Print Contact Articles by Subject 9-11 Archive 2010

NYFD Survivors of Explosions on 9/11

December 11, 2010

The following video is important testimonial evidence of three NYFD firemen on 9/11.  The three firefighters are from Ladder Company 24 - Jimmy Grillo (the injured one in the middle), and probably James Duffy and Tyrone Johnson.  These men describe witnessing explosions going off in the lobby of hotel next to the tower before the collapse.

James Grillo was trying to reach his sister at the family business, a Citgo gas station in Lindenhurst.  The Grillo family is from the Babylon-Lindenhurst area on Long Island.  Some critics (i.e. anti-truthers) claim that Grillo was not in the lobby of the South Tower.  His comments on Larry King indicate he was:

Comment on Larry King from Jimmy Grillo:

GRILLO: I was -- my assignment with Ladder 24, the company I'm assigned to, we were supposed to go into building No. 2, the south tower and make our way into tower No. 1, the north tower. And we were caught in the collapse in the lobby of tower No. 2, the south tower.

Jimmy Grillo's 9/11 testimony of explosions in the interior of the tower is supported and confirmed by John Schroeder of the NYFD - 



WikiLeaks, Israel, and the 9/11 Crime Gang

Updated - December 27, 2010

Forthcoming WikiLeaks cables on Israel may expose some of the crimes of the Israeli mega-terrorist Ehud Barak.

TRUTH WILL OUT - A protester in London shows her support for imprisoned Julian Assange using Shakespeare's line from The Merchant of Venice - "truth will come to light; murder cannot be hid long; a man's son may, but at the length truth will out."

“The Guardian, El Pais and Le Monde have published only two percent of the files related to Israel due to the sensitive relations between Germany, France and Israel. Even the New York Times could not publish more due to the sensitivities related to the Jewish community in the US.”
- Julian Assange to Al Jazeera, December 22, 2010
Source: 'Cables to be released on Israel, Lebanon, Mabhouh',
Jerusalem Post

WikiLeaks has a four-year publishing history. During that time we have changed whole governments, but not a single person, as far as anyone is aware, has been harmed.  But the U.S., with Australian government connivance, has killed thousands in the past few months alone. 

- “Don't shoot messenger for revealing uncomfortable truths” by Julian Assange, The Australian, December 8, 2010

In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell.
- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black on U.S. 713
New York Times Co. v. United States

Sweden is in the middle of the storm swirling around Julian Assange. 

There seems to be an effort underway on the Internet to discredit Julian Assange and WikiLeaks as some sort of Israeli intelligence plot.  The basis of this illogical effort seems to be based on the fact that the newspapers that received the WikiLeaks material have not published cables critical of Israel.  Recently, Assange told Al Jazeera that WikiLeaks cables on Israel will be released in the coming months.  He explained that the newspapers chose not to publish cables concerning Israel.  Assange reportedly claims to have about 3,700 files related to Israel, most from the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv.  Assange said that WikiLeaks plans to release "top secret" cables regarding Israel's war with Hezbollah militants in Lebanon in the summer of 2006.

"WikiLeaks will release cables concerning Israel, the Second Lebanon War and the Mabhouh assassination in the next six months," the Jerusalem Post reported on December 23, quoting the Al Jazeera interview with Assange.  Only a small number of documents related to Israel have been published so far because newspapers in the West that had exclusive rights to publish the material were hesitant to publish sensitive information about Israel, the Qatari newspaper the Peninsula reported, citing the interview.

Assange has also reportedly made comments that indicate that he is not very well versed or keen on the 9/11 terrorism conspiracy.  It would be wonderful if Assange were an engaged 9/11 skeptic and we could access the secret cables of the people involved in the false-flag terror atrocity that changed the world, but such plans are very seldom written down or exchanged on the Internet.   

As an American journalist who was brutally attacked at my home by undercover police and maliciously prosecuted for my research and writing about 9/11, I tried unsuccessfully to contact Julian Assange when he began having legal problems in Sweden last summer.  Had I gotten through to Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, I would have strongly advised him not to trust the legal system or to turn himself in to the authorities in Britain, as he did earlier this week.  The reason, I would explain, is that one should never negotiate with terrorists and criminals.  Julian now finds himself in the belly of the beast, and the beast is a real terrorist.  Extricating himself from the grasp of British and U.S. intelligence services will be difficult and he is at their mercy so long as he is in their custody.  As we know, these people do not have any mercy for people like Assange.  

One needs to keep a few key facts in mind concerning the material released by WikiLeaks

1.  The material was leaked to the press by U.S. citizens within the military or government;

2.  The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are illegal wars of aggression;

3.  Iran has the legal right to develop its nuclear program.

The illegality of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is a subject that is seldom discussed in the U.S. media.  As the victor of the genocidal war against Germany, the United States wrote the Nuremberg Charter with the intention of using it against the vanquished Nazis.  The idea that the United States would be involved in a criminal war of aggression is beyond the pale for most Americans who consume mind-numbing war propaganda along with their breakfast, lunch, and dinner.  Most Americans don't know, for example, that the U.S. and Britain targeted the civilian population of Germany and that nearly every German city was completely incinerated in 1945 and millions of German civilians killed after the war by intentional starvation in hundreds of concentration camps.   Most Americans would be shocked to know that the camps run by General Eisenhower and the U.S. Army were the real "death camps" in which hundreds of thousands of innocent Germans were literally starved to death.  These egregious war crimes against the German people define genocide and holocaust.*

Millions of innocent Germans were held in General Eisenhower's death camps after the war...

in which nothing, not even water, was provided for the prisoners and where more than one million died from starvation.  German prison camps, like Buchenwald, were much better equipped and organized than the U.S. camps, in which death was all that awaited the prisoners.

The war in Afghanistan, however, can legally be described as a "war of aggression."  The invasion and occupation was planned in advance of 9/11, which was actually a false-flag terror attack designed to sway public opinion to support the military conquest of the poor, but strategically located and mineral-rich Central Asian nation.  The fact that President Barack Obama adopted the illegal war policy in Afghanistan makes him just as culpable as George W. Bush and the people who conspired and began the criminal war in 2001.

The latest release of secret U.S. embassy cables by WikiLeaks shows how the State Department uses its influence to get other nations to support the criminal Zionist war policy in the Middle East.  This policy means corrupting European nations to get them to actively support the U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, while coming down hard on Iran for developing its nuclear program, which it is legally entitled to.  Because the war in Afghanistan is a criminal war, the State Department efforts corrupt other states by making them party to a war crime. 

Looking through the WikiLeaks cables released on December 8, I found an interesting cable from Alan D. Solomont, U.S. Ambassador to Spain.  The name jumped out at me because the Solomont family of Boston is closely connected to the destruction of steel from the World Trade Center, my current subject of research.  The Solomont cables indicate that the ambassador was pushing Spain to send more troops to Afghanistan although Spanish public opinion has always been strongly opposed to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Spain is also being pressed to take a tough line against Iran for its nuclear program, which it is legally entitled to.

Alan Solomont was a crucial fundraiser and donor for Barack Obama, and was given the position as U.S. Ambassador in return for the millions of dollars he raised. The Solomont family is well-known for its financial crimes.  One of Alan’s brothers, Jay, served time in an Israeli prison for misappropriation of funds, while his other brother, David, was accused of embezzling $1 million from a start-up firm (settled out of court).

Ambassador Solomont was a crucial supporter of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and is a close friend of Senator John Kerry, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

While Ambassador Solomont's family connections to Israeli criminals may seem de rigueur among members of the Zionist crimocracy running the Obama White House, the Solomont family relationship with one of the key players in the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center is quite telling and deserves to be noted.

Jay Solomont, the ambassador's brother who served time in an Israeli prison for financial crimes, is married to Debra Weiner.  Debra's sister, Beth Weiner, is married to Jehuda Saar, one of the two Israelis who organized the network to dispose of the steel from the destroyed World Trade Center.

Jehuda Saar, one of the Israelis who worked for Marc Rich, arranged for the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center in Asian smelters.

Jehuda Saar and Nathan K. Fruchter are two orthodox Jews (with family connections to the Jewish diamond dealers of Antwerpen) who worked with the Israeli Mossadnik Marc Rich (Glencore AG) in the 1990s in the United States and Europe.  In January 1999, the Mossad sent them to Hugo Neu, the scrap metal trader of New York and New Jersey to create an "international trading division". 

This "international trading division" of Hugo Neu was used to dispose of many tons of the critical steel evidence from the World Trade Center, before it could be examined by engineers.  This is part of the 9/11 crime for which we can clearly identify the culprits.  This will be dealt with in greater detail in the final chapter of my book about 9/11, which I hope to have ready soon.

Jehuda Saar, the garbage man, was part of Mossad's 9/11 clean-up crew, sending the steel evidence from the World Trade Center to steel mills in Asia - where it was destroyed far from the prying eyes of U.S. investigators and engineers.

Knowing that he was part of a massive crime against the people of the United States, Saar moved to Israel with his family.

In Israel, Saar supports Benjamin Netanyahu, who is part of the 9/11 criminal network...

and enjoys life with his share of the ill-gotten $36 million made from selling some 300,000 tons of steel from the destroyed World Trade Center.

Nathan K. Fruchter of Lawrence (Long Island), New York, and Israel, was Saar's partner at Hugo Neu.  Both Saar and Fruchter are still listed as doing business in the United States as Idoru Trading LLC at 505 Jorgen Street in Lawrence, New York.  I called Idoru to see what information I could get out of the people who arranged the sale of the steel to China.  An Israeli man answered the phone.  I asked for Nathan Fruchter and after a few seconds was speaking with him.

Nathan Fruchter was a passenger on the first flight from China on the A380.

Fruchter is an orthodox Jew, like nearly every one of the 9/11 culprits.  For the orthodox nationalist Jews, serving the state of Israel is a religious obligation.  For this reason they make perfect agents for the Mossad.

Danny Fruchter, an Israeli Mossadnik diamond dealer who had offices in Antwerpen, Belgium, is probably an uncle to Nathan. 

Fruchter came to the phone. I introduced myself as a journalist writing about the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.  I asked Fruchter about the role he and Jehuda Saar played in the recycling of the steel.  He said “cut the crap” and hung up the phone. 

I called right back and Fruchter answered the phone. I said that my phone had apparently dropped the connection.  Although he was unwilling to discuss the recycling of the steel, he
told me that Sims had taken over Hugo Neu, which is not quite true.

When I pressed him on the steel from the World Trade Center, Fruchter said he had been fired from Hugo Neu on January 30, 2000, which is certainly not true. The International Herald Tribune did a story about Fruchter in November 2000 in which he is described as being "vice president of the international trading division of Hugo Neu Corporation in Manhattan."

Why would Fruchter lie about when he worked at Hugo Neu, who "recycled" much of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center?

I called Hugo Neu to ask when Fruchter left the company and what his role had been in the recycling of the steel.  I was able to ask two questions:

What role did the international trading division headed by Nathan Fruchter and Jehuda Saar play in the recycling of the steel from the WTC?

How long did Nathan Fruchter and Jehuda Saar head your international trading division?

I left my email address and am still awaiting a response from Hugo Neu.  Given the reluctance of the people involved in the destruction of the steel World Trade Center to speak, I am not holding my breath.  There is much more to this story about Hugo Neu and its connections to the Mossad and Israeli military intelligence services, which will be detailed in my forthcoming chapter. 

Hugo Neu is named after its founder, the current owner's father.  Hugo Neu worked with Walter Rothschild and Meno Lippauer, German Jews who came to the United States in the early 20th Century.  What is very interesting is that Hugo Neu is an investor in an Israeli/Mossad venture capital fund called the AquaAgroFund.


One of the managing partners of the AquaAgroFund is Nir Belzer, who is also the co-founder of the Millenium Material Technologies Funds (MMT).  The MMT is a fund that is run by three Israeli men and specializes in energetic nano-coatings and thin films.

See MMT portfolio here

Belzer's information is here:

Belzer co-founded the MMT fund with Oren Gafri, who runs a company called Cima NanoTech, which specializes in production of super-thin energetic coatings, exactly like the coating of nano-thermite that was used to pulverize the World Trade Center on 9/11.  Like most Mossad technology companies, Cima NanoTech is really based in Israel:

Cima NanoTech is based in the US, with its R&D center in Caesarea, Israel, and a commercial manufacturing facility in Hiroshima, Japan. Additional laboratory facilities in Korea, Japan, and the US support the work of the Israel lab and enable close, local partnerships with electronics manufacturers to meet their specific needs.

Gafri has a background in nano-coatings and R&D with the Israeli military and its Nuclear Research Center in the Negev:

Oren Gafri is one of the founders of the Millennium Materials Funds.

Mr. Gafri is the Chairman of the Israeli Material & Processes Society (IMPS), Technion, and the chairman of the Israeli Welding Institute (IWI) Ltd. Mr. Gafri was previously CEO of Pulsar Welding Ltd. (in respect of which he was elected by the Tel Aviv University to be Entrepreneur of the Year 1998), a portfolio company of MMT I (1996-2001), and General Manager of Chemitas Ltd. (1989-1995), the largest manufacturer and supplier of specialty chemicals in Israel (a partnership of Metallgesellscaft/ Chemetall, and Tambour Paints).

During the years 1979 to 1989 Mr. Gafri served as an executive of the Israeli Aircraft Industries Ltd (IAI), Bedek Division, as the Manager of Materials and Process, in charge of the Chemical, Metallurgical, Composite and Non Destructive Testing (NDT) facilities, Labs and R&D.

Mr. Gafri received his B.Sc. and M.Sc. studies in Materials & Process Engineering at Ben-Gurion University (with a specialization in thin films and plasma coating) and completed a Business Administration for Engineers program at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem with the IAI and the School for Business Administration, and other training courses at the Nuclear Research Center - Negev (Israel), IAI, Leybold Heraeus (USA), Parker & Amchem/Henkel (USA), Metallgesellschaft/ Chemetall (Germany) and Atotech (Germany and the U.K.).


The final chapter of Solving 9/11 will examine this material and more in greater detail.  It will be sent to those who donate to and will be published in early 2011.

Sources and Recommended Reading and Viewing:

Julian Assange interview with David Frost, December 22, 2010

WikiLeaks homepage is at

WikiLeaks U.S. Embassy Cables are at

'Cables to be released on Israel, Lebanon, Mabhouh', Jerusalem Post, December 23, 2010

'WikiLeaks to publish Israel cables on Second Lebanon War, Dubai assassination', Haaretz, December 23, 2010

"WikiLeaks to release more Israel cables", JTA, December 23, 2010

Alan D. Solomont Biography, Ambassador Spain and Andorra, U.S. Department of State

“Brotherly trouble”, by Steve Bailey, Boston Globe, March 24, 2004

"Frequent Travelers Pick the Best and the Worst Airports : The Good, the Bad and the Ugly", by Mary A. Kelly, International Herald Tribune, November 17, 2000 

Solomont family donates millions to political candidates,

"US embassy cables: US embassy in Madrid asks Spain to find creative solutions to Nazi looted art problem", Guardian, December 8, 2010

* The Allied war crimes and genocide against the German people are well documented in the following recommended books and articles:

Brandstätten by Jörg Friedrich is an excellent book on the Allied bombardment of German cities in 1945.

"Eisenhower's Death Camps - The Last Dirty Secret of World War Two" by James Bacque, September 1989

Brandstätten: Der Anblick des Bombenkriegs, by Jörg Friedrich, Propyläen, München 2003

Martha Heinrich Acht Dresden 1944/45, by Mattheas Neutzner, Verlag der Kunst Dresden 1998

Nemesis at Potsdam: The Expulsion of the Germans from the East, by Alfred M. de Zayas, Picton Press, Rockport, Maine 1998

Other Losses: The Shocking Truth Behind the Mass Deaths of Disarmed German Soldiers and Civilians Under General Eisenhower’s Command, by James Bacque, Prisma Publishing, 1991 (First published by Stoddart Publishing Co. Ltd., Canada 1989)  

Friends of Israel and the Treason of 9/11

November 22, 2010

Anthony Lawson, a brave and brilliant Australian, has produced another excellent video about the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the treasonous acts committed by the "friends of Israel."  This is highly recommended viewing.


Why the "Mastermind of 9-11" is Kept Secluded

Updated: October 9, 2010

On the ninth anniversary of the "War on Terror" the lead editorial of the global edition of the New York Times suggested that the accused "Mastermind of 9/11", Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, will probably never be put on trial.  

These interesting comments from the New York Times were found in its editorial entitled "Military Injustice", a piece that was published in the New York edition on October 6:

There are more than 170 inmates left in Guantánamo. Only 36 have been referred for prosecution, some very dangerous men. Forty-eight are in a long-term detention that is certainly illegal. Almost all the rest are in limbo while the Obama team tries to figure out what to do. The chances are dimming every day that prisoners like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, will ever be brought to justice. 

The only inmate on trial in Guantánamo is Omar Khadr, a Canadian who was accused at age 15 of killing an American soldier in Afghanistan. He has been held in extralegal detention for more than eight years, and the military has been attempting to try him since 2005. The thin evidence against him is tainted by his credible allegations of abuse.

This is the first time, to my knowledge, that a newspaper of record like the New York Times has acknowledged what I have said for years: the U.S. government will not put on trial the man they say is the "Mastermind of 9/11."  Go figure. 

The editors of the New York Times, however, don't tell you the real reason why the man accused of being behind the terror atrocity of 9/11 is not being brought to court.  For that information you would have to read the articles that I have written about this subject
on, several of which can be found at the bottom of this updated article.

The basic reason that there will be no trial for the so-called "Mastermind of 9/11" is because the suspect being held at Guantánamo is neither Khalid Sheikh Mohammed nor the "Mastermind of 9/11", and the U.S. government and military are well aware of that.   

The New York Times is floating the idea now to prepare public opinion for the bizarre outcome I have predicted since March 2007.  There will be no trial because the U.S. does not have a case against the man they say is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.  For that matter, they don't even have Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

See Editorial - "Civil Justice, Military Injustice", New York Times, October 5, 2010

Nine years after 9-11, the U.S. government is letting the so-called "mastermind" of 9-11 languish in "legal limbo" in Guantanamo.  Why would they do that?   If they have a case against the man they claim to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, why don't they make it?  What are they waiting for?  Why is this criminal process being obstructed, just like the 9-11 tort litigation in the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein?  Who does Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder really represent?


Attorney General Eric Holder on Face the Nation on July 11 gave lame excuses for the U.S. government's failure to hold a trial for the so-called "mastermind" of 9-11.  The real reason the U.S. can't hold the trial is because the man they have is neither Khalid Sheikh Mohammed nor the mastermind of 9-11.  It is all a pack of lies and they are probably just waiting for him to die so they can close the book on this sordid Zionist atrocity.  Is Eric Holder working for the Zionists?

Eric Himpton Holder Jr., No. 33, at Stuyvesant High School in Manhattan in 1969, "whose students were primarily white and Jewish." Holder learned at a young age to navigate different worlds..."After fourth grade, my schools were largely white, predominantly Jewish," recalls Holder. 

Eric Holder not only studied with Jews, his family vacationed with the most elite Jewish Zionist families in the United States.  Here, the Holder family returns on a BOAC flight from Bermuda in April 1956 with the family of the mega-Zionist Edward Warburg.  Warburg's mother was the only daughter of Jacob Schiff.   Eric Holder may have Jewish roots on his father's side of the family.  Eric Holder's relationship with highest-level Zionists explains his appointment to serve as U.S. Attorney General.


An Associated Press news story of July 31, entitled
"U.S. Stalls on Sept. 11 Trial for 5 at Gitmo", reported on the "black hole" in which the alleged mastermind of 9-11 has been placed.  A black hole is a dark spot in the universe from which even light cannot escape.  Why is the terror mastermind of 9-11 in a black hole created by the U.S. government?  

As the U.S. military prepares for the first war crimes trial under President Barack Obama, its most high-profile case against the planners of the Sept. 11 attacks is stuck in political and legal limbo.

Canadian prisoner Omar Khadr, accused of killing an American soldier during a raid on an al-Qaida compound, is scheduled to go to trial Aug. 9 at the U.S. base in Cuba.

But Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the professed mastermind of the attacks, and four alleged accomplices are still sequestered at Guantanamo without charges. The Obama administration, after months of review, hasn't made a decision on whether to seek a military or civilian trial...

"There's no case, there's no judge, there's nothing," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Richard Federico, a military lawyer appointed to defend alleged plotter Ramzi bin al Shibh. "They are back into the black hole."

"U.S. Stalls on Sept. 11 Trial for 5 at Gitmo" by Ben Fox, AP, July 31, 2010

This is a government scam I have reported on for years.  Here is where I left off last February:

On February 7, President Barack Obama acknowledged fierce opposition to his plans to bring accused 9-11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) to justice in New York, but would not rule out such a trial.

David E. Klett, a retired professor of thermodynamics, had the real KSM in several of his classes.  Asked about the photo (above) of the person said to be the terror mastermind, Klett said, "I did not recognize that person.  I never saw that face before."

The administration says that it wants to prosecute Sheikh Mohammed and four co-defendants in a federal court in lower Manhattan, close to the site of the World Trade Center attack which killed nearly 3,000 people in 2001.

But the plan has faced opposition from local lawmakers and authorities who have balked at the huge costs of such a trial, while others have warned of perceived security implications.

"I have not ruled it out, but I think it is important for us to take into account the practical logistical issues involved," Obama said in a live interview from the White House on CBS.  "If you have got a city that is saying no, and a police department that is saying no, and a mayor that is saying no, that makes it difficult," Obama said.

But he added: "we have not ruled out anything -- we will make a definitive judgement based on consultations with all the relevant authorities."  New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg initially welcomed the idea of holding a September 11 trial in New York, but reversed his position last month, saying that a military base would make more sense as a venue.

"It’s going to cost an awful lot of money and disturb an awful lot of people," Bloomberg said. "Can we provide security? Yes. Could you provide security elsewhere? Yeah, and I mean the suggestion of a military base is probably a reasonably good one."


I was not at all surprised to read that officials in New York City took David Axelrod aside and told him that the city could not allow the trial of Khalid Sheik Mohammed and other 9-11 suspects to go ahead.  I never expected that this trial would go ahead in anything resembling an open court.  It is clear that this trial cannot go ahead.  The media discussion about the high cost of security is just the cover story.  The FBI and the U.S. government do not want it to be exposed that a scapegoat has been used to push the fraudulent "War on Terror."

After a dinner in New York on Dec. 14, Steven Spinola, president of the Real Estate Board of New York, pulled aside David Axelrod, President Obama’s closest adviser, to convey an urgent plea: move the 9/11 trial out of Manhattan.
Source: "U.S. Drops Plan for a 9/11 Trial in New York City", New York Times, January 29, 2010

The Obama administration will not have an open 9-11 trial because it would expose the fraud that the person said to be Khalid Sheik Mohammed is not the terror mastermind of 9-11.  He is, in fact, not even Khalid Sheik Mohammed.  The person said to be KSM is a "feeble-minded" man named Ahmed Abdul Qudoos.  He has been scapegoated and made to fill in for the real KSM, who was killed in Pakistan.

The real KSM studied mechanical engineering at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University.

The man said (by U.S. officials) to be Khalid Sheik Mohammed is clearly not a bright-eyed and articulate English speaking engineer.

Is the so-called KSM really Ahmed Abdul Qudoos?

The U.S. government cannot hold an open trial in the United States with the false KSM because there are people in the United States who knew and remember the real KSM, such as his former teachers in North Carolina.  As I wrote in 2007:

Furthermore, the real KSM was a person who had traveled and worked extensively across Asia and had lived in many foreign countries, from the United States to the Philippines to Bosnia.  With this level of education and foreign travel, the real KSM would have a much greater command of the English language than what we find in the transcript.

There were no defense attorneys or members of the press allowed to the secret hearing in which the military tribunal heard the confession of the alleged architect of 9/11.

"The Detainee served as the head of the Al Qaida military committee and was Osama bin Laden's principal Al Qaida operative who directed the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States," the statement said.

