Why the New York Times is Anti-American
January 9, 2013
"My conclusion is simple. Nepotism works."
- Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, (1926 -2012), publisher of the New York Times, “a tightly held family operation since 1896.”
“In the three years since 9-11, we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.”
- New York Times, "The Public Knowledge of 9/11," September 11, 2004
On December 30, 2012, the New York Times published a disturbing anti-American editorial entitled “Let’s Give Up on the Constitution,” written by Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University. As it was surely intended to do, the editorial caused a great deal of consternation among patriotic Americans.
Louis Michael Seidman, a scion of the B'nai B'rith, penned the editorial trashing the U.S. Constitution.
Seidman’s piece claims that “obedience to the Constitution” with its “downright evil provisions” is responsible for the “broken” American system of government:
As the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.
It is, however, not obedience but disobedience to the Constitution, exactly like that promoted by Seidman, that is behind the “broken” state of our system of government. The most egregious examples of this Constitutional disobedience are the continuous violations of Article I, Section 8, in which the powers of Congress are specified:
The Congress shall have Power…
To coin money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin… and
To declare War…
For the past century Congress has completely abdicated its power to coin money by allowing U.S. currency to be issued by a cartel of privately-owned banks known as the Federal Reserve System. Secondly, the U.S. has waged numerous wars around the world during the past 65 years not one of which was declared by Congress. These two blatant violations of the Constitution are responsible for most of the financial problems currently faced by the U.S. government.
A constitution is a body of fundamental principles according to which a state is governed. To say we should “give up on the Constitution” is to say we should give up on the American system of government. For alternatives to the American system, Seidman points to nations like Britain and New Zealand, nations which have no constitution. The revolutionary difference of the American system is that in the United States the people are sovereign while in Britain and New Zealand it is the Queen of England who is sovereign. The American Revolution was fought over that difference.
The revolutionary concept of American popular sovereignty is contained in the first three words of the Constitution: We The People. As Benjamin Franklin said, "In free governments, the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and sovereigns."
The revolutionary concept of popular sovereignty is enshrined in the first three words of the Constitution.
So why would the New York Times publish an anti-American editorial that calls for giving up the Constitution and the system of government it provides? To understand this we need to understand what the New York Times is, and who it really represents.
The editor of the editorial page of the New York Times is Andrew Rosenthal, who oversees the paper's opinion pages. The editorial department of the paper is completely separate from the news operations and Mr. Rosenthal answers directly to the publisher, Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr.
The New York Times is a family-owned newspaper, controlled by the Sulzberger family. The paper is owned by The New York Times Company, which publishes 18 other newspapers, including theInternational Herald Tribune and The Boston Globe. Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. is the chairman of the company and his family has controlled the paper since 1896.
The Sulzberger family is a Jewish family from Baden, in southern Germany. The Sulzbergers are closely tied to the Rothschild family, which comes from the same part of Germany. Ferdinand Sulzberger, for example, was the first of the Sulzbergers from Baden to immigrate to America. Before coming to America, Sulzberger studied business in a mercantile firm in Frankfurt, the home of the Rothschild family. He probably worked with the Rothschilds. Subsequently, after making a fortune in America with his meat packing business, Sulzberger’s daughter Lily married Victor Sydney Rothschild, the eldest son of Victor Henry Rothschild. The two fathers served on the board of trustees of Temple Beth-El on Fifth Avenue in New York City.
One of the most significant connections between the Sulzberger and Rothschild families is that they both belong to the leadership level of the Jewish Zionist secret society known as the International Order of B’nai B’rith. Louis Michael Seidman’s grandfather was a president of the Victory Lodge 1481 of B’nai B’rith. The younger generations of these families are surely members of the same secret society – but keep it secret.
The Sulzberger and Rothschild families have long conspired together to change the world to suit their agenda. Some of their global plans have been published in the pages of the New York Times, which has served as their media megaphone for the past century. In 1907, for example, the paper carried an article entitled “Will People the West with the Russian Jews.”
The Sulzberger and Rothschild families work together to advance their global agenda. Their project in 1907 to populate the American West with Russian Jews is just one example.
In the article, Cyrus L. Sulzberger (of the family that controls the NYT) announced that he was heading a project to bring large numbers of Russian Jews directly to Galveston, Texas. The project to populate the American West with Russian Jews was funded by Jacob H. Schiff and the Rothschild family. It is interesting to note that the emigration project was not a U.S. government initiative but was first conceived and announced in London, where the treasurer for the operation was Leopold de Rothschild. The B’nai B’rith and these same Zionist families had operated similar Jewish emigration programs in Eastern Europe for decades.
Understanding that the Sulzberger family controlling the New York Times is closely connected to the Rothschilds, the leading family of British Zionists, may help explain why they published the Seidman piece trashing the U.S. Constitution. This connection also explains why the New York Times published an editorial on the third anniversary of 9-11, which said, “…we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened.”
The New York Times, which should have conducted its own investigation, actually played a key role in the cover-up of the truth of 9-11. Three years later the paper told its readers that they did not need to know what happened on 9-11. Why would the leading newspaper in the city in which 3,000 people were killed on 9-11 say such a thing?
The Sulzberger-owned paper published that editorial for the same reason it published the propaganda pieces by Judith Miller, whichfalsely claimed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction: to advance the rapacious agenda of the Rothschild family and their Zionist state of Israel.
The state of Israel serves as the operational arm and iron fist of the British Zionist movement, which is headed by the Rothschild family. The Balfour Declaration in 1917, for example, which first promised Britain’s support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people,” was addressed to Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild, after all.
For the Sulzberger and Rothschild families the United States is a nation they seek to control and dominate. The terrorism of 9-11 was a false-flag operation that they sponsored and controlled through their strategic asset, the state of Israel. The Zionist-controlled media was then deployed to deceive the public about what really happened. The strategic goal was to change American public opinion and bring the U.S. military into the Middle East to seize valuable assets and protect their beleaguered Zionist state. Undermining the United States by attacking the U.S. Constitution is simply part of their agenda. Understanding who is behind this evil agenda is essential to stopping it.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
“Let’s Give Up on the Constitution,” by Louis Michael Seidman, New York Times, December 30, 2012
Sulzberger, Jewish Encyclopedia (1906)
“Will People the West with the Russian Jews,” New York Times, January 5, 1907