Print Contact Articles by Subject 9-11 Archive 2011

The FBI's Fake Terror Plots and 9-11

Updated December 5, 2011

"Justice is incidental to law and order." 
- J. Edgar Hoover, founding director of the FBI from 1935 to 1972 

The fundamental human desire for justice motivates and unites the Occupy Wall Street movement... 

... a widespread and popular response to gross economic, social, and political injustices perpetrated by an entrenched criminal regime.

The Occupy Wall Street protests that have swept the United States since September 2011 are the result of the growing public awareness of grossly unjust government policies.  With protesters enraged by a range of issues from the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to the trillion dollar bail-out of criminal bankers, the Occupy Wall Street protests are evidence that the American public outrage against the corrupt regime in Washington, D.C. is deep and widespread.

The criminal regime that has taken over the U.S. government has done so over time, gradually increasing its control.  For the criminal organization to take control of the government it was first required that they gain control over the agency that investigates and prosecutes criminal activity at the federal level.  This is the U.S. Department of Justice, which includes the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).  The FBI is the agency of the Department of Justice that serves as both a federal criminal investigative body and an internal intelligence agency.  The FBI is specifically authorized to investigate terrorism crimes such as the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the first bombing of the World Trade Center on 26 February 1993.  The FBI has changed a great deal since 9/11 and the days when it was the nation's leading crime-fighting organization.  Currently, the FBI's two top priorities are to protect the United States from terrorist attacks and against foreign intelligence operations and espionage.

While the FBI is the federal agency that is supposed to protect the U.S. from crimes of terrorism and to investigate such crimes when they occur, in reality the FBI plays quite a different role.  For at least two decades, the FBI has actually been involved in creating and causing crimes of fake terrorism.  In the early 1990s, for example, it was revealed that the FBI was deeply involved in the first false-flag terror bombing of the World Trade Center in February 1993.  This bombing was evidently an FBI/Mossad operation that was meant to be interpreted as an act of Muslim terrorism in order to prime the pump of public opinion and impress upon the American public the false notion that Arab terrorists were seeking to destroy the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center.

Eight years later, when the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 destroyed the Twin Towers, the FBI, under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff of the Criminal Division, utterly failed in its mission to investigate the crime by allowing the crucial steel from the World Trade Center and other evidence to be hastily removed and destroyed before it could be examined by forensic experts.  This was clearly a criminal act to destroy the evidence to protect the guilty.  Controlling the "non-investigation" and all access to the evidence are two essential requirements necessary to foist a false interpretation of an act of terrorism upon the public.  As the highest federal official responsible for prosecuting the crimes of terrorism, Michale Chertoff allowed the most crucial evidence to be destroyed in order to protect the real culprits.  With such a record of complicity, incompetence, and of having actually created numerous fake plots of terrorism, it is clearly Michael Chertoff, the FBI, and the Department of Justice that need to be investigated if we are to end the fraudulent nightmare known as the "War on Terror". 

U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft (right) and Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff of the Criminal Division during a news conference at the Department of Justice in February 2003. Chertoff told the author that he does not know who authorized the destruction of the crucial evidence from the World Trade Center although the FBI, under his command, led the 9/11 investigation.

(Latin - "Who watches the guards?")   

"The target, the motive, the ideology and the plot were all led by the FBI." 
- Karen Greenberg, a law professor who studies FBI tactics, on the Newburgh Four "terror plot".

"The fact that it was all fake really doesn't matter." 
- David Raskin, lead prosecutor of Newburgh Four

"Ahmad Ajaj, a 27-year-old West Bank Palestinian being held in federal custody for conspiring to bomb the World Trade Center, may have been a Mossad mole, according to Israeli intelligence sources."
- "Mossad Linked To WTC Bomb Suspect", Village Voice, 3 August 1993

"...we was start already building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the DA and we was all informed about it and we know that the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful great case!" 
-FBI Informant Emad Salem to FBI Special Agent John Anticev

Alicia McWilliams-McCollum, aunt of David Williams IV, holds a photograph of FBI informant Shahed Hussain during a rally in Newburgh, NY. 

FBI Special Agent Robert Fuller was the direct supervisor of Shahed Hussain, the FBI informant who was the government's main witness against the Newburgh Four.

It should be noted that the mainstream media has reported about the FBI's role in numerous acts of fake terror going back at least as far as the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, which killed 6 and injured more than 1,000.  Given the bureau's long record of involvement in fake terror plots and its role in the criminal destruction of crucial evidence from 9/11, it is quite clear that the FBI must be investigated by an outside agency.

The Guardian newspaper of Britain recently published 
an article, as part of a series of articles about the FBI practice of creating fake terror plots using paid informants.  This latest article is about the Newburgh Four, a group of four black men with criminal records who were entrapped by an FBI informant in a fake terror plot to bomb a Jewish synagogue in the Bronx:

So it was perhaps no surprise that in May, 2009, David Williams was arrested again and hit with a 25-year jail sentence. But it was not for drugs offences. Or any other common crime. Instead Williams and three other struggling local men beset by drug, criminal and mental health issues were convicted of an Islamic terrorist plot to blow up Jewish synagogues and shoot down military jets with missiles.

Even more shocking was that the organisation, money, weapons and motivation for this plot did not come from real Islamic terrorists. It came from the FBI, and an informant paid to pose as a terrorist mastermind paying big bucks for help in carrying out an attack. For McWilliams, her own government had actually cajoled and paid her beloved nephew into being a terrorist, created a fake plot and then jailed him for it. "I feel like I am in the Twilight Zone," she told the Guardian.

The FBI's practice of creating fake terror plots using paid informants was first revealed by Emad Salem, the Egyptian intelligence agent who was paid $1 million to serve as an FBI informant during the first bombing of the World Trade Center.  As Salem revealed by secretly taping his conversations with FBI agents, the bureau was involved in creating the bomb and could have prevented the explosion at the World Trade Center - if it had wanted to.  The FBI decision to allow the 1993 WTC bombing to go ahead indicates that people at the FBI were involved in the terrorism plot that resulted in 9/11.  The transcripts that revealed the FBI's involvement in the first bombing were published in the New York Times and Village Voice at the time and even reported by Dan Rather on the CBS nightly news in October 1993.

Video Link -

The following video is an extract from the taped phone conversation between FBI paid informant Emad Salem and FBI Special Agent John Anticev in which Salem discusses that the FBI supervised the construction of the bomb:

Video Link -

Michael Chertoff, the Israeli-American dual national and son of the Mossad who supervised the FBI's destruction of evidence from the 9/11 terror attacks, was involved in the first bombing of the World Trade Center as the U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, where the key evidence used in the prosecution was found.  While Janet Reno, the new U.S. Attorney General under President Bill Clinton, called for the resignations of all the U.S. Attorneys at the end of March 1993, a peculiar exception was made for Michael Chertoff, who was asked to stay in his position in New Jersey until the end of 1993.  Chertoff was kept on in his position in order to manage the investigation and prosecution, just as he did after the 9/11 attacks.  It should be noted that the acting Attorney General at the time of the bombing was Stuart Michael Gerson, who was replaced by Janet Reno on 19 March 1993.  Gerson is currently a member of the law firm of Epstein, Becker and Green. 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Blumenthal, Ralph, "Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast", New York Times, 28 October 1993

Bollyn, Christopher, "The Destruction of the Evidence", Chapter 15 of Solving 9/11, 19 May 2011

Bollyn, Hugo Neu and the Giuliani Partners Who Destroyed the Steel of 9/11, 18 April 2011

Bollyn, "Making Sense of the 9/11 Cover Up", Chapter 16 of Solving 9/11, 19 May 2011

Bollyn, "The Israeli Connection to 9-11", 8 April 2005

Briley, Patrick, "Chertoff Created Terror Pretexts for US Police State", 21 February 2005 

"Chertoff Covers Up 1993 WTC Bombing Conspiracy",,

"Chertoff Is Staying On as U.S. Attorney", New York Times, 1 April 1993

Fried, Joseph P. "Muslim Cleric Was Framed By Top Informer, Defense Says", New York Times, 8 September 1995

Friedman, Robert I. "Mossad Linked To WTC Bomb Suspect", Village Voice, 3 August 1993

Greenberg, Karen, "The FBI's synagogue bomb plot", The Guardian (UK), 30 June 2011

Harris, Paul, "Fake terror plots, paid informants: the tactics of FBI 'entrapment' questioned", The Guardian (UK), 16 November 2011

Harris, Paul, "FBI faces entrapment questions over Rezwan Ferdaus bomb plot", The Guardian, 29 September 2011

Hopsicker, Daniel, "Did Bush's New Homeland Chief Shield Terror Ring in New Jersey?", Mad Cow Morning News, 12 January 2005

Rayman, Graham, "Were the Newburgh 4 Really Out to Blow Up Synagogues?", Village Voice, 2 March 2011 

"Zionists Behind 1993 WTC Bombing - An Exercise in Muslim Patsyism",, 28 May 2011

Village Voice
, "Newburgh 4: FBI Fantasy or Terrorist Takedown"

"Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed", by Paul DeRienzo, Frank Morales and Chris Flash, The_Shadow, Oct. 1994/Jan. 1995  

Solving 9/11 to End the Zionist War Plan for Iran

November 8, 2011

That's the game. Burn the place down for the insurance. They're just fixing the flames to reach the lobby building, sprinkling thermite dust along the covered way... They've used thermite bombs in each of the cabins. Better than petrol. Less bulky and they leave no traces for the insurance sleuths.
- James Bond in The Spy Who Loved Me by Ian Fleming, 1962

'Do you really think that criminals are clever, good people, Thrasymachus?'
'Yes, if their criminality is able to manifest in a perfect form and they are capable of dominating countries and nations.'
- Plato's Republic, ca. 380 B.C.

Ultimately this is a fight over the Israeli nuclear monopoly in the region.
-Avner Cohen, Expert on Israel's nuclear arsenal, The Guardian, 7 November 2011

There are two essential requirements to prevent a third World War in our time and to end the crimocracy that dominates Washington, D.C., London, and Jerusalem.  First, there must be an independent, rigorous, and thorough forensic investigation of 9/11, followed by criminal prosecution of all those involved in the terror atrocity - and the cover-up.  Secondly, there must be a return to hand-counted paper ballots in every polling place in the United States.  These two essential demands should be at the top of the anti-war protest movement's list of demands if the American people are to succeed in removing the criminal regime that controls the U.S. government.  The same criminal network that is behind 9/11 is now planning to drag the nation into war with Iran - and possibly World War III.

I have used the word "crimocracy" since late 2000 to describe the U.S. government after having discovered how electronic voting machines were being used in Chicago's Cook County to steal the election.  After receiving a thinly-veiled threat from Alex Kantarovich, the man from Minsk, Byelorussia, who provided the control cards for the voting machines, if I went ahead with my Election Day story, there was no question that the people behind ES&S were organized criminals.  Visits to the Chicago and Omaha offices of ES&S only confirmed to me that this was a very secretive criminal outfit that was engaged in rigging elections across the United States.  The democratic franchise in America was meaningless. 

Christopher Bollyn (back to camera) interviewing the CFO of Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Mr. Tom O'Brien, in August 2004 at the company's Omaha headquarters on John Galt Blvd. The CEO was unavailable for comment and the company that counts millions of American votes was unable to answer any questions or provide any press releases or information about itself.

Criminals run electronic voting companies for only one reason - to steal elections.  By using computerized voting machines the public is cheated out of its right to observe the counting of the ballots, the fundamental sine qua non of a verifiable democratic election.  By pulling the wool over the eyes of the American people the criminals have been able to put criminals into positions of power.  This is how the U.S. government has become a crimocracy, a government of criminals, led by people (e.g. the Clintons, the Bushes and Obama) who openly engage in criminal activities, such as illegal wars of aggression and targeted killings using drones around the world. 

With the world on the brink of war with Iran, it is high time and absolutely essential for the American protest movement to articulate these two fundamental demands.  These demands are necessary if we are to expose the Zionist crimocracy behind 9/11 and remove its members from all positions of power.

TROIKA OF TERROR - Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak, President Shimon Peres, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are pulling the United States into war with Iran.  These three men are architectural level planners of the 9/11 terror deception; they are Israel's "Troika of Terror". 

What needs to be understood is that 9/11 has not been properly investigated as a crime by forensic experts.  As I have pointed out in numerous articles about the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center, the federal agency that should have led the investigation, the F.B.I., allowed the crucial evidence to be hastily removed and destroyed in Asian smelters.  This is clearly criminal and shows how the U.S. Department of Justice and the F.B.I. have become completely corrupt. 

The Obama administration has only continued the 9/11 cover up while increasing the war effort and targeted killings in Afghanistan and Pakistan, crimes in and of themselves.  Regardless of our political views, we can certainly all agree that 9/11 must be properly and rigorously investigated and the guilty parties prosecuted and punished.  9/11 was used to usher in the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" and two illegal wars of occupation in Afghanistan and Iraq - on both sides of Iran.

The 9/11 investigation was hijacked by then Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff, the Israeli-American dual national who was responsible for the federal investigation and prosecution of the terror attacks, because a proper criminal investigation would have revealed that 9/11 was a false-flag terror atrocity carried out and covered-up by Israeli military intelligence and their "Fifth Column" (i.e. Zionist agents) in the United States.  The attacks were designed to be blamed on Arab Muslims (i.e. "false-flag") in order to get U.S. public opinion to support an open-ended war in the Islamic lands of the Middle East. 

The U.S. invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq are the realization of the "War on Terror", a Zionist war strategy pushed by Benjamin Netanyahu since the 1980s in books, speeches, and articles.  Like a chess game in which Iran is the ultimate target, the first move in the Zionist war plan was to bring U.S. forces into Afghanistan on the East, and then into Iraq on the West.  The massive U.S. military presence in the Persian Gulf on the South means Iran is surrounded on three sides.  A U.S. war against Iran is the end game of the terror masterminds behind 9/11.  

The Zionist warmongers plan for American and British troops to invade Iran.  The Zionist-controlled governments in Washington and London are not acting in the best interest of their nations.  The people must stop the criminals from waging another Zionist war.  Graphic - Daily Mail

The three highest political leaders of Israel are leading the effort to drag the United States into war with Iran:  Defense Minister Ehud Barak, President Shimon Peres, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.  All three are architectural level planners of the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.  Barak was the first person, on 9/11, to call for the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.  On the day of the attacks, Netanyahu told the New York Times that the terror atrocity was "very good" for U.S.-Israel relations.  Barak was Netanyahu's commander in the Israeli special forces unit known as Sayeret Matkal.  Israeli president Shimon Peres is the third partner in this troika of Zionist terrorists.  "The possibility of a military attack against Iran is now closer to being applied than the application of a diplomatic option," Peres recently told the Israel Hayom newspaper.

We must do everything we can to prevent the Zionist warmongers from waging war against Iran.  Demanding a criminal investigation of 9/11 is where we should start.  It is the failure to investigate 9/11 which has allowed the criminals in high places to wage illegal wars and plunder our national wealth.  This simply cannot be allowed to continue.

*   *   *   *   *

The following video by Jon Cole, "9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert", illustrates how the government has lied about what really happened to the Twin Towers - since Day One.

Video Link -

The following video discusses the agenda behind the threat of war against Iran.

Video Link -

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Death of Democracy Or May the Best Hacker Win", 27 October 2000 

Bollyn, "Restoring Democracy in America", March 19, 2011

Bollyn, "On Fictional Elections", January 3, 2008

Bollyn, "The 9/11 Cover Up - The Destruction of the Steel Evidence", May 2011

Borger, Julian, "Iran nuclear report: IAEA claims Tehran working on advanced warhead",, 7 November 2011

Drury, Ian, "UK and U.S. 'draw up joint plan to attack Iran': Evidence of nuclear programme raises tension in Middle East", Daily Mail (UK), 2 November 2011

Eldar, Akiva, "Obama must stop Netanyahu, Barak from attacking Iran", Haaretz (Israel), 7 November 2011

"UK, US, Israel threaten War on Iran - Interview on RT", 4 November 2011

"9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert", by Jon Cole, 1 November 2011

The Israeli Truck Bombs of 9/11 - Video

November 15, 2011

The Jerusalem Post report of the Israeli truck bombers of 9/11.

The following short video focuses on the dancing Israelis and their fellow truck bombers who were caught by police on 11 September 2001. This video makes the case that the Israeli agents working at the Mossad front company known as Urban Moving Systems were involved in the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11.

Video Link - 9/11 Whodunnitt? You Decide

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Official FBI & Police Reports of Israelis Arrested on 9/11",, 26 August 2011

9/11 Masterminds - Explosive Connections

October 11, 2011

The following video provides information on many of the 9/11 "insiders" and the companies and agencies in the impact zones of the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Although it does not mention the word Zionist or Israel, it does point out some of the key players at the operational level of the conspiracy, e.g. Jerry Bremer. I wouldn't call any of these people "masterminds of 9/11". Oddly, although it mentions that Kroll was involved in the security at the World Trade Center on 9/11 it doesn't draw the link between Kroll, Marsh, and Maurice Greenberg. For those important details one would have to read my chapter on the Architecture of Terrorism.

Video URL:

Justice Denied - Last 9/11 Family Settles Out of Court

Updated September 27, 2011

Thanks to the obstruction of justice and judicial hijacking of the 9/11 tort litigation by a Zionist judge named Alvin K. Hellerstein, there will be no trial to find the truth of what really happened on 9/11 or to determine who is responsible for the airport security lapses that led to the loss of 3,000 lives. While I certainly get no satisfaction from this travesty of justice, this is exactly the outcome I had predicted, which indicates that my analysis of the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 is accurate:

When all is said and done it will probably not be the Zionist judge who is removed from the process, but the suffering plaintiffs, the Israeli defendants and all the incriminating evidence, because in the end there will probably never be a trial to find those responsible for the crime of the century, at least not as long as Judge Hellerstein is making the decisions.
- Christopher Bollyn, "Elbit - The Hellerstein Connection to 9-11", 3 August 2009

He [U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein] essentially gutted the case so that the truth about what led to the events of Sept. 11, 2001, would never be told at trial.
- Bavis Family letter, 21 September 2011

If the Israeli agent Hellerstein is able to obstruct justice by blocking a trial he will succeed in closing the book on the sordid Zionist saga of 9/11 without a single case going to trial. If that were to happen, it would be a huge travesty of justice and we would all lose - and the real terrorists of 9/11 would win.
- Christopher Bollyn, "9/11 Litigation Update: Justice Denied - One Case Left", 11 August 2010

DO WE LOOK GUILTY? Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and wife Sara visit the Israeli-designed 9/11 memorial in New York City with Mayor Bloomberg on 23 September 2011. On 9/11, Netanyahu told the New York Times that the terror attacks that were then thought to have killed tens of thousands were "VERY GOOD" for U.S.-Israeli relations. His Likudnik partner in crime, Ehud Olmert, then mayor of Jerusalem, was actually in New York City on a visit on 9/11, a visit which has been kept secret for 10 years by mayors Bloomberg and Giuliani. Why has Olmert's visit been kept secret if he was not involved in the crime? Remember, there is no statute of limitations on murder.

Michael Arad, the designer of the memorial, is the son of Israeli Ambassador Moshe Arad (photo), a director of Elbit and a close friend of the Netanyahu family. Elbit Systems (of Israel) entered the U.S. market in the early 1990s when it created a wholly-owned subsidiary, EFW or Elbit Systems of America (formerly General Dynamics electronics production facility in Fort Worth, Texas). Elbit sells a system known as its Advanced C4I Solutions, which enables command and control functions over highly complex training scenarios, including thousands of participating entities (both virtual and real). Elbit sold more than $560 million worth of its systems to the U.S. military in the decade 2000-2009. These are the systems used by the U.S. Air Force and NORAD that failed on 9/11.

It was murder. We will never get over it. We are fighting for the truth... I hope there are people out there who want the truth.
- Mary Bavis, mother of 9/11 victim Mark Bavis, to Christopher Bollyn

This bastard judicial system is so corrupt.
- 9/11 widow Ellen Mariani

The last 9/11 family has given up their hope of obtaining the truth about 9/11 through litigation. The family of Mark Bavis has been forced to settle out of court, saying in a public letter dated September 21, 2011 (copied below) that the Zionist U.S. Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein had "essentially gutted" their case:

With the stroke of his pen, Judge Hellerstein very cleverly changed this lawsuit. The lawsuit was about wrongful death, gross negligence and a complete lack of appreciation for the value of human life. He instead made it a case about a federal regulation. He ignored 100 years of aviation law and relied on an environmental case to apply federal preemption. He essentially gutted the case so that the truth about what led to the events of Sept. 11, 2001, would never be told at trial.

U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein played a key role in the 9/11 cover-up by blocking legal discovery and preventing a trial from occurring. His mission, as a Zionist agent, was to manage the judicial cover-up of 9/11 in order to protect the real culprits.

Alvin K. Hellerstein is the corrupt Zionist judge who single-handedly managed the legal process in which the 9/11 relatives were denied justice through the courts. As a Zionist agent, Hellerstein obstructed justice for the 9/11 victims by blocking a trial from occurring. Under Judge Hellerstein the 9/11 tort litigation process has been an appalling travesty of justice. The judge's son Joseph is an Israeli settler/lawyer who works with the law firm that represents the parent company of ICTS - the key Israeli defendant in the 9/11 tort litigation. Although this presented a clear and serious conflict of interest for Hellerstein, the lawyers and the Zionist-controlled media ignored it as the 9/11 relatives fell away in a judicial war of attrition.

This means that the last 9/11 wrongful death case has been settled out of court and that there will be NO trial to determine who is responsible for the death of some 3,000 people on 9/11. This is to say that the real terrorists behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 have gotten away with murder - mass murder.

Here is the brief Associated Press report about this outrageous travesty of justice:

Boston (AP) -- The family fighting the last remaining wrongful death lawsuit against the airlines from the Sept. 11 attacks says it settled because the judge "essentially gutted" their case.

Mark Bavis was a hockey scout for the Los Angeles Kings who was on his way to training camp on United Flight 175 when it was hijacked and flown into the south tower of the World Trade Center.

The family has said it wanted to use the lawsuit to expose the airlines' security failures and force them to take responsibility for their role in the attacks. But in a public letter issued on Wednesday, the Bavises say decisions by U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein guaranteed that "the truth about what led to the events of Sept. 11, 2001, would never be told at trial."

The following is a public letter from the Bavis family dated 21 September 2011:

After ten long years, our family has had a change in position regarding the litigation on behalf of our son and brother, Mark. Mark was a passenger aboard United Airlines Flight 175 when it crashed into the World Trade Center. This change is the result of a recent ruling by the Honorable Judge Alvin Hellerstein. With the stroke of his pen, Judge Hellerstein very cleverly changed this lawsuit. The lawsuit was about wrongful death, gross negligence and a complete lack of appreciation for the value of human life. He instead made it a case about a federal regulation. He ignored 100 years of aviation law and relied on an environmental case to apply federal preemption. He essentially gutted the case so that the truth about what led to the events of Sept. 11, 2001, would never be told at trial.

To the families of the 9/11 victims: We can honestly say that our family envisioned a day when you could hear all the evidence, evidence that would provide an important step in moving beyond the events of that day. This process has taken a toll on us that only you could understand. We fought this long for two reasons, because we valued Mark's life in the time spent together, the shared experiences and the expectation of what life would continue to be. Secondly, the truth as to why this happened so easily should be important. Mark did not have to endure the tragedy that ended his life and neither did your loved ones.

Due to our family's refusal to settle before this time, our attorneys at Motley Rice LLC have been able to conduct the most comprehensive investigation to date regarding how the airlines and airport security companies failed so miserably on 9/11 and in the days, weeks and months leading up to 9/11. Motley Rice's attorneys have recovered ten times more information than the 9/11 Commission in regards to the failure of the aviation industry.

Why? Because we, and other 9/11 families, wanted answers. We want that information to be available to whoever cares to read it. It is important to us that some change comes out of the information held in those briefs. The system is clearly broken when an industry like aviation has enough power to keep a federal agency such as the FAA from implementing more stringent security measures, especially during a heightened terrorism threat level. The tail is wagging the dog, and someone in Washington needs to stand up and start holding people accountable.

It is not out of the question that our country could endure a similar event in the future. Such a tragedy, however, should never again be the result of lack of oversight or preparation or because lobbyists have so much influence and power in Washington, D.C., that American lives are at risk. Our government's job is to protect the people—from foreign armies, terrorists and even our own American corporations. It is time that our elected officials take responsibility for the authority we have given them.

All of the events of September 11, 2001, are open to opinion and discussion, but we believe the easiest way to have prevented the kind of horror and tragedy of 9/11 would have been to have an airline industry that made a reasonable effort to provide security for its passengers. The evidence shows that they most certainly did not.

Lastly, we are thankful to have had a law firm like Motley Rice that was willing to stand by us and fight for the truth. Without them, we would have never learned so much about why this happened. In particular, we want to thank Don Migliori, Mary Schiavo and their entire team.

- Bavis Family

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Judge Hellerstein's Court Order of 7 September 2011

"Litigation in the Name of Mark L. Bavis Comes to an End", PRNewswire-USNewswire, 21 September 2011

English, Bella, “Bavis family settles 9/11 lawsuit”, Boston Globe, 19 September 2011

Bollyn, Christopher, "Judge Hellerstein's Unethical Connection to Key Defendant in 9-11 Lawsuit", 10 May 2010

Bollyn, "The Zionist Hijacking of the 9-11 Victim Lawsuits", 14 April 2006

Bollyn, "The Denial of Justice for 9-11 Victims", 20 March 2007

Bollyn, "Elbit - The Hellerstein Connection to 9-11", 3 August 2009

Bollyn, "9/11 Litigation Update - Justice Denied - One Case Left", 11 August 2010

Bollyn, "Zionist Judge Sets Arbitrary Time Limit on 9/11 Trial", 30 April 2011

Arnon Milchan - "Mr. Israel" and 9/11

October 4, 2011

A plot of this magnitude and audacity could only have been conceived under faultless cover and down to the smallest detail.
- Thunderball, Ian Fleming

In Confidential, a recent biography of Arnon Milchan, Israel's LAKAM agent Number One, the authors reveal that Milchan and Peres are "strategic partners" and "holders of some of Israel's most significant secrets." Chief among these secrets would certainly be how Israeli agents carried out 9/11.

Arnon Milchan, born in Israel in 1944, has led the kind of life that Ian Fleming and John le Carre loved to write about... He's a superagent in the real-world sense, and the closest thing to a real-life James Bond that one could imagine.
- Confidential: The Life of Secret Agent Turned Hollywood Tycoon - Arnon Milchan (2011)

Beyond the whispers and the movies, few people know of Arnon’s role in supplying Israel with its defense needs, and in creating its ultimate deterrence capabilities… For me, he is ‘Mr. Israel.’
- Sumner Redstone, Chairman of the Board, Viacom Inc.

“Tell us about this Israeli movie producer.”
- William F. Fahey, U.S. District Attorney to Richard Kelly Smyth, Milchan’s U.S. supplier of nuclear triggers smuggled to Israel, January 1985

"MR. ISRAEL" - Israel's senior LAKAM agent Arnon Milchan (center) has long been the man bridging Israel's intelligence establishment with each new government. In this photo from 2005, Milchan sits between his old friends Vice Prime Minister Shimon Peres and Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a former employee of Milchan's chemical company, Milchan Bros. Milchan was the essential agent in building Israel's nuclear arsenal. So, what does he know about the Israeli-made super-thermite that demolished the World Trade Center?


If one considers the known evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of 9/11, the Odigo text messages and the five arrested Mossad agents, for example, as indicative of Israeli state involvement in the crime, the identity of the hidden power behind the cover-up is rather obvious. The "hidden hand" suppressing the information about 9/11 would have to be a high-level person in the Israeli political-military intelligence establishment who has very close relations with media kingpins like Murdoch, Levin, and Eisner. Arnon Milchan (a.k.a. Milchen) is such a person.
- Christopher Bollyn, "Arnon Milchan - Mossad's Man in the Middle" from Chapter VIII of Solving 9/11,
"The Mass Media & the 9/11 Cover-Up"

The hypothesis that 9/11 was carried out by Israeli agents requires the presence of a high-level Israeli agent playing the role of "man in the middle" between the architects of false-flag terror and the media moguls who shape public opinion through their control of the largest news and entertainment networks in the United States.

The pilot episode of the The Lone Gunmen television series in which a passenger airliner is remotely hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center was filmed in 2000 and aired on television six months before 9/11, on Fox TV in March 2001. The amazingly uncanny similarity of this television show with the events of 9/11 intrigued me and led to my discovery that a senior Israeli intelligence agent named Arnon Milchan was very closely connected with Fox TV, the company that produced the program.

In 2001 Milchan had long been connected to both Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Corp. and its many subsidiaries, and to Gerald Levin, president and CEO of Time Warner and CNN. The success of the Israeli-produced false-flag terror spectacle was critically dependent on the major news media pushing the official, but unproven, explanation and ignoring the many unanswered questions about what really happened. As the highest-level Israeli intelligence agent in the United States, Milchan certainly seemed to be "Mossad's Man in the Middle", co-ordinating the 9/11 cover up with the two largest news media outlets in the United States.

Confidential: The Life of Secret Agent Turned Hollywood Tycoon - Arnon Milchan is a recently published biography of Arnon Milchan (July 2011), the Israeli weapons smuggler/dealer who helped create Israel's nuclear arsenal. Written by the Israeli Meir Doron, a family friend who was raised in Milchan's hometown of Rehovot, and his brother-in-law Joseph Gelman, Confidential is a sympathetic biography written by a couple Zionist Jews, which explains their comparison of Milchan with James Bond in the prologue.