“I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z,’’ the detainee said through an interpreter, according to the transcript of the hearing.  He also claimed responsibility for the 1993 bombing at the World Trade Center.

The detainee sat with an Arabic interpreter to his left and a U.S. military officer who was his official representative to his right.

"I not take the oath…" the detainee said in broken English about why he was not taking an oath in the court.  "Just to explain for this one, does not mean I'm not saying that I'm lying.  When I not take oath does not mean I'm lying."

"I understand," the tribunal president said.

But how can such meaningless gibberish coming from an unidentified detainee who has not taken an oath be seen by anyone as a credible confession?

No photographs accompanied the release of the KSM confession and there are very few photos of the person who is accused of being the terrorist mastermind of our time. 

To see if the disheveled, hairy, and overweight person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed resembled the mechanical engineering student that studied in Greensboro in the 1980s, I contacted the engineering faculty of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University.

David E. Klett, a retired professor of thermodynamics, had the real KSM in several of his classes.  Asked about the photos of the person said to be the terror mastermind, Klett said, "I did not recognize that person.  I never saw that face before."

- Source: "The Absence of Justice for 9/11 Victims", Christopher Bollyn, March 20, 2007

To understand the real reason for the abrupt cancellation of the planned 9-11 trial in Manhattan, read the following article, especially the articles at the bottom about the identity fraud concerning the real KSM.

"Terror Risk High as Obama Ponders Afghan Fiasco"

Christopher Bollyn, "Why Afghanistan?" September 28, 2009

Bollyn, "The Great Game - The War For Caspian Oil And Gas," October 14, 2001

Bollyn, "Gitmo Gulag Process Falls into Chaos," July 16, 2009

Bollyn, "Terror Mastermind KSM is an Imposter - The Confession is Fake," March 16, 2007

Bollyn, "The Absence of Justice for 9/11 Victims," March 20, 2007

Bollyn, "When and Where was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Captured - or Killed?" March 16, 2007  

"Making History With Obama" by Andrew Longstreth, The American Lawyer, June 5, 2008

"Holder, High Achiever Poised to Scale New Heights", by Javier C. Hernandez, November 30, 2008

Calling Shaul Eisenberg

October 25, 2010

"By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Make War" is the official motto of the Mossad. "Tahvulot" in Hebrew is better translated as "with tricks" than as "way of deception", and is deeply related to the modern word for "terrorism."
- Ro'i Tov, The Cross of Bethlehem

After nine years, when we consider the huge deception of 9/11 we can conclude that the criminal network behind the false flag terror attacks is linked to the U.S. establishment at the highest levels.  By noting the key entities behind the 9/11 cover-up (and promotion of the illegal wars that followed in its aftermath) we can narrow down the field of possible suspects. 

Firstly, the past 6 White House administrations (i.e. George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama) have all been instrumental in the 9/11 cover-up.  Although George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton occupied the White House prior to 2001, their actions before and after leaving the White House have been essential to the cover-up. 

Secondly, the U.S. intelligence community (especially the C.I.A. and F.B.I.) has consistently lied to the public about 9/11, destroyed criminal evidence, and exploited the false-flag terror attacks to wage war against the American people and nations in the Middle East and Central Asia.  These organizations and their officers are clearly working against the interests of the American people and have committed treasonous crimes against the republic.

Thirdly, the mainstream media (i.e. controlled press) has been crucial to the success of the 9/11 deception for the past nine years.  They have promoted the war policy and attacked those, such as the author, who have questioned the official explanation of what happened on 9/11.  And lastly, the Elders of Zion secret societies such as the B'nai B'rith and its network (ADL, Hillel, etc.) have supported the 9/11 cover-up and used their influence to slander and attack critics of the official version. 

When we consider that the Zionist network behind 9/11 effectively controls all of the above, we can conclude that the masterminds of 9/11 are from the highest levels of the Zionist enterprise.  They would be people at the Rothschild financial level of the Mossad who have been involved with all of the above named in major criminal activities such as huge drug and weapons smuggling operations and immense financial crimes.  On the short list of chief suspects we would find Shaul Eisenberg.   

Shaul Nehemia Eisenberg, a highest-level Mossad chief and head of Israel Corp., Atasco, and Atwell Security, is suspected of being the chief mastermind of the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.  Eisenberg is also thought to be dead, since 27 March 1997.  Did Shaul Eisenberg, the founder of Israel Corporation, fake his death in 1997 to avoid scrutiny and prosecution for a long list of very serious crimes – including running Mossad's U.S. drug network and 9/11?

Shaul Nehemia Eisenberg worked closely with the Japanese military training Betar and Irgun terrorists during World War II.

While such a "Huck Finn" stunt may seem ludicrous, at least three other Israeli criminals who apparently faked their deaths (or coma) to avoid being arrested for serious crimes come to mind: Amiram Nir, Alexander Voronin, and Ariel Sharon.  As I explain in Solving 9/11, Eisenberg owned the Mossad company called Atwell Security.  Atwell tried to obtain the security contract for the World Trade Center (and Port Authority) in the late 1980s.

According to members of Eisenberg's family, now living in New York City,  Shaul Eisenberg died in China on March 27, 1997.  On April 1 of that year, April Fool's Day no less, the New York Times ran this paid death notice:

The Associated Press published a similar obituary for the 76-year-old "billionaire Shaul Eisenberg" who supposedly died on March 27, 1997:

JERUSALEM -- Billionaire Shaul Eisenberg, a refugee from Nazi Germany who built up a global business empire, died of a heart attack yesterday during a trip to Beijing, his family said. He was 76.

Claims by his family notwithstanding, the Israeli media writes about Shaul Eisenberg as if he were still very much alive. Globes, an Israeli business news source, for example, published two articles in the spring of 2010 that suggest that Eisenberg is alive:

Ogen Yielding Real Estate Ltd. (TASE:OGEN) is expanding the BMC Software complex in Tel Aviv's Ramat Hahayal high-tech zone. Ogen will add ten floors to the seven-floor Building C at an investment of NIS 70 million. Construction has already begun and is scheduled to be completed by December 2011...Shaul Eisenberg controls Ogen through Isralom Ltd. subsidiary Ocif Investments and Development Ltd. (TASE: OCIF).
- Michal Margalit in
Globes, June 6, 2010

Ogen Yielding Real Estate Ltd. (TASE:OGEN), controlled by Shaul Eisenberg, went on a shopping spree last week, buying the Ispro office complex in the Kiryat Sapir industrial zone in Netanya from Ispro - The Israel Properties Rental Corp. Ltd. (TASE: IPRO) for NIS 205 million and buying out its partner in the Weizmann Business Park in Rehovot for NIS 70 million...Ispro is a unit of Nochi Dankber-controlled IDB Holding Corp. Ltd. (TASE:IDBH) held through Property and Building Ltd. (TASE: PTBL).

Eisenberg controls Ogen through Isralom Properties Ltd. (TASE:ILOM) subsidiary Ocif Investments and Development Ltd. (TASE: OCIF). Ogen's share price opened today at NIS 8.36, giving a market cap of NIS 322 million.
- Michal Margalit in
Globes, May 23, 2010

Both articles were published by Globes [online], a well known source of Israeli business news.  Globes has 34 articles about Shaul Eisenberg in their online archive.

To try and get some clarity on this matter I called Shaul's daughter in New York, Esther J. Zuhovitzky.  Esther is the wife of the Israeli Jonathan Zuhovitzky, who answered the phone. The Zuhovitzky's run an Israeli investment fund called "First Capital Advisers".  The Zuhovitzky's are both on the board of directors of a Zionist charity called American Friends of Rabin Medical Center (AFRMC), where they are described thusly:

Esther Zuhovitsky is a private investor and Principal, First Capital (Israel) LTD.
Jonathan Zuhovitsky is an Investment Banker. Principal, First Capital Advisers, LLC.

At AFRMC the Zuhovitzky's mingle with some of the highest Zionist agents in the United States.  The Israeli president of the organization is Nava Barak, the former wife of Ehud Barak.  Some of the names in this list, such as Shalom YORAN, will be very familiar to those who have read my articles on the Israeli network behind 9/11:

Jonathan Zuhovitzky answered the phone when I called on Sunday morning (a working day for Israelis).  I introduced myself and asked to speak to Esther.  I said I was working on an article about Shaul Eisenberg.  He refused to let me speak to his wife.  His responses, which were seldom answers, were very sarcastic and wrapped in a constant nervous laugh.  I told him that my first question was about the fact that Israel's Globes business news refers to Shaul as if he were still living.  

He said that Esther would not want to speak with me, so I asked him if his household was an Orthodox home in which he made such decisions for his wife. 

He tried to say that I was being aggressive.  I told him that I was simply trying to reach Esther in order to obtain some comments from Eisenberg's daughter.  When I asked him questions about Shaul's work with the Japanese military during the Second World War (beginning in 1940), Zuhovitzky joked about it.  I read him a paragraph from a TIME magazine article about the subject and he tried to pooh-pooh it as well.

When I asked him about Shaul's marriage to Leah Freudlsberger in Japan, he argued that I had said she was Jewish.  Leah's mother was Japanese.  He did admit that his wife was born in Japan.  The fact that Leah's mother was Japanese would make Esther non-Jewish, at least by Israeli law.

The following biographical sketch provides some of the most important points about the life of Shaul Eisenberg:

Biography (from

Eisenberg was active with Asia's Jewish community during World War II, not as a compatriot of the Allies but as a close intelligence and business partner of Japan's Imperial government, which was allied with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy in the Axis Alliance.

Escaping Nazi-controlled Europe, Eisenberg settled in the Far East, making his primary bases of operation Japanese-occupied Shanghai and Japan itself. In Shanghai, Eisenberg, along with Imperial Japanese military intelligence units, formed units of future Jewish terrorist groups -- the Irgun and the Shanghai Betar (Betar was founded in the 1930s by the Polish Zionist Yakob Jabotinsky, a supporter of Italian Fascist leader Benito Mussolini, to battle the British for control of Palestine and the ideological godfather of later neoconservative oracle Leo Strauss).

The Japanese taught the Jewish paramilitary forces in Shanghai, including some who escaped from Joseph Stalin's Jewish Autonomous Region creation in the Soviet Far East on the Chinese border, how to disrupt colonial occupiers' logistics and command and control elements, strategies that had been successful against the British, Dutch, French, and American colonial authorities in Asia. The Irgun and Betar gangs would eventually use the knowledge gained from the Japanese in their terror campaign against British and Arab forces in Palestine following World War II.

Eventually, Irgun and Betar veterans would form the present-day Likud Party, now headed by Binyamin Netanyahu, a noted extreme right-winger. After the war, Eisenberg began selling war surplus material, including iron and steel scrap. Married to a Japanese woman, Eisenberg established the Israel Corporation, a huge holding company , which, during the 1970s, began to secretly export Israeli military equipment and weapons to China. Under a Panama-based company called United Development, Inc., Eisenberg also began exporting weapons to Central America's most insidious dictatorships, including that of Anastasio Somoza in Nicaragua. Eisenberg's vast holdings eventually included Israel Aircraft Industries and Zim Israel Navigation Company.


to be continued...

Eric Hufschmid and Rupert Murdoch - Agents of Deception

October 21, 2010

To be, or not to be, that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles
And by opposing, end them.
- Hamlet, William Shakespeare

Saint Michael the Archangel

You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
- Jesus Christ, John 8:44 (ESV)

As an independent journalist who has investigated the false-flag terror atrocity of 9/11 since September 2001, I have certainly had to suffer "the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune."  Having been attacked at my home by three heavily-armed undercover police who broke my right elbow and TASERed me in front of my wife and 8-year-old daughter, and then having to suffer a year of malicious prosecution at the hands of Cook County's corrupt officials and overzealous Zionists, I have certainly paid a high price for my efforts to find those responsible for the false-flag terror attacks that changed the world.  I have lived in exile since June 2007, but that has not stopped the slings and arrows of slander coming from my detractors. 

I realized the limits of free speech in America when three heavily-armed undercover police broke my arm and TASERed me at my home in Hoffman Estates in August 2006.  I was charged with assaulting them and resisting arrest, although they wore neither uniforms nor badges - and refused to identify themselves.  Steven Rosenblum, the supervisor of the prosecutor's office, told a concerned citizen that he considered my writings to be anti-Jewish -- and that the prosecution would continue.

Two of the most persistent and vicious detractors are people with whom I used to work, namely Michael Piper and Eric Hufschmid.  Piper works for Mark Lane's American Free Press while Hufschmid appears to work by himself in Santa Barbara. 

Mark Lane (center), a Jewish Zionist lawyer and C.I.A. agent, owns the Liberty Lobby, the parent organization of American Free Press.

To understand why Michael Piper spends so much time slandering me, one need only understand that he works for Mark B. Lane, the Jewish Zionist lawyer who owns the assets of the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press.  Lane is responsible for instigating the mass killing at Jonestown by increasing the level of fear in Jim Jones, seen here on the left shortly before he gave the order for the massacre.  Lane is an old Army intelligence/C.I.A. agent who began his career in occupied Germany at the end of the war in 1945.  Lane earned some $5 million in legal fees representing the Liberty Lobby, and when Willis Carto nearly bankrupted the lobby in 1993 Mark Lane had plenty of cash to take over its assets.  Lane is the intelligence agent who gives Piper his marching orders and provides him with his license to lie.  The whole thing is a C.I.A. disinformation and controlled opposition operation, very similar to the National Zeitung in Germany.  For decades the erstwhile Spotlight had a monopoly on the so-called "patriot" press.


During the past year Hufschmid, whose despicable lunacy seems to know no bounds, had Estonian-speaking agents call my wife's relatives in Estonia.  These people told my wife's relatives that we had been kidnapped!  Because we don't live in Estonia, this harassment worried her father a great deal before he passed away about a month ago.   Hufschmid's behavior is beyond despicable.

There is, however, a method to this evil madness and in this article I will try to explain the method and focus on Hufschmid's relationship with the family of Rupert Murdoch, the world's most powerful media mogul.  It is worth noting that agents like Piper and Hufschmid act as if they have a license to lie, and do so with impunity.  The purpose of writing this article is to try to help readers make sense of the confusing slander that has been spread about me by these two agents - and why they continue to attack me.   Because the reader who does not know me will certainly be baffled by the vicious slander coming from Piper and Hufschmid, it is necessary for me "
to take arms against a sea of troubles, and by opposing, end them."

Eric Hufschmid has spread ridiculous and malicious lies about me since the summer of 2007...

...saying that we have been kidnapped and that my research is "Zionist bait" that should be avoided.  I only began writing my book. Solving 9/11, in the fall of 2007.

From my perspective as an honest 9/11 investigator and journalist, I see things a bit differently than a person who is not engaged in such research.  I have seen very clearly that Piper and Hufschmid use similar disinformation tactics in their attacks against me and my research.  They are certainly not attacking me because my research is faulty or off the mark.  Their relentless campaigns of slander and lies about me are intended to confuse people and sow suspicion about me and my credibility.  Why would they be doing that?  

Like Piper, Hufschmid wrote a book about 9/11 which was meant to give him some standing in the 9/11 truth movement.  Having written a book to gain entree to the 9/11 movement, Hufschmid then acted like a one-man wrecking crew, a rabid dog attacking honest researchers like Dr. Steven E. Jones - and me.  By sowing doubt and suspicion in the reader's mind, Hufschmid effectively weakened the cohesiveness of the 9/11 movement.  By attacking me personally, he has sought to marginalize my research, which he had posted on his website prior to 2007.  One of the basic tactics used by intelligence agencies to neutralize opposition groups such as the 9/11 truth movement, is to infiltrate the group and radicalize it.  This is done to marginalize the movement, reduce its credibility, and weaken its effect.  This is precisely what Eric Hufschmid has done for the past 5 years.  The real question is who is he working for?


Hufschmid's bizarre behavior raises the question whether he is working with the Zionist agent of the Rothschild family, Rupert Murdoch, who happens to be his sister's father-in-law.  Alan Colmes, a talking head from FOX News, interviewed me in 2003 and tried to smear me as an anti-Semite, not for what I had written but because I wrote for American Free Press.  The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) used the same method of guilt by association when they first accused me of being an anti-Semite in November 2001 because of my first articles about Israeli involvement in 9/11.  Using an editing trick, CNN tried to frame me as an anti-Semite in January 2007, the day before my trial was to begin, when they interviewed me for the Paula Zahn show.  I am not an anti-Semite, but if the Zionist-controlled media can portray me as one they are able to marginalize my 9/11 research as the product of an irrational "hater", which I certainly am not.  Here, Hufschmid comes in handy with his outrageous racial and anti-Semitic comments on his website.  If they can link me with him, the Zionist media can smear me as an anti-Semite by association.   This is why I was compelled to publicly distance myself from Hufschmid and the "French Connection" in 2006.  Because Hufschmid's intended result is exactly what Murdoch wants, the question arises - are they working together?


When the history of our era is written, it will be described as a period of illegal wars of aggression which the public had been woefully deceived into supporting through false-flag terrorism, lies, and the deceptive propaganda of the Rothschild-owned and controlled mass media.  Rupert Murdoch, owner of FOX News and News Corporation, will certainly be remembered as one of the most egregious agents of deception.  FOX News network, the leading cable news network in the United States, is responsible for having deceived a large segment of the population with its Zionist propaganda machine.  Thousands of Americans have lost their lives or been wounded, physically and psychologically, as a result of the pro-war propaganda they were exposed to on FOX News.

Keith Rupert Murdoch - Zionist agent of the Rothschilds

I can’t say I have been chosen by God. But tonight I can say this: I am honored to be chosen by His people for this award.
– Rupert Murdoch to the Anti-Defamation League, October 13, 2010

When Murdoch recently received an award from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of the B'nai B'rith (the real Elders of Zion), he looked very thin and unwell.  In his speech, Murdoch chose to quote Vladimir Jabotinsky, the Zionist founder of Betar and the Irgun, the notorious terrorist group that has ravaged Palestine since the 1930s.  The Likud party, which rules Israel today, was created by Irgun terrorists.  Jabotinsky was also the author of "The Iron Wall", which called for a wall of iron to be built between Jews and non-Jews in Palestine, just like the wall built by Ariel Sharon across the Holy Land.

Rupert Murdoch and Abraham Foxman, national chairman of the ADL, in New York on October 13, 2010

My own perspective is simple: We live in a world where there is an ongoing war against the Jews… The battleground is everywhere:  the media, multinational organizations, NGOs.
– Rupert Murdoch, October 13, 2010

The false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the war in Afghanistan are two sides of the same criminal deception and Rupert Murdoch has been a key promoter of both.  9/11 was designed to kick-start the war in Afghanistan and the logic of waging the war depends on the success or failure in selling the deception that Al Qaida was responsible for the terror attacks.  This is where Murdoch's FOX News has played a central role in propagandizing the American people.  His efforts to push Americans to wage war in the Middle East and Afghanistan are not unlike those of the Soviet propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg of the second World War who urged the Soviet soldiers to slaughter German civilians without mercy.  Rupert Murdoch, however, a Rothschild-funded media mogul, reaches many more people.

When I read about the Americans who have been killed or wounded in Afghanistan and Iraq, I often see how they have been deceived into going to war thinking they are fighting the terrorists who carried out the 9/11 atrocity.   Nothing could be further from the truth, but this is the pack of lies that has been pushed on the American public by the government and media for the past 9 years. The Zionist-controlled media has played the leading role in foisting this deception on the American people and the world, and Rupert Murdoch's FOX News (and News Corp.) has led the way with its super-aggressive non-stop war mongering.

When the question of waging war was being debated prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, every one of the editors who worked for Murdoch's international network of newspapers supported the Zionist war policy. Murdoch's news outlets are well known for pushing the lies about 9/11 and promoting war policies across the Middle East. Why does Murdoch seek to promote war by controlling the editors of his media network with such strict dictates?

Murdoch's role as the key Zionist propagandist comes from his creation as a media mogul by Jacob Rothschild and his family. The Rothschilds created the Murdoch media empire because they needed to have control of the major media outlets in the United States and Britain.  When Murdoch's son James became CEO of BskyB (Sky) in Britain in 2003, under his father the Chairman of the Board, a new position was made for Jacob Rothschild, the banker, as Vice Chairman.  The 4th Baron Rothschild, unofficial head of British Jewry, was not going to let the Murdochs exercise complete control of this most important British propaganda network.

Jacob Rothschild, who maintains strong personal and business links with Henry Kissinger, knows Rupert Murdoch well, having been friends since the Australian newspaper proprietor first came to Britain in the 1960s.

"We are not just a venture capital business. There is a strategic purpose to our investments…Our ability to build alliances is key. We partner with strong players.''
- James Murdoch, May 2000

The global Murdoch media empire was created with Rothschild funding and exists to spread Zionist propaganda among the English-speaking populations of the world.  Murdoch's son James is in line to take over at the helm of their media empire although it is quite likely that the empire will not survive very long after Rupert Murdoch passes away.  James Murdoch (whose mother is the Estonian Anna Tõrv) is married to Kathryn Anne Hufschmid, the daughter of Edward E. Hufschmid and Helen M. Satterthwaite.  Edward Hufschmid is also the father of Eric Hufschmid, the purported author of Painful Questions.

Rupert Murdoch with his sons and their wives.  James and Kathryn Hufschmid Murdoch are on the right.  Kathryn, a photo model, worked for Bob Guccione Jr., son of the publisher of Penthouse magazine, when she was introduced to James in 1998.

Kathryn Hufschmid worked with Bob Guccione's Gear magazine. 

"According to Gear's Kathryn Hufschmid, about 5,000 copies of the new magazine will be available in Australia by mid-August - in direct competition with the likes of GQ, Esquire and Rolling Stone…Mr Guccione has created Gear with unidentified backers and personal funds from last year's sale of Spin magazine for $US43 million ($69 million). Ms Hufschmid said Gear would address all the typical issues of interest to men - sex, fashion, music, movies, television, gadgets, cars and health and fitness."
- The Australian, July 16, 1998


Edward E. Hufschmid, the father of Kathryn and Eric, was an accomplished writer, editor, and member of the National Collegiate Honor Society at Rutgers in 1953.  Hufschmid, who was born in 1928, received honors for his thesis, “Poetry and Its Techniques: A Psychoanalytic Approach.”

Helen M. Satterthwaite, the second wife of Edward Hufschmid, as a teenager at the Culter Academy of Los Angeles in 1953.  Helen later became Anneka Hufschmid and the mother of Kathryn Anne Hufschmid.

I have met Rupert Murdoch, Eric Hufschmid, and his father Edward.  When I visited Eric at his home in Goleta, near Santa Barbara, his father would come to his house every day to work with him in their joint effort to sell the book.  Eric never told me what his father's occupation was, or had been.  Hufschmid, who is very keen on the value of data bases, keeps a list of everyone who bought the book.  Given Edward Hufschmid's history as a writer and editor-in-chief at Rutgers, I wonder if he is the real author of Painful Questions?  Eric, after all, did not even go to college and has not written anything like it - before or since.  Furthermore, his interest in 9/11 has completely evaporated since 2005, when he told me that I should stop wasting my time investigating the subject.  How much sense does that make?

Eric told me that his sister had left Santa Barbara - and Mr. Hufschmid - with her mother because they had money problems.  This is probably not all of the story.  Kathryn, who was born in 1971, when Eric was about 16, lived in Eugene and Salem, Oregon during the 1990s in close proximity to her father, who lived in Corvallis.  Kathryn's mother was Helen M. Satterthwaite, who apparently changed her name to Anneka M. Hufschmid.  Anneka, who grew up in Los Angeles, lived with her daughter in modest circumstances in Eugene, where she passed away in 1998, at age 59.  Kathryn named her daughter, born in Hong Kong in 2003, after her mother.

I met Rupert Murdoch and his family in the late 1980s when I worked as a ski guide and wine steward at the Pine Creek Cookhouse at Ashcroft, in the highlands of Aspen, Colorado.  I lived in the old ghost town of Ashcroft for two glorious winters.

