Mossad from the U.S. to Israel in the 1950s. This information is discussed in my forthcoming article, the second chapter of the Solving 9-11 series.

Ehud Olmert's Secret Visit to New York on Eve of 9-11

December 2, 2007

Americans are constantly distracted and deceived by the media, which makes it very difficult for my countrymen to think deeply about things. This is most unfortunate. As a result, my fellow Americans are unable to comprehend their dire situation.
Unable to understand or defend the nation from the very real threats that surround them and have infiltrated their government, Americans have been deceived into throwing their money away and sending their sons and daughters to fight and die in artificial conflicts against cultures they do not know.
I was passing through New York City with my family in the early morning hours of 9-11 and have investigated and written about the events of that day for the past six years. As a result of my research and writing about 9-11, I have been the target of a great deal of abuse and defamation. While I pursued my investigation of 9-11, which challenged the official fairy tale, I saw that every institution that I had ever believed in was utterly corrupt and worthless – or worse.
The highly-vaunted American democratic republic is nothing but a sham and our elections are completely rigged. The churches are totally corrupt and the press is controlled. Even a so-called "populist" newspaper that I once wrote for is nothing but a controlled "opposition" outlet. There is nothing to believe in.
Ultimately, an undercover unit of the police came to my house and violently assaulted me in front of my family breaking my arm and TASERing me. Yet not a single newspaper in the United States found it to be a story worth reporting. The local press simply echoed the lies of the police and added to the defamation.
While I was in court with my wife, during the rigged process, my lawyer warned me to get my children out of our house immediately. The local police had been sent to kidnap my young children to force my daughter to testify. It was only by the grace of God, a very good and courageous friend, and a few brief seconds that my children avoided a truly traumatic experience. God is great.
The organizations that pretend to support and defend individuals and journalists against such abuses totally failed to even answer their phones or emails when I called and wrote.
This is the America I left. Now, at some distance from the American madness, I am finally able to think deeply about 9-11 and other things and this is what I do. This is my fate. This is my duty to my nation and the world. I am devoted to finding the truth about 9-11. In this pursuit I have had very, very, little support. But even if I had no support at all, I would still fight this battle. It is my fate. It is what God has given me.
A kindred spirit in Florida sent me a letter with a tip he thought I should see. He wrote:
Dear Mr. Bollyn,
Something has been bothering me for some years. I feel it may be insignificant, but the event is so out of place, that I had to share it with someone like you who investigates 9-11 earnestly.
This tip from Florida was anything but insignificant. It led me to a major discovery about the high-level Israeli involvement in 9-11.
Ehud Olmert, the right-wing Likud politician who is currently prime minister of Israel, was in New York on September 10, 2001, the day before 9-11, meeting with supporters of the Israeli terrorist gang of the Irgun (Betar). Olmert was in New York City on the very eve of 9-11 but has concealed this secret visit. Why?
What is most odd about Olmert's meeting in New York is that it was not reported at all and that Prime Minister Olmert has done everything to conceal the fact that he was in New York on the day before 9-11. Why would Ehud Olmert, the Irgunist mayor of occupied Jerusalem, seek to conceal the fact that he was in New York on September 10, 2001? And why would Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York, conspire to conceal Olmert's presence in New York on September 10 and 11, 2001?
Did the right-wing mayor of Jerusalem and close associate with the murderous Yitzhak Shamir stay in New York that night? Did he have a "front-row" seat for the Zionist terror spectacle that occurred the next day? The evidence strongly suggests that he did.
In an article entitled "A Fallen Empire," about the Likud-linked Jerusalem football club, Betar, the Jerusalem Post reported on July 23, 2004:

Three years ago, Betar was sold to a four-man consortium (US businessmen Meir and Shaul Levy, local businessman Meir Finegel, and Jerusalem real estate agent Sasson Shem Tov, who pulled out a few weeks ago), following a meeting in New York with then-mayor Ehud Olmert on September 10, 2001. There were no other potential buyers.
We know that Olmert spent September 9, 2001 in Toronto with the United Jewish Appeal for the beginning of its annual fundraising drive. This was reported in the Toronto Star on September 10, 2001.
So, it is clearly documented that Olmert, a right-wing supporter of Zionist terrorism and political ally of the Israeli criminals (e.g. Menachem Atzmon) who controlled passenger-screening operations at U.S. airports on 9-11, was in New York on September 10, 2001. Where was he on September 11, 2001?
The New York Times does not mention Ehud Olmert once between August 19, 2001 and December 23, 2001. Don't expect the New York Times to explain what is really going on. As a matter of fact, Ehud Olmert does not resurface in the U.S. media until September 17, 2001, when the Associated Press reported that he made a phone call to Mayor Rudolph Giuliani – 5 days after the attack. But where was Mayor Olmert from September 10 until he made the phone call on September 17?
As the New Haven Register reported on September 17, 2001, Olmert's "message of solidarity came Sunday" after nearly a week of unrelenting pain in New York. Why would Mayor Olmert wait five days to contact the mayor of New York City, especially given the fact that he had been in New York on the day before the attacks? And why has the Israeli prime minister concealed the fact that he was in New York – on the eve of the most disastrous terror attack in U.S. history? And who were the people he was meeting with and what are their ties to 9-11?
My friends, the conspiracy is quite clear. Olmert, the fascist mayor-cum-prime minister is at the center of the false-flag terror of 9-11. He does not reveal his presence because he was much more than a spectator – he was a participant in the "false-flag" terrorism that changed America. The former mayor of Jerusalem, who called Arab building in Jerusalem "a cancer and a plague," is deeply involved in 9-11. He is now the prime minister of the outlaw state known as Israel.

Top Secret: Ehud Olmert's 9-11 Visit to NYC

December 4, 2007

Ehud Olmert, the Likud mayor of Jerusalem from 1993 until 2003, made a secret visit to New York City on September 10, 2001 - the eve of the worst terror attack in U.S. history. What was this visit about and why has it been kept secret?

I found this information buried in a 3,000 word article in the Jerusalem Post about the Betar (Likud) football club from 2004. I confirmed it by finding an article in the Toronto press that Olmert had been at a Zionist fund raiser in Toronto on September 9, 2001. This is a huge story, but it takes some understanding of Olmert's ties to 9-11 to appreciate the significance of his secret visit to New York. For those who are not aware of Olmert's close ties to the key players in 9-11, I recommend reading my article "Ehud Olmert's Ties to 9-11" from June 2006.
What is so telling about Olmert's complicity in the attacks is that he, and the entire New York media and political community, pretended that he was never there on September 10, 2001. Olmert was the mayor of Jerusalem at the time, and Jerusalem has been the sister city of New York City since 1993, the year that Olmert became mayor. In 1995, Olmert upgraded that status to a special "mutual cooperation" between the two cities. Yet the mayor of Jerusalem comes to New York City on September 10, 2001, unannounced and unreported, and has a meeting with several Israeli "businessmen" who have businesses in Deerfield and Delray Beach, Florida, and nobody notices?
Then, in the immediate aftermath of 9-11, Olmert never says anything like this: "You know, I was just in New York City a few hours before the attacks. I can't believe that it happened to the city that I just visited."
Why has Olmert concealed his 9-11 visit? There can only be one explanation. The public is not supposed to know that the extreme right-wing mayor of terror-plagued Jerusalem was in New York City just before the terror attacks that changed American history. Why?
There is no way that Mayor Rudy Giuliani and the New York police department did not know that Olmert and his gang were in town. This is the questions the Giuliani should be asked: Were you, as mayor of New York City, aware that Ehud Olmert was in New York City on September 10, 2001? When did you learn that Olmert was in New York on September 10, 2001? Did Olmert stay until the 11th of September? At what point did Olmert leave New York City?
We know that Olmert was in Jerusalem on the afternoon of September 12, because he attended a ceremony marking the terror attack at the Sbarro pizzeria that was bombed in August 2001.
Note: The flight time from New York to Israel is 10 hours. Israel is 7 hours later than New York City. If Olmert had flown from New York on the afternoon of 9-11, he would have arrived early the following morning in Tel Aviv.
Photo: Ehud Olmert, the extreme right-wing mayor of occupied Jerusalem, with Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York City at the Emergency Operations Center in New York on September 21, 2001.
Ehud and Rudy have put up a complete false fascade. Clearly, this information, that Ehud Olmert was in New York City on the eve of 9-11, is information that the public is not supposed to know. I will be explaining the significance of his meeting with the Levy brothers of the "Wings" stores of Florida and other coastal states in another article.
Not a single newspaper in New York, or the world, has reported about Olmert's secret visit to New York on September 10, 2001. Pray tell Mr. Olmert, why were you in New York City on September 10, 2001 and why have you hidden this visit from the public?