Like most things concerning Israel, how one views Arnon Milchan is all a matter of perspective. A Zionist devoted to the State of Israel may very well see Milchan as a Jewish James Bond while an American like myself is much more likely to view Milchan as one of Ian Fleming's villains, not unlike Ernst Stavro Blofeld (a.k.a. "Number One"), the evil genius with aspirations of world domination as head of the global criminal organization SPECTRE, The Special Executive for Counterintelligence, Terrorism, Revenge, and Extortion.

LAKAM'S AGENT NUMBER ONE - Arnon Milchan's illegal smuggling of 810 krytron triggers for an off-the-books nuclear arsenal in the hands of a global criminal organization of Zionist terrorists is something that Ian Fleming's criminal masterminds would have tried to pull off... Ernst Stavro Blofeld, "Number One" and head of SPECTRE.

There is, of course, a fundamental difference between the James Bond character and Arnon Milchan. Bond (Agent 007) is an agent of the British secret service who is sent on missions to find and neutralize foreign criminal organizations that pose a grave danger to Britain and the West by stealing their nuclear secrets and technology. Arnon Milchan, on the other hand, has long been a master thief and senior agent in such an organization, LAKAM or Mossad II. LAKAM is the very same "rogue outfit" run by Rafael "Dirty Rafi" Eitan in the 1980s that controlled Jonathan J. Pollard, the American Jew who was caught spying for Israel in 1985. Since the 1960s Milchan has been actively engaged in helping Israel create an off-the-books nuclear arsenal, which is at the center of the current instability in the Middle East - and the world.

The Mossad spymaster Rafi Eitan is a senior member of the Israeli
Knesset although he is a wanted criminal in the United States. Here Eitan (top) and Ehud Barak, two of the chief suspects of 9/11, sit together in the Knesset, October 2008.

In reading the Milchan biography I found a number of interesting bits of information, which are included in this article with my comments. One of the most interesting things I learned was that Milchan's first big film, in which he invested two million dollars, involved a key scene in which a passenger airliner is flown into a high rise building. The British/French film, The Medusa Touch, was released in 1978. It is worth noting that the Russian Jewish Lord Lew Grade (born Lev Winogradsky) immediately bought the film's foreign rights for $5 million before it was even produced, putting Milchan ahead by a million dollars.

The climactic scene of The Medusa Touch (1978) is of a passenger plane being remotely controlled (by mind) and flown into a high rise building.

The Israeli agent Arnon Milchan's first big film simulated a plane crashing into a high rise - in 1978. This happens to have been the same year that the former Mossad chief, Isser Harel, predicted that Arab terrorists would strike New York City's tallest tower. This is no coincidence.

Such a scene had never been filmed before and required a great deal of work to make it look real...

and to achieve the desired effect, which can be seen in the short clip from the movie below. (The added comments can be ignored.)

Video URL -

It should be noted that Arnon Milchan is one of Israel's longest serving and most senior intelligence agents, having served the State of Israel since the early 1960s. For Milchan to produce a film that depicts an airliner flying into a high rise in the same year (1978) that the former head of Israeli intelligence predicted an attack by Arab terrorists on the tallest building in New York City is certainly no coincidence. This is when the terrorist Likudniks came to power in Israel and when high level Israeli terrorists began planning 9/11. Milchan's movie was useful in visualizing the false-flag attacks that occurred 23 years later.

The following are a few extracts from Confidential with my comments on the Israeli-written biography of Arnon Milchan.

"Arnon is a special man. It was I who recruited him. Working secretly, from outside the official system, he brought extraordinary ideas and a level of creativity that greatly contributed to our country. When I was at the Ministry of Defense, Arnon was involved in numerous defense-related procurement activities and intelligence operations. His strength is in making connections at the highest levels in countries around the world, including important countries with which Israel does not officially maintain relationships. His activities gave us a huge advantage, strategically, diplomatically and technologically…"
- Israeli President Shimon Peres, 8 February 2010

“Arnon Milchan was the Chuck Norris of LAKAM.”
- Amnon Abromovich, Globes (Israel), 24 April 2008


Rules that applied to others did not apply to Milchan; perhaps it was not a “license to kill,” but very close to it. He fronted secret bank accounts for the State of Israel – accounts that would be used to finance his country’s most covert and sometimes deadly intelligence operations around the globe. (p. 18)

Bollyn: Milchan controlled Israeli government-backed accounts and front companies that financed “the special needs of the entirety of Israel’s intelligence operations outside the country.” The “special needs” included buying components to build and maintain Israel’s nuclear arsenal.


[Moshe] Dayan pointed at Milchan and told Peres, “You know what, Shimon? I want Arnon as minister of finance.”

“OK,” Peres replied with a sly smile…

What Milchan did not understand was that Dayan and Peres had in mind a completely different kind of “minister of finance,” unelected, secret, far outside the country, and in service indefinitely. (p. 39)


Immediately upon embarking on the massive, covert Israeli version of the Manhattan Project, Peres (who is today a Nobel Peace laureate) realized that he would have to deceive people on a large scale to avoid discovery… He also realized that the program would need to gain access to material and equipment that was not easily obtainable on the open market, and that few countries would be willing to sell such material to Israel.

To overcome these complex and daunting problems, Peres decided to create a new top-secret agency, a unit so secret that even Israel’s vaunted intelligence agency, the Mossad, would not be aware of its existence for years to come, even though it operated right under its very nose. (p. 44)


In the early 1970s, the unit would adopt the name Science Liaison Bureau, or LAKAM, its Hebrew acronym, and was nicknamed “Mossad II.” Its original narrow mission was to secure the materials and the equipment that would make the production of nuclear bombs possible. (p. 44)


The close working relationship between Milchan and [Benjamin] Blumberg was exceedingly productive, and much of it will never be known… When Blumberg needed a thousand tons of ammonium perchlorate, Butarez, carbon-carbon, inertial-grade gyros and accelerometers, precision tracking radars, and other such basic material required by anyone seeking to develop a nuclear deterrent, it was Milchan he would call.

Milchan’s constant movement between countries and continents make him an elusive target for any counterintelligence effort against him, and it made him the most productive asset for LAKAM and for the State of Israel. (p. 54)


But Milchan took it even a step further. He offered Peres and Dayan the use of his company as a front in order to open subsidiaries wherever LAKAM or the Mossad deemed necessary for their activities.

Milchan would open accounts and front companies for the State of Israel, essentially putting him in charge of the mechanisms and the resources to finance the special needs of the entirety of Israel’s intelligence operations outside of the country. This is how Milchan gradually became the indispensable man in the middle. (p. 60)

The surprise that rocked Israel following the elections to the Ninth Knesset on May 17, 1977, shook the country to its political foundation. The conservative Likud party, under the leadership of Menachem Begin came to power for the first time, ousting the Labor Party, which had controlled all political power in the country in one form or another since its inception…

Milchan quickly adapted to the new political leaders [Likud was comprised of Zionist terrorists from the Irgun] in town; Shimon Peres was a real soul mate, but soon Arnon would develop close friendships with others, including incoming minister of defense Ezer Weizman. His friendships and contacts were deep and spanned the entire political spectrum, which placed him as a bridge between the intelligence establishment and the new government – a role that he has continued to play ever since, with almost every Israeli government.


Using middlemen made it harder for outside observers to follow exactly what Israel was purchasing, since the sales were made not to the Israeli government, but to another entity, sometimes even multiple entities. In fact, this is a common counterintelligence practice. The fact that commissions were extracted along the way and funneled into secret accounts controlled by Milchan to finance Israel’s covert activities was only the icing on the cake. (p. 137)


In 1981, Benjamin Blumberg finally met his match in Ariel “the Bulldozer” Sharon, who was appointed Israel’s new minister of defense. Sharon decided to replace Blumberg with his close friend of many years and former head of the Mossad, Rafi Eitan. He viewed the role of LAKAM chief as one of the most crucial positions in Israel’s vast defense machinery. The infighting continued for a few months, but eventually the transition took place. The fifty-five-year-old Rafi Eitan was a short man with thick glasses and a long career in the Mossad behind him. It was Eitan who personally commanded the squad that captured Adolf Eichmann in Argentina. He was well acquainted with Milchan, and was well aware of his activities on behalf of LAKAM. (p. 145)

As Israel's key operations agent since the mid 1960s, Milchan has been at the top Israel's intelligence establishment since 1965.


He understood that Hollywood throws money at those who have money, so from time to time he would flaunt it, but only with a larger strategic purpose in mind. Metaphorically speaking, the trick was to use the million dollars in the bank to project an image of thirty million. It was his modus operandi since day one. (p. 202)


"I expect that nobody in the Israeli government is interested in the fact that you skimmed off sixty percent of all the profit on things that Milco International, Inc. sent to Milchan Bros. After all, Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel before Sharon [and current], worked for Milchan Bros. Could it be that part of the sixty percent you “skimmed” was for Israeli Government officials? …

"Well, Arnon, if I’m extradited to the U.S. and stand trial for shipping krytrons to your company, Milchan Bros., the world is going to know all the shady dealing you were involved in – I’m sure."
- Richard Kelly Smyth’s letter to Arnon Milchan from prison in Spain, 22 August 2001 (p. 215)

Bollyn: There was no trial, of course, and Smyth was given a deal in which he plead guilty to one charge and received 40 months in the federal prison system in California. Smyth, as president of the company Milco International Inc., was originally indicted for selling 810 krytrons to an Israeli-based firm, Heli Corp. The owner of Heli Corp, Arnon Milchan, denied involvement in the $60,000 krytron deal. Milco ("Milchan Co.") was also established by Milchan. This is a very good example of how Mossad companies are often on both sides of a deal, as seller and buyer, not unlike what happened to the steel evidence from the World Trade Center after 9/11, when it was shipped by Zionist controlled scrap dealers in New Jersey to Zionist controlled steel companies in Asia - to be destroyed.

Smyth, a former scientific adviser to the U.S. Air Force and to NATO, pleaded guilty to one count of violating the Arms Export Control Act and to making a false statement to Customs. Prosecutors dropped 28 other counts. A trial would have shed light on Arnon Milchan and the role of Israel's LAKAM in the illegal smuggling of nuclear triggers. In such sensitive matters, like the false-flag terrorism of 9/11, an open trial is the last thing the Zionist crimocracy wants.

Milchan succeeded in smuggling 810 krytron nuclear triggers to Israel before being discovered in 1985. Israel returned 710, saying that one hundred krytrons had been destroyed. While Richard Kelly Smyth spent 16 years as a fugitive in Spain and then went to prison, the Israeli who masterminded the whole operation, Arnon Milchan, was not even charged and allowed to continue his illegal activities on behalf of Israel in Hollywood and elsewhere.


Oliver Stone didn’t take this very well. He had a contract for another movie with Milchan. He briefly considered the outrageous idea of a film from a script that had been circulating in Hollywood more as a joke than anything else. The working title was Uzi Falafel, and it told the story of an obnoxious Israeli arms dealer who made a lot of money and parlayed it into a new career producing movies. (p. 229)


“A top Hollywood executive once warned me to stay clear of Milchan. He told me that Arnon was a Middle Eastern rug dealer. Beware. I should have listened to him, he was right. He is as cheap as they come. He is sick about money, obsessed with losing it. I learned a very hard lesson, and it cost me a lot of my personal money. I don’t want to get into a pissing contest, but Arnon can be very nasty.”
- Oliver Stone, “The Last Tycoon”, Los Angeles Magazine, April 2000 (p. 229)


Milchan will not forget that first dinner with the person who became one of his best friends and business partner, Rupert Murdoch, the owner of News Corporation, the parent company of Twentieth Century Fox…

Milchan then asked Murdoch for a favor. He didn’t want to consummate the deal without the blessing of his friend Gerald Levin, president and CEO of Time Warner…

Fifty-five percent of New Regency remained in Milchan’s hands. Kerry Packer kept his twenty-five percent, and Murdoch picked up twenty percent for about $200 million…

Part of the deal between Fox and New Regency was the establishment of a new TV division. Milchan brought in a good friend, ambitious Israeli TV personality Yair Lapid, to head up the new department. (p. 240)

Bollyn: Yair Lapid is the TV personality who interviewed 3 of the 5 Israeli operatives who were arrested on 9/11 in New Jersey. Oded Ellner, one of the three, told Lapid in November 2001 that their "purpose had been to document the event", the event being the 9/11 destruction of the World Trade Center. Having said they are not agents of Mossad, Lapid did not ask the three who had sent them on their mission. It was understood. The other two Israeli terror suspects, the Kurzberg brothers, who sat in Yair Lapid's audience were known to U.S. law enforcement as agents of Mossad. Hence they did not appear on the show, so the denial of belonging to Mossad could be made without being a false statement.

Video URL -


Gradually, after the year 2000, Arnon began to bring his children into key positions at New Regency. Yariv and his sisters, Alexandra and Elinor, had grown up in boarding schools with a heavy dose of French culture, but as they matured they were exposed to a very wide world thanks to regular international travel with their father. Every year they spent at least one month in Israel and were brought up knowing that they were “members of the tribe,” with all of the historical connotations and responsibilities that implied. (p. 246)


From his earliest days, Milchan has had a passion for Israeli politics, and despite his global interests, he has consistently sought to influence the course of historic events in the Middle East from behind the scenes… (p. 247)

Kadima won the elections, Peres was appointed deputy prime minister, and all of his demands were fulfilled. But like his Rafi adventure years earlier, his dream never really materialized. Sharon suffered a series of strokes and became incapacitated. Another close friend of Milchan, the man who named his movie Pretty Woman, Ehud Olmert, became prime minister instead. (p. 249)

Milchan kicked into high gear, maneuvering behind the scenes to replace the president with his longtime friend and mentor, Shimon Peres. By the time Katsav finally resigned, Milchan had already arranged virtual wall-to-wall support for Peres to replace him as the country’s president…

The first official letter written by the new president was to thank his longtime friend Milchan, who had stuck with him through thick and thin, to see him to this day…

He's also the de facto Israeli consul general on the West Coast of the United States… He also serves as the primary host of Hollywood’s elite when they come to Israel, usually at his initiative. An invitiation from Milchan to visit Israel is an indication of having arrived in Hollywood. (p. 250)


In 2008, Milchan sold Milchan Bros. to a former Mossad agent by the name of Yossi Maiman. (p. 257)

Bollyn: Yossi Maiman also happens to be the Mossad agent who obtained a great deal of control over the lucrative gas fields of Turkmenistan. Linking these Israeli-owned gas fields to India and China by a pipeline crossing Afghanistan is one of the strategic goals of the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan. Maiman and Milchan are partners in other Israeli ventures.


Milchan relocated New Regency from Warner Bros. to Fox in 1998 after News Corp. agreed to make a $200-million equity investment in the company.

On January 14, 2011, New Regency and Fox signed an agreement to extend their distribution relationship through 2022, while at the same time providing a more active role for New Regency involving Fox releases. (p. 259)

Bollyn: Milchan's partnership with Rupert Murdoch and Fox TV began in 1998. Two years later this partnership produced the pilot episode of The Lone Gunmen in which a passenger airliner was hijacked by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center. The program aired on Fox TV in March 2001.

Murdoch's initial $200 million investment in Milchan's company in 1998 is something of a mystery. Why did Murdoch buy into a dodgy company run by an Israeli nuclear criminal? It is, of course, most likely the result of Murdoch simply doing as he is told by the Zionist financiers, e.g. the Rothschilds, who support his Zionist propaganda empire. As the New York Times wrote in July 2011 about Confidential:

In the late 1990s, the News Corporation, which owns Fox, paid $200 million for a 20 percent stake in Mr. Milchan’s Regency Enterprises. A News Corporation spokeswoman, Teri Everett, had no immediate response to a query about the company’s reason for backing Mr. Milchan, and about any reaction by its chief executive, Rupert Murdoch, to revelations in the new book.


Rafi Eitan went on to a successful political career as the head of Israel’s Gil (Pensioners) Party. He served in the Knesset and as special minister without portfolio, advising the prime minister on national security matters. Since the Pollard affair in 1985, Eitan has not been allowed to travel to the United States, where he could be arrested if he did…

LAKAM was officially disbanded as a result of the Pollard affair in 1985. However, it continues to operate worldwide, except in the United States, under a new name. (p. 261)


Israel gained it modern nuclear deterrence capabilities because of the covert efforts of many people, but Milchan was one of the most essential. (p. 262)


To counter the growing threat, the renamed LAKAM and the Mossad have kicked into high gear. Every known computer system sent to Iran over the past decade has been bugged with monitoring devices. Every possible high-tech system, such as aircraft electronics and spare parts, has been tampered with. (p. 262)


When legendary media mogul Sumner Redstone told us that he considers Milchan to be “Mr. Israel,” he had little idea how accurate his sentiments actually are. If one could imagine a single, indispensable person in the middle who knows where all of the bodies are buried when it comes to Israel’s secret wars, it would be none other than this heavyweight Hollywood producer, who spends his life seamlessly moving between the world of fame and secrecy, fantasy and reality, war and peace. (p. 264)

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Confidential: The Life of Secret Agent turned Hollywood Tycoon - Arnon Milchan
Meir Doron and Joseph Gelman, Gefen Publishing House Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel 2011

Bollyn, Christopher, "The Mass Media & the 9/11 Cover-Up", Chapter VIII, Solving 9/11

Bollyn, "America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism", Chapter III, Solving 9/11

Bollyn, "Israel's Secret Super Thermite Lab", 26 August 2009

Cieply, Michael, "New Book Recounts Tale of Israeli Agent at Home in Hollywood", New York Times, 17 July 2011

Clip from The Medusa Touch (1978),, 3 October 2011

How Thermite and Explosives Brought Down WTC 2

September 23, 2011

"I can say with certainty there must have been explosive material that was set off in sequence. "
- Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of Iran and engineer (PhD), claiming that jetliners were not the only reason the World Trade Center towers collapsed, 22 September 2011

"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse…It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that."
- Van Romero, explosion expert, “Explosives Planted In Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says”, Albuquerque Journal, 11 September 2001

In an interview with the Associated Press on 22 September 2011, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad stated "as an engineer" that he is certain that there was explosive material involved in the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center on 9/11. Ahmadinejad, who earned his PhD in transportation engineering in 1997, is certainly not alone in this opinion.

There are nearly 1,600 professionals at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth who do not believe the official version and demand a "truly independent investigation" into what really happened to the Twin Towers when they were demolished with more than 2,600 people within them. But one does not need to be an engineer to understand that the Twin Towers were demolished with Thermite cutter charges and explosives. It is quite obvious from what we saw when the South Tower "collapsed".

I have been of the opinion that the Twin Towers and WTC 7 were demolished with explosives since 9/11 and have written extensively about the subject. The discovery of molten iron in the rubble and billions of "iron-rich spheroids" found in the dust of the demolished towers are proof that large amounts of molten iron were produced prior to the explosive demolition of the World Trade Center. A large cascade of tons of molten iron was seen falling from the 81st floor of the South Tower (WTC 2) in the minutes before it collapsed.

Tons of molten iron poured from the 81st floor of WTC 2 in the minutes before it collapsed. One cubic meter of iron weighs more than 8 tons.

The cascade of molten iron can been seen pouring from the corner in this ABC video after 30 seconds. Video Link -

A sophisticated form of Thermite was found in the dust of the World Trade Center by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University in 2007. Thermite is an incendiary combination of grains of aluminum and ferrous oxide, which produces molten iron and aluminum oxide (whitish smoke) during an intense heat-producing (exothermic) reaction. Other elements can be added to the thermitic mixture to achieve different effects such as orange flames. Thermite cutter charges are thought to have been used to cut the 47 core columns of the Twin Towers causing them to collapse.

The exterior columns (blue) and the crucial 47 core columns (red), which supported the gravity load of the tower and which would have had to have been cut in order for the tower to fall - or for the top section to tilt and topple...

as it did in the beginning of the "collapse". The fact that this 30-story section is tilting and falling indicates that the 47 core columns on floor 81 had all been cut with Thermite seconds before explosive charges blew out the remaining exterior columns. The top section of the tower would not have tilted had the core columns not been cut.

Large amounts of white smoke, indicative of Thermite, were seen at the beginning of the demolition.

The top section was pulverized by explosives in mid-air hidden behind clouds of smoke and dust.

The photographs and videos of the collapse of WTC 2 indicate that a large amount of Thermite had been placed on the 81st floor of the South Tower (the computer floor of Fuji Bank) and that Thermite cutter charges were used to cut the core columns. During the cutting of the core columns a large amount of molten iron was created, some of which was seen falling from the damaged East corner of the tower. White smoke indicative of aluminum oxide was also observed coming from the floor.

Immediately after the cutting of the core columns with Thermite charges, explosives were detonated that severed the remaining exterior columns that supported the walls of the tower. These are clearly the events that initiated the "collapse" of WTC 2. Cutting the core columns and then the remaining exterior columns resulted in the 30-story top section tilting about 23 degrees to the South and East, where a large number of exterior columns were missing having been knocked out when the airplane crashed into the tower.

The approximate angel of the plane striking the Southwest-facing wall of the South Tower (FEMA)

More than one-third of the exterior columns of the Southwest wall had been cut by the entry of the plane.

It is certainly not a radical opinion to believe that Thermite and explosives were used to demolish the Twin Towers; it is in fact the only explanation that is supported by the evidence.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "9/11 Planes Flew Directly into Secure Computer Rooms in Both Towers", 11 January 2007

Bollyn, "9/11 — Who Put Thermate in the World Trade Center?" 18 January 2007

Bollyn, "The 'Huge Bullet Hole' in the South Tower and Analysis of Missile Evidence", 17 April 2011

New Video of Demolition of WTC 7

September 17, 2011

The following 45-second video of the demolition of Larry Silverstein's WTC 7 shows what appear to be flashes of explosions as the tower begins falling into its footprint.  Claims are made that the video is fake, but a conclusive determination of its authenticity would require having access to the original video.  It certainly looks real to me and it is exactly what an eyewitness told me he saw immediately before the collapse of the South Tower.

I spoke with an eyewitness whose office is near the World Trade Center. He had been standing among a crowd of people on Church Street, about two-and-a-half blocks from the South Tower, when he saw "a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors 10 and 15." He saw about six of these brief flashes, accompanied by "a crackling sound" before the tower collapsed. Each tower had 47 central support columns.

Video Link -


Bollyn, Christopher, "Survivors Witnessed Explosions Inside Twin Towers", October 17, 2001 

Paul Craig Roberts Interview on 9/11 Cover Up

September 9, 2011

The TV networks mimic Fox News’ faux patriotism. Anyone who depends on print, TV, or right-wing talk radio media is totally misinformed. The Bush administration has achieved a de facto Ministry of Propaganda.
- Paul Craig Roberts,
"Who Will Save America? - My Epiphany", 6 February 2006


James Corbett of Global Research (Canada) has aired an excellent interview with Dr. Paul Craig Roberts on the 9/11 cover up.  There has not even been a proper scientific investigation of what really happened on 9/11, Roberts says.  This one-hour video with Dr. Roberts explains the government/media cover up of 9/11 and the real cause of the U.S. economic crisis very well and is highly recommended viewing. 

Dr. Roberts is an American economist and a columnist for Creators Syndicate. He served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration. He is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service.  As we near the 10th anniversary of 9/11, listening to this interview with Dr. Roberts is an hour well spent.

Video Link -

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Roberts, Paul Craig, "9/11 After A Decade: Have We Learned Anything?", 24 August 2011 

Roberts, Paul Craig, "Who Will Save America? - My Epiphany", 6 February 2006

The Missile Pod of 9/11 and the Cover-Up

Updated September 8, 2011

THE MYSTERY POD - The Lockheed Martin AN/AAS-38 "Nitehawk" is a missile pod system for use with laser-guided munitions.

A similar missile pod is seen on the underside of the plane that struck the South Tower (WTC 2) on 9/11.  

A white hot flash preceded the impact of each plane.  The depleted uranium warhead created a super intense heat and detonated the pre-placed explosives in the secure computer rooms that were hit by both planes.

Parts of the missile were seen exiting the building ahead of the explosion.  The high velocity of these objects indicates they were not part of the aircraft itself.  For my analysis of the missile see "The 'Huge Bullet Hole' in the South Tower and Analysis of Missile Evidence"

I am a former airline captain with over 9,000 flight hours, Captain on both the Boeing 747-400 and 737-300.  After viewing many posted videos on "Youtube" I can tell you without hesitation that clearly aircraft number 2 B-767 - was radio controlled into the building – [World Trade Center] Tower 2.  The "pod" mounted on the bottom of the aircraft, is manufactured by "Martin Marietta" Corporation in Los Angeles. The pod has been used extensively by the USAF for outfitting drone aircraft for over 22 years, and you can clearly see it in (4) of the amateur videos- just before impact, with Tower 2.
- Capt. Thomas Deatherage – Former commercial airline pilot. Aircraft flown: Boeing 737, 747. Certified Flight Instructor (single and multi-engine and instrument). 9,000+ total hours flown.


Dave vonKleist made a excellent 52-minute video in 2004 entitled 
9/11 In Plane Site in which he examined the video evidence showing a missile pod on the plane said to be Flight 175.  In the introduction, vonKleist explains the logic behind the assumption that the people involved in the cover-up of 9/11 are involved in the crime itself.  This is the reason why my book, Solving 9/11, concludes with two chapters, "The Destruction of the Evidence" and "Making Sense of the 9/11 Cover-Up", that indentify the people and groups responsible for the destruction of the crucial evidence from the World Trade Center. 

As vonKleist explained:

On September 11th, 2001, 4 events occurred within an hour and fifteen minutes of one another.  The first event occurred at 8:45 Eastern Standard Time when American Airlines Flight 11 hit the North Tower of the World Trade Center.  And then 18 minutes later, at 9:03 Eastern Time, United Airlines Flight 175 slammed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center.  And then at 9:43, it was reported that American Airlines Flight 77 had hit the Pentagon.  And then finally, at 10:00 Eastern Time, United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

Now, unless this is one incredible coincidence, is it not safe to assume that all four of these events are inescapably married to one another?  And is it not also safe to assume, that if you find one person involved, or a party involved with one of these events they’re probably involved in all of them?  Well, following this train of thought, since there was no credible claim of responsibility, is it not safe to assume that those involved, or those parties involved, or agencies, or groups that were involved in the events of 9/11, would do anything that they can to obfuscate, distract, distort, or cover up any information that might lead to their discovery?  And if that’s true, is it not also safe to assume that if you find somebody, a group, an agency, a party, that is involved in the obfuscation, distraction, distortion, or cover up of any information involved in ANY of the events of 9/11, does it not indicate possible involvement and even guilt in the events of 9/11?

- Dave VonKleist,
9/11 In Plane Site

VonKleist explains the logic of the 9/11 cover-up at minute 5:55 of this video clip. 
Video Link -

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "The "Huge Bullet Hole" in the South Tower and Analysis of Missile Evidence", 17 April 2011

The Zion Crime Factory - Israel and 9/11

September 19, 2011

Zion Crime Factory presents an excellent compilation of video clips and other evidence supporting the case of Israeli involvement in 9/11.  The Works and Research of ZionCrimeFactory are now at a new permanent location on the Internet:

Graphic from "Israel Did 9/11" by ZionCrimeFactory

The Israeli Connection to 9/11

September 2, 2011

The title page from "The Israeli Connection to 9/11"

A research professor emeritus from an American university recently sent me a note under the rubric, "Great Article and Great Work!"

The professor wrote:

I only recently came across and reviewed an old article of yours, when cleaning out my "Favorites" list on Internet Explorer. It's the article entitled Mossad - The Israeli Connection To 9/11, on

The complete article can be read here:

The good professor concluded:

I hope to find time soon to read more of your articles from your website. it's great work that you've done. I wish it could snowball into a public call for a new, unbiased, logical & scientific investigation of 9-11. I hope you've found many colleagues of like mind, such as Richard Gage, to link efforts with. 

The Legend of 9/11 - 10 Years On

September 2, 2011

Anthony Lawson has produced an excellent video on "The Legend of 9/11 - 10 Years On".  This video of 9 minutes and 11 seconds is highly recommended viewing.  If, after viewing Lawson's video, you have serious questions about the planes of 9/11, I would suggest reading the second chapter of my book, Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World:  "The Planes of 9/11".

Video Link - 

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "The Planes of 9-11", 25 October 2007 

"9/11 - Ten Years On" Reveals BBC Bias

August 30, 2011

There is something wrong here.  If you have seen Building 7, there's no way back.  I have no way back.  If you fight you might lose, but if you don't fight you have lost.  There is no way that our civilization can continue without facing these unsolved questions of 9/11.
- Niels Harrit on BBC program "9/11 - Ten Years On"

The BBC reported that WTC 7, the Salomon Brothers building, had collapsed - before it actually collapsed.  With such glaring problems on the record it is hardly surprising that the BBC claims to have accidently destroyed all of its 9/11 tapes.  Just a "cockup" it claims - nothing intentional.

Last night, the BBC aired a program about 9/11 on its British television network BBC Two.  The program, produced by Mike Rudin, is entitled "The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - Ten Years On".

"World Update", a radio program on the BBC World Service, featured a 10-minute piece on 29 August about the conspiracy theories surrounding the events of 9/11.  The piece about the 9/11 can be heard from 32:30 minutes into the show until minute 43.  The program can be heard (for only 6 days from today) at this link:

I recommend listening to the 10-minute piece with host Dan Damon and Mike Rudin, the producer of the program on 9/11, because it reveals the BBC's bias against 9/11 truth seekers like myself.  Dan Damon's attitude, which comes through quite clearly, is that 9/11 skeptics are fools who lack intelligence or compassion for the relatives. 

The BBC even commissioned a poll to be taken in the United States and Britain to get an idea of how people think about 9/11 conspiracy theories after 10 years.  One thousand people were polled in each country in July 2011 and asked the following question:

It is generally accepted that these attacks were carried out by al Qaida. However some people have suggested there was a wider conspiracy that included the American government. Do you, yourself, believe that there was a wider conspiracy, or not?