The old hotel of Ashcroft, Colorado

Christopher Bollyn skiing at Ashcroft (ca. 1988)

I enjoyed working at the Pine Creek Cookhouse because I love the great outdoors and cross country skiing, which I learned in Norway.  One afternoon, the Murdoch family wanted a guide to ski with them back down from the restaurant.  I volunteered eagerly.  Nobody else at the cookhouse was interested or seemed to know who Rupert Murdoch was.  It took about 30 minutes to ski the Murdoch family down the hill and I was able to talk to Murdoch about his media acquisitions in the United States, such as the Sun-Times of Chicago.  His sons were in their early teens and would certainly remember skiing with me at the Pine Creek Cookhouse.  

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"The Bollyn Trial: The Criminalization of an Outspoken Journalist", June 29, 2007

"Guccione's Gear is new kid on a crowded block" by Clive Mathieson, The Australian, July 16, 1998

The Crusader, 1953 yearbook of Culter Academy, Los Angeles, California

The Scarlet Letter, 1953 yearbook of Rutger College, New Brunswick, New Jersey

Disinformation from Eric Hufschmid:

"July 2010 update on Christopher Bollyn and family" by Eric Hufschmid

"Bollyn Kidnapping Info" by Eric Hufschmid

"What happened to the Bollyn family?" by Eric Hufschmid, September 5, 2007

Who Destroyed the 9/11 Evidence?

Updated December 25, 2010

During the past few months I have been researching the Rothschild/Mossad network behind the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.  I have found that the network that arranged for the destruction of the steel - critical evidence from the crime scene - was actually organized by Israel's Mossad and their Zionist agents, the real culprits behind the false-flag terrorism that changed the world.  This article will be the final and conclusive chapter of my book, Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World

On Saturday, December 18, I discussed my research about the destruction of the steel of the World Trade Center with Kevin Barrett on his radio show.  The following day, a blogger called "Gretavo" posted the following comment on his website,

some of what smells fishy to me...
Submitted by gretavo on Sun, 2010-12-19 11:21.

Christopher Bollyn re-appears with very convoluted series of connections that he claims prove a Mossad connection to the destruction of steel. And also to "military applications of thin coatings" -- as if painted on nanothermite were conclusively proven to have been used.

Who is Gretavo Verdadero? is a question that has been taken up by others.  Why would a person interested in 9/11 truth use an utterly fake name that means "greatest truther" in Spanish?  Gretavo is evidently Gustavo A. Espada, a Puerto Rican whose father, Luis Espada-Platet, works for the U.S. State Department and who has served in numerous high-level positions representing the U.S. government in Nicaragua, Portugal, Mexico, etc., according to this article in the Harvard Crimson.

Gustavo A. Espada, a.k.a. "Gretavo Verdadero", has written on Kevin Barrett's site in support of Academic Freedom

In 2004, a posting suggested that Espada worked undercover for the C.I.A. at Harvard: 

Posted by: Rebel at Sep 27, 2004 20:04

If I remember clearly, Gustavo Espada was raised in US Embassies in Columbia, Brazil and Nicaragua where he had much contact with and was protected by the CIA.

I also seem to remember Gustavo Espada filming activists in Cambridge, MA and providing the film to the very operation the article is about: KOBE. That film was used to harass activists, including DeVoy.

Gustavo Espada's father currently works in the US Embassy in Nicaragua (Consul General). Evidence supports the belief that he works for the CIA undercover at Harvard University."

Gustavo Espada was the webmaster of KOBE, an anti-Muslim website.  Reportedly, "Gustavo Espada of KOBE infiltrated an anarchist group in Harvard Square and assisted authorities in attempting to frame Boston activists in various crimes.  Pretending to be a member of the anarchist group, he took advantage of their trust to videotape them and then provide doctored photos to hate organizations for the purposes of harassment and defamation."

If the Israeli Mossad connections to the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center sound convoluted it is only because I have not been clear enough in my explanations.  (Gretavo apparently also fails to understand the very clear evidence presented in Dr. Steven E. Jones' scientific paper on the discovery of super-Thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center.)  The following two points are the basis of the Mossad connection to the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center:

1.  Two orthodox Zionist Jews from Belgium, Jehuda Saar and Nathan Fruchter, worked with senior Mossadnik Marc Rich (another Israeli/Belgian Jew) since the mid-1990s in Stamford, Connecticut, in the trading of metals and other materials.  In January 1999, Rich sent these two traders to create and manage an international trading division at Hugo Neu, the scrap metal dealer of New Jersey who handled much of the steel (evidence from the crime scene) from the World Trade Center.  Marc Rich has long worked for the Mossad and with the Bush family.  The Marc Rich foundations are managed by a high-level Mossad agent named Avner Azulay.  The Saar-Fruchter international trading division at Hugo Neu was the Mossad network through which the 300,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center were "recycled" in Asian steel mills.  The steel was cut up into small pieces about two meters long before being sent to Chinese and Indian steel mills, which means that the steel evidence from the Twin Towers was being destroyed in the scrap yard of Hugo Neu before it was loaded onto ships bound for China.

Avner Azulay of the Mossad...

manages the Marc Rich foundations

2.  The Hugo Neu scrap metal company (created by the German Jew, Hugo Neu, a Rothschild agent in 1947) is a major investor in an Israeli venture capital fund called the Aqua Agro fund.  The Aqua Agro fund is headed by Nir Belzer, who also heads an Israeli fund called the MMT fund.  The MMT fund is primarily invested in nanotechnology projects that create materials precisely like the nanocomposite form of Thermite that destroyed the World Trade Center.  Oren Gafri, one of the three managers of the MMT fund, is a specialist in creating such coatings and has worked and trained at Ben Gurion University and Israel's nuclear lab in the Negev Desert where energetic nano-composite coatings are developed.  The chips of the bi-layered coating found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center are solid evidence of the extremely high-energy coating that destroyed the Twin Towers.  Energetic coatings of super-Thermite are developed at Ben Gurion University and Israel's nuclear lab in the Negev.  This is Oren Gafri's field of specialization.

On 19 November 2010 I sent photographs of Jehuda Saar and Nathan Fruchter, two orthodox Zionist Belgian Jews and two of the main people involved in the Mossad "recycling" of the 300,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center, to Roy Tov, the Christian Israeli author of The Cross of Bethlehem

Jehuda Saar taking out the garbage before he moved to Israel from Teaneck, New Jersey in 2006.  Saar "trashed" 300,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center for the Mossad...

along with his Israeli-Belgian buddy, Nathan K. Fruchter.

I sent these photos of the culprits behind the criminal destruction of the steel to Tov because he is very knowledgable about the Mossad, having been pursued and targeted by Israeli assassins around the world.  This is what Roy Tov wrote back to me on November 21:

Thanks Christopher,

If the pictures are real, then there is little doubt regarding their allies and employers. The chances they'll answer in such case are slim, or it will be in the form of an attack (lawyers or violent) against you.

In September, when I began my research into the Zionist network behind the destruction of the steel, I called the Hugo Neu company, which was one of the two New Jersey scrapyards that "recycled" the steel.  Hugo Neu was a German Jewish immigrant from Fürth (like Henry Kissinger, another Rothschild agent) who came to America and worked as a bank clerk with Seligman & Co. before becoming the head of Associated Metals and Minerals Corporation (AMMC) in New York in the 1930s with his German Jewish fellows, Meno Lissauer and Walter M. Rothschild, the company's president.  Lissauer's wife, Meta, was also Walter Rothschild's sister.  Hugo Neu started his own scrap metal company in 1945.  The company is now run by his son, John, and has very close business ties to the state of Israel and is invested in a Mossad-linked Israeli venture fund.

Since 2001, the two companies involved in the destruction of the steel, Sims Metal Management and Hugo Neu, have merged into one company.  I called and asked to speak with Alan Ratner, the former head of Metal Management in New Jersey, Daniel Dienst, or Robert Kelman, since these were the key executives involved in the 9/11 steel recycling.  I got through to Ratner's secretary, who gave me his email, but instead of letting me speak to any of these men, I was connected to company's spokesman, Daniel Strechay.

Daniel Strechay is the corporate gatekeeper who speaks for the company who profited from the illegal destruction of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center.

Strechay was completely unwilling to answer any questions.  I told him that the destruction of the steel is a matter of great historic importance and that in the interest of fairness and accuracy I wanted to speak directly with the people involved.  Strechay refused, saying "It's all a matter of public record.  Read the Wall Street Journal."

He then said that the company is very proud of how it handled the steel from the Twin Towers, but was adamant in his refusal to let me speak with any of the men who were actually involved in the operation, and hung up the phone.  Later, I got through to Alan Ratner by email and he wrote back, so I sent him a few questions, but he has yet to respond.  Clearly, these men do not want to discuss their roles in the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.

I called Kenneth Holden at his home in Scarsdale, New York, on October 16, to ask him some questions about his role in the clean-up of the debris at the World Trade Center.  Holden is the former head of New York City's Department of Design and Construction (DDC), and was the official who oversaw the removal of the steel.  As Mayor Bloomberg said about Commissioner Holden, when he was reappointed as head of the DDC in January 2002:

New Yorkers are fortunate to have Commissioner Holden agree to remain as Commissioner of DDC," said Mayor Bloomberg. "Over the last four months he has done a terrific job managing the clean up of the World Trade Center and so that the reconstruction process for Lower Manhattan can begin. By coordinating the movement of millions of tons of steel and rubble, excavating one of the most dangerous work sites in the world all seemingly ahead of schedule, under budget and without a fatality, Kenneth Holden has been the unsung hero of this enormous task."

Kenneth Holden - Mayor Bloomberg's "Unsung Hero" of the 9/11 Clean-Up


When Holden gave his statement to the 9/11 Commission on April 1, 2003, he said he had received "verbal permission" to remove the steel to New Jersey scrapyards, but failed to give the name of the person who had authorized the destruction of the evidence.  Oddly, nobody asked Holden who gave him permission to send the steel to the Zionist-controlled scrapyards who destroyed the evidence:

Steel and debris from the site was sent to Fresh Kills where it was examined and sifted. As the Department of Sanitation could no longer handle the steel with their equipment, and our engineers thought the steel would destabilize the landfill, DDC received verbal permission to ship the steel to New Jersey. (From whom? CB) By the end of June 2002, an astounding total of over 1.6 million tons of steel and other debris were removed from the site.

It was Saturday morning when I reached Holden at his home.  I told him I was working on an article about the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center and wanted to ask him a few questions.  He bawked a bit at first, saying that he was no longer giving interviews on the subject, so I repeated what he told the commission and asked the most important question first:  Who gave you the verbal permission to ship the steel to New Jersey scrapyards?  I was able to repeat the question twice very clearly.  After a short pause Holden said, "As I said, I'm not giving interviews on this subject."  Then he silently ended the call.

I thought for a minute and called Holden right back.  He picked up the phone and I immediately asked, "Was it Chertoff?  Was it Michael Chertoff who gave you the verbal permission?"  Holden was silent on the other end of the line, then he ended the call as he had done before. 

"Silence is agreement" is an old Estonian saying that comes to mind.  The logic is that Holden could not deny that Chertoff had given him the verbal permission, so he remained silent.  Common sense would suggest that the permission must have come from Chertoff, who as Assistant Attorney General of the United States was the top dog responsible for the federal (FBI) investigation of 9/11.  

Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff was "top dog" at the FBI during the "non-investigation" of 9/11, in which the crucial steel evidence was destroyed in Asian smelters before being examined by engineers.  Chertoff's Israeli mother, Livia Eisen, was one of the first Mossad agents.  An Israeli by birth, Michael spent much of his childhood in Israel.

To understand the essence of the crime, I recommend reading the short article "Selling Out the Investigation" by Bill Manning of Fire Engineering.  Manning's piece was published on January 1, 2002.  The destruction of the steel was a crucial part of the 9/11 hoax.  A hoax cannot succeed if there is evidence that reveals the truth -- and 9/11 is a global hoax.

The Twin Towers were primarily steel structures supporting 220 lightweight concrete floors. 

The towers were well built structures that used more steel than today's skyscrapers.  The debris contained about 300,000 tons of steel that was hastily dispatched by a New York City official to two Zionist-controlled scrapyards in New Jersey - before it could even be inspected by engineers.  These Jewish-owned scrapyards then shipped the steel - hard evidence from the crime scene - to Asian smelters where it was melted down far from the prying eyes of U.S. investigators.  Why was this allowed and who was behind it?

An organization called the NYC Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN) is calling for the public to demand that the district attorney of New York County investigate and prosecute those responsible for the destruction of the evidence from the crime scene.  This is from their open letter/petition of June 23, 2010 to the district attorney's office:

Cy Vance, Jr. District Attorney of New York County
Thomas Wornom, Bureau Chief, Special Prosecutions Bureau

Dear Sirs:

Over the last three weeks you have been informed about the overwhelming evidence that World Trade Center Building 7 was demolished with explosives. I trust that you understand the serious implications of this crime and that you are resolved to prosecute the guilty parties. To provide a critical steppingstone in your investigation, I would like to bring to your attention the widely documented – and widely protested – destruction of physical evidence (structural steel) at the crime scene, which I contend is prosecutable pursuant to Article 205 of the New York Penal Code, § 205.50 Hindering Prosecution.

“[A] person ‘renders criminal assistance’ when, with intent to prevent, hinder or delay the discovery or apprehension of…a person he knows or believes has committed a crime…he...suppresses, by any act of concealment, alteration or destruction, any physical evidence which might aid in the discovery or apprehension of such person or in the lodging of a criminal charge against him;”

I will present publicly available information on the destruction of physical evidence from the World Trade Center site, below my signature, in four sections entitled:

      1. Official acknowledgement of the destruction of physical evidence from the WTC.
      2. Control of the WTC cleanup.
      3. The decision to destroy the physical evidence.
      4. The continued destruction of evidence despite public outcry

The supporting documentation provided in this letter/petition from NYC CAN includes the following:

“In the month that lapsed between the terrorist attacks and the deployment of the [FEMA Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT Team)], a significant amount of steel debris—including most of the steel from the upper floors—was removed from the rubble pile, cut into smaller sections, and either melted at the recycling plant or shipped out of the U.S. Some of the critical pieces of steel—including the suspension trusses from the top of the towers and the internal support columns—were gone before the first BPAT team member ever reached the site. Fortunately, an NSF-funded independent researcher, recognizing that valuable evidence was being destroyed, attempted to intervene with the City of New York to save the valuable artifacts, but the city was unwilling to suspend the recycling contract.”
- Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives, March 6, 2002

“[T]here is so much that has been lost in these last six months that we can never go back and retrieve. And that is not only unfortunate, it is borderline criminal.”
- Joseph Crowley, U.S. Congressman, 7th District, New York

“[O]n September 28, the New York Times learned that the city was recycling the steel. When the Times contacted Kenneth R. Holden, commissioner of the Department of Design and Construction, he said that no one from the investigative team had asked him to keep or inspect the steel. The ASCE, it turned out, had faxed a request, but to the wrong fax machine. Late that afternoon, after reporters shuttled the correct fax number to the ASCE, Holden said that a request had finally reached him."

Commissioner Kenneth R. Holden and his wife Frances McGuire.  Holden was given an award in 2002 by the AIA New York Chapter after he had overseen the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.  Why was he being awarded when he should have been arrested?

By September 28, the DDC is publicly known to have been aware of the BPAT’s request for the steel to be saved, however, the decision to recycle the steel stood.

Of course, Mayor Giuliani – previously a U.S. Attorney – and the DDC had to be fully aware of the illegality of destroying the physical evidence prior to their decision to recycle the steel. Their refusal to desist from recycling the steel when asked by the investigative team to do so – still less than three weeks into the cleanup effort, with hundreds of thousands of tons of steel still salvageable, and relatively negligible revenue from selling the steel not an issue because there was virtually unlimited federal funding for the cleanup effort – strongly suggests their contravention of the law was deliberate and motivated by intent to prevent the discovery of a crime they knew had taken place...

Calls to halt the recycling fell on deaf ears. According to Times reporters Glanz and Lipton:

“Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to written and oral requests for comment over a three-day period about who decided to recycle the steel and the concern that the decision might be handicapping the investigation. ‘The city considered it reasonable to have recovered structural steel recycled,’ said Matthew G. Monahan, a spokesman for the city's Department of Design and Construction, which is in charge of debris removal at the site”

Why didn’t the city simply stop recycling the steel? Again, the outright refusal of city officials to desist from recycling the steel strongly suggests their contravention of the law was deliberate and motivated by intent to prevent the discovery of a crime they knew had taken place.

I strongly support the NYC CAN petition to prosecute those behind the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.  My forthcoming article will reveal the key people involved in the terror network behind this crime.

In the meantime, I recommend visiting the website of NYC CAN to understand the basis of their appeal for justice and the extent of the criminal destruction of evidence from the World Trade Center:

Iranian President Calls for 9/11 Investigation

September 27, 2010

All values, even the freedom of expression, in Europe and in the United States are being sacrificed at the altar of Zionism.
-  Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at the United Nations, September 23, 2010

A Voice of Reason - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the need to investigate 9/11:  "Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?"

A radical is one who speaks the truth.
- Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., U.S. Congressman and father of the famous aviator, June 15, 1957

The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear.
- Herbert Agar

Address by H.E. Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Before the 65th Session of the United Nations General Assembly
New York, 23 September 2010

All praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Universe, and peace and blessing be upon our Master and Peophet, Mohammad, and his pure Household, and his noble Companions and on all divine messengers.

