Print Contact Articles by Subject 9-11 Archive 2011 The 9/11 Deception and the Death of Bin Laden

The 9/11 Deception and the Death of Bin Laden

May 2, 2011

Tonight, I can report to the American people and to the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama Bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, and a terrorist who's responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children....on nights like this one, we can say to those families who have lost loved ones to al Qaeda's terror:  Justice has been done.
- U.S. President Barack Obama on Osama Bin Laden, 1 May 2011

The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done.
- George W. Bush

Osama Bin Laden was responsible for the worst terrorist atrocities the world has seen - for 9/11 and for so many attacks, which have cost thousands of lives...Of course, nothing will bring back those loved ones that families have lost to terror.  But at least they know the man who was responsible for these appalling acts is no more.
- Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron

On Sunday night, the U.S. president announced that Osama Bin Laden had been killed in a U.S. military raid in Pakistan.  President Obama repeated his claim that Bin Laden was behind 9/11, saying, "We quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda - an organization headed by Osama Bin Laden...and so we went to war against al Qaeda to protect our citizens, our friends, and our allies."


While presidents Obama and Bush both said the extra-judicial killing meant "justice" had been done, their sense of justice is very odd.  After nearly 10 years, there has not been a single trial for any of the families of 9/11 to determine who is responsible for their loss.  Nor have any of the alleged terrorists behind 9/11 been tried in open courts although they have been held for nearly a decade in Guantanamo, which is where Obama says they will be tried in Soviet-style closed military tribunals.  The justice that Obama and Bush are bragging about is a gross perversion of American justice because it means condemning a person and taking their life without due process.

After supposedly having killed Bin Laden, the man behind 9/11 (along with alleged "Mastermind of 9/11", Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is held in Guantanamo) the U.S. military then quickly dropped his body in the sea.  How much sense does that make?  Why would the U.S. want to dump the body and destroy the evidence that they had really killed Osama Bin Laden?  Dumping the body of a murder victim in the ocean is what the Mafia does with its victims to hide the evidence.  This is not how a law-abiding nation should act.  This is most unusual and raises obvious questions about who was really killed.  "After 10 years of searching for Al Qaeda mastermind Osama bin Laden, why would President Obama announce that the terror-master has been killed in a firefight with American special forces, announce that we have the body, and then DUMP THE BODY IN THE OCEAN two hours later, before anyone can see the body and verify it?" asks Jane Jamison in her article "Where is Osama bin Laden’s Body?"

The British Prime Minister David Cameron repeated the unproven claim of Bush and Obama that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11, adding that "the man who was responsible for these appalling acts is no more."  But was Bin Laden really responsible for the 9/11 attacks and the demolitions that killed 3,000 people?  There is actually no evidence that proves that Bin Laden was behind the attacks and a great deal indicating that 9/11 was a sophisticated conspiracy involving the intelligence agency of a state.

While U.S. and British political leaders claim that Bin Laden was behind 9/11, that's not what the FBI's Most Wanted poster says about him.  It does not even mention that he is suspected of being involved in 9/11.  Why would our political leaders claim that Bin Laden was behind 9/11 if their Federal Bureau of Investigation, who collected all of the evidence from the crime scenes, does not? 

On 8 May 2002, nine months after the attacks, Robert S. Mueller, the director of the FBI, told the Senate Committee on the Judiciary:  "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot." 

The FBI is the principal investigative arm of the U.S. Department of Justice and has special investigative jurisdiction in cases of terrorism.  The FBI, an agency under the criminal division of the department (then headed by Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff, the Israeli son of the Mossad agent Livia Eisen), oversaw the investigation of 9/11. “Investigation is what we do," the bureau says on its website, "gathering facts and evidence to solve and prevent crimes."

Although the FBI supposedly collected the evidence from the 9/11 crime scenes, it has never presented any evidence that would prove that Osama Bin Laden and al Qaeda carried out the attacks.  Nor has the FBI presented any evidence that would identify the aircraft that crashed into the buildings on 9/11.  If the government had real evidence that would conclusively prove its case for waging war in Afghanistan, why has it not presented the evidence in a federal court after 10 years?

A proper criminal investigation has to proceed from the evidence. Any inquiry that does not examine all the evidence is not an investigation, but a fraud.  This is what happened at the World Trade Center crime scene, where the FBI allowed men working for Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York City, to take control of the crucial steel evidence that could have proven exactly what had caused the explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers.  The structural steel was hastily destroyed before it could be examined by experts.  Why would the FBI, whose obligation it is to gather all the evidence, allow the most critical evidence from the crime scene to be destroyed without being examined?

Dust and steel were all that remained after the explosive demolitions that destroyed the Twin Towers -- and the 2,752 people inside of them. "The concrete was literally pulverized; all you're left with is steel and dust," Robert A. Kelman, the man who managed the destruction of most of the steel said.  Kelman was general manager of Hugo Neu, the company who managed the destruction of 250,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center by sending it to Asian smelters, far from the prying eyes of 9/11 investigators.

The FBI allowed the steel from the World Trade Center to be destroyed because it was solid evidence that would have exposed who and what had actually caused the murderous demolition of the Twin Towers.  The destruction of this crucial evidence was an intrinsic part of the crime of 9/11 and the people who allowed it to happen are part of the criminal gang behind the terrorism.

If the attacks were truly carried out by Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida there would be no reason to hide any of the evidence because it should serve to corroborate and confirm the official version. If, on the other hand, 9/11 was a false-flag terror deception it would be absolutely imperative for the perpetrators to confiscate and destroy any evidence that could disprove their interpretation of events. 

Author's note:  The destruction of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center is the subject of my forthcoming article, which will be the final chapter of my book, Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World 

©2021 Christopher Bollyn | Sitemap | christopher at bollyn dot com