The GfK NOP poll found that one-in-four people between the ages of 16 and 24 believe there was a wider conspiracy behind 9/11.  Among the general population the ratio was one-in-seven.  In the United States, 15 percent of those asked believe the government is part of the conspiracy.  Only two-in-three, some 68 percent, think there was no conspiracy.  Although the poll revealed that there are very significant numbers of people in Britain and the U.S. who believe the government is involved in the cover-up of 9/11, the BBC does not give this important minority the respect it gives to much smaller racial, religious, or political minority groups.  Why does the BBC treat us differently than other minorities?

Such lack of respect from the BBC for 9/11 truth is not at all surprising, but is to be expected.  A bias is a partiality that prevents objective consideration of an issue or situation.  The BBC, in lock step with the controlled media in the United States, has consistently shown a partiality for the unproven fairy tale that Osama Bin Laden and 19 Arabs are responsible for all the death and destruction of 9/11, and has completely avoided any objective consideration of the evidence that disproves this official version.

The BBC, as a taxpayer-funded news organization, actually claims that it accidently destroyed all of its 9/11 tapes shortly after the attacks!  Is that believable?  The BBC has also consistently ignored, from Day One, the eyewitness report of its own reporter, Steven Evans, who reported observing "a series of exposions" at the base of the World Trade Center long before either tower collapsed. 

Understanding BBC's institutional bias against 9/11 truth is essential to understanding who is really behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11.  It could hardly be more obvious.  The people who wield the financial power behind the British government and BBC are ultimately responsible for the BBC's institutional bias against 9/11 truth.  The Rothschild family, for example, has a long history of holding key executive positions on the governing board of the BBC through people like Marcus Agius.  The current director of the BBC Trust, the governing body of the BBC, is a London financial man named Nicholas Kroll.

Nicholas Kroll is Director of Governance of BBC Trust

Mike Rudin, the producer of "9/11 - Ten Years On", said that most of the conspiracy theories lack coherence.  "Rarely do you get a very coherent theory with a very clear idea about motives, exactly how it could have happened," Rudin said.  But the BBC did not contact me about the theory developed in my book Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World.  They certainly have a very good reason to avoid discussing my book.  Solving 9/11 provides a "very coherent theory with a very clear idea about motives" about who is really behind 9/11. 

It's not that the BBC is unaware of my work.  In June 2005 the BBC interviewed me in London after a press conference in which I had appeared with several speakers who were part of Jimmy Walter's European 9/11 truth tour.  "Why are you the only American journalist that does not believe the government version of 9/11?" was the first question the BBC asked me.

The BBC asked me for an interview when I visited London in June 2005.

A year later, in August 2006, the "only American journalist that does not believe the government version of 9/11" became the only American journalist to be assaulted by undercover police at his home.  The brutal assault I suffered at the hands of three heavily armed undercover "tactical" police at my home certainly did not interest the BBC, nor did the malicious prosecution that followed. 

Video of Missile Hitting Pentagon

August 26, 2011

The following 3-minute video contains footage of what appears to be a white missile-like object hitting the Pentagon on 9/11.  This video first appeared in September 2010 and I wrote about it at the time in this article.  The footage of the missile strike, if authentic, seems to come from a helicopter hovering near the Pentagon when it was struck.

In the video the white streaking object seems to approach from the inverse angle of what actually struck the Pentagon.  It may be that the image has been reversed but it doesn't seem to jibe with the direction seen in the ASCE Pentagon report.

Diagram from ASCE Pentagon report shows damaged columns.

The path of the missile through 6 exterior walls from the E ring to the C ring.

This video also seems to misrepresent the exit hole as the point of entry on the outer wall.  The hole seen in the video is actually the exit hole that the missile made after breaking through three rings (including six exterior walls and numerous structural columns) of the Pentagon.  It should be noted that the photo of the exit hole was taken by the FBI, which prevented the engineers who investigated the damage at the Pentagon from examining this crucial area.

Video Link -

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Video of Missile Hitting the Pentagon", September 21, 2010

Bollyn, "The John Birch Society & 9-11 Disinfo", May 6, 2005

FBI & Police Reports of Israelis Arrested on 9/11

August 25, 2011

The five Mossad terror suspects arrested in New Jersey on 9/11. Sivan and Paul Kurzberg (on right) were known Mossad agents when they were arrested on 9/11.  Their "moving company", Urban Moving Systems of Weehawken, was soon exposed as a Mossad front company.

Video Link -

"OUR PURPOSE WAS TO DOCUMENT THE EVENT" - The Israeli intelligence agents and operatives involved in the attacks on the World Trade Center were allowed to return to Israel.   Omer Marmari, Oded Ellner, and Yaron Shmuel, who apparently were not full Mossad agents at the time, openly divulged the purpose of their mission on an Israeli TV program. Ellner said: "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." 

The Mossadnik Kurzberg brothers were pointed out in the studio audience.

An anonymous blogger has recently posted "The official 2001 FBI docs on Urban Moving Systems and the 9-11-2001 Dancing Israelis incident". This excellent post is essential reading because it contains snips from, and links to, the official FBI and New Jersey police reports on the arrest of the Mossad agents who were seen photographing and celebrating the bombing of the World Trade Center on 9/11.  This incident is extremely important because it was the first indication that the terror attacks of 9/11 were an Israeli false-flag operation.  Having heard the news report over the radio of these terror suspects who turned out to be Mossad agents, this was the subject of the first article that I wrote about 9/11. 

"...the Israelis are visibly happy on nearly all of the photographs."

"...and they appeared to 'high five' one another."


Bollyn, Christopher, "Israeli Terror Suspects Captured by FBI", 18 September 2001 

Bollyn, "Israeli 9-11 Terror Suspects Still Held", 31 October 2001

Bollyn, "9/11 Terror Suspect Hiding in Israel", 31 July 2002 

Bollyn, "The Mossadniks of 9-11: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg", 3 June 2008

Police Report of 9/11 Arrest of "Five Dancing Israelis", East Rutherford P.D. (N.J.), 11 September 2001

Profiles: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, History Commons 

"The official 2001 FBI docs on Urban Moving Systems and the 9-11-2001 Dancing Israelis incident", 17 August 2011

Architects and Engineers Demand Proper 9/11 Investigation

August 22, 2011

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has produced an excellent 15-minute video on the demolition of the World Trade Center that demands a new and independent investigation of what really happened on 9/11.  The video is very well made and highly recommended viewing.

Video Link -

Lawson Video on "No Planes" Theory

Updated August 5, 2011

Anthony Lawson has made another excellent new video entitled "The Absurdity of the No Planes in New York Theory" in which he challenges the "No Planes" theory promoted by James Fetzer and others.  Lawson also wrote an article, titled "9/11: The Absurdity of the No-Planes-in-New York Theory" that supports his video.

There is one point in the latest Lawson video where I am not in complete agreement.  After exchanging emails with Mr. Lawson, I have decided to clarify my position on this point. 

The photographs and videos clearly show two very fast moving objects flying out of the South Tower ahead of the explosion.  Lawson identifies one of these as the engine that was found on Murray Street.  I agree with him on that, but I do not think this engine is from the aircraft, but is rather part of a depleted uranium missile that was fired into the tower just before the plane made impact.  I think both objects seen flying out of the South Tower are parts of this missile.  The object that is burning white hot is probably the remaining depleted uranium warhead leaving a dark trail of uranium oxides.  The gap between the extremely hot burning uranium warhead and the visible oxides could be due to the fact that the oxides need to cool before they are visible. 

The two fast-moving objects that came out of the South Tower had incredible momentum.

The right engine of the aircraft (about 9 feet in diameter) would have broken through at least three 14-inch exterior box columns on entry, which would have robbed it of most of its forward momentum.  The aircraft engine would not have had enough momentum to pass through the building, break through more box columns on the far side of the tower, and carry on for a few hundred meters down the street.  This is as far-fetched as Arlen Specter's "Magic Bullet" of the JFK assassination.

This NIST diagram shows the right engine hitting the spandrel of the 82nd floor, which means that the engine that is thought to have flown through the tower would have first broken through the spandrel and three 14-inch box columns, the 4-inch concrete floor, its steel pan, and dense trusswork - edgewise.  It is simply impossible for the right engine to have passed through all these solid obstacles, broken through the box columns on the far side, and carried on for several hundred meters further down the street.  This engine would not have passed through the tower.  Source: NIST Report on the World Trade Center

I have written an analysis of these two objects in an article from April 2011 entitled "The 'Huge Bullet Hole' in the South Tower and Analysis of Missile Evidence".  The object that is burning white hot has the characteristics of a burning depleted uranium warhead.  While one of these two objects is probably the engine that landed on Murray Street, I do not think it is the one that is burning white hot.  The engine that landed on the street has not been identified and is probably part of the missile that carried the depleted uranium warhead. 

Two objects came out of the South Tower ahead of the explosions.  Note the gap between the burning object and the dark oxides it produces.

The FEMA report says that one is an engine and the other is "landing gear".  Landing gear would not burn white hot.  If this landing gear landed on the Burlington Coat Factory, why was it not shown in any photographs?

This engine, "the bullet from the smoking gun" that killed hundreds of people on 9/11, was never identified and was treated as garbage.  Judging by the sign and the square placed on top of it, this part of the engine is only about two feet (60 cm) wide.  Why was this engine not identified by its time-tracked parts if it truly came from the airliner that is said to have hit the South Tower?  My opinion is that this is part of the missile that penetrated the tower immediately before the aircraft made impact.

Anthony Lawson's new video can be viewed here: 

Video Link -

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "The 'Huge Bullet Hole' in the South Tower and Analysis of Missile Evidence", April 2011

Lawson, Anthony, "9/11: The Absurdity of the No-Planes-in-New York Theory", 1 August 2011, 

9/11 and Israel: Interview with Alan Sabrosky

July 18, 2011

Dr. Alan Sabrosky, Managing Editor at Veterans Today, was interviewed on 9/11 and Israel’s involvement and their influence in American affairs. Dr. Sabrosky is interviewed by Susan Modaress of Press TV...

Alan sticks to the facts, takes the facts to logical conclusions and stops there. Any American of any political leaning or ethnicity can and should, out of patriotism and out of sanity, watch this interview.
- Gordon Duff, Veterans Today

The Alan Sabrosky interview and commentary from Gordon Duff can also be seen here: 

The Death of American Democracy by Anthony Lawson

July 8, 2011

Anthony Lawson has produced an excellent new video entitled "The Death of American Democracy".  This video deals with the corrupting influence of fifth column Zionists who undermine the American republic from within the corridors of power.  This video is highly-recommended viewing.

Video Link -

Demystifying 9/11 by Alan Sabrosky

June 30, 2011

Source -

Many years ago I read a fascinating discussion of the “tactics of mistake.” This essentially entailed using a target’s prejudices and preconceptions to mislead them as to the origin and intent of the attack, entrapping them in a tactical situation that later worked to the attacker’s strategic advantage.

This is what unfolded in the 9/11 attacks that led us into the matrix of wars and conflicts, present (Afghanistan and Iraq), planned (Iran and Syria) and projected (Jordan and Egypt), that benefit Israel and no other country — although I concede that many private contractors and politicians are doing very well for themselves out of the death and misery of others.

I am also absolutely certain as a strategic analyst that 9/11 itself, from which all else flows, was a classic Mossad-orchestrated operation. But Mossad did not do it alone. They needed local help within America (and perhaps elsewhere) and they had it, principally from some alumni of PNAC (the misnamed Project for a New American Century) and their affiliates within and outside of the US Government (USG), who in the 9/11 attacks got the “catalytic event” they needed and craved to take the US to war on Israel’s behalf, only eight months after coming into office.
- Dr. Alan Sabrosky,

Alan Sabrosky's latest article about 9/11 is an excellent analysis of great historical importance.  Sabrosky believes, as I do, that the terror attacks that ushered in the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" were part of an Israeli military intelligence/Zionist fifth column false-flag operation.  It is very important for the public to see that a person with Dr. Sabrosky's insight and credentials as a military strategist is openly supporting the thesis I have been researching and developing for the better part of the past 10 years.  

I have investigated and written about the hypothesis that 9/11 was an Israeli false-flag operation since September 2001, and was for many years like one hand clapping.  I was the only journalist working on an hypothesis that was strictly taboo in the mainstream (i.e. Zionist-controlled) media - and the 9/11 "truth" movement.  I was banned from most 9/11 "truth" conferences and prevented from speaking at forums where I was supposed to speak.  To have Dr. Sabrosky finally validate my thesis with his extremely insightful and articulate analysis is a great relief.  I have paid a very heavy price for writing about a subject most would simply prefer to ignore. 

There is, however, one point I would add to Sabrosky's analysis.  There is something about the Zionist state of Israel that is not widely known, but that needs to be clearly understood.  That is the salient fact that Israel is ruled by a small group of absolutely ruthless extremists who have been raised as the sons and disciples of zealous Zionist terrorists.  The ruling Likud party, currently headed by prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was actually founded by Menachem Begin, the former head of the Irgun - a notorious terrorist organization in Palestine in the 1930s and 1940s.

Arthur Koestler, a Hungarian Zionist who once served as the personal secretary for Vladimir Jabotinsky, the founder of the Betar and Irgun, described the Irgun as a terrorist movement in "The Rise of Terrorism", a chapter from 
Promise and Fulfilment - Palestine 1917-1949, his book about the creation of the state of Israel:

Irgun was from the beginning organized on the strictly conspiratorial lines of a terrorist underground movement.

...and about the Stern Gang, also known as LEHY or LEHI (Lohmey Heruth Israel), Koestler wrote:

The Sternists were believers in unrestricted and indiscriminate terror.

What is not widely known is that it was the leaders of these two Zionist terrorist factions that created the Likud party in 1973 - and who came to power in Israel in 1977.  Since then, this extremist party of terrorists has ruled Israel for most of the time.  The first political leaders from the Likud that came to power in Israel were Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, the former terrorist leaders of the Irgun and Stern Gang.  It should be noted that this is when the Israeli planning for the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 began.  In 1979, Isser Harel, the former head of the Mossad, told an American Zionist of the "Arab terrorist" plan to attack the tallest buildings in New York City.  9/11, however, was not really planned or carried out by Arabs, but by Israelis who sought to deceive the world by placing the blame on Arab Muslims. 

Zionism is a movement in which a form of social Darwinism has taken place.  That is to say that the most extremist, ruthless, cut-throat, and unscrupulous political players have prevailed over the less violent Zionists.  Israelis often complain that they wanted Athens but got Sparta.  This is true; they got Sparta in spades.

The Israeli leaders that followed Begin and Shamir have been no less ruthless and unscrupulous in their actions.  In early 2001, when Ariel Sharon was elected prime minister, I warned that he was a known genocidaire and terrorist.  What else should one expect from such a leader besides more terrorism and killing?  As history has shown, this is exactly what we got. 

Source:  Dr. Alan Sabrosky, "Demystifying 9/11:  Israel and the Tactics of Mistake", 28 June 2011,

Questions about Olmert's 9/11 Visit to NYC

June 15, 2011

In an effort to learn more about Ehud Olmert's secret visit to New York City on the eve of 9/11, I sent the following question to Shaul and Meir Levy of Wings beachwear company after trying to reach them through their New York City-based real estate company, the Wings Group.  The Levy brothers, Israeli immigrants of Syrian ancestry, have become extremely wealthy selling beach towels, sun lotions, and beachwear.  I was trying to get answers from Shaul and Meir Levy about their meeting with Ehud Olmert in New York City on September 10, 2001.  Although the meeting was reported in a 2004 article about the Betar football club in the Jerusalem Post there has been no discussion of Olmert's 9/11 visit elsewhere.  The Levys are evidently not interested in answering my questions.

Shaul Levy (here with his wife Elaine) has made millions from his chain of beachwear and souvenir shops in the Carolinas, Florida, Massachusetts, Texas, and California.  Levy gave $2 million to create a Chabad Lubavitch center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  He and his brother were co-owners of the right-wing anti-Arab Betar football club of Jerusalem, which is supposedly the reason they met with Ehud Olmert in New York City on the eve of 9/11.  If that is really all their meeting was about why has it been kept secret?

The Levy brothers, Syrian Jewish immigrants from Israel, came to the United States in 1967.  They oddly named their beachwear chain after the "wings" emblem given to Israeli pilots in the air force.  Their beach stores in Florida are usually staffed by young Israeli men fresh out of the military.  How much sense does that make?  The Wings company has a documented history of allowing the Israeli men running their warehouses to sexually abuse female employees.  Such boorish behavior is actually quite typical in Israeli military operations.  Is the Wings network providing logistical services for the Mossad?

The Levy brothers' retail stores are usually stand along operations with large warehouse spaces in the rear.  This does not make a lot of sense.  Is there an off-the-books backdoor business that has enabled the Levys to become millionaires in a competitive market in which most merchants barely break even?  Every other store in Florida sells beach paraphernalia, including the corner drug store.  How is it possible for the Levys to have done so well with so much competition?  Are they running more than beachwear through their network of stores?  Where does all the money come from?

The Levy brothers have grown their Wings business into plazas...

turning small stores like this one (in the Brompton in 1990) at 200 E 86th Street in New York City (a beach store in Manhattan?)...

into large commercial properties.

The Wings Group is based at 666 Broadway in this building in which they own the majority of the floors, according to their website.  The 666 building is also home to Ariel Levy's Avenue Real Estate.

Some of the Wings Group properties are clearly engaged in logistics, like the Levys' Palmetto Center in Myrtle Beach...

like this unmarked warehouse building at their Airport Industrial Park at Myrtle Beach airport in South Carolina...

or this Miami warehouse next to the Opa-Locka airport in Miami...

or this row of warehouse type buildings at 170-180 Jacobs Lane near the Myrtle Beach airport...

and next to this huge warehouse run by the Israeli Rafi Moshe in Socastee, South Carolina.  Why would an Israeli come to America to run a warehouse in South Carolina? 

The warehouse is actually the home of the Israeli-run Strand Imports at 550 George Bishop Parkway - 1 mile from the Myrtle Beach International Airport.  Why are the Levy's invested in warehouse properties near airports on the East Coast?  Is the Levy network involved in drug smuggling?  Is the Wings operation the real reason Israeli "art students" were snooping around DEA offices prior to 9/11?  If you run a large drug smuggling operation you need a multi-state logistics network and inside information from law enforcement agencies to protect the operation.  See the DEA report "Suspicious Activities Involving Israeli Art Students at DEA Facilities"

The Wings group is also developing residential real estate projects in Costa Rica, along the coast - but of course...

and in Jaffa, the old Palestinian port city near Tel Aviv...

and, of course, in Jerusalem - the Israeli occupied capital city of Palestine.  The Levys are very much involved in Israel, especially with the ruling extreme right-wing Betar/Likud faction of Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, Menachem Begin, and Benjamin Netanyahu.  So why did the Levy brothers meet with Ehud Olmert, the Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem, in New York City on the eve of 9/11, and why has this visit been kept secret by the U.S. media and political class?

I called the Wings Group and asked to speak with Shaul or Meir.  I was told by a receptionist named Andrea that I should send my questions by email.  After two days, I have not received any response so I am posting the email that I sent as an open letter:

Question for Shaul and Meir Levy about Betar and Olmert
Monday, June 13, 2011 7:52 AM
From: "Christopher Bollyn"
reception at wingsgroup dot com
CC: ariel dot levy at wingsgroup dot com

Shaul and Meir Levy,
I am a journalist working on an article about Ehud Olmert and the Betar football club.  These questions are for the purpose of this article.
The Jerusalem Post reported that you were formerly co-owners of the Betar football club:
"Three years ago, Betar was sold to a four-man consortium (US businessmen Meir and Shaul Levy, local businessman Meir Finegel, and Jerusalem real estate agent Sasson Shem Tov, who pulled out a few weeks ago), following a meeting in New York with then-mayor Ehud Olmert on September 10, 2001. There were no other potential buyers."

Source:   "A fallen empire," by Daniel Ben-Tal, Jerusalem Post, July 23, 2004
I assume Meir Finegel is actually Meir Panigel?  How long were you owners of the Betar club?  What was the purpose of the meeting in New York with Ehud Olmert on September 10, 2001?  Where did this meeting take place?  Did Mr. Olmert remain in New York until September 11, 2001?
Thank you for your consideration of my request,
Christopher Bollyn

Israel and 9/11: Mossad in Florida

June 6, 2008
Reposted from

Roy Sarfati, on the left, is the son of the Israeli weapons smuggler, Maurice Sarfati, who runs the family business and websites under the alias Moshe Tzorfati.  Does these Americans really know who they are doing business with?

Is the Israeli Weapons Dealer Maurice Sarfati Still Doing Business in Miami?

Maurice Sarfati, the Miami-based Israeli who brokered the 1989 sale of Israeli weapons to the Medellin drug lord Rodriguez Gacha of the Colombian drug cartel, is apparently still doing business in the Miami area under the alias, Moshe Tzorfati.

Sarfati was one of the Israelis who supplied 500 machine guns (Uzis and Galil assault rifles) and other weapons to one of Colombia's most notorious drug traffickers. The illegal weapons transfer was directed by three Israelis, Maurice R. Sarfati, Yair G. Klein, and Israeli Brig. General (Res.) Pinchas Shachar. The deal was financed by Bank Hapoalim, an Israeli bank in New York.

The Colombian authorities discovered the Israeli-made weapons and hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition when they searched the ranch of Jose Rodriguez Gacha after he was ambushed and killed by the Colombian police.

Jane Hunter wrote about the Miami-based Israeli weapons dealers in an article entitled "Covert Operations: The Human Factor." The article appeared in The Link in August 1992.

Hunter wrote about Pinhas Shachar (Shahar):

Shachar, according to a British television report, was a Mossad agent and an “undercover representative” of the state-owned Israeli Military Industries (IMI). He was part of a network of Israeli arms dealers in Miami that had been selling Israeli weapons to Latin America since 1982.

And about Yair Klein:

Klein's work in Colombia, where his Israeli-licensed security company, Spearhead Ltd., trained the hit squads of the Medellin cocaine cartel in assassination and bombing techniques, was beginning to attract unwelcome attention. In August 1989, a promotional film that Spearhead made of the training exercises in Colombia would fall into the hands of Colombian authorities and, to Israel s acute embarrassment, it would be aired by television stations around the world. Colombian authorities would lay much of the blame for the 1989 assassination of a leading presidential candidate, a series of massacres, and the bombings of a passenger aircraft and the headquarters of the domestic intelligence agency on Spearhead's tutelage. In 1988, Klein was in Antigua, looking for a new way to provide arms to his Medellin client, Jose Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha.

About the Sarfati Weapons Deal:

In 1988 Shachar, Klein and Sarfati convinced Antiguan officials to provide a false front to ship $381,500 worth of rifles and ammunition to Medellin boss Rodriguez Gacha. Gen. Shachar placed the order with IMI. His name, Klein's and Sarfati's would all appear on the paperwork for the sale and, when the operation was exposed, Shachar would quickly depart for Israel. 

In March 1989, Israel dispatched the Medellin's guns on a ship, escorted by Captain Philip Earon, subsequently the deputy mayor of Eilat. The arms would be discovered in January 1990, buried on a farm belonging to Gacha's son, with papers and serial numbers identifying Israel as the source. Already fending off charges that it had sanctioned, or assigned, the Spearhead training team to Columbia, Israel insisted that Antigua had ordered the weapons fair and square. Although, after intense international pressure, it put Klein on trial and handed him a token conviction, Israel insists to this day that its security maestros were training Colombian ranchers. 

Klein, depending on which story you believe, was paid in cocaine delivered to him in Israel or in narco-dollars delivered in the U.S. and subsequently transported to Israel by a network of Orthodox Jews specializing in laundering. 

Sarfati used his melon farm as a front for Israeli activities with the Colombian drug cartel. Sarfati's illegal business activities on Antigua had been bankrolled with U.S. taxpayer money from the Overseas Private Investment Corp. (OPIC), an agency of the U.S. government. 

Sarfati's OPIC loan application had been submitted for his company called Roydan (Antigua) Limited. The Roydan company is apparently the combined names of his two sons, Roy J. Sarfati and Dan A. Sarfati. 

By July 1988, Roydan Ltd. was $8 million in debt. By February 1989, Sarfati's Roydan Ltd. was no longer in existence, but Sarfati was. 

Sarfati had received $1.3 million in loans from OPIC in 1985 and 1986, the Washington Post reported in November 1990. OPIC later suspected that not all of the money ended up in melons. In 1988, OPIC sued Sarfati for defaulting on the loans.

The Post article reported:

The loan requirements of the Overseas Private Investment Corp. read like those of any bank in the United States. The only difference is that OPIC is a government agency and if a borrower doesn't pay back a loan, American taxpayers are the losers. 

Under the circumstances, one would expect OPIC to be tight with its money. But one would be disappointed. In recent years OPIC, which lends money for business ventures in developing countries, has come under increasing scrutiny for risky loan practices. Now an investigation into an arms deal threatens to resurrect one loan that OPIC would just as soon keep buried. 

Although there is no evidence that Sarfati was involved in arms trafficking at the time the loans were made, court documents from OPIC's 1988 lawsuit when Sarfati defaulted indicate he was a risky loan. OPIC did a marginal job in checking out Sarfati before handing him $1.3 million. 

For example, in 1983 Sarfati had the Bank of Credit and Commerce in Miami send OPIC a letter of recommendation. The bank called Sarfati "one of our valued customers" and said he had five companies with accounts at the bank. Sarfati later testified in the lawsuit that three of the companies either had no assets or never got off the ground. 

In 1988, the General Accounting Office looked into Sarfati and found that if OPIC had looked closely enough, it would have found that the melon business was showing a loss before OPIC gave Sarfati a second loan.

Maurice Sarfati is apparently still doing business in Miami under the name Moshe Tzorfati. The Sarfati family has a website called the D.R.I.M. group, which apparently uses the first initial of the four family members: Dan, Roy, Ilana, and Maurice -- or Moshe.

The website says this about the D.R.I.M. Group:

Established in 1995, The D.R.I.M. GROUP is a multi faceted group of companies, with diversified activities: 

-Strategic Consulting in sophisticated financing vehicles for income producing real estate and other specific type of businesses.

-Commercial Aviation Consulting.

-Research and Development of a treatment method (Patent pending) for speech dysfluency (stuttering), language and communication disorders.

-Development of specialized centers in traditional and alternative healthcare.

The website provides the contact information:

4601 Sheridan Street
Suite 301
Hollywood, FLORIDA 33021
Tel: 954-965 6924
954-965 6925
Fax: 954-965 6926

MTzorfati at drimgroup dot com

MTzorfati is evidently Moshe Tzorfati, whose website domain is registered at: 19901 E Country Club Dr., Apt. 2101, in Miami. This is in the Zip Code area of 33180, where the Sarfati family (ies) have several residences and relations.

Moshe Tzorfati and Maurice Sarfati are both listed as living at 20314 NE 34th Court. After his criminal role was exposed in supplying weapons to the Colombian drug cartel, he evidently decided to change the spelling of his name. Maurice Sarfati is the name of a famous French actor but that name could no longer be used in Miami and the United States.

Here is Sarfati's old listing from the U.S. Public Records Index:

Name: Maurice Sarfati (along with Ilana and Roy J.)
Birth Date: Jun 1941
Street address: 20314 NE 34th CT
City: Miami
County: Miami-Dade
State: Florida
Zip Code: 33180
Phone Number: 305-466-1832
Record Number: 829168268

Here he is after his Israeli makeover with an new Hebrew alias:

Name: Moshe Tzorfati
Street address: 20314 NE 34th CT
City: Miami
County: Miami-Dade
State: Florida
Zip Code: 33180
Phone Number: 305
Record Number: 838149884

It is interesting that the Sarfati's D.R.I.M. group is involved in aviation, finance, and healthcare. Here are the sections from the website:


The Aviation Consulting Division has extensive experience in commercial aviation. Specifically in the formation of start up companies for passengers transport, charter programs, and cargo airline. 

The Aviation Consulting Division, provides a variety of services, including over-flight rights, landing rights, and opening new routes. Such services were provided to governments, international travel corporations, and airlines. We are uniquely placed to facilitate aircraft refurbishing and pre sale inspections. 


The Financial Strategic Consulting Division developed a structure specifically designed for qualified start up or existing corporations acquiring income producing real estate, to use this vehicle, and seek financing under certain terms, by way of a Private Offering(rule 144-A). This ready structure reduces considerably the time and costs, usually required. 

The D.R.I.M. GROUP engaged a leading legal institution, and a team of experts in sophisticated Asset Backed Securities transactions, to adapt the structure. 


Communication Disorders 

The D.R.IM. GROUP developed a comprehensive treatment program,The Ultimate TM SpeechCare Systems, for individuals who stutter. Innovative and unique techniques, presently under patent review, were developed by Roy J. Sarfati, MS,CCC-SLP, and incorporated for the first time in specific intensive treatment programs for children and adults. Our team consist of highly trained clinicians in a variety of fields, is at the forefront of progress. 

Rejuvenation and Anti-Aging 

This program is one of the most sophisticated and comprehensive available today. Headed and developed by Dr. Cass Terry MD,Ph.D., one of the world leading experts in this field, the program is designed to address every facet of aging and rejuvenation. 

Geriatric and Rehabilitation Centers 

The D.R.I.M. GROUP began diversifying into healthcare in 1997. Its team designed and developed a unique program for Geriatric and Rehabilitation Centers, operated with the state of the art technology.

The activities of the Sarfati family clearly show how Israeli criminals working with their network in Miami are able to operate with impunity. At least for the illegal transfer of weapons to the Colombian drug cartel Maurice Sarfati (a.k.a. Moshe Tzorfati) should be prosecuted and tried. Why has the U.S. government not pursued its case against Sarfati, the Israeli criminal who masterminded illegal Colombian weapons deals from his home in Miami?