Oh, God, hasten the arrival of Iman Al-Mahdi and grant him good health and victory and make us his followers and those who attest to his rightfulness.
Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am grateful to the Almighty God who granted me the opportunity to appear before this world assembly once again. I wish to begin by commemorating those who lost their lives in the horrible flood in Pakistan and express my heartfelt sympathy with the families who lost their loved ones, as well as with the people and the government of Pakistan. I urge everyone to assist their fellow men and women as a humane duty.
Let me thank H.E. Mr. Ali Abdussalam Treki, the President of the sixty-fourth session of the United Nations General Assembly, for all his efforts during his tenure. I also would like to congratulate H.E. Mr. Joseph Deiss, the President of the sixty-fifth session of the United Nations General Assembly and wish him all success.
In the past years, I spoke to you about some of the hopes and concerns, including family crises, security, human dignity, world economy, climate change as well as the aspiration for justice and [a] lasting peace. After about one hundred years of domination, the system of Capitalism and the existing world order has proved to be unable to provide appropriate solution to the problems of societies, thus coming to an end. I shall try to examine the two main causes of this failure and picture some features of the ideal future order.
A) Attitudes and Beliefs
As you are well aware, the divine prophets had the mission to call everyone to monotheism, love and justice and show mankind the path to prosperity. They invite men to contemplation and knowledge in order to better appreciate the truth and to avoid atheism and egoism. The very nature of the message of all prophets is one and the same. Every messenger endorsed the messenger before him and gave glad tidings about the prophet to come, and presented a more complete version of the religion in accordance with the capacity of the man at the time. This continued up to the last messenger of God who presented the perfect and all inclusive religion.
In opposition to that, the egotist and the greedy stood up against this clear call, revolting against the message. Nimrod countered Hazrat Abraham, Pharaoh countered Hazrat Moses and the greedy countered Hazrat Jesus Christ and Hazrat Mohammad (Peace be upon them all). In the recent centuries, the human ethics and values have been rejected as a cause for backwardness. They were even portrayed as opposing wisdom and science because of the earlier infliction on man by the proclaimers of religion in the dark ages of the West. Man's disconnection from Heaven detached him from his true self.
Man with his potentials for understanding the secrets of the universe, his instinct for seeking truth, his aspirations for justice and perfection, his quest for beauty and purity and his capacity to represent God on earth was reduced to a creature limited to the materialistic world with a mission to maximize individualistic pleasures. Human instinct, then, replaced true human nature.
Human beings and nations were considered rivals and the happiness of an individual or a nation was defined in collision with, and elimination [of] or [the] suppression of others. Constructive evolutionary cooperation was replaced with a destructive struggle for survival. The lust for capital and domination replaced monotheism which is the gate to love and unity.
This widespread clash of the egoist with the divine values gave way to slavery and colonialism. A large portion of the world came under the domination of a few western States. Tens of millions of people were taken to slavery and tens of millions of families were shattered as a result.
All the resources, the rights and the cultures of the colonized nations were plundered. Lands were occupied and the indigenous people were humiliated and mass- murdered. Yet, nations rose up, colonialism was alienated and the independence of the nations was recognized. Thus, the hope for respect, prosperity and security was revived amongst nations. In the beginning of the past century, nice talks about freedom, human rights and democracy created hopes for healing the deep wounds of the past.
Today, however, not only those dreams are not realized, but memories, even at times worse than before, have been recorded. As a result of the two World Wars, the occupation of Palestine, the Korean and the Vietnam Wars, the Iraqi war against Iran, the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq as well as many wars in Africa, hundreds of millions of people were killed, wounded or displaced.
Terrorism, illicit drugs, poverty and the social gaps increased. The dictatorial and coup d'etat governments in Latin America committed unprecedented crimes with the support of the West. Instead of disarmament, the proliferation and stockpiling of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons expanded, putting the world under a bigger threat. As a result, the very same old goals of colonialists and the slave masters were, this time around, pursued with a new facade.
B) The Global Management and Ruling Structures
The League of Nations and, then, the United Nations were established with the promise to bring about peace, security and the realization of human rights, which in fact meant a global management. One can analyze the current governance of the world by examining three events:
First, the event of the 11 September 2001 which has affected the whole world for almost a decade. All of a sudden, the news of the attack on the twin towers was broadcast using numerous footages of the incident. Almost all governments and known figures strongly condemned this incident. But then a propaganda machine came into full force; it was implied that the whole world was exposed to a huge danger, namely terrorism, and that the only way to save the world would be to deploy forces into Afghanistan. Eventually Afghanistan, and shortly thereafter, Iraq were occupied.
Please take note:
It was said that some three thousands people were killed on 11 September for which we are all very saddened. Yet, up until now, in Afghanistan and Iraq, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, millions wounded and displaced, and the conflict is still going on and expanding. In identifying those responsible for the attack, there were three viewpoints.
1- That a very powerful and complex terrorist group, able to successfully cross all layers of the American intelligence and security, carried out the attack. This is the main viewpoint advocated by American statesmen.
2- That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order also to save the Zionist regime. The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view.
3- It was carried out by a terrorist group but the American government supported and took advantage of the situation. Apparently, this viewpoint has fewer proponents. The main evidence linking the incident was a few passports found in the huge volume of rubble and a video of an individual whose place of domicile was unknown, but it was announced that he had been involved in oil deals with some American officials. It was also covered up and said that due to the explosion and fire no trace of the suicide attackers was found.
There remain, however, a few questions [to] be answered:
1- Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?
2- Assuming the viewpoint of the American government, is it rational to launch a classic war through widespread deployment of troops that led to the death of hundreds of thousands of people to counter a terrorist group?
3- Was it not possible to act the way Iran countered the Riggi terrorist group, who killed and wounded 400 innocent people in Iran. In the Iranian operation, no innocent person was hurt.
It is proposed that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of 11 September so that in the future expressing views about it is not forbidden.
I wish to announce here that next year the Islamic Republic of Iran will host a conference to study terrorism and the means to confront it. I invite officials, scholars, thinkers, researchers and research institutes of all countries to attend this conference.
Second, is the occupation of the Palestinian territories
The oppressed people of Palestine have lived under the rule of an occupying regime for 60 years, been deprived of freedom, security and the right to self-determination, while the occupiers are given recognition. On a daily basis, the houses are being destroyed over the heads of innocent women and children. People are deprived of water, food and medicine in their own homeland. The Zionists have imposed five all-out wars on the neighboring countries and on the Palestinian people.
The Zionists committed the most horrible crimes against the defenseless people in the wars against Lebanon and Gaza. The Zionist regime attacked a humanitarian flotilla in a blatant defiance of all international norms and kill[ed] civilians. This regime, which enjoys the absolute support of some western countries, regularly threatens the countries in the region and continues publicly announced assassination of Palestinian figures and others, while Palestinian defenders and those opposing this regime are pressured, labeled as terrorists and anti Semites. All values, even the freedom of expression, in Europe and in the United States are being sacrificed at the altar of Zionism.
Solutions are doomed to fail because the right of the Palestinian people is not taken into account. Would we have witnessed such horrendous crimes if instead of recognizing the occupation, the sovereign right of the Palestinian people had been recognized? Our unambiguous proposition is the return of the Palestinian refugees to their home land and the reference to the vote of the people of Palestine to exercise their sovereignty and decide on the type of governance.
Third, is the nuclear energy
Nuclear energy is clean and cheap and a heavenly gift which is amongst the most suitable alternatives to cut the pollutions emanating from fossil fuels. The Non- Proliferation Treaty (NPT) allows all member States to use nuclear energy without limits and the International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA] is mandated to provide member States with technical and legal support. The nuclear bomb is the worst inhumane weapon and must totally be eliminated. The NPT prohibits its development and stockpiling and calls for nuclear disarmament.
Nonetheless, note what some of the permanent members of the Security Council and nuclear bomb holders have done:
They have equated nuclear energy with the nuclear bomb, and have distanced this energy from the reach of most of nations by establishing monopolies and pressuring the IAEA. While at the same time, they have continued to maintain, expand and upgrade their own nuclear arsenals.
This has entailed the following:
Not only the nuclear disarmament has not been realized, but also nuclear bombs have been proliferated in some regions, including by the occupying and intimidating Zionist regime.
I would like here to propose that the year 2011 be proclaimed the year of nuclear disarmament and "Nuclear Energy for all, Nuclear Weapons for None".
In all these cases, the United Nations has been unable to take any effective course of action. Unfortunately, in the decade proclaimed as the "International Decade for the Culture of Peace", hundreds of thousands were killed and injured as a result of war, aggression and occupation, and hostilities and antagonism increased.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Very recently the world witnessed the ugly and inhumane act of burning the Holy Quran.
The Holy Quran is the Divine Book and the eternal miracle of the Prophet of lslam. It calls for worshipping the One God, justice, compassion toward people, development and progress, reflection and thinking, defending the oppressed and resisting against the oppressors; and it names with respect the previous Messengers of God, like Noah, Abraham, Isaaq, Joseph, Moses and Jesus Christ (Peace be Upon them all) and endorses them.
They burned Quran to burn all these truths and good judgments. However, the truth could not be burned. Quran is eternal because God and truth are everlasting. This act and any other act which widen the gap and distances between nations is evil. We should wisely avoid playing into the hands of Satan. On behalf of the Iranian nation I pay respect to all Divine Books and their followers.
This is the Quran and this is the Bible. I pay respect to both of them.
Esteemed Friends,
For years, the inefficiency of the capitalism and the existing world management and structures has been exposed and the majority of States and nations have been on a quest for fundamental changes and for the prevalence of justice in global relations. The cause of the United Nation's ineptitude is in its unjust structure. Major power is monopolized in the Security Council due to the veto privilege, and the main pillar of the Organization, namely the General Assembly, is marginalized.
In the past several decades, at least one of the permanent members of the Security Council has always been a party to the disputes. The veto advantage grants impunity to aggression and occupation; How could, therefore, one expect competence while both the judge and the prosecutor are a party to the dispute?
Had Iran enjoyed veto privilege, would the Security Council and the IAEA Director General have taken the same position in the nuclear issue?
Dear Friends,
The United Nations is the key center for coordinating the common global management. Its structure needs to be reformed in a manner that all independent States and nations [are] able to participate in the global governance actively and constructively.
The veto privilege should be revoked and the General Assembly should be the highest body and the Secretary-General should be the most independent official and all his positions and activities should be taken with the approval of the General Assembly and should be directed towards promoting justice and eliminating discrimination.
The Secretary-General should not come under pressure from powers and/or the country hosting the Organization for his stating the truth and [the] administration of justice. It is suggested that the General Assembly should, within one year and in the framework of an extraordinary session, finalize the reformation of the Organization's structure. The Islamic Republic of Iran has clear suggestions in this regard and stands ready to participate actively and constructively in the process.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I announce clearly that the occupation of other countries under the pretext of freedom and democracy is an unforgivable crime. The world needs the logic of compassion and justice and inclusive participation instead of [the] logic of force, domination, unilateralism, war and intimidation. The world needs to be governed by virtuous people like the Divine Prophets. The two vast geographical spheres, namely Africa and Latin America, have gone through historic developments during the past decades. The new approaches in these two continents, which are based on increasing level of integration and unity as well as on localizing the growth and development models, have born considerable fruits to the peoples of those regions. The awareness and wisdom of the leaders of these two continents has overcome the regional problems and crises without the domineering interference of non-regional powers.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has expanded its relations with the Latin America and Africa in all aspects in recent years.
And about the glorious Iran, The Tehran Declaration was a hugely constructive step in confidence building efforts which was made possible through the admirable good will by the governments of Brazil and Turkey along with the sincere cooperation of the Iranian government. Although the Declaration received inappropriate reaction by some and was followed by an unlawful resolution, it is still valid. We have observed the regulations of the IAEA more than our commitments, yet, we have never submitted to illegally imposed pressures nor will we ever do so.
It has been said that they want to pressure Iran into a dialogue. Well, firstly, Iran has always been ready for a dialogue based on respect and justice. Secondly, methods based on disrespecting nations have long become ineffective. Those who have used intimidation and sanctions in response to the clear logic of the Iranian nation are in real terms destroying the remaining credibility of the Security Council and the trust of nations for this body, proving once and again how unjust is the function of the Council.
When they threaten a great nation such as Iran which is known throughout history for its scientists, poets, artists and philosophers and whose culture and civilization is synonymous to purity, submission to God and seeking justice, how can they ever expect that other nations grow confidence on them?
It goes without saying that domineering methods in managing the world has failed. Not only has the era of slavery and colonialism and dominating the world passed, the path to the reviving old Empires are blocked, too. We have announced that we stand ready for a serious and free debate with the American Statesmen to express our transparent views on issues of importance to the world in this very venue. It is proposed here that in order to have a constructive dialogue, an annual free debate be organized within the General Assembly.
In conclusion,
Friends and Colleagues,
The Iranian nation and the majority of the world's nations and governments are against the current discriminatory management of the world. The inhumane nature of this management has put it at a dead-end and requires a major overhaul. Reforming the world's affairs and bringing about tranquility and prosperity requires the participation of all, pure thoughts and the divine and humane management.
We are all of the idea that:
Justice is the basic element for peace, durable security and the spread of love among peoples and nations. It is in the justice that mankind seeks the realization of his aspirations, rights and dignity, since he is wary of oppression, humiliation and ill treatment. The true nature of mankind is manifested in the love for other fellow humans and love for all the good in the world. Love is the best foundation for establishing relation amongst people and amongst nations.
As Vahshi Bafqi, the great Iranian poet, says:
"From the fountain of youth, drink thousand sips You'll still die if you don't have love's grip"
In making a world full of purity, safety and prosperity people are not rivals, but companions. Those who see their happiness but in the sorrow of others and their welfare and safety but in others' insecurity, those who see themselves superior to others, are out of the path of humanity and are in evil's course.
Economy and materialistic means are only some tools to serve others, to create friendship and strengthen human connections for spiritual perfection. They are not tools for show-off or means of dominating others. Men and women complements each other and family unit with pure, loving and long-lasting relation of the spouses in its center is the guarantee for the continuity and the bringing up generations, for true pleasures, for spreading love and for reforming of the societies.
Woman is a reflection of God's beauty and is the source of love and caring. She is the guardian of purity and exquisiteness of the society. The tendency to toughen the souls and behaviors of women deprives them from their very basic right of being a loving mother and a caring wife. It would result in a more violent society with irreversible defects. Freedom is a divine right that should serve peace and human perfection. Pure thoughts and the will of the righteous are keys to the gates of a pure life full of hope, liveliness and beauty.
This is the promise of God that the earth will be inherited by the pure and the righteous. And the people free from selfishness will take up the management of the world. Then, there will be no trace of sorrow, discrimination, poverty, insecurity and aggression. The time for true happiness and for the blossoming of the true nature of humankind, the way God has intended, will arrive.
All those seeking for justice and all the free spirits have been waiting for this moment and have promised such glorious time.
The complete human, the true servant of God and the true friend of the mankind whose father was from the generation of the beloved Prophet of Islam and whose mother was from the true believers of the Jesus Christ, shall wait along with Jesus the son of Marry and the other righteous to appear on those brilliant times and assist the humanity.
In welcoming them we should join ranks and seek justice. Praise to Love and worship, praise to justice and freedom, praise to the true humanity, the complete human, the true companion of the humankind and peace be upon you and all the righteous and the pure.
Thank you.
Islamic Republic of Iran
Permanent Mission to the United Nations

Firefighters Call for 9-11 Truth

An Appeal to Firefighters, Present and Past from a retired FDNY Lieutenant

Fellow Firefighters:

A great tragedy befell our community on September 11, 2001, an unprecedented 343 deaths in the line of duty. As horrible as that toll is, if there were a rational explanation for it, we could accept it and mourn. We all understood the risk we accepted when we took the oath of office, that chance might cut short our lives when we placed ourselves in harm’s way in the public’s service. This is what we are paid for and it is our honor.

However, in short, the official explanation of the events of that day are not only insufficient, they are fantastic and cannot bear rational examination. We are asked to believe that on that day three structural steel buildings, which have never before in history collapsed because of fire, fell neatly into their basements at the speed of gravity, their concrete reduced to dust. We are asked to believe that jet fuel (kerosene) can melt steel.

We are asked to believe that the most sophisticated air defense system in the world, that responded to sixty-eight emergencies in the year prior to 9-11 in less than twenty minutes allowed aircraft to wander about for up to an hour and a half. We are asked to believe that the steel and titanium components of an aircraft that supposedly hit the Pentagon “evaporated”.

There is much, much more if anyone cares to look into it. Trade Tower #7 by itself is the “smoking gun”. Not hit by an aircraft, with only a few relatively small fires, it came down in a classic crimp and implosion, going straight into its basement, something only very precise demolition can accomplish, which takes days if not weeks to prepare. The 9-11 Commission didn’t even mention it, and F.E.M.A. actually stated they DIDN’T KNOW WHY IT COLLAPSED AND LEFT IT AT THAT. Brothers, I know that the implications of the above are hard, almost unthinkable, but the official explanation is utter nonsense, and three hundred and forty three murdered brothers are crying out for justice. Demand a genuine investigation into the events of September 11!

-Anton Vodvarka, Lt. FDNY (ret), August 20, 2008

Lt. Vodvarka served on FDNY Ladder Co 26, Rescue Co. 3, Rescue Co. 1, Engine Co. 92, Ladder 82 and Ladder 101. He was awarded the Merit Class 1 award, the Prentice Medal.


9/11: The Unidentified Murder Weapons

October 13, 2010

Here is another excellent video by Anthony Lawson about 9/11 truth, entitled "9/11: The Unidentified Murder Weapons."

Mr. Lawson wrote: 

The four aircraft which crashed on September 11th, 2001 have never been forensically matched to the four passenger planes which were allegedly hijacked that morning. Requests under the Freedom of Information Act have met with denials and refusals, and documents which have been produced, allegedly using data from the only three “Black Box” flight recorders said to have been found, have no serial numbers of the devices listed on them.

The destruction of the jet engines and other parts from the airliners from the World Trade Center, which can be seen in the video, reveals that the mass murder atrocity of 9/11 was never treated as a crime that needed to be investigated.  This is why I call the government role the "non-investigation" of 9/11.  Why would the F.B.I. and the U.S. Department of Justice allow parts of the airplanes and the steel to be destroyed?  Why would Michael Chertoff, then Assistant Attorney of Justice in charge of the criminal section of the Dept. of Justice, permit the wholesale destruction of the evidence from the World Trade Center? 

The numbered parts of the jet engines found in the debris would identify the precise airplane involved at each of the four crash sites.  Why were they all destroyed?  I can think of only one reason - the planes that were involved in the terror attacks of 9/11 were NOT the planes the government says they were.  To understand this part of the deception read the second chapter of Solving 9/11 - "The Planes of 9/11"



9/11: Towards a UN Inquiry Commision

October 2, 2010

9/11: Towards a UN inquiry commission
Communiqué by Thierry Meyssan

On September 11, 2001 the world watched helplessly as the attacks that plunged the United States into mourning took place. Against all logic, the Bush Administration attributed them to an Islamist plot hatched by a group of fanatics inside a cave in Afghanistan. This accusation was exploited to justify a war against terrorism that was to start in Afghanistan and Iraq and extend, according to President Bush, to 60 countries.

In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, I initiated an international debate to challenge that rendition of the events and to condemn the logic of the "clash of civilizations". In 2002, I appealed for the establishment of a United Nations commmission of investigation into 9/11. In 2005, through the Axis for Peace conference, I layed the foundation for an international movement of intellectuals opposed to this domination agenda.

In the same spirit, on 23 September 2010, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called on the United Nations General Assembly to appoint a 9/11 fact-finding commission. In addition, he announced that a world conference against terrorism will be convened in Tehran, on which occasion the 2011 Axis for Peace Conference will also be held.

The march towards truth can no longer be stopped.


Video of Missile Hitting the Pentagon

September 21, 2010

There is nothing so powerful as truth, and often nothing so strange.
- Daniel Webster

God offers to every mind its choice between truth and repose. Take which you please; you can never have both.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson

A newly released video supposedly containing footage from 9/11 shows a cruise missile, painted to look like a small American Airlines plane, and other footage of a missile hitting the Pentagon.  The footage of the missile striking the building also apparently shows an illuminated laser spot on the wall of the Pentagon into which the missile strikes, exactly like we see in the World Trade Center videos.   Although the video may very well be fake, partly or completely, if it is genuine it would only further disprove the government version of what happened at the Pentagon. 

A small engine wheel was found in the debris.


Whatever it was that struck the Pentagon, it was certainly not a large American Airlines airliner, and only a missile like that seen in the video could have penetrated three complete rings of the Pentagon, piercing round holes through six thick walls of concrete and masonry.  The large hole seen in the video is the missile's exit hole in the sixth wall and this hole was not made by the fragile nose of an aluminum bodied aircraft, that's for sure.  

The exit hole of the missile which pierced 6 walls in three rings of the Pentagon.

Some people have suggested that I remove this video, because they say it is fake, which it may very well be.  It is very likely that some of the footage is faked while other parts are not.  I don't know.  I will let the viewer decide if he thinks it is real or fake.  Soon enough we will certainly know if it is fake.  The purpose of making part of it fake would be to discredit the theory that a missile stuck the Pentagon.  I would certainly like to see more of the footage of the explosion that occurred after the white streak hit the building. 

If the video images of the streaking white missile hitting the Pentagon are genuine, this would be exactly the kind of video footage that was confiscated by the F.B.I. from the video cameras that had a clear view of that area of the Pentagon on 9/11.  Pray tell, who has had access to the confiscated video evidence for the past 9 years?  Who has kept this evidence from the American people, while corrupt and venal politicians beat the drums of war?  Why did U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft and his assistant Michael Chertoff, the highest officials at the Department of Justice, keep these videos and other evidence from the public?  If this video is legitimate, what does it say about the people running the U.S. government?  How much longer can the 9/11 criminals keep up their failing cover-up?  The walls of the cover-up are crumbling all around them.





Making Sense of the Media Cover-Up of 9-11

August 25, 2010

The theory of the free press is not that the truth will be presented completely or perfectly in any one instance, but that the truth will emerge from free discussion.
- Walter Lippman, American editor and writer, 1889-1974

On 9-11, President George W. Bush said "America was targeted for attack because we're the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world."  Minutes after the demolitions of the Twin Towers, Ehud Barak, the former Israeli prime minister, told the world on BBC World television that Osama Bin Laden was behind the attacks and that the United States should invade Afghanistan.  This was, after all, the real plan behind the false-flag attacks. 

Anyone who has looked at the events of 9-11 knows there are basically two competing histories. First, there is the official version, presented by President George W. Bush in a speech given shortly after the attacks and bolstered by the appointed 9-11 commission, that Muslim terrorists were responsible for the death and destruction. This version has since been adopted and supported by the Obama administration and virtually every member of Congress. 

The second version is fundamentally opposed to the official version in that it claims that the terror attacks were a sophisticated "false flag" operation carried out by Israelis with the assistance of highly-placed Zionist agents inside the U.S. government. This version posits that the Israeli plan was for the attacks to be blamed on Al Qaida in order to usher in the Zionist-designed "War on Terror" with its pre-planned invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. 

While the official version is the only one discussed in the mainstream media, various strands of the unofficial version are found primarily on the Internet. As any serious student of 9-11 knows, the mainstream media ignores a whole host of legitimate questions, facts, and evidence about the attacks that would be reported and examined by the media if it were free to do so.

Americans are raised with the cherished belief that the United States has a free and unfettered press in which important matters are freely discussed. Yet, if the United States truly has a free press, how do we explain the conspicuous failure of the mainstream media, over a period of nine years, to discuss the crucial facts and discoveries about 9-11? If we believe that the press in America is free, how can we make sense of the media's blatant cover-up?

For nine years, in lockstep with the government, the mass media has followed a strategy of concealment of the facts and evidence that contradict the official version. The media cover-up is meant to protect and bolster the official version of the terror atrocity by preventing the general public from being aware of the facts. By censoring any serious discussion of the evidence, the mass media has protected the criminal scheme and those who carried out the terror atrocity of our time.


Paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell.
- Hugo Black, American jurist and politician, 1886-1971

To grasp what is meant by the term "media cover-up", let's start with a simple question: Are the reporters and writers in the mainstream media free to discuss the pertinent facts and evidence of 9-11, or is this discussion being controlled and censored by a hidden hand? By "mainstream media" I simply mean the large national networks of print, television, and radio news outlets. These are the well known commercial and "public" media networks that inform and entertain Americans on a daily basis. For many Americans these mass media outlets actually define their reality. For these people, a subject is not considered "real" until it has been discussed and approved by the talking heads on the news programs they consume.

Although 9-11 ranks as one of the most outrageous criminal atrocities of all time, there is a long list of unanswered questions that the mainstream media avoids. As an independent journalist, I have covered many 9-11 events and discoveries that have been completely ignored by the mainstream media. The media's refusal to cover significant 9-11 events has often been the subject of my articles, e.g. "Mass Media Avoids Questions about 9-11" (2002) and "How the Controlled Press Avoids 9-11 Truth" (2005).

Hundreds of relatives of 9-11 victims came to the Capitol in June 2002 to protest the government's failure to investigate...

and although senior members of Congress addressed the assembly of 9-11 relatives on the lawn of the Capitol the controlled media completely avoided the event.  Even C-Span failed to cover the historic event.  What kind of "free press" is that?  (Photos - Christopher Bollyn)


A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.
- John F. Kennedy, U.S. President, 1961-1963

In March 2009, Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University published photographic evidence of an extremely explosive compound of super-thermite, which he discovered in large amounts in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers. The chips of super-thermite were fragments of a bi-layered coating, made using nanotechnology and applied to the interior surfaces of the Twin Towers. 

The chips of the extremely energetic coating of super-thermite found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center are evidence that very advanced explosives were used to demolish the Twin Towers.  The large amount of this nano-composite of thermite in the dust indicates that tens of tons of this material had been applied to the interior surfaces of the World Trade Center.  This discovery marked the end of the government version as an acceptable explanation for the collapses.  Why has the mass media avoided this crucial discovery?  Who are they protecting?

While this discovery explains the pulverization of the 220 concrete floors and the steel pans that held them, it also exposes the falseness of the government claim that burning jet fuel caused the towers to collapse. Like the many unanswered questions about the demolition of the three towers of the World Trade Center, Jones' crucial discovery has been completely avoided by both the government and the media. How can such an important discovery be ignored by the government and media in a free and open society?

If the editors and journalists employed by the thousands of newspapers, magazines, television and radio stations across the United States were truly free to discuss the relevant facts and evidence of 9-11, how could it be that not a single national news outlet has covered Dr. Jones' published discovery of super-thermite after two years?


The press is the hired agent of a monied system, and set up for no other purpose than to tell lies where their interests are involved. One can trust nobody and nothing.
- Henry B. Adams (1838-1918), President of the American Historical Association

Ehud Olmert, the Israeli mayor of Jerusalem, was in New York City on the very eve of 9-11 and was probably in the city during the attacks, something I discovered several years ago. As the mayor of New York's sister city, Olmert (from the hard-line Likud, the party founded by Zionist terrorists) later made a high-profile sympathy visit to New York City about 10 days after the attacks, yet the Jewish-owned newspapers and tabloids of New York City completely ignored Olmert's visit to their city the day before the attacks, something they and Mayor Rudy Giuliani certainly must have known about. How can this be? Why would the visit by a high-level Israeli politician to New York on the eve of 9-11 be kept out of the press – especially after the fact?

Ehud Olmert resurfaced in New York City on September 21, 2001, when tens of thousands were thought to have been killed.  Why has the U.S. media failed to report that Olmert was in New York City on September 10 - the day before the attacks?  The media silence makes no sense unless his visit was connected to the false-flag terror attacks.  Was Olmert on the El Al flight that left New York City on the afternoon of 9-11? (Photo - LIFE)

If the press in the United States were truly free, it would mean that thousands of news editors from each and every media outlet have consistently made the same decision that important 9-11 discoveries, events, and facts were not to be discussed in their newspaper, magazine, television or radio network. Because this is not possible, it must be that a hidden hand dictates what is reported about 9-11 in the mainstream media.


The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.
- J. Edgar Hoover, First Director of the FBI, 1935–1972

Having concluded that the mass media in the United States is controlled, we should ask who controls it, and how. Considering the air-tight media cover-up of 9-11, what can we discern about the nature of the hidden hand controlling the media? Using Socratic dialectic we can ask questions and use logic to identify the nature of the power controlling the media.

Our first question would be: Is the control mechanism external or internal? Has an outside force, such as the government, imposed itself upon the media in order to stifle coverage of 9-11, or is the media controlled from within? While governments certainly do suppress and censor media coverage, it is highly unlikely that the U.S. government is behind the media censorship of 9-11. Any government edict of that sort would have been discovered and exposed during the past nine years. Therefore, we can conclude that the control mechanism must be internal and intrinsic to the ownership of the media. 

Having concluded that the controlling hand is intrinsic to the ownership of the media, we need to determine if the various owners of the major media networks are independent of each other or are they somehow united in a conspiracy to cover-up the truth of 9-11 and deceive the public?  Judging from the 9-11 cover-up, which has been complete and universal throughout the mass media for nine years, we can see that the owners are united in purpose and working in concert. That is to say that the owners of the commercial media networks and directors of the public broadcasting system are all working under the same hidden hand. There is no dissent. The controlling power is pervasive throughout the media sphere of the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, and Europe. Given today's consolidation of the global media, one individual such as Rupert Murdoch of News Corporation may own hundreds of newspapers, magazines, and television stations around the world. But Rupert Murdoch must be controlled by the same hidden hand as the owners of Time Warner (CNN), CBS Corporation, and the other media networks. 

Sumner Redstone (born Rothstein) is majority owner of CBS Corporation, Viacom, MTV Networks, BET, Paramount Pictures, and DreamWorks movie studios. Leslie Moonves, a former used car dealer, is president and CEO of CBS Corporation. Moonves also happens to be the great-nephew of David Ben-Gurion, the Zionist leader of the Haganah who became the first Prime Minister of Israel.  Whatever organization Redstone, Moonves, Murdoch, and the other media owners belong to and from whom they evidently take their marching orders, it must be a very secretive cabal.