On Enduring Dictators and Darkness

December 5, 2007

If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator.
- President-Elect George W. Bush, Dec. 18, 2000

In the Northern hemisphere, December brings the darkest days of the year. For many the lack of sunlight causes depression although we know that the days of darkness are part of the natural cycle and won't last forever.

We are also going through a dark period in American and Western history. It is clear to most observers that Americans, and their allies, are suffering under a criminal regime that rules through lies, fear, and deception. The tyranny of darkness we are going through has certainly lasted much longer than a winter season, but we should remember that just as surely as the sun will return after the winter solstice, this tyranny of lies and deception will also pass. Those who have supported it will be held accountable for their actions.
A regime that is based on lies, deception and fear cannot last long. As the Holy Bible says, we should not fear the evildoers knowing that their lies will be exposed: "Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known." (Matt. 10:26, King James)
Israelis and Americans are similar in several respects. Both are extremely propagandized populations suffering under criminal regimes. Israelis and Americans are both people living in nations that were created through immigration and settlement on previously occupied land. In both cases the indigenous people have been treated badly and suffered immense injustices. Both nations are also victims of propaganda and deception on a grand scale. False-flag terrorism and relentless propaganda have been ruthlessly applied to both societies. As a result, both nations are being turned into paranoid fortress states in which a very unhealthy fear and distorted view of the world is cultivated by the media and governments. Both states have become militaristic, reckless, and arrogant, thinking that their military power validates who they are. They have become the real barbarians of the world.
It may be difficult to comprehend, but the criminal regimes behind both states have committed and exploited acts of terrorism against their own people to empower their regimes and to shape public opinion to support their evil agenda.
I recall following a terror bombing in Jerusalem in which the first reports were that a parked car had exploded. As soon as the bombed car was towed away the reports were changed to say that a suicide bomber had caused the blast. (Note that terror attacks have virtually ceased in Israel in the years after 9-11.)
Americans can't say they were not warned that George W. Bush had thoughts of being a dictator: he said as much quite openly on several occasions.
If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator.
-- Gov. George W. Bush (R-TX), President-Elect, December 18, 2000
"You don't get everything you want. A dictatorship would be a lot easier."
-- Bush describing his governorship of Texas, Governing Magazine, August 1998
"A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it," he recently joked.
-- Sonya Ross, AP, July 27, 2001
Also quoted by Richard S. Dunham in Business Week, July 30, 2001
Unfortunately, these outrageous comments by George W. Bush were never taken seriously. Likewise, his family's relationship to other dictatorial rulers is not widely discussed or known. As Burke's Peerage revealed, George W. Bush "is closely related to every European monarch on and off the throne."
Shortly before the 2000 presidential election a short story from Reuters in London about the Bush family ancestry was published, but only in a few papers and very briefly. It is, however, an article that is well worth reading.
The original Reuters story of October 17, 2001 appeared under the title "Bush Beats Gore in Presidential 'Blue Blood' Stakes."
LONDON (Reuters) - If royal genes have anything to do with electoral success, then Republican U.S. presidential candidate George W. Bush will be the next man in the White House, Britain's blue blood bible said Tuesday. Burke's Peerage, a revered guide to the breeding of the aristocracy, said both Bush and his rival Al Gore are of royal descent, but investigations deep into their heritage show Bush has far more noble and royal connections.
Bush is closely related to every European monarch on and off the throne -- including the King of Albania -- and has kinship with every member of Britain's royal family, the House of Windsor.
He is a 13th cousin of Britain's Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth and is a 13th cousin once removed of the heir to the throne, Prince Charles.
Bush's family tree can be documented as far back as the early 15th century. He has a direct descent from Henry III and from Henry VIII's sister Mary Tudor, who was also the wife of Louis XII of France. He is also descended from Charles II of England.
"It is now clear that Mr. Gore and Mr. Bush have an unusually large number of royal and noble descents," said Harold Brooks-Baker, publishing director of Burke's Peerage. "In point of fact, never in the history of the United States have two presidential candidates been as well endowed with royal alliances."
This important story about the man who became president twice through corrupt and stolen elections should have been investigated further by the newspapers in the nation. It was, however, only published, after being greatly reduced, in a handful of newspapers in the fall of 2000.

©2024 Christopher Bollyn | Sitemap | christopher at bollyn dot com