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "9-11: The Florida Connection", 21 May 2008 

The Sarfati Connection, Art Students & Israeli Support to Colombian Drug Lords

June 5, 2008
Reposted from 

"Some day, perhaps, if it's decided that the stories can be told, you'll see that the state [ Israel ] has been involved in acts which are a thousand times more dirty than anything going on in Colombia . But these things were decided by the government, in cabinet meetings. As long as the government decides to do something, something that the national interest demanded, then it is legitimate. But if an individual wants to do the same thing, it isn't. That's just the way it is. It's very simple."
- Rafael "Raful" Eitan (killed by a wave), Jerusalem Post, September 1, 1989

Ehud Olmert, the current prime minister of Israel, held a very secret meeting in New York City with two Israeli businessmen, Shaul and Meir Levy, the day before 9-11. Olmert, who was then mayor of Jerusalem, was so secretive about his pre-9-11 meeting that nobody even knew about it for three years after 9-11. Why was the Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem in New York City the day before 9-11 and why has his visit been kept secret?

Shaul Levy of Myrtle Beach and New York City, met with Ehud Olmert in New York City on September 10, 2001.  The Levy brothers have apparently done very well selling tee shirts and beach towels.  They are now deeply involved in real estate with their Wings Group and have given $2 million to start a Chabad Lubavitch house in Myrtle Beach.  Is there a secret to their success?

A Wings store belonging to Shaul and Meir Levy...

and their logo, the wings of the Israeli air force.

I then raise the logical question: Were the men Olmert met, Israelis from the extreme right-wing Likud party and owners of a chain of beach stores in Florida called Wings, somehow connected to the Florida-based network of fake Israeli art students who tried to infiltrate offices of the Drug Enforcement Agency (D.E.A.) and other U.S. government offices in 1999-2001?

There is, in fact, a very remarkable connection between Dror Levy, the Israeli military "computer systems analyst" who later became the vice president and marketing director for the Levy brothers, and one of the team leaders of the Israeli "art students" casing DEA offices in Florida. The evidence suggests that the Levys, the Israelis Olmert met in New York on September 10, 2001, are part of the Israeli intelligence network in Florida.

Dror Levy and a leader of the "art students," allegedly named Hanane Sarfati, actually lived at the same address - 4220 Sheridan Street, Hollywood ( Florida ).


The Sarfati family is well known in Israel – and Colombia . Maurice Sarfati, an Israeli living in Miami, caused an international scandal in 1990 when it was discovered that he sold Israeli weapons to Colombia 's most ruthless cocaine traffickers. This weapons transfer was approved at the highest levels of the Israeli military state.

The weapons smuggler Maurice Sarfati and his family live in the same neighbourhood to this day and may be related to the Sarfati mentioned below. It is also possible that they are the same people.

Maurice Sarfati was the broker in the Israeli government's shipment in April 1989 of 500 automatic weapons through the Caribbean nation of Antigua to the boss of the Medellin Cartel, Jose Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha. The Israeli weapons were later used to assassinate the Colombian presidential candidate Luis Carlos Galan. This is the highly illegal situation which prompted the above quote from the late Rafael Eitan. As you can see by what Eitan said, this is actually quite normal business for Israel.  (They do much worse.)


The DEA report about the Israeli students says this about one of the leaders, a "Hanane Sarfati":

…The name of her "Team Leader" and/or "Boss" is Hanane SARFATI, and the name of the art school is BEZALEL. The "boss" was to pick the art students up in downtown Tampa at approximately 5:00 p.m. Additional surveillance revealed a dark-colored mini van, driven by a white male with dark hair, picking up approximately six females, all carrying similar "portfolios," in a crowded area during downtown Tampa rush hour. The Florida license plate on the van was U71 DLD, a 1991 red Dodge mini-van, registered to Hanane SARFATI, W/M, DOB 06/03/1977, 4220 Sheridan St. #303, Hollywood, FL, and 701 S. 21st Ave., Hollywood, FL. A Florida Driver's License check revealed S613-320-77-203-0 to belong to Hinane SARFATI, 4220 Sheridan St.,, #303 , Hollywood , FL. This license has been suspended and is not currently valid…

80. S/A David Keikin interviewed subject Hanan SERFATY. SERFATY stated that he served in the Israeli military between the ages of 18-21. He further indicated that he arrived in the U.S. approximately one year ago at the age of 23. When questioned as to what he did between the ages of 21 and 24, he refused to answer. The interviewing agent indicated that SERFATY's command of the English language was excellent, even the utitilization of slang words. SERFATY indicated that he resides in Hollywood , FL , with a phone number of (954) 478-1006. He further related that he purchases the paintings from an Anglo male, TOM (LNU) for $8.00-$15.00/piece, In turn, each piece of artwork is subsequently sold for $50-80. TOM (LNU) allegedly resides in Hollywood/Ft. Lauderdale area, and reportedly has a storage unit in south Florida where he keeps the artwork to be picked up.

81. It should be noted that in SERFATY's possession were deposit and withdrawal slips for Washington Mutual Bank account #038300002297689, dating, from December 19, 2000 through February 21, 2001. The fifty-one (51) slips were for transactions at various banks in Dade and Broward County , FL , banks, specifically in Coral Gables , Miami , Hollywood , Aventura, and Tamarac , The deposits for the timeframe totaled $93,252.00, with withdrawals totaling $86,000. Also in SERFATY's possession were four (4) deposit slips for First Union Bank account #1010017986436, from February 26, 2001 through March 1, 2001, totaling $14,250.

The index of Israeli suspects at the end of the report says this about Sarfati, or Serfaty:

39. SERFATY, Hanan, aka Hanane SARFATI: NADDIS negative, 4220 Sheridan St., #303 , Hollywood , FL 33.021, and 701 S. 21 Ave., Hollywood , FL , DOB 06/03/1977, 6', FL DL S613-320-77-203-0, registered owner of red mini-van FL tag # U71 DLD, phone number (954) 478-1006, cellular phone number (954) 478-0961.

What a small world Hollywood must be. Dror Levy lived at the very same house as Hanan Sarfati:

Name: Dror Levy
Address: 4200 Sheridan St
City: Hollywood
State: Florida
Zip Code: 33021-3662
Phone Number: 954-985-0851
Residence Years: 1996

There are only six phone listings for a "Dror Levy" in the United States between 1993 and 2002 and they are all in Florida:

Dror Levy Hollywood Florida 954-985-0851 1996
Dror Levy Hollywood Florida 954-435-5802 2002
Dror Levy Miami Florida 305-792-9492 1999 2000
Dror Levy Ft. Lauderdale Florida 954-472-1952 1997 - 2001
Dror Levy St. Petersburg Florida 813-360-6132 1996
Dror Levy Clearwater Beach Florida 727-466-0941 2000

Dror Levy had this address prior to 9-11:

Name: Dror Levy
Address: 3300 NE 191St St
City: Miami
State: Florida
Zip Code: 33180-2451
Phone Number: 305-792-9492
Residence Years: 1999 2000

There also happened to be another man named Sarfati who lived at this address with Dror Levy. This Sarfati had the same name of the notorious weapons smuggler. What a coincidence – or is it?

Name: Maurice Sarfati
Birth Date: 1975
Street address: 3300 NE 191st St
City: Miami
County: Miami-Dade
State: Florida
Zip Code: 33180

There is much more to this story. Who are Hanane and Maurice Sarfati and where have they gone? What has become of Dror Levy? Is he the same Dror Levy who is now a director of the Israeli-run DSP Group, Inc., headed by the son of Itzhak Shamir?

Are these Sarfatis related to the Israeli weapons smuggler, Maurice Sarfati? Is it more than a coincidence that they shared the same address as Dror Levy, the Israeli who ran Levy brothers' Wings operation in Florida?


Behind Closed Doors: Israelis Dismissed from 9/11 Trial

June 12, 2011

Court document of 26 May 2011 showing that the Israeli Mossad company that controlled passenger screening operations in Boston on 9/11 has been dismissed from the 9/11 litigation.  Why would Donald Migliori and Mary Schiavo, attorneys for the victim's family, allow this to happen?  How can it be that the company responsible for allowing armed terrorists onto the planes is not held culpable for the losses on 9/11? 

The 9/11 litigation process is incestuous business.  David Werner Sass, a senior partner of the law firm of McLaughlin & Stern (law firm for ICTS), has been a director of ICTS since 2002.  Allowing a Zionist judge to administer "justice" has resulted in gross injustices for the 9/11 relatives and the nation.  This cannot stand. 

Ehud Olmert, the disgraced former prime minister of Israel and mayor of Jerusalem, is currently fighting for his life in an Israeli court.  Olmert, a disciple of the notorious Israeli terrorist Yitzhak Shamir, was in New York City on an unexplained secret visit on 9/11.  Will the Israeli court ask him to explain the purpose of his secret trip?  Olmert, a protege of Shamir, served as minister for minority affairs from 1988-1990 (during the First Intifada) and as Minister of Health during Shamir's regime from 1986-1992. 

Olmert has a long history of criminal activity and indictments in Israel.  He is clearly one of the architects of the false-flag terrorism of 9/11 as can be seen by his secret visit to New York City on September 10-11, 2001.  When will we see U.S. authorities calling for Olmert's arrest, along with the other Zionist masterminds of 9/11?

Sources close to the 9/11 litigation informed me that International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS), the Israeli defendant in the 9/11 terrorism case, was dismissed from the lawsuit last week.  This was discussed in a document of 12 May 2011 that indicates that this move was on Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein's agenda for May 16.  The Mossad-linked company ICTS had apparently filed a motion to be dismissed from the lawsuit.  ICTS is the Israeli parent company of Huntleigh USA, the passenger screening outfit that allegedly allowed armed terrorists to board the planes in Boston on 9/11, according to the official version of events. On 26 May 2011, with the assent of attorneys for the plaintiffs, ICTS was dismissed from the 9/11 litigation.  This is completely outrageous, like all the other injustice the 9/11 relatives have suffered in the court of the Orthodox Jew Zionist Alvin K. Hellerstein.

U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein presides over all 9/11 litigation.  As a devoted Zionist Jew, Hellerstein has a fundamental conflict of interest because the key defendant in the 9/11 trial is ICTS, the Israeli company that allowed the armed terrorists to board the airplanes.  Hellerstein has a second blatant conflict of interest in that his son Joseph is a lawyer in a law firm that represents the owners of ICTS.  Hellerstein has obstructed justice for the relatives and the nation by preventing an open trial to determine who is truly responsible for the terror attacks of 9/11.

The Zionist judge Alvin K. Hellerstein discussed dismissing ICTS, the Israeli defendant in the 9/11 litigation, as this 12 May 2011 court document from the Bavis family case shows.

Judge Hellerstein has a clear conflict of interest in the 9/11 litigation.  His son Joseph is a lawyer in Israel with Amit, Pollak, and Matalon, a law firm which represents the Israeli owners of ICTS and Huntleigh USA.  In 2001, ICTS was run by a team of Israelis including the Harel brothers, Boaz and Ezra, and Menachem Atzmon.  Atzmon is a convicted Israeli criminal who was involved in illegal fund-raising for the Likud party of Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, and Menachem Begin.  Olmert was in New York City on the eve of 9/11 and probably remained to observe the crime.  Ezra Harel "died" at age 53 on a yacht off the coast of Spain in November 2003 after being indicted with his father Aryeh Mualem of serious financial fraud in Israel.  Ezra Harel reportedly owned a 65 percent controlling stake in ICTS when he left the scene.

The St. Louis company Huntleigh USA was a wholly owned subsidiary of ICTS, which had been bought by the Harel brothers, two well known financial fraudsters.  As the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported on 14 September 2001: 

Huntleigh is an odd blend of hometown business ownership and international security expertise. The U.S. subsidiary is owned by ICTS International NV, a publicly held company based in the Netherlands, which trades on the Nasdaq market in the United States. It has contracts in 50 U.S. airports and 30 airports elsewhere....

ICTS had a harder edge from its very beginning. It was founded in 1987 by former security officials of Israel's El Al airlines and bought in 1994 by Leedan, a Dutch investment holding company owned by two brothers, Ezra Harel and Boaz Harel. The former commander in chief of the Israeli air force, Amos Lapidot, is still on the board.

The following list is the directors and executives of ICTS in 2002.  Boaz Harel was Chairman of ICTS USA (1994), Inc. He was Chairman and Member of the Supervisory Board of ICTS International N.V. from March 2004 to August 2004. Prior to this, Boaz Harel was a Member of the Supervisory Board of ICTS from January 1, 1996 to November 12, 2001:

Ezra Harel (supposedly deceased 2003) 52 Chairman of the Supervisory Board
Menachem Atzmon 58 Member of the Supervisory Board
Matthew Albert Nissim 69 Member of the Supervisory Board, Secretary
Elie Housman 63 Member of the Supervisory Board
Moshe Winer 53 Member of the Supervisory Board
David W. Sass 67 Member of the Supervisory Board
Melvin F. Lazar 63 Member of the Supervisory Board and
Chairman of the Audit Committee
Lynda Davey 48 Member of the Supervisory Board
Lior Zouker 54 President and Chief Executive Officer
Joseph Yahav 46 Vice President International
Stefan Vermeulen 32 Chief Financial Officer
Doron Zicher 44 Vice President - Products & Technology


Matthew Albert Nissim was clearly a key elder partner for the Harel brothers at ICTS and before.  He had been Co-Managing Director of Leedan International Holdings and served as President of ICTS-USA (1994) Inc. since January 1994. He was also Secretary of ICTS International since January 1994. From 1994 to 1995, he served as Managing Director of ICTS International B.V.  Nissim served as President of Harel & Partners from 1991 to 1994. He has also a Director with them of Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. since September 25, 1997. He served as a Director of ICTS International NV and also served as its Member of the Supervisory Board from 2002 to December 6, 2006.

Nissim is not just an older partner with the Harel brothers, he is one of the key players in the 9/11 false-flag terrorism with other members of the Betar (Zionist militia) from China.  Shaul Eisenberg, Mossad's mega-agent in China and Japan, was also involved with the Betar brigades in China in the 1930s and 40s.  Eisenberg is the smoking gun between these Betar Likudniks from China and 9/11.  Eisenberg owned Atwell, a Mossad company that tried to get the security contract for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (World Trade Center, airports, harbors, tunnels, etc.) in 1987.  Rafi Eitan, Shalom Bendor, and Zvi Malkin were involved in this attempt to obtain the security contract for the World Trade Center.  Ehud Olmert's father and uncle were founding members of the Betar brigades in Harbin and Shanghai, China.  Matthew Albert Nissim of ICTS was born in Shanghai.  The fact that at least three architectural level players in the 9/11 attacks came from the Zionist communities of China suggests that this may be a key link between the masters of terrorism.  For more on the Mossadniks who controlled security at the World Trade Center see The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11.

There is a saying in U.S. courts that the side that gets the most evidence excluded wins.  In my trial the Zionist judge excluded all evidence that proved a conspiracy by the undercover police to injure me when they invaded my home in August 2006, and he refused to allow my expert witness to testify on the propriety of the actions taken by the police.  The judge's wife, Robin Warman Riebman, is active in the Chicago chapter of ORT America, a Zionist organization in which Stephanie Pritzker is the regional director.  Stephanie is the daughter of Michael L. Pritzker, a Chicago attorney with a documented criminal history.  Prior to becoming a director of ORT, Pritzker was an executive with the Jewish Federation/Jewish United Fund of Chicago.  The Pritzker family, owners of Hyatt Hotels, is a wealthy and powerful Zionist family from Chicago.  It is through Zionist networks like ORT that orders from higher-level Zionists can be passed to the judge through his wife.  This is exactly what happened in my case in the corrupt court of Hyman I. Riebman. 

Judge Riebman, for example, did not even sanction the police for intentionally destroying the video evidence they had made of the assault, a clear violation of police regulations.  He then allowed Michael Barber, the Hoffman Estates police officer who worked with the Department of Homeland Security, to testify on the effects and risks of using a TASER, based solely on information he had been given by TASER International.  Furthermore, it was Barber who had tortured me with a TASER while I was handcuffed and pinned to the ground with him on my back and Timothy Stoy kneeling on my temple.  On the stand both Stoy and Barber clearly lied about having given a verbal TASER warning, while none had been given.  Guess who won the battle in Riebman's court of injustice?

Hyman I. Riebman is the corrupt Cook County judge who presided over the seriously flawed Bollyn trial...

and his son Elliott is a defense attorney for former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich.  Here Blagojevich defense attorneys Aaron Goldstein, left, and Elliott Riebman are seen leaving court. 

In the trial for the family of Mark Bavis, who died on 9/11, the judge is now seeking to remove from the trial the Israeli company who was responsible for passenger screening on 9/11.  The evidence has already been removed, now Judge Hellerstein wants to remove the culprits.

The only remaining wrongful death case is Mary Bavis vs UAL Corporation, et al.  This case represents the only 9/11 trial that will ever be held and should be of great concern to all Americans.  The flagrant conflict of interest on the part of the judge cannot be ignored.  Judge Hellerstein must be removed from the case and a new process begun for all of the 9/11 families who have not been treated fairly in the tort litigation.

The simplest way to remove Judge Hellerstein is to show that his son's law firm has represented the owners of ICTS and Huntleigh USA. I am doing that with the following documents to show that Amit, Pollak, and Matalon (Joseph Z. Hellerstein is "of counsel" with Amit, Pollak, and Matalon) represents entities that include the owners of ICTS:

Amit, Pollak, and Matalon represents BOS (Better Online Solutions), Cukierman Investments, and Catalyst Fund.  Edouard Cukierman is Chairman of the Board of Directors of BOS, the founder and CEO of Catalyst Funds, and the Chairman of Cukierman & Co Investment House.

Edouard Cukierman (left) is the founder and CEO of Catalyst Funds and Chairman of Cukierman & Co Investment House.  Here he poses with his partners Yair Shamir, son of the notorious Stern Gang terrorist Yitzhak Shamir, and Boaz Harel, owner of ICTS with his brother and other Israeli criminals on 9/11.

Yair Shamir is the son of the notorious terrorist and murderer Yitzhak Shamir of the Stern Gang.  Shamir, born Icchak Jeziernicky in Ruzhany, Russia, served as prime minister of Israel from 1983-1984, and from 1986 to 1992.  It was during Shamir's reign that preparations for 9/11 were being made.  In 1987, for example, a high-level Mossad company owned by Shaul Eisenberg tried to get the security contract for the World Trade Center.  It was rejected when it was discovered that it was headed by known Israeli criminals who had stolen materials to make nuclear bombs from the United States.  Why was ICTS, a company run by convicted Israeli criminals, allowed to provide security services in U.S. airports?

Cukierman is also Chairman of the Board of BOS, a.k.a. Better Online Solutions of Israel.

Boaz Harel, co-owner (with his brother Ezra) and Chairman of ICTS International, is President & Managing Partner at Cukierman Investments.  This fact is often omitted from his biographical data but can be seen here:

 Source:  Boaz Harel, President & Managing Partner of Catalyst Fund and Cukierman Investments

The following two legal documents show that Amit, Pollak, and Matalon of Tel Aviv is on the record as being legal counsel for Cukierman, Catalyst, and BOS.  They include such statements as this, "The validity of the ordinary shares, including the ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of the note and the exercise of the warrants, will be passed upon for us by Amit, Pollak, Matalon & Co., our Israeli counsel."


It should be noted that Edouard Cukierman is also “an officer of the Israel Defense Forces Spokesman Unit”.  This shows his connection to the state of Israel and its military forces.

Edouard Cukierman is the founder and CEO of Catalyst Investments and Chairman of Cukierman & Co. Investment House. He is also on the Board of Sar-El, an Israeli Defense Forces volunteer organization. He serves as an Officer of the IDF Spokesman Unit, and is part of the Hostage & Crisis Negotiation Team (Reserves).  

Was Super Thermite in WTC Floor Ducts?

May 30, 2011

I received an interesting note from a reader in Canada who thinks that the super-thermite that pulverized the floors of the Twin Towers may have been put into wiring canals and ducts located within the 4-inch thick lightweight concrete floors.  This may very well be where the super-thermite was applied.  The diagram below show the large wiring ducts (18" x 3") that ran inside the concrete floors to contain telephone and electrical wires. 
Source: North Tower Electrical Plans


Here is the letter I received:

I was listening to Truth Jihad radio today and heard you talking about putting thermite into the paint of the WTC floor pans. I've considered that theory before and I don't think it's feasible for a number of reasons:

1) They would have to strip ALL of the fire-proofing insulation off of the floor pans first and not all of the fire proofing WAS replaced. It was only beefed up where needed.

2) They would have to go underneath, through the ceiling tile access and this would vastly disturb the tenants.

3) The exploding of this film would really only blow off insulation, blow down the ceiling tiles and would have created very brilliant flashing on all floors. Almost no explosion light was visible except in the corners of the buildings.

Here's my own theory ...

Those towers HAD to have channels in the floors for bringing in electrical and telephone lines ... on a gridwork ... so that when tenants renovated, they could put their outlets wherever they wanted, within -say- 16". They didn't bring power DOWN from the ceilings; they brought it up through the floor. That let them have open space and cubicles.

So ... MOST of these channels would be empty. Only the ones used for carrying the lines would be occupied. The rest would remain hidden under the concrete ... ready to be accessed by drilling down in specific locations (measurement by blueprint). Once opened, they could fish new lines in ... down and across or just straight down the channels.

Access to the end of these channels would be in the CORE area where the elevators were located. The sabateurs could come in at night when few people were around ... and go up into the ceiling in the core area and then blow nano-thermite into these channels or ... run it in as a liquid/plastic slurry. They could virtually fill the floors with this explosive without ever disturbing the tenant spaces. (but the tenants might notice dust settled on surfaces that would come out of the electrical outlets on the floors from this pressured filling).

The core box columns could have been loaded INTERNALLY with thermite by going up into the hat truss area and lowering strings of spaced thermite down into them. This would hide the bright flaring of the thermite as well.

The difficult part would be the building corners. I've not come up with a theory on how they could place explosives or cutting charges there ... because the external colums were made in H sections and then butt-bolted together. The internal columns were hollow from top to bottom but the external colums had these butt-joints which would prevent putting anything down them.

Anyway, all they needed to do was cut the corner support for the buildings. The exploding floors would then automatically kick out the outside walls.

And ...

How did they manage to control the explosives from outside? They had renovated the fire alarm system and were in stage 3 of the renovations -(the port authority having ordered a bunch of new equipment in 1998).

The new fire alarm system was "addressable" and could be run from a central command station ... like the internet works. The signals don't go by individual wires; they go on common wires but get allocated by packet addressing. That allows virtually thousands of devices to be addressed individually ... including explosives.

Check out the fire alarm systems on that day and you find that none of them worked as they should. Building #7 had its fire alarm system TOTALLY shut down for the day. 

The ductwork in the floors of the Twin Towers may have been "wired" with super thermite.

Who Sold the 9/11 Steel for Scrap?

May 27, 2011

Andrew J. Naporano, the former president of Metal Management Northeast (formerly Naporano Iron and Metal Co. of Newark, New Jersey), was a consultant involved in selling the structural steel and ferrous and non-ferrous scrap from the World Trade Center after 9/11.  The effort to recycle the steel was actually criminal destruction of crucial evidence from the crime scene.  The hasty destruction of the steel evidence was thinly disguised as a recovery and clean-up operation.  Destroying the evidence was an intrinsic part of the false-flag terror atrocity of 9/11, a crime of historic proportions.

Andrew J. Naporano

I contacted Mr. Naporano while researching my chapter on the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.  Although he did not provide any information at the time, when I finished the two final chapters I sent him a note with links to the material.  He wrote back to me and included a MS Word document, which is his "World Trade Center Job Summary Report" dated August 6, 2002. 

I will post Mr. Naporano's report as a link in the endnotes of the chapter on the destruction of the steel. 
His report is a very interesting and important document which fills in some of the blanks by providing information about how the steel evidence was handled and who was behind the destruction of this crucial evidence.  It clarifies a few key points and raises a few questions.


Nearly 300,000 tons of structural steel were expected to be recovered from the remains of the World Trade Center but fewer than 200,000 tons were actually found in this form.

In Naporano's report the estimates given for the amount of structural steel from the World Trade Center are between 276,800 net tons (LERA) and 309,000 net tons (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers).  As I mention in my chapter, the estimate considered most accurate was that about 280,000 tons of structural steel should have been found in the pile of rubble.

When all was said and done, a total of 198,416 tons of structural steel was recovered and sold as scrap, according to Naporano.  This is a discrepancy of at least 80,000 tons of structural steel, a difference of about 30 percent.  That is to say that almost one third of the structural steel from the World Trade Center was not accounted for in the recovery effort.  What could have happened to the missing 80,000 tons of structural steel? 

These hot dust clouds of pulverized concrete contained a large amount of the steel from the floor pans that had been melted and converted into tiny balls of molten iron by super-thermite.

Tiny chips of a bi-layered coating of super-thermite were found in the dust by Dr. Steven E. Jones.  This explosive coating has more energy per gram than any other explosive used in demolition.

Naporano says that the New York City Department of Sanitation (DOS) received 1,457,703 tons of debris, which he estimated may have contained between 2-5 percent scrap steel.  Steel scrap found in this debris would have been shipped to the Jersey City junkyard of Hugo Neu, which had the scrap steel contract with the DOS.  While we don't know how much structural steel was eventually recovered from the DOS debris, even at the highest estimate of 5 percent it would not account for all the missing steel.

What we do know, however, is that a very large amount of structural steel was melted instantly when the thermitic explosive coating was detonated.  This can be seen by the very large amount of iron spheroids found in the dust.  These balls of molten iron came from either thermite-melted structural steel or the thermite itself.  Large amounts of structural steel, such as the 220 acre-size steel floor pans, were melted during the explosive demolitions.  The concrete floors were pulverized by a coating of super-thermite, fragments of which were later found in the dust.

A large amount of structural steel was converted into tiny spheres of molten iron when the thermitic coating was detonated, destroying the steel floor pans and pulverizing the 220 concrete floors of the Twin Towers.

Tons of molten iron poured from the South Tower minutes before it collapsed.  Government-funded researchers were unable to explain how tons of molten iron could have been produced by burning jet fuel.  Molten iron and white smoke (aluminum oxide), like we see here, are the products of a thermitic reaction, which releases a great deal of heat.


Naporano was the consultant for the sales of the steel but he was not in charge.  He explains that the Port Authority (the owner of the World Trade Center) "was overseeing my work."  The Port Authority was then headed by Chairman Lewis M. Eisenberg.  Chairman Eisenberg was the key person to approve the bids from the seven junkyards bidding on the steel.  Eisenberg chose three junkyards to receive the evidence from the crime:  Metal Management Northeast, Hugo Neu Schnitzer East, and the smaller Blandford.  All three companies are controlled by Zionists.  

Lewis Eisenberg, Chairman of the Port Authority in 2001

Eisenberg remained in the key position as chairman of the Port Authority until the end of the 2001.  Eisenberg played a key role in the setting up of the 9/11 terror attacks and in the "clean up" after the explosive demolitions in which nearly 3,000 people were murdered.  Eisenberg chose who would get the lease for the towers (the Zionist agents Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy) and to whom the structural steel would be sold when the towers were destroyed six weeks later. 

Naporano's report says, "Finally, approval was given to sell to a limited number of buyers (2). (The list was expanded on subsequent bids)."  The three bidders who were chosen by Eisenberg were Metals Management, Inc., Hugo Neu Schnitzer, and Blandford Land Development.  These three companies received a total of 198,416 tons of structural steel from the World Trade Center.  Blandford received the smallest amount, 23,289 tons, while MTLM received 77,832 tons.  Hugo Neu got 97,305 tons of structural steel plus whatever steel was recovered from the debris taken away by the Department of Sanitation plus 150,748 tons of "other ferrous."  All told, Hugo Neu received more than 250,000 tons of ferrous scrap from the World Trade Center.


At the end of Naporano's report he says that the ferrous scrap (steel and iron) from Ground Zero brought in $4,269,437.  While scrap prices were low in 2001 (about $70-80 per ton) we can see that the steel scrap from the World Trade Center was sold to the selected junkyards very cheaply.  The total amount of structural steel and ferrous scrap from Ground Zero was 356,984 tons, which was sold for less than $4.3 million.  This means the World Trade Center steel was sold (on average) for less than $12 per ton.  The junkyards then reportedly sold the steel to mills in Asia for $120 per ton - about 10 times more than they paid for it.  What a deal.   

Lastly, Naporano's report raises the issue of discrepancies with the displacement surveys of the barges carrying the steel to the junkyards.  He found that there was a consistent discrepancy of about 5 percent with the displacement tables used to estimate the weight of steel loaded into the DOS barges.  This discrepancy "resulted in the city receiving 95 percent of the value" of the steel sold.  The flawed displacement tables that resulted in the city being cheated out of 5 percent of every load had been provided by Peter Kelman, the marine surveyor for Hugo Neu.  Peter's son, Robert Kelman, was running Hugo Neu's steel recycling operation as the company's general manager.

The weight of the steel being sold was determined by displacement tables that Naporano found to be flawed.  The tables came from Peter Kelman, the marine surveyor and partner of Hugo Neu, the largest recipient of WTC steel.

Naporano raised the issue of investigating the displacement tables provided by Kelman.  "Although initially approved, the idea of investigating the DOS displacement tables was then revoked, so I was not able to get to the bottom of the issue", Naporano concluded. 

Naporano's report, which I assume to be correct and true, indicates that Peter Kelman of Hugo Neu had provided flawed displacement tables that short-changed the seller of the steel by 5 percent.  It also indicates that about one third of the structural steel from the World Trade Center is not accounted for under that heading.  A very large amount of structural steel seems to have gone up in smoke and was later found in the dust in the form of tiny droplets of molten iron.  Finally, Naporano's report indicates who was behind choosing the junkyards that received the steel from the World Trade Center - and how cheaply they got it.