The U.S. media mogul Sumner Redstone is a devoted supporter of Israel and Zionist causes.  Here he poses with Arnon Milchan (left), Mossad's veteran agent in Hollywood, at his gala event to mark the 60th anniversary of the Zionist state, "From Vision to Reality", held at Paramount Studios on September 18, 2008.  Benjamin Netanyahu, the current prime minister of Israel, worked with Milchan's company when it was engaged in illegal smuggling of nuclear devices from the United States for Israel's nuclear arsenal.  (Photo - LIFE)

What else can we tell about the secret organization that the owners of the media belong to? One of the most conspicuous and peculiar characteristics of the U.S. media is its unquestioning support of Zionism and the state of Israel. Although Israel is a tiny state, about the same size as Slovenia or Albania, it is always discussed in the U.S. mass media, but its overtly racist policies and blatant war crimes are never criticized. The mainstream media in the United States is actually more supportive of the hard-line Zionist policies of Israel's Likud extremists than the Israeli press, which indicates that the secret organization behind the media must be extremely Zionist and pro-Israel by ideology. 

As explained in my book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World, there is a great deal of evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the "false flag" terror attacks of 9-11 – and the criminal destruction of evidence and cover-up that followed.  Having concluded that the owners of the mass media networks are bound together in a secret Zionist organization, we can now understand how it is that they are in complete agreement in their refusal to cover or publish anything that would question the official version and shed light on the evidence of Zionist involvement in the terror atrocity that killed thousands of Americans on 9-11. This is evidently what the elders of their secret organization have ordered and what they must do.

Is there a secret international Zionist brotherhood of prominent Jewish men? Actually there are several, the largest being the International Order of B'nai B'rith (Sons of the Covenant), which was founded in New York City in 1843. The first lodge was founded by twelve German Jews and sponsored by a Baruch Rothschild, a member of the Rothschild family, who came to America on a mission to organize the creation of a Jewish brotherhood of Freemasons.


Zionist secret orders, like the B'ne Moshe whose very existence was a sworn secret, have secret control over other secret societies.  A Jewish secret order is hidden within the Freemasonic order like a Russian matryoshka doll.  The Mormon church is also controlled by similar secret societies, like the Masonic temples established by Joseph Smith,
the church's founder, in Illinois.

There is nothing so despicable as a secret society that is based upon religious prejudice and that will attempt to defeat a man because of his religious beliefs. Such a society is like a cockroach -- it thrives in the dark. So do those who combine for such an end.
- William Howard Taft, U.S. President, 1909-1913

While the B'nai B'rith is an exclusively Jewish brotherhood closed to all non-Jews, members of the B'nai B'rith are often the highest-level members of other orders of Freemasonry. This means that members of the Jewish secret society are free to join and hold the highest positions in other non-Jewish orders. This relationship of a secret society within a secret society explains how Jewish members of B'nai B'rith are able to control other orders of Freemasonry.

This is a pattern that is commonly seen in Zionist history. The Zionist movement has always been run by secret societies. The B'ne Moshe, for example, was the secret order behind the Hovevei Zion (Lovers of Zion) movement, with chapters in Russia and Poland in the late 1800s. The B'ne Moshe was founded in Odessa in 1889 and its statement of policy written by the Zionist leader Ahad Ha'am (a.k.a. Asher Zvi Ginzberg). The secret order was composed of an "elite body" of Zionists who "would serve their people with complete unselfishness and devotion and prepare it for national rebirth in the ancestral Homeland", according to the Encyclopedia of Zionism and Israel.  "Membership was not open to all but was limited to men of high moral caliber. New entrants were inducted in a solemn ceremony and sworn to observe the order's rules and to keep its existence secret."

The B'nai B'rith is a secret society very much like the B'ne Moshe. It is an international secret brotherhood of Zionists whose stated goal is to support the state of Israel. The B'nai B'rith is a Masonic-like organization that has more than 500,000 members in 58 nations. Despite the fact that it is an international organization that works on behalf of a foreign state, the B'nai B'rith enjoys the tax exemptions of a non-profit charitable organization.

The B'nai B'rith is also the parent organization behind the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which liaises, trains, and informs police departments, prosecutors, and judges across the United States. As an independent journalist writing about 9-11, I was first accused by the ADL in late 2001 of anti-Semitism because of my articles about the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. Although I wrote for the Washington-based American Free Press, which was extremely careful about what it published and had never published anything that could be construed as anti-Semitic, the owner of the paper did not sue the ADL for defamation. This is probably because the owner of the paper was himself a Zionist lawyer named Mark Lane.*

Later, I received the same kind of treatment from Murdoch's FOX News and CNN in interviews in which they pretended to be interested in the facts about 9-11, but were actually set-up to smear me as an anti-Semite. The CNN television interview was chopped and only presented in small bits so that the listener heard none of the context. An ADL spokesman was spliced in to give the impression that I was an anti-Semite. This show aired the night before my trial was scheduled to begin in January 2007.

After being brutally attacked on my own property by a team of heavily armed undercover police, I was prosecuted by a Zionist prosecutor in front of a Zionist judge with a Zionist clerk.  All of them were controlled by the B'nai B'rith and its Anti-Defamation League, which has defamed me since 2001 because of my writing about 9-11.

When my trial finally began in June 2007, I realized that the B'nai B'rith and the ADL had influence or control over the local police who had attacked me at my home, the Jewish prosecutor, the Jewish judge and his clerk, who instructed the jury. The prosecutor – in the middle of America - had even stated that he was prosecuting me because of my writings.  Although the police attack was highly irregular and despite the fact that I had ample evidence of a police conspiracy to attack and injure me, I was powerless to defend myself in a system in which a secret society controls all the levers of power - in the court and the media.  When all was said and done, although the police clearly lied on the stand and presented fabricated evidence, I was found guilty on both misdemeanor charges. Having gone through a brutal attack by undercover police and the long hellish process of a rigged trial, I then faced sentencing at the hands of the corrupt Zionist judge, a situation which compelled us to leave our happy home in order to preserve the safety and security of our family.

* Not all that glitters is gold. - I was told that Mark Lane acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1994 by L.T. Patterson, publisher of Criminal Politics.  Patterson discovered that Lane was the real legal owner of the assets of the Liberty Lobby during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson for $10 million, which would have ruined Patterson had he not prevailed.  I have every reason to believe that Patterson's information is correct.  There is no transparency at the Liberty Lobby about finances or ownership.  Like the missing piece of a puzzle, Lane's key role explains the bizarre behavior of the people at American Free Press and why they treated me as they did.  I believe that they were involved in helping set up the ADL's undercover police assault I suffered in August 2006 at my home outside Chicago.

Sources and Recommended Reading

Bollyn, Christopher, " Mass Media Avoids Questions about 9-11", June 12, 2002

Bollyn, "The Mass Media and the 9-11 Cover-Up", Solving 9-11 (Chapter VIII)

Bollyn, "How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11", May 5, 2010

Bollyn, "Israel's Secret Super Thermite Lab", August 26, 2009

Bollyn, "How the Controlled Press Avoids 9-11 Truth", August 25, 2005

Bollyn, "The Jewish Secret Society That Controls the U.S. Media", December 1, 2009

Bollyn, "Did Rupert Murdoch Have Prior Knowledge of 9-11?", October 3, 2003

Bollyn, "Top Secret: Ehud Olmert's 9-11 Visit to NYC", December 4, 2007

Encyclopedia of Zionism and Israel, Edited by Raphael Patai, Herzl Press/McGraw Hill, New York, 1971

How the ADL Indoctrinates Police in Chicago, "Museum Teaches Police Recruits About the Holocaust"

Icke, David, "The Zionist Elephant In The Room", David Icke Newsletter, June 14, 2009

Makow, Henry, "Illuminati Created the U.S. to Advance New World Order", March 29, 2010

9/11 Litigation Update - Justice Denied - One Case Left

August 11, 2010

It was murder.  We will never get over it. 
We are fighting for the truth...
I hope there are people out there who want the truth. 
- Mary Bavis, mother of 9/11 victim Mark Bavis

An article from the Boston Herald dated 6 March 2010 reported that there was only one 9/11 wrongful death lawsuit remaining at that time.  The remaining wrongful death lawsuit is that of Mark Bavis, a professional hockey scout.  I spoke with Mark's mother Mary on August 8 and she confirmed that their case is still open, which makes it the last possibility to obtain a public trial to determine who was responsible for the thousands of deaths on 9/11.  The 9/11 victims have been completely denied justice, thanks to a corrupt U.S. district judge who is a devoted Zionist agent.  He is the orthodox Jewish Zionist who has handled the entire process and protected the Israeli terrorists of 9/11 - Alvin K. Hellerstein.  Hellerstein is acting as the agent of a foreign nation and should be charged with treason.

Update Note:  On August 5, I spoke with both the father and mother of 9/11 victim Sara Elizabeth Low and was left with the understanding that the Low family case was not settled and that there were two cases remaining.  This is, however, evidently not the case.  As I have seen in other cases, the 9/11 relatives are under very strict instructions not to talk about their cases - even after they have settled - and they don't.  I can't imagine how the families of the 9/11 victims are threatened to stay silent.  It must be that they are in fear of being charged with a crime, not unlike the way that U.S. military personnel are silenced about what they do in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, a devoted Zionist judge with family connections to the Israeli defendant in the 9/11 litigation, has obstructed justice by blocking a trial from occurring.  The 9/11 tort litigation process under Hellerstein has been an appalling travesty of justice.
There are thousands of American families who lost loved ones on 9/11.  All of those families had the right to use the courts to sue the airlines and the "airport security" companies whose failure contributed directly to the deaths of their loved ones, at least according to the official story.  Chief among these defendants in the 9/11 tort litigation is Huntleigh USA (owned by International Consultants on Targeted Security, ICTS N.V.), the Israeli-owned "security" and passenger-screening company.  Ninety-eight percent of these families accepted a payment from the U.S. taxpayer-funded victim compensation fund, which was distributed by the preferred insurance payout czar, Kenneth Feinberg.  In accepting the Feinberg brokered payout of taxpayer money these families forfeited their right to litigate further.  By blocking a trial from happening Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has protected a key defendant, the Israeli-owned passenger-screening company Huntleigh USA, and others who have not had to answer any questions or defend themselves in court.  The failure to hold a trial in the 9/11 tort litigation has effectively prevented any legal discovery and enabled the 9/11 cover-up to continue.
There were 96 families of 9/11 victims who did not take the Feinberg-brokered payment and chose to use the courts in their effort to obtain justice and accountability.  Nine years after 9/11, there has still not been a trial for the families involved in the tort litigation and there is only one wrongful death lawsuit left to be settled.

Mike Low of Batesville, Arkansas, is the father of Sara Elizabeth Low, a flight attendant on American Airline Flight 11, the first plane to strike the World Trade Center.  The Low family was one of the last remaining cases in the tort litigation, a process that has been handled in the federal courtroom of Alvin K. Hellerstein in Manhattan. 

Sara Elizabeth Low of Batesville, Arkansas
A Boston Herald article, dated 6 March 2010, reported:  "A Manhattan judge is being vilified by the grieving family of a Boston flight attendant murdered in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks because they say he has blocked a public trial, forcing them to give up the fight."

The family of Sara Low, 28, who died "a hero" battling the terrorists aboard American Airlines Flight 11, announced they have reached an out-of-court settlement.

"Our judicial system very much favors Goliath over David," said Alyson Low, Sara's sister, who lives in Arkansas. "This is not a victorious day for us. Our goal from the start was to go to trial, so the public could learn with no political filters about the depth and breadth of the negligence that led to Sara's death," Alyson Low said in an exclusive interview with the Herald.

She accused Manhattan federal Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of putting up road blocks to delay any hope of a trial...

This leaves one family out of the 96 who declined to buy into a congressional no-fault fund holding out.

The family of Mark Bavis, 31, of West Newton still wants an open trial, said attorney
Donald A. Migliori.

Mark Bavis
Bavis was a pro hockey scout for the L.A. Kings who died on United Airlines Flight 175, which left Logan and slammed into the World Trade Center.

"All I see is 95 out of 96 cases settled and the airlines successful in keeping information from the public," said Brian Sullivan, a retired Boston FAA official.

Donald Alan Migliori of Motley Rice has represented many of the 9/11 relatives.  He has utterly failed to get the public trial for the 9/11 families and only one case remains.  Who is he really working for if he is unable to get a trial for even one of the 96 families in the 9/11 tort litigation?
The other 95 cases have all settled out of court.  The 9/11 tort litigation process has been a legal war of attrition between U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein and the 9/11 relatives, and the Zionist judge has prevailed by eliminating the wrongful death lawsuits one-by-one.  Hellerstein's son is an Israeli lawyer who works for a law firm that works for the parent company of ICTS.  This presents a clear-cut and criminal conflict of interest for the judge but the lawyers who represent the 9/11 relatives don't seem willing or able to do anything about it.  The conflict of interest affects not only the relatives of the 9/11 victims.  It taints the entire judicial process surrounding 9/11 and all related terrorism issues, which Hellerstein also oversees.

I spoke with Mike Low on August 5.  As I expected, he said he was not permitted to discuss the case, although he confirmed that the Low family had not obtained the trial they had been promised in April 2010.  Like the other 9/11 relatives, Mike Low is gagged.  He is not allowed to talk about his case.  Everything is very hush-hush and done behind closed doors.  Even after they settle the families are not allowed to discuss their settlements.  Who does all this secrecy benefit?  It is certainly no benefit for the relatives or the public.  The only ones who benefit from this secrecy are those who carried out the false flag terrorism on 9/11 and those who are behind the cover-up of the truth.

Mike Low of Batesville, Arkansas is also a pilot.
In July 2009, when he finally got a trial date in April 2010, Low told CBS News:  "I want people to know 9/11 could have been prevented. These Saudi thugs could have been stopped…This is an excruciating thing as a parent to continue this, but I don't have a choice," Low said. "I could just not quit until I know I've gone as far as I can go, because I would have her image hanging over me the rest of my life saying, 'You quit, you quit.'"


Mary Bavis, the mother of Mark Bavis, told me on August 10 that she knows of families that settled out of court who regret that decision.  The Bavis family is not wealthy, she said.  Mark's father, Richard, was a Boston policeman who passed away a decade before his son was murdered on 9/11.  "He was a man with principles," Mary said, "and his children are just like him."
The Bavis family is a devout Catholic family and Mary said that her "faith and prayers" have helped her in her struggle for the truth.  "We'll make it", she said, and expressed her wish that the American public would support the 9/11 relatives who are fighting for a public trial. "We are fighting for the truth," she said, "I hope there are people out there who want the truth." 

If the Israeli agent Hellerstein is able to obstruct justice by blocking a trial he will succeed in closing the book on the sordid Zionist saga of 9/11 without a single case going to trial.  If that were to happen, it would be a huge travesty of justice and we would all lose -- and the real terrorists of 9/11 would win.  For the victims of 9/11, for their families, and ours, we must not let that happen.

Alvin K. Hellerstein is the Clinton-appointed U.S. district judge who handles all 9/11 related litigation.  Hellerstein is a devoted Zionist agent who is serving the state of Israel by covering up the truth of 9/11.  His Israeli son works for the Rothschild-owned parent company of ICTS, the key defendant in the 9/11 litigation.  This is clearly a criminal conflict of interest.  Hellerstein should be arrested and charged as a foreign agent.
Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Judge Hellerstein's Unethical Connection to Key Defendant in 9-11 Lawsuit", May 10, 2010

Bollyn, Christopher, "Giuliani & D'Amato - Tied to Israeli Military Intelligence", October 5, 2007

"Little-Noticed 9/11 Lawsuits Will Go to Trial", by Anemona Hartocollis, New York Times, September 4, 2007

"9/11 victim's family settles, if reluctantly", Boston Herald - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services, March 6, 2010

"9/11 Wrongful-Death Suit Receives April Trial Date", by Benjamin Weiser, New York Times, July 28, 2009

9/11 & Nine Years of Deception and War

Updated:  August 9, 2010

A U.S. soldier in Afghanistan.  July has been the deadliest month of the nine-year war for U.S. troops in Afghanistan with 66 fatalities reported.  Apart from the 8,000 Americans reported killed and wounded in Afghanistan, tens of thousands more will bear the heavy spiritual and psychological burden of having participated in a fraudulent and illegal war in which they killed innocent people.  Why, and for whom are we really fighting this criminal war in Central Asia?


Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
Galatians 6:7

Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don't have brains enough to be honest.
Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)

We are never deceived; we deceive ourselves.
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe (1749-1832)

Nine years ago this week Larry Silverstein and his partner, the former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, closed the deal on the 99-year lease of the World Trade Center.  Silverstein and Lowy, devoted agents of the state of Israel and its Zionist fund-raising organizations in New York, immediately had their leased WTC property and future rental earnings insured against a terror attack exactly like that which occurred only seven weeks later.   Having obtained the lease with borrowed funds, Silverstein promptly raised rents forty percent.

Unlike the Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein actually owned WTC 7, the 47-story building that fell straight down into its footprint at about 5:25 p.m. on 9-11, in what was clearly a controlled demolition.  All three towers demolished on 9-11 were under Silverstein's control and although he openly admitted on camera that he had decided to "pull" WTC 7, his revealing comments have never been investigated by the authorities of New York City or the federal government.    Whoever placed the super-thermite and other explosive charges in the Twin Towers probably did so during the seven weeks before 9-11, when Silverstein completely controlled access to the towers.  Apart from all the other questions, Silverstein has never been held to account for the fact that the escape doors to the roof of both towers had been locked.  Why were rooftop evacuations not attempted?

Larry Silverstein had control of all three towers that were demolished on 9-11.  The explosive demolition of his three buildings made him a billionaire.  Under the Rothschild Zionist crimocracy that controls New York City and the United States, Silverstein has been richly rewarded for his role in terrorism and mass murder - rather than investigated and punished.

In the following video Silverstein comments on his decision to "pull" WTC 7: 


In the following video truth activists from confront and publicly shame 9-11 billionaire Larry Silverstein.  This is exactly the kind of treatment the public should give to Michael Chertoff, George Bush, Dick Cheney, Hillary Clinton, Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert, Shimon Peres, Lewis Eisenberg, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, Rupert Murdoch, and every other Rothschild-funded criminal involved in the 9-11 terror atrocity and cover-up.

While Larry Silverstein is certainly one of the key players in the false-flag terrorism of 9-11, it is unlikely that he is one of the high-level architects of the master plan behind the terror atrocity.  He is more likely to be a Mossad operative known as a sayan, a devoted Zionist Jew and "useful idiot" who carried out an essential function in a large and complex operation.  The master plan behind the "false-flag" terrorism of 9-11 was to deceive the U.S. government and western nations into occupying Afghanistan and waging an open-ended "War on Terror" against those Middle Eastern nations that resist the hegemony of the Rothschild-funded Zionist state of Israel.  Ehud Barak, the current defense minister of Israel, was the first person to call for a U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, which he did on the Rothschild-controlled BBC World television network only minutes after the towers were demolished.

Ehud Barak with U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates at the Pentagon on July 27, 2010.  Although Barak is an architect of the false-flag terror of 9-11, he is being treated to an Honor Guard at the Pentagon by U.S. soldiers who should be arresting him.  Barak the war criminal visits the Pentagon every few weeks and is pushing for a military attack on Iran.  Without a single piece of evidence, Barak was the first person to call for a U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, which he did on 9-11 from the London studio of the BBC.  Barak is a well-known architect of terrorism and war crimes, for example the murderous assault on the Gaza Strip during Christmas 2008 during which some 1,400 Palestinian civilians were killed.

"There is a much larger group behind these [9/11 attacks] which is the international banking cartel which controls trillions of dollars and which has an interest in controlling countries in the Middle East which are not under their control."
- Professor Steven E. Jones on KUER (Salt Lake City's NPR affiliate), September 5, 2006

I have been reading many articles on the 9-11 atrocity and other major world events. I am a 46-year-old Ashkenazi Jew from London, England.  I believe the Rothschilds and the banking conspiracy are behind EVERYTHING. When I bring the subject up with my peers and family, I am told it is anti-Semitic nonsense, probably paid for by the Saudi Arabians.
- Letter to, April 2010

The cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is more than 1 trillion U.S. dollars.  (See - war in Afghanistan has already cost U.S. taxpayers more than 286 thousand million (billion) dollars, while the war in Iraq has burned up some 736 thousand million (billion) dollars.  One out of five children in the USA live in poverty and tens of millions are unable to afford health care.  The debt of the United States has more than doubled since 2001 and is now so large that all the money taken in by the collection of income tax is not enough to pay the interest on that debt.  All of the federal debt and the immense sums that have been wasted on the disastrous wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are "borrowed" funds, i.e.  money created by commercial banks like those owned by the house of Rothschild, which has a two-hundred year history of instigating war for profit. 


Zionism, the ideology of Jewish nationalism and racial segregation, was not something that simply cropped up among the Jews of Eastern Europe and the Russian Empire. The ideology of political and religious Zionism was cultivated by the Rothschilds over a period of decades in the Jewish communities of Eastern Europe. The Rothschilds realized that through Zionism they could obtain a Jewish state which could serve their purposes. To spread the Zionist ideology among the Jews of Eastern Europe they employed the secret Masonic organization of Jewish Zionists, the International Order of B'nai B'rith, which they had founded with fellow German Jews in New York in 1843.

Benjamin Peixotto, grand master of the International Order of B’nai B’rith in 1863, spent six years in Rumania recruiting Jews to Zionism and Jewish Masonry. In Rumania, Peixotto founded the Society of Zion, a branch organization of the B'nai B'rith. Through these Jewish Masonic organizations, Peixotto was instrumental in bringing many Romanian Jews, like the family of Michael Chertoff, to Cleveland.

The Rothschilds fostered the B'nai B'rith and Zionism because they realized that these could be useful tools to increase their wealth and power. A Zionist state in Palestine, beside the Suez Canal, would serve their global interests in the oil-rich and strategic Middle East. Edmond James de Rothschild fostered the Zionist movement from the beginning by sponsoring organizations like the Hovevei Zion (Lovers of Zion) in Poland and other parts of the Russian Empire in the 1880s.

Avigdor Gruen, the father of David (Gruen) Ben-Gurion, was a leader in the Rothschild-funded Hovevei Zion movement in Warsaw. Leon Pinsker was another founder of Hovevei Zion and became chairman of the movement with the backing of Baron Edmond James de Rothschild. Avigdor's son, David, grew up to be an ardent Zionist and the "father of the state of Israel." As a college student in Warsaw in 1904, David Gruen joined the Marxist Poale Zion movement and was arrested twice during the Russian Revolution of 1905 before migrating to Palestine the following year.

The first Zionist settlement, Rishon Le Zion was founded in 1882 in Palestine by ten Hovevei Zion pioneers from Kharkov, Ukraine. When the first settlers of Rishon Le Zion encountered difficulties, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild took over the administration of the settlement. Rothschild established a winery on the settlement in 1886, where David Ben-Gurion later served as the head of the workers' union long before he became the head of the Haganah (Zionist militia) and Israel's first prime minister.

In 1915, Ben-Gurion was expelled from Turkish-ruled Palestine because of his Zionist activities. He was sent to New York City in 1915, where he worked to recruit Jews to serve in the Jewish Legion of the British army.

Samuel Mohilever, another founder of the Hovevei Zion movement in Warsaw, was a rabbi and pioneer of religious Zionism. Mohilever convinced Rothschild to financially support the settlement of Ekron. Mohilever, the rabbi of Białystok, worked to promote Zionism by convincing Białystok's Jews to move to Petah Tikva, another Rothschild-sponsored settlement. Mohilever is credited with having merged traditional Jewish orthodoxy with practical Zionism.

Edmond de Rothschild spent over $50 million dollars (more than $1 billion in 2010) in sponsoring and supporting 30 Zionist settlements in Palestine. By 1925, the Rothschild name was synonymous with the Zionist settlement activity. When he died in Paris in 1934, Rothschild left a legacy of having reclaimed nearly 500,000 dunams, or 124,000 acres of land in Palestine (1 dunam=1,000 square meters).

Edmond de Rothschild is considered the "Father of Modern Israel"

and is duly commemorated on Israel's 500 shekel note.