Andrew Naporano seems to be an honest man who wound up working with a gang of criminals involved in destroying the steel from the World Trade Center.  His son served as a U.S. Navy pilot and flew more than 100 missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.  It is most ironic that Mr. Naporano was involved in the destruction of evidence, which would have revealed the truth of what happened to the Twin Towers if it had been properly examined.  If the steel had been sorted and stored (Naporano's Option No. 2), it would have been scrutinized by steel experts who would have discovered the real cause of the explosive demolitions that killed 3,000 people.  Had the crucial steel evidence been treated properly by the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI, the younger Naporano would have never been sent on bombing missions in Afghanistan and Iraq and we would be living in a more just and secure world today.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Hugo Neu and the Giuliani Partners Who Destroyed the Steel of 9/11", 18 April 2011

Final Chapters of Solving 9/11 Published

May 20, 2011


The final and conclusive chapters of
Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World have been published on  I am pleased to be able to release these concluding chapters of the book on the day that U.S. President Barack Obama meets with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

These two chapters are the fifteenth and sixteenth chapters of the book and deal with the 9/11 cover up and the destruction of the crucial evidence.

The chapters can be read, downloaded, and printed by clicking on the URL links following their titles.

Chapter XV - The Destruction of the Evidence

Chapter XVI - Making Sense of the 9/11 Cover Up 

Calling the FBI on Criminal Destruction of Steel Evidence from 9/11

May 11, 2011

In my quest to find who is responsible for the destruction of the crucial steel evidence from the World Trade Center I have turned to two of the key people involved in the FBI investigation of 9/11, code-named PENTTBOM – FBI Director Robert Swan Mueller III and Pasquale “Pat” D’Amuro, Inspector in Charge of the investigation.  Mueller is still director of the FBI, until September, and D'Amuro works for Giuliani Partners in New York.

See:  "Hugo Neu and the Giuliani Partners Who Destroyed the Steel of 9/11"

Robert S. Mueller, Director of the FBI
(September 7, 2001-September 2011)

The subject of its latest cover story, TIME asks:  "Has FBI Director Bob Mueller fixed the bureau that blew 9/11?"  The article notes that "Mueller ran the largest criminal investigation in FBI history" but ignores the fact that he allowed the crucial steel evidence from the World Trade Center to be destroyed without being examined.  Mueller's negligence was not the result of ineptitude, but a criminal conspiracy at the Department of Justice to destroy the evidence that could expose the people behind the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.

My attempt to reach Director Mueller brought me in contact with Paul Bresson, head of the FBI's public affairs office at bureau headquarters in Washington.  I called his office and sent him the following email on 10 May 2011:

From: Christopher Bollyn
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011
To: Bresson, Paul E.
Subject: Press Question on Destruction of WTC Steel

Dear Mr. Bresson,

I am an independent journalist working on an article about the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. As I said on the telephone message, I don't understand why the FBI allowed the steel from the WTC, some 280,000 tons, to be hastily recycled via the two junkyards in New Jersey. Why did the FBI allow the agencies of New York City to take control of this crucial evidence? Can you explain this?

Since the FBI led the PENTTBOM investigation and had special investigative jurisdiction over the 9/11 crime scenes, the FBI should be able to explain why they allowed the steel to be destroyed without it being scrutinized by steel experts.

Because Robert S. Mueller was the director of the FBI at the time, I would like to have a comment from him about how and why this decision was made. 

Thank you for your consideration of my request.
I then received the following response from Mr. Bresson:

From: Bresson, Paul E.
Paul dot Bresson at ic dot fbi dot gov
Subject: RE: Press Question on Destruction of WTC Steel
Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Mr. Bollyn,

I don’t know if this is accurate or how crucial steel is/was to the investigation. In any case, I would check with FBI in New York or NYPD for anything further. 

I responded to Bresson on 11 May 2011, as follows:

Dear Mr. Bresson,

Thank you for your prompt response. I am afraid that there is some misunderstanding here.  I am writing to you as a journalist with questions about the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. I was told that because I am an author working on a research article that my questions about the FBI's role in the investigation should go through you.

You wrote that you don't know how crucial the steel was to the investigation? Are you a trained criminal investigator? If you were I would be shocked to hear such a comment, so I assume you are not. How can the evidence remaining at the World Trade Center crime scene in which nearly 3,000 people were murdered NOT be crucial to the investigation? It is certainly obvious that the remains of the collapsed towers should be examined to determine HOW they collapsed. Is this not clear to you, Mr. Bresson? 

The first part of my article on this subject is here. Please forward it to Director Robert Mueller:

With all due respect, Mr. Bresson, I am really not interested in your opinion. I am going through your office, as directed by a person at the press desk at FBI HQ, in my quest for comments from people who were directly involved in this historic investigation, in this case, Director Robert S. Mueller III and Pasquale D'Amuro, the Inspector in Charge of the PENTTBOM investigation.

Please let me know if you can help me with this. If you cannot, please direct me to the person who can. Thank you for your prompt consideration of my request.

Christopher Bollyn

The 9/11 Cover Up - The Destruction of the Steel Evidence

Updated - May 5, 2011
(Added material on Olmert connection to Eisenberg and Zionist terror groups)

"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming."
—Dick Cheney, "Interview of the Vice President by Tony Snow", March 29, 2006

For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow boat to China, perhaps never to be seen again in America until you buy your next car. … The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.
- Bill Manning, “Selling Out the Investigation”, Fire Engineering, January 2002

My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse…It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that.
- Van Romero, explosion expert, “Explosives Planted In Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says”, Albuquerque Journal, 11 September 2001

 The explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers pulverized all 220 concrete floors leaving nothing but steel and dust.  The dust contained large amounts of molten iron and a sophisticated form of thermite made using nanotechnology.  Thermite creates molten iron when it reacts.

 "The concrete was literally pulverized; all you're left with is steel and dust," said Robert Kelman of Hugo Neu about the rubble of the World Trade Center.  Because the remaining steel could reveal how the Twin Towers were destroyed, the architects of terror had set up a secure network to destroy this crucial evidence before it could be examined.


The terror atrocity of 9/11 is a wicked criminal deception that is not meant to be solved, which is why sincere efforts to solve the crime, like mine, encounter such vicious opposition. 9/11 is a textbook example of an elaborate criminal deceit known as "false-flag terrorism" in which the perpetrators designed the crime and spent years preparing the atrocity with the intention that a targeted group, in this case Osama Bin Laden and his nebulous band of Islamic fighters, Al Qaida, would be wrongly blamed. In an act of false-flag terrorism, placing the blame on the targeted entity is the primary motive for the crime. For an act of false-flag terrorism to succeed it is essential that crucial evidence be removed and destroyed to protect the fraud, and the criminals behind it, from being exposed. The destruction of the evidence and the promotion of the deception are intrinsic parts of the crime. The people behind the destruction of the 9/11 evidence are equal partners in crime along with the terrorists who planned and executed the attacks. 

The main purpose of the 9/11 terror spectacle was to shock and scare the nation to sway public opinion to support the preplanned Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" and the U.S.-led invasion and occupation of Afghanistan. In the aftermath of the terror atrocity the unproven assertion that Al Qaida was behind the attacks became political dogma, the unchallengeable "party line" of both parties – and the controlled press. Although there were clearly a number of serious problems with the explanation that Al Qaida was behind the attacks, such as the unexplained explosive demolitions of the three towers at the World Trade Center, these issues were never discussed in the mainstream media. By ignoring the many unanswered questions about 9/11 the masters of the controlled media sought to marginalize those who pointed out the glaring problems with the “politically correct” explanation that blamed Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida.
The real masterminds of 9/11 designed the attacks to be a shocking spectacle of terror that would profoundly affect the American psyche and change the general perception of the Middle East. In order to scare the public and subjugate reason to fear, the architects of terror employed the psychological tactic of war known as “shock and awe.” The explosions that accompanied the aircraft crashing into the towers and the apocalyptic scenes of the buildings' collapses were meant to create frightening images of “Islamic terrorism” to be seared into the consciousness of every American.

The 9/11 attacks employed a tactic of psychological warfare known as "Shock and Awe."
The attacks had to be seen as being the work of Arab Muslim terrorists in order for the terror deception to succeed and achieve the desired effect on public opinion. It was essential that the blame be put on the targeted scapegoat as quickly as possible to preclude any serious doubts or questions being raised about who was behind the atrocity. Getting the interpretation desired by the terror masterminds to the global public required having “terrorism experts" such as Ehud Barak, the Israeli commando leader-cum-prime minister, ready in a BBC television studio in London immediately after the attacks to present a plausible explanation blaming Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida - and calling for U.S. intervention in Afghanistan. The Israeli military chief's interpretation, the first to accuse Osama Bin Laden, was bolstered by bits of incriminating evidence such as the pristine passport of an alleged Arab hijacker “found” near the rubble of the World Trade Center and a terrorist handbook on how to hijack airplanes supposedly left behind in one of the terrorists’ rental cars.
Although the government collected all the evidence from the 9/11 crime scenes, including confiscated video tapes, black boxes, pieces of the aircraft, and human remains, it has never presented any evidence to identify the aircraft or support its assertion that Al Qaida was responsible for the attacks. It was, therefore, based on nothing more than fabricated evidence, but with the controlled media and public opinion solidly behind him, that President George W. Bush invaded Afghanistan in October 2001.
If the government had real evidence that would conclusively prove its case for waging war, why has it not presented the evidence in a federal court after 10 years? The only logical explanation for this failure is that the government does not have any solid evidence to support its allegations.  Vice President Dick Cheney admitted as much in an interview with Tony Snow on 29 March 2006:  "We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming."  It has been argued that Cheney made a slip of the tongue, but it is a matter of fact that evidence linking Osama bin Laden to 9/11 has never been forthcoming.
If the attacks were truly carried out by Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida there would be no reason to hide any of the evidence because it should serve to corroborate and confirm the official version. If, on the other hand, 9/11 was a false-flag terror deception it would be absolutely imperative for the perpetrators to confiscate and destroy any evidence that could disprove their interpretation of events and expose their fraud.
This is exactly what happened when, for example, agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) confiscated video recordings from privately-owned cameras overlooking the Pentagon. These video tapes have never been shown to the public. Likewise, the FBI collected many numbered aircraft parts which could identify the specific plane they came from, yet none of these parts has ever been presented to support the official version. The failure of the government to use the evidence in its possession to prove its version suggests that the aircraft used in the 9/11 attacks were not the planes that are said to have been involved.

Why has the FBI not presented the numbered parts from this engine that would identify the specific aircraft it came from?  
Understanding that 9/11 is an act of false-flag terrorism is the first step in comprehending the nature of the crime and identifying the real perpetrators. This is not an easy task because it requires thinking counter-intuitively about the crime and looking at it from a completely different angle than how it has been explained by the government and controlled media. This is very difficult for people who have a great deal of trust invested in what the government and media say. It also means understanding that the criminal cover up and destruction of evidence continued long after the attacks.
Finding those responsible for the destruction of the evidence requires investigating a most unlikely set of suspects, including current and former officials of the U.S. government, law enforcement, and military, and ascribing to them criminal behavior quite unlike what one would expect of such people. This means recognizing that the highest officials in the Department of Justice, for example, whose obligation it was to investigate the crime and prosecute those responsible, actually oversaw the confiscation and destruction of crucial evidence.
A proper criminal investigation has to begin with and proceed from the evidence. Any inquiry that does not examine and consider all the evidence is not an investigation, but a fraud. Rather than a federal investigation of 9/11, there was a "non-investigation" that allowed crucial evidence, such as the structural steel from the World Trade Center, to be destroyed before it could be examined. Instead of solving the crime and bringing those responsible to justice, people in positions of power participated in a criminal conspiracy to destroy the evidence and obstruct justice.
One of the clearest indications that 9/11 was an act of false-flag terrorism is that during the ten years after the attacks not a single victim's lawsuit has gone to trial, although peripheral “terrorist” cases that did not require proving the official version have been tried. Likewise, although the government claims to have Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged "Mastermind of 9/11", in detention, in April 2011 the Obama administration abruptly reneged on its promise to try the 9/11 suspects in an open court and announced that the accused terrorists would be processed in a closed military tribunal in Guantanamo, Cuba.
If the government had evidence that could prove the veracity of its charges, why has it obstructed justice and refused to let a single 9/11 lawsuit go to trial?  For years after the attacks government officials defended the concealment of the evidence saying that pending lawsuits required such secrecy, but after ten years there still has not been a trial to determine who was really responsible for the attacks and there is scant hope there ever will be.
Alvin K. Hellerstein, the federal judge in Manhattan who has overseen the 9/11 litigation, has effectively blocked any trial for the relatives that would address the question of culpability for the terror attacks that changed America – and the world. In a judicial war of attrition against the families of the 9/11 victims, all of the families, with only one exception, were pushed into accepting out-of-court settlements, which prevent them from being part of any further litigation. The family of 9/11 victim Mark Bavis is the last family standing of the nearly 100 families that chose to litigate to determine who is responsible for 9/11 rather than accept the government payout. Judge Hellerstein has stated that he intends to severely limit the time allowed for the Bavis family lawyers to only 50 hours, a most unusual and arbitrary limit to be imposed on a trial of such importance.
Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty.
- George W. Bush, at the United Nations, 11 November 2001

The "guilty", according to the U.S. government:  A U.S. "Psy-Ops" pamphlet from Afghanistan.  Similar psychological operations blaming Osama Bin Laden for 9/11 and pushing fear over reason were carried out on the U.S. population.
The Bush administration's explanation that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida were responsible for the 9/11 atrocity led directly to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan on 7 October 2001. The invasion was authorized by a joint resolution of the U.S. Congress on 14 September 2001, opposed by only one representative. The war resolution, known as "The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists", granted President Bush the authority to use all "necessary and appropriate force" against those whom he determined "planned, authorized, committed or aided" the attacks, or who harbored said persons or groups. Although the U.S. has been at war in Afghanistan since October 2001, it has never actually been proven that Al Qaida was responsible for the attacks.
The controlled media and government officials who protected and promoted the unproven version that Al Qaida carried out the attacks are all part of the 9/11 deception. Cognizant that the government and media were deceiving the public about what really happened on 9/11, I pursued my quest to identify the real perpetrators of the terror spectacle that brought us the "War on Terror" – and a decade of deception and war.
According to the U.S. indictment against the alleged terrorists, there were 2,976 "murder victims" on 9/11, of whom about 93 percent were murdered at the World Trade Center. This includes the 147 people said to have been on the two airliners that struck the buildings plus the 2,605 victims trapped in the towers when they were demolished. This makes the demolition of the Twin Towers the largest case of mass murder in U.S. history, but that's not how it was handled by the authorities of the federal government or New York City.
What is most appalling about the 9/11 case is how the most crucial evidence from the crime scene was confiscated and destroyed before it could be properly examined. While it was quite clear to many people (and explosion experts like Van Romero) that the steel-framed Twin Towers did not simply collapse due to burning jet fuel, this unproven and most unlikely explanation was accepted without question by the officials responsible for the criminal investigation.  While the Federal Bureau of Investigation was supposedly investigating the crime, it was actually allowing the steel from the World Trade Center to be cut up into small pieces and exported to Asian smelters – before it could be examined.
The officials who oversaw the investigation at the World Trade Center certainly knew it was wrong to dispose of evidence from the crime scene before it had been properly examined. The fact that the highest officials at the Department of Justice and the FBI allowed the structural steel to be destroyed without been examined indicates that a high-level criminal conspiracy was at work to prevent it from becoming forensic evidence. The conspiracy to destroy the steel is an intrinsic part of the 9/11 crime because it was absolutely essential to prevent the discovery of who and what had caused the murderous demolition of the towers.
The spectacular explosive demolitions that pulverized the 220 concrete floors of the Twin Towers from the top down were evidently accomplished using an extremely powerful explosive form of "super thermite". A sophisticated bi-layered coating of super thermite had evidently been applied to surfaces inside the towers, particularly on the undersides of the floor pans. When the explosive thermitic coating was detonated it pulverized the 4-inch thick concrete floors and the steel pans that held them. The intense heat released by the alumino-thermic reaction melted the steel pans, creating billions of tiny molten iron droplets that fell like burning hail from the apocalyptic clouds that rolled across lower Manhattan.

The demolition of the Twin Towers created billions of tiny droplets of molten iron that are not explained by the government-funded research.
The abundance of iron-rich spheroids in the dust of the destroyed towers is not explained in the U.S. Geological Survey's published study or by the government-funded research that concluded that burning jet fuel caused the towers to collapse. A fire of burning jet fuel, however, does not produce temperatures anywhere near the melting point of steel and cannot explain the presence of the large amount of molten iron found in the dust and rubble.
The discovery of fragments of unexploded super thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center by Dr. Steven E. Jones, on the other hand, explains both the pulverization of the concrete floors and the abundance of molten iron droplets in the dust. Conventional thermite cutter charges were apparently used to slice the massive core columns that held up the towers. Numerous eyewitnesses, including a reporter from the BBC, reported powerful explosions at the base of the towers long before the collapses occurred. None of this evidence of explosions, even from reporters on the scene, has been taken into account by the government or the controlled media.
Steel is said to have a memory because when it is exposed to explosions or extreme heat its structure is affected. Because explosions and thermite leave permanent telltale signs on steel, the real masterminds of 9/11 had arranged a network in advance to manage the quick recovery and hasty destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center – before it could be examined by experts. 


"By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Make War" is the official motto of the Mossad. "Tahvulot" in Hebrew is better translated as "with tricks" than as "way of deception", and is deeply related to the modern word for "terrorism."
- Ro'i Tov,
The Cross of Bethlehem

Consistency is close to being the mark of a set of true beliefs; it is at least rationally compelling.
- Robin Waterfield, Gorgias by Plato, Oxford University Press 2008

Mindful of the early evidence of Israeli involvement in the terror attacks and cognizant of the hypothesis that 9/11 was an elaborate false-flag deception carried out by Israeli military intelligence and Zionist agents in high places, I pursued my investigation. Having found Israeli nationals and dedicated Zionists at every key point of the 9/11 matrix, I expected to find Zionist agents involved in the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. When I discovered that the scrapyard that managed the destruction of most of the steel had employed a team of metal traders sent by a high-level agent of the Mossad to dispose of the steel by sending it to Asian smelters, I was not surprised because it was consistent with what I had expected.  Consistency is indeed the mark of a set of true beliefs.

In January 1999 the Business Wire reported that two scrap iron traders who worked for Marc Rich and his renamed company, Glencore AG, were being sent to New York to create an international trading division at Hugo Neu Schnitzer East, the scrap metal company who managed the destruction of the lion's share of the steel from the World Trade Center. Marc Rich, and his lieutenant Ivan Glasenberg, CEO of Glencore International, are both Israeli citizens with close ties to the Mossad. The head of the Marc Rich Foundation in Israel is a former Mossad operative named Avner Azulay (also spelled Azoulai). 

Avner Azulay runs the Marc Rich Foundation from Shaul Eisenberg's Asia House in Tel Aviv.

Shaul Nehemia Eisenberg worked closely with the Japanese military training Betar and Irgun terrorists during World War II.  Mordechai Olmert, the father of Ehud Olmert, was one of the founders of Betar and Irgun terrorist organizations in China and Palestine and worked closely with Eisenberg.

Mordechai Olmert started the Betar chapter in Harbin, China, and was one of the founders of the Zionist terrorist gang known as the Irgun.  After leaving China in 1930, Mordechai and his wife Bella Vugman spent three years in Holland before moving to Palestine in 1933.  For 14 years he and his wife Bella were active in "missions" for the terrorist organization, the Irgun Zva’i Le’umi (Ezel).  He then returned to China to raise funds for the Irgun. (Source: "Jews of Harbin", by Dr. Irena Vladimirsky) 

Ehud Olmert, then Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem, was in New York City on 9/11 on Betar business, a fact that has never been discussed in the controlled media.  Olmert, who became prime minister after Ariel Sharon was put into a coma, was born in Palestine and raised in the Betar Youth Organization.  His parents were among the founders of the terrorist Irgun. In 1947, Mordechai, who spoke Chinese having lived in Harbin from 1919-1930, was sent to China by Menachem Begin, the Chief Commander of the Ezel (Irgun), to raise funds for the Irgun ship Altalena.

The Marc Rich Foundation in Israel is run by Azulay working out of Shaul Eisenberg’s Asia House in Tel Aviv. Eisenberg is the mega Mossad operative owner of Israel Corp., ZIM shipping, ATASCO, and hundreds of ventures in Asia, including Atwell Security, the Mossad company that obtained the security contract for the World Trade Center in the 1980s. (See Chapter 2, "The Planes of 9/11")

Shaul Eisenberg's Asia House in Tel Aviv, the center of many Israeli connections to 9/11.

Shaul Eisenberg left Germany in 1939 and moved to the Far East, making his primary bases of operation Japanese-occupied Shanghai and Japan itself.  In Shanghai, Eisenberg, along with Imperial Japanese military intelligence units, formed units of future Jewish terrorist groups - the Irgun and the Shanghai Betar. The Irgun and Betar gangs used the knowledge gained from the Japanese in their terror campaign against British and Arab forces in Palestine following World War II.

Eventually, Irgun and Betar veterans would form the present-day Likud Party, now headed by Binyamin Netanyahu, a noted extreme right-winger. After the war, Eisenberg began selling iron and steel scrap. Married to a Japanese woman who converted to Judaism, Eisenberg established the Israel Corporation, a huge holding company, which, during the 1970s, began to secretly export Israeli military equipment and weapons to China. Under a Panama-based company called United Development, Inc., Eisenberg began exporting weapons to Central America's most insidious dictatorships, including that of Anastasio Somoza in Nicaragua. Eisenberg's vast holdings eventually included Israel Aircraft Industries and Zim Israel Navigation Company.

Azulay was a Mossad operative in Lebanon during Israel's invasion in 1982. In Lebanon, Azulay worked closely with Ariel Sharon, the Minister of Defense who carried out the murderous invasion. The prime minister at the time was Menachem Begin, the former head of the terrorist Irgun group, which later became the Likud party.

The two New Jersey junkyards who handled most of the steel from the World Trade Center were the final links in a secure system arranged by the Zionist masterminds behind 9/11 to destroy the crucial evidence. The highest agent in this system was Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. The FBI has special investigative jurisdiction in crimes of terrorism, and Chertoff, an Israeli national and son of a Mossad agent, was the senior official who oversaw the FBI investigation and the collection of evidence.

Michael Chertoff, the head of the criminal division of the Department of Justice, oversaw the FBI investigation of 9/11 and collection of evidence.

Because it was Chertoff’s responsibility to oversee the gathering of the evidence from the crime scenes of 9/11, I first turned to him to ask if he had authorized the destruction of the steel. Chertoff wrote back saying, “No.”  Asked if he knew who had, Chertoff said, “No idea.”  If the criminal destruction of the evidence from the World Trade Center were to be prosecuted as it should be, Chertoff should be charged with criminal negligence because it was his official duty to oversee the proper collection and protection of evidence to prosecute those behind 9/11.

Chertoff's abdication of his responsibility and the failure of the FBI to protect the steel evidence allowed officials of New York City to oversee the removal and disposal of evidence from the crime scene. As head of the criminal division of the Department of Justice, Chertoff had authority over the FBI investigation. Under the guise of the “clean-up” of the rubble, Chertoff allowed the control of the crucial steel evidence to devolve upon an agency of the city of New York headed by an official appointed by Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
Richard J. Sheirer, then commissioner of Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management (OEM), was the local official who was given complete authority over the “clean-up” at the World Trade Center. As New York magazine of 15 October 2001 reported:

Since September 11, Sheirer has taken charge of the biggest clean-up effort in American history, coordinating 100 federal, state, and local agencies, including FEMA. He's become, in effect, the CEO of a company with thousands of workers and a budget that could run up to $40 billion -- or, if you prefer, the mayor of the hot zone..."OEM is in charge," says Mike Byrne, deputy federal coordinating officer of FEMA for this incident. "Sheirer gives the marching orders. So far, we're blown away by OEM's performance."
Sheirer delegated the handling of the steel to an agency under his command, the Department of Design and Construction (DDC), headed by Kenneth Holden. When Holden gave his statement to the 9/11 Commission on April 1, 2003, he said that he had received "verbal permission" to send the steel to scrap yards in New Jersey, but failed to name the person who had authorized the removal. Seeing that Richard Sheirer of the OEM was in charge of the clean-up and giving “marching orders” to the DDC, it is logical to assume that it was Sheirer who authorized the removal of the steel to the two junkyards in New Jersey, Hugo Neu and Metal Management Northeast, where it was cut into small pieces, mixed with other scrap, and shipped to Asian smelters.
Hugo Neu and Metal Management Northeast were the final links in the closed system that was set up by the terror masterminds to ensure the secure destruction of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center. In three easy steps from the FBI to the junkyard, the control of the crucial steel evidence passed from one Zionist-controlled agency to the next until it was destroyed in the smelters of Asian steel companies. 

Hugo Neu “played a pivotal role as the principal recycler of steel from the World Trade Center,” the company says about its role in the destruction of the steel. Robert A. Kelman, then senior vice president and general manager of Hugo Neu, told the Associated Press in 2002 that his company had handled 250,000 tons of trade center scrap and had shipped it to 11 countries, including Malaysia, China, South Korea, and Japan.
Each of the towers contained about 78,000 tons of recyclable steel. Frank Lombardi, chief engineer for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which built the World Trade Center and owned six of the seven buildings (except Larry Silverstein's WTC 7), said the rubble contained an estimated 285,000 tons of steel. This would mean that Hugo Neu processed about 88 percent of the steel from the World Trade Center.
Less than a month after 9/11, James Glanz of the New York Times reported how Kelman's company was hastily cutting up the steel, destroying the crucial evidence that could reveal how the World Trade Center had been demolished:

When it reached the Port Authority pier, the Kathleen dropped off the loaded barge, picked up one of three waiting empty barges and immediately headed back to Pier 6 in Manhattan. A second tug would pick up the steel and tow it to one of two scrap recyclers, either Metal Management of Newark or Hugo Neu Schnitzer East.

The docks at Hugo Neu Schnitzer East, in the Claremont Channel in Jersey City, reveal the next leg of the journey. With a clear view of the altered skyline of Manhattan, a grappler on steel treads lifts beams out of another blue sanitation barge and adds it to a pile of wreckage that already stretches some 600 feet, reaching 30 or 40 feet high in places...

A few steps from the grappler, a team of men with torches were already cutting beams into pieces five or six feet long. It is in that form that the material will be sent to steelmakers who will melt it down in huge ovens to make new products.

A grappler and magnet at Hugo Neu's Jersey City junkyard
Kelman said Hugo Neu had a work force of nearly one hundred people working on the scrap metal from the World Trade Center, including 25 workers assigned to girder cutting, working around the clock in twelve-hour shifts. Kelman told the AP that the steel from the Twin Towers was sliced into pieces with industrial guillotines or blow torches and thrown in with other scrap before being shipped to smelters in Asia. Alan Ratner, president of Metal Management Northeast, the second junkyard processing the steel, said his firm had 40 to 60 people working on the job.
The people at Hugo Neu and Metal Management Northeast were obviously engaged in a hasty effort to cut up the steel, mix it with other scrap, and export it to distant Asian smelters. The real purpose behind this effort was to prevent the steel from being properly examined and becoming evidence that could expose the real cause of the explosive demolition that claimed nearly 2,800 lives. The crucial roles played by Hugo Neu and Metal Management in the recycling of the steel did not happen by accident but were part of a well organized plan to ensure the destruction of the evidence from the World Trade Center.
Having contacted the key players involved in the destruction of the steel, I have not found one that is willing to discuss the subject. I have, therefore, relied primarily on press articles and other information in the public domain to try to piece together the arrangement by which this critical part of the 9/11 cover up was carried out. 

Knowing there would be a huge amount of structural steel remaining after the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers, the terror masterminds put in place a network to manage the destruction of the steel, the solid evidence that could expose their crime. One scrap metal dealer, Hugo Neu Schnitzer East of Jersey City, already had the contract with New York City to recycle steel from the Fresh Kills dump on Staten Island, where the first truckloads of steel from the World Trade Center were taken. Hugo Neu reportedly wound up processing some 250,000 tons, nearly 90 percent of the steel from the rubble, by cutting it up into pieces shorter than 60 inches, mixing it with other scrap, and sending it to Asian steel mills.
The second generation German-Jewish scrap dealer was certainly well prepared to handle the massive job. In August 2001, Hugo Neu was engaged in a private-public project to dredge the narrow, two-mile Claremont Channel that ships used to reach its yard. The channel, which was only 10 feet deep in places, was dredged to a depth of 34 feet. Because the dredging was done to improve shipping for Hugo Neu, the company paid $24 million while the New Jersey Office of Maritime Resources paid $20.5 million. The dredging allowed larger ships to load at Hugo Neu's Claremont facility, which is exactly what was required to export the 9/11 steel on ocean-going vessels to Asia.
To broker the deals with Asian mills Hugo Neu had created a global trading division in 1999, headed by two veteran ferrous metal traders from Marc Rich and Glencore AG in Switzerland. But why would Hugo Neu invest $24 million in dredging the channel and create a global trading division when scrap iron prices were at the lowest levels in 50 years?
As the Business Wire reported from New York in January 1999:

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 19, 1999--Hugo Neu Corporation and Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc., who jointly own and operate an extensive network of scrap metal collection, processing and recycling facilities throughout the United States, announced today the formation of a new jointly owned international trading venture.