The Rothschild group is deeply engaged in gold, diamond, and gas and oil mining operations worldwide.  Afghanistan is an extremely wealthy nation in terms of mineral resources and it also occupies a crucial location between the Mossad-controlled gas fields of Turkmenistan and the lucrative markets for that gas in India and China.  The real object of the war in Afghanistan is to "pacify" the Afghan resistance so that the long-planned TAPI pipeline (from Turkmenistan to India) can be built across the southern part of the nation (via Kandahar) in order to sell the Israeli-owned gas to India and China.  If such a pipeline can be completed it would bring incredible wealth to the Israelis and their Rothschild backers.

The planned route of the TAPI gas pipeline

The Rothchild family of London and Paris was the main financier and driving force behind the creation of the state of Israel, although most of the family continues to live in its mansions in Europe.  An Israeli member of the family, Major General Danny Rothschild, runs the policy and strategy unit at the Mossad think tank/school known as the Inter-Disciplinary Center (IDC) in Herzliya near Tel Aviv. 

Major General (Aluf) Daniel "Danny" Rothschild heads Israel's Institute for Policy and Strategy.  He was born in 1946 on the Rothschild-funded settlement of Rishon Le Zion...

where David Ben-Gurion worked...

before he became the head of the Zionist terrorist militia (Haganah) and first prime minister of the Rothschild-funded state of Israel.  Seen here with Edmund Rothschild, Ben Gurion was behind the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946, an act of Zionist terrorism very similar to 9-11.

As the recent disclosure of some 91,000 reports from the war in Afghanistan reveals, the war is far more brutal and criminal than most Americans would have ever thought.   These disturbing reports were published on WikiLeaks on the same day that Silverstein obtained the WTC lease - nine years after.

The war in Afghanistan is a criminal war and occupation because it is based on the lies that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida, supposedly based in Afghanistan, carried out the terrorism of 9-11.  This criminal deceit continues, like a tug-of-war, between those who are part of the deception and those who are fighting for the truth of what really happened on 9-11.

Neither Osama Bin Laden nor Al Qaida had anything to do with the demolition of the World Trade Center, which was pulverized using an extremely powerful form of super-thermite made with nanotechnology.

A large amount of the explosive super-thermite coating was found, in tiny fragments, in the dust of the Twin Towers.  This crucial discovery by Dr. Steven E. Jones exposes the official explanation to be nothing but a treasonous pack of lies.  The people behind the 9-11 cover-up have committed treason and lied to the American public and the world for nine years.  They are war criminals of the worst kind.

President Barack Obama is waging the war in Afghanistan because, he says, the terrorism of 9-11 came from there.  The Obama administration, however, refuses to discuss the crucial discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center, which reveals that an advanced explosive coating made using nanotechnology was used to pulverize the concrete floors of the Twin Towers.  The same officials who support the criminal deception about what happened on 9-11 have used these lies to pull the United States and its allies into the criminal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. 

The former Danish prime minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, now Secretary General of NATO, for example, wrote an editorial entitled "Moving On in Afghanistan", which was published internationally by the New York Times on July 19, 2010.  Rasmussen stressed the false connection between the war in Afghanistan and 9-11:

After the tragedy of 9/11, indifference was no longer an option. Engagement was our only choice. Leaving Afghanistan to its own devices would have spelled more instability there, and more terrorist attacks worldwide...Our objective is clear: to ensure that Afghanistan does not again become a safe haven for terrorism.

In the tug-of-war over the truth of 9-11, Rasmussen, Obama, and Clinton are really just "the people in between", pulling as they are told to do by those who pay them.  They are certainly not the masters of the nine-year-old deception about 9-11, which raises the question, "Who is really behind the deception?"

In my book, Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World, I explain the details of the Israeli and Zionist role in the false-flag terror atrocity, which was originally planned during the 1970s when Menachem Begin, the arch-terrorist of the Irgun, became prime minister of Israel.  While Israeli terrorists like Ehud Barak, Ariel Sharon, and Ehud Olmert were evidently involved in the terror attacks there must be an even higher master behind them, one which has complete control over the U.S. and British governments and mass media.  The ultimate mastermind of 9-11 must also have control over Israeli politicians and their military intelligence, as well as the sprawling Zionist Masonic network headed by the B'nai B'rith.  Audacious as the Israeli Mossad is, it would not attack New York City and kill thousands of Americans if it did not have complete backing from the "international banking cartel" that controls the U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve System, and the U.S. White House and Congress.  There is only one entity that has such power and control - the House of Rothschild.  Two steps removed perhaps, but in the position to control every one of the culprits of the 9-11 atrocity and the nine-year cover-up.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Israel's Danny Rothschild and the Plundering of Iceland", July 15, 2010

Bollyn, "Judge Hellerstein's Unethical Connection to Key Defendant in 9-11 Lawsuit", May 10, 2010

Bollyn, "Obama is Obliged to Arrest Ehud Barak - 9-11 Mastermind and War Criminal", April 25, 2010

Bollyn, "Afghanistan - Obama's War for Israel", July 6, 2010

Bollyn, "The Spoils of War: The Minerals of Afghanistan", January 7, 2002

Bollyn, "Obama's Deception - 9-11 and Afghanistan", June 5, 2009

"Deal is Signed to Take Over Trade Center", by Charles V. Bagli, New York Times, April 27, 2001

"Governor Pataki, Acting Governor Difrancesco Laud Historic Port Authority Agreement To Privatize World Trade Center", Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Press Release, July 24, 2001

Robert Oswain R.I.P. - NYPD Victim of Toxic WTC Smoke

May 18, 2010 

Robert Oswain, a police officer with the New York Police Department (NYPD), died from cancer on May 15, 2010.  Oswain, a Bronx cop who served in recovery efforts at the destroyed World Trade Center, died of cancer late Saturday. He was 42 years old.

Robert Oswain
(Photo: William Baker, The Forgotten Victims)

Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly commended Oswain, who had recently married, for his "valiant struggle" against the disease. Oswain's family and NYPD brothers believe Ground Zero's toxic dust caused the cancer that claimed his life, the Daily News reported.

Patrolmen's Benevolent Association (NYC PBA) President Patrick Lynch called Oswain "one of the forgotten heroes of 9/11" - and warned that the true cost in lives from the attacks won't be known for decades.  The NYC PBA has a webpage devoted to Oswain in which he described what he did at the World Trade Center in the aftermath of 9-11:

PBA: What did you do at the WTC?

Robert Oswain: The day of the attack I was off. But two or three days later we went down for guard duty at West and Vesey Streets, not quite the pile but right where they were loading up the trucks with all the debris. I knew something was wrong because whenever they’d load up the trucks, this Army guy would come out in one of these suits you see in those movies about nuclear radiation. The hood over his head, the whole spaceman thing. And he’d power wash every one of the trucks before they could go uptown. The trouble with that was that it would send debris into the air. That was an area where there was always a breeze anyway, so dust was always being blown all over. We did 12- hour tours, and you couldn’t even open a container of coffee without exposing it to the garbage flying around. The federal government had to know what the threat was because they had EPA boxes on the parking meters to check air quality.

PBA: How long did you spend there?

Oswain: Overall it came to about 200 hours spread over three months. The worst part, at least at first, was when you’d go home and try to get the smell off your body. It sounds ridiculous, I know, but I had to brush my teeth for about 20 minutes and then, after that, make sure I reached every hair in my nose with soap. You missed one hair, you went to bed with the stink.


Robert Oswain did not actually die from the dust.  What Oswain was most likely afflicted by and eventually died from was exposure to the nano-size particles that were found in extremely large amounts in the toxic smoke which rose from the rubble of the World Trade Center for more than three months after 9-11.  The thin bluish smoke (which rose from the rubble pile until after Christmas 2001) was primarily composed of nano-size particles of heavy metals and other elements. These extremely small particles are only produced by fires hotter than the boiling point of the metal or element.

The bluish smoke that rose from the rubble was created by hotspots of boiling iron beneath the rubble.  These fires raged for more than three months despite being continuously doused with water. Large format PDF image is here.  (This photo and following five are from Aftermath by Joel Meyerowitz)

The special investigators from the fire department of New York had no idea that large amounts of super-thermite were responsible for the fires that could not be extinguished.  This was one of the first clues that something other than jet fuel (kerosene) was responsible for the destruction of the World Trade Center. Large format PDF is here.

The smoke that rose from the pile contained large amounts of extremely toxic nano-particles which cannot be stopped by even the most advanced respirators.  To inhale this smoke means to absorb toxic particles that can travel freely throughout the body before becoming lodged in the nucleus of the human cell - where they wreak havoc, causing cancer and other diseases.  Large format PDF is here.

Most of the workers on the pile of rubble lacked adequate protection from the nano-particles contained in the smoke.  Like U.S. soldiers exposed to nano-particles from depleted uranium munitions, many of these workers suffer from a host of ailments caused by "the particle effect."  Large format PDF is here.

The spraying of water did nothing to extinguish the aluminothermic (thermite) fires that raged beneath the rubble.  Because thermite is composed of aluminum and ferrous oxide it will burn despite the presence of water or the absence of air.  Large format PDF is here.

The men who worked on the removal of the rubble were exposed to extremely large amounts of nano-particles from the toxic smoke they worked in.  The U.S. government and New York City completely failed to protect those who worked on the pile or warn the residents of the dangers.   Large format PDF image is here.

It was in the spring of 2006 that I concluded that thermite was responsible for the nano-particles found in the smoke that had risen from the rubble until January 2002.  Having met with Dr. Steven E. Jones in Provo, Utah, I had continued on with the California Zephyr to my Alma Mater in Davis, California to meet with Dr. Thomas A. Cahill, an expert on airborne aerosols and director of the DELTA Group at the University of California. 

The California Zephyr crosses Donner Pass in the Sierra Nevada, California

The train station of Davis, California, where Christopher Bollyn began his college career and where he concluded (in early 2006) that thermite had created the nano-particles found in the smoke from the demolished World Trade Center.

Cahill and the DELTA Group had sent a Davis DRUM to New York City to independently collect and analyze the particles from the smoke of the fires that raged beneath the rubble of the destroyed World Trade Center.  Having found extremely large amounts of nano-particles in the smoke, I asked Dr. Cahill what could have created these particles.  Dr. Cahill said: "Ultra-fine particles require extremely high temperatures, namely the boiling point of the metal."

The hotspots that burned beneath the rubble and which produced the nano-particles found in the DELTA Group's drum were evidently hotter than the boiling point of iron:  2861 degrees Celsius or 5182 degrees Fahrenheit.  Given the evidence of molten iron found at the bottom of the pile and in the dust of the demolished towers, it was clear that ongoing thermitic reactions had probably created the nano-particles found in the smoke.

The discovery of evidence of thermite in the destruction of the World Trade Center was probably what led to the concerted attacks on me and Dr. Steven E. Jones.  I was attacked by a squad of undercover police at my home in mid-August 2006, shortly after returning from an extended period away.  Dr. Jones was attacked for completely innocent comments he made during an interview on the Salt Lake City affiliate of National Public Radio in early September 2006.  Both of us lost our jobs at the same time, probably as a result of our investigation of the role of thermite in the destruction of the World Trade Center.  Dr. Jones was allowed to continue his research of the dust at Brigham Young University and published a peer-reviewed paper in early 2009 in which actual evidence of the super-thermite used to pulverize the Twin Towers was presented to the public.  This historic paper marked the end of the official version as an acceptable explanation for what happened on 9-11.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Aftermath (World Trade Center Archive), photographs by Joel Meyerowitz, Phaidon Press 2006, London and New York

"WTC veteran cop Robert Oswain, 42, dies from cancer", by Rocco Parascandola and John Lauinger, New York Daily News, 17 May 2010 

The Forgotten Victims, Robert Oswain, New York City Patrolmen's Benevolent Association

Bollyn, Christopher, "Why Did Iron Boil beneath the Rubble?" May 6, 2006

Bollyn, C., "Who is behind the Attack on Professor Jones?" September 17, 2006

Bollyn, C., "Why are Honest 9-11 Researchers Targeted?" May 15, 2007

Bollyn, C., "Dr. Steven Jones Appeals for Fairness", May 23, 2007

Bollyn, C., "The Toxic Smoke from the Rubble", September 13, 2007

Bollyn, C., "Bush Was Behind Silencing of Dr. Steven E. Jones on Thermite", January 29, 2008

Bollyn, C., "How Depleted Uranium Particles Damage Human Health", January 7, 2005

Jones, Dr. Steven E., "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse", September 2006

Judge Hellerstein's Unethical Connection to Key Defendant in 9-11 Lawsuit

Updated May 10, 2010

9-11 Judge is Connected to Rothschild-Funded Mossad Culprit ICTS

It is very crass and it probably will come back to be critical of me, but there is an expression that is sometimes very useful, 'Money is the universal lubricant.' It makes it easier to go on with one's life. 
- Alvin K. Hellerstein

This bastard judicial system is so corrupt.
- 9/11 widow Ellen Mariani

Alvin K. Hellerstein is the judge who handles all 9-11 litigation.  His son is an Israeli lawyer who emigrated to Israel in 2001 and whose law firm works for and with the Rothschild-funded Mossad company responsible for the 9-11 terror attacks.  This presents a clear case of criminal conflict of interest and explains why Hellerstein has protected the Israeli culprits of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11 by preventing a trial and blocking any legal discovery of what really happened. (NYT photo)

He can't understand our loss. He sees the solution in a very cold and pragmatic way - in dollars and cents. He thinks everybody should take the money and go away.
- Mike Low, father of Sara, a flight attendant on American Airlines Flight 11

U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, the Orthodox Jew who oversees all 9-11 related cases, is seldom discussed in the news.  While his name does appear occasionally in the press, for example when he sentenced a "terrorism financier" to prison in April, the secretive judge who handles all 9-11 tort litigation is virtually unknown to most Americans.  This is intentional, of course, because any discussion of the Bronx-born judge would reveal his Zionist roots and close relationship to the state of Israel, where his son Joseph Z. Hellerstein lives on a Jewish settlement on the West Bank and practices law with one of Israel's most important law firms, Amit, Pollak & Matalon.   

Joseph Z. Hellerstein

Judge Hellerstein is the subject of a recent article in the New York Times.  The May 2 article by Mireya Navarro, "Empathetic Judge in 9/11 Suits Seen by Some as Interfering", is an overly positive ("puff") piece written for a sympathetic newspaper (i.e. one which is involved in the 9-11 cover-up) yet Hellerstein "declined repeated requests for an interview" with the Times.  Why would "the compassionate jurist" who has "shepherded" the 9-11 litigation process for years, and who is said to be "driven by a sense of social responsibility", refuse to be interviewed by the New York Times?  Why is such an important judge avoiding the national media at such a critical point in the 9-11 saga - and U.S. history?

The "puff piece" in the New York Times went so far as to end with a quote saying that Judge Hellerstein "is now like Elvis in the 9/11 community."  The article is clearly designed to cast Hellerstein in a glowing light before an increasingly skeptical public (before he closes the book on the 9-11 tort litigation - without a single case going to trial).  If Hellerstein were truly motivated by "a high standard of morality and decency" as his former co-partner at Stroock, Stroock & Lavan said, why is he so unwilling to discuss the 9-11 tort litigation?  There is, of course, only one reason for him to avoid the media - he has something to hide and wishes to avoid the spotlight.  Alvin Hellerstein is certainly not a hero.  He has completely obstructed justice for the 9-11 relatives - for eight years - by blocking any discovery and preventing the families from getting the one thing they all wanted - an open trial to find the truth of who was responsible for the terror attacks that caused the loss of their loved ones.  Hellerstein has played a key role in the 9-11 cover-up by blocking legal discovery and preventing a trial from occurring.

Having worked for years on the hypothesis that Israeli intelligence was involved in the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11, I have pointed out in my online book, Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World (and numerous articles) that the key players in the 9-11 saga are all closely connected to Israeli intelligence (i.e. Mossad).  Michael Chertoff, for example, supervised the non-investigation by the F.B.I. in which more than 99 percent of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center was hastily shipped to China and other Asian nations to be destroyed.  Chertoff, an Orthodox Jew who is affiliated with the same Zionist organizations in New York as Hellerstein, is an Israeli national whose mother was one of the first agents of the Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency.  Hellerstein, who has presided over the 9-11 litigation process, has a similar connection to the Mossad through his son, Joseph.

This is of crucial importance because one of the key defendants in the 9-11 wrongful death tort litigation process is the Mossad-controlled airport security firm named International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) N.V., which is the owner of Huntleigh U.S.A., the passenger screening company that checked the passengers that boarded the aircraft at the key airports on 9-11.  The Israeli-owned ICTS is one of the aviation security defendants responsible for the 9-11 terror attacks.  Any 9-11 trial would require ICTS and Huntleigh to provide evidence and explain who ran their security checkpoints on 9-11 and how the 19 terrorists got on the planes in spite of the fact that their names were not found on the passenger lists.  Judge Hellerstein has prevented a trial and effectively blocked any discovery that would reveal what really happened on 9-11.

Hellerstein has a clear conflict of interest in the 9-11 tort litigation because his son is a lawyer with Amit, Pollak & Matalon, the law firm that works for and is closely connected with Cukierman & Company, the parent company of ICTS.  Cukierman & Co. is headed by Roger Cukierman and his son Edouard.  Previously, Roger was CEO of the Edmond de Rothschild Group and chairman of the Israel General Bank.  He has also served as the chairman of several venture capital funds established by the Rothschild Group.  One of these funds, the Catalyst Fund, is run by Boaz Harel, a managing partner of private equity at Cukierman & Co. - and the head of ICTS at the time of 9-11.  The Rothschild/Cukierman Catalyst Fund is also invested in a company called Cyalume, which is run by several of the SCP Partners of Ehud Barak.  The Israeli Mossad corporate network may seem large but it always involves the same small group of people at the top.  Many of the names are easily recognized by a researcher who is familiar with the Zionist criminal network.  One of the head people of the Catalyst Fund and Cyalume, for example, is Yair Shamir, the son of the well-known terrorist-cum-prime minister Yitzhak Shamir.

Boaz Harel of ICTS is a partner at Cukierman & Co.

Judge Hellerstein's son, Joseph, works for a firm that represents and works with the company that owns one of the key defendants in the 9-11 tort litigation.  This presents an obvious (and probably criminal) conflict of interest that cannot be ignored or allowed.  The Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges has a checklist for financial and other conflicts of interest that is very helpful in understanding Hellerstein's conflict(s) of interest in the 9-11 tort litigation.  Through Judge Hellerstein's connection(s) to Stroock, Stroock & Lavan (who represented Silverstein when he acquired the World Trade Center) and through his son, whose Israeli law firm (Amit, Pollak, Matalon & Co.) works closely with (and represents) Cukierman & Co., the parent firm and employer of Boaz Harel and ICTS, key defendants in the 9-11 tort litigation.

Both Alvin Hellerstein and his son Joseph worked for the well known Jewish law firm of Stroock, Stroock & Lavan before moving to the positions they now hold.  President Bill Clinton appointed Alvin Hellerstein to the U.S. District Court in New York in 1998 and Joseph moved to Israel in 2001.  They both know that the conflict of interest exists, which is why they don't want to be interviewed by the media.  Stroock, Stroock & Lavan played a key role in the setting up of 9-11.  They represented Silverstein Properties when Larry Silverstein acquired the lease for the World Trade Center in July 2001.  They also represented Goldman Sachs, A.I.G., and Cerberus Capital Management, three of the key fraudulent companies involved in the trillion dollar bail-out of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

Stroock has a long history of representing the Rothschild's and other high-level Zionists:

Firm historian Jethro Lieberman wrote: 'It was the 'Our Crowd' German-Jewish clientele for which the firm was mostly, and justly, noted in those days.' That included Otto H. Kahn, Felix M. Warburg, Walter N. Rothschild, and Jacob Schiff. The three early Jewish partners contributed to many Jewish organizations, such as the Educational Alliance founded in 1889, the Montefiore Hospital for Chronic Invalids, the Jewish Board of Guardians, the Federation for the Support of Jewish Philanthropic Societies of New York City, and the Jewish Theological Seminary of America [where the Chertoff family is deeply connected].

Judge Hellerstein's close family connection to the Rothschild-funded Mossad company responsible for the terror attacks of 9-11 explains why he was chosen to handle the 9-11 tort litigation.  He was chosen to manage the 9-11 litigation to protect the 9-11 deception - and the guilty - by blocking discovery and preventing a trial.  When Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein closes the book on the 9-11 litigation having settled all the cases out of court without a trial, I suspect he will have to retire in Israel.  Knowing very well how he and his Zionist cronies have obstructed justice for so many people, his fear will not let him live in peace among those he has wronged so grievously. 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "The Murderous Mossad and 9-11", March 23, 2010

Bollyn, Christopher, "Is 9-11 Judge Hellerstein Working for Israel?" October 23, 2007

Bollyn, Christopher, "The Judicial Hijacking of the 9-11 Victim Lawsuits", April 14, 2006

Bollyn, Christopher, "9-11 Judge Hellerstein 'Slams' 9-11 Widow Ellen Mariani", December 6, 2007

Bollyn, Christopher, "Judge Forces Families to Settle Out of Court", September 9, 2007

Bollyn, Christopher, "Elbit - The Hellerstein Connection to 9-11", August 3, 2009

Bollyn, Christopher, "Michael Chertoff's Childhood in Israel", October 26, 2007

Code of Conduct for United States Judges, Checklists for Financial and Other Conflicts of Interest

"Empathetic Judge in 9/11 Suits Seen by Some as Interfering", By Mireya Navarro, New York Times, May 2, 2010

Guide to Judiciary Policies & Procedures, Chapter 2, especially on Conflicts of Interest

"NY man sentenced in terrorism financing case", By Colleen Long, Associated Press, April 19, 2010

"Silverstein Seeks Unsealing of Property Damage Deal", by Mark Hamblett, New York Law Journal, April 16, 2010

Website of Amit, Pollak, Matalon & Co. on Joseph Z. Hellerstein

Website of Catalyst Fund on Boaz Harel and Cyalume

Website of Cukierman & Company on Roger Cukierman and Boaz Harel

Website of Stroock, Stroock & Lavan

How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11

Updated - May 5, 2010

Badness always manifests in destruction and corruption, while goodness always manifests in preservation and benefit.
- Socrates in Plato’s Republic (ca. 374 B.C.)

"Wanted" posters of Ehud Olmert and Ehud Barak in Jerusalem, April 2010.  Olmert and Barak are accused of bribery and corruption in Israel and indictable for serious war crimes in Gaza.  Both men are architects of the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.  Olmert, for example, was on a secret visit in New York City on 9-11.  When will we see posters in the United States calling for the arrest of Olmert and Barak?

IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation - period.
- Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former director of Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College

“And how can it be profitable for a person’s immorality to go unnoticed and unpunished?  The consequence of a criminal getting away with his crimes is that he becomes a worse person.”
- Socrates in Plato’s Republic, "Happiness and Unhappiness"

Ehud Barak, Israel's defense minister, has been in the United States for a week of meetings and speeches.  He is, in my opinion, the key suspect of being the mastermind of the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.  I am providing this brief article to explain how I think he did it. 

Within minutes of the airplane crashes on 9-11, Ehud Barak (the founder and master of the Israeli military's covert operation force, the Sayeret Matkal) was in the London studio of the BBC World ready to provide a plausible (and political) explanation to the world.  Barak, the real mastermind of 9-11, was the first person to call for a "War on Terror" - and U.S. intervention in Afghanistan and the Middle East.  This is how false-flag terrorism works.  The perpetrator is the first one to assign blame by pointing his finger at his enemy in order to shape public opinion, which is the real purpose of such atrocities.

Ehud Barak (Brug) was born at Kibbutz Mishmar Hasharon on 12 February 1942.  He enlisted in the Israeli Army at age 17, became a career army officer, and helped to found and lead the elite Sayeret Matkal covert operations commando unit.  After serving as head of Israeli Intelligence and Central Command during the 1980s, Barak was appointed IDF Chief of Staff, in 1991.  Barak was Israel's minister of defense during Israel's assault on the Gaza Strip in 2008-2009.  Based on the report of the U.N. Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, written by Justice Richard Goldstone, Barak is legally responsible for a host of war crimes committed during that assault.  The United States (and all other nations who have ratified the Geneva Conventions) are obliged to arrest Ehud Barak based on the evidence and findings presented in the Goldstone report. 

Hillary Clinton laughing at her "friend" Ehud Barak's joke about her bat mitzvah as if his joke (delivered in barely understandable English) was hilarious.  This is bizarre behavior (for a U.S. Secretary of State) and a classic example of how one overreacts to conceal an unpleasant situation.  Clinton's reaction is meant to mask a sordid and sinister relationship between high-level criminals.  Americans and Israelis certainly deserve better leaders.

At the American Jewish Committee gala dinner on April 29 Clinton again displays bizarre behavior vis-a-vis Ehud Barak.  Is this proper behavior for a U.S. Secretary of State? 

Ehud Barak at a news conference at the Department of Defense

Socrates' point that unpunished criminals become worse is very much the story of modern Israel.  The most serious criminals of the Zionist state have never been punished in any meaningful way by the international community - or the United States.  This laissez faire attitude regarding Zionist criminals has only enabled and emboldened the most unscrupulous and aggressive criminals to rise to the top of the Israeli government, where they sit today.  The criminal audacity of Israel's leaders is, however, simply not sustainable for the long term because their rampant criminality endangers the Zionist state, its citizens, and even its supporters. 

Zionist Jews and Israelis living in America, for example, may find themselves in a very uncomfortable position when millions of Americans realize that Israel and its supporters are behind the mass murder of 9-11 and the cover-up of the truth, as Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former director of the Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College, has repeatedly warned.  It seems to be only a matter of time before this uncomfortable situation becomes a reality.  It should be noted that the Israeli prime minister at the time of the attacks was Ariel Sharon, a Zionist extremist and terrorist who believes that American Jews (actually all Jews) should live in Israel.  Sharon had a dream that one million American Jews would emigrate to Israel, while in reality more Israelis have chosen to live in America.  Was 9-11 designed to force Jews to move to Israel? 

Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak (left) talks with Minister of Pensioner Affairs Rafi Eitan as Prime Minister Ehud Olmert (center) waits to start the weekly cabinet meeting May 25, 2008 in Jerusalem. Eitan is wanted by the FBI for his role as the spymaster of Jonathan Pollard.  Olmert was in New York City on 9-11 on a visit that has been kept secret.  These three men know very well who was behind the terrorism of 9-11 - and it wasn't Osama Bin Laden and his band of twenty thieves.

Ehud Barak was prime minister of Israel from July 1999 until March 7, 2001, when he was replaced by Ariel Sharon.  I attended an event at the Chicago campus of the University of Illinois where both Barak, then prime minister, and Sharon were involved shortly before the election that brought Sharon to power.  The fact that Barak and Sharon had travelled to Chicago together illustrated the utter fakeness of their rivalry.  

Previous positions held by Barak include Head of Defense Planning and Budgeting, Head of the Israeli Intelligence Community, Chief of the General Staff of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Minister of the Interior in Prime Minister Itzhak Rabin's cabinet, Minister of Foreign Affairs in the Shimon Peres cabinet, and Labor Party Chairman.  If Israel is involved in 9-11, as Dr. Alan Sabrosky says (and which the evidence strongly indicates) Barak certainly knows all about it.

When Sharon assumed power in March 2001, Barak came to America.  He supposedly came to the United States to work as a special advisor for Electronic Data Systems and as a partner with SCP Partners, a Mossad-run private equity company focused on "security-related" work - but this was merely his cover.  His real assignment was to oversee the terror attacks of 9-11.  As a partner with SCP Partners Barak was well placed to supervise the false-flag terror operation.  The complex false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 required that the mastermind of the operation be in the country to manage the critical details.

One of the key aspects of 9-11 that Barak needed to arrange was the production and application of an advanced form of super-thermite, an extremely powerful explosive produced using nano-technology.  In 2001, SCP Partners happened to have a suitable company in their portfolio, a private company called Metallurg Holdings, Inc., which has its office in Wayne, Pennsylvania.  Today, SCP has another company called Advanced Metallurgical Group, N.V. (AMG) in its portfolio.  AMG and Metallurg actually share the same phone number and address at 435 Devon Park Drive in Wayne.  SCP Private Equity Partners L.P. and its management company named Safeguard International, which controls the metallurgical subsidiaries, are also both based at this address.  AMG/Safeguard International have several subsidiaries, including one that specializes in the production of atomized aluminum (a crucial component of super-thermite) and others which manufacture specialized coatings of nano-composites. 

SCP Partners, where Ehud Barak worked from 2001 until 2007, clearly had the capability in 2001 to produce nano-composite explosives like the super-thermite used to pulverize the World Trade Center on 9-11.  There are very few companies or countries in the world that had the capability to manufacture super-thermite in 2001, but Ehud Barak and his SCP Partners did.  Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida, on the other hand, did not and could not have had anything to do with the super-thermite found in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers.  The government version is a pack of lies designed to start a pre-planned war of aggression against Afghanistan.  Ehud Barak was actually the first person to call for the U.S. to invade Afghanistan, something he did only hours after the attacks.

Chips of super-thermite found in the dust of the World Trade Center by Dr. Steven E. Jones

Rafi Eitan, the octogenarian Mossadnik who ran a spy operation against the United States using Jonathan Pollard, fled to Israel after Pollard was caught in 1985.  Eitan was then offered the position as head of state-owned Israel Chemicals Corporation, which also has production and manufacturing facilities in the United States.  In 1978, when Israeli intelligence began planning the false-flag terror operation of 9-11 (according to the documented comments of senior Mossadnik Isser Harel), Eitan was serving as Menachem Begin's "advisor on terrorism".  This is the real reason that Rafi Eitan remained in the Israeli security cabinet until 2009 - he is one of the architects of 9-11.  

Rafi Eitan was also involved in the 1968 theft and illegal smuggling of nearly 600 pounds of plutonium from a plant in Pennsylvania to Israel for the production of nuclear weapons.  As the Pittsburgh Tribune reported in a series of articles about the stolen plutonium, Eitan is the key suspect:

Four other Israelis visited NUMEC on Sept. 10, 1968, and met with Shapiro [then-NUMEC President Zalman M. Shapiro, a staunch supporter of Israel] to "discuss thermoelectric devices (unclassified)," according to a Sept. 12, 1968, letter from Bruce D. Rice, NUMEC security manager, to Harry R. Walsh, director of AEC security and property management, seeking AEC approval for the visit.

The four visitors were: Avraham Hermoni, Ephraim Beigon, Abraham Bendor and Raphael (or, Rafael) Eitan.

In their 1991 book, "Dangerous Liaison," Andrew and Leslie Cockburn wrote, "At the time of his visit to Apollo in 1968, Eitan was acting as an agent for Mossad on special assignment to LAKAM ... a shadowy intelligence agency ... born in the 1950s with the express purpose of acquiring nuclear technology by any means."

Soon after the men's visit, 587 pounds of weapons-grade uranium reportedly went missing from NUMEC, according to Udall's papers.

In a recent article entitled "America’s Loose Nukes in Israel," Grant Smith wrote:  "To date, all of the uranium-diversion masterminds, financiers, and beneficiaries have escaped criminal prosecution, even as U.S. taxpayers fund a nuclear waste cleanup at the (now defunct) NUMEC Apollo facility."

Eitan's unscrupulous character can be seen in a comment he made to the wife and lawyer for Jonathan Pollard, the captured spy he had managed: 

Eitan told us the only thing he regrets about the Pollard affair is that he did not 'finish the job' before leaving the States. We asked him what he meant by this. Eitan replied, "If I had been at the embassy when Pollard came to seek asylum, I would have put a bullet through his head. There would have been no Pollard affair."
- Esther Pollard, Maariv, March 30, 2006

Raphael Hantman a.k.a. Rafi Eitan
“In principle, when there is a war on terror you conduct it without principles. You simply fight it."  – Rafi Eitan to Ha’aretz, February 19, 2010

At SCP Partners Barak worked closely with another Mossadnik named Eitan - Yaron I. Eitan.  Although Yaron Eitan looks very much like Rafi Eitan, the relationship between the two Eitans is not known.  Rafi Eitan was actually born Raphael Hantman in Mandate Palestine to Noah Hantman from Minsk, Byelorussia.  Rafi reportedly has three children, named Yael, Sharon, and Yuval.

Yaron I. Eitan 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"America’s Loose Nukes in Israel", by Grant Smith, April 14, 2010

Biography of Ehud Barak

"Government agencies investigated missing uranium, NUMEC", by Mary Ann Thomas and Ramesh Santanam, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, August 25, 2002   

Obama is Obliged to Arrest Ehud Barak - 9-11 Mastermind and War Criminal

April 25, 2010

Ehud Barak, an indicted war criminal and mastermind of the terror attacks of 9-11 arrives in Washington on Sunday, April 25.  Barak will be in the U.S. for one full week.  This gives Americans one week to protest Barak's visit - and the government one week to arrest this war criminal and terrorist.  Demand Barak's arrest for war crimes and terrorism! Nail the Israeli mastermind of 9-11.

All four of the 1949 Geneva Conventions oblige the United States to search for and try those suspected of grave breaches (which Ehud Barak is due to the findings of the U.N. Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict) regardless of the suspect's home country or the site of the crime. "Each High Contracting Party shall be under the obligation to search for persons alleged to have committed, or to have ordered to have committed, such grave breaches, and shall bring such persons, regardless of their nationality, before its own courts," or hand them over "to another High Contracting Party concerned."

War criminal and terrorist Ehud Barak will be speaking at an event with Hillary Clinton on April 29 in Washington, D.C.  Hillary Clinton should have this man arrested as soon as he arrives in the United States on April 25.  He is an indicted war criminal (based on the UN Report on War Crimes in Gaza by Justice Richard Goldstone) - and the key suspect of the terrorism of 9-11.  What is she doing smiling like a silly schoolgirl at this evil architect of terrorism? 

Ehud Barak, an indicted war criminal and chief suspect of the false-flag terror of 9-11 is in the United States, again.  He will be speaking at a Zionist event in Washington, D.C. along with Hillary Clinton.  This presents the ironic situation where the U.S. Secretary of State will be sharing the podium with the Israeli war criminal who is suspected of being the chief architect of 9-11.  Why are Israeli war criminals and terrorists coddled and enabled by the West while others are hounded, arrested, and tried at the International Criminal Court at The Hague?  What sense is there in allowing war criminals to run a state like Israel - creating an outlaw pariah state that practices terrorism and uses Jews as human shields?  Who benefits by the existence of such a criminal state?

Barak flew to Washington Sunday, April 25, to meet with U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates.  This means that Barak will be in Washington, D.C. for one week, an unusually long visit for an Israeli defense minister.  Why is Barak, the mastermind of 9-11 and indicted war criminal spending a week in the United States?  Is he fine-tuning plans for another war of aggression with his Zionist co-conspirators in the U.S. government and media? 

Ehud Barak was the first person to call for U.S. intervention in Afghanistan - on 9-11.  His partner Bibi Netanyahu, who he commanded in the Sayeret Matkal, said the terror attacks were "very good" as they would bring immediate sympathy for Israel.  Netanyahu expressed his perverse pleasure with the terror atrocity of 9-11 when tens of thousands of Americans were thought to have perished.  These Zionist extremists are stark raving mad.  They put all Americans in danger, Gentiles and Jews alike.  Israelis and Zionist Jews will find themselves in the greatest danger with such fanatic leaders.

Israeli Minister of Defense Ehud Barak in his military uniform with the red beret of the Sayeret Matkal, the special forces where he was a commander along with Jonatan and Bibi Netanyahu.  Barak and Netanyahu created the Jonatan Institute as a think tank/college of terrorism.  George H.W. Bush was one of their first students.

Will Americans protest the presence of this war criminal in their nation's capital?  Will good Jews stand up against the Zionist terrorists who endanger world peace - and their security?  Will the U.S. media ask Ehud Barak what Ehud Olmert was doing in New York City on 9-11 and why that visit has been kept secret?  Will the reporters ask who was on the El Al plane that left New York City on the afternoon of 9-11?

The American Jewish Committee of New York announced that U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Israel Defense Minister Ehud Barak will address AJC’s Annual Gala on April 29 in Washington, D.C. at the Grand Hyatt Hotel (owned by the Zionist Pritzker family of Chicago).

“We are thrilled to host Secretary Clinton, and Ministers Barak, Moratinos and Verhagen, and look forward to hearing their perspectives on the global challenges confronting the U.S. and Europe,” said AJC Executive Director David Harris.

Americans should protest the war criminal Barak's visit and demand that he be arrested as the U.S. government is obliged to do under international law.  The people must lead when the government is weak and corrupt.  Barak is the mastermind of 9-11.  Doesn't that mean anything to anyone?

Source:  American Jewish Committee website

The Goldman Scam & John Paulson's Links to 9-11

April 20, 2010

The latest news about the fraud at Goldman Sachs confirms what I have been saying all along about the financial "meltdown" and government bail-outs of 2008-2009 - it was a massive Zionist fraud, which I called the Fleecing of America.  Will Hutton of Britain's Observer reported on 18 April 2010 in an article entitled "Now we know the truth.  The financial meltdown wasn't a mistake – IT WAS A CON" - 

The global financial crisis, it is now clear, was caused not just by the bankers' colossal mismanagement. No, it was due also to the new financial complexity offering up the opportunity for widespread, systemic fraud...

Beneath the complexity, the charges are all rooted in the same phenomenon – deception. Somebody, somewhere, was knowingly fooled by banks and bankers – sometimes governments over tax, sometimes regulators and investors over the probity of balance sheets and profits and sometimes, as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) says in Goldman's case, by creating a scheme to enrich one favoured investor at the expense of others – including, via RBS, the British [and U.S.] taxpayer.

The man at the center of this particular scam is a man named John Alfred Paulson and his company.  The New York Times reports that Paulson personally made an estimated $3.7 billion in 2007 as a result of his hedge fund’s performance, and another $2 billion in 2008.  The charge is that Goldman's vice-president Fabrice Tourre created a dud financial instrument packed with valueless sub-prime mortgages at the instruction of hedge fund client Paulson, sold it to investors knowing it was valueless, and then allowed Paulson to profit from the dud financial instrument.

John Alfred Paulson

As the Observer reported on April 18:

The reality was that Paulson was frantically buying credit default swaps in the CDO that would go up in price the more valueless it became – a trade that would make more than $1 billion. Worse, Paulson had identified some of the dud sub-prime mortgages that he wanted Tourre to put into the CDO. If the SEC case is true, this was a scam – nothing more, nothing less.


Following Harvard Business School, Paulson began his career working as a Management Consultant at Boston Consulting Group from 1980 to 1982 (where Benjamin Netanyahu began his career in 1976) and as an Associate at Odyssey Partners from 1982 to 1984.  Paulson's career at Odyssey Partners brought him into a small circle of Zionist finance scoundrels comprised of Stephen Berger, Leon Levy, and Jack Nash.

John Paulson and Stephen Berger joined Odyssey Partners in 1982, the year it was founded by Jack Nash (left) and Leon Levy (right).

The late Jack Nash (in 1995) was a devoted Zionist supporter and chairman of the American Friends of the Israel Museum in Jerusalem (AFIM).  His wife Helen is currently a vice president of the Zionist organization, of which the Baroness Nadine de Rothschild is the Honorary President and Jo Carole Lauder, the wife of Ronald Lauder, is an executive committee board member.

Ronald Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress and close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, looks pretty miserable for a multi-millionaire Zionist in his mid-60s (even with his secretive Israeli girlfriend/Mossad handler/art dealer Daniella Luxembourg).  Lauder was the driving force behind the privatization of the World Trade Center, a key part of the 9-11 plot.  Guilt destroys a person up from inside.  There is no escape, Ron.

Lauder's full-time Mossad handler Daniella Luxembourg and "contemporary art specialist" Amalia Dayan, both of Phillips, de Pury & Luxembourg.  Dayan is the grand-daughter of Moshe Dayan.  The world of Zionist terrorism is small and based on certain family ties.  The Zionist terrorist regime of Israel today is very much like the Sicarii Zealots of the First Century.  The Sicarii were Jewish robbers and terrorists who killed other Jews to further their extremist ends.  Facing the power of the Roman army, the Sicarii wound up killing hundreds of Jews in the massacre of Masada.  The Israeli terrorist regime of Netanyahu and Barak uses Jews as human shields, which endangers all Jews, Zionist and non-Zionist, in the same way as the Sicarii of Masada in the First Century.  Israel today is becoming more and more like one huge Masada

...AND 9-11

Stephen Berger

Stephen Berger was executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (1985-1990), the owner of the World Trade Center, when Atwell Security, a Mossad company, received the security contract in 1987.  The Israel's Mossad attempt to obtain the security contract for the Port Authority in 1987 involved Mossad intelligence chief-cum-art dealer Peter Zvi Malkin.  Michael Chertoff's mother, Livia Eisen, was also a Mossadnik art dealer in Elizabeth, New Jersey.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Now we know the truth. The financial meltdown wasn't a mistake – it was a con," by Will Hutton, The Observer (U.K.), April 18, 2010

The Architecture of Terror:  Mapping the Network Behind 9-11   

Bollyn, Christopher, “The Fleecing of America: 9-11 and the Crisis on Wall Street,” Chapter XI of Solving 9-11:  The Deception that Changed the World


The Gang of Czech Jews around the Collapses of 9-11

April 13, 2010

Anders Björkman's article about the collapse of the World Trade Center entitled, "Discussion of 'What Did and Did Not Cause Collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers in New York' by Bazant, Le, Greening and Benson" is scheduled for publication in the July 2010 issue of the Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

Fig. 6 - "Crush down" between floors 85 and 75. Upper Part C is evidently not visible, nor is Part B - Rubble/debris. It should be clear to everybody that WTC 1 is now blown apart by energy released inside the tower as described here.

In his recent posting "What did and did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York," Björkman wrote:

The Bazant theory can evidently not be verified in a laboratory or in reality for any structure of any size...

No structure of any size can be crushed by an upper part of itself from top down by gravity...

Question remains why Bazant & Co suggest the opposite? It is insane! Are Bazant & Co part of the conspiracy to destroy the WTC at NY?


Is Zdenek Bazant part of the conspiracy to destroy the World Trade Center?  Bazant is the Czech Jew who had a scientific paper ready - one day after 9-11 - to provide an explanation for how the Twin Towers were collapsed and pulverized - without explosives.  Frank Lampl is the Czech Jew whose company, Bovis Lend Lease, cleaned up the rubble of the World Trade Center, which had been leased by Frank Lowy, another Czech Jew, who had obtained the lease to the towers with Larry Silverstein just 6 weeks before they were destroyed.  

What is it with these Czech Jews and 9-11?  Is this an international gang of criminals or what?  Are they connected to the Czech Jew Madeleine Korbel Albright (born Marie Jana Korbelová in Prague, May 15, 1937) daughter of Josef Korbel, the mentor of George W. Bush's Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice?  What a small world.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"The Dirty Business Behind the 9-11 Clean-up," April 11, 2010

"Fire Did Not Collapse WTC - Swedish Structural Engineer," January 8, 2008

The Dirty Business Behind the 9-11 Clean-up

April 11, 2010

The discovery by Professor Steven Jones of tiny chips of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center has greatly improved our understanding of what happened on 9-11.  With this evidence in hand we have a much better understanding of how the Twin Towers were pulverized.  The crucial questions about 9-11 remain:  Who made this nanotech super-thermite?  And who put it in the Twin Towers?

The red-gray chips of super-thermite found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center have fundamentally changed our understanding of what happened on 9-11.

Seeing that an advanced nano-composite form of thermite was used to demolish the buildings, we can now understand that the clean-up was actually a well-planned operation to remove and destroy the evidence of the crime.  Every aspect of the well-planned false flag terror atrocity of 9-11 was completely controlled and compartmentalized, the hallmarks of a Mossad (Ehud Barak) operation.  Every part of the operation is carried out by people and companies that are controlled by the architects of terrorism.  They are all essentially part of the same team - the Israeli terror team - and can be controlled and trusted, from the top down.  With this in mind, we begin our review of the people who cleaned up the World Trade Center.

THE RESCUE CHIEF - From September 12, 2001 until July 11, 2002, Martin Seigel of Freehold, New Jersey, was "rescue chief" and director of field operations for Bovis Landfill, which won the contract to clear the debris of the World Trade Center.  (Photo from Aftermath by Joel Meyerowitz)

"From 12 September until 11 July," Martin Seigel (sometimes written Marty Siegel), "was director of field operations, overseeing the rescue on behalf of Bovis Landfill, which won the contract to clear the debris," The Observer (U.K.) reported on August 18, 2002.  How was Bovis chosen so quickly? one might ask.  Martin Seigel began working on the pile of rubble already on September 12, 2001?  How did a subsidiary of Bovis Lend Lease, a British-owned company headed by Frank Lampl ("Life President" of the company) win the contract in less than one day?  What kind of selection process was used?  Why such haste to hire companies to remove the debris - before the bodies are recovered and the evidence is examined?

One has to understand that 9-11 was planned well in advance, which means that the removal and destruction of the evidence was also planned to be assigned to companies that could be trusted to follow orders and keep secrets.  There is no way that the architects of the false flag terror of 9-11 were going to let honest engineers anywhere near the evidence of the crime.  The World Trade Center is owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey so it stands to reason that Bovis Lend Lease was chosen by Lewis Eisenberg then director of the Port Authority (until December 2001).  Eisenberg, as chairman of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, personally arranged the privatization of the World Trade Center property and oversaw the negotiations that delivered the leases into the private hands of Silverstein and Lowy.  (See - "The Zionists Who Gained from 9-11").  Eisenberg is part of the Zionist circle of 9-11 culprits.

Frank Lampl, a Czech Jew, is "Life President" of Bovis Lend Lease

Frank Lampl, the "Life President" of Bovis Lend Lease, is a Jew from Brünn (Brno) who emigrated to Britain in 1968.  According to his biography, his son Thomas was studying at Oxford University in 1968 when Frank and his wife decided to leave Czechoslovakia.  He joined Bovis in 1971 and rose quickly to become chief executive of Bovis International in 1978.  Bovis has done many large jobs in the United States, including the construction management contract for the Atlanta Olympic Games.

Sir Frank Lampl (knighted by the Queen) is the first Honorary President of the Czech British Chamber of Commerce, a position he has held since March 2009.  He has also established a branch of Bovis in Brno, his hometown in the Czech Republic.  Bovis has two locations in Brno, one at the hospital and another near the technical university, where nanotechnology is developed.

Lampl's Bovis Lend Lease is a company that has long been engaged in nanotechnology research as well.  Since the 1990s, Bovis has been involved in the development of nanotechnology labs, such as those in which the super-thermite used on 9-11 was made.  Bovis company archives indicate that the company has been involved in nanotechnology production since at least October 2000.  (See: Bovis Lend Lease Launches New Pharmaceutical Business, October 30, 2000.)  

Did Bovis produce the super-thermite that pulverized the Twin Towers?  It's certainly possible.  Was the nano-thermite of 9-11 made in the Czech Republic?  It's also possible. 

The CV of design manager Richard Paley, former Principal Architect at Bovis Lend Lease, indicates that he was designing nanotechnology clean rooms for Bovis Lend Lease for the better part of a decade, starting with a 4 year stint from October 1990 until October 1994:

Senior Architect
Bovis Lend Lease
(Public Company; LLC; Construction industry)

October 1990 — October 1994 (4 years 1 month)
[Employed by Tanvec Ltd , bought by Bovis Lend Lease in 1999] - Role involved design of cleanrooms , laboratories and production facilities for the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and process industries. Responsible for compliance with planning and building regulations and compliance with MHRA and FDA regulations.

See:  Richard Paley CV

Sir Frank Lampl is also a friend of Ehud Barak, the Israeli minister of defense who is responsible for the war crimes committed in Gaza in Israel's operation "Cast Lead" of December 2008 and January 2009.  Some 1,400 Palestinian civilians were killed in this criminal assault on the people of the Gaza Strip.  In October 2009, Sir Frank Lampl, a partner of Forum 2000, sponsored an international conference in which Ehud Barak was one of the key speakers.  Why would Ehud Barak, an Israeli terrorist who should be arrested for war crimes, be allowed to speak at an international forum on "Democracy and Freedom" in Prague in 2009?  What is the real connection between Israeli criminals and the Czech Republic?

Ehud Barak, indicted for serious war crimes by the Goldstone Report, spoke at Forum 2000 in October 2009, an event sponsored by Sir Frank Lampl.  What a small world.

Frank Lampl's connection with Ehud Barak is most telling.  This is the inner circle of 9-11.  These are the key suspects in the false flag terror atrocity of 9-11.  Barak is the senior architect of the terror attacks and Lampl was the loyal Zionist Jew who helped destroy the evidence. 

( be continued...)

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Foreign Firms Destroyed Crucial Evidence," August 14, 2002

Bollyn, "The Zionists Who Gained from 9-11," June 19, 2002

Sir Frank Lampl, Czech British Chamber of Commerce Honory President, March 2, 2009

Bovis Lend Lease Launches New Pharmaceutical Business, 30 October 2000

"Ehud Barak, Israel's Defense Minister and Former Prime Minister" by Pierre Tristam

"9/11 - one year on - 'Butterflies rose out of the debris'", Sean O'Hagan, The Observer, 18 August 2002

Richard Paley’s Experience, Design Manager & Chartered Architect

"Israel Did 9-11" - U.S. Military Expert Supports Bollyn Thesis

April 3, 2010

"What we need to stand up and say is that not only did they attack the USS Liberty, they did 9/11. They did it.  I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period . . . And the Zionists are playing this as truly an all-or-nothing exercise, because if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what happened, they're done."

Source:  Full Transcript of Sabrosky Interview, March 21, 2010

 "9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period . . . And the Zionists are playing this as truly an all-or-nothing exercise, because if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what happened, they're done." - Dr. Alan N. Sabrosky

Dr. Alan Ned Sabrosky, an expert author on military and foreign policy matters, is making huge waves in the 9-11 truth community with his interviews in which he says that he is 100 percent certain that 9-11 was a Mossad operation carried out to usher in the Zionist-designed War on Terror - and that he has conveyed this information to the highest levels of the U.S. military.  The invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan have resulted in more than 60,000 U.S. casualties (dead and injured), Sabrosky said.  Sabrosky has also recently written an article entitled "Zionism Unmasked:  The Dark Face of Jewish Nationalism."

"Zionism Unmasked: The Dark Face Of Jewish Nationalism"

Alan Sabrosky is a writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. He is listed in WHO'S WHO IN THE EAST (23rd ed.). A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College, Dr. Sabrosky's teaching and research appointments have included the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Middlebury College and Catholic University; while in government service, he held concurrent adjunct professorships at Georgetown University and the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Dr. Sabrosky has lectured widely on defense and foreign affairs in the United States and abroad. 

The description of Dr. Sabrosky (born 1941) taken from his 1989 paper entitled, "Of Smoke and Mirrors:  Grand Strategy by Commission," shows that he has excellent credentials to support his positions. 

Dr. Alan Ned Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is a military affairs writer and consultant.  He was formerly Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and also holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research at the U.S. Army War College.  A Marine during the Vietnam War, he has taught at West Point and is a 1986 graduate of the Army War College.  He has published ten books and monographs and over 80 articles and reviews on defense and foreign policy.

In Dr. Sabrosky's interview with Kevin Barrett on March 30, he explains how he came to the conclusion that Israeli intelligence carried out 9-11:

"When you look at the one thing that could have done it as an organization, Mossad is almost by default the only one left standing. When people in the 9/11 Truth Movement... ask, 'where's the beef'-- the evidence is there. The only piece of evidence lacking is a public confession by one of the architects of the operation, and that is not going to be forthcoming, any more than public confessions by serial capital murderers are common in criminal cases. It's not going to be there."

This is correct.  In a highly-secretive Israeli false-flag terror operation like 9-11, which I believe was directed by Ehud Barak, there is a very high degree of compartmentalization, which means there are a lot of people who did and know something about the operation but very few who know the whole thing.  Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, and Shimon Peres would be among those at the architectural level who know the whole picture.  It is, of course, unlikely that any of the architectural level planners will be coming forward with confessions any time soon.  This is why they have to be publicly shamed, constantly and relentlessly, whenever they travel outside of Israel - and hopefully soon by righteous Jews in Israel.

What I hope will happen is that some one who was involved in putting the super-thermite in the World Trade Center will come forward.  This would reveal the source of the extremely advanced nano-thermite that pulverized the Twin Towers.  There must be quite a few people involved in the preparation of the towers for demolition.

Whenever any of these high-level planners, which would include Ehud Olmert, come to the United States they should be met by protestors who carry placards asking the key questions.  In Olmert's case the question is:  Mr. Olmert - What were you doing in New York City on 9-11 and when did you leave?  This question should also be asked of Rudi Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg.  No Israeli official should be allowed to appear anywhere in the United States without a protest by 9-11 truth seekers and grilling with all the questions about Israeli involvement in 9-11.

Dr. Sabrosky continued:

"For Mossad to have been the primary actor, given the target - us - there had to have been approval for this-- for the length of time involved, the location, the people who owned and ran security for the World Trade Centers-- there had to have been approval from the highest levels of the Israeli government."

This is quite correct.  As I have explained in my book, Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World, the false-flag terror of 9-11 was originally planned during the late 1970s, when the arch-terrorist Menachem Begin was prime minister of Israel.  Benjamin Netanyahu and Begin's son Benny are currently at the head of the Likud party.  The Israeli logic for 9-11 has always been to force the United States to deploy the U.S. military into the Middle East where it would engage and occupy those states that are hostile to the militant Zionist state of Israel.

Benjamin Netanyahu is a disciple of the Zionist terrorist Menachem Begin (and Ze'ev Jabotinsky).  The false-flag terrorism of 9-11 was evidently first planned during the reign of Begin in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

As a person who has spent most of his career in military institutions it is not surprising that Dr. Sabrosky calls for a military response against Israel.  As he said in the interview of March 21:

I'll tell you - I have a dream, as Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, and my dream is that the 5th and 6th US fleets take Israel and cream it.  And that's the end of it.

Here I disagree with Dr. Sabrosky.  It would not be correct or proper to "cream" Israel in response to their fanatic leaders (Peres, Netanyahu, and Barak) having committed 9-11.  It was not correct to kill innocent Afghans or Iraqis as a response to 9-11 and it would not be correct to kill innocent Israelis or Palestinians either.  Such indiscriminate killing would make us no better than the terrorists who committed 9-11.  A military response which targeted the Israeli government and military for having committed 9-11, however, would be a proper and just response.  A military invasion to overthrow the Zionist regime for having committed the terror atrocity of 9-11 and its long history of aggression and crimes against humanity would be the proper thing to do.  Given the fact, however, that the U.S. military takes its orders from the president, this is highly unlikely to happen.  But there is another solution - and it is something we can all do.

Many unpopular regimes have fallen in the past thirty years without a shot being fired.  The Soviet Union (and the Warsaw Pact communist regimes) and the apartheid state of South Africa, for example, collapsed without any war being fought.   The same thing could happen to the racist Zionist regime in Palestine.

A proper investigation of 9-11 would reveal to the whole world the Israeli criminals behind the terror atrocity that changed the world.  It would also expose the Zionists in the United States, (e.g. Michael Chertoff, Dov Zakheim, Larry Silverstein, Ronald Lauder, and Alvin Hellerstein, et al.) who have committed treason by supporting the Israeli criminals.  The real criminals then should be arrested, wherever they might be, and tried for involvement in the terror atrocity of 9-11. 

This is, of course, what Americans have wanted all along.  It has not happened because the institutions that should have done this have all been hijacked by Zionist criminals like Michael Chertoff and Alvin Hellerstein.  The investigation was hijacked by Chertoff and the litigation process has been hijacked by Hellerstein.  Chertoff and Hellerstein are only the most visible Zionist faces in this crime.  There are other less visible Zionists who are also key players in this massive criminal conspiracy.  The Zionists who control the U.S. mass media, for example, are also involved in covering up the truth of 9-11.

We should not wait for the U.S. government or military to take action against the real criminals of 9-11 as this may never happen.  We already have sufficient evidence that Israel's criminal leaders and their Zionist agents in the United States are behind 9-11.  We should expose their treason (e.g. Zakheim, Chertoff, Hellerstein, Silverstein, et al.) and involvement in crimes of terrorism and shame them constantly and relentlessly.  We should also demand that our governments and the institutions we are involved in withdraw all support for the state of Israel.  This is something we all can do.

The Kevin Barrett show with Alan Sabrosky can be listened to via the clickable link below.

"Was 9/11 a Mossad operation?"
Alan Sabrosky on Kevin Barrett Show, March 30, 2010

For an American military expert like Dr. Sabrosky to openly support my thesis is a very positive development for the 9-11 truth movement -- and very good for me personally.  To have a person with the experience and credentials of Dr. Sabrosky confirming my analysis that Israeli military intelligence carried out 9-11, a controversial thesis I have investigated and developed since September 2001, is very encouraging.  Many people may now come forward and say that they have known this all along, but I can say that this has been a very unpopular position, one which has not been supported in the so-called 9-11 truth movement.  I have, nonetheless, been able to present my thesis and discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 in numerous conferences across Europe and the United States. 

Bollyn at the Axis for Peace conference in Brussels, November 2005

During the 9-11 Truth Tour in Europe in May-June 2005 (funded by Jimmy Walter), I was the only person who spoke about the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11.  I was also the only person on the tour who was censored because my thesis was so controversial.  In Vienna, Jenna Orkin from New York succeeded in keeping me from speaking by threatening Jimmy Walter and the local promotional agency that the whole Vienna show would be shut down if my "anti-Semitic" views about 9-11 were expressed.  Orkin had tried, unsuccessfully, to keep me from being part of the European tour.  I have been excluded from most so-called 9-11 truth events because my research has yielded findings of fact that were unacceptable for those who organized the events.  Israel was a sacred cow.  To blame Israeli intelligence for 9-11 was absolutely taboo.

The BBC interviewed me in London 2005 and asked me why I was the only journalist who did not believe the official version of 9-11.

Later, in 2006-2007, when I was brutally attacked and TASERed by a three-man undercover tactical squad at my home - on my property - not a single U.S. newspaper or media outlet supported me or even covered my case with any sense of fairness.  I was maliciously prosecuted for having assaulted the three heavily-armed men who invaded my property and resisting arrest.  After a very corrupt legal process I was found guilty of both misdemeanor charges in June 2007 and faced the very real possibility of one year in Chicago's notorious Cook County Jail.  At that point we realized that we could not negotiate with criminals and terrorists and were forced to leave our happy home and go into exile.

Christopher Bollyn at the Cook County Court in August 2006.

Rather than discuss my plight, CNN most unfairly tried to smear me as an anti-Semite on the Paula Zahn show the night before my trial was scheduled to begin.  The Chicago Tribune and Daily Herald (local newspaper) ignored the facts and gave me the same treatment.  Although I had appealed to then Senator Barack Obama, my Congressman, and every member of the Illinois Supreme Court for judicial fairness, not a single word of response came from any of them.  (I sent a bound document of some 150 pages to each justice on the Illinois Supreme Court in my effort to obtain a fair trial.)  Most telling was the response from organizations that are supposedly dedicated to supporting the free speech rights of journalists.  Although I contacted every single one of them, not one responded or offered assistance. 

How can it be that an American journalist is brutally attacked by undercover police at his home - in front of his 8-year-old daughter and wife, TASERed while restrained in handcuffs and unable to move a finger, with one 200-pound man kneeling on the temple of his head and another on his back, and has his arm broken - and not a single newspaper, television station, or journalist organization is concerned?  This was just the beginning of the price I have paid for my writing about 9-11, but this is why Dr. Sabrosky's revelations are so important to me.  Maybe, God willing, my family will finally be able to go home again.

The Bollyn kids in their yard.  The heavily armed three-man undercover tactical squad - who refused to identify themselves - invaded the Bollyn home, attacked, handcuffed, and then TASERed Bollyn on the spot where the lawnmower is seen.  The loss of their family home has been very hard on the Bollyn kids.

Recommended Sources:

Recommended listening:  "Was 9/11 a Mossad operation?"
Alan Sabrosky on The Kevin Barrett Show of March 30, 2010 

"The Complicated Faces of Anti-Semitism" by Dr. Alan Sabrosky,

The Shanksville Deception of 9-11

Updated February 4, 2010

Something incredibly ugly happened to Flight 93 over rural Pennsylvania on 9-11.  A mass murder atrocity could explain why the public was deceived into thinking that a small crater was the crash site while the bodies of the victims and wreckage were actually being picked up from the real debris field hundreds of meters away in the dark woods.  How many victims were there anyway?  Two hundred?  Why was the wreckage of Flight 93 kept hidden?

The scene of the crime.  The small crater in the reclaimed mine is a useful diversion.  The real debris field is several hundred meters in the woods.  Why would the government go to such lengths to keep the press and county coroner away from the evidence?  How many people were on Flight 93 when it was shot down - as Donald Rumsfeld openly admitted?

The people of Somerset, Pennsylvania, are loyal and patriotic Americans, qualities that have been exploited by the perpetrators of 9-11 to conceal the truth of what happened in the sky over the woods of Shanksville on 9-11.  Shanksville is the nearest hamlet to the so-called crash site of United Airlines Flight 93, a small crater in a reclaimed mine between Lambertsville and Shanksville. 

Having been to the area several times since 9-11, I noticed that many of the people were noticably afraid to talk about the things they had seen and noticed around Shanksville on September 11, 2001.  Several of them apologized and told me that they had been told by the F.B.I. or other agents of the U.S. government not to talk.  From others I got the clear impression that they had been warned not to talk about what they knew.  Then there are those who had obviously been told to tell lies.  I would consider Bob Leverknight to be a member of the latter group.  As I reported from Somerset:

I spoke with Bob Leverknight, correspondent with Somerset's Daily American, at the newspaper's office about how Flight 93 disappeared into the crater without leaving a trace.  Leverknight, an active member of the Air National Guard, was assigned by the editor to handle my questions.  His answers were quite incredible.  About the disappearance of the plane, Leverknight said, "It [the ground] liquefied."  One of the plane's massive engines, he said, "bounced" off the ground and was found at a very considerable distance -- in the woods.

The ground did not liquefy and swallow the plane as Bob Leverknight told me at the office of the Daily American and nothing bounced off the ground.  These are just some of the lies that surround the deception of what really happened above Shanksville on 9-11.

There was no wreckage of an airplane found anywhere near the small crater that had been made in a trench of the reclaimed mine.  The real debris field was several hundred meters in the woods. But why was it kept hidden?


The debris of Flight 93 fell in the woods and covered a large area.  This is the real debris field and was kept hidden from the view of the public and the press while the bodies and evidence were picked up.  The small crater in the reclaimed mine was most likely caused by a missile fired from the Thunderbolt aircraft that was seen circling the area before and after Flight 93 was shot down over the woods. 

The small round crater measured 20 feet in width.  The long gash was apparently pre-existing in the reclaimed mine.  A clever ruse, but not at all convincing.

The pre-existing trench is visible in this 1994 U.S.G.S (United States Geological Survey) map of the reclaimed mine.  The crater was made directly in the middle of the trench, which suggests that this location had been carefully chosen for the Flight 93 shoot down.  Were all the passengers from the different planes of 9-11 loaded onto this doomed plane at Cleveland airport?

This crater was made in the middle of the trench to provide a plausible diversion that looked like the scene of a plane crash albeit without any wreckage.  The bomb crater was made directly in the middle of the pre-existing trench which indicates that the Shanksville shoot down had been carefully planned in advance.  The public was told that the plane had crashed at the site of the crater while the real debris field was located in the woods beginning at a distance of about 100 meters in the woods, around the cottage of Barry Hoover.

Barry Hoover's cabin, where body parts were found according to Rev. Larry Hoover, is at least one hundred meters from the crater - deep in the woods.  There is no way that pieces of an airliner, luggage, and human remains flew for hundreds of meters through the thickly wooded forest.  The shock wave that devastated the Hoover cottage - and the plane - clearly came from above the woods, not from this crater in the reclaimed mine.  One hundred meters of thick woods would have protected the Hoover house from the shock wave and the trees would have lost much of their foliage.  Apart from the scorched area near the crater, the trees appear to be in good condition.

The Dayton Daily News of September 12, 2001, described the scene:

The impact of the crash left a crater estimated by authorities to be about 10 feet deep and 20 feet wide. It appeared the plane first hit on the downward slope of a hillside and then slid at least 200 yards, scorching a dense area of trees and corn fields. Officials would allow reporters no closer than 300 yards to the scene. From that vantage point, the crater appeared to be barren. Little debris could be seen, and there were no signs of victims.

"We haven't seen anything bigger than a phone book, certainly nothing that would resemble a part of a plane," said Capt. Frank Monaco of the Pennsylvania State Police.

But one Lambertsville resident, Barry Hoover, who lives a half-mile from the site, said he saw debris scattered at least a mile wide.

"There was stuff everywhere back there. It made you want to drop to your knees and cry for those people," Hoover said.

PENNSYLVANIA CRASH MAY BE KEY TO TRAGEDY - 'Black box' could give clues to disaster
Dayton Daily News (OH) - Wednesday, September 12, 2001
Author: Mike Wagner and Ken McCall

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette also described the wreckage at the Hoover property:

No people on the ground were killed in that crash. But the shock waves set off by the impact of that crash heavily damaged Hoover's home, which lies, literally, a stone's throw from the crater gouged into the earth by the doomed plane.

"Obviously, I was upset when I saw my house. Who wouldn't be?" said Hoover, 34, whose home off Lambertsville Road is believed to be the local structure most seriously damaged by the crash. "But you know, it's a house and there's nothing there that can't be replaced. The people who died can't be replaced."

...Wreckage was still burning and emergency workers were still speeding to the scene when Hoover neared his house. While it was still standing, every window and door had been blown off and obliterated, its ceilings and floor tiles had been blasted loose and much of the interior was wrecked.

"It looked like what you see after a tornado or hurricane goes through -- a total ruin," he said.

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (PA) - Friday, September 14, 2001
Author: Cindi Lash, Post-Gazette Staff Writer

To clarify the location of Barry Hoover's cottage in relation to the crater "crash site" I spoke with Reverend Larry Hoover, a Lutheran minister and father of Barry.  Larry Hoover owns the two houses on his property that begins with the treeline at the edge of the reclaimed mine. 

The cottage his son Barry lived in is about "one football field" (100 meters) into the woods from the crater, Larry Hoover said.  Larry's house is about "three football fields" from the crater, he said.  He said that luggage had been found around his house while body parts had been found more around Barry's cottage.  The Hoover property is about 7 to 9 acres, he said.  The debris was found on property belonging to three people, including the owner of the reclaimed mine.

Rev. Hoover said that he noticed that the garage door of Barry's house had been blown inside out and backwards, something he thought quite remarkable.

I wanted to know why the existence of the real debris field deep in the woods had been kept hidden so I asked Reverend Hoover, "Why have you been quiet about what happened on your property on 9-11?"

"We tried to cooperate," he said.  I knew what he meant without pressing the point.  The FBI agents had given similar orders all over Shanksville and Somerset County.  The Hoovers had been asked not to talk about what had happened on 9-11.  The public was told that the plane had crashed into the reclaimed mine while the real debris field was cleaned up in complete secrecy in the woods around the Hoover cabins.

Why has the real debris field been kept secret?  There can only be one explanation:  the truth about what happened to Flight 93 could not be revealed to the public.  The evidence indicates that Flight 93 was shot out of the sky with a blast that sounded like "an atomic bomb," as one witness told me:

Nena Lensbouer, who had prepared lunch for the workers at the scrap yard overlooking the crash site, said she was the first person to reach the crater. Lensbouer said that the crater was five to six feet deep and smaller than the 24-foot trailer in her front yard. She described the sound as "an explosion, like an atomic bomb" -- not a crash.

If Flight 93 was shot down with such precision, and the truth concealed with an elaborate deception, there are several crucial questions I would ask: 

Exactly how many people were on Flight 93? 

Did Flight 93 really land in Cleveland on 9-11 and were passengers from other flights put onto the flight before it was shot down? 

Is this what really happened to the passengers of Flights 11 and 175?

Why was Wally Miller, the Somerset County Coroner, forced to turn over the "crash" site to the FBI?  Why did he abdicate his responsibility for the site and the recovery of the bodies, his obligation under state law?  Why was he not even allowed to be involved in the identification of the remains of the passengers of Flight 93, whose death certificates he duly signed?

The evidence certainly indicates that something extremely ugly happened over Shanksville on 9-11 and the evidence of the atrocity was strewn about the woods surrounding the Hoover property.  There was only one small survivor from the catastrophe that occurred at Barry Hoover's cottage on 9-11.  Woody, Barry Hoover's cat, survived and is still living, eight years later. 

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said Flight 93 had been shot down.

In 2005, I interviewed Viola Saylor of Lambertsville who had seen an aircraft that looked like an A-10 Thunderbolt over Shanksville on 9-11. The following eyewitness accounts of seeing a Thunderbolt are from my article of July 15, 2005, “Eyewitnesses Saw Military Aircraft at Scene of Flight 93”.

Viola Saylor saw Flight 93 pass very low over her house in Lambertsville, which is a mile north of the official crash site. She was in her backyard when she heard a very loud noise and looked up to find herself "nose to nose" with Flight 93, which she says was flying "upside down" as it passed overhead. It was blue and silver, she said, and glistened in the sunlight.

It was so low that it rustled the leaves of her 100-foot maple tree in her yard. It flew southeastwards for about three more seconds and even gained elevation before it crashed over the hill with a "thud," she said. "It was real still for a second," she said. "Then all of a sudden" she saw a "very quiet" and low-flying white "military" plane coming from the area of the crash site, flying towards the northwest. "It was flying very fast, like it was trying to get out of here," she said. "A second or two" behind the "military" plane were two other planes, which Saylor described as "normal" planes.

Shown a photograph of a Fairchild A-10 Thunderbolt II, a low-flying combat aircraft commonly referred to as a "Warthog," Saylor identified it as the military plane she had seen. She said she recognized the two engines on the rear and the distinctive shape of the cockpit and nose of the plane. Similar eyewitness reports of military planes over Shanksville on 9-11 remain censored by the U.S. corporate media, although they were reported in two leading British newspapers.

Several eyewitnesses reported seeing an A-10 Thunderbolt circling the area - before and after - the "crash" of Flight 93.

Susan Mcelwain, a local teacher, also reported seeing a white "military" plane at the scene of the crash before witnessing an explosion. Mcelwain told the Daily Mirror (U.K.) what she saw: 

It came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50 feet above my mini-van," she recalled. "It was so low I ducked instinctively. It was traveling real fast, but hardly made any sound.
Then it disappeared behind some trees. A few seconds later I heard this great explosion and saw this fireball rise up over the trees, so I figured the jet had crashed. The ground really shook. So I dialed 911 and told them what happened.
I'd heard nothing about the other attacks and it was only when I got home and saw the TV that I realized it wasn't the white jet, but Flight 93.
I didn't think much more about it until the authorities started to say there had been no other plane. The plane I saw was heading right to the point where Flight 93 crashed and must have been there at the very moment it came down.
There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look.
The plane Mcelwain describes sounds like the Warthog seen by Saylor over Lambertsville. "It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side," Mcelwain said. "I haven't found one like it on the Internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around. Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3,000 feet up. But I saw it and it was there before the crash and it was 40 feet above my head. They did not want my story - nobody here did." 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93", May 12, 2006 

Bollyn, Christopher, “Eyewitnesses Saw Military Aircraft at Scene of Flight 93”, July 15, 2005

©2024 Christopher Bollyn | Sitemap | christopher at bollyn dot com