The new venture, known as Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global Trade LLC, will build on the years of experience and expertise of Hugo Neu and Schnitzer in the international ferrous scrap metal markets and their long-term industry leadership in scrap metal processing and recycling operations. The principal officers of this venture will be Nathan K. Fruchter and Jehuda Saar, formerly co-managers of the ferrous scrap department of Glencore AG in Europe, who bring extensive experience and commodity trading know-how with them. Combined with the processing, recycling and trading capabilities of Hugo Neu and Schnitzer, Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global Trade will offer an unparalleled array of services and a broader scrap supply to a large base of overseas and domestic customers.

The new trading venture will maintain executive offices in New York and will purchase scrap and other commodities from suppliers in Eastern and Western Europe, Australia, South Africa and other foreign countries for sale to steel mills and foundries around the world.

The price of scrap steel was at a 50-year low from 2001-2003.
January 1999 seems like an odd time for Hugo Neu to have created a global trading division in ferrous scrap metal considering that the price of scrap iron had plunged 50 percent and was at its lowest point in 50 years – between $70-80 per ton. Having fallen from $150 per ton in late 1998, the price of scrap steel remained very low between 2001-2003, exactly the period when the steel from the World Trade Center was exported to Asian mills halfway around the world. With shipping costs running about $25 per ton, the cost of shipping steel to Asia devoured most of the dealer's profit margin. As Robert Kelman of Hugo Neu told the Record of New Jersey in November 2001, "I'm hoping I net $5 a ton, but I don't know.”
The two recyclers who bought the steel from the World Trade Center were taking on a huge amount of steel in the most depressed scrap market of their time. Was there a hidden partner directing the destruction of the steel? Why didn't Hugo Neu simply sell the high quality steel from the World Trade Center to U.S. mills and save money on the cost of shipping? It seems that there must have been a hidden imperative behind the decision to sell the steel to distant Asian steel mills.
If Hugo Neu's role in exporting the steel to Asia was part of the 9/11 cover up, the “principal officers” of Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global Trade would have been part of the conspiracy. This is how Jehuda Saar and Nathan K. Fruchter describe their history with Hugo Neu:

After spending their early professional careers with the Marc Rich Group both in the US and the UK, the principals of Idoru Trading Corp, Nathan K. Fruchter and Jehuda Saar, took over the Ferrous Scrap division at Glencore in Europe in 1994. They ran the division until 1999 when they were recruited by then US scrap giants Schnitzer Steel and Hugo Neu Corp. to set up their new international division, Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global Trade LLC (HNSGT).

In 2001 the two left HNSGT and created a new ferrous scrap division, Idoru LLC, for the Midland Group, combining their extensive experience in global ferrous scrap trade with Midland's steel expertise in Ukraine and the CIS. By 2005 the Midland Group completed their spin-off of the scrap division, and Idoru Trading was born.
It is not known when Saar and Fruchter actually left Hugo Neu Global Trading and went to work for the Midland Group, which was founded by two Russian Jews, Alex Shnaider and Eduard Shifrin. Fruchter told me that he had been fired from Hugo Neu in January 2000, which is certainly not true because a November 2000 article in the International Herald Tribune describes Nathan Fruchter as “vice president of the international trading division of Hugo Neu Corporation in Manhattan.” It was obvious that Fruchter did not want to tell me when he actually left Hugo Neu, but why would he want to conceal that?
It seems very likely that Fruchter and Saar had Zionist partners working on both ends of their deals. That is to say that the deals concerning the crucial steel evidence from the World Trade Center were probably done within a closed trading network of Zionist agents, with Alex Shnaider, for example, an Israeli who migrated to Israel from the Ukraine when he was 4 years old. Like Marc Rich, Shnaider's Midland Group also has an office in Hong Kong. From their early days with Marc Rich and Glencore, on to Hugo Neu and the Midland Group, Saar and Fruchter have always worked for companies closely tied to Israel and the Mossad. In 2006, the Belgian Jew Jehuda Saar emigrated from Teaneck, New Jersey, to Israel with his family. His mission in the United States was evidently finished. 

If the scrapyards that handled the steel from the World Trade Center were part of a Zionist conspiracy we would expect to find that the junkyards themselves were Zionist-owned operations. This would be consistent with the thesis that 9/11 is a conspiracy in which the key players are all dedicated Zionist partisans of the state of Israel. The junkyards would need to be under Zionist control in order to facilitate the secure destruction of the steel. This is exactly what we find with Hugo Neu Schnitzer East and Metal Management Northeast, the two junkyards that processed the steel from the World Trade Center.
Hugo Neu was a Jewish immigrant from Cologne who headed Associated Metals and Minerals Corp. (AMMC) in New York with two other German Jewish immigrants, Dr. Meno Lissauer and his brother-in-law, Walter M. Rothschild. The Hugo Neu company was started in 1947 and is still run by the tightly knit Neu family. The chairman and chief executive, John L. Neu, is the son of the founder and Robert Kelman, the general manager, is his brother-in-law. Hugo Neu's vice president in charge of environmental and public affairs is Wendy K. Neu, Neu's wife and Kelman's sister. The father of Robert and Wendy was Captain Peter B. Kelman, a Hugo Neu business associate for nearly 40 years before his death in April 2005. The Kelman family managed the shipping part of the Hugo Neu business. Captain Kelman headed a firm of marine surveyors, Peter B. Kelman & Sons, Hugo Neu's principal marine surveyor in its export business.
Hugo Neu's Zionist character can be seen by its investment in an Israeli venture capital fund called the Agua-Agro Fund, which is managed by an Israeli named Nir Belzer. Belzer also happens to be the senior manager and co-founder of Israel's Millennium Materials Technologies Funds with a man named Oren Gafri. Gafri's biographical sketch says he served as an executive of the Israeli Aircraft Industries Ltd (IAI), Bedek Division, as the Manager of Materials and Process, in charge of the Chemical, Metallurgical, Composite and Non Destructive Testing (NDT) facilities, Labs and R&D from 1979 to 1989. The key connections linking IAI, Bedek, ATASCO, and Shaul Eisenberg with 9/11 are discussed in Chapter 2, “The Planes of 9/11”.

Gafri trained at Israel's Nuclear Research Center (Dimona) in the Negev Desert, where explosive coatings using nanotechnology are developed. Gafri is a specialist in energetic nano-composite coatings exactly like the one that was found in the dust of the World Trade Center. For the junkyard that destroyed most of the steel from the Twin Towers to be invested with an Israeli fund manager who develops such coatings is noteworthy, to say the least. 

Metal Management Northeast (MMNE) of Newark was the other junkyard that handled a large amount of steel from the World Trade Center. This scrapyard facility had been a family-owned business, formerly known as Naporano Iron & Metal Co. (and NIMCO Shredding Co.), before being acquired by Metal Management, Inc. of Chicago in July 1998. In March 2001, six months before 9/11, Metal Management, Inc. announced that Alan D. Ratner had replaced Andrew J. Naporano as president of MMNE. Although he had sold his family business, Naporano remained at the company through 2001 and acted as “the consultant” to the Department of Design and Construction on the removal of the steel.
With the fall of the price of scrap steel, the junkyard industry faced financial pressures in the late 1990s. Burdened by its acquisitions in a depressed market, Metal Management Inc. filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in November 2000. Daniel W. Dienst, a managing director with CIBC World Markets, was hired to turn the company around and became a director of Metal Management in June 2001. CIBC World Markets was also known as CIBC Oppenheimer, which became a subsidiary of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce after CIBC acquired New York-based Oppenheimer & Co. in 1997. When Dienst later became chairman of the board for Metal Management Inc., in April 2003, he was still a managing director at CIBC World Markets, where he remained until January 2004. Today, after a merger with Sims Group, Dienst is Group CEO of Sims Metal Management, Ltd. The Hugo Neu Corporation has also merged with the Australia-based Sims Group.  The two companies created a joint venture corporation in 2005 known as Sims Hugo Neu Company. The merger created a new division, Hugo Neu Recycling.
At CIBC World Markets, Dienst worked under David Jonathan Kassie, chairman and CEO, and Lior Bregman, the Israeli who was managing director of CIBC World Markets and its predecessor Oppenheimer & Co., from 1988 to 2001. In May 2001, the Jerusalem Post reported that CIBC was the No. 1 underwriter in Israel and had underwritten more than $4.5 billion worth of merger and acquisitions transactions during the previous five years in Israel. "CIBC Oppenheimer has been the driving force behind investment in Israel since the early 1990s," Kassie said. In 2001, CIBC was also providing research for almost 100 Israeli companies, mainly hi-tech firms, the Post reported.
Kassie, a devoted Zionist, has participated in the Macabiah Games in Israel. He is also involved in the major Zionist organizations in Canada and the United States, and is a director of the Shoah Foundation. Under his leadership, CIBC World Markets invested in an Israeli venture capital fund called the Genesis Funds, where Lior Bregman was a partner. Bregman, as managing director of equity research at CIBC Oppenheimer, is well known to the Israeli high tech community. With a background as a military analyst, he coordinated communications equipment activity.
Kassie, Bregman, and Dienst were key players on the team of Zionists behind the takeover of Metal Management Inc. in 2000-2001.  When the crucial steel evidence was removed from the World Trade Center and taken to the junkyards of Metal Management Northeast and Hugo Neu Schnitzer East it was being taken to companies that were controlled by dedicated partisans of the Zionist cause and the state of Israel. 

(End of Part One)
Berger, Sharon, "CIBC acquires Israeli brokerage firm", Jerusalem Post, 2 May 2001

Bollyn, Christopher, "The Planes of 9-11", Solving 9/11, October 2007

Bollyn, "Calling Shaul Eisenberg," 25 October 2010

Coleman-Lochner, Lauren, " Jersey City, N.J., Steel Recycler Works on Remains of World Trade Center," The Record, Hackensack, N.J., November 2, 2001

Griscom, Amanda, “Man Behind the Mayor”, New York (magazine), 15 October 2001

Johnson, Jim, "N.J. duo tackles NYC metal mass," Waste News, 2001, HighBeam Research. (April 9, 2011).

Manning, Bill, “Selling Out the Investigation”, Fire Engineering Magazine, January 2002, 25 September 2003

Vladimirsky, Dr. Irena, "Jews of Harbin", (Mordechai Olmert biography by Linda Olmert) 

Zionist Judge Sets Arbitrary Time Limit on 9/11 Trial

April 30, 2011

The time is going to be expressed not in days, but in minutes.
- U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on his arbitrary limits for the trial to determine who is responsible for 9/11

Arbitrary time limits yield arbitrary justice. Courtroom clocks should not supplant the right to a fair trial.
- Barry S. Gedan, a lawyer forced to work in a timed trial under Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
“A 9/11 Judge Sets a Month as Time Limit for a Trial”, New York Times, April 27, 2011

This bastard judicial system is so corrupt.
- 9/11 widow Ellen Mariani

In a judicial war of attrition waged against the 9/11 families, U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has effectively blocked any trial for nearly 10 years, forcing all of the families to settle out of court, except one - the Bavis family from Boston.  Now, with only one family left standing in the 9/11 litigation, Hellerstein wants to severely limit the trial with an arbitrary time limit of 50 hours per side.  Judge Hellerstein has a clear conflict of interest in the 9/11 tort litigation.  His son is a lawyer in an Israeli law firm that represents one of the key defendants, ICTS, the airport security company that let the 19 hijackers on the planes.  Judge Hellerstein should be immediately removed from the 9/11 litigation and held accountable for obstructing justice.


It was murder. We will never get over it.
We are fighting for the truth...
I hope there are people out there who want the truth.
- Mary Bavis, mother of 9/11 victim Mark Bavis

9/11 murder victim Mark Bavis, 31, was a scout for the Los Angeles Kings. A Boston native, he played four years on Boston University's hockey team, where his twin brother, Michael, is an assistant coach.  Bavis was a passenger on United Airlines Flight 175. (Source: Boston University's 9/11 memorial site)


The Bavis family of Boston, the last family of 9/11 relatives left standing, will finally get a trial after 10 years, but the judge, Alvin K. Hellerstein, wants to keep the trial as short as possible.  Hellerstein, who has a clear conflict of interest in the case, has set an arbitrary time limit on the trial of one month with only 50 hours for each side.  As Barry S. Gedan, a lawyer who was forced to represent a plaintiff in a trial in which both sides were given only 14 hours, said:  "Arbitrary time limits yield arbitrary justice. Courtroom clocks should not supplant the right to a fair trial." 

The New York Times reported on Hellerstein's arbitrary time limit:

Donald A. Migliori, a lawyer for the Bavises, said limiting the trial to one month and dividing the time equally — he made the 50- to 60-hour estimate — was ambitious for a case of such magnitude, particularly for his client, the plaintiff, who bears the burden of proof. The lawsuit contends that the hijackers were able to board United Airlines Flight 175 in Boston because of negligence by United and other defendants, which include an airport security firm.

“The person that is affected the most is my client,” Mr. Migliori said. “We’re talking about millions of pages of documents. We’re talking about distilling one of the most important stories in American history.”

What the New York Times does not say is that the "airport security firm" is the Israeli owned company, Huntleigh USA, which is owned by the Mossad company ICTS NV (International Consultants on Targeted Security).  It needs to be stressed that Judge Hellerstein has a serious conflict of interest in the 9/11 tort litigation because his son works for the Israeli law firm that represents and works closely with the parent company of ICTS.  Judge Hellerstein should never have been allowed to handle the 9/11 tort litigation with a close family connection to one of the key defendants.   


Is is right for Judge Hellerstein to set arbitrary time limits on the 9/11 trial?  Is it even proper for Hellerstein, a devoted Zionist whose son lives on an Israeli settlement, to oversee a trial in which one of the key defendants is an Israeli "airport security" company?  Hellerstein's son is a lawyer with an Israeli law firm that represents the parent company of ICTS, one of the key defendants in the 9/11 litigation.  Is this why Hellerstein wants to “time the trial like a speed chess match” and keep the whole trial limited to one month?  Why is he allowed to protect the Israeli defendants by setting arbitrary time limits on the trial?  Is this all the justice that 9/11 deserves?  Will the judge, a dedicated partisan of Zionism, get away with his absurd restrictions?  Do Americans care enough about 9/11 truth and justice to stand up against this Zionist hijacking of our judicial system?

Judge Alvin Hellerstein has a clear conflict of interest in the 9-11 tort litigation because his son, Joseph, is a lawyer with the Israeli law firm Amit, Pollak & Matalon.  Hellerstein's law firm represents and is closely connected with Cukierman & Company, the parent company of ICTS, one of the key defendants in the 9/11 litigation.

For more information about the Bavis case and the conflict of interest with the Zionist judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, I recommend reading my articles:

"9/11 Litigation Update - Justice Denied - One Case Left"

"Judge Hellerstein's Unethical Connection to Key Defendant in 9-11 Lawsuit"

From:  Judge Sets a One Month Deadline in 9/11 Wrongful Death Case

Mark Bavis was a passenger on the second plane that hit the World Trade Center on September 11th. His family have waited nine years to sue United Airlines for wrongful death and have refused to settle the case out of court, unlike other families affected by the disaster. Their suit is the last pending lawsuit related to the events of September 11th, and Federal Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has made the rare move of putting a month limit on the length of the trial in order to expedite a judgment. Each side will have between 50 and 60 hours to present its case. “The time is going to be expressed not in days, but in minutes,” explained Hellerstein. “Everything the party wishes to do from openings through summations.”

Both the prosecution and defense have expressed their unhappiness with Hellerstein's decision. “The person that is affected the most is my client,” said Donald Migliori, the lawyer for the Bavis family. “We’re talking about millions of pages of documents. We’re talking about distilling one of the most important stories in American history.” And legal experts aren't too thrilled, either. “I’m sure if I shared this with my friends who are litigators, they’d be horrified,” said Yale law professor Stephen L. Carter.

Mike and Mary Bavis, Mark's twin brother and mother, at a 9/11 memorial in Boston.  The Bavis family has shown incredible moral courage by holding out for a trial to get to the truth of who was responsible for the mass murder of 9/11 and now the judge with a conflict of interest threatens to keep it absurdly short.  As Mary Bavis told me, "We are fighting for the truth...I hope there are people out there who want the truth." 

The 9/11 Deception and the Death of Bin Laden

May 2, 2011

Tonight, I can report to the American people and to the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama Bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, and a terrorist who's responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children....on nights like this one, we can say to those families who have lost loved ones to al Qaeda's terror:  Justice has been done.
- U.S. President Barack Obama on Osama Bin Laden, 1 May 2011

The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done.
- George W. Bush

Osama Bin Laden was responsible for the worst terrorist atrocities the world has seen - for 9/11 and for so many attacks, which have cost thousands of lives...Of course, nothing will bring back those loved ones that families have lost to terror.  But at least they know the man who was responsible for these appalling acts is no more.
- Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron

On Sunday night, the U.S. president announced that Osama Bin Laden had been killed in a U.S. military raid in Pakistan.  President Obama repeated his claim that Bin Laden was behind 9/11, saying, "We quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda - an organization headed by Osama Bin Laden...and so we went to war against al Qaeda to protect our citizens, our friends, and our allies."


While presidents Obama and Bush both said the extra-judicial killing meant "justice" had been done, their sense of justice is very odd.  After nearly 10 years, there has not been a single trial for any of the families of 9/11 to determine who is responsible for their loss.  Nor have any of the alleged terrorists behind 9/11 been tried in open courts although they have been held for nearly a decade in Guantanamo, which is where Obama says they will be tried in Soviet-style closed military tribunals.  The justice that Obama and Bush are bragging about is a gross perversion of American justice because it means condemning a person and taking their life without due process.

After supposedly having killed Bin Laden, the man behind 9/11 (along with alleged "Mastermind of 9/11", Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is held in Guantanamo) the U.S. military then quickly dropped his body in the sea.  How much sense does that make?  Why would the U.S. want to dump the body and destroy the evidence that they had really killed Osama Bin Laden?  Dumping the body of a murder victim in the ocean is what the Mafia does with its victims to hide the evidence.  This is not how a law-abiding nation should act.  This is most unusual and raises obvious questions about who was really killed.  "After 10 years of searching for Al Qaeda mastermind Osama bin Laden, why would President Obama announce that the terror-master has been killed in a firefight with American special forces, announce that we have the body, and then DUMP THE BODY IN THE OCEAN two hours later, before anyone can see the body and verify it?" asks Jane Jamison in her article "Where is Osama bin Laden’s Body?"

The British Prime Minister David Cameron repeated the unproven claim of Bush and Obama that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11, adding that "the man who was responsible for these appalling acts is no more."  But was Bin Laden really responsible for the 9/11 attacks and the demolitions that killed 3,000 people?  There is actually no evidence that proves that Bin Laden was behind the attacks and a great deal indicating that 9/11 was a sophisticated conspiracy involving the intelligence agency of a state.

While U.S. and British political leaders claim that Bin Laden was behind 9/11, that's not what the FBI's Most Wanted poster says about him.  It does not even mention that he is suspected of being involved in 9/11.  Why would our political leaders claim that Bin Laden was behind 9/11 if their Federal Bureau of Investigation, who collected all of the evidence from the crime scenes, does not? 

On 8 May 2002, nine months after the attacks, Robert S. Mueller, the director of the FBI, told the Senate Committee on the Judiciary:  "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot." 

The FBI is the principal investigative arm of the U.S. Department of Justice and has special investigative jurisdiction in cases of terrorism.  The FBI, an agency under the criminal division of the department (then headed by Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff, the Israeli son of the Mossad agent Livia Eisen), oversaw the investigation of 9/11. “Investigation is what we do," the bureau says on its website, "gathering facts and evidence to solve and prevent crimes."

Although the FBI supposedly collected the evidence from the 9/11 crime scenes, it has never presented any evidence that would prove that Osama Bin Laden and al Qaeda carried out the attacks.  Nor has the FBI presented any evidence that would identify the aircraft that crashed into the buildings on 9/11.  If the government had real evidence that would conclusively prove its case for waging war in Afghanistan, why has it not presented the evidence in a federal court after 10 years?

A proper criminal investigation has to proceed from the evidence. Any inquiry that does not examine all the evidence is not an investigation, but a fraud.  This is what happened at the World Trade Center crime scene, where the FBI allowed men working for Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York City, to take control of the crucial steel evidence that could have proven exactly what had caused the explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers.  The structural steel was hastily destroyed before it could be examined by experts.  Why would the FBI, whose obligation it is to gather all the evidence, allow the most critical evidence from the crime scene to be destroyed without being examined?

Dust and steel were all that remained after the explosive demolitions that destroyed the Twin Towers -- and the 2,752 people inside of them. "The concrete was literally pulverized; all you're left with is steel and dust," Robert A. Kelman, the man who managed the destruction of most of the steel said.  Kelman was general manager of Hugo Neu, the company who managed the destruction of 250,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center by sending it to Asian smelters, far from the prying eyes of 9/11 investigators.

The FBI allowed the steel from the World Trade Center to be destroyed because it was solid evidence that would have exposed who and what had actually caused the murderous demolition of the Twin Towers.  The destruction of this crucial evidence was an intrinsic part of the crime of 9/11 and the people who allowed it to happen are part of the criminal gang behind the terrorism.

If the attacks were truly carried out by Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida there would be no reason to hide any of the evidence because it should serve to corroborate and confirm the official version. If, on the other hand, 9/11 was a false-flag terror deception it would be absolutely imperative for the perpetrators to confiscate and destroy any evidence that could disprove their interpretation of events. 

Author's note:  The destruction of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center is the subject of my forthcoming article, which will be the final chapter of my book, Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World 

Eric Holder: The Zionist Agent & the "Mastermind of 9/11"

Updated - April 21, 2011

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
(Who will guard the guards themselves?)
- Plato, Republic  (ca. 380 B.C.)

ZIONIST AGENT AND U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL Eric H. Holder shut down the federal prosecution of the "Mastermind of 9/11" effectively blocking any chance for an open trial for the men accused of planning the terror attacks that changed America.  Holder was also instrumental in getting Bill Clinton's last minute pardon of the Israeli Mossadnik Marc Rich.  Both actions were done to protect the Zionist terror network behind 9/11.

THE SHOW MUST GO ON - The man said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "Mastermind of 9/11" and many other terror attacks and murders, will be processed in a closed military tribunal at the "Gulag of Gitmo".  An American professor who taught the real Khalid Sheikh Mohammed told me that he had never seen the face of the man the government says is KSM.

No photographs accompanied the release of the KSM confession and there are very few photos of the person who is accused of being the terrorist mastermind of our time. To see if the disheveled, hairy, and overweight person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed resembled the mechanical engineering student that studied in Greensboro in the 1980s, I contacted the engineering faculty of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University. David E. Klett, a retired professor of thermodynamics, had the real KSM in several of his classes. Asked about the photos of the person said to be the terror mastermind, Klett said, "I did not recognize that person. I never saw that face before." (Source: "The Real Reason for Delaying the 9-11 Trial")

A sketch of the Gitmo process on 19 January 2009, "a hearing at the U.S. Military Commissions court for war crimes" with KSM and other 9/11 scapegoats, by courtroom artist Janet Hamlin. From top to bottom, they are Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Waleed Bin Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, and Mustafa Ahmad al Hawsawi.
The terror suspects that are being processed in closed military tribunals have been medicated on "undisclosed psychotropic drugs". This is a very important fact to keep in mind because these drugs are used to create false memories and other madness. The Plain Dealer reported two years ago, in January 2009, that Ramzi Binalshibh was already insane:

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVY BASE, Cuba -- Guards shackled Sept. 11 terror suspect Ramzi bin al-Shibh to the courtroom floor and suspect Khalid Sheik Mohammed again said he welcomed death Monday as the U.S. government sought to press ahead with its showcase war crimes trial on the eve of Barack Obama's inauguration. Throughout it all Judge Stephen Henley, an Army colonel, handled procedural issues in the case for which the Pentagon seeks military execution. 

"I really don't care whether I'm shackled or not," declared bin al-Shibh, a Yemeni whose U.S. appointed lawyers argue he may be mentally unfit to stand trial in the mass murder of nearly 3,000 on Sept. 11, 2001. Court records show that prison camp doctors have bin al-Shibh on undisclosed psychotropic drugs.

Source:  "Terror suspect is defiant at Guantanamo hearing, confesses pride in 9/11, is on psychotropic drugs", by Bill Meyer, The Plain Dealer, 19 January 2009

Detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

"Hooding" is a form of torture.

Guantanamo, of course, is the signal emblem of Obama's unfulfilled promises. In the first week of his presidency, he signed an executive order calling for the closure of the notorious detention center within a year. He said he wanted to restore "the standards of due process and the core constitutional values that have made this country great even in the midst of war, even in dealing with terrorism." Yet Guantanamo remains open, and indeed will be the setting for Mohammed's trial.
- "Obama administration's anti-terror architecture: Too much like Bush", Los Angeles Times, 10 April 2011

So is there a difference between Democrats and Republicans? Sure. The Democrats say one thing ("Save the planet!") and then do another - quietly holding hands behind the scenes with the bastards who make this world a dirtier, meaner place. The Republicans just come right out and give the bastards a corner office in the West Wing. That's the difference.
- Michael Moore, "Democrats, DOA",
Stupid White Men

On 22 January 2009 President Barack Obama signed an executive order calling for the closure of the detention facility of Guantanamo within one year.  He also promised that the 9/11 detainees would be tried in civilian courts in the United States.  Today, more than two years later, the Gitmo Gulag is still in operation and the Obama administration has decided to process the detainee said to be the "Mastermind of 9/11" in a closed military tribunal. 

Understanding why Obama caved on his promise to close "Gitmo" and try the 9/11 suspects in civilian courts requires knowing a few important facts about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the 9/11 deception that you will not find in the pages of the controlled press.

One might wonder how Michael Moore, the film producer who made millions on Fahrenheit 9/11, feels about Obama's decision to try the 9/11 suspects in closed military tribunals in Cuba. Moore and his wife donated generously to the Obama campaign, and he has insider access to the Obama White House. His agent in Hollywood is the Israeli, Ariel Emanuel (left), brother of Rahm Emanuel, Obama's Chief of Staff (and "enforcer" of the Clinton White House) prior to becoming the mayor of Chicago.

No wonder Moore's deceptive film about 9/11 (which grossed over $222 million) did not even mention the many documented Israeli connections to the false-flag terror attacks. The Israeli sons of Ben Emanuel (a former member of the terrorist Stern Gang/LEHI) profited from their controlled interpretation of the terror attacks. Moore later wrote an open letter to Obama offering to be next Chief of Staff -- along with Ari Emanuel. It should be noted that Rahm Emanuel was the driving force behind the passage of the disastrous NAFTA bill (under Clinton) that devastated the U.S. manufacturing sector, one of Moore's pet peeves, yet Emanuel's brother Ari is Moore's Hollywood agent. So, who was behind controlling the message in Moore's 9/11 film? Or were they in it together? Look at the photo of Ari and Mike hugging and smiling and judge for yourself.

WHO'S THAT BEHIND THOSE FOSTER GRANTS? - The detainee the military says is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (top, wearing sunglasses) and co-defendants Walid Bin Attash, and Ramzi Bin al Shibh, left, at a pretrial session in December 2008 at Guantánamo Bay. The question is serious as the real Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) was reported to have been killed in Pakistan one year after 9/11.  Reading the court transcript from 10 March 2007 it is odd that the detainee said to be KSM is not asked to identify himself and does not speak English very well.  The real KSM earned a degree in engineering in North Carolina. 


April 4, 2011 - U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder announces that the alleged "Mastermind of 9/11" and four other terrorists will not face open trial in the United States -- but closed military tribunals in Cuba.  Who benefits from this decision?  

Holder, a Zionist agent who served as deputy attorney general during the second Clinton administration, was instrumental in getting a presidential pardon for the Israeli mega-criminal Marc Rich.  What Holder did not say about the KSM decision is that the U.S. had dropped its case against the men accused of carrying out 9/11.  Could it be that the real reason Holder dropped the charges against the alleged "Mastermind of 9/11" is that the real KSM died - on September 11, 2002 - and they can't risk having the 9/11 hoax exposed in an open court in the United States?
Watching Eric Holder announce that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will not be tried in an open court I was immediately struck by the way Holder looks like he is lying.  One gets the same impression when watching Holder on "Face the Nation" in Aspen in July 2010.  This man is not telling the truth about why KSM will not be tried in the United States. 

It should be remembered that Eric Holder was Bill Clinton's deputy attorney general, and Holder played a key insider role in the pardon of the Zionist mega-criminal and Mossadnik Marc Rich.  When asked by the White House what he thought about a pardon for Rich, Holder replied, "Neutral, leaning towards favorable."

Of the 71 people who signed letters of support submitted with the Israeli Marc Rich's pardon application, 48 were prominent Israelis (67.6 percent). Another eight were leading American Jews, such as Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, and Rabbi Irving Greenberg, chairman of the board of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.  In a March 2001 article entitled
"Pardon Us", the Jerusalem Post wrote:  "Topping a list of dozens said to have recommended that Rich be pardoned are [Ehud] Barak, Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert, former Mossad head Ya'acov [Shabtai] Shavit, and directors of museums, hospitals and other institutions."  Shimon Peres also personally pressed Clinton to pardon Marc Rich.

In February 2001, Jodi Enda of Knight Ridder News reported that the Mossad had been behind the pardon for Marc Rich:  "The petition asking Clinton to pardon Rich also contained a number of letters from the heads of Israeli philanthropic organizations, whose support was solicited by Avner Azulay, executive director of the Rich Foundation, a charitable entity that Rich established in Tel Aviv in 1988. Azulay is a former Mossad agent, according to a House of Representatives investigator who has been researching the pardon and who asked not to be identified. Rich's bodyguards also are former Israeli intelligence agents, the investigator said."

As Richard Cohen of the Washington Post wrote in his December 2008 article on Eric Holder,
"Pardon My Exception": 

The Rich pardon request had power written all over it -- the patronage of important Democratic fundraisers, for instance. Holder also said he was "really struck" by the backing of Rich by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and the possibility of "foreign policy benefits that would be reaped by granting the pardon." This is an odd standard for American justice, but more than that, what was Holder thinking? That U.S.-Israeli relations would suffer? Holder does not sound naive. He sounds disingenuous.

Eric Holder serves as an agent for the Zionist criminal network that controls the Obama administration and that ran the Clinton White House.  As I pointed out in my article,
"Why the 'Mastermind of 9-11' is Kept Secluded"

Eric Holder not only studied with Jews, his family vacationed with the most elite Jewish Zionist families in the United States. ... Eric Holder's relationship with highest-level Zionists explains his appointment to serve as U.S. Attorney General.

As a high level Zionist agent at the Department of Justice, Eric Holder has been instrumental in protecting the Zionist criminal network behind 9/11.  In 2001, Holder was a key insider in obtaining a presidential pardon for Marc Rich, the Israeli Mossadnik who in 1999 set up the
global trading division at Hugo Neu, the Jersey City junkyard that disposed of most of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center by sending it to Asian smelters to prevent it from being used as evidence.  In 2011, Holder, as U.S. Attorney General, shut down the U.S. prosecution of the alleged 9/11 terrorists and prevented an open trial for the accused "Mastermind of 9/11".  Both of these actions were taken to protect the real criminals behind the terror attacks that changed America.


Key extracts from
"A chilling inheritance of terror" by Syed Saleem Shahzad, Asia Times, 30 October 2002: 

KARACHI - Ever since the frenzied shootout last month on September 11 in Karachi there have been doubts over whether Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed head of al-Qaeda's military committee, died in the police raid on his apartment. ...

Now it has emerged that Kuwaiti national Khalid Shaikh Mohammed did indeed perish in the raid, but his wife and child were taken from the apartment and handed over to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), in whose hands they remain. ...

After this suicide attack, the FBI were onto Shaikh Mohammed in a big way, and, no doubt not entirely without coincidence, on September 11 they decided on a showdown at the apartment of Shaikh Mohammed, his wife and child, in the Defense Housing Authority near Korangi Road. A number of Arabs were also living in the apartment at the time.

Initially, the joint ISI-FBI plan was to take Shaikh Mohammed alive so that he could be grilled, especially as he was believed to have knowledge of other al-Qaeda cells in Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen and elsewhere. However, as a plainclothed officer climbed the stairs toward the third-floor apartment, a hand grenade was thrown, and he retreated. Reinforcements then arrived, and for the next few hours a fierce gun battle blazed.

The FBI, still keen to take Shaikh Mohammed alive, teargassed the area, and a number of people were captured. However, despite instructions to the contrary, a few Pakistan Rangers entered the flat, where they found Shaikh Mohammed and another man, allegedly with their hands up. The Rangers nevertheless opened fire on the pair.

Later, the Pakistani press carried pictures of a message scrawled in blood on the wall of the flat, proclaiming the Muslim refrain of Kalma, in Arabic: "There is no God except Allah, Mohammed is his messenger".  An official who was present in the flat at the time of the shooting has told Asia Times Online that the message was written by Shaikh Mohammed with his own blood as his life drained from him. ...

The widow subsequently underwent exhaustive interrogation in the custody of FBI officials, during which she revealed details of people who visited her husband, and of his other contacts and plans. News of the death of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was intentionally suppressed so that officials could play on the power of his name to follow up leads and contacts. 

So, we don't know whether KSM is dead or alive, but the Mayor of New York City certainly does not want to have an open trial for the "Mastermind of 9/11".  It would cost too much, he says.  Might there be another reason the mayor, who is very close to the criminal gang running the State of Israel, does not want a 9/11 trial in New York?

PARTNERS IN 9/11 AND OTHER CRIMES - Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak (r) with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg in Barak's office in Tel Aviv on January 4, 2009 during Barak's criminal military assault, which included using white phosphorus bombs on the defenseless population of Gaza. Some 1,400 Palestinian civilians were killed during the Israeli operation named "Cast Lead", which Bloomberg supported.

"I happen to think that it's probably more appropriate to do it in a secure area with a military tribunal. While we would have provided the security if we had to here in New York City, you know — being spared the expense is good for us."
- Michael Bloomberg, mayor of New York City, on U.S. decision to have the accused "Mastermind of 9/11", Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four alleged henchmen face a military commission in Guantanamo rather than an open trial in a U.S. court.

Aaron with the scapegoat and the Levites

And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness.
- Leviticus 16:21

The Scapegoat (1854-6) by William Holman Hunt

The Scapegoat of 9/11 (2003-11) by U.S. Government

David E. Klett, a retired professor of thermodynamics, had the real Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as a student in several of his classes. When I asked the professor about the person in the photo (above) said to be the terror mastermind of 9/11 and other crimes, Klett said, "I did not recognize that person. I never saw that face before."  So who is this person they tell us is the "Mastermind of 9/11" and why won't they put him on trial in the United States?  Is he simply a scapegoat upon whose head they have laid their sins?  Do Americans care enough to end a decade of deception and war?


It is now being reported that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), the alleged "Mastermind of 9/11", will not stand trial in an open court in the United States but will face a military commission at Guantanamo, where he was tortured 183 times in 2003.  This is a complete travesty of justice, but the Zionist-controlled Obama administration has very good reasons for not letting KSM face trial in an open court.  Putting KSM and the other "terrorists" on trial would expose the pack of lies behind 9/11 and the "War on Terror", which is something their Zionist masters will not let happen.


The Blog of the Legal Times (BLT) has a webpage entitled
"In Moving KSM Trial, DOJ Blames Congress" with clickable links to the 5-page nolle prosequi statement with which the U.S. Department of Justice dropped its charges and prosecution against KSM and 4 other "terrorists", and the 81-page unsealed indictment. 

Nolle prosequi is a Latin legal term which means "we shall no longer prosecute."  This is a declaration made to the judge by a prosecutor in a criminal case either before or during trial, meaning the case against the defendant is being dropped. The "nolle prosequi" statement is an admission that the charges cannot be proved, that evidence has demonstrated either innocence or a fatal flaw in the prosecution's claim, or the district attorney has become convinced the accused is innocent.  This is how the United States of America dropped its charges against the alleged "Mastermind of 9/11", Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and four other accused terrorists:  Walid Bin Attash, Ramzi Bin Al-Shibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Mustafa Al- Hawsawi.


The only reason given in the nolle prosequi statement for dismissing the U.S. indictment and prosecution of the alleged "Mastermind of 9/11" and four other terror suspects is simply ludicrous:  the U.S. is dropping its prosecution of the accused terrorists behind 9/11 because Congress will not pay their airfare from Cuba to the United States!   

The statement says that the U.S. cannot put the accused terrorists on trial because Section 1032 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (
H.R.6523) "bars the use of funds authorized to be appropriated by the Act to transfer the defendants from the United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States, even for prosecution."

Let's look at exactly what Section 1032 says:


None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2011 may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who--

(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense.
This is the only reason given in the nolle prosequi statement for dropping the U.S. indictment of the men accused of 9/11:   "In light of this opposition by Congress to a federal criminal prosecution, the Government does not believe there is any reasonable likelihood that the defendants will be tried in the near future," the statement says.  This is clearly not the real reason the U.S. dropped the charges against the "Mastermind of 9/11".

"Because a timely prosecution in federal court does not appear feasible, the Attorney General intends to refer this matter to the Department of Defense to proceed in military commissions," the nolle prosequi statement concludes.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder claims that the Department of Justice is unable to bring these terror suspects to trial in the United States.  This is an utterly false argument that is being presented to the public as a plausible excuse to explain why the alleged "Mastermind of 9/11" will not be tried in an open court to find out what he did and how he did it.  This is because the real masterminds behind 9/11 want a closed military tribunal to be the final chapter in their evil deception.  This is meant to be the conclusion of the 9/11 saga in which the perpetrators kill a scapegoat for the false-flag terror atrocity that changed America and the world.


The New York Times broke the news with an article entitled 
"In Reversal, 9/11 Plotter to Be Tried by Military Panel", saying:

In a major reversal, the Obama administration has decided to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed for his role in the attacks of Sept. 11 before a military commission at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and not in a civilian courtroom. 

What this means is that there will be NO 9/11 trial, ever.  There will be no trial for the relatives who lost loved ones nor will there be a trial for the man who is accused of being the "mastermind" behind the 9/11 terror atrocity -- and many other acts of terror and mass murder.  The following are some of the crimes that the
BBC Profile on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed says he had admitted to having planned and carried out:

The organisation, planning, follow-up and execution of the 9/11 operation;

Responsibility for the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center in New York;

The bombing of nightclubs in Bali in 2002 and a Kenyan hotel in the same year;

Responsibility for the failed attempt by the so-called shoe bomber, Richard Reid, to bring down an American plane;

Plots to attack Heathrow Airport, Canary Wharf and Big Ben in London, to hit targets in Israel, and to blow up the Panama Canal;
A plot to hit towers in the US cities of Los Angeles, Seattle, Chicago and the Empire State Building in New York, and to attack US nuclear power stations;

Plots to assassinate the late Pope John Paul II and former US President Bill Clinton;

He said he had used his own "blessed right hand" to behead Daniel Pearl, according to Pentagon papers.

Official documents have shown that Mr Mohammed was subjected to waterboarding - or simulated drowning - 183 times in 2003, before this interrogation technique was banned.


Having reported that the man said to KSM has "confessed" to all of the above crimes and is ready to plead guilty and die a martyr, the BBC News aired a two-minute video piece entitled,
"9/11 accused to be tried at Guantanamo Bay", that reported the decision with this commentary by Steve Kingstone:
With the tenth anniversary of 9/11 approaching, the Obama administration seems to have decided that military justice is better than no justice... But does the rest of America care? ... Polls suggest that most voters can live with the military option.

As I have explained for years, in articles like
"Why the 'Mastermind of 9-11' is Kept Secluded", there is one reason the U.S. government can never hold a 9/11 trial for the man they call Khalid Sheikh Mohammed:

The basic reason that there will be no trial for the so-called "Mastermind of 9/11" is because the suspect being held at Guantánamo is neither Khalid Sheikh Mohammed nor the "Mastermind of 9/11", and the U.S. government and military are well aware of that.

To understand the real reason for the Obama administration's about-face on its decision to try the "Mastermind of 9/11" in an open court in the United States, read my articles about the identity fraud concerning the real KSM. The man they call Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the "Mastermind of 9/11" and many other terror crimes and mass murder is nothing but a scapegoat. There can be no judicial process for him or anyone else blamed for 9/11 because it would expose the whole pack of lies behind the deception that changed America.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

BBC News, "9/11 accused to be tried at Guantanamo Bay", 5 April 2011

BBC News, "Profile: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed - al-Qaeda 'kingpin'", 4 April 2011

BLT - Blog of the Legal Times, "In Moving KSM Trial, DOJ Blames Congress", 4 April 2011

Bollyn, Christopher, "Why the "Mastermind of 9-11" is Kept Secluded", 9 October 2010

Bollyn, "Terror Mastermind KSM is an Imposter - The Confession is Fake", 16 March 2007

Bollyn, "Gitmo Gulag Fraud and Chaos", 16 July 2009

Bollyn, "Was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Captured?" 16 March 2007

Bollyn, "The Denial of Justice for 9-11 Victims", 20 March 2007

Bollyn, "Cheney the Tyrant on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and 9/11",, 8 August 2007 

"Holder, High Achiever Poised to Scale New Heights", by Javier C. Hernandez, New York Times, 30 November 2008

Enda, Jodi, "Clinton granted pardon to Rich partly because of pressure from Israel", Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service, 14 February 2001

"Making History With Obama" by Andrew Longstreth, The American Lawyer, 5 June 2008
Syed Saleem Shahzad, "A chilling inheritance of terror", Asia Times, 30 October 2002

Verbatim Transcript of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Hearing for ISN 10024, BBC News, U.S. Military, Guantanamo Bay, 10 March 2007 

Hugo Neu and the Giuliani Partners Who Destroyed the Steel of 9/11

Updated - April 18, 2011

"The concrete was literally pulverized; all you're left with is steel and dust."
- Robert A. Kelman, General Manager of Hugo Neu Schnitzer East, who managed the destruction of 250,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center by sending it to Asian smelters, far from the prying eyes of 9/11 investigators.
Source: Quinn, William, "Recycling a Disaster", NJBIZ, 16 October 2001

The absence of 110 concrete floors and the steel pans stacked like pancakes in the rubble was obvious.  How 220 acre-size floors of concrete were transformed into clouds of burning dust is the question that a proper examination of the steel would have answered. 

The 4-inch deep concrete floors of the World Trade Center sat in steel pans supported by trusses.  The explosive thermitic coating that pulverized the floors was probably applied to the steel trusswork and undersides of the floor pans, probably under the guise of being rust- or fire-proofing.  It may have also been applied in the electrical and telephone ducts that ran through the concrete floors.

The price of scrap steel for export in 2001-2003 was at its lowest level in 50 years, between $70-80 per ton.  Why would a steel trader in New Jersey spend $25 per ton to ship the WTC steel to distant Asian smelters when it could have been shipped for a fraction of the cost to U.S. steel companies? 

Robert Kelman, the man whose company handled much of the steel from the World Trade Center, said about the debris being brought to his Jersey City scrapyard, "The concrete was literally pulverized; all you're left with is steel and dust."  Because the remaining steel would reveal how the 220 concrete floors and their steel pans were pulverized, the architects of terror had to make sure that the steel was quickly cut up and sent to Asian smelters where it would be destroyed far from the eyes of investigators.  The task to destroy this crucial evidence was taken care of by the dedicated Zionist agents who controlled the mayor of New York City, Rudy Giuliani.

National Public Radio (NPR) reported in February 2002 that Hugo Neu had received, processed and shipped almost 230,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center. Kelman told NPR that some of the steel went directly from ground zero to barges -- to his junkyard in Jersey City. At the Hugo Neu junkyard the girders and columns were cut into pieces shorter than five feet (60 inches) and mixed in with other scrap before being sent to smelters in Asia, although the shipping cost was obviously much higher than sending it to an American steel maker.  Cut, mix, and ship, seems to have been the Hugo Neu program for the crucial evidence from the World Trade Center. 

The World Trade Center complex contained an estimated 285,000 tons of steel.  In September 2002 the Associated Press reported that Hugo Neu had processed 250,000 tons (88 percent) of WTC steel:  "The company that filled Megasteel's order, Hugo Neu Schnitzer East of Jersey City, New Jersey, said it had handled 250,000 tons of trade center scrap and had sent shipments to 11 countries, including Malaysia, China, South Korea and Japan."

Robert Kelman of Hugo Neu told the press that he was selling the steel for about $105 a ton. But he also paid up to $25 a ton to ship it. "I'm hoping I net $5 a ton, but I don't know," he said. The two recyclers who bought the steel from the World Trade Center were taking on a huge amount of steel in the most depressed scrap market of their time.  Was there a hidden partner who managed the destruction of the steel? 

Today, Hugo Neu is invested in an Israeli venture capital fund called the Agua-Agro Fund. The Agua-Agro fund is managed by Nir Belzer, a senior manager and co-founder of Israel's Millenium Materials Technologies Funds with a man named Oren Gafri.

From 1979 to 1989, Gafri served as an executive of the Israeli Aircraft Industries Ltd (IAI), Bedek Division, as the Manager of Materials and Process, in charge of the Chemical, Metallurgical, Composite and Non Destructive Testing (NDT) facilities, Labs and R&D. He trained at Israel's Nuclear Research Center (Dimona) in the Negev Desert.  Gafri is a specialist in energetic nano-composite coatings exactly like the one that pulverized the 220 acres of concrete floors in the World Trade Center. Belzer and Gafri's MMT Fund is
invested in several companies that produce such coatings. These connections are certainly not entirely coincidental.

GIULIANI THE ZIONIST - New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani speaks at a pro-Israel rally on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. 15 April 2002.

Mayor Rudy Giuliani with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in March 2011
Giuliani's comments in Israel reveal his hawkish position on Iran (note the background) and ignorance of the Middle East.  Giuliani said he was disappointed that Obama was "supporting those who wanted to overthrow [former Egyptian president Hosni] Mubarak and not those trying to overthrow the regime in Iran."

PARTNERS IN CRIME - Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon (C), New York Governor George Pataki and New York City Mayor-elect Michael Bloomberg joined hands on December 9, 2001 at Sharon's office in Jerusalem. Giuliani has been complicit in the cover up of the Israeli-managed false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 from the beginning.


Giuliani's partners in his consulting company, Giuliani Partners, are all key players from his administration who were involved in the 9/11 cover up and destruction of crucial evidence from the crime scene. The executives at Giuliani Partners include Pasquale J. D'Amuro, the FBI inspector in charge of the 9/11 investigation, who supervised the "non-investigation" at the World Trade Center, and Richard Sheirer, the "Jewish knight" who oversaw the removal and destruction of the crucial steel evidence by having it sent to Zionist-run scrapyards in New Jersey whence it was shipped to Asian smelters. Between D'Amuro and Sheirer, the people at Giuliani Partners certainly know who authorized the destruction of this crucial evidence from the scene of the worst case of mass murder in American history, but they aren't talking. Why have these key players in the 9/11 cover up all joined Giuliani Partners and who are they serving?

Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert (L) and Mayor Rudolph Giuliani at a press briefing about the recovery operations at the World Trade Center disaster area September 21, 2001 at the Emergency Operations Center in New York City. What is most peculiar about this visit is that Giuliani hid the fact that Olmert had been in New York City on the day before 9/11 and probably on the day itself. I am the only journalist to have reported on Olmert's secret visit to New York City on 9/11. Why was Olmert in New York City on 10 September 2001, and why has his visit been kept secret?

My research to identify the person who authorized the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center focused on the men who worked with Mayor Rudy Giuliani on 9/11 and who continue to work with him.  Richard J. Sheirer, then commissioner of Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management, is a likely candidate as is the mayor himself.  Having called and written to the offices of both Giuliani and Sheirer, I am still waiting for their responses.  I turned to the former officials of New York City after Michael Chertoff responded by saying that he had not authorized the removal of the steel.  This indicates that Attorney General John Ashcroft and his assistant, Michael Chertoff, who directed the 9/11 investigation, allowed Giuliani's men to make the decision to send the steel from the World Trade Center to scrapyards in New Jersey, whence it was quickly sent to Asian smelters to be destroyed.

An enormous magnet and grappler moves World Trade Center steel at Hugo Neu Schnitzer Northeast, a New Jersey scrap yard with close ties to Israel and the Rothschild family. 

Hugo Neu Schnitzer East, of Jersey City, said it handled 250,000 tons of World Trade Center scrap and shipped it to 11 countries, including Malaysia, China, South Korea and Japan. The firm's general manager, Bob Kelman, senior vice president of Hugo NEU Schnitzer East, said steel from the twin towers was sliced into pieces with industrial guillotines or blow torches and thrown in with other scrap before being shipped.  Kelman told NPR, "Steel's the most recycled product in the world. Over 60 million tons of it is recycled in the United States annually. The most efficient process for making new steel is by recycling it from steel scrap."

So, why was the steel from the World Trade Center sent to smelters halfway around the world?  The answer is obvious.  The steel was crucial evidence from the crime scene that would have revealed that the towers had been destroyed using explosives, Thermite, and a sophisticated nanocomposite of super-thermite.  The steel had to be quickly removed and destroyed to protect the criminal network behind the demolition.

Pasquale J. D'Amuro - The Giuliani partner and FBI special agent who managed the 9/11 cover up.

Pasquale J. D'Amuro is from the Buffalo/Niagara Falls area, a key Mafia smuggling town since the days of Prohibition.  Jewish and Italian mafia crime bosses worked closely together with the "Jewish navy" smuggling Bronfman whisky into the U.S. from Canada. 

D'Amuro was the FBI's main man heading the investigation of the 9/11 attacks.  As we now know, D'Amuro and the FBI, under the control of an Israeli son of the Mossad, Michael Chertoff, managed what can only be called a criminal cover up of what really happened on 9/11.  D'Amuro played the key role as the FBI confiscated crucial evidence and allowed the steel from the World Trade Center to be destroyed.  What kind of criminal investigator allows the evidence from the crime scene to be destoyed before it can be properly examined? 

On 31 January 2002, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, III,
announced the appointment of Pasquale "Pat" D'Amuro as Assistant Director for Counterterrorism:

"Pat's long experience in conducting counterterrorism investigations includes heading the PENTTBOM [9/11] investigation and overseeing the investigations of the first World Trade Center bombing, the embassy bombings in East Africa, and the U.S.S. Cole attack. He possesses strong leadership abilities, demonstrated during his tenure as Associate Special Agent in Charge and Acting Special Agent in Charge of the New York Field Office. These investigative and leadership talents, refined by the experience of a 22-year career as a Special Agent of the FBI, make him well prepared to take on the challenge of directing the Counterterrorism Division during a critical period of reorganization and refocusing of the work of the FBI."

The "invisible Jewish Knight" who oversaw the destruction of the 9/11 evidence, Richard Sheirer (r), former commissioner of the Office of Emergency Management, his wife, Barbara, and their son, Andrew, after his FDNY graduation ceremony at Brooklyn College, 31 December 2005.
Source - Staten Island Advance at

New York magazine's Amanda Griscom wrote a revealing article entitled "Man Behind the Mayor" that spotlighted Richard Sheirer and his key role as the "Wizard of O.E.M." in managing the "clean up" of the crime scene at Ground Zero. Sheirer admitted that he prided himself on being "invisible", saying, "I think it's very valuable to be invisible for the job I do.":

Quiet and camera-shy, Sheirer makes most of his public appearances standing behind the mayor's left shoulder. He's the one who's not Kerik or Von Essen, the short, stout man who bows his head in the limelight, his eyes downcast behind huge square glasses, his jowls drooping as he whispers updates in the mayor's ear. He's the guy Giuliani calls "the man behind the curtain." He's the wizard of OEM...

Since September 11, Sheirer has taken charge of the biggest cleanup effort in American history, coordinating 100 federal, state, and local agencies, including FEMA. He's become, in effect, the CEO of a company with thousands of workers and a budget that could run up to $40 billion -- or, if you prefer, the mayor of the hot zone. He calls in the city's Department of Transportation to patch up the streets and has the Department of Design and Construction hang netting so broken glass won't fall on workers below. He orders Con Ed and Verizon to rehabilitate buildings without power or phone service, then gets the Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Design and Construction to make sure they're safe. If they pass the test, he signs the documents that open them up to the public. "OEM is in charge," says Mike Byrne, deputy federal coordinating officer of FEMA for this incident. "Sheirer gives the marching orders. So far, we're blown away by OEM's performance." ...

"One of the things I pride myself on," says Sheirer, "is that, for a short, round guy, I can be pretty invisible. I think it's very valuable to be invisible for the job I do. It's important to me to be prepared, to get in, get it done, and get out. My people understand -- we don't need fanfare. Invisibility enhances our ability to work with everyone because they know we're not looking to take the limelight."
The Jewish Week reported that Sheirer had been named a "Jewish Knight" by the New York Board of Rabbis.  Saying it was "correcting what it called an 'oversight'," the Board of Rabbis "named Sheirer a 'Jewish Knight' after Britain lionized Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and then-Police and Fire Commissioners Bernard Kerik and Thomas Von Essen.  Sheirer stayed on into the administration of Mayor Bloomberg, to manage the removal of the rubble saying he was doing so "to finish what I started."

"This knight is different from all other knights," joked Rabbi Joseph Potasnik, the Fire Department's Jewish chaplain and president of the Board of Rabbis."  Sheirer comes from a family of Lithuanian Jews from Kaunas (Kovno) named Sher.  The Sheirer spelling comes from a misspelling of his name on his father's birth certificate.

Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani points to the rubble of the former World Trade Center for Mayor George A. Spadoro (L) of Edison, N.J., Mayor Marc Morial (2nd-R) of New Orleans on 26 January 2002.  Richard J. Sheirer, "Ground Zero's Jewish Knight" and director of Mayors Office of Emergency Management (OEM) is on the right. 
"The Man Behind the Mayor" is an excellent article in New York magazine about Sheirer's work at Ground Zero, under whose oversight the structural steel (crucial evidence from the crime scene) was destroyed before it could be examined by engineers. Who's to blame?

Giuliani's fawning support for hard-line Zionism is also due to his orthodox Jewish handlers, such as Bruce Teitelbaum, his former chief of staff and campaign adviser, who is closely tied to Israeli causes and clients. Giuliani, whose father was a Mafia gangster, is very hawkish on Israel because Zionist hawks control him through the millions of dollars they have given him. An article in the Wall Street Journal from December 2007, entitled "Giuliani's Profitable Partnership" explains how Giuliani was paid more than $600,000 in speaking fees (for 4 speeches), from the diamond-trading Steinmetz family of Israel and their private equity firm, Sage Capital Growth. Giuliani's $600,000 pay-off from the Mossad-linked Steinmetz family was arranged by Geoffrey N. Hess, another Giuliani Partner. (For more about the Steinmetz family connections read "Iceland - The Hallmarks of an Israeli Operation")

Bruce Teitelbaum (r), an orthodox Jewish Zionist, was Giuliani's chief of staff and "aggressive and dogged right-hand man." No wonder how devoted Zionists filled every important slot in the Giuliani adminstration. Teitelbaum is married to the daughter of an orthodox rabbi from Forest Hills...

Sara "Suri" Kasirer, who represents Israeli clients as New York's No.1 lobbyist. Kasirer is the vice president of Edah, a religious Zionist organization devoted to the State of Israel, and is on the board of the National Jewish Democratic Council. The team of Kasirer and Teitelbaum managed Giuliani's close relationship to the Jewish community and the State of Israel.

Yet another Giuliani partner, Michael D. Hess, was stuck in WTC 7 on 9/11 after explosions destroyed the lobby of the building at about 9:03, when the second plane struck the South Tower -- and when the basement of the adjacent WTC 6 was apparently blown to smithereens. Michael Hess had to be rescued from the 8th floor of WTC 7, as can be seen in this newly released video footage.

About 5 hours after Michael Hess was rescued from the building, WTC 7, which had not been hit by an aircraft, fell straight down into its footprint in what can only be explained as a pre-planned demolition.
To get an idea of how much money Giuliani has been paid for simply "running" for office, I suggest this page on, which shows the Zionist Ira Rennert giving $100,000 to the Giuliani senate campaign in 2000. Rennert is the billionaire Zionist mining magnate who owns a lead smelter in Peru where the lead pollution is so bad that all the children in the town are poisoned. Rennert is also a friend and supporter of Bibi Netanyahu from the right-wing Likud party.

Ira and Ingeborg Rennert with 'Bibi' Netanyahu, one of the masterminds of 9/11

I am working on the final chapter of
Solving 9/11, which focuses on the destruction of the crucial steel evidence from the World Trade Center. In the interest of accuracy and completeness this effort requires contacting the key players in the administration of President George W. Bush. I called and wrote to John Ashcroft and Michael Chertoff, respectively the U.S. Attorney General and Assistant Attorney General during the Bush administration.  Ashcroft has not yet responded; Chertoff has. 

U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft (right) and Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff of the Criminal Division during a news conference at the Department of Justice in February 2003.
Michael Chertoff, who headed the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice at the time, responded to my email question.  Chertoff said that he does not know who authorized the destruction of the crucial evidence from the World Trade Center.  The Federal Bureau of Investigation, it should be noted, an agency of the Criminal Division of the Dept. of Justice under Michael Chertoff, led the 9/11 investigation

FBI Director Robert Mueller (right) at a press conference as Attorney General John Ashcroft looks on September 27, 2001 in Washington, DC. Robert Mueller had only been director of the FBI for one week when 9/11 occurred.
This is to say that Chertoff, the official who had the highest managerial responsibility for the FBI investigation, says he does not know who authorized the destruction of the evidence from the crime scene his agency controlled.  How believable is that? 

The FBI, which controlled the criminal investigation, had ultimate authority over the evidence from the World Trade Center.
The FBI website says this about its 9/11 investigation:

Our ensuing investigation of the attacks of 9/11—code-named “PENTTBOM”—was our largest investigation ever. At the peak of the case, more than half our agents worked to identify the hijackers and their sponsors and, with other agencies, to head off any possible future attacks. We followed more than half-a-million investigative leads, including several hundred thousand tips from the public. The attack and crash sites also represented the largest crime scenes in FBI history.

Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld at ground zero three days after the World Trade Center collapsed. 

A New York Times article entitled "Ground Zero Illness Clouding Giuliani's Legacy" reported that Giuliani “seized control” of the World Trade Center site.  Why did the U.S. government allow Giuliani and his Zionist partners to destroy the crucial evidence from the crime scene?

Here is the email exchange between me and Michael Chertoff:

Mr. Chertoff,

I am a journalist working on an article about the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.  The questions that I am posing herewith are for the purpose of this article.

When Kenneth Holden of the Department of Design and Construction of New York City gave his statement to the 9/11 Commission on April 1, 2003, he said that he had received "verbal permission" to send the steel to scrap yards in New Jersey, but failed to name the person who had authorized the move.

Did you give the permission to send the steel from the World Trade Center to the scrap yard? If you did not authorize the destruction of the steel, who did?

Chertoff responded the same day:

From: Chertoff, Michael
Subject: Re: Question for M. Chertoff on WTC Steel
Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 11:39 AM

No. No idea.
I responded to Chertoff on March 9:

Mr. Chertoff,

Thank you for your prompt response.

When Commissioner Holden was reappointed head of New York City’s Department of Design and Construction in January 2002, Mayor Bloomberg praised him saying:

New Yorkers are fortunate to have Commissioner Holden agree to remain as Commissioner of DDC. Over the last four months he has done a terrific job managing the clean up of the World Trade Center and so that the reconstruction process for Lower Manhattan can begin. By coordinating the movement of millions of tons of steel and rubble, excavating one of the most dangerous work sites in the world all seemingly ahead of schedule, under budget and without a fatality, Kenneth Holden has been the unsung hero of this enormous task.
Can you tell me why U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft and the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, which you headed, allowed Mayor Giuliani to “seize control” of the crime scene and make decisions that resulted in the hasty destruction of crucial evidence before it could be properly examined?

The New York City Department of Design and Construction reportedly oversaw the recovery efforts. A New York Times article entitled
"Ground Zero Illness Clouding Giuliani's Legacy" of 14 May 2007 reported that Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani “seized control” of the World Trade Center site:

An examination of Mr. Giuliani’s handling of the extraordinary recovery operation during his last months in office shows that he seized control and largely limited the influence of experienced federal agencies…

A Mayor in Control - From the beginning, there was no doubt that Mr. Giuliani and his team ruled the hellish disaster site. Officials from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Army Corps of Engineers and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, all with extensive disaster response experience, arrived almost immediately, only to be placed on the sideline. One Army Corps official said Mr. Giuliani acted like a “benevolent dictator.”

Despite the presence of those federal experts, Mr. Giuliani assigned the ground zero cleanup to a largely unknown city agency, the Department of Design and Construction. Kenneth Holden, the department’s commissioner until January 2004, said in a deposition in the federal lawsuit against the city that he initially expected FEMA or the Army Corps to try to take over the cleanup operation. Mr. Giuliani never let them.

Why did President Bush and Attorney General Ashcroft allow Mayor Giuliani to “take over the cleanup operation”?

Christopher Bollyn
Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, “Who Destroyed the 9/11 Evidence?” 

Bollyn, "The 9-11 Cover-Up: Italian Gangsters and Jewish Bosses", 1 October 2007

Dickter, Adam, "Ground Zero's 'Jewish Knight': Giuliani holdover Richard Sheirer says he'll stay on as city emergency chief to 'finish what I started'," The Jewish Week, 18 January 2002

Griscom, Amanda, "Man Behind the Mayor", New York Magazine

Bollyn, "Ehud Olmert's Secret Visit to New York on Eve of 9-11", 2 December 2007

Bollyn, "Top Secret: Ehud Olmert's 9-11 Visit to NYC", 4 December 2007 

"Giuliani’s Profitable Partnership, Steinmetz Ties Aided Business Efforts And Speaking Fees", by Mary Jacoby and Andrew Morse, Wall Street Journal 

The "Huge Bullet Hole" in the South Tower and Analysis of Missile Evidence

Updated - April 17, 2011

This photograph from the Hugo Neu Schnitzer East (HNSE) scrapyard shows Professor Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl of U.C. Berkeley's school of engineering inspecting what he described as an interior column with what he wrote were "very clear signs of a large, round, and fast moving object entering the left side of the box and cutting a quarter of a circle hole in the column."  Astaneh-Asl called this bite out of the core column a "huge bullet hole." 

Was the hole in the column made by the depleted uranium tipped missile that made a bright white flash as it penetrated the tower wall?  What else besides a white-hot D.U. warhead could have had the energy to cut such a hole in a core column?  

Did the column cause the deflection seen in the two smoking pieces of the D.U. missile seen flying out of the South Tower?  The white flaming object leaving black smoke appears to be the D.U. warhead.  Is this the real smoking gun? 

Dr. Astenah-Asl said that it appeared that this column came from the South Tower. Judging by the thickness of the steel, it could very well be from the impact level of the tower.  The fast moving round object that cut the hole appears to have had a diameter of about 3 or 4 feet (90-120 cm).  Was this hole cut by the depleted uranium-tipped missile that was seen coming out of the South Tower ahead of the explosion? (Source: Astaneh Final Report)

Glenda Cooper of The Washington Post wrote more about the mysterious "huge bullet hole" and other evidence of a "very fast" object that went through the tower like "a butter knife" discovered by Astaneh-Asl on October 6, 2001:

The girders and beams provide evidence that far from disintegrating on impact, the plane that hit the South Tower penetrated to the building's core. One beam from the outer part of the building is buckled and twisted but with a sharp grooved line running along it, which Astaneh-Asl believes was caused by the wing of the aircraft slicing through. "There is a very clear line here," he said today during a news conference. "It looks like a butter knife has gone through it and left a nice clear line. This can only happen if something very fast hits it."

Similar lines are on a column from the interior of the South Tower, which has what looks like a smooth bite taken out of two sides. On the first side (the side of impact) the hole is almost uniformly smooth from when the plane tore through. The second inner side is more ragged, from the plane encountering resistance from the metal.

"Before, no one knew what happened to the columns inside, in the elevator shaft and the stairwell," said Astaneh-Asl. "Now we know the plane went through and sheared off part of the columns and took a bite out of it, leaving what looks like a huge bullet hole. The bite we see is the curve of the engine or the fuselage." (But the radius of this hole is less than 2 feet! C.B.)

Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl

Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl from the University of California at Berkeley and graduate student Qiuhong Zhao went to New York City on a grant from the National Science Foundation to collect data on the mechanical and structural properties of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers, particulary steel affected by heat, fire and impact.

History Commons has a page documenting the statements of Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl about the steel debris removed from the World Trade Center.  I called Astaneh-Asl at his home on 5 April 2011 to ask about the hole he had expressed great interest in.  He told me that he had not saved the piece of steel, which he wrote "arose a lot of interest", and that he had simply allowed it to be "recycled".  Why would an engineer working on a grant from the National Science Foundation allow such an interesting piece of evidence to be simply destroyed without photographing and documenting it carefully?  This could very well be the "bullet hole" caused by the depleted uranium tipped missile that was seen hitting and exiting the South Tower.

Astaneh wanted to know what I thought had caused the collapse of the Twin Towers.  When I told him that I thought the towers had been demolished with explosives including Thermite and a nano-composite of thermite, he began to attack me saying that I was wasting my time and hurting the feelings of the victims' relatives.  When I asked him about Dr. Steven E. Jones' discovery of chips of nano-thermite in the dust of the towers, Astaneh dismissed it, saying that Jones is not an engineer. 

Astaneh then responded to my email request:

Dear Mr. Bollyn:  As I clearly stated in our phone conversation a few minutes ago, I am very disturbed by the people such as yourself , who are part of this "Conspiracy theorist" regarding World Trade Center collapse. These people have used my name and research results in totally incorrect way , and in completely opposite way of what the research results had indicated. By doing so, you and all others have implied that our research somehow support your totally incorrect theories.

I hereby officially notify you in writing that if you use my name or the results of our research in any publication implying that the data that we have collected on the WTC somehow supports or provides you with evidence in support of your totally base less conspiracy theories, I reserve the right to take any legal action necessary to protect my reputation as well as integrity of my research.

Let me state again that after 6 years of studying the collapse of World Trade Center, I have not found any evidence to support any of the claims of "conspiracy theorists".
In my opinion, and based on scientific facts, the only cause of collapse was the structural and fire damage to the towers that had many unusual features and were not designed according to the buildings codes, standards and the practice.

A. Astaneh, Professor

It should be noted that Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl and Ronald O. Hamburger of Simpson Gumpertz & Heger (which does a lot of work for the U.S. military) were two of the first structural engineers interviewed on 9/11 about what caused the collapse of the Twin Towers. Hamburger joined SGH in 2002 from the EQE structural engineering division of ABS Consulting, a risk management consulting company, where he was Senior Vice President and Chief Structural Engineer. Hamburger previously worked for Bechtel as an Assistant Chief Civil/Structural Engineer.

Both Hamburger and Astaneh-Asl agreed that the towers collapsed due to fire.  Hamburger went on to play a key role in the FEMA 9/11 investigation of the World Trade Center.  One has to wonder why PBS chose to interview these two men to talk about the collapses and if their opinions had anything to do with their future work on the 9/11 investigation.

Here is part of their comments from what they said on September 11, 2001 on PBS Newshour about what they thought had caused the towers to collapse:

ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: Those twin towers, which were completed in 1973 were 110 stories tall, 1,360 feet. They were the tallest buildings in New York City, roughly 50,000 people work in them. They were designed to be a hub for international trade and were part of a seven-building complex, which was completed in 1988. In addition to the twin towers, one other of the seven buildings in the World Trade Center complex also collapsed late this afternoon.

For more on the buildings we turn now to two structural engineers, Ron Hamburger, chief structural engineer at UQE, an engineering firm, and Hassan Astaneh, professor of engineering at UC Berkeley who is helping develop guidelines for the American Institute for Steel Construction, guidelines that would help structures withstand terrorist attack. Ron Hamburger, you've seen the video and the plane hitting. You've seen the fires and the collapse. What do you think happened?

RON HAMBURGER: Well, incredible as it may seem, the buildings survived the aircraft attack. Both of them were able to stand for the better part of two hours after the crash. What they just were not able to survive was the incredibly intense fires that ensued from all of that burning jet fuel. Structural steel, these buildings were steel billings. Structural steel when it gets hot loses strength. The steel elements that held up the building where the crash occurred got hot from the fires at about the 90th floor. They were supporting 20 floors of building above it. And when they lost the ability to support that, all of that mass, like another building, came down on top of the rest of the structure like a pile hammer and just essentially drove the rest of the building into the ground.

ELIZABETH FARNSWORTH: Now, we don't know for sure, do we, that, Mr. Astaneh... We don't know for sure that there wasn't some kind of a bomb. But you didn't think there had to be a bomb for this happen?

HASSAN ASTANEH: That's exactly case. We are not sure, of course, what was in those planes but the amount of fuel that came and was delivered to this building was enough, in my opinion, as I agree with Ron, that the cause of this collapse and tragedy was really what we call progress of collapse. What happened here was the initial impact did not cause much damage; it just ignited the fire. The fuel was supplied. The fire on almost four hours - and at that time the temperature of the columns - they have reached the critical level which is 1000 degrees Fahrenheit, and when steel reaches that level of temperature, it loses its strength, and of course the upper floors, the weight of those upper floors completely collapsed on the lower part and hammered it down and collapsed it.

End of updated section; original article begins here:

This article began as a New Year's letter (in italics) to 9/11 researcher Dr. Steven E. Jones, which I decided to make an open letter:

Dear Professor Jones,

All the best wishes for 2011, which I hope will be a great year for 9/11 truth.

This morning, the first thing I did, even before getting out of my pajamas, was examine a photo that has bothered me for some time (as it sits on my desk). It is the attached photo (No. 0879 from the Here is New York website).

Photo 0879 from Here is New York website shows the view from the North of the plane striking South Tower.

What bothers me is the fact that the fireballs seem to be exploding much too quickly to be merely jet fuel. As you know, I am of the opinion that depleted uranium tipped missiles preceded the entry of each plane, by a few milliseconds of impact. This is apparently what caused the white flash seen as each plane impacted the tower. The depleted uranium warhead would have created a super-heated space inside the tower which would have detonated any pre-placed thermate charges on the floor (for example in the large "battery" racks in the computer room, which were "never turned on," according to a person who worked there) and ignited the dispersed jet fuel. The DU-tipped missile was the trigger of the spectacular fireballs witnessed by millions.

Both planes were guided to fly directly into secure computer rooms in which large amounts of thermate could have been concealed in phony battery arrays like this.  The white-hot penetrator of a depleted uranium warhead would have detonated the thermate, creating the spectacular fireballs and destroying the aircraft - and the evidence.

From my article "9/11 Planes Flew Directly into Secure Computer Rooms in Both Towers"

Then, suddenly, out of the blue, a former bank employee came forward, a person who had visited the 81st floor on a weekly basis.  His information explains more than he probably thought and provides us with a major clue about what really happened on 9/11.

Fuji Bank had torn up the 81st floor, he said, and stripped it down to the bare bone to reinforce the trusses so that the floor could hold more weight.  Then they had built a raised floor and filled the entire floor with server-size Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) batteries.

These units were bolted to the raised floor which stood about 3 feet above the reinforced 81st floor.  Beneath the raised floor ran the cables and power supply that connected the army of batteries.  IT techies had to get down on all fours and crawl around beneath the raised floor to connect cables.

"The whole floor was batteries," he said, "huge battery-looking things."  They were "all black" and "solid, very heavy" things that had been brought in during the night.  They had been put in place during the summer prior to 9/11, he said.

But were they really batteries?

"It's weird," he said.  "They were never turned on."

So, what really was on the 81st floor of WTC 2?  What was in these heavy "battery-looking things?"  Were they batteries, or were they Thermite?

- "9/11 Planes Flew Directly into Secure Computer Rooms in Both Towers", January 11, 2007

The spectacular explosions on the 81st floor that accompanied the impact of the planes were apparently created with thermate incendiaries containing barium nitrate, which would explain the light orange flame and white smoke.

The large amount of molten metal (apparently iron) cascading from the 81st floor indicates that tons of thermate (an incendiary form of thermite) had been placed in the computer room into which the plane flew.  See  Thermite in the World Trade Center - The Censored Evidence

A missile fired from a pod under the fuselage can be seen in images of the plane striking the South Tower.  The missile (which appears in lower left photo to have a trail with a diameter of about 1 meter) would have had much greater velocity than the aircraft penetrating the tower.  If this missile exceeded the speed of sound did it cause the sonic boom reportedly heard by witnesses?

The aircraft said to be Flight 175 hit 23 of the 59 steel columns (14-inch box columns) spaced about 26 inches apart (3' 4" on center).  The perimeter steel columns, cross beams (52-inch spandrel plates), and concrete floors would have arrested the forward movement of the plane.  While an engine could have broken loose from the wing, it would have lost most of its forward momentum, especially after breaking through three 14-inch wide steel box columns.  Source: World Trade Center Building Performance Study, FEMA

Note that the nose of the plane struck the 81st floor slab and spandrel, which would have cut the fuselage in half lengthwise.  The only parts of the plane that would have been on or above floor 81 would have been the right wing and engine, a slice of the fuselage, and the vertical fin.  (This NIST diagram shows the right engine hitting the spandrel of the 82nd floor, which means that the engine thought to have flown right through the tower would have first broken through the spandrel and three columns as well as through the 4-inch concrete floor, its steel pan and dense trusswork - edgewise.  This is extremely unlikely, if not impossible.  Furthermore, the main landing gear stowed under the fuselage would have entered and passed through the building on the 80th floor (or lower).  The left engine and wing would have entered the tower on the 79th floor.  Source: NIST Report on the World Trade Center

The actual aircraft that supposedly hit the South Tower and its landing gear...

which fold up beneath the fuselage during flight.  (The missile object is circled.)

How the landing gear tuck up into the fuselage during flight.  Source:  NIST

There was no evidence of a hole on the 79th or 80th floors through which the landing gear could have passed.  The space between the columns is only 26 inches (65 cm) wide.  There is no possible way that the landing gear passed through the 80th floor of the South Tower and flew some 400 meters - burning white-hot.  The government claim that it did appears to be nothing but a bold-faced lie to cover up the photographic evidence of a uranium-tipped missile.

There is no structural damage to the columns of the 80th or 79th floors that would indicate that the aircraft's landing gear passed through the building.  This is additional proof that the white-hot burning object is certainly not the landing gear.  Nearly all of the structural damage appears to have occurred on the 81st floor, where only the right engine, part of the right wing, and a slice of the fuselage entered - possibly along with the missile.  The 81st floor, where most of the explosive/fire damage clearly occurred, is exactly the floor on which the phony battery arrays were located.  The Fuji Bank occupied floors 79-82.  I spoke with Stanley Praimnath, who worked on the 81st floor, to learn more about the possibility of a large amount of thermate being placed on that floor. He told me that there was a large number of computers and backup batteries on the 81st floor, but that the batteries were never turned on.  See "Christopher Bollyn interviews Stanley Praimnath, A survivor of the 9/11 attack on the 81st floor of the South Tower"

The 14-inch box columns and 52-inch spandrel plates, the 4-inch thick concrete floors and their steel pans and trusses, and the massive core columns would have prevented the wreckage of the plane from passing through the building.

The exterior column construction showing the floor pan trusswork.  The exterior wall construction was extremely strong and would have destroyed the plane and stopped the wreckage from passing through the building.  A 767 engine has a diameter of about 9 feet (94" - 115") and would have had to pass through at least three steel columns - on both sides of the building.  It is simply not possible for a jet engine flying between 666-800 kph (414-500 mph) to break through two walls of steel columns and fly another 450 meters.  The best estimate for the maximum speed of Flight 175, however, (if an unmodified Boeing 767) is 360 knots, i.e. 185.2 meters/second or 414.36 mph.  Was the data manipulated to explain the high velocity objects that passed through the South Tower or was the plane a modified 767?  In any case, the engine found at the corner of Murray and Church Streets apparently came from a missile with higher velocity than a normal Boeing 767 flying at maximum speed at sea level.   Source: World Trade Center Building Performance Study, FEMA 

The white-hot burning object (seen on right) shows the characteristics of a depleted uranium penetrator.  The dense uranium penetrator obviously has much greater velocity and would have acted as the detonator for the thermate explosion that ignited the jet fuel.  The buildings were about 64 meters (209 feet) on each side.  In this photo, the white burning object has passed through the steel-framed tower and flown about 150 meters further.  There are no parts of a Boeing 767 that would burn white-hot like this.  Did this white-hot burning object crash into another building or did it land on the street, like the engine on the corner of Murray and Church streets?

The FEMA report said the engine and (landing gear) from Flight 175 landed about 1,725 feet (525 meters) from the point of impact with the wall of the South Tower.  The engine flew about 450 meters after passing through the tower.  The arc of the falling engine suggests that it had a velocity of about 57-60 meters/second (205-216 km/hour) after breaking through at least three 14-inch steel box columns in the south wall, the 64-meter wide tower, and more columns in the north wall.

The two objects seen flying out of the South Tower were moving significantly faster than Bobby Hull's famous slapshot (clocked at 118.3 mph or 190.4 km/h), the fastest in the history of ice hockey. This suggests that these objects had greater velocity entering the building than the aircraft's reported speed of 800 km/hour.  The government's claim that UA 175 was flying 800 km/hour is challenged by the fact that an unmodified Boeing 767 has a maximum speed of only 360 knots (666 km/hour) at sea level.  Therefore, either the reported speed (NTSB) is not correct - or we are talking about a modified 767, or both.

The light orange flame and white smoke of the fireball coming from the entry hole on the South Tower are indicative of thermate explosions while the darker orange flames and soot are evidently from the burning jet fuel.  Both planes flew into secure computer rooms in which large amounts of thermate could have been placed.  The thermate explosions would have destroyed most of the aircraft.  Although the more durable landing gear and engines were reportedly recovered from Flight 175, they were not identified by their many numbered time-tracked parts.

The unidentified engine found on the corner of Murray and Church Streets.  This appears to a part from a small engine, less than 1 meter in diameter, and may be only 2 feet depending on the length of the carpenter's square that has been laid on top.  If this is the high velocity object that is seen leaving the white smoke, it is probably not from the aircraft - but the missile.  It is too small and flew too far after hitting the South Tower.

The white-hot burning object evidently hit the Burlington Coat Factory on Park Place (in red circle).  We are told that the building was hit by parts of the landing gear and fuselage of Flight 175 but no photos of these parts were presented.  The Wikipedia article on the Burlington Coat Factory building says this:  "In 2001, in the 9/11 attacks after hijacked Flight 175 penetrated through a tower of the World Trade Center, part of the plane's landing gear and fuselage came out the north side of the tower and crashed through the roof and two of the floors of the Burlington Coat Factory at 45–47 Park Place, between West Broadway and Church Street, (600 feet or 180 meters) north of the former World Trade Center (edge of property). The plane parts destroyed three floor beams, and severely compromised the building's internal structure."  The only problem is that the landing gear of a Boeing aircraft would not burn white-hot and would probably not carry that far.  The damage to the Burlington building was not caused by landing gear.  No landing gear was seen flying in that direction.

The engine that landed on the corner of Murray Street flew an estimated 1,725 feet (525 meters) after hitting the wall of the South Tower (at a height of about 300 meters).  It is highly unlikely that a 767 jet engine, even from an aircraft supposedly flying 800 km/hour* (about 223 meters/second) could fly that far after passing through a very densely framed steel building like the tower. (Maximum speed for a Boeing 767 at sea level is 360 knots or 666 km/hour.) Most (if not all) of the aircraft did not even pass through the tower.  Source: Jon Carlson

The two objects that are seen in the second photo have long been of great interest to me.  I think (and have written) that the object seen leaving the blackish trail of oxides is the depleted uranium warhead, which Marion Fulk, a former scientist at Livermore Lab, also thought was possible.

The two objects showing incredible inertia are seen in this photo.  Note the difference in their oxide trails.  The white-hot object leaving the black oxides is probably the depleted uranium penetrator while the object leaving the white trail is probably the engine and fuel that propelled the missile.

This morning it occurred to me that the second object, the one leaving the white trail, is probably the rocket burning off its unspent fuel. Since the rocket was only fired as the plane neared the tower, this rocket engine has only flown about 250 feet by the time it passes out of the tower. It certainly has the mass and velocity - and unused fuel - to be out ahead of the blast along with the DU warhead.

The two objects that have incredible velocity are way out in front (of the parts of the aircraft) as can be seen in this photo...

and the DU penetrator burning white-hot and leaving behind its trail of dark oxides is clearly seen in this photo.

Can you help me with the physics of this a little bit, or do you know anyone who can? The plane was flying about 500 mph when the rocket would have been launched from the pod beneath the body of the plane. I assume the rocket would have accelerated to about 500 mph on its own as it passed through the building. Roughly, I estimate that the heavy parts of the missile, i.e. the rocket and the DU tip, would have been going about 1,000 mph as they passed through the tower. The white hot DU tip would have been disconnected from the rocket engine and both of them may have been deflected somewhat from their original trajectory, although both are pretty much on their original course. I would assume that the more massive DU tip would be the part least deflected.

This is what I have been thinking about on the first day of 2011. I think it will be a great year. I am hot on the trail of the guys who destroyed the steel from the WTC and you know better than I why this was such an important part of the crime...

With many thanks and all the best wishes for 2011,

Christopher Bollyn

The theory of pre-placement of thermate in the computer rooms into which the planes crashed at the World Trade Center is supported by the differences in the damage caused when a B-25 bomber crashed into the Empire State Building in 1945.  The culprits of 9/11 knew that because large-body passenger aircraft crash into skyscrapers so rarely they could allow for spectacular Hollywood special effects like the thermate fire balls seen coming from both towers on impact.  They knew there would be no test done afterwards to see if what was observed on 9/11 could be duplicated. 

The 1945 crash of a B-25 bomber allows for some comparison on the structural damage to the different towers.

The force of B-25 on the building has been calculated here.  It is important to note that the 15-ton bomber flying at an estimated 400 kph came to a rest 20 meters into the building.  (See Bomber Crash into Empire State Building)  If the plane that struck the South Tower was flying twice as fast, how far would the wreckage pass through the building?  Twice as far?  Given the amount of steel that blocked its passage, most of the aircraft debris would have not exited the tower on the far side.  None was seen with the exception of the two objects flying out ahead of the explosion.  The main reasons for placing thermate explosives in the computer rooms into which the planes were guided was probably to destroy by an extremely hot explosion as much of the plane debris and evidence as possible to prevent identification of the remotely-guided planes.


Note:  I have written about the evidence that DU-tipped missiles were fired into each tower before impact by the planes since 2004, after having learned about the characteristics of depleted uranium from Doug Rokke and Marion Fulk.

Marion Fulk, former staff scientist from the Manhattan Project and Star Wars program, tutored Bollyn on the properties and dangers of depleted uranium at his home in Livermore, California.  Fulk said he felt obliged to inform the public about the dangers of uranium to human health.

 If you would like to help support my research and fund my upcoming tour,
donate through my website at

or by PayPal to: 

Were DU Missiles used on the World Trade Center? 

by Christopher Bollyn

23 October 2004

The video, "911: In Plane Site," by Dave von Kleist, examines the video evidence and shows that there was a white flash before United Airlines Flight 175 and American Airlines Flight 11 struck the towers.

In the case of the South Tower, the von Kleist video shows the underside of the plane, seen from from four different cameras and angles, with a cylindrical pod and a mysterious white object being fired from the pod before the plane hits the tower. This object impacts the tower before the plane, creating a bright flash.  

A similar white flash can be seen in the video, made by the Naudet brothers, of Flight 11 crashing into the North Tower.  

The white flashes are similar to the flashes that are seen when depleted uranium (DU) penetrators hits their target. DU is a spontaneous pyrophoric material, i.e. it inflames when reaching its target generating such heat that it explodes.  (More correctly stated, a pyrophoric substance is a reactive metal, like uranium, that will ignite spontaneously in air.) 

If DU missiles preceded the impacts of Flights 175 and 11, then there is the question of what happened to the DU penetrators? One would expect that they traveled through the towers and carried on into the streets of New York or into other buildings.  

Unless they impacted sufficiently dense objects to stop them, they should have continued through the buildings, and be seen flying ahead of the flames and debris. After all, uranium is 1.7 times more dense than lead.  

A photo in Eric Hufschmid's book "Painful Questions" [p. 39, seen above] shows two objects passing through the South Tower, ahead of the flames. One of them displays the characterics of burning uranium [see above photos].  

In the main photo, seen below, two objects are visible passing through the South Tower. One is black and leaving a white smoke trail; the other is burning with a bright white flame and leaving a black trail.  

The color of the flame and the color of the oxides [smoke] are important. The color of the flame indicates the substance that is burning and its temperature. The bright white flame is indicative of a reactive metal, such as magnesium or uranium.  

I contacted Marion Fulk, a former staff scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Lab, to ask about the photos seen below. After studying the photos, I asked Fulk if the object in the photo could be burning uranium.  

"Yes," Fulk said, "It is possible." Asked if the black smoke could be uranium oxides, Fulk said, "Yes, it could be uranium oxide."  

Fulk went on to describe the "dirty" olive green, brown, and black colors of the 21 different phases of uranium oxide.  

The gap between the burning object and the black smoke trail was explained by Leuren Moret, geo-scientist and international radiation expert, who said that the gap is where the uranium gas and vapors are so hot they are still invisible. As the vapors cool, they condense into visible uranium oxides.  

Asked how the piece of uranium could be burning so hot, Moret explained that some of the kinetic energy from the uranium missile would be converted into heat.  

If this is a DU penetrator, it could explain Moret's claim that the World Trade Center rubble was radioactive.  

Were DU missiles used to ignite the fuel in the airplanes to create the spectacular explosions that were used to explain the pre-planned demolition of the twin towers?  

Video Evidence of DU on 9/11 

Christopher Bollyn presented evidence that debunked the official version of events of 9/11 at a meeting in Los Angeles in October 2004.  

He showed this video about the possibility that uranium was used during the attack at the WTC and the Pentagon:  

The photo below from the Pentagon clean-up shows the extensive decontamination procedures that were followed after 9/11. Such procedures and precautions were not done at the World Trade Center.  What were the people at the Pentagon so concerned about?  Was the site hot from depleted uranium?

End Notes and Comments:

* "Based on analysis of radar data, the National Transportation and Safety Board reported the groundspeed just before impact as 510 knots. This is well beyond the maximum operating velocity of 360 knots, and maximum dive velocity of 410 knots. The possibilities as I see them are:
(1) this wasn’t a standard 767-200;
(2) the radar data was compromised in some manner;
(3) the NTSB analysis was erroneous; or
(4) the 767 flew well beyond its flight envelope, was controllable, and managed to hit a relatively small target."
- Dwain Deets, Retired NASA Senior Executive, “NASA Flight Director Confirms 9/11 Aircraft Speed As The ‘Elephant In The Room’”, June 22, 2010,

Important comment from Captain Russ Wittenberg, who knows all about the 767 that supposedly hit the South Tower - having flown the aircraft multiple times:

To my aviator and non-aviator friends, this is a very short, non technical, visual demonstration of aerodynamics at transonic to supersonic speeds. This is important to know, even if you are NOT an aviator.  Why?  Well, if you’re at all interested in the events that happened on 9/11/01 at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, this will begin to explain WHY the "official story" (actually, fairy tale) that almost everyone (who is NOT a pilot or has knowledge of high speed flight) has bought into, "hook, line, and sinker."  "They" would have us believe that the airliners going well over 110 knots ABOVE their maximum design limit speed (called Vmo)!  The fakers who made up the "fairy tale" of course weren't pilots, so, they didn't know what they were doing! 

Here are the numbers: The fakers say the B-757's and 767's were doing about 530 MPH (that's statute miles per hour).  Well, we don't use statute miles!  We use KNOTS! So, this translates to about 460 Knots, which is exactly 110 knots ABOVE Vmo of 350 Kts at about 1000' above MSL (sea level)! IN LEVEL FLIGHT NO LESS!!!! THIS IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE! The "Drag Rise" (shock waves) would rip the wings off the airplane well before reaching that speed! Above Vy, (best rate of climb speed) drag increases to the square of the velocity of the air speed! Remember folks, these were AIRLINERS - NOT JET FIGHTERS like the ones you will see here!

United Air Lines Captain Russ Wittenberg (ret.) was Pilot in Command (PIC) on each of the UAL aircraft that were supposedly used on the event on 9/11 - multiple times.  He flew the actual B-767 that hit the South Tower (UA 175) and the B-757 that supposedly crashed at Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Cooper, Glenda, "Trade Center Scrap Is Examined For Details on Causes of Collapse", The Washington Post, 6 October 2001

9/11: World Trade Center Attack, Pilots for 9/11 Truth

"WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767", by Jon Carlson, April 4, 2005

Bollyn, Christopher, "Understanding the Use of Thermite on 9/11", July 14, 2009

Bollyn, Christopher, "9/11 Planes Flew Directly into Secure Computer Rooms in Both Towers," January 11, 2007  


©2022 Christopher Bollyn | Sitemap | christopher at bollyn